Notebookcheck Logo

Breve análisis del Smartphone Oukitel U7 Plus

Allí dónde hay mucha luz, la sombra tiende a ser profunda. Está bastante justificado ser escéptico respecto a la calidad de los smartphones que se venden a unos 75 Euros. Oukitel, empero, demuestra que un fabricante puede crear un dispositivo atractivo en el sector de muy bajo presupuesto con su modelo U7 Plus. Aunque hay que hacer sacrificios al comprar el smartphone básico, el Oukitel U7 Plus convence con su buena relación precio-rendimiento.
Oukitel U7 Plus (U Serie)
Procesador
Mediatek MT6737 4 x 1.3 GHz, Cortex-A53
Adaptador gráfico
Memoría
2048 MB 
pantalla
5.50 pulgadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels 267 PPI, capacitiva, LCD, IPS, lustroso: si
Disco duro
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 11.61 GB libre
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, Audio Conexiones: clavija headset 3.5mm, Card Reader: micro-SD max. 32 GB, 1 Lector de Huellas Digitales, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: posición, proximidad
Equipamento de red
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, 2G: 850/900/1800/1900 MHz, 3G: 900/2100 MHz; 4G: 800/900/1800/2100/2600 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 9.15 x 157.6 x 78.4
Battería
2500 mAh Litio-Polimero, removeable
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix interpolada a 13MP
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix interpolada a 5MP
Características adicionales
Altavoces: mono, Teclado: virtual, Luz de Teclado: si, adaptador modular de corriente, USB cable, Oukitel UI, 12 Meses Garantía, fanless
Peso
195 g
Precio
75 Euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

157.6 mm 78.4 mm 9.15 mm 195 g154.5 mm 76 mm 8.8 mm 199 g145.1 mm 73.5 mm 9.6 mm 166 g145 mm 72 mm 9.4 mm 152 g145 mm 72 mm 9.4 mm 152 g144 mm 72 mm 8.8 mm 141 g143.8 mm 72 mm 8.9 mm 135 g143 mm 71 mm 9.35 mm 155 g143 mm 72 mm 7.6 mm 125 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Moto Z
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
491 MBit/s +917%
Ulefone Metal
Mali-T720, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
88.3 MBit/s +83%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
Mali-T720, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 MBit/s +1%
Huawei Y5 II
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.3 MBit/s 0%
Oukitel U7 Plus
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
48.3 MBit/s
TP-Link Neffos C5
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
44.9 MBit/s -7%
Archos 50e Neon
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 8 GB eMMC Flash
42 MBit/s -13%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Moto Z
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
360 MBit/s +591%
Ulefone Metal
Mali-T720, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
73.1 MBit/s +40%
Huawei Y5 II
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash
52.9 MBit/s +2%
Oukitel U7 Plus
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
52.1 MBit/s
TP-Link Neffos C5
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.3 MBit/s -5%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
Mali-T720, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.5 MBit/s -7%
Archos 50e Neon
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 8 GB eMMC Flash
46 MBit/s -12%
GPS test Oukitel U7 Plus
GPS test Oukitel U7 Plus
GPS test Oukitel U7 Plus
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500

