Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del Smartphone UleFone Metal

Marcus Herbrich (traducido por Francisco García), 09/29/PM

Rácano bien diseñado. Los poco conocidos fabricantes chinos UleFone ofrecen un nuevo smartphone básico. El dispositivo puede ser barato, pero como sugiere el nombre, el UleFone Metal ofrece un acabado de metal y buenas características técnicas.

bien (81%) Ulefone Metal Mediatek MT6753ARM Mali-T720 v5.1 - 09/23/AM
Dispositivo de pruebas cortesía de Ulefone
(download rating image as PNG or SVG)
Ulefone Metal
Procesador
Mediatek MT6753 1.3 GHz
Adaptador gráfico
Memoría
3072 MB 
pantalla
5 pulgadas 16:9, 1280x720 pixels 294 PPI, capacitive, LCD, IPS, lustroso: si
Disco duro
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 11.79 GB libre
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, Audio Conexiones: clavija headset 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD hasta 128GB, 1 Lector de Huellas Digitales, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: sensor de proximidad, acelerómetro, brújula, hall, OTG, Miracast
Equipamento de red
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0, 2G: 850/900/1,800/1,900 MHz; 3G: 900/2,100 MHz; LTE: 800/900/1,800/2,100/2,600 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 9.35 x 143 x 71
Battería
3050 mAh Litio-Ion, Sony, Duración de la Batería (según el fabricante): 320 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.0
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Características adicionales
Altavoces: Mono, Teclado: virtual, Luz de Teclado: si, adaptador modular de corriente, cable USB, UleFone UI, 12 Meses Garantía, fanless
Peso
155 g, Suministro de Electricidad: 42 g
Precio
120 Euros

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
303 MBit/s ∼100% +243%
Ulefone Metal
Mali-T720, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash (AVM Fritzbox 6490)
88.3 MBit/s ∼29%
TP-Link Neffos C5
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash (2.4 GHz)
44.9 MBit/s ∼15% -49%
Wiko Lenny 3
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
44.8 MBit/s ∼15% -49%
Archos 50e Neon
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 8 GB eMMC Flash (2.4 GHz)
42 MBit/s ∼14% -52%
UHANS S1
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
30.4 MBit/s ∼10% -66%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
290 MBit/s ∼100% +297%
Ulefone Metal
Mali-T720, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash (AVM Fritzbox 6490)
73.1 MBit/s ∼25%
UHANS S1
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
50.9 MBit/s ∼18% -30%
TP-Link Neffos C5
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash (2.4 GHz)
49.3 MBit/s ∼17% -33%
Wiko Lenny 3
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.2 MBit/s ∼17% -33%
Archos 50e Neon
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 8 GB eMMC Flash (2.4 GHz)
46 MBit/s ∼16% -37%
GPS Ulefone Metal
GPS Ulefone Metal
GPS Ulefone Metal
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500

Comparación de Imágenes

Elige una escena y navega dentro de la primera imagen. Un click cambia el nivel de zoom. Un click en la imagen aumentada abre la original en una ventana nueva. La primera imagen muestra la fotografía escalada del dispositivo de pruebas.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
338
cd/m²
317
cd/m²
301
cd/m²
333
cd/m²
312
cd/m²
295
cd/m²
337
cd/m²
310
cd/m²
293
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 338 cd/m² Médio: 315.1 cd/m² Minimum: 23.8 cd/m²
iluminación: 87 %
Brillo con batería: 312 cd/m²
Contraste: 557:1 (Negro: 0.56 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.8 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 7.1 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.77
Ulefone Metal
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Archos 50e Neon
TFT, 854x480, 5
Coolpad Porto S
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Wiko Lenny 3
IPS, 1280x720, 5
UHANS S1
IPS, 1280x720, 5
TP-Link Neffos C5
IPS, 1280x720, 5
UMI Touch
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Screen
-10%
8%
14%
-15%
20%
14%
59%
Brightness
315
430
37%
403
28%
343
9%
471
50%
491
56%
415
32%
552
75%
Brightness Distribution
87
94
8%
92
6%
85
-2%
82
-6%
89
2%
91
5%
96
10%
Black Level *
0.56
0.38
32%
0.5
11%
0.47
16%
0.92
-64%
0.58
-4%
0.54
4%
Contrast
557
1166
109%
814
46%
796
43%
571
3%
876
57%
785
41%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.8
13.9
-104%
7.9
-16%
6
12%
8.6
-26%
7
-3%
6.9
-1%
1.59
77%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.1
17.3
-144%
8.9
-25%
6.7
6%
10.6
-49%
6.1
14%
6.8
4%
2.01
72%
Gamma
2.77 87%
2.93 82%
2.46 98%
2.19 110%
2.34 103%
2.15 112%
1.99 121%
2.01 119%
CCT
7402 88%
22878 28%
8332 78%
8073 81%
9487 69%
8068 81%
8131 80%
6321 103%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
82.12
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.98

