Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del Smartphone Acer Liquid Zest Plus

Marcus Herbrich (traducido por Francisco García), 09/21/PM

Batería gigante. Los taiwaneses de Acer anuncian su Liquid Zest Plus como accesorio para viajes: Gran aguante de batería, y audio y cámara de gran calidad deberían hacer del gama media un compañero de viaje ideal. Descubre en nuestro test si esto es cierto.

Acer Liquid Zest Plus (Liquid Serie)
Procesador
Mediatek MT6735 1.3 GHz
Adaptador gráfico
Memoría
2048 MB 
pantalla
5.5 pulgadas 16:9, 1280x720 pixels 267 PPI, capacitiva, LCD, IPS, lustroso: si
Disco duro
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.99 GB libre
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, Audio Conexiones: clavija headset 3.5mm, Card Reader: micro SD , Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerómetro, giroscopio, Hall, proximidad, Mircacast, OTG
Equipamento de red
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0, 2G: 850 MHz, 900 MHz ,1800 MHz, 1900 MHz; 3G: 850 MHz, 900 MHz, 1900 MHz, 2100 MHz; LTE: 800 MHz, 1800 MHz, 2100 MHz, 2600 MHz , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 9.8 x 154.3 x 77.4
Battería
5000 mAh Litio-Polimero, Duración de la Batería (según el fabricante): 1100 h, Tiempo de Conversación 2G (según el fabricante): 24 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Características adicionales
Altavoces: mono, Teclado: virtual, Luz de Teclado: si, adaptador modular de corriente, guía, cable USB, Acer UI, 24 Meses Garantía, SAR rate: 0.603 W/kg (body), fanless
Peso
175 g, Suministro de Electricidad: 41 g
Precio
200 Euros

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
303 MBit/s ∼100% +537%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash (2.4 GHz)
47.6 MBit/s ∼16%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
290 MBit/s ∼100% +480%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash (2.4 GHz)
50 MBit/s ∼17%
GPS Acer Liquid Zest Plus
GPS Acer Liquid Zest Plus
GPS Acer Liquid Zest Plus
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500

Comparación de Imágenes

Elige una escena y navega dentro de la primera imagen. Un click cambia el nivel de zoom. Un click en la imagen aumentada abre la original en una ventana nueva. La primera imagen muestra la fotografía escalada del dispositivo de pruebas.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
412
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
420
cd/m²
411
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
424
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
437
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 437 cd/m² Médio: 419.7 cd/m² Minimum: 15.19 cd/m²
iluminación: 94 %
Brillo con batería: 414 cd/m²
Contraste: 1255:1 (Negro: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.1 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 9.6 | - Ø
Gamma: 2
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Acer Liquid Z630S
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Leagoo Shark 1
IPS, 1920x1080, 6
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Archos 50 Power
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Screen
13%
-33%
3%
4%
48%
Brightness
420
345
-18%
465
11%
566
35%
311
-26%
552
31%
Brightness Distribution
94
84
-11%
82
-13%
84
-11%
83
-12%
96
2%
Black Level *
0.33
0.27
18%
0.9
-173%
0.57
-73%
0.31
6%
Contrast
1255
1296
3%
523
-58%
1028
-18%
981
-22%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
8.1
4.7
42%
7.1
12%
4.2
48%
5.9
27%
1.59
80%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
9.6
5.6
42%
7.5
22%
6.3
34%
4.6
52%
2.01
79%
Gamma
2 120%
1.84 130%
2.23 108%
2.39 100%
2.51 96%
2.01 119%
CCT
7754 84%
6795 96%
8261 79%
6614 98%
7088 92%
6321 103%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
82.12
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.98

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
28 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 10 ms subida
↘ 18 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 57 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (27.4 ms).
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
36 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 14 ms subida
↘ 22 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 26 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (44.4 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 60 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 655 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 28740) Hz.

