Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del Smartphone Blackview R7

Marcus Herbrich (traducido por Francisco García), 09/13/PM

¿Smartphone insignia de bajo presupuesto? ¿Smartphone insignia de bajo presupuesto? El R7 es el primer smartphone autoproclamado insignia de los fabricantes chinos Blackview – por un precio local de unos 160 Euros. Commprobaremos cómo lo hace el nuevo insignia en nuestro análisis exhaustivo.

bien (80%) Blackview R7 Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755ARM Mali-T860 MP2 v5.1 - 09/05/AM
Dispositivo de pruebas cortesía de Blackview
(download rating image as PNG or SVG)
Blackview R7
Procesador
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 2 GHz
Adaptador gráfico
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Memoría
4096 MB 
pantalla
5.5 pulgadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixels 401 PPI, capacitiva, LCD, IPS, lustroso: si
Disco duro
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 25.43 GB libre
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, Audio Conexiones: clavija headset 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD (hasta 128 GB), 1 Lector de Huellas Digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: proximidad, acelerómetro, OTG, Miracast
Equipamento de red
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0, 2G: 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz, 3G: 900 / 2100 MHz, 4G: LTE 800 / 900 / 1800 / 2100 / 2600 4G: 1900/ 2300/ 2600 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 8.9 x 152 x 78
Battería
3000 mAh Litio-Polimero, Duración de la Batería (según el fabricante): 334 h, Tiempo de Conversación 3G (según el fabricante): 14 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Características adicionales
Altavoces: Mono, Teclado: virtual, Luz de Teclado: si, adaptador modular de corriente, cable USB, protector de pantalla, carcasa protectora, Blackview UI, 12 Meses Garantía, fanless
Peso
197 g, Suministro de Electricidad: 93 g
Precio
160 Euros

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Xiaomi Mi 5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (5.0 GHz)
316 MBit/s ∼100% +210%
Blackview R7
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
102 MBit/s ∼32%
Honor 5C
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.8 MBit/s ∼16% -51%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Xiaomi Mi 5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (5.0 GHz)
265 MBit/s ∼100% +234%
Blackview R7
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
79.4 MBit/s ∼30%
Honor 5C
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
58.3 MBit/s ∼22% -27%
GPS Test Blackview R7
GPS Test Blackview R7
GPS Test Blackview R7
GPS Test Garmin Edge 500
GPS Test Garmin Edge 500
GPS Test Garmin Edge 500

Comparación de Imágenes

Elige una escena y navega dentro de la primera imagen. Un click cambia el nivel de zoom. Un click en la imagen aumentada abre la original en una ventana nueva. La primera imagen muestra la fotografía escalada del dispositivo de pruebas.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
506
cd/m²
554
cd/m²
529
cd/m²
503
cd/m²
552
cd/m²
517
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
541
cd/m²
531
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 554 cd/m² Médio: 526.3 cd/m² Minimum: 28.36 cd/m²
iluminación: 91 %
Brillo con batería: 552 cd/m²
Contraste: 863:1 (Negro: 0.64 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 11 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 14.3 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.21
Blackview R7
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Coolpad Torino S
IPS, 1280x720, 4.7
LG K10
IPS, 1280x720, 5.3
Honor 5C
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Xiaomi Mi 5
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.15
Screen
37%
14%
27%
22%
35%
Brightness
526
302
-43%
358
-32%
355
-33%
498
-5%
566
8%
Brightness Distribution
91
79
-13%
87
-4%
92
1%
93
2%
90
-1%
Black Level *
0.64
0.15
77%
0.45
30%
0.28
56%
0.49
23%
0.51
20%
Contrast
863
2080
141%
800
-7%
1321
53%
1051
22%
1173
36%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
11
8.2
25%
6.8
38%
6.7
39%
6.2
44%
3.5
68%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
14.3
9.2
36%
6.2
57%
7.9
45%
7.4
48%
3.5
76%
Gamma
2.21 109%
2.29 105%
2.14 112%
2.21 109%
2.28 105%
2.29 105%
CCT
12996 50%
9017 72%
7975 82%
9072 72%
8664 75%
6532 100%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
28 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 10 ms subida
↘ 18 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 57 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (27.3 ms).
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
32 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 10 ms subida
↘ 22 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 17 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (44.3 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 60 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 875 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 30860) Hz.

