Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del Smartphone Asus ZenFone 3 ZE552KL

Manuel Masiero (traducido por Francisco García), 11/02/PM

Pieza de diseño. Asus ha regalado un look premium al ZenFone 3 de 5.5" manteniendo en mente el rendimiento y la configuración. El resultado es un buen y asequible smartphone gama media que apenas muestra algún defecto en el test.

Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Zenfone Serie)
Procesador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 2 GHz
Adaptador gráfico
Qualcomm Adreno 506, Núcleo: 650 MHz
Memoría
4096 MB 
, LPDDR3
pantalla
5.5 pulgadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixels 401 PPI, capacitiva, multitáctil, 10 puntos, modo guante, IPS, filtro de luz azul, lustroso: si
Disco duro
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 51.7 GB libre
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Audio Conexiones: clavija headset 3.5mm, Card Reader: micro-SD max. 2 TB, 1 Lector de Huellas Digitales, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerómetro, giroscopio, proximidad, brújula, Wi-Fi Direct, USB-OTG, DLNA, Miracast, Qualcomm Quick Charge 3.0
Equipamento de red
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (850, ​900, ​1900, ​2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 4 (800, 850, 900, 1800, 1900, 2100, 2600 MHz), max. download 150 MBit/s, max. upload 50 MBit/s, SAR: 0.493 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 7.7 x 152.6 x 77.4
Battería
3000 mAh Litio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0, flash dual-LED, autofocus, HDR, estabilizador de imagen óptico, grabación de vídeo 4k (3840 x 2160 Pixel)/1080p/720p a 30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, max. grabación de vídeo 1080p a 30 fps
Características adicionales
Altavoces: mono, Teclado: virtual, Luz de Teclado: si, cable USB Type-C, adaptador modular de corriente, intraauricular, guía de inicio rápido, Asus ZenUI 3.0, 24 Meses Garantía, USB Type-C, fanless
Peso
155 g, Suministro de Electricidad: 35 g
Precio
359 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
337 MBit/s ∼100% +924%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
320 MBit/s ∼95% +873%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
32.9 MBit/s ∼10%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
323 MBit/s ∼100% +935%
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
298 MBit/s ∼92% +855%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
31.2 MBit/s ∼10%
Asus Zenfone 3: Total route
Asus Zenfone 3: Total route
Asus Zenfone 3: Turning point
Asus Zenfone 3: Turning point
Asus Zenfone 3: Bridge
Asus Zenfone 3: Bridge
Garmin Edge 500: Total route
Garmin Edge 500: Total route
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Bridge
Garmin Edge 500: Bridge

Comparación de Imágenes

Elige una escena y navega dentro de la primera imagen. Un click cambia el nivel de zoom. Un click en la imagen aumentada abre la original en una ventana nueva. La primera imagen muestra la fotografía escalada del dispositivo de pruebas.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
635
cd/m²
634
cd/m²
651
cd/m²
630
cd/m²
658
cd/m²
636
cd/m²
625
cd/m²
610
cd/m²
620
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 658 cd/m² Médio: 633.2 cd/m² Minimum: 5.22 cd/m²
iluminación: 93 %
Brillo con batería: 658 cd/m²
Contraste: 997:1 (Negro: 0.66 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.9 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.26
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
OnePlus 3
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2
Honor 8
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
ZTE Axon 7
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Screen
4%
22%
-1%
2%
Brightness
633
431
-32%
380
-40%
443
-30%
334
-47%
Brightness Distribution
93
84
-10%
91
-2%
93
0%
88
-5%
Black Level *
0.66
0.4
39%
Contrast
997
1128
13%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.9
4.1
16%
1.95
60%
5.4
-10%
4.6
6%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.8
3.3
43%
1.86
68%
6.7
-16%
2.8
52%
Gamma
2.26 106%
2.1 114%
2.13 113%
2.33 103%
2.29 105%
CCT
7840 83%
6550 99%
6376 102%
8262 79%
6612 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
89.38
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
36 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 15 ms subida
↘ 21 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 88 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (27.3 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
56 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 17 ms subida
↘ 39 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 276 (máximo) ms. » 88 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (43 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 59 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 655 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 28740) Hz.

AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (6.2.1)
62484 Points ∼34%
ZTE Axon 7
122524 Points ∼66% +96%
Honor 8
94671 Points ∼51% +52%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
41676 Points ∼23% -33%
OnePlus 3 (Version 6.1.4)
142090 Points ∼77% +127%
Geekbench 4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
4042 Points ∼19%
ZTE Axon 7
3867 Points ∼18% -4%
Honor 8
5481 Points ∼26% +36%
OnePlus 3
4097 Points ∼19% +1%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
820 Points ∼16%
ZTE Axon 7
1280 Points ∼25% +56%
Honor 8
1726 Points ∼34% +110%
OnePlus 3
1754 Points ∼34% +114%
3DMark
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordenar por valor)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2112 Points ∼82%
ZTE Axon 7
1099 Points ∼42% -48%
Honor 8
2587 Points ∼100% +22%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
1479 Points ∼57% -30%
OnePlus 3
1789 Points ∼69% -15%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
719 Points ∼9%
ZTE Axon 7
4619 Points ∼60% +542%
Honor 8
1112 Points ∼14% +55%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
275 Points ∼4% -62%
OnePlus 3
4633 Points ∼60% +544%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordenar por valor)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
842 Points ∼17%
ZTE Axon 7
2698 Points ∼55% +220%
Honor 8
1273 Points ∼26% +51%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
336 Points ∼7% -60%
OnePlus 3
3424 Points ∼70% +307%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordenar por valor)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
15984 Points ∼24%
ZTE Axon 7
20408 Points ∼30% +28%
Honor 8
15531 Points ∼23% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
9495 Points ∼14% -41%
OnePlus 3
21771 Points ∼32% +36%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordenar por valor)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13466 Points ∼3%
ZTE Axon 7
24310 Points ∼5% +81%
Honor 8
22157 Points ∼5% +65%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
7542 Points ∼2% -44%
OnePlus 3
34023 Points ∼8% +153%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordenar por valor)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13955 Points ∼7%
ZTE Axon 7
23319 Points ∼12% +67%
Honor 8
20235 Points ∼10% +45%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
7903 Points ∼4% -43%
OnePlus 3
30241 Points ∼16% +117%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
23 fps ∼2%
ZTE Axon 7
88 fps ∼8% +283%
Honor 8
41 fps ∼4% +78%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
14 fps ∼1% -39%
OnePlus 3
89 fps ∼8% +287%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
21 fps ∼5%
ZTE Axon 7
53 fps ∼12% +152%
Honor 8
43 fps ∼9% +105%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
14 fps ∼3% -33%
OnePlus 3
60 fps ∼13% +186%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.9 fps ∼2%
ZTE Axon 7
39 fps ∼7% +294%
Honor 8
19 fps ∼3% +92%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
3.8 fps ∼1% -62%
OnePlus 3
47 fps ∼9% +375%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.7 fps ∼4%
ZTE Axon 7
28 fps ∼12% +189%
Honor 8
19 fps ∼8% +96%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
3.8 fps ∼2% -61%
OnePlus 3
46 fps ∼20% +374%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.2 fps ∼2%
ZTE Axon 7
31 fps ∼10% +400%
Honor 8
10 fps ∼3% +61%
OnePlus 3
31 fps ∼10% +400%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.1 fps ∼3%
ZTE Axon 7
16 fps ∼9% +162%
Honor 8
11 fps ∼6% +80%
OnePlus 3
30 fps ∼17% +392%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6785 Points ∼84%
ZTE Axon 7
4970 Points ∼61% -27%
Honor 8
6735 Points ∼83% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
4008 Points ∼49% -41%
OnePlus 3 (OxygenOS 3.1.2)
7101 Points ∼87% +5%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordenar por valor)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
702 Points ∼46%
ZTE Axon 7
963 Points ∼62% +37%
Honor 8
994 Points ∼64% +42%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
741 Points ∼48% +6%
OnePlus 3
1112 Points ∼72% +58%
Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1019 Points ∼12%
ZTE Axon 7
4631 Points ∼54% +354%
Honor 8
1703 Points ∼20% +67%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
488 Points ∼6% -52%
OnePlus 3
4813 Points ∼56% +372%
Memory (ordenar por valor)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1042 Points ∼27%
ZTE Axon 7
1489 Points ∼39% +43%
Honor 8
2556 Points ∼66% +145%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
554 Points ∼14% -47%
OnePlus 3
2052 Points ∼53% +97%
System (ordenar por valor)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2923 Points ∼44%
ZTE Axon 7
3307 Points ∼50% +13%
Honor 8
3952 Points ∼60% +35%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
2153 Points ∼33% -26%
OnePlus 3
3537 Points ∼54% +21%
Overall (ordenar por valor)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1215 Points ∼37%
ZTE Axon 7
2165 Points ∼66% +78%
Honor 8
2034 Points ∼62% +67%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
810 Points ∼25% -33%
OnePlus 3
2496 Points ∼76% +105%