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
Acer Liquid Zest Plus (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
16.17 MB/s ∼25%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
18.93 MB/s ∼29% +17%
Archos 50 Power
MB/s ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
50.36 MB/s ∼77% +211%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
Acer Liquid Zest Plus (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
27.68 MB/s ∼33%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
38.43 MB/s ∼46% +39%
Archos 50 Power
MB/s ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
76.43 MB/s ∼92% +176%
Random Write 4KB (ordenar por valor)
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
7.95 MB/s ∼11%
Acer Liquid Z630S
5.82 MB/s ∼8% -27%
Leagoo Shark 1
6.4 MB/s ∼9% -19%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
3.6 MB/s ∼5% -55%
Archos 50 Power
8.78 MB/s ∼12% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15.79 MB/s ∼21% +99%
Random Read 4KB (ordenar por valor)
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
20.25 MB/s ∼15%
Acer Liquid Z630S
28.43 MB/s ∼21% +40%
Leagoo Shark 1
29.6 MB/s ∼22% +46%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
9.1 MB/s ∼7% -55%
Archos 50 Power
26.47 MB/s ∼19% +31%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
86.71 MB/s ∼63% +328%
Sequential Write 256KB (ordenar por valor)
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
39.51 MB/s ∼21%
Acer Liquid Z630S
67.7 MB/s ∼36% +71%
Leagoo Shark 1
39.6 MB/s ∼21% 0%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
31.1 MB/s ∼17% -21%
Archos 50 Power
41.43 MB/s ∼22% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
145.11 MB/s ∼77% +267%
Sequential Read 256KB (ordenar por valor)
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
178.65 MB/s ∼30%
Acer Liquid Z630S
249.01 MB/s ∼42% +39%
Leagoo Shark 1
264.1 MB/s ∼44% +48%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
130.6 MB/s ∼22% -27%
Archos 50 Power
199.7 MB/s ∼34% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
487.34 MB/s ∼82% +173%
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
30676 Points ∼17%
Acer Liquid Z630S
35585 Points ∼19% +16%
Leagoo Shark 1
34261 Points ∼19% +12%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
26169 Points ∼14% -15%
Archos 50 Power
23996 Points ∼13% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
128749 Points ∼70% +320%
3DMark
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordenar por valor)
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
831 Points ∼32%
Acer Liquid Z630S
1113 Points ∼43% +34%
Leagoo Shark 1
890 Points ∼34% +7%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
719 Points ∼28% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2002 (min: 1539) Points ∼77% +141%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
172 Points ∼2%
Acer Liquid Z630S
229 Points ∼3% +33%
Leagoo Shark 1
232 Points ∼3% +35%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
42 Points ∼1% -76%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3015 (min: 2895) Points ∼39% +1653%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordenar por valor)
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
209 Points ∼4%
Acer Liquid Z630S
278 Points ∼6% +33%
Leagoo Shark 1
278 Points ∼6% +33%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
53 Points ∼1% -75%
Archos 50 Power
122 Points ∼3% -42%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2710 (min: 2421) Points ∼56% +1197%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordenar por valor)
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
9768 Points ∼14%
Acer Liquid Z630S
10508 Points ∼16% +8%
Leagoo Shark 1
10325 Points ∼15% +6%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
9043 Points ∼13% -7%
Archos 50 Power
6981 Points ∼10% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
19610 Points ∼29% +101%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordenar por valor)
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
4333 Points ∼1%
Acer Liquid Z630S
6250 Points ∼1% +44%
Leagoo Shark 1
4920 Points ∼1% +14%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
3767 Points ∼1% -13%
Archos 50 Power
2581 Points ∼1% -40%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
33031 Points ∼7% +662%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordenar por valor)
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
4944 Points ∼3%
Acer Liquid Z630S
6868 Points ∼3% +39%
Leagoo Shark 1
5568 Points ∼3% +13%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
4328 Points ∼2% -12%
Archos 50 Power
3001 Points ∼2% -39%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28671 Points ∼15% +480%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
14 fps ∼1%
Acer Liquid Z630S
12 fps ∼1% -14%
Leagoo Shark 1
8.9 fps ∼1% -36%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
5.2 fps ∼0% -63%
Archos 50 Power
