Deutsch
English
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve análisis del Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK (80TK003KGE)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
| HP Envy 13-d020ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
| Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
| HP Envy 13-d020ng | |
| Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
| Networking | |
| iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
| iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 90 %
Brillo con batería: 257 cd/m²
Contraste: 1071:1 (Negro: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.44 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.95 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
64% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
44.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
42.88% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK NV140FHM-N41, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK Chi Mei CMN14A7, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Asus X302UV-FN016T InfoVision M133NWN1 R3, 1366x768, 13.30 | Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW LG LP133WF2-SPL3, 1920x1080, 13.30 | HP Envy 13-d020ng AU Optronics AUO272D, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK LG Display LP133WF2-SPL3, 1920x1080, 13.30 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -5% | 13% | -9% | 47% | -9% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 42.88 | 40.74 -5% | 48.37 13% | 39.18 -9% | 63.7 49% | 39.05 -9% |
| sRGB Coverage | 64.1 | 60.6 -5% | 72.6 13% | 58.6 -9% | 93 45% | 58.7 -8% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 44.3 | 42.15 -5% | 49.98 13% | 40.51 -9% | 65.1 47% | 40.35 -9% |
| Response Times | 8% | 6% | -12% | 116% | 3% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 45 ? | 43 ? 4% | 42 ? 7% | 41 ? 9% | 34 ? 24% | 46 ? -2% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 26 ? | 23 ? 12% | 23 ? 12% | 34.4 ? -32% | 24 ? 8% | 24 ? 8% |
| PWM Frequency | 50 ? | 50 ? 0% | 208 ? 316% | |||
| Screen | -43% | -14% | -21% | 17% | -13% | |
| Brightness middle | 257 | 249 -3% | 218 -15% | 247 -4% | 345 34% | 250 -3% |
| Brightness | 263 | 235 -11% | 210 -20% | 239 -9% | 335 27% | 247 -6% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 87 -3% | 88 -2% | 81 -10% | 95 6% | 87 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.44 -83% | 0.5 -108% | 0.38 -58% | 0.25 -4% | 0.43 -79% |
| Contrast | 1071 | 566 -47% | 436 -59% | 650 -39% | 1380 29% | 581 -46% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.44 | 9.47 -74% | 3.89 28% | 5.95 -9% | 4.94 9% | 4.51 17% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.93 | 15.41 -41% | 7.11 35% | 14.2 -30% | 8.85 19% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.95 | 10.22 -159% | 4.9 -24% | 5.25 -33% | 5.85 -48% | 3.18 19% |
| Gamma | 2.29 96% | 2.34 94% | 2.41 91% | 2.42 91% | 2.25 98% | 2.43 91% |
| CCT | 6896 94% | 11451 57% | 7860 83% | 6736 96% | 7105 91% | 6743 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 40 | 39 -2% | 46 15% | 37.28 -7% | 60 50% | 37 -7% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 64 | 57 -11% | 73 14% | 58.37 -9% | 93 45% | 58 -9% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -13% /
-29% | 2% /
-5% | -14% /
-17% | 60% /
41% | -6% /
-10% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 7 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 19 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 57 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21.5 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 45 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 17 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 28 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 73 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (33.7 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 50 Hz | ≤ 60 % de brillo |  |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 50 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 60 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 50 Hz es bajísima, por lo que el parpadeo puede causar fatiga visual y cefaleas cuando se usa mucho tiempo. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 17924 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 3846000) Hz. | |||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
| Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
| HP Envy 13-d020ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
| Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
| HP Envy 13-d020ng | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
| HP Envy 13-d020ng | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
| Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| PCMark 7 Score | 5340 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3710 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4327 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4579 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK Samsung MZYTY256HDHP | Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP | Asus X302UV-FN016T Hynix HFS128G3MND | Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2 | HP Envy 13-d020ng Samsung MZRPC256HADR-000SO | Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -4% | -40% | -7% | -13% | -11% | |
| Read Seq | 510 | 507 -1% | 428.2 -16% | 515 1% | 478.7 -6% | 522 2% |
| Write Seq | 458.8 | 309.5 -33% | 178.6 -61% | 338 -26% | 268.5 -41% | 447.4 -2% |
| Read 512 | 399.7 | 409.5 2% | 282.6 -29% | 368.1 -8% | 386.6 -3% | 392.3 -2% |
| Write 512 | 299.3 | 308.3 3% | 179.1 -40% | 338.6 13% | 268.8 -10% | 388 30% |
| Read 4k | 35.27 | 36.24 3% | 6.559 -81% | 28.88 -18% | 26.88 -24% | 21.1 -40% |
