Breve análisis del Smartphone Leagoo M5

Name: Leagoo M5
Brand: Leagoo

¡Caliente! El Leagoo M5 es un smartphone básico asequible con una característica genial - según el fabricante, debería resistir las caídas y la rotura de pantalla. El fabricante instala un marco de metal sólido y un vidrio frontal endurecido especial para lograrlo. Sin embargo, esta resistencia parece cobrarse su precio en la disipación de calor, ya que el M5 muestra su lado caliente en el test.

Marcus Herbrich, ✓ Sven Kloevekorn (traducido por Francisco García), Published 10/09/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Touchscreen Smartphone

Dispositivo de pruebas cortesía de Leagoo

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Leagoo M5 (M Serie)

Procesador

Mediatek MT6580M 4 x 1.3 GHz, Cortex-A7

Adaptador gráfico

ARM Mali-400 MP2

Memoría

2048 MB

, DDR3

pantalla

5.00 pulgadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels 294 PPI, capacitiva, LCD, IPS, a prueba de roturas, lustroso: si

Disco duro

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 10.6 GB libre

Conexiones

1 USB 2.0, Audio Conexiones: clavija headset 3.5mm, Card Reader: micro-SD (T-FLASH), max. 128 GB, 1 Lector de Huellas Digitales, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: movimiento, proximidad

Equipamento de red

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, 3G WCDMA 850/1900/2100 || 2G GSM 850/900/1800/1900, Dual SIM, GPS

Tamaño

Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 8.7 x 141.7 x 71.3

Battería

2300 mAh Litio-Ion, removeable

Sistema Operativo

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 8 MPix flash, f/2.0
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix

Características adicionales

Altavoces: mono, Teclado: virtual, Luz de Teclado: si, adaptador modular de corriente, cable USB, FreeMe OS 6.0, 12 Meses Garantía, fanless

Peso

178 g, Suministro de Electricidad: 35 g

Precio

60 Euros

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

todas las especificaciónes

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Xiaomi Mi 5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	316 MBit/s +565%
Ulefone Metal Mali-T720, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash	88.3 MBit/s +86%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G Mali-T720, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash	48.7 MBit/s +3%
Oukitel U7 Plus Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash	48.3 MBit/s +2%
Leagoo M5 Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash	47.5 MBit/s
Archos 50e Neon Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 8 GB eMMC Flash	42 MBit/s -12%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Xiaomi Mi 5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	265 MBit/s +420%
Ulefone Metal Mali-T720, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash	73.1 MBit/s +43%
Oukitel U7 Plus Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash	52.1 MBit/s +2%
Leagoo M5 Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash	51 MBit/s
Archos 50 Platinum 4G Mali-T720, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash	48.5 MBit/s -5%
Archos 50e Neon Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 8 GB eMMC Flash	46 MBit/s -10%

Comparación de Imágenes

Elige una escena y navega dentro de la primera imagen. Un click cambia el nivel de zoom. Un click en la imagen aumentada abre la original en una ventana nueva. La primera imagen muestra la fotografía escalada del dispositivo de pruebas.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click para cargar imágenes

click para cargar imágenes

click para cargar imágenes


386 cd/m²	395 cd/m²	382 cd/m²
385 cd/m²	401 cd/m²	402 cd/m²
368 cd/m²	384 cd/m²	376 cd/m²

Temperatura del cuarto

LCD tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 402 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 386.6 cd/m² Minimum: 22.87 cd/m²
iluminación: 92 %
Brillo con batería: 401 cd/m²
Contraste: 757:1 (Negro: 0.53 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 13.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.3