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
Blackview R7
11.87 MB/s ∼14%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
12.62 MB/s ∼14% +6%
Coolpad Torino S (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
16.54 MB/s ∼19% +39%
LG K10 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
45 MB/s ∼52% +279%
Honor 5C (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
24.21 MB/s ∼28% +104%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
Blackview R7
15.56 MB/s ∼16%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
22.77 MB/s ∼24% +46%
Coolpad Torino S (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
25.79 MB/s ∼27% +66%
LG K10 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
75.47 MB/s ∼78% +385%
Honor 5C (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
51.93 MB/s ∼54% +234%
Random Write 4KB (ordenar por valor)
Blackview R7
11.4 MB/s ∼7%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
8.26 MB/s ∼5% -28%
Coolpad Torino S
6.94 MB/s ∼5% -39%
LG K10
7.5 MB/s ∼5% -34%
Honor 5C
15.7 MB/s ∼10% +38%
Xiaomi Mi 5
13.61 MB/s ∼9% +19%
Random Read 4KB (ordenar por valor)
Blackview R7
28.02 MB/s ∼17%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
18.24 MB/s ∼11% -35%
Coolpad Torino S
18.34 MB/s ∼11% -35%
LG K10
9.2 MB/s ∼5% -67%
Honor 5C
61.7 MB/s ∼37% +120%
Xiaomi Mi 5
106.78 MB/s ∼63% +281%
Sequential Write 256KB (ordenar por valor)
Blackview R7
122.67 MB/s ∼65%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
70.33 MB/s ∼37% -43%
Coolpad Torino S
41.81 MB/s ∼22% -66%
LG K10
78 MB/s ∼41% -36%
Honor 5C
75.5 MB/s ∼40% -38%
Xiaomi Mi 5
159.29 MB/s ∼84% +30%
Sequential Read 256KB (ordenar por valor)
Blackview R7
247.58 MB/s ∼34%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
187.34 MB/s ∼25% -24%
Coolpad Torino S
140.34 MB/s ∼19% -43%
LG K10
131 MB/s ∼18% -47%
Honor 5C
263 MB/s ∼36% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 5
459.64 MB/s ∼62% +86%
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Blackview R7
50572 Points ∼27%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
23822 Points ∼13% -53%
Coolpad Torino S
22766 Points ∼12% -55%
LG K10
27383 Points ∼15% -46%
Honor 5C
53143 Points ∼29% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 5
116330 Points ∼63% +130%
3DMark
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordenar por valor)
Blackview R7
1155 Points ∼45%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
618 Points ∼24% -46%
Coolpad Torino S
735 Points ∼28% -36%
LG K10
730 Points ∼28% -37%
Honor 5C
1418 Points ∼55% +23%
Xiaomi Mi 5
1976 Points ∼76% +71%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Blackview R7
518 Points ∼7%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
101 Points ∼1% -81%
Coolpad Torino S
41 Points ∼1% -92%
LG K10
41 Points ∼1% -92%
Honor 5C
480 Points ∼6% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 5
4558 Points ∼59% +780%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordenar por valor)
Blackview R7
590 Points ∼12%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
124 Points ∼3% -79%
Coolpad Torino S
52 Points ∼1% -91%
LG K10
52 Points ∼1% -91%
Honor 5C
563 Points ∼12% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 5
3542 Points ∼73% +500%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordenar por valor)
Blackview R7
12585 Points ∼18%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
7026 Points ∼10% -44%
Coolpad Torino S
9205 Points ∼13% -27%
LG K10
9106 Points ∼13% -28%
Honor 5C
13588 Points ∼20% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 5
21483 Points ∼31% +71%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordenar por valor)
Blackview R7
10334 Points ∼2%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2645 Points ∼1% -74%
Coolpad Torino S
3858 Points ∼1% -63%
LG K10
3774 Points ∼1% -63%
Honor 5C
11319 Points ∼2% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 5
32613 Points ∼7% +216%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordenar por valor)
Blackview R7
10762 Points ∼5%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
3070 Points ∼2% -71%
Coolpad Torino S
4430 Points ∼2% -59%
LG K10
4339 Points ∼2% -60%
Honor 5C
11755 Points ∼6% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 5
29246 Points ∼15% +172%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Blackview R7