Comparación de Imágenes

Elige una escena y navega dentro de la primera imagen. Un click cambia el nivel de zoom. Un click en la imagen aumentada abre la original en una ventana nueva. La primera imagen muestra la fotografía escalada del dispositivo de pruebas.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click para cargar imágenes
423
cd/m²
454
cd/m²
428
cd/m²
423
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
423
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
LCD tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 462 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 436.6 cd/m² Minimum: 24.3 cd/m²
iluminación: 91 %
Brillo con batería: 462 cd/m²
Contraste: 797:1 (Negro: 0.58 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 8.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.54
Oukitel U7 Plus
IPS, 1280x720, 5.50
Ulefone Metal
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
TP-Link Neffos C5
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
Coolpad Porto S
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
Huawei Y5 II
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
Wiko Jerry
IPS, 854x480, 5.00
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
Archos 50e Neon
TFT, 854x480, 5.00
UMI Touch
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50
Lenovo Moto Z
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.50
Screen
-9%
7%
-7%
-13%
2%
-3%
-30%
4%
36%
Brightness middle
462
312
-32%
508
10%
407
-12%
465
1%
432
-6%
344
-26%
443
-4%
424
-8%
485
5%
Brightness
437
315
-28%
491
12%
403
-8%
443
1%
436
0%
349
-20%
430
-2%
415
-5%
490
12%
Brightness Distribution
91
87
-4%
89
-2%
92
1%
90
-1%
91
0%
89
-2%
94
3%
91
0%
92
1%
Black Level *
0.58
0.56
3%
0.58
-0%
0.5
14%
0.84
-45%
0.57
2%
0.65
-12%
0.38
34%
0.54
7%
Contrast
797
557
-30%
876
10%
814
2%
554
-30%
758
-5%
529
-34%
1166
46%
785
-2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
7.5
6.8
9%
7
7%
7.9
-5%
7.8
-4%
7
7%
5.8
23%
13.9
-85%
6.9
8%
2.1
72%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
12.8
14
-9%
14.1
-10%
18.2
-42%
15.7
-23%
12.4
3%
10.7
16%
29.5
-130%
10.9
15%
5.5
57%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
8.5
7.1
16%
6.1
28%
8.9
-5%
8.4
1%
7.6
11%
5.7
33%
17.3
-104%
6.8
20%
2.6
69%
Gamma
2.54 87%
2.77 79%
2.15 102%
2.46 89%
2.07 106%
2.1 105%
2.1 105%
2.93 75%
1.99 111%
2.23 99%
CCT
8914 73%
7402 88%
8068 81%
8332 78%
8438 77%
8368 78%
7792 83%
22878 28%
8131 80%
6843 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
88.14
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
29 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 10 ms subida
↘ 19 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 73 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21.6 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
28 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 13 ms subida
↘ 15 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 31 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (33.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 18062 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 3846000) Hz.