4.9 fps ∼0% -65%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
81 fps ∼7% +479%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
8.4 fps ∼2%
Acer Liquid Z630S
21 fps ∼5% +150%
Leagoo Shark 1
8.7 fps ∼2% +4%
Archos 50 Power
8.6 fps ∼2% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
51 fps ∼11% +507%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
6 fps ∼1%
Acer Liquid Z630S
4.2 fps ∼1% -30%
Leagoo Shark 1
4.2 fps ∼1% -30%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
3.8 fps ∼1% -37%
Archos 50 Power
1.6 fps ∼0% -73%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
38 fps ∼7% +533%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
3 fps ∼1%
Acer Liquid Z630S
9 fps ∼4% +200%
Leagoo Shark 1
3.9 fps ∼2% +30%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
1.8 fps ∼1% -40%
Archos 50 Power
3.6 fps ∼2% +20%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
27 fps ∼12% +800%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
4.4 fps ∼1%
Leagoo Shark 1
2.5 fps ∼1% -43%
Archos 50 Power
0.87 fps ∼0% -80%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28 fps ∼9% +536%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
1.9 fps ∼1%
Leagoo Shark 1
2.2 fps ∼1% +16%
Archos 50 Power
2.5 fps ∼1% +32%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps ∼9% +689%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor)
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
3813 Points ∼47%
Acer Liquid Z630S
3814 Points ∼47% 0%
Leagoo Shark 1
3398 Points ∼42% -11%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
3691 Points ∼45% -3%
Archos 50 Power
2824 Points ∼35% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4660 Points ∼57% +22%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordenar por valor)
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
10 Points ∼1%
Acer Liquid Z630S
627 Points ∼41% +6170%
Leagoo Shark 1
611 Points ∼40% +6010%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
544 Points ∼35% +5340%
Archos 50 Power
9 Points ∼1% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
994 Points ∼64% +9840%
Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
286 Points ∼3%
Acer Liquid Z630S
416 Points ∼5% +45%
Leagoo Shark 1
418 Points ∼5% +46%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
317 Points ∼4% +11%
Archos 50 Power
173 Points ∼2% -40%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2203 Points ∼26% +670%
Memory (ordenar por valor)
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
450 Points ∼12%
Acer Liquid Z630S
540 Points ∼14% +20%
Leagoo Shark 1
515 Points ∼13% +14%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
797 Points ∼21% +77%
Archos 50 Power
643 Points ∼17% +43%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2072 Points ∼54% +360%
System (ordenar por valor)
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
1090 Points ∼17%
Acer Liquid Z630S
1614 Points ∼25% +48%
Leagoo Shark 1
1195 Points ∼18% +10%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
1088 Points ∼17% 0%
Archos 50 Power
911 Points ∼14% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4080 Points ∼62% +274%
Overall (ordenar por valor)
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
192 Points ∼6%
Acer Liquid Z630S
691 Points ∼21% +260%
Leagoo Shark 1
597 Points ∼18% +211%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
622 Points ∼19% +224%
Archos 50 Power
176 Points ∼5% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2074 Points ∼63% +980%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Acer Liquid Zest Plus (die Abstrahlung von blauem Licht)
12910 ms * ∼22%
Acer Liquid Z630S (Chrome Version 49)
12876 ms * ∼22% -0%
Leagoo Shark 1 (Chrome Version 50)
14787.9 ms * ∼25% -15%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL (Chrome Version 50)
13524.7 ms * ∼23% -5%
Archos 50 Power (Google Chrome 50.0.2661.89)
18480.5 ms * ∼31% -43%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Samsung Browser 4.0.01-81)
2564.1 ms * ∼4% +80%
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Acer Liquid Zest Plus (die Abstrahlung von blauem Licht)
2697 Points ∼5%
Acer Liquid Z630S (Chrome Version 49)
2855 Points ∼6% +6%
Leagoo Shark 1 (Chrome Version 50)
2992 Points ∼6% +11%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL (Chrome Version 50)
2685 Points ∼5% 0%
Archos 50 Power (Google Chrome 50.0.2661.89)
2116 Points ∼4% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Samsung Browser 4.0.01-81)
13191 Points ∼27% +389%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Acer Liquid Zest Plus (Chrome Version 52)
18.028 Points ∼6%
Acer Liquid Z630S (Chrome Version 49)
19.028 Points ∼6% +6%
Leagoo Shark 1 (Chrome Version 50)
17.242 Points ∼5% -4%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL (Chrome Version 50)
17.533 Points ∼5% -3%
Archos 50 Power (Google Chrome 50.0.2661.89)
13.16 Points ∼4% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Samsung Browser 4.0.01-81)
75.12 Points ∼24% +317%

