Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del Smartphone Blackview A8 Max

Marcus Herbrich (traducido por Francisco García), 10/28/PM

Le falta contraste. Aunque bien equipado, el smartphone básico A8 Max de Blackview sólo cuesta 90 Euros - y eso incluye hasta los gastos de envío. El smartphone de bajo coste de los fabricantes chinos puntúa con buena relación precio-valor, pero el mediocre contraste de su panel IPS HD es una rémora.

bien (79%) Blackview A8 Max Mediatek MT6737ARM Mali-T720 v5.1 - 10/19/AM
Dispositivo de pruebas cortesía de Blackview
(download rating image as PNG or SVG)
Blackview A8 Max (A Serie)
Procesador
Mediatek MT6737 1.25 GHz
Adaptador gráfico
Memoría
2048 MB 
pantalla
5.5 pulgadas 16:9, 1280x720 pixels 267 PPI, capacitiva, LCD, IPS, lustroso: si
Disco duro
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 11.13 GB libre
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, Audio Conexiones: 3,5 Millimeter Klinkenanschluss, Card Reader: microSD (hasta 64 GB), Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Beschleunigungsensor, Annäherungsensor, App2SD
Equipamento de red
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, 2G: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz; 3G: WCDMA 900 / 2100 MHz; 4G: LTE 800 / 900 / 1800 / 2100 / 2600 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 8.9 x 154.3 x 78
Battería
3000 mAh Litio-Polimero, removeable, Duración de la Batería (según el fabricante): 336 h, Tiempo de Conversación 3G (según el fabricante): 14 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Características adicionales
Altavoces: Monolautsprecher, Teclado: virtual, Luz de Teclado: si, adaptador de corriente modular, cable USB, Blackview UI, 12 Meses Garantía, SAR n.b., fanless
Peso
177 g, Suministro de Electricidad: 28 g
Precio
90 Euros

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Blackview A8 Max
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
34.3 MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Blackview A8 Max
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
47.5 MBit/s ∼100%
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Xiaomi Mi 5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (5.0 GHz)
316 MBit/s ∼100%
Blackview R7
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
102 MBit/s ∼32%
Ulefone Metal
Mali-T720, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash (AVM Fritzbox 6490)
88.3 MBit/s ∼28%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
Mali-T720, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash (2.4 GHz)
48.7 MBit/s ∼15%
Oukitel U7 Plus
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash (2.4 GHz)
48.3 MBit/s ∼15%
Leagoo M5
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash (2.4 GHz)
47.5 MBit/s ∼15%
TP-Link Neffos C5
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash (2.4 GHz)
44.9 MBit/s ∼14%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Xiaomi Mi 5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (5.0 GHz)
265 MBit/s ∼100%
Blackview R7
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
79.4 MBit/s ∼30%
Ulefone Metal
Mali-T720, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash (AVM Fritzbox 6490)
73.1 MBit/s ∼28%
Oukitel U7 Plus
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash (2.4 GHz)
52.1 MBit/s ∼20%
Leagoo M5
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash (2.4 GHz)
51 MBit/s ∼19%
TP-Link Neffos C5
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash (2.4 GHz)
49.3 MBit/s ∼19%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
Mali-T720, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash (2.4 GHz)
48.5 MBit/s ∼18%
GPS Blackview A8 Max
GPS Blackview A8 Max
GPS Blackview A8 Max
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500