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus
22.6 MB/s
Ulefone Metal
27.6 MB/s +22%
TP-Link Neffos C5
18.89 MB/s -16%
Huawei Y5 II
18.03 MB/s -20%
Wiko Jerry
19.12 MB/s -15%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
15.58 MB/s -31%
UMI Touch
21.02 MB/s -7%
Lenovo Moto Z
45.64 MB/s +102%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus
46.63 MB/s
Ulefone Metal
49.6 MB/s +6%
TP-Link Neffos C5
39.11 MB/s -16%
Huawei Y5 II
29.47 MB/s -37%
Wiko Jerry
40.91 MB/s -12%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
31.85 MB/s -32%
UMI Touch
42.92 MB/s -8%
Lenovo Moto Z
78.5 MB/s +68%
Random Write 4KB (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus
2.18 MB/s
Ulefone Metal
7.87 MB/s +261%
TP-Link Neffos C5
6.85 MB/s +214%
Coolpad Porto S
13.95 MB/s +540%
Huawei Y5 II
6 MB/s +175%
Wiko Jerry
6.4 MB/s +194%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
4.35 MB/s +100%
UMI Touch
14.63 MB/s +571%
Lenovo Moto Z
74.9 MB/s +3336%
Random Read 4KB (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus
11.25 MB/s
Ulefone Metal
22.18 MB/s +97%
TP-Link Neffos C5
17.16 MB/s +53%
Coolpad Porto S
22.52 MB/s +100%
Huawei Y5 II
27.3 MB/s +143%
Wiko Jerry
14.97 MB/s +33%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
14.31 MB/s +27%
UMI Touch
19.88 MB/s +77%
Lenovo Moto Z
117.2 MB/s +942%
Sequential Write 256KB (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus
59 MB/s
Ulefone Metal
39.91 MB/s -32%
TP-Link Neffos C5
52.4 MB/s -11%
Coolpad Porto S
39.99 MB/s -32%
Huawei Y5 II
21.6 MB/s -63%
Wiko Jerry
12.11 MB/s -79%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
7.56 MB/s -87%
UMI Touch
72.5 MB/s +23%
Lenovo Moto Z
168.3 MB/s +185%
Sequential Read 256KB (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus
125.9 MB/s
Ulefone Metal
228.8 MB/s +82%
TP-Link Neffos C5
145.8 MB/s +16%
Coolpad Porto S
168.2 MB/s +34%
Huawei Y5 II
173.3 MB/s +38%
Wiko Jerry
132.8 MB/s +5%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
125.4 MB/s 0%
UMI Touch
219.3 MB/s +74%
Lenovo Moto Z
439.7 MB/s +249%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus
28683 Points
Ulefone Metal
37103 Points +29%
TP-Link Neffos C5
32681 Points +14%
Coolpad Porto S
25415 Points -11%
Huawei Y5 II
23795 Points -17%
Wiko Jerry
15185 Points -47%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
23657 Points -18%
UMI Touch
38617 Points +35%
Lenovo Moto Z
129197 Points +350%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus
3656 Points
Ulefone Metal
7059 Points +93%
TP-Link Neffos C5
4906 Points +34%
Coolpad Porto S
3028 Points -17%
Huawei Y5 II
Points -100%
Wiko Jerry
2922 Points -20%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
3103 Points -15%
UMI Touch
6795 Points +86%
Lenovo Moto Z
25135 Points +588%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus
3137 Points
Ulefone Metal
6469 Points +106%
TP-Link Neffos C5
4223 Points +35%
Coolpad Porto S
2590 Points -17%
Huawei Y5 II
Points -100%
Wiko Jerry
2481 Points -21%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2681 Points -15%
UMI Touch
6186 Points +97%
Lenovo Moto Z
26659 Points +750%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus
8660 Points
Ulefone Metal
10371 Points +20%
TP-Link Neffos C5
9291 Points +7%
Coolpad Porto S
7413 Points -14%
Huawei Y5 II
Points -100%
Wiko Jerry
7748 Points -11%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
6902 Points -20%
UMI Touch
10368 Points +20%
Lenovo Moto Z
20948 Points +142%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus
155 Points
Ulefone Metal
293 Points +89%
TP-Link Neffos C5
203 Points +31%
Huawei Y5 II
Points -100%
UMI Touch
291 Points +88%
Lenovo Moto Z
3023 Points +1850%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus
126 Points
Ulefone Metal
243 Points +93%
TP-Link Neffos C5
167 Points +33%
Huawei Y5 II
Points -100%
UMI Touch
241 Points +91%
Lenovo Moto Z
3718 Points +2851%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus
749 Points
Ulefone Metal
1057 Points +41%
TP-Link Neffos C5
810 Points +8%
Huawei Y5 II
Points -100%
UMI Touch
1045 Points +40%
Lenovo Moto Z
1828 Points +144%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus
9.8 fps
Ulefone Metal
12 fps +22%
TP-Link Neffos C5
8.3 fps -15%
Coolpad Porto S
4.8 fps -51%
Huawei Y5 II
15 fps +53%
Wiko Jerry
11 fps +12%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
4.9 fps -50%
UMI Touch
12 fps +22%
Lenovo Moto Z
53 fps +441%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus
5.9 fps
Ulefone Metal
19 fps +222%
TP-Link Neffos C5
14 fps +137%
Coolpad Porto S
8.6 fps +46%
Huawei Y5 II
8.4 fps +42%
Wiko Jerry
4.4 fps -25%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
8.7 fps +47%
UMI Touch