Leyenda

 
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Axon 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
4905 Points ∼11%
OnePlus 3 (Chrome 51)
9155 Points ∼20% +87%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 (Chrome 38)
3611 Points ∼8% -26%
Honor 8 (Chrome 52)
10692 Points ∼24% +118%
ZTE Axon 7 (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
8062 Points ∼18% +64%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
8041.4 ms * ∼14%
OnePlus 3 (Chrome 51)
2920.7 ms * ∼5% +64%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 (Chrome 38)
11887 ms * ∼20% -48%
Honor 8 (Chrome 52)
2979 ms * ∼5% +63%
ZTE Axon 7 (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
3096.5 ms * ∼5% +61%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (ordenar por valor)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
84 Points ∼15%
OnePlus 3 (Chrome 51)
122 Points ∼21% +45%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 (Chrome 38)
64 Points ∼11% -24%
Honor 8 (Chrome 52)
138 Points ∼24% +64%
ZTE Axon 7 (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
111 Points ∼19% +32%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
31.118 Points ∼10%
OnePlus 3 (chrome 51)
54.4 Points ∼17% +75%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 (Chrome 38)
22 Points ∼7% -29%
Honor 8 (Chrome 52)
64.046 Points ∼20% +106%
ZTE Axon 7 (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
44.754 Points ∼14% +44%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
50.07 MB/s ∼77%
Honor 8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
23.59 MB/s ∼36% -53%
ZTE Axon 7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
51.34 MB/s ∼78% +3%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
79.22 MB/s ∼95%
Honor 8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
53.68 MB/s ∼64% -32%
ZTE Axon 7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
78.39 MB/s ∼94% -1%
Random Write 4KB (ordenar por valor)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
7.4 MB/s ∼10%
OnePlus 3
18.23 MB/s ∼24% +146%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
11.2 MB/s ∼15% +51%
Honor 8
31.5 MB/s ∼42% +326%
ZTE Axon 7
16.22 MB/s ∼22% +119%
Random Read 4KB (ordenar por valor)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
74 MB/s ∼54%
OnePlus 3
137.62 MB/s ∼100% +86%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
22.9 MB/s ∼17% -69%
Honor 8
34.16 MB/s ∼25% -54%
ZTE Axon 7
121.07 MB/s ∼88% +64%
Sequential Write 256KB (ordenar por valor)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
188 MB/s ∼100%
OnePlus 3
153.3 MB/s ∼82% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
60.4 MB/s ∼32% -68%
Honor 8
119.25 MB/s ∼63% -37%
ZTE Axon 7
150.92 MB/s ∼80% -20%
Sequential Read 256KB (ordenar por valor)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
282 MB/s ∼47%
OnePlus 3
408.71 MB/s ∼69% +45%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
209.4 MB/s ∼35% -26%
Honor 8
247.46 MB/s ∼42% -12%
ZTE Axon 7
406.49 MB/s ∼68% +44%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguracionesValor
 high29 fps
 very low29 fps
comparado con
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016 (min)
 3475 Quad, Mali-T720