Comparación de Imágenes

Elige una escena y navega dentro de la primera imagen. Un click cambia el nivel de zoom. Un click en la imagen aumentada abre la original en una ventana nueva. La primera imagen muestra la fotografía escalada del dispositivo de pruebas.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
376
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
396
cd/m²
394
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
389
cd/m²
399
cd/m²
436
cd/m²
402
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 436 cd/m² Médio: 406.9 cd/m² Minimum: 17.2 cd/m²
iluminación: 86 %
Brillo con batería: 435 cd/m²
Contraste: 403:1 (Negro: 1.08 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.7 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 5.9 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.18
Blackview A8 Max
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Ulefone Metal
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Oukitel U7 Plus
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Leagoo M5
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
IPS, 1280x720, 5
TP-Link Neffos C5
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Blackview R7
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Xiaomi Mi 5
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.15
Screen
4%
14%
-9%
10%
27%
-8%
61%
Brightness
407
315
-23%
437
7%
387
-5%
349
-14%
491
21%
526
29%
566
39%
Brightness Distribution
86
87
1%
91
6%
92
7%
89
3%
89
3%
91
6%
90
5%
Black Level *
1.08
0.56
48%
0.58
46%
0.53
51%
0.65
40%
0.58
46%
0.64
41%
0.51
53%
Contrast
403
557
38%
797
98%
757
88%
529
31%
876
117%
863
114%
1173
191%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.7
6.8
-19%
7.5
-32%
9.7
-70%
5.8
-2%
7
-23%
11
-93%
3.5
39%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.9
7.1
-20%
8.5
-44%
13.3
-125%
5.7
3%
6.1
-3%
14.3
-142%
3.5
41%
Gamma
2.18 110%
2.77 87%
2.54 94%
2.3 104%
2.1 114%
2.15 112%
2.21 109%
2.29 105%
CCT
8164 80%
7402 88%
8914 73%
10359 63%
7792 83%
8068 81%
12996 50%
6532 100%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
25 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 11 ms subida
↘ 14 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 35 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (27.3 ms).
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
49 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 13 ms subida
↘ 36 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 77 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (44.3 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 60 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 875 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 30860) Hz.