17 fps ∼1%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
4.9 fps ∼0% -71%
Coolpad Torino S
9.8 fps ∼1% -42%
LG K10
5.2 fps ∼0% -69%
Honor 5C
19 fps ∼1% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 5
90 fps ∼7% +429%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Blackview R7
17 fps ∼4%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
8.2 fps ∼2% -52%
Coolpad Torino S
5.3 fps ∼1% -69%
LG K10
9.7 fps ∼2% -43%
Honor 5C
20 fps ∼4% +18%
Xiaomi Mi 5
60 fps ∼13% +253%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Blackview R7
4.7 fps ∼1%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
3.4 fps ∼1% -28%
Coolpad Torino S
4.3 fps ∼1% -9%
LG K10
1.8 fps ∼0% -62%
Honor 5C
7.9 fps ∼1% +68%
Xiaomi Mi 5
42 fps ∼8% +794%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Blackview R7
4.7 fps ∼2%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1.8 fps ∼1% -62%
Coolpad Torino S
1.8 fps ∼1% -62%
LG K10
4.1 fps ∼2% -13%
Honor 5C
8.4 fps ∼4% +79%
Xiaomi Mi 5
42 fps ∼18% +794%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
Blackview R7
2.5 fps ∼1%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2.5 fps ∼1% 0%
LG K10
fps ∼0% -100%
Honor 5C
4.5 fps ∼1% +80%
Xiaomi Mi 5
30 fps ∼7% +1100%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
Blackview R7
2.5 fps ∼1%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1.2 fps ∼1% -52%
LG K10
fps ∼0% -100%
Honor 5C
4.9 fps ∼3% +96%
Xiaomi Mi 5
31 fps ∼18% +1140%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor)
Blackview R7
4364 Points ∼54%
Coolpad Torino S
3932 Points ∼48% -10%
LG K10
3999 Points ∼49% -8%
Honor 5C
5120 Points ∼63% +17%
Xiaomi Mi 5
6873 Points ∼85% +57%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordenar por valor)
Blackview R7
10 Points ∼1%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
592 Points ∼38% +5820%
Coolpad Torino S
599 Points ∼39% +5890%
LG K10
562 Points ∼36% +5520%
Honor 5C
707 Points ∼46% +6970%
Xiaomi Mi 5
1106 Points ∼72% +10960%
Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Blackview R7
655 Points ∼8%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
174 Points ∼2% -73%
Coolpad Torino S
321 Points ∼4% -51%
LG K10
310 Points ∼4% -53%
Honor 5C
814 Points ∼9% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 5
4522 Points ∼53% +590%
Memory (ordenar por valor)
Blackview R7
1030 Points ∼27%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
487 Points ∼13% -53%
Coolpad Torino S
607 Points ∼16% -41%
LG K10
453 Points ∼12% -56%
Honor 5C
1504 Points ∼39% +46%
Xiaomi Mi 5
1801 Points ∼47% +75%
System (ordenar por valor)
Blackview R7
1971 Points ∼30%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
801 Points ∼12% -59%
Coolpad Torino S
1102 Points ∼17% -44%
LG K10
1050 Points ∼16% -47%
Honor 5C
2600 Points ∼40% +32%
Xiaomi Mi 5
3638 Points ∼55% +85%
Overall (ordenar por valor)
Blackview R7
338 Points ∼10%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
448 Points ∼14% +33%
Coolpad Torino S
602 Points ∼18% +78%
LG K10
536 Points ∼16% +59%
Honor 5C
1225 Points ∼37% +262%
Xiaomi Mi 5
2392 Points ∼73% +608%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Blackview R7 (Chrome Version 52)
25.349 Points ∼8%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite (Chrome Version 50)
12.729 Points ∼4% -50%
Coolpad Torino S (Chrome Version 50)
14.453 Points ∼5% -43%
LG K10 (Chrome 50)
17.478 Points ∼5% -31%
Honor 5C (Chrome 51)
27.934 Points ∼9% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 5 (Chrome Version 51)
53.969 Points ∼17% +113%
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Blackview R7 (Chrome Version 52)
3885 Points ∼8%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite (Chrome Version 50)
1910 Points ∼4% -51%
Coolpad Torino S (Chrome Version 50)
2364 Points ∼5% -39%
LG K10 (Chrome 50)
2838 Points ∼6% -27%
Honor 5C (Chrome 51)
4188 Points ∼8% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 5 (Chrome Version 51)
8619 Points ∼17% +122%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Blackview R7 (Chrome Version 52)
9748.3 ms * ∼16%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite (Chrome Version 50)
19234.4 ms * ∼32% -97%
Coolpad Torino S (Chrome Version 50)
15784.4 ms * ∼27% -62%
LG K10 (Chrome 50)
16638 ms * ∼28% -71%
Honor 5C (Chrome 51)
9111.2 ms * ∼15% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 5 (Chrome Version 51)
2973.3 ms * ∼5% +69%