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
28 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 11 ms subida
↘ 17 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 57 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (27.4 ms).
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
250 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 19 ms subida
↘ 231 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 99 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (44.5 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 59 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 655 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 28740) Hz.

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
Ulefone Metal
27.6 MB/s ∼42%
Archos 50e Neon (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
18.87 MB/s ∼29% -32%
Wiko Lenny 3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
19.59 MB/s ∼30% -29%
UHANS S1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
20.71 MB/s ∼32% -25%
TP-Link Neffos C5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
18.89 MB/s ∼29% -32%
UMI Touch (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
21.02 MB/s ∼32% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
50.36 MB/s ∼77% +82%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
Ulefone Metal
49.6 MB/s ∼60%
Archos 50e Neon (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
35.27 MB/s ∼42% -29%
Wiko Lenny 3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
40.59 MB/s ∼49% -18%
UHANS S1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
48.15 MB/s ∼58% -3%
TP-Link Neffos C5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
39.11 MB/s ∼47% -21%
UMI Touch (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
42.92 MB/s ∼52% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
76.43 MB/s ∼92% +54%
Random Write 4KB (ordenar por valor)
Ulefone Metal
7.87 MB/s ∼11%
Archos 50e Neon
5.18 MB/s ∼7% -34%
Coolpad Porto S
13.95 MB/s ∼19% +77%
Wiko Lenny 3
6.2 MB/s ∼8% -21%
UHANS S1
12.95 MB/s ∼17% +65%
TP-Link Neffos C5
6.85 MB/s ∼9% -13%
UMI Touch
14.63 MB/s ∼20% +86%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15.79 MB/s ∼21% +101%
Random Read 4KB (ordenar por valor)
Ulefone Metal
22.18 MB/s ∼16%
Archos 50e Neon
15.29 MB/s ∼11% -31%
Coolpad Porto S
22.52 MB/s ∼16% +2%
Wiko Lenny 3
15.1 MB/s ∼11% -32%
UHANS S1
20.25 MB/s ∼15% -9%
TP-Link Neffos C5
17.16 MB/s ∼12% -23%
UMI Touch
19.88 MB/s ∼14% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
86.71 MB/s ∼63% +291%
Sequential Write 256KB (ordenar por valor)
Ulefone Metal
39.91 MB/s ∼21%
Archos 50e Neon
8.33 MB/s ∼4% -79%
Coolpad Porto S
39.99 MB/s ∼21% 0%
Wiko Lenny 3
11.6 MB/s ∼6% -71%
UHANS S1
74.4 MB/s ∼40% +86%
TP-Link Neffos C5
52.43 MB/s ∼28% +31%
UMI Touch
72.47 MB/s ∼39% +82%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
145.11 MB/s ∼77% +264%
Sequential Read 256KB (ordenar por valor)
Ulefone Metal
228.84 MB/s ∼39%
Archos 50e Neon
130.29 MB/s ∼22% -43%
Coolpad Porto S
168.23 MB/s ∼28% -26%
Wiko Lenny 3
132.5 MB/s ∼22% -42%
UHANS S1
240.77 MB/s ∼41% +5%
TP-Link Neffos C5
145.77 MB/s ∼25% -36%
UMI Touch
219.3 MB/s ∼37% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
487.34 MB/s ∼82% +113%
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Ulefone Metal
37103 Points ∼20%
Archos 50e Neon
24509 Points ∼13% -34%
Coolpad Porto S
25415 Points ∼14% -32%
Wiko Lenny 3
25237 Points ∼14% -32%
UHANS S1
39029 Points ∼21% +5%
TP-Link Neffos C5
32681 Points ∼18% -12%
UMI Touch
38617 Points ∼21% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
128749 Points ∼70% +247%
3DMark