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
18.5 MB/s ∼21%
Ulefone Metal
27.6 MB/s ∼32% +49%
Oukitel U7 Plus (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
22.6 MB/s ∼26% +22%
Leagoo M5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
18.48 MB/s ∼21% 0%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
15.58 MB/s ∼18% -16%
TP-Link Neffos C5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
18.89 MB/s ∼22% +2%
Blackview R7
11.87 MB/s ∼14% -36%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
35.94 MB/s ∼37%
Ulefone Metal
49.6 MB/s ∼51% +38%
Oukitel U7 Plus (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
46.63 MB/s ∼48% +30%
Leagoo M5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
36.07 MB/s ∼37% 0%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
31.85 MB/s ∼33% -11%
TP-Link Neffos C5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
39.11 MB/s ∼41% +9%
Blackview R7
15.56 MB/s ∼16% -57%
Random Write 4KB (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max
5.65 MB/s ∼4%
Ulefone Metal
7.87 MB/s ∼5% +39%
Oukitel U7 Plus
2.18 MB/s ∼1% -61%
Leagoo M5
5.46 MB/s ∼4% -3%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
4.35 MB/s ∼3% -23%
TP-Link Neffos C5
6.85 MB/s ∼4% +21%
Blackview R7
11.4 MB/s ∼7% +102%
Xiaomi Mi 5
13.61 MB/s ∼9% +141%
Random Read 4KB (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max
16.15 MB/s ∼10%
Ulefone Metal
22.18 MB/s ∼13% +37%
Oukitel U7 Plus
11.25 MB/s ∼7% -30%
Leagoo M5
14.98 MB/s ∼9% -7%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
14.31 MB/s ∼8% -11%
TP-Link Neffos C5
17.16 MB/s ∼10% +6%
Blackview R7
28.02 MB/s ∼17% +73%
Xiaomi Mi 5
106.78 MB/s ∼63% +561%
Sequential Write 256KB (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max
47.25 MB/s ∼25%
Ulefone Metal
39.91 MB/s ∼21% -16%
Oukitel U7 Plus
59 MB/s ∼31% +25%
Leagoo M5
12.11 MB/s ∼6% -74%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
7.56 MB/s ∼4% -84%
TP-Link Neffos C5
52.43 MB/s ∼28% +11%
Blackview R7
122.67 MB/s ∼65% +160%
Xiaomi Mi 5
159.29 MB/s ∼84% +237%
Sequential Read 256KB (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max
141.83 MB/s ∼19%
Ulefone Metal
228.84 MB/s ∼31% +61%
Oukitel U7 Plus
125.91 MB/s ∼17% -11%
Leagoo M5
133.68 MB/s ∼18% -6%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
125.37 MB/s ∼17% -12%
TP-Link Neffos C5
145.77 MB/s ∼20% +3%
Blackview R7
247.58 MB/s ∼34% +75%
Xiaomi Mi 5
459.64 MB/s ∼62% +224%
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max
30916 Points ∼17%
Ulefone Metal
37103 Points ∼20% +20%
Oukitel U7 Plus
28683 Points ∼16% -7%
Leagoo M5
24238 Points ∼13% -22%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
23657 Points ∼13% -23%
TP-Link Neffos C5
32681 Points ∼18% +6%
Blackview R7
50572 Points ∼27% +64%
Xiaomi Mi 5
116330 Points ∼63% +276%
3DMark
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max
727 Points ∼28%
Ulefone Metal
1057 Points ∼41% +45%
Oukitel U7 Plus
749 Points ∼29% +3%
TP-Link Neffos C5
810 Points ∼31% +11%
Blackview R7
1155 Points ∼45% +59%
Xiaomi Mi 5
1976 Points ∼76% +172%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max
129 Points ∼2%
Ulefone Metal
243 Points ∼3% +88%
Oukitel U7 Plus
126 Points ∼2% -2%
TP-Link Neffos C5
167 Points ∼2% +29%
Blackview R7
518 Points ∼7% +302%
Xiaomi Mi 5
4558 Points ∼59% +3433%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max
158 Points ∼3%
Ulefone Metal
293 Points ∼6% +85%
Oukitel U7 Plus
155 Points ∼3% -2%
TP-Link Neffos C5
203 Points ∼4% +28%
Blackview R7
590 Points ∼12% +273%
Xiaomi Mi 5
3542 Points ∼73% +2142%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max
8646 Points ∼13%
Ulefone Metal
10371 Points ∼15% +20%
Oukitel U7 Plus
8660 Points ∼13% 0%
Leagoo M5
7886 Points ∼11% -9%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
6902 Points ∼10% -20%
TP-Link Neffos C5
9291 Points ∼13% +7%
Blackview R7
12585 Points ∼18% +46%
Xiaomi Mi 5
21483 Points ∼31% +148%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max
3284 Points ∼1%
Ulefone Metal
6469 Points ∼1% +97%
Oukitel U7 Plus
3137 Points ∼1% -4%
Leagoo M5
2478 Points ∼1% -25%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2681 Points ∼1% -18%
TP-Link Neffos C5
4223 Points ∼1% +29%
Blackview R7
10334 Points ∼2% +215%
Xiaomi Mi 5
32613 Points ∼7% +893%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max
3809 Points ∼2%
Ulefone Metal
7059 Points ∼4% +85%
Oukitel U7 Plus
3656 Points ∼2% -4%
Leagoo M5
2921 Points ∼1% -23%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
3103 Points ∼2% -19%
TP-Link Neffos C5
4906 Points ∼2% +29%
Blackview R7
10762 Points ∼5% +183%
Xiaomi Mi 5
29246 Points ∼15% +668%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max
6 fps ∼0%
Ulefone Metal
19 fps ∼1% +217%
Oukitel U7 Plus
5.9 fps ∼0% -2%
Leagoo M5
4.4 fps ∼0% -27%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
8.7 fps ∼1% +45%
TP-Link Neffos C5
14 fps ∼1% +133%
Blackview R7
17 fps ∼1% +183%
Xiaomi Mi 5
90 fps ∼7% +1400%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max
10 fps ∼2%
Ulefone Metal
12 fps ∼3% +20%
Oukitel U7 Plus
9.8 fps ∼2% -2%
Leagoo M5
8 fps ∼2% -20%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
4.9 fps ∼1% -51%
TP-Link Neffos C5
8.3 fps ∼2% -17%
Blackview R7
17 fps ∼4% +70%
Xiaomi Mi 5
60 fps ∼13% +500%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max
2.2 fps ∼0%
Ulefone Metal
2.9 fps ∼1% +32%
Oukitel U7 Plus