Leyenda

 
Blackview R7 Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V7 Lite Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Coolpad Torino S Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG K10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 5C HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.
 38.4 °C34.4 °C33.4 °C 
 39 °C35.2 °C35.1 °C 
 37.8 °C34.8 °C33.7 °C 
Máximo: 39 °C
Médio: 35.8 °C
32.2 °C34.2 °C40.1 °C
32.5 °C33.8 °C41.8 °C
32.6 °C34 °C39.5 °C
Máximo: 41.8 °C
Médio: 35.6 °C
Conector de corriente  33.5 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2024.323.124.324.32522.32122.722.33122.720.322.622.74023.723.229.623.75021.221.922.221.26319.119.32019.18017.617.118.517.610020.120.12120.112530.630.931.930.616016.71616.516.720018.218.317.318.225017.817.618.317.83151719.517.31740019.529.216.419.550027.13917.827.163030.643.414.830.68003850.915.738100042.35616.442.3125045.66015.845.6160047.861.713.647.8200050.963.114.850.9250050.26312.650.2315052.264.711.252.2400052.86510.952.8500053.4669.753.4630052.4659.652.4800048.6619.748.6100004153.69.4411250034.147.69.434.11600029.743.79.429.7SPL61.774.426.161.7N12.828.50.812.8median 38Blackview R7median 50.9median 14.8median 38Delta14.216.82.814.236.331.432.436.334.429.331.334.431.632.231.731.635.134.12635.138.134.939.438.13132.536.23126.427.228.626.427.527.725.427.527.531.121.327.526.827.523.326.830.627.122.530.638.429.922.438.446.432.921.346.45240.318.45260.847.817.560.865.85517.565.870.661.817.270.67463.816.87473.96317.373.968.957.917.468.968.857.416.668.868.857.717.368.868.65717.668.668.255.217.668.268.453.817.768.469.85517.469.874.359.417.774.375.160.417.975.169.954.818.169.966.35118.166.382.670.729.882.653.425.61.353.4median 68.4ZTE Blade V7 Litemedian 55median 17.7median 68.410.98.91.610.932.537.232.432.532.733.631.332.723.531.231.723.530.833.52630.841.139.139.441.132.933.436.232.928.930.728.628.926.425.825.426.427.324.821.327.328.325.823.328.332.62422.532.638.624.722.438.646.432.421.346.454.537.518.454.55942.917.55959.549.517.559.562.750.117.262.766.952.516.866.971.155.517.371.175.358.217.475.379.162.916.679.180.463.817.380.479.162.217.679.177.660.117.677.675.357.417.775.374.657.417.474.674.356.517.774.372.354.517.972.364.145.818.164.146.227.918.146.287.971.229.887.964.123.81.364.1median 64.1Honor 5Cmedian 50.1median 17.7median 64.114.612.21.614.638.234.432.438.235.235.731.335.228.932.631.728.931.1322631.139.640.339.439.634.133.236.234.126.626.428.626.62622.625.42626.723.121.326.720.823.523.320.824.620.222.524.627.421.222.427.438.923.821.338.944.429.118.444.45134.417.55156.140.117.556.164.546.917.264.568.252.416.868.268.152.617.368.170.154.517.470.170.852.916.670.871.454.117.371.47054.117.6706952.817.66970.954.617.770.96750.217.46769.153.317.769.171.554.717.971.567.951.218.167.963.946.718.163.981.164.729.881.146.116.91.346.1median 67Coolpad Torino Smedian 50.2median 17.7median 671412.11.614hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Blackview R7 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.8% lower than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (42.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 97% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