	Leagoo M5 IPS, 1280x720, 5.00	Oukitel U7 Plus IPS, 1280x720, 5.50	Oukitel K4000 Pro IPS, 1280x720, 5.00	Ulefone Metal IPS, 1280x720, 5.00	Wiko Jerry IPS, 854x480, 5.00	Wiko Robby IPS, 1280x720, 5.50	Archos 50 Platinum 4G IPS, 1280x720, 5.00	Archos 50e Neon TFT, 854x480, 5.00	Xiaomi Mi 5 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.15
Screen		16%	17%	5%	16%	31%	9%	0%	45%
Brightness middle	401	462 15%	360 -10%	312 -22%	432 8%	621 55%	344 -14%	443 10%	598 49%
Brightness	387	437 13%	367 -5%	315 -19%	436 13%	576 49%	349 -10%	430 11%	566 46%
Brightness Distribution	92	91 -1%	89 -3%	87 -5%	91 -1%	88 -4%	89 -3%	94 2%	90 -2%
Black Level *	0.53	0.58 -9%	0.36 32%	0.56 -6%	0.57 -8%	0.73 -38%	0.65 -23%	0.38 28%	0.51 4%
Contrast	757	797 5%	1000 32%	557 -26%	758 0%	851 12%	529 -30%	1166 54%	1173 55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	9.7	7.5 23%	9.01 7%	6.8 30%	7 28%	4.7 52%	5.8 40%	13.9 -43%	3.5 64%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	22.3	12.8 43%	12.58 44%	14 37%	12.4 44%	9.4 58%	10.7 52%	29.5 -32%	6.1 73%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	13.3	8.5 36%	8.67 35%	7.1 47%	7.6 43%	5.2 61%	5.7 57%	17.3 -30%	3.5 74%
Gamma	2.3 ^96%	2.54 ^87%	2.66 ^83%	2.77 ^79%	2.1 ^105%	2.51 ^88%	2.1 ^105%	2.93 ^75%	2.29 ^96%
CCT	10359 ^63%	8914 ^73%	7641 ^85%	7402 ^88%	8368 ^78%	7505 ^87%	7792 ^83%	22878 ^28%	6532 ^100%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

ℹ

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.

↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
28 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↗ 11 ms subida
28 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↘ 17 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 67 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21.5 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
33 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↗ 14 ms subida
33 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↘ 19 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 38 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (33.8 ms).

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 17933 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 3846000) Hz.