12
   ...
Huawei Nova Plus
 625, Adreno 506
28
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP2
28
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
 625, Adreno 506
28
Google Nexus 5
 800 MSM8974, Adreno 330
28
LG G4
 808 MSM8992, Adreno 418
28.3
   ...
HTC 10 (max)
 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
48
Carga Máx.
 37.8 °C38.2 °C38.6 °C 
 37.3 °C36.8 °C37.9 °C 
 36 °C36.3 °C36.4 °C 
Máximo: 38.6 °C
Médio: 37.3 °C
34.6 °C36.2 °C39.1 °C
35.1 °C35.9 °C38 °C
34.5 °C34.9 °C36 °C
Máximo: 39.1 °C
Médio: 36 °C
Conector de corriente  33 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.640.52525.432.93125.334.14032.932.95033.635.96331.633.68028.430.7100272612520.826.81602229.520021.336.925020.846.931521.251.840019.456.950019.561.663017.76480017.969.3100017.869.5125017.372.9160017.471.1200016.770.6250017.268.9315018.273.8400017.976500017.669.4630017.771.6800017.873.51000017.971.11250018.170.41600018.268.2SPL3083.7N1.356.5median 17.9Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KLmedian 69.3Delta1.310.131.636.725.432.825.32932.935.233.649.731.632.328.429.32725.720.8282239.121.346.820.855.621.259.419.463.219.569.417.772.517.973.717.875.117.375.917.476.116.777.917.277.518.277.717.976.517.673.717.768.217.861.217.953.518.156.118.2513087.11.366.1median 17.9ZTE Axon 7median 68.21.311.731.632.825.430.425.332.132.933.333.63631.630.128.427.82725.420.825.62229.121.339.620.848.321.254.219.456.819.559.117.758.117.961.117.864.417.365.817.467.416.770.317.27118.277.117.979.117.673.517.772.117.87117.966.418.157.518.253.13084.71.353.4median 17.9Honor 8median 61.11.310.736.634.435.736.63032.332.43031.235.627.531.230.530.927.530.537.739.235.437.733.240.129.733.228.53029.228.526.32725.326.324.42724.124.430.926.42330.939.222.923.139.247.927.618.547.955.633.520.555.655.837.918.755.862.444.618.162.469.250.618.269.271.255.719.171.272.356.31772.371.156.617.371.172.753.317.472.775.95217.575.979.155.617.379.174.452.417.274.4714817.27171.348.217.271.382.458.717.682.478.555.317.778.573.849.817.873.866.543.11866.572.248.817.972.287.76629.987.768.919.11.368.9median 71.1Samsung Galaxy A5 2016median 48.8median 17.9median 71.19.710.31.59.740.136.832.440.1382731.33834.330.631.734.334.529.72634.544.138.139.444.140.529.736.240.53331.428.63326.827.625.426.826.924.421.326.93724.823.33745.529.522.545.551.636.222.451.657.341.721.357.359.746.618.459.766.452.517.566.468.45217.568.469.952.517.269.971.853.816.871.872.554.817.372.575.256.917.475.278.459.716.678.477.659.717.377.678.260.817.678.281.363.817.681.378.561.817.778.575.958.817.475.976.259.417.776.274.357.517.974.370.354.818.170.354.437.618.154.488.671.129.888.67325.81.373median 70.3OnePlus 3median 53.8median 17.7median 70.311.910.41.611.9hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 43%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

ZTE Axon 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.05 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 43%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Honor 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 43%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 43%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