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordenar por valor)
Ulefone Metal
1057 Points ∼41%
Wiko Lenny 3
Points ∼0% -100%
UHANS S1
993 Points ∼38% -6%
TP-Link Neffos C5
810 Points ∼31% -23%
UMI Touch
1045 Points ∼40% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2002 (min: 1539) Points ∼77% +89%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Ulefone Metal
243 Points ∼3%
Wiko Lenny 3
Points ∼0% -100%
UHANS S1
248 Points ∼3% +2%
TP-Link Neffos C5
167 Points ∼2% -31%
UMI Touch
241 Points ∼3% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3015 (min: 2895) Points ∼39% +1141%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordenar por valor)
Ulefone Metal
293 Points ∼6%
Wiko Lenny 3
Points ∼0% -100%
UHANS S1
298 Points ∼6% +2%
TP-Link Neffos C5
203 Points ∼4% -31%
UMI Touch
291 Points ∼6% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2710 (min: 2421) Points ∼56% +825%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordenar por valor)
Ulefone Metal
10371 Points ∼15%
Archos 50e Neon
7848 Points ∼12% -24%
Coolpad Porto S
7413 Points ∼11% -29%
Wiko Lenny 3
7849 Points ∼12% -24%
UHANS S1
10211 Points ∼15% -2%
TP-Link Neffos C5
9291 Points ∼14% -10%
UMI Touch
10368 Points ∼15% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
19610 Points ∼29% +89%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordenar por valor)
Ulefone Metal
6469 Points ∼1%
Archos 50e Neon
2485 Points ∼1% -62%
Coolpad Porto S
2590 Points ∼1% -60%
Wiko Lenny 3
2476 Points ∼1% -62%
UHANS S1
6705 Points ∼1% +4%
TP-Link Neffos C5
4223 Points ∼1% -35%
UMI Touch
6186 Points ∼1% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
33031 Points ∼7% +411%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordenar por valor)
Ulefone Metal
7059 Points ∼4%
Archos 50e Neon
2930 Points ∼2% -58%
Coolpad Porto S
3028 Points ∼2% -57%
Wiko Lenny 3
2920 Points ∼2% -59%
UHANS S1
7259 Points ∼4% +3%
TP-Link Neffos C5
4906 Points ∼3% -31%
UMI Touch
6795 Points ∼4% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28671 Points ∼15% +306%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Ulefone Metal
19 fps ∼2%
Archos 50e Neon
11 fps ∼1% -42%
Coolpad Porto S
8.6 fps ∼1% -55%
Wiko Lenny 3
4.4 fps ∼0% -77%
TP-Link Neffos C5
14 fps ∼1% -26%
UMI Touch
12 fps ∼1% -37%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
81 fps ∼7% +326%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Ulefone Metal
12 fps ∼3%
Archos 50e Neon
4.4 fps ∼1% -63%
Coolpad Porto S
4.8 fps ∼1% -60%
Wiko Lenny 3
8 fps ∼2% -33%
TP-Link Neffos C5
8.3 fps ∼2% -31%
UMI Touch
12 fps ∼3% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
51 fps ∼11% +325%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Ulefone Metal
2.9 fps ∼1%
Coolpad Porto S
3.6 fps ∼1% +24%
Wiko Lenny 3
fps ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5
6.1 fps ∼1% +110%
UMI Touch
4.5 fps ∼1% +55%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
38 fps ∼7% +1210%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Ulefone Metal
6.4 fps ∼3%
Coolpad Porto S
1.6 fps ∼1% -75%
Wiko Lenny 3
fps ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5
2.8 fps ∼1% -56%
UMI Touch
4.5 fps ∼2% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
27 fps ∼12% +322%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
Ulefone Metal
8.9 fps ∼3%
Wiko Lenny 3
fps ∼0% -100%
UMI Touch
2.9 fps ∼1% -67%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28 fps ∼9% +215%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
Ulefone Metal
4.5 fps ∼3%
Wiko Lenny 3
fps ∼0% -100%
UMI Touch
2.9 fps ∼2% -36%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps ∼9% +233%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor)