4.4 fps ∼1% +100%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
3.6 fps ∼1% +64%
TP-Link Neffos C5
6.1 fps ∼1% +177%
Blackview R7
4.7 fps ∼1% +114%
Xiaomi Mi 5
42 fps ∼8% +1809%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max
4.5 fps ∼2%
Ulefone Metal
6.4 fps ∼3% +42%
Oukitel U7 Plus
2.1 fps ∼1% -53%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
1.2 fps ∼1% -73%
TP-Link Neffos C5
2.8 fps ∼1% -38%
Blackview R7
4.7 fps ∼2% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 5
42 fps ∼18% +833%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max
1.4 fps ∼0%
Ulefone Metal
8.9 fps ∼2% +536%
Oukitel U7 Plus
1.4 fps ∼0% 0%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2.7 fps ∼1% +93%
Blackview R7
2.5 fps ∼1% +79%
Xiaomi Mi 5
30 fps ∼7% +2043%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max
3.2 fps ∼2%
Ulefone Metal
4.5 fps ∼3% +41%
Oukitel U7 Plus
3.2 fps ∼2% 0%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
1.2 fps ∼1% -62%
Blackview R7
2.5 fps ∼1% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 5
31 fps ∼18% +869%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max
3427 Points ∼42%
Ulefone Metal
4079 Points ∼50% +19%
Oukitel U7 Plus
3105 Points ∼38% -9%
Leagoo M5
2808 Points ∼35% -18%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2807 Points ∼35% -18%
TP-Link Neffos C5
3443 Points ∼42% 0%
Blackview R7
4364 Points ∼54% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 5
6873 Points ∼85% +101%
Geekbench 4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max
1525 Points ∼6%
Ulefone Metal
2458 Points ∼9% +61%
Oukitel U7 Plus
1508 Points ∼6% -1%
Leagoo M5
1166 Points ∼4% -24%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
1206 Points ∼5% -21%
Blackview R7
2851 Points ∼11% +87%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max
589 Points ∼11%
Ulefone Metal
609 Points ∼11% +3%
Oukitel U7 Plus
580 Points ∼11% -2%
Leagoo M5
407 Points ∼7% -31%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
428 Points ∼8% -27%
Blackview R7
728 Points ∼13% +24%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max
9 Points ∼1%
Ulefone Metal
10 Points ∼1% +11%
Oukitel U7 Plus
573 Points ∼37% +6267%
Leagoo M5
9 Points ∼1% 0%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
9 Points ∼1% 0%
TP-Link Neffos C5
638 Points ∼41% +6989%
Blackview R7
10 Points ∼1% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 5
1106 Points ∼72% +12189%
Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max
211 Points ∼2%
Ulefone Metal
433 Points ∼5% +105%
Oukitel U7 Plus
211 Points ∼2% 0%
Leagoo M5
139 Points ∼2% -34%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
175 Points ∼2% -17%
TP-Link Neffos C5
281 Points ∼3% +33%
Blackview R7
655 Points ∼8% +210%
Xiaomi Mi 5
4522 Points ∼53% +2043%
Memory (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max
733 Points ∼19%
Ulefone Metal
802 Points ∼21% +9%
Oukitel U7 Plus
770 Points ∼20% +5%
Leagoo M5
331 Points ∼9% -55%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
354 Points ∼9% -52%
TP-Link Neffos C5
991 Points ∼26% +35%
Blackview R7
1030 Points ∼27% +41%
Xiaomi Mi 5
1801 Points ∼47% +146%
System (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max
1125 Points ∼17%
Ulefone Metal
1691 Points ∼26% +50%
Oukitel U7 Plus
1120 Points ∼17% 0%
Leagoo M5
990 Points ∼15% -12%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
838 Points ∼13% -26%
TP-Link Neffos C5
1199 Points ∼18% +7%
Blackview R7
1971 Points ∼30% +75%
Xiaomi Mi 5
3638 Points ∼55% +223%
Overall (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max
201 Points ∼6%
Ulefone Metal
273 Points ∼8% +36%
Oukitel U7 Plus
568 Points ∼17% +183%
Leagoo M5
144 Points ∼4% -28%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
148 Points ∼5% -26%
TP-Link Neffos C5
683 Points ∼21% +240%
Blackview R7
338 Points ∼10% +68%
Xiaomi Mi 5
2392 Points ∼73% +1090%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max (Chrome Version 53)
13642.6 ms * ∼23%
Ulefone Metal (Chrome Version 52)
13397.3 ms * ∼23% +2%
Oukitel U7 Plus (Chrome Version 53)
14931.4 ms * ∼25% -9%
Leagoo M5 (Chrome Version 53)
14766.5 ms * ∼25% -8%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G (Chrome Browser Version 52)
19092.2 ms * ∼32% -40%
TP-Link Neffos C5 (Chrome Version 51)
12783.4 ms * ∼21% +6%
Blackview R7 (Chrome Version 52)
9748.3 ms * ∼16% +29%
Xiaomi Mi 5 (Chrome Version 51)
2973.3 ms * ∼5% +78%
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max (Chrome Version 53)
2607 Points ∼5%
Ulefone Metal (Chrome Version 52)
2738 Points ∼6% +5%
Oukitel U7 Plus (Chrome Version 53)
2554 Points ∼5% -2%
Leagoo M5 (Chrome Version 53)
2144 Points ∼4% -18%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G (Chrome Browser Version 52)
2122 Points ∼4% -19%
TP-Link Neffos C5 (Chrome Version 51)
2738 Points ∼6% +5%
Blackview R7 (Chrome Version 52)
3885 Points ∼8% +49%
Xiaomi Mi 5 (Chrome Version 51)
8619 Points ∼17% +231%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max (Chrome Version 53)
17.188 Points ∼5%
Ulefone Metal (Chrome Version 52)
17.831 Points ∼6% +4%
Oukitel U7 Plus (Chrome Version 53)
17.257 Points ∼5% 0%
Leagoo M5 (Chrome Version 53)
14.451 Points ∼5% -16%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G (Chrome Browser Version 52)
12.755 Points ∼4% -26%
TP-Link Neffos C5 (Chrome Version 51)
18.209 Points ∼6% +6%
Blackview R7 (Chrome Version 52)
25.349 Points ∼8% +47%
Xiaomi Mi 5 (Chrome Version 51)
53.969 Points ∼17% +214%