12 fps +103%
Lenovo Moto Z
77 fps +1205%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus
2.1 fps
Ulefone Metal
6.4 fps +205%
TP-Link Neffos C5
2.8 fps +33%
Coolpad Porto S
1.6 fps -24%
Huawei Y5 II
6.1 fps +190%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
1.2 fps -43%
UMI Touch
4.5 fps +114%
Lenovo Moto Z
26 fps +1138%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus
4.4 fps
Ulefone Metal
2.9 fps -34%
TP-Link Neffos C5
6.1 fps +39%
Coolpad Porto S
3.6 fps -18%
Huawei Y5 II
fps -100%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
3.6 fps -18%
UMI Touch
4.5 fps +2%
Lenovo Moto Z
41 fps +832%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus
3.2 fps
Ulefone Metal
4.5 fps +41%
Huawei Y5 II
fps -100%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
1.2 fps -62%
UMI Touch
2.9 fps -9%
Lenovo Moto Z
15 fps +369%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus
1.4 fps
Ulefone Metal
8.9 fps +536%
Huawei Y5 II
fps -100%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2.7 fps +93%
UMI Touch
2.9 fps +107%
Lenovo Moto Z
27 fps +1829%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus
3105 Points
Ulefone Metal
4079 Points +31%
TP-Link Neffos C5
3443 Points +11%
Coolpad Porto S
2893 Points -7%
Huawei Y5 II
3237 Points +4%
Wiko Jerry
2636 Points -15%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2807 Points -10%
UMI Touch
3787 Points +22%
Lenovo Moto Z
7637 Points +146%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus
568 Points
Ulefone Metal
273 Points -52%
TP-Link Neffos C5
683 Points +20%
Coolpad Porto S
458 Points -19%
Huawei Y5 II
183 Points -68%
Wiko Jerry
379 Points -33%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
148 Points -74%
UMI Touch
717 Points +26%
Lenovo Moto Z
2356 Points +315%
System (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus
1120 Points
Ulefone Metal
1691 Points +51%
TP-Link Neffos C5
1199 Points +7%
Coolpad Porto S
905 Points -19%
Huawei Y5 II
1094 Points -2%
Wiko Jerry
966 Points -14%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
838 Points -25%
UMI Touch
1343 Points +20%
Lenovo Moto Z
3398 Points +203%
Memory (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus
770 Points
Ulefone Metal
802 Points +4%
TP-Link Neffos C5
991 Points +29%
Coolpad Porto S
467 Points -39%
Huawei Y5 II
375 Points -51%
Wiko Jerry
290 Points -62%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
354 Points -54%
UMI Touch
787 Points +2%
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points +184%
Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus
211 Points
Ulefone Metal
433 Points +105%
TP-Link Neffos C5
281 Points +33%
Coolpad Porto S
173 Points -18%
Huawei Y5 II
283 Points +34%
Wiko Jerry
139 Points -34%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
175 Points -17%
UMI Touch
429 Points +103%
Lenovo Moto Z
4321 Points +1948%
Web (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus
573 Points
Ulefone Metal
10 Points -98%
TP-Link Neffos C5
638 Points +11%
Coolpad Porto S
599 Points +5%
Huawei Y5 II
10 Points -98%
Wiko Jerry
530 Points -8%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
9 Points -98%
UMI Touch
576 Points +1%
Lenovo Moto Z
959 Points +67%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus
1508 Points
Ulefone Metal
2458 Points +63%
Huawei Y5 II
1573 Points +4%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
1206 Points -20%
Lenovo Moto Z
3946 Points +162%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus
580 Points
Ulefone Metal
609 Points +5%
Huawei Y5 II
561 Points -3%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
428 Points -26%
Lenovo Moto Z
1480 Points +155%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus
14931 ms *
Ulefone Metal
13397 ms * +10%
TP-Link Neffos C5
12783 ms * +14%
Coolpad Porto S
32901 ms * -120%
Huawei Y5 II
12505 ms * +16%
Wiko Jerry
14923 ms * -0%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
19092 ms * -28%
UMI Touch
13953 ms * +7%
Lenovo Moto Z
3155 ms * +79%
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus
2554 Points
Ulefone Metal
2738 Points +7%
TP-Link Neffos C5
2738 Points +7%
Coolpad Porto S
2088 Points -18%
Huawei Y5 II
2707 Points +6%
Wiko Jerry
2075 Points -19%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2122 Points -17%
UMI Touch
2562 Points 0%
Lenovo Moto Z
7771 Points +204%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus
17.26 Points
Ulefone Metal
17.83 Points +3%
TP-Link Neffos C5
18.21 Points +6%
Coolpad Porto S
14.17 Points -18%
Huawei Y5 II
18.47 Points +7%
Wiko Jerry
14 Points -19%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
12.76 Points -26%
UMI Touch
17.61 Points +2%
Lenovo Moto Z
47.5 Points +175%