Ulefone Metal
4079 Points ∼50%
Archos 50e Neon
2796 Points ∼34% -31%
Coolpad Porto S
2893 Points ∼36% -29%
Wiko Lenny 3
2832 Points ∼35% -31%
UHANS S1
4191 Points ∼52% +3%
TP-Link Neffos C5
3443 Points ∼42% -16%
UMI Touch
3787 Points ∼47% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4660 Points ∼57% +14%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordenar por valor)
Ulefone Metal
10 Points ∼1%
Archos 50e Neon
525 Points ∼34% +5150%
Coolpad Porto S
599 Points ∼39% +5890%
Wiko Lenny 3
632 Points ∼41% +6220%
UHANS S1
640 Points ∼42% +6300%
TP-Link Neffos C5
638 Points ∼41% +6280%
UMI Touch
576 Points ∼37% +5660%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
994 Points ∼64% +9840%
Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Ulefone Metal
433 Points ∼5%
Archos 50e Neon
138 Points ∼2% -68%
Coolpad Porto S
173 Points ∼2% -60%
Wiko Lenny 3
138 Points ∼2% -68%
UHANS S1
431 Points ∼5% 0%
TP-Link Neffos C5
281 Points ∼3% -35%
UMI Touch
429 Points ∼5% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2203 Points ∼26% +409%
Memory (ordenar por valor)
Ulefone Metal
802 Points ∼21%
Archos 50e Neon
317 Points ∼8% -60%
Coolpad Porto S
467 Points ∼12% -42%
Wiko Lenny 3
293 Points ∼8% -63%
UHANS S1
843 Points ∼22% +5%
TP-Link Neffos C5
991 Points ∼26% +24%
UMI Touch
787 Points ∼20% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2072 Points ∼54% +158%
System (ordenar por valor)
Ulefone Metal
1691 Points ∼26%
Archos 50e Neon
990 Points ∼15% -41%
Coolpad Porto S
905 Points ∼14% -46%
Wiko Lenny 3
988 Points ∼15% -42%
UHANS S1
1281 Points ∼19% -24%
TP-Link Neffos C5
1199 Points ∼18% -29%
UMI Touch
1343 Points ∼20% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4080 Points ∼62% +141%
Overall (ordenar por valor)
Ulefone Metal
273 Points ∼8%
Archos 50e Neon
389 Points ∼12% +42%
Coolpad Porto S
458 Points ∼14% +68%
Wiko Lenny 3
399 Points ∼12% +46%
UHANS S1
807 Points ∼25% +196%
TP-Link Neffos C5
683 Points ∼21% +150%
UMI Touch
717 Points ∼22% +163%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2074 Points ∼63% +660%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Ulefone Metal (Chrome Version 52)
13397.3 ms * ∼23%
Archos 50e Neon (Chrome Version 50)
15157.3 ms * ∼25% -13%
Coolpad Porto S (Chrome Version 49)
32901.1 ms * ∼55% -146%
Wiko Lenny 3 (Chrome 51)
14862.9 ms * ∼25% -11%
UHANS S1 (Chrome Version 51)
12510.3 ms * ∼21% +7%
TP-Link Neffos C5 (Chrome Version 51)
12783.4 ms * ∼21% +5%
UMI Touch (Chrome Version 50)
13953 ms * ∼23% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Samsung Browser 4.0.01-81)
2564.1 ms * ∼4% +81%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Ulefone Metal (Chrome Version 52)
17.831 Points ∼6%
Archos 50e Neon (Chrome Version 50)
14.118 Points ∼4% -21%
Coolpad Porto S (Chrome Version 49)
14.168 Points ∼4% -21%
Wiko Lenny 3 (Chrome 51)
14.068 Points ∼4% -21%
UHANS S1 (Chrome Version 51)
18.415 Points ∼6% +3%
TP-Link Neffos C5 (Chrome Version 51)
18.209 Points ∼6% +2%
UMI Touch (Chrome Version 50)
17.614 Points ∼6% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Samsung Browser 4.0.01-81)
75.12 Points ∼24% +321%
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Ulefone Metal (Chrome Version 52)
2738 Points ∼6%
Archos 50e Neon (Chrome Version 50)
2103 Points ∼5% -23%
Coolpad Porto S (Chrome Version 49)
2088 Points ∼5% -24%
Wiko Lenny 3 (Chrome 51)
2133 Points ∼5% -22%
UHANS S1 (Chrome Version 51)
2972 Points ∼7% +9%
TP-Link Neffos C5 (Chrome Version 51)
2738 Points ∼6% 0%
UMI Touch (Chrome Version 50)
2562 Points ∼6% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Samsung Browser 4.0.01-81)
13191 Points ∼29% +382%