Leyenda

 
Blackview A8 Max Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Ulefone Metal Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Oukitel U7 Plus Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Leagoo M5 Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Archos 50 Platinum 4G Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
TP-Link Neffos C5 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Blackview R7 Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.
 38 °C37.6 °C40.6 °C 
 39.3 °C38.4 °C40.4 °C 
 38.2 °C38.4 °C38.4 °C 
Máximo: 40.6 °C
Médio: 38.8 °C
34 °C34.4 °C38.7 °C
33.9 °C34.5 °C40 °C
33.9 °C35 °C40.8 °C
Máximo: 40.8 °C
Médio: 36.1 °C
Conector de corriente  35.5 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.632.62525.431.33125.336.64032.934.45033.638.16331.634.88028.428.81002727.412520.823.91602222.920021.326.825020.832.631521.242.640019.447.850019.555.863017.76180017.969.2100017.875.5125017.382.1160017.478.8200016.778.2250017.276.6315018.276.9400017.976.5500017.674.4630017.774.5800017.880.31000017.976.81250018.163.31600018.248.8SPL3089.1N1.372.4median 17.9Blackview A8 Maxmedian 69.2Delta1.316.820.622.921.920.620.721.720.320.722.32123.622.322.626.934.422.621.222.321.921.217.820.318.917.817.918.118.617.922.522.823.922.534.733.236.134.716.72617.216.716.433.215.816.419.438.919.119.422.345.519.122.327.552.717.927.533.658.319.133.639.163.216.139.143.466.515.543.442.764.716.442.739.26213.739.236.8601336.834.857.913.934.834.558.911.434.537.861.110.737.839.16310.339.141.464.29.841.442.7689.442.748.271.69.548.240.764.99.440.730.755.79.630.726.850.39.426.852.876.426.652.88.337.30.98.3median 34.8Ulefone Metalmedian 58.9median 13.9median 34.86.79.24.16.731.641.525.435.725.336.532.936.433.636.831.637.128.428272820.826.9222321.324.320.830.421.236.519.445.419.551.917.75517.959.717.863.517.364.217.466.816.766.717.263.718.268.617.975.117.676.617.767.417.865.817.965.718.157.218.245.53081.61.343.6median 17.9Oukitel U7 Plusmedian 59.71.313.724.323.124.324.322.32122.722.322.720.322.622.723.723.229.623.721.221.922.221.219.119.32019.117.617.118.517.620.120.12120.130.630.931.930.616.71616.516.718.218.317.318.217.817.618.317.81719.517.31719.529.216.419.527.13917.827.130.643.414.830.63850.915.73842.35616.442.345.66015.845.647.861.713.647.850.963.114.850.950.26312.650.252.264.711.252.252.86510.952.853.4669.753.452.4659.652.448.6619.748.64153.69.44134.147.69.434.129.743.79.429.761.774.426.161.712.828.50.812.8median 38Blackview R7median 50.9median 14.8median 3814.216.82.814.2hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Blackview A8 Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.06 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 10.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Ulefone Metal audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Oukitel U7 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.59 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 93% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Blackview R7 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.8% lower than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (42.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 97% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.08 / 0.18 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.74 / 1.97 / 2.09 Watt
Carga midlight 4.89 / 5.09 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Blackview A8 Max
3000 mAh
Ulefone Metal
3050 mAh
Oukitel U7 Plus
2500 mAh
Leagoo M5
2300 mAh
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2200 mAh
TP-Link Neffos C5
2200 mAh
Blackview R7
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
-39%
-24%
-24%
16%
-7%
-74%
Idle Minimum *
0.74
1.41
-91%
0.86
-16%
0.81
-9%
0.59
20%
0.72
3%
1.83
-147%
Idle Average *
1.97
2.46
-25%
2.68
-36%
2.26
-15%
1.68
15%
1.87
5%
3.21
-63%
Idle Maximum *
2.09
2.83
-35%
2.78
-33%
2.39
-14%
1.79
14%
2
4%
3.45
-65%
Load Average *
4.89
5.15
-5%
5.33
-9%
6.97
-43%
4.22
14%
5.99
-22%
5.67
-16%
Load Maximum *
5.09
7.05
-39%
6.49
-28%
7.03
-38%
4.26
16%
6.45
-27%
9.16
-80%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Navegando con WLAN v1.3
8h 26min
Blackview A8 Max
3000 mAh
Ulefone Metal
3050 mAh
Oukitel U7 Plus
2500 mAh
Leagoo M5
2300 mAh
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2200 mAh
TP-Link Neffos C5
2200 mAh
Blackview R7
3000 mAh
Duración de Batería
-20%
-28%
-20%
-24%
-10%
-19%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
506
403
-20%
366
-28%
406
-20%
384
-24%
453
-10%
412
-19%