ZTE Blade V7 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.62 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Honor 5C audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Coolpad Torino S audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.09 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.17 / 1.41 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.83 / 3.21 / 3.45 Watt
Carga midlight 5.67 / 9.16 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Blackview R7
3000 mAh
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2500 mAh
Coolpad Torino S
1800 mAh
LG K10
2300 mAh
Honor 5C
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 5
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
57%
45%
41%
31%
Idle Minimum *
1.83
0.63
66%
0.68
63%
0.89
51%
0.45
75%
Idle Average *
3.21
1.37
57%
2.2
31%
2.07
36%
1.68
48%
Idle Maximum *
3.45
1.71
50%
2.26
34%
2.15
38%
1.71
50%
Load Average *
5.67
2.82
50%
3.47
39%
3.46
39%
6.7
-18%
Load Maximum *
9.16
3.36
63%
3.71
59%
5.18
43%
9.18
-0%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Navegando con WLAN v1.3
6h 52min
Blackview R7
3000 mAh
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2500 mAh
Coolpad Torino S
1800 mAh
LG K10
2300 mAh
Honor 5C
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 5
3000 mAh
Duración de Batería
25%
-4%
10%
42%
22%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
412
517
25%
397
-4%
453
10%
584
42%
504
22%

Pro

+ resolución 1080p
+ 4 GB de RAM
+ 32 GB de ROM
+ brillante panel IPS
+ lector de huellas
+ LTE (banda 20)
+ rendimiento
+ precio-rendimiento

Contra

- calidad de construcción de los botones
- altavoces
- fotos de cámara con tinte de color
- peso
- valor de negro / contraste del display
Blackview R7. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Blackview.
Blackview R7. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Blackview.

Si valoras el Blackview R7 por lo que es – un móvil mainstream barato y no realmente un smartphone insignia, nuestro veredicto es bastante positivo. El almacenamiento interno de 32 GB y 4 GB de RAM son casi demasiado para esta clase. La combinación con el SoC Helio P10 asegura un rendimiento de sistema fluido. Salvo por los botones dedicados, hasta la calidad del chasis convence. 

Las cosas que no nos gustaron tanto incluyen el lentísimo lector de tarjetas microSD y la mala calidad de sonido del altavoz. La cámara principal de 13 MP, que normalmente basta en la práctica, tiene un fuerte tinte de color que afecta a la calidad de las fotos – quizá se pueda arreglar con una actualización software. Un peso de casi 200 gramos también es mucho para un smartphone de 5.5".

El R7 no puede cumplir las expectativas creadas por la buena hoja de especificaciones – hay demasiados sacrificios. Sin embargo, sigue siendo un buen paquete en general por unos 160 Euros.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Blackview R7 - 09/05/AM v5.1
Marcus Herbrich

Acabado
84%
Teclado
68 / 75 → 91%
Ratón
88%
Conectividad
43 / 60 → 72%
Peso
88%
Battería
89%
Pantalla
80%
Rendimiento de juegos
23 / 63 → 36%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
39 / 70 → 56%
Temperatura
89%
Ruido
100%
Audio
50 / 91 → 55%
Cámara
61%
Médio
70%
80%
Smartphone - media ponderada

Pricecompare

> Español - página inicial > Análisis > Breve análisis del Smartphone Blackview R7
Marcus Herbrich, 2016-09-13 (Update: 2016-09-13)