Leyenda

 
Ulefone Metal Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Archos 50e Neon Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Coolpad Porto S Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Wiko Lenny 3 Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
UHANS S1 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
TP-Link Neffos C5 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
UMI Touch Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.
 40.7 °C37.4 °C38.6 °C 
 39.8 °C37.4 °C39.7 °C 
 38.6 °C37.1 °C37.9 °C 
Máximo: 40.7 °C
Médio: 38.6 °C
36.7 °C37.1 °C37.3 °C
36.8 °C37.4 °C37.5 °C
36.6 °C37.4 °C37.4 °C
Máximo: 37.5 °C
Médio: 37.1 °C
Conector de corriente  44.5 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2020.622.921.920.62520.721.720.320.73122.32123.622.34022.626.934.422.65021.222.321.921.26317.820.318.917.88017.918.118.617.910022.522.823.922.512534.733.236.134.716016.72617.216.720016.433.215.816.425019.438.919.119.431522.345.519.122.340027.552.717.927.550033.658.319.133.663039.163.216.139.180043.466.515.543.4100042.764.716.442.7125039.26213.739.2160036.8601336.8200034.857.913.934.8250034.558.911.434.5315037.861.110.737.8400039.16310.339.1500041.464.29.841.4630042.7689.442.7800048.271.69.548.21000040.764.99.440.71250030.755.79.630.71600026.850.39.426.8SPL52.876.426.652.8N8.337.30.98.3median 34.8Ulefone Metalmedian 58.9median 13.9median 34.8Delta6.79.24.16.737.432.437.432.831.332.828.331.728.343.52643.541.939.441.931.736.231.727.728.627.727.625.427.623.221.323.225.823.325.824.322.524.326.122.426.13521.3354518.44556.417.556.463.117.563.171.917.271.974.616.874.676.117.376.174.517.474.57616.67674.217.374.270.817.670.872.417.672.472.617.772.674.717.474.775.317.775.373.817.973.865.818.165.850.418.150.485.529.885.560.71.360.7median 70.8Archos 50e Neonmedian 17.7median 70.816.51.616.5383832.43837.530.731.337.531.133.431.731.131.530.62631.537.238.439.437.232.236.236.232.226.529.328.626.526.225.125.426.225.626.321.325.623.530.623.323.520.926.322.520.924.523.922.424.532.321.121.332.34322.618.44356.528.217.556.56336.317.56369.443.517.269.471.44516.871.468.942.817.368.970.642.817.470.670.642.116.670.674.446.417.374.477.450.217.677.476.548.817.676.575.147.417.775.171.944.717.471.969.542.517.769.563.23517.963.255.525.818.155.548.121.718.148.184.857.429.884.855.310.41.355.3median 63.2UHANS S1median 36.3median 17.7median 63.215.49.71.615.435.945.932.435.935.635.831.335.629.329.131.729.328.926.52628.939.938.939.439.929.73536.229.728.126.928.628.123.82725.423.825.926.621.325.928.72423.328.731.923.522.531.940.821.522.440.849.428.921.349.454.13418.454.161.443.217.561.469.149.717.569.173.85417.273.876.958.516.876.974.157.417.374.171.352.317.471.370.95116.670.970.550.317.370.574.955.317.674.973.253.317.673.271.952.317.771.974.154.117.474.174.654.517.774.671.251.817.971.262.443.118.162.452.933.418.152.984.965.829.884.961.318.91.361.3median 70.5Coolpad Porto Smedian 50.3median 17.7median 70.513.2111.613.2hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Ulefone Metal audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Archos 50e Neon audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.51 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 43.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 8.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