Pro

+ panel IPS HD
+ decente rendimiento (para un smartphone básico)
+ 16 GB de almacenamiento flash
+ 2 GB de RAM
+ calidad de la carcasa
+ LTE (incluye banda 20)
+ buen aguante de batería

Contra

- bajo contraste
- almacenamiento eMMC lento
- SoC no muy potente
- baja velocidad de transferencias WLAN
- caída de conexión ocasional
- teclas no iluminadas
Blackview A8 Max. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Blackview.
Blackview A8 Max. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Blackview.

El Blackview A8 Max es un smartphone básico interesante. Por sólo 90 Euros, el A8 Max tiene una carcasa - para su precio - bastante decente y un buen rendimiento de sistema. La gestión de la temperatura es eficiente y el consumo de energía mdoerado, lo que tiene un efecto positivo en el aguante.

Además, el smartphone trae un display IPS razonablemente brillante, que ofrece una buena estabilidad de ángulo de visión y colores decentes.

Al mismo tiempo, el contraste del display es malo, el almacenamiento flash interno es lento y al módulo WLAN no sólo le falta rendimiento, sino que tampoco es 100% estable. 

Los smartphones básicos precisan compromisos - y el Blackview A8 Max no es diferente en ese aspecto. Visto el precio, el A8 Max no obstante es una compra decente.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Blackview A8 Max - 10/19/AM v5.1
Marcus Herbrich

Acabado
85%
Teclado
61 / 75 → 82%
Ratón
89%
Conectividad
37 / 60 → 62%
Peso
90%
Battería
91%
Pantalla
79%
Rendimiento de juegos
7 / 63 → 12%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
30 / 70 → 42%
Temperatura
87%
Ruido
100%
Audio
51 / 91 → 56%
Cámara
63%
Médio
67%
79%
Smartphone - media ponderada

Pricecompare

> Español - página inicial > Análisis > Breve análisis del Smartphone Blackview A8 Max
Marcus Herbrich, 2016-10-28 (Update: 2016-10-28)