Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng

Sascha Mölck (traducido por Francisco García), 09/29/PM

Buen paquete. El Hewlett Packard Pavilion 15-aw004ng es un portátil interesante. El todoterreno de 15.6" trae una pantalla mate FHD, un SSD, y un montaje de doble gráfica AMD. El precio de estas chuches: 550 Euros. Un precio como ese por un paquete como este puede convencer a la mayoría de compradores a que hagan la vista gorda con ciertos defectos, tales como el aguante de batería inferior a la media y la garantía de un año.

HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA (Pavilion 15 Serie)
Procesador
AMD A10-9600P 2.4 GHz
Adaptador gráfico
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX - 2048 MB, Núcleo: 1021 MHz, Memoría: 1000 MHz, Crimson 16.7.3, CrossFire
Memoría
8192 MB 
, DDR4-2132, Dual-Channel, dos ranuras (ocupadas)
pantalla
15.6 pulgadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixels 141 PPI, Chi Mei, TN LED, lustroso: no
Placa base
AMD CZ FCH
Tarjeta de sonido
Realtek High Definition Audio
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Conexiones: clavija headset 3.5mm, Card Reader: SD, TPM 2.0
Equipamento de red
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8101/2/3 Family Fast Ethernet NIC (10/100MBit), Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0
Unidad óptica
hp DVDRW SU228HB
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 22.5 x 382 x 242
Battería
41 Wh Litio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionales
Altavoces: estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Luz de Teclado: no, Cyberlink Power Media Player 14, Cyberlink PowerDirector 12, McAfee LiveSafe-Internet Security (prueba), MS Office (prueba), 12 Meses Garantía
Peso
1.99 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 338 g
Precio
599 Euro

 

Size Comparison

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275
68.7 MB/s ∼100% +20%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
57.3 MB/s ∼83%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
16.7 MB/s ∼24% -71%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
16.5 MB/s ∼24% -71%
Asus F555UB-XO043T
13.4 MB/s ∼20% -77%
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G
11.2 MB/s ∼16% -80%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275
88.1 MB/s ∼100% +3%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85.3 MB/s ∼97%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
33.2 MB/s ∼38% -61%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
26 MB/s ∼30% -70%
Asus F555UB-XO043T
25.5 MB/s ∼29% -70%
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G
10.2 MB/s ∼12% -88%
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
276 MBit/s ∼100% +188%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC
96 MBit/s ∼35%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
334 MBit/s ∼100% +237%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC
99 MBit/s ∼30%
229
cd/m²
237
cd/m²
231
cd/m²
214
cd/m²
240
cd/m²
222
cd/m²
225
cd/m²
229
cd/m²
223
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 240 cd/m² Médio: 227.8 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
iluminación: 89 %
Brillo con batería: 139 cd/m²
Contraste: 490:1 (Negro: 0.49 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.96 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 11.34 | - Ø
60% sRGB (Argyll) 39% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.27
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
TN LED, 1920x1080
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G
TN LED, 1920x1080
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
TN LED, 1920x1080
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275
IPS, 1920x1080
Asus F555UB-XO043T
TN LED, 1366x768
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
TN LED, 1366x768
Response Times
-3%
-5%
25%
-15%
19%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
41
45
-10%
43
-5%
24
41%
46
-12%
27
34%
Response Time Black / White *
23
22
4%
24
-4%
21
9%
27
-17%
22
4%
PWM Frequency
50
50
50
Screen
-2%
-2%
49%
7%
7%
Brightness
228
196
-14%
221
-3%
285
25%
205
-10%
198
-13%
Brightness Distribution
89
76
-15%
84
-6%
83
-7%
82
-8%
83
-7%
Black Level *
0.49
0.34
31%
0.49
-0%
0.26
47%
0.46
6%
0.28
43%
Contrast
490
588
20%
486
-1%
1131
131%
465
-5%
714
46%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
10.96
11.54
-5%
11.19
-2%
5.07
54%
6.52
41%
10.63
3%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
11.34
12.98
-14%
11.53
-2%
4.25
63%
7.05
38%
11.19
1%
Gamma
2.27 106%
2.58 93%
2.41 100%
2.49 96%
2.41 100%
1.78 135%
CCT
12292 53%
14060 46%
13057 50%
6597 99%
8623 75%
11258 58%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
39
36
-8%
38
-3%
54
38%
36.6
-6%
35
-10%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
60
56
-7%
60
0%
83
38%
57.8
-4%
56
-7%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
-3% / -2%
-4% / -3%
37% / 44%
-4% / 2%
13% / 9%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 59 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 655 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 28740) Hz.