| Write 4k | 90.2 | 93.3 3% | 71.2 -21% | 74.2 -18% | 78.7 -13% | 71.1 -21% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 397.7 | 394.5 -1% | 253 -36% | 319.9 -20% | 369.4 -7% | 248 -38% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 257.3 | 241.6 -6% | 174 -32% | 309.4 20% | 259.7 1% | 212.9 -17% |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
| Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
| HP Envy 13-d020ng | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
| Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
| HP Envy 13-d020ng | |
| 1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
| Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
| HP Envy 13-d020ng | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1943 puntos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 60650 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6252 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 968 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 414 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 61.3 | 34 | 29 | 7.8 |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 59.9 | 33.4 | 24.8 | 8.2 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 23.6 | 16.2 | 9.5 | 4.3 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 32.2 / 32.2 / 32.3 dB(A) |
| HDD |
| 32.2 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 38.4 / 39.9 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 31.2 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK Intel Core i5-6267U, Iris Graphics 550 | Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK Intel Core i7-6500U, GeForce 940M | Asus X302UV-FN016T Intel Core i5-6200U, GeForce 920MX | Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW Intel Core i5-6267U, Iris Graphics 550 | HP Envy 13-d020ng Intel Core i5-6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK Intel Core i5-6200U, HD Graphics 520 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 2% | 4% | 2% | 3% | 8% | |
| off / environment * | 31.2 | 31.3 -0% | 31.2 -0% | 29.1 7% | ||
| Idle Minimum * | 32.2 | 31.3 3% | 32.9 -2% | 29.1 10% | 32.5 -1% | 31.5 2% |
| Idle Average * | 32.2 | 31.7 2% | 32.9 -2% | 29.1 10% | 32.5 -1% | 31.5 2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 32.3 | 31.8 2% | 33 -2% | 29.1 10% | 32.4 -0% | 31.5 2% |
| Load Average * | 38.4 | 36.7 4% | 33 14% | 41.1 -7% | 36 6% | 32.4 16% |
| Load Maximum * | 39.9 | 39.4 1% | 34.6 13% | 46.4 -16% | 36.5 9% | 32.3 19% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.3 °C / 82.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (0 °C / 0 F).
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.3 / 0.5 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.9 / 7.1 / 8.8 Watt |
| Carga |
27.6 / 30.2 Watt |
   
| |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 14.00 | Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK 6500U, GeForce 940M, 14.00 | Asus X302UV-FN016T 6200U, GeForce 920MX, 13.30 | Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 13.30 | HP Envy 13-d020ng 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 13.30 | Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 13.30 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -20% | 6% | -17% | -13% | 3% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.9 | 3.8 3% | 3.3 15% | 3.4 13% | 4.2 -8% | 3.8 3% |
| Idle Average * | 7.1 | 7.2 -1% | 5.1 28% | 6.5 8% | 7.4 -4% | 5.8 18% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.8 | 7.6 14% | 5.2 41% | 7 20% | 10.1 -15% | 8.1 8% |
| Load Average * | 27.6 | 40 -45% | 29.5 -7% | 44.5 -61% | 33.4 -21% | 30.2 -9% |
| Load Maximum * | 30.2 | 52 -72% | 44 -46% | 49.5 -64% | 34.7 -15% | 32.4 -7% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 30 Wh | Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK 6500U, GeForce 940M, 30 Wh | Asus X302UV-FN016T 6200U, GeForce 920MX, 38 Wh | Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 51 Wh | HP Envy 13-d020ng 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 45 Wh | Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 51 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | -27% | 2% | 58% | -1% | 23% | |
| Reader / Idle | 638 | 346 -46% | 1035 62% | 906 42% | ||
| H.264 | 231 | 246 6% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 384 | 257 -33% | 392 2% | 412 7% | 381 -1% | 349 -9% |
| Load | 100 | 64 -36% | 206 106% | 135 35% |
Pro
Contra
Lenovo presenta un subportátil atractivo al mercado con su IdeaPad 510S-14ISK. Su buena relación precio-rendimiento debería atraer a algunos compradores. El cliente se lleva un dispositivo de 14" en una carcasa rígida que alberga dispositivos de entrada decentes por 799 Euros. El panel Full HD IPS tiene un estable ángulo de visión y ofrece una buena reproducción de imagen con iluminación homogénea. La Intel Core i5-6267U que también integra Intel Iris Graphics 550 tiene bastante reservas de potencia para el uso rutinario.
Lenovo ha hecho un buen trabajo con el IdeaPad 510S-14ISK en muchos aspectos. Sin embargo, los usuarios que suelan viajar mucho y necesiten un dispositivo con mucho aguante no quedarán contentos a la larga con el IdeaPad 510S-14ISK.
Lo malo sigue naturalmente a lo bueno, y hay algunos puntos de crítica que resumiremos aquí:
Lo primero que notamos desfavorablemente es el aguante de la batería. Al menos debería tener una capacidad de 45-50 Wh para ofrecer periodos sin enchufe más largos. El rendimiento total de CPU y GPU no puede usarse por completo. El Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW basado en una configuracion hardware similar es mucho más rápido en ciertos casos. Sin embargo, eso no quiere decir que el IdeaPad 510S-14ISK sea lento. Las pérdidas de rendimiento son sólo evidentes en las pruebas y apenas causan diferencia en el uso rutinario. Además de eso, la sétima generación de procesadores Intel Core saldrá en un futuro próximo. Lenovo ya lo anuncia en su tienda online.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
-
09/17/2016 v5.1(old)
Sebastian Bade