OnePlus 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.61 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 43%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.06 / 0.24 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.83 / 2.11 / 2.12 Watt
Carga midlight 3.41 / 5.46 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
2900 mAh
Honor 8
3000 mAh
ZTE Axon 7
3250 mAh
Power Consumption
-12%
9%
-7%
-5%
Idle Minimum *
0.83
0.57
31%
0.96
-16%
0.78
6%
0.64
23%
Idle Average *
2.11
1.24
41%
1.64
22%
1.89
10%
0.84
60%
Idle Maximum *
2.12
1.36
36%
1.71
19%
2.02
5%
0.87
59%
Load Average *
3.41
5.92
-74%
2.98
13%
5.28
-55%
6.02
-77%
Load Maximum *
5.46
10.53
-93%
5.08
7%
5.44
-0%
10.45
-91%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
25h 02min
Navegando con WLAN v1.3
13h 17min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 05min
Carga (máximo brillo)
5h 52min
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
2900 mAh
Honor 8
3000 mAh
ZTE Axon 7
3250 mAh
Duración de Batería
-9%
11%
-27%
-21%
Reader / Idle
1502
1338
-11%
2323
55%
1487
-1%
1735
16%
Load
352
268
-24%
483
37%
255
-28%
245
-30%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
797
840
5%
626
-21%
499
-37%
411
-48%
H.264
905
847
-6%
672
-26%
526
-42%
704
-22%

Pro

+ construcción de gran calidad
+ lector de huellas
+ panel Full HD muy brillante
+ Android 6.0
+ USB Type-C
+ LTE y dual-SIM
+ gran aguante de bateria
+ cámara decente
+ Quick Charge 3.0

Contra

- mal rendimiento WiFi
- LTE no a plena velocidad
- montones de bloatware
- sin App2SD
- sin NFC
- teclas Android no iluminadas
Asus Zenfone 3. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Asus Alemania
Asus Zenfone 3. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Asus Alemania

Asus pone en la línea de salida un smartphone estilosísimo de 5.5" que también convence con sus valores internos. Con el procesador octa-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 y 4 GB de RAM, el ZenFone tiene montones de potencia que bastarán para todas las aplicaciones y juegos actuales. Lo que es más, tiene un panel FHD muy brillante y de estable ángulo de visión, y una cámara de 16MP que saca fotos satisfactorias. La buena configuración también incluye LTE, dual-SIM, puerto USB Type-C reversible que incluye tecnología Quick Charge, y un lector de huellas. El paquete lo remata Android 6.0.1 Marshmallow, que Asus cubre con la nueva versión de su interfaz ZenUI. El gran aguante de batería y el bajo desarrollo de temperatura durante su uso no deben quedar sin mención.

Asus ha creado una pieza de diseño con su ZenFone 3. El smartphone de gama media parece bastante más caro de lo que en realidad es.

No hay mucho que criticar. Las teclas Android bajo la pantalla no están iluminadas, y la transimsión de datos por Wi-Fi es más lenta que rápida. Asus también es demasiado generoso con la configuración software y preinstala innecesariamente muchas apps en el smartphone. En el test, no pudimos mover apps a nuestras micro-SD ya que no se pudieron formatear como almacenamiento interno.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL - 10/21/AM v5.1
Manuel Masiero

Acabado
91%
Teclado
72 / 75 → 96%
Ratón
89%
Conectividad
46 / 60 → 76%
Peso
92%
Battería
96%
Pantalla
85%
Rendimiento de juegos
32 / 63 → 51%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
52 / 70 → 74%
Temperatura
89%
Ruido
100%
Audio
73 / 91 → 80%
Cámara
72%
Médio
76%
86%
Smartphone - media ponderada

Pricecompare

> Español - Home > Análisis > Breve análisis del Smartphone Asus ZenFone 3 ZE552KL
Manuel Masiero, 2016-11- 2 (Update: 2016-11- 2)