Leyenda

 
Acer Liquid Zest Plus Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Acer Liquid Z630S Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Leagoo Shark 1 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Archos 50 Power Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.
 42.5 °C42.6 °C45.1 °C 
 43.1 °C43.7 °C44.3 °C 
 43.1 °C42.9 °C42.5 °C 
Máximo: 45.1 °C
Médio: 43.3 °C
39.1 °C40.6 °C41.4 °C
39.2 °C40.8 °C41.8 °C
37.8 °C40.2 °C41.5 °C
Máximo: 41.8 °C
Médio: 40.3 °C
Conector de corriente  37.4 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.435.62531.335.23131.735.8402627.65039.436.26336.234.28028.627.710025.425.112521.32316023.326.120022.532.225022.440.131521.346.440018.454.650017.563.263017.564.380017.268.3100016.871.1125017.372.8160017.472200016.673.1250017.373315017.672.9400017.674.1500017.772.7630017.473.1800017.772.91000017.972.11250018.173.91600018.175.8SPL29.884.3N1.357.6median 17.7Acer Liquid Zest Plusmedian 72Delta1.61240.433.132.440.436.935.631.336.931.428.931.731.431.227.32631.236.935.639.436.931.127.936.231.130.223.228.630.223.924.525.423.924.624.221.324.62622.123.32632.129.122.532.141.938.122.441.952.545.521.352.555.852.618.455.863.859.617.563.870.367.217.570.370.96917.270.975.773.616.875.775.373.417.375.376.372.517.476.377.374.416.677.376.87417.376.875.671.917.675.6747117.67473.571.217.773.573.270.417.473.270.266.717.770.270.367.117.970.363.660.418.163.652.148.718.152.186.583.629.886.564.754.41.364.7median 70.3Acer Liquid Z630Smedian 67.1median 17.7median 70.31313.21.61335.342.132.435.331.13031.331.134.630.731.734.633.733.62633.737.436.639.437.434.526.836.234.527.626.728.627.626.124.325.426.124.626.121.324.624.222.723.324.221.620.922.521.626.921.722.426.937.730.521.337.747.441.418.447.459.652.917.559.668.96217.568.975.869.817.275.875.369.816.875.370.165.117.370.166.761.317.466.766.460.216.666.467.66117.367.666.961.317.666.967.862.117.667.869.963.917.769.974.96917.474.980.57517.780.581.676.717.981.671.866.918.171.855.65018.155.685.680.129.885.659.2421.359.2median 66.9Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KLmedian 61.3median 17.7median 66.913.813.91.613.832.633.332.432.635.933.431.335.935.124.931.735.135.130.82635.140.137.339.440.132.429.336.232.4272428.62725.227.525.425.224.727.221.324.72723.523.32729.523.322.529.540.425.722.440.448.728.121.348.755.235.518.455.263.343.317.563.367.747.717.567.774.754.717.274.776.75816.876.775.156.217.375.173.153.917.473.17352.716.67371.451.417.371.471.751.717.671.772.751.517.672.774.654.517.774.674.854.617.474.87353.117.77371.85217.971.864.944.718.164.949.729.618.149.785.265.529.885.262.218.61.362.2median 71.4Archos 50 Powermedian 51.4median 17.7median 71.41310.51.613hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Acer Liquid Zest Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.28 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Acer Liquid Z630S audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.45 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 36.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.57 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 40.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Archos 50 Power audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.16 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 38.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.04 / 0.25 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.83 / 2.06 / 2.08 Watt
Carga midlight 3.53 / 4.49 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
5000 mAh
Acer Liquid Z630S
4000 mAh
Leagoo Shark 1
6300 mAh
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
5000 mAh
Archos 50 Power
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3600 mAh
Power Consumption
-39%
-52%
-26%
-43%
-4%
Idle Minimum *
0.83
1.82
-119%
0.59
29%
1.15
-39%
1.66
-100%
0.63
24%
Idle Average *
2.06
2.35
-14%
3.22
-56%
2.09
-1%
2.88
-40%
1.1
47%
Idle Maximum *
2.08
2.6
-25%
3.45
-66%
2.17
-4%
3.46
-66%
1.56
25%
Load Average *
3.53
3.69
-5%
6.93
-96%
5.38
-52%
3.96
-12%
5.95
-69%
Load Maximum *
4.49
5.98
-33%
7.59
-69%
6.08
-35%
4.34
3%
6.7
-49%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Navegando con WLAN v1.3
13h 35min
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
5000 mAh
Acer Liquid Z630S
4000 mAh
Leagoo Shark 1
6300 mAh
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
5000 mAh
Archos 50 Power
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3600 mAh
Duración de Batería
-16%
-33%
18%
-27%
-10%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
815
681
-16%
542
-33%
959
18%
592
-27%
732
-10%