CalMAN - Color Checker
CalMAN - Color Checker
CalMAN - Grey Levels
CalMAN - Grey Levels
CalMAN - Saturation
CalMAN - Saturation

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
23 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 10 ms subida
↘ 13 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 20 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (27.3 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
41 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 19 ms subida
↘ 22 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 276 (máximo) ms. » 44 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (43 ms).
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
LatencyMon
 
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
4769
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
6077
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
2520
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
24.74 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
2.59 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
0.87 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
32.05 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
215 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
75 Points
ayuda
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U
131 Points ∼69% +75%
Asus F555UB-XO043T
Intel Core i5-6200U
115 Points ∼61% +53%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275
Intel Core i5-6200U
114 Points ∼60% +52%
HP Pavilion 14t-ab000 K9E07AV
Intel Core i3-5010U
87 Points ∼46% +16%
Asus F555LJ-XX110H
Intel Core i3-5010U
85 Points ∼45% +13%
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G
AMD FX-8800P
78 Points ∼41% +4%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P
75 Points ∼39%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
AMD A10-8700P
74 Points ∼39% -1%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U
312 Points ∼19% +45%
Asus F555UB-XO043T
Intel Core i5-6200U
289 Points ∼17% +34%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275
Intel Core i5-6200U
282 Points ∼17% +31%
HP Pavilion 14t-ab000 K9E07AV
Intel Core i3-5010U
219 Points ∼13% +2%
Asus F555LJ-XX110H
Intel Core i3-5010U
217 Points ∼13% +1%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P
215 Points ∼13%
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G
AMD FX-8800P
207 Points ∼12% -4%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
AMD A10-8700P
195 Points ∼12% -9%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U
4984 Points ∼68% +98%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275
Intel Core i5-6200U
4357 Points ∼59% +73%
Asus F555UB-XO043T
Intel Core i5-6200U
4315 Points ∼59% +71%
Asus F555LJ-XX110H
Intel Core i3-5010U
3114 Points ∼42% +24%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P
2520 Points ∼34%
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G
AMD FX-8800P
2417 Points ∼33% -4%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
AMD A10-8700P
2325 Points ∼32% -8%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U
10803 Points ∼31% +78%
Asus F555UB-XO043T
Intel Core i5-6200U
9936 Points ∼29% +64%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275
Intel Core i5-6200U
7776 Points ∼22% +28%
Asus F555LJ-XX110H
Intel Core i3-5010U
7222 Points ∼21% +19%
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G
AMD FX-8800P
6820 Points ∼20% +12%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
AMD A10-8700P
6385 Points ∼18% +5%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P
6077 Points ∼17%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus F555UB-XO043T
Intel Core i5-6200U
6007 Points ∼22% +10%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275
Intel Core i5-6200U
5558 Points ∼21% +2%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P
5445 Points ∼20%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
AMD A10-8700P
4550 Points ∼17% -16%
Asus F555LJ-XX110H
Intel Core i3-5010U
4540 Points ∼17% -17%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus F555UB-XO043T
Intel Core i5-6200U
2754 Points ∼59% +35%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275
Intel Core i5-6200U
2577 Points ∼55% +26%
Asus F555LJ-XX110H
Intel Core i3-5010U
2167 Points ∼47% +6%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P
2039 Points ∼44%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
AMD A10-8700P
1944 Points ∼42% -5%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U (Edge 38.14393.0.0)
212.34 Points ∼66% +66%
Asus F555UB-XO043T
Intel Core i5-6200U (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
186.39 Points ∼58% +46%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275
Intel Core i5-6200U (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
181.3 Points ∼57% +42%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P (Edge 38)
127.57 Points ∼40%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
AMD A10-8700P (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
109.87 Points ∼34% -14%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Asus F555LJ-XX110H
Intel Core i3-5010U (IE 11)
3232.3 ms * ∼5% -54%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
AMD A10-8700P (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
2266.9 ms * ∼4% -8%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P (Edge 38)
2098.3 ms * ∼4%
Asus F555UB-XO043T
Intel Core i5-6200U (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
1336.5 ms * ∼2% +36%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275
Intel Core i5-6200U (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
1278.9 ms * ∼2% +39%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275
Intel Core i5-6200U (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
27029 Points ∼60% +43%
Asus F555UB-XO043T
Intel Core i5-6200U (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
26586 Points ∼59% +41%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P (Edge 38)
18921 Points ∼42%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
AMD A10-8700P (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
15801 Points ∼35% -16%
Asus F555LJ-XX110H
Intel Core i3-5010U (IE 11)
10182 Points ∼23% -46%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