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5	18.48 MB/s
Oukitel U7 Plus	22.6 MB/s +22%
Ulefone Metal	27.6 MB/s +49%
Wiko Jerry	19.12 MB/s +3%
Wiko Robby	19.68 MB/s +6%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	15.58 MB/s -16%
Archos 50e Neon	18.87 MB/s +2%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5	36.07 MB/s
Oukitel U7 Plus	46.63 MB/s +29%
Ulefone Metal	49.6 MB/s +38%
Wiko Jerry	40.91 MB/s +13%
Wiko Robby	41.39 MB/s +15%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	31.85 MB/s -12%
Archos 50e Neon	35.27 MB/s -2%
Random Write 4KB (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5	5.46 MB/s
Oukitel U7 Plus	2.18 MB/s -60%
Oukitel K4000 Pro	7.5 MB/s +37%
Ulefone Metal	7.87 MB/s +44%
Wiko Jerry	6.4 MB/s +17%
Wiko Robby	6.9 MB/s +26%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	4.35 MB/s -20%
Archos 50e Neon	5.18 MB/s -5%
Xiaomi Mi 5	13.61 MB/s +149%
Random Read 4KB (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5	14.98 MB/s
Oukitel U7 Plus	11.25 MB/s -25%
Oukitel K4000 Pro	13.79 MB/s -8%
Ulefone Metal	22.18 MB/s +48%
Wiko Jerry	14.97 MB/s 0%
Wiko Robby	15.7 MB/s +5%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	14.31 MB/s -4%
Archos 50e Neon	15.29 MB/s +2%
Xiaomi Mi 5	106.8 MB/s +613%
Sequential Write 256KB (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5	12.11 MB/s
Oukitel U7 Plus	59 MB/s +387%
Oukitel K4000 Pro	39.82 MB/s +229%
Ulefone Metal	39.91 MB/s +230%
Wiko Jerry	12.11 MB/s 0%
Wiko Robby	47.6 MB/s +293%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	7.56 MB/s -38%
Archos 50e Neon	8.33 MB/s -31%
Xiaomi Mi 5	159.3 MB/s +1215%
Sequential Read 256KB (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5	133.7 MB/s
Oukitel U7 Plus	125.9 MB/s -6%
Oukitel K4000 Pro	191.3 MB/s +43%
Ulefone Metal	228.8 MB/s +71%
Wiko Jerry	132.8 MB/s -1%
Wiko Robby	126.2 MB/s -6%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	125.4 MB/s -6%
Archos 50e Neon	130.3 MB/s -3%
Xiaomi Mi 5	459.6 MB/s +244%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5	24238 Points
Oukitel U7 Plus	28683 Points +18%
Oukitel K4000 Pro	24028 Points -1%
Ulefone Metal	37103 Points +53%
Wiko Jerry	15185 Points -37%
Wiko Robby	15797 Points -35%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	23657 Points -2%
Archos 50e Neon	24509 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi 5	116330 Points +380%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5	2921 Points
Oukitel U7 Plus	3656 Points +25%
Oukitel K4000 Pro	3046 Points +4%
Ulefone Metal	7059 Points +142%
Wiko Jerry	2922 Points 0%
Wiko Robby	2921 Points 0%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	3103 Points +6%
Archos 50e Neon	2930 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 5	29246 Points +901%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5	2478 Points
Oukitel U7 Plus	3137 Points +27%
Oukitel K4000 Pro	2609 Points +5%
Ulefone Metal	6469 Points +161%
Wiko Jerry	2481 Points 0%
Wiko Robby	2476 Points 0%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	2681 Points +8%
Archos 50e Neon	2485 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 5	32613 Points +1216%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5	7886 Points
Oukitel U7 Plus	8660 Points +10%
Oukitel K4000 Pro	7370 Points -7%
Ulefone Metal	10371 Points +32%
Wiko Jerry	7748 Points -2%
Wiko Robby	7868 Points 0%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	6902 Points -12%
Archos 50e Neon	7848 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 5	21483 Points +172%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus	155 Points
Oukitel K4000 Pro	123 Points
Ulefone Metal	293 Points
Xiaomi Mi 5	3542 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus	126 Points
Oukitel K4000 Pro	100 Points