Leyenda

 
Oukitel U7 Plus Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Ulefone Metal Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
TP-Link Neffos C5 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Coolpad Porto S Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y5 II Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Wiko Jerry Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Archos 50 Platinum 4G Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
UMI Touch Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.
 42.1 °C41.8 °C42.3 °C 
 43.5 °C43 °C42.6 °C 
 41.6 °C41.8 °C42.8 °C 
Máximo: 43.5 °C
Médio: 42.4 °C
38.3 °C38.9 °C41.7 °C
37.7 °C38.7 °C42.1 °C
37.9 °C39.6 °C41.7 °C
Máximo: 42.1 °C
Médio: 39.6 °C
Conector de corriente  39.4 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.641.52525.435.73125.336.54032.936.45033.636.86331.637.18028.428100272812520.826.9160222320021.324.325020.830.431521.236.540019.445.450019.551.963017.75580017.959.7100017.863.5125017.364.2160017.466.8200016.766.7250017.263.7315018.268.6400017.975.1500017.676.6630017.767.4800017.865.81000017.965.71250018.157.21600018.245.5SPL3081.6N1.343.6median 17.9median 59.7Delta1.412.720.622.921.920.620.721.720.320.722.32123.622.322.626.934.422.621.222.321.921.217.820.318.917.817.918.118.617.922.522.823.922.534.733.236.134.716.72617.216.716.433.215.816.419.438.919.119.422.345.519.122.327.552.717.927.533.658.319.133.639.163.216.139.143.466.515.543.442.764.716.442.739.26213.739.236.8601336.834.857.913.934.834.558.911.434.537.861.110.737.839.16310.339.141.464.29.841.442.7689.442.748.271.69.548.240.764.99.440.730.755.79.630.726.850.39.426.852.876.426.652.88.337.30.98.3median 34.8median 58.9median 13.9median 34.87.710.24.17.735.945.932.435.935.635.831.335.629.329.131.729.328.926.52628.939.938.939.439.929.73536.229.728.126.928.628.123.82725.423.825.926.621.325.928.72423.328.731.923.522.531.940.821.522.440.849.428.921.349.454.13418.454.161.443.217.561.469.149.717.569.173.85417.273.876.958.516.876.974.157.417.374.171.352.317.471.370.95116.670.970.550.317.370.574.955.317.674.973.253.317.673.271.952.317.771.974.154.117.474.174.654.517.774.671.251.817.971.262.443.118.162.452.933.418.152.984.965.829.884.961.318.91.361.3median 70.5median 50.3median 17.7median 70.512.211.11.712.241.632.932.441.638.232.731.338.235.932.731.735.934.335.92634.347.247.339.447.232.632.336.232.629.82928.629.832.620.525.432.629.725.221.329.7352223.3353923.822.53944.327.422.444.348.83321.348.854.539.218.454.560.443.217.560.465.349.817.565.370.75417.270.774.657.716.874.673.657.717.373.673.957.117.473.975.258.616.675.274.15817.374.173.957.417.673.972.556.717.672.573.757.217.773.774.357.417.474.372.757.117.772.769.352.817.969.360.945.118.160.94932.718.1498568.629.88560.522.41.360.5median 69.3median 52.8median 17.7median 69.311.912.41.711.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOukitel U7 PlusUlefone MetalCoolpad Porto SWiko Jerry
Oukitel U7 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (34.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Ulefone Metal audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Coolpad Porto S audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 37.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Wiko Jerry audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.09 / 0.32 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.86 / 2.68 / 2.78 Watt
Carga midlight 5.33 / 6.49 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Oukitel U7 Plus
2500 mAh
Ulefone Metal
3050 mAh
TP-Link Neffos C5
2200 mAh
Coolpad Porto S
2000 mAh
Huawei Y5 II
2200 mAh
Wiko Jerry
2000 mAh
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2200 mAh
Archos 50e Neon
2200 mAh
UMI Touch
4000 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z
2600 mAh
Power Consumption
-13%
13%
16%
37%
15%
32%
26%
17%
29%
Idle Minimum *
0.86
1.41
-64%
0.72
16%
1.16
-35%
0.54
37%
0.8
7%
0.59
31%
0.56
35%
0.89
-3%
0.66
23%
Idle Average *
2.68
2.46
8%
1.87
30%
2.21
18%
1.58
41%
2.02
25%
1.68
37%
1.58
41%
2
25%
1.01
62%
Idle Maximum *
2.78
2.83
-2%
2
28%
2.24
19%
1.7
39%
2.19
21%
1.79
36%
1.8
35%
2.1
24%
1.09
61%
Load Average *
5.33
5.15
3%
5.99
-12%
3.34
37%
2.98
44%
5.02
6%
4.22
21%
5.22
2%
3.87
27%
3.97
26%
Load Maximum *
6.49
7.05
-9%
6.45
1%
3.95
39%
4.98
23%
5.52
15%
4.26
34%
5.34
18%
5.79
11%
8.34
-29%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
WiFi Websurfing
6h 06min
Oukitel U7 Plus
2500 mAh
Ulefone Metal
3050 mAh
TP-Link Neffos C5
2200 mAh
Coolpad Porto S
2000 mAh
Huawei Y5 II
2200 mAh
Wiko Jerry
2000 mAh
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2200 mAh
Archos 50e Neon
2200 mAh
UMI Touch
4000 mAh
Duración de Batería
WiFi v1.3
366
403
10%
453
24%
504
38%
503
37%
475
30%
384
5%
498
36%
553
51%