PCMark 7 Score
4340 puntos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2904 puntos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3569 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3883 puntos
ayuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0
4281 Points ∼66% +10%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275
GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
4095 Points ∼63% +5%
Asus F555UB-XO043T
GeForce 940M, 6200U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024
4091 Points ∼63% +5%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
Radeon R8 M445DX, A10-9600P
3883 Points ∼60%
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G
Radeon R8 M365DX, FX-8800P, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPVX
3540 Points ∼54% -9%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
Radeon R6 M340DX, A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024
3290 Points ∼50% -15%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0
3497 Points ∼62% +20%
Asus F555UB-XO043T
GeForce 940M, 6200U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024
3305 Points ∼58% +14%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275
GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
2961 Points ∼52% +2%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
Radeon R8 M445DX, A10-9600P
2904 Points ∼51%
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G
Radeon R8 M365DX, FX-8800P, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPVX
2806 Points ∼49% -3%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
Radeon R6 M340DX, A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024
2485 Points ∼44% -14%
Sequential Read: 502.8 MB/s
Sequential Write: 316.6 MB/s
512K Read: 261.9 MB/s
512K Write: 281.2 MB/s
4K Read: 17.04 MB/s
4K Write: 46.55 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 125 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 131.4 MB/s
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G
Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPVX
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275
Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
Asus F555UB-XO043T
Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-88%
-89%
67%
-89%
Write 4k QD32
131.4
1.312
-99%
0.892
-99%
236.8
80%
0.852
-99%
Read 4k QD32
125
1.126
-99%
0.847
-99%
333.4
167%
0.774
-99%
Write 4k
46.55
1.261
-97%
0.895
-98%
99.47
114%
0.855
-98%
Read 4k
17.04
0.415
-98%
0.451
-97%
36.82
116%
0.391
-98%
Write 512
281.2
53.66
-81%
42.75
-85%
299.6
7%
42.45
-85%
Read 512
261.9
36.71
-86%
36.46
-86%
414.6
58%
34.52
-87%
Write Seq
316.6
108.9
-66%
95.89
-70%
304.1
-4%
106.2
-66%
Read Seq
502.8
110.7
-78%
96.35
-81%
490.6
-2%
108.5
-78%
3DMark 06 Standard
8878 puntos
3DMark Vantage P Result
6853 puntos
3DMark 11 Performance
2979 puntos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
44367 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
5225 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1678 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
686 puntos
3DMark Time Spy Score
315 puntos
ayuda
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G
AMD Radeon R8 M365DX, AMD FX-8800P
3819 Points ∼7% +1%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, AMD A10-9600P
3775 Points ∼7%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
AMD Radeon R6 M340DX, AMD A10-8700P
2681 Points ∼5% -29%
Asus F555UB-XO043T
NVIDIA GeForce 940M, Intel Core i5-6200U
2336 Points ∼5% -38%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng
AMD Radeon R7 M440, AMD A10-9600P
2210 Points ∼4% -41%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275
NVIDIA GeForce 930M, Intel Core i5-6200U
2138 Points ∼4% -43%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
1835 Points ∼4% -51%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, AMD A10-9600P
2209 Points ∼6%
Asus F555UB-XO043T
NVIDIA GeForce 940M, Intel Core i5-6200U
1570 Points ∼4% -29%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275
NVIDIA GeForce 930M, Intel Core i5-6200U
1497 Points ∼4% -32%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
AMD Radeon R6 M340DX, AMD A10-8700P
1472 Points ∼4% -33%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng
AMD Radeon R7 M440, AMD A10-9600P
1205 Points ∼3% -45%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, AMD A10-9600P
12483 Points ∼8%
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G
AMD Radeon R8 M365DX, AMD FX-8800P
10534 Points ∼6% -16%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