Ulefone Metal	243 Points
Xiaomi Mi 5	4558 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus	749 Points
Oukitel K4000 Pro	604 Points
Ulefone Metal	1057 Points
Xiaomi Mi 5	1976 Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5	8 fps
Oukitel U7 Plus	9.8 fps +23%
Oukitel K4000 Pro	8.5 fps +6%
Ulefone Metal	12 fps +50%
Wiko Jerry	11 fps +38%
Wiko Robby	7.9 fps -1%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	4.9 fps -39%
Archos 50e Neon	4.4 fps -45%
Xiaomi Mi 5	60 fps +650%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5	4.4 fps
Oukitel U7 Plus	5.9 fps +34%
Ulefone Metal	19 fps +332%
Wiko Jerry	4.4 fps 0%
Wiko Robby	4.4 fps 0%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	8.7 fps +98%
Archos 50e Neon	11 fps +150%
Xiaomi Mi 5	90 fps +1945%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5	2808 Points
Oukitel U7 Plus	3105 Points +11%
Oukitel K4000 Pro	2757 Points -2%
Ulefone Metal	4079 Points +45%
Wiko Jerry	2636 Points -6%
Wiko Robby	2785 Points -1%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	2807 Points 0%
Archos 50e Neon	2796 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 5	6873 Points +145%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5	144 Points
Oukitel U7 Plus	568 Points +294%
Oukitel K4000 Pro	428 Points +197%
Ulefone Metal	273 Points +90%
Wiko Jerry	379 Points +163%
Wiko Robby	432 Points +200%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	148 Points +3%
Archos 50e Neon	389 Points +170%
Xiaomi Mi 5	2392 Points +1561%
System (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5	990 Points
Oukitel U7 Plus	1120 Points +13%
Oukitel K4000 Pro	840 Points -15%
Ulefone Metal	1691 Points +71%
Wiko Jerry	966 Points -2%
Wiko Robby	983 Points -1%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	838 Points -15%
Archos 50e Neon	990 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 5	3638 Points +267%
Memory (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5	331 Points
Oukitel U7 Plus	770 Points +133%
Oukitel K4000 Pro	409 Points +24%
Ulefone Metal	802 Points +142%
Wiko Jerry	290 Points -12%
Wiko Robby	404 Points +22%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	354 Points +7%
Archos 50e Neon	317 Points -4%
Xiaomi Mi 5	1801 Points +444%
Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5	139 Points
Oukitel U7 Plus	211 Points +52%
Oukitel K4000 Pro	173 Points +24%
Ulefone Metal	433 Points +212%
Wiko Jerry	139 Points 0%
Wiko Robby	137 Points -1%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	175 Points +26%
Archos 50e Neon	138 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi 5	4522 Points +3153%
Web (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5	9 Points
Oukitel U7 Plus	573 Points +6267%
Oukitel K4000 Pro	563 Points +6156%
Ulefone Metal	10 Points +11%
Wiko Jerry	530 Points +5789%
Wiko Robby	640 Points +7011%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	9 Points 0%
Archos 50e Neon	525 Points +5733%
Xiaomi Mi 5	1106 Points +12189%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5	1166 Points
Oukitel U7 Plus	1508 Points +29%
Ulefone Metal	2458 Points +111%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	1206 Points +3%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5	407 Points
Oukitel U7 Plus	580 Points +43%
Ulefone Metal	609 Points +50%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	428 Points +5%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5	14.45 Points
Oukitel U7 Plus	17.26 Points +19%
Oukitel K4000 Pro	13.44 Points -7%
Ulefone Metal	17.83 Points +23%
Wiko Jerry	14 Points -3%
Wiko Robby	13.55 Points -6%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	12.76 Points -12%
Archos 50e Neon	14.12 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mi 5	54 Points +274%