UHANS S1 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 37.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (36% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Coolpad Porto S audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.92 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 37.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.68 / 0.69 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.41 / 2.46 / 2.83 Watt
Carga midlight 5.15 / 7.05 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Ulefone Metal
3050 mAh
Archos 50e Neon
2200 mAh
Coolpad Porto S
2000 mAh
Wiko Lenny 3
2000 mAh
UHANS S1
2200 mAh
TP-Link Neffos C5
2200 mAh
UMI Touch
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3600 mAh
Power Consumption
31%
26%
22%
40%
19%
25%
29%
Idle Minimum *
1.41
0.56
60%
1.16
18%
0.76
46%
0.7
50%
0.72
49%
0.89
37%
0.63
55%
Idle Average *
2.46
1.58
36%
2.21
10%
2.16
12%
1.13
54%
1.87
24%
2
19%
1.1
55%
Idle Maximum *
2.83
1.8
36%
2.24
21%
2.35
17%
1.25
56%
2
29%
2.1
26%
1.56
45%
Load Average *
5.15
5.22
-1%
3.34
35%
4.65
10%
4.39
15%
5.99
-16%
3.87
25%
5.95
-16%
Load Maximum *
7.05
5.34
24%
3.95
44%
5.35
24%
5.43
23%
6.45
9%
5.79
18%
6.7
5%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Navegando con WLAN v1.3
6h 43min
Ulefone Metal
3050 mAh
Archos 50e Neon
2200 mAh
Coolpad Porto S
2000 mAh
Wiko Lenny 3
2000 mAh
UHANS S1
2200 mAh
TP-Link Neffos C5
2200 mAh
UMI Touch
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3600 mAh
Duración de Batería
24%
25%
36%
-23%
12%
37%
82%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
403
498
24%
504
25%
549
36%
309
-23%
453
12%
553
37%
732
82%

Pro

+ carcasa de metal
+ lector de huellas
+ panel IPS
+ 3 GB de RAM
+ potencial de rendimiento (básico)
+ memoria eMMC relativamente rápida

Contra

- elevado consumo de energía / aguante de batería mediocre
- brillo
- contraste
- teclas de navegación sin iluminación
UleFone Metal. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de UleFone.

UleFone ha creado un dispositivo barato pero exitoso. El éxito del modelo de pruebas se puede deber a su precio y sus características técnicas. La manufactura y el rendimiento de sistema también son bastan te buenos para un dispositivo básico. 

El mayor defecto del UleFone Metal es la calidad del panel LCD. Este panel IPS es demasiado oscuro y ofrece poco contraste comparado con la competencia. Lo que es más, el consumo de energía es demasiado alto para un dispositivo de 5", lo que resulta en un aguante de batería modesto.

A pesar de las faltas en display y aguante de batería, el UleFone Metal es un dispositivo básico interesante que merece la inversión de unos 100 Euros. 

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Ulefone Metal - 09/23/AM v5.1
Marcus Herbrich

Acabado
84%
Teclado
60 / 75 → 80%
Ratón
86%
Conectividad
40 / 60 → 67%
Peso
92%
Battería
89%
Pantalla
80%
Rendimiento de juegos
19 / 63 → 30%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
32 / 70 → 45%
Temperatura
88%
Ruido
100%
Audio
56 / 91 → 62%
Cámara
65%
Médio
69%
81%
Smartphone - media ponderada

Pricecompare

> Notebookcheck Español > Análisis > Breve análisis del Smartphone UleFone Metal
Marcus Herbrich, 2016-09-29 (Update: 2016-09-29)