AMD Radeon R6 M340DX, AMD A10-8700P
8935 Points ∼5% -28%
Asus F555UB-XO043T
NVIDIA GeForce 940M, Intel Core i5-6200U
8405 Points ∼5% -33%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275
NVIDIA GeForce 930M, Intel Core i5-6200U
8324 Points ∼5% -33%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng
AMD Radeon R7 M440, AMD A10-9600P
6127 Points ∼4% -51%
bajo medio alto ultra
Counter-Strike: GO (2012) 8277.871.750.3fps
Tomb Raider (2013) 83.655.746.321.8fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 72.742.933.711.7fps
Battlefield 4 (2013) 50.137.223.47.7fps
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014) 33.321.312.2fps
Alien: Isolation (2014) 51.642.728fps
F1 2014 (2014) 59423924fps
Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014) 40.827.89.6fps
Battlefield Hardline (2015) 37.729.3148.3fps
GTA V (2015) 54.652.411.7fps
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 19177fps
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) 6037.513.3fps
FIFA 16 (2015) 77.553.825fps
Anno 2205 (2015) 3617.87.4fps
Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 (2015) 38.126.211.7fps
Assassin's Creed Syndicate (2015) 15.913.16.6fps
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) 53.533.713.3fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 24.413.97.7fps
XCOM 2 (2016) 2285.2fps
Far Cry Primal (2016) 23109fps
The Division (2016) 23.315.17.1fps
Hitman 2016 (2016) 18.617.710.5fps
Need for Speed 2016 (2016) 25.622.611.79.5fps
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 14.276.2fps
Doom (2016) 22.412.88.3fps
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) 26.412.85.8fps
No Man's Sky (2016) 21.81810fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 15.110.95.4fps
BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 Medium Preset
Asus F555UB-XO043T
GeForce 940M, 6200U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024
48.3 fps ∼100% +13%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275
GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
47 fps ∼97% +10%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
Radeon R8 M445DX, A10-9600P
42.9 fps ∼89%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng
Radeon R7 M440, A10-9600P
42.8 fps ∼89% 0%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0
41.8 fps ∼87% -3%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
Radeon R6 M340DX, A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024
26.1 fps ∼54% -39%
Tomb Raider - 1366x768 Normal Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275
GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
58.4 fps ∼100% +5%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
Radeon R8 M445DX, A10-9600P
55.7 fps ∼95%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
Radeon R6 M340DX, A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024
45.3 fps ∼78% -19%
Battlefield 4 - 1024x768 Low Preset
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng
Radeon R7 M440, A10-9600P
51.6 fps ∼100% +3%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
Radeon R8 M445DX, A10-9600P
50.1 fps ∼97%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
Radeon R6 M340DX, A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024
40 fps ∼78% -20%
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G
Radeon R8 M365DX, FX-8800P, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPVX
36.4 fps ∼71% -27%
FIFA 16 - 1366x768 High Preset AA:2x MS
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
Radeon R8 M445DX, A10-9600P
53.8 fps ∼100%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
Radeon R6 M340DX, A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024
40.4 fps ∼75% -25%
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G
Radeon R8 M365DX, FX-8800P, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPVX (1280x720)
fps ∼0% -100%
GTA V - 1024x768 Lowest Settings possible
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0
60.7 fps ∼100% +11%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
Radeon R8 M445DX, A10-9600P
54.6 fps ∼90%
F1 2014 - 1920x1080 High Preset
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0
46 fps ∼100% +18%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
Radeon R8 M445DX, A10-9600P
39 fps ∼85%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
Radeon R6 M340DX, A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024
33 fps ∼72% -15%
Counter-Strike: GO - 1366x768 High AA:2x MS AF:4x
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
Radeon R8 M445DX, A10-9600P
71.7 fps ∼100%