Pro

+ gran aguante de batería
+ panel IPS de gran contraste
+ dual-SIM
+ ampliación del almacenamiento
+ reproducción de música (altavoz/clavija 3.5-mm)

Contra

- la cámara tiende a la sobreexposición
- rendimiento
- almacenamiento eMMC lento
- dimensiones del dispositivo
Acer Liquid Zest Plus. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de notebooksbilliger.de
Acer Liquid Zest Plus. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de notebooksbilliger.de

El Acer Liquid Zest Plus se nos presentó en el test como un smartphone de gama media decente  del nivel de precios más bajo.

Los usuarios que dependan de un gran aguante de batería descubrirán en el Acer Liquid Zest Plus una buena alternativa a smartphones con aguante existentes en el mercado. Los demás pueden encontrar modelos mejores y de más calidad, tales como ZTE Blade V7 o Honor 5C, por un PVP de unos 200 Euros.

Tenemos que destacar en particular el panel IPS de gran contraste, la decente calidad de la reproducción de música por altavoces y por clavija 3.5-mm, la funcionalidad dual-SIM, y el gran aguante de batería en el test WiFi. Esto último, empero, se logra a costa del rendimiento (SoC débil) y una configuración técnica superior  (720p vs. 1080p) - ninguna de esas características son adecuadas hoy día para un dispositivo de 5.5" y 200 Euros. Lo que es más, a la carcasa de plástico le falta algo de calidad al tacto comparada con smartphones de metal o vidrio.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Acer Liquid Zest Plus - 09/14/AM v5.1
Marcus Herbrich

Acabado
81%
Teclado
69 / 75 → 92%
Ratón
91%
Conectividad
43 / 60 → 72%
Peso
90%
Battería
97%
Pantalla
81%
Rendimiento de juegos
14 / 63 → 22%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
29 / 70 → 42%
Temperatura
82%
Ruido
100%
Audio
73 / 91 → 80%
Cámara
68%
Médio
71%
82%
Smartphone - media ponderada

Pricecompare

> Español - página inicial > Análisis > Breve análisis del Smartphone Acer Liquid Zest Plus
Marcus Herbrich, 2016-09-21 (Update: 2016-09-21)