Pro

+ precio-rendimiento
+ brillante panel HD IPS
+ dual-SIM + ampliación de almacenamiento
+ LTE (incluyendo banda 20)
+ decente rendimiento (para su precio)
+ lector de huellas
+ 2 GB de RAM
+ 16 GB de ROM

Contra

- peso + dimensiones
- SoC lento
- rendimiento de juego
- almacenamiento eMMC lento
- cámara
Oukitel U7 Plus. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Oukitel.
Oukitel U7 Plus. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Oukitel.

El Oukitel U7 Plus causó una buena impresión en general en el test. Visto el precio de unos 70 Euros a través de importadores, los compradores potenciales se llevan algo más que un sólido smartphone básico del segmento de bajo presupuesto. El Oukitel U7 Plus tiene bastante que ofrecer para un smartphone tan barato: un brillante panel HD IPS, soporte LTE, un lector de huellas que funciona bien, generosa memoria (16 GB ROM, 2 GB RAM), y gran flexibilidad gracias a la funcionalidad dual-SIM además de la opción de ampliación de almacenamiento y la batería fácil de cambiar.

Si el precio es un factor muy limitante a la hora de comprar un smartphone, el Oukitel es definitivamente una opción.

Por supuesto, hay que hacer sacrificios en el rendimiento (gráfico), la calidad de la cámara, la velocidad de la memoria, y el manejo. Sin embargo, las cualidades positivas del Oukitel U7 Plus predominan, a nuestro parecer.

Podemos recomendar el UleFone Metal como una alternativa interesante y algo más útil al modelo de Oukitel. Su PVP de unos 100 Euros es muy asequible, y también ofrece un paquete mejor en general.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Oukitel U7 Plus - 10/03/2016 v5.1(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Acabado
82%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 86%
Ratón
86%
Conectividad
34 / 60 → 57%
Peso
88%
Battería
88%
Pantalla
80%
Rendimiento de juegos
8 / 63 → 13%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
30 / 70 → 42%
Temperatura
84%
Ruido
100%
Audio
69 / 91 → 76%
Cámara
60%
Médio
67%
78%
Smartphone - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Smartphone Oukitel U7 Plus
Marcus Herbrich, 2016-10- 9 (Update: 2016-10- 9)