Ruido

Ocioso
31.7 / 31.9 / 31.9 dB(A)
HDD
32.2 dB(A)
DVD
36.6 / dB(A)
Carga
41 / 42.7 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 31.2 dB(A)
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
A10-9600P, Radeon R8 M445DX
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G
FX-8800P, Radeon R8 M365DX
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
A10-8700P, Radeon R6 M340DX
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275
6200U, GeForce 930M
Asus F555UB-XO043T
6200U, GeForce 940M
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
6500U, GeForce 920MX
Noise
4%
0%
5%
-4%
-1%
Idle Minimum *
31.7
32.4
-2%
33.1
-4%
31.3
1%
34
-7%
32.6
-3%
Idle Average *
31.9
33.2
-4%
33.3
-4%
31.3
2%
34
-7%
32.6
-2%
Idle Maximum *
31.9
33.2
-4%
33.5
-5%
32.2
-1%
34.2
-7%
33.8
-6%
Load Average *
41
36.5
11%
38.9
5%
36.4
11%
38.9
5%
40.2
2%
Load Maximum *
42.7
34.4
19%
38.9
9%
36.6
14%
43.6
-2%
40.4
5%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.
 25 °C33 °C33.4 °C 
 25 °C28.1 °C29.1 °C 
 24 °C27 °C25.5 °C 
Máximo: 33.4 °C
Médio: 27.8 °C
32.1 °C32.4 °C26.1 °C
30.4 °C32.9 °C26.3 °C
24.7 °C27.8 °C25.9 °C
Máximo: 32.9 °C
Médio: 28.7 °C
Conector de corriente  41.6 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 22.3 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
A10-9600P, Radeon R8 M445DX
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G
FX-8800P, Radeon R8 M365DX
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
A10-8700P, Radeon R6 M340DX
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275
6200U, GeForce 930M
Asus F555UB-XO043T
6200U, GeForce 940M
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
6500U, GeForce 920MX
Heat
-5%
-4%
-13%
-8%
-10%
Maximum Upper Side *
33.4
34
-2%
36
-8%
42.5
-27%
33.2
1%
38.6
-16%
Maximum Bottom *
32.9
39.6
-20%
39.2
-19%
46.9
-43%
44
-34%
42
-28%
Idle Upper Side *
27.7
27.7
-0%
27.1
2%
25.8
7%
28.2
-2%
28.1
-1%
Idle Bottom *
29.4
29
1%
26.6
10%
26
12%
28.1
4%
28.1
4%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.334.22532.632.43133.235.14034.132.45035.634.76329.728.78028.527.110027.62812527.426.216029.425.220035.225.325036.723.331540.222.240054.121.150051.720.863055.2208005719.6100061.418.9125068.318.716006718.9200062.718.5250060.818.3315063.118.4400062.518.7500062.518.9630056.819.1800057191000059.1191250055.618.91600051.918.9SPL41.142.874.73231.331.4N3.43.931.51.71.61.6median 56.8HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EAmedian 19Delta10.52.135.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.2 / 0.65 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 5.5 / 8.2 / 9.5 Watt
Carga midlight 44.5 / 58 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
A10-9600P, Radeon R8 M445DX
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G
FX-8800P, Radeon R8 M365DX
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
A10-8700P, Radeon R6 M340DX
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275
6200U, GeForce 930M
Asus F555UB-XO043T
6200U, GeForce 940M
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
6500U, GeForce 920MX
Power Consumption
-2%
-10%
4%
13%
2%
Idle Minimum *
5.5
6.7
-22%
6.8
-24%
4.7
15%
4.7
15%
7
-27%
Idle Average *
8.2
9.8
-20%
10.5
-28%
9.9
-21%
6.5
21%
8
2%
Idle Maximum *
9.5
10.6
-12%
11
-16%
10.1
-6%
6.8
28%
8.4
12%
Load Average *
44.5
46
-3%
41.6
7%
36
19%
42.7
4%
38.8
13%
Load Maximum *
58
32
45%
51
12%
51
12%
59
-2%
52.8
9%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
9h 20min
Navegando con WLAN v1.3 (Edge 38)
4h 20min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
3h 14min
Carga (máximo brillo)
1h 35min
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
41 Wh
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G
37 Wh
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
32 Wh
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275
45 Wh
Asus F555UB-XO043T
37 Wh
Duración de Batería
-32%
-32%
33%
37%
Reader / Idle
560
400
-29%
365
-35%
Load
95
49
-48%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
260
168
-35%
183
-30%
345
33%
355
37%
H.264
194
168
-13%