Octane V2 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5	2144 Points
Oukitel U7 Plus	2554 Points +19%
Oukitel K4000 Pro	2200 Points +3%
Ulefone Metal	2738 Points +28%
Wiko Jerry	2075 Points -3%
Wiko Robby	2159 Points +1%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	2122 Points -1%
Archos 50e Neon	2103 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mi 5	8619 Points +302%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5	14767 ms *
Oukitel U7 Plus	14931 ms * -1%
Oukitel K4000 Pro	18251 ms * -24%
Ulefone Metal	13397 ms * +9%
Wiko Jerry	14923 ms * -1%
Wiko Robby	15131 ms * -2%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	19092 ms * -29%
Archos 50e Neon	15157 ms * -3%
Xiaomi Mi 5	2973 ms * +80%

Leyenda

Leagoo M5 Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Oukitel U7 Plus Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Oukitel K4000 Pro Mediatek MT6735, , 16 GB eMMC Flash

Ulefone Metal Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Wiko Jerry Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Wiko Robby Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Archos 50 Platinum 4G Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Archos 50e Neon Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Mi 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.

Inactivo


45.6 °C	45.3 °C	41 °C
46.1 °C	46.4 °C	40.6 °C
44.6 °C	42.1 °C	40.9 °C

Máximo: 46.4 °C
Médio: 43.6 °C


39.5 °C	39.7 °C	44.1 °C
39 °C	40 °C	44.8 °C
39 °C	39 °C	48.1 °C

Máximo: 48.1 °C
Médio: 41.5 °C

Conector de corriente 38.4 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.4 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.1 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(-) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Leagoo M5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 41.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Oukitel U7 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (34.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Ulefone Metal audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Archos 50 Platinum 4G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 8.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de corriente

Off / Standby	0.09 / 0.14 Watt
Ocioso	0.81 / 2.26 / 2.39 Watt
Carga	6.97 / 7.03 Watt


Clave: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Leagoo M5 2300 mAh	Oukitel U7 Plus 2500 mAh	Oukitel K4000 Pro 4600 mAh	Ulefone Metal 3050 mAh	Wiko Jerry 2000 mAh	Wiko Robby 2500 mAh	Archos 50 Platinum 4G 2200 mAh	Archos 50e Neon 2200 mAh
Power Consumption		-2%	-65%	-15%	14%	7%	31%	27%
Idle Minimum *	0.81	0.86 -6%	2.74 -238%	1.41 -74%	0.8 1%	0.92 -14%	0.59 27%	0.56 31%
Idle Average *	2.26	2.68 -19%	3.92 -73%	2.46 -9%	2.02 11%	2.12 6%	1.68 26%	1.58 30%
Idle Maximum *	2.39	2.78 -16%	4.05 -69%	2.83 -18%	2.19 8%	2.34 2%	1.79 25%	1.8 25%
Load Average *	6.97	5.33 24%	4.84 31%	5.15 26%	5.02 28%	5.3 24%	4.22 39%	5.22 25%
Load Maximum *	7.03	6.49 8%	5.42 23%	7.05 -0%	5.52 21%	5.78 18%	4.26 39%	5.34 24%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería


WiFi Websurfing		6h 46min

	Leagoo M5 2300 mAh	Oukitel U7 Plus 2500 mAh	Oukitel K4000 Pro 4600 mAh	Ulefone Metal 3050 mAh	Wiko Jerry 2000 mAh	Wiko Robby 2500 mAh	Archos 50 Platinum 4G 2200 mAh	Archos 50e Neon 2200 mAh
Duración de Batería
WiFi v1.3	406	366 -10%	711 75%	403 -1%	475 17%	712 75%	384 -5%	498 23%

Pro

+ panel HD IPS

+ 2 GB de RAM

+ 16 GB de ROM

+ dual-SIM + ranura SD

+ lector de huellas

+ resistencia

Contra

- SoC lento

- calor residual

- almacenamiento eMMC lento

- brillo de pantalla ligeramente bajo

- tiras en la pantalla

- relativamente pesado

- altavoz

- sin LTE

- teclas no iluminadas

Leogoo M5. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Leagoo.

Aunque nuestros contras superan los pros del Leagoo M5, el dispositivo básico de 65 Euros no es inevitablemente un mal smartphone. La configuración técnica y su resistencia a influencias externas (aún cuando no pudimos testar este hecho) son un fuerte argumento de compra para este nivel de precios. Sin embargo, otros smartphones ofrecen un paquete total mejor aunque tengan un precio de compra más alto. Ante todo, nombraríamos al UleFone Meta o UHANS S1. Los compradores que no quieren tratar con importadores pueden encontrar la alternativa adecuada en el Coolpad Porto S o ZTE's Blade A452.

Demasiadas cosas que criticar nos impiden darle al Leagoo M5 una recomendación de compra a pesar de las buenas especificaciones técnicas y el bajísimo precio de compra.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Leagoo M5 - 2016-10-06 10/06/2016 v5.1^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Acabado

85%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 86%

Ratón

85%

Conectividad

34 / 60 → 56%

Peso

90%

Battería

89%

Pantalla

78%

Rendimiento de juegos

5 / 63 → 7%

Rendimiento de la Aplicación

23 / 70 → 33%

Temperatura

80%

Ruido

100%

Audio

52 / 91 → 57%

Cámara

62%

Médio

65%

78%

Smartphone - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Smartphone Leagoo M5

Marcus Herbrich, 2016-10- 9 (Update: 2016-10- 9)