Pro

+ pantalla mate
+ FHD
+ veloz SSD
+ apenas se calienta

Contra

- sólo 12 meses de garantía
- sin escotilla de mantenimiento
- sin USB Type-C
- aguante de batería mediocre
- muy poco brillo en batería
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Notebooksbilliger.de
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Notebooksbilliger.de

El procesador AMD del modelo de pruebas ofrece suficiente rendimiento para el uso diario. Lo que es más, el portátil es quedo la mayor parte del tiempo y apenas se calienta. Un veloz SSD asegura que el sistema vaya fluido. Por desgracia, el portátil no tiene escotilla de mantenimiento. Para cambiar el SSD hay que abrir la carcasa. El teclado basta para el uso doméstico y el aguante de batería no tiene nada de especial. El Pavilion podría haber sido mejor en estas áreas.

Por unos 550 Euros, el Pavilion 15-aw004ng es un buen todoterreno para los usuarios con necesidades básicas.

Por un precio relativamente bajo, HP incluye un display FHD y un sistema de doble gráfica. Por otro lado, el panel no es muy brillante y tiene poco ángulo de visión y contraste. El sistema en sí está cubierto por una garantía de 1 año. Con todo, HP ofrece un portátil de 15.6" de bajo precio con claros defectos, que puede resultar útil para algunos usuarios.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA - 09/22/PM v5.1
Sascha Mölck

Acabado
73 / 98 → 74%
Teclado
73%
Ratón
81%
Conectividad
40 / 81 → 49%
Peso
63 / 67 → 91%
Battería
73%
Pantalla
76%
Rendimiento de juegos
59 / 85 → 70%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
71 / 92 → 77%
Temperatura
95%
Ruido
84 / 95 → 88%
Audio
54%
Cámara
40 / 85 → 47%
Médio
68%
75%
Multimedia - media ponderada

Pricecompare

> Español - Home > Análisis > Breve análisis del HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng
Sascha Mölck, 2016-09-29 (Update: 2016-09-29)