Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del Smartphone Vernee Mars

Marcus Herbrich (traducido por Francisco García), 11/27/PM

Sin borde. El asequible gama media Mars de los chinos Vernee tiene un diseño casi sin bordes además de una buenísima configuración para su precio. Según los fabricantes, los bordes laterales miden 1mm de grosor. Descubre en el informe cómo lo hace el smartphone comparado con la fuerte competencia.

bien (83%) Vernee Mars Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755ARM Mali-T860 MP2 v5.1 - 11/18/AM
Dispositivo de pruebas cortesía de Vernee
(download rating image as PNG or SVG)
Vernee Mars
Procesador
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 2 GHz
Adaptador gráfico
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Memoría
4096 MB 
pantalla
5.5 pulgadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixels 401 PPI, multitáctil, capacitiva, LCD, IPS, 2.5D Arc Screen, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, lustroso: si
Disco duro
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 25.1 GB libre
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, Audio Conexiones: clavija headset 3.5mm, Card Reader: micro-SD card (max. 128 GB), 1 Lector de Huellas Digitales, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: proximidad, acelerómetro, brújula, giroscopio, OTG, Miracast, USB Type-C, App2SD, LED de estado
Equipamento de red
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0, 2G: GSM 850/900/1800MHz 3G: WCDMA 900/2100MHz 4G: FDD-LTE 800/1800/2100/2600MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 7.6 x 151 x 73
Battería
3000 mAh Litio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Características adicionales
Altavoces: mono, Teclado: virtual, Luz de Teclado: si, adaptador modular de corriente, cable USB, soporte de madera, Vernee UI, 12 Meses Garantía, SAR desconocido, fanless
Peso
162 g, Suministro de Electricidad: 45 g
Precio
190 Euros

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Vernee Mars
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
81.1 MBit/s ∼100%
Honor 5C
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.8 MBit/s ∼61% -39%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash (2.4 GHz)
47.6 MBit/s ∼59% -41%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash (AVM Fritzbox 6490 Cable)
45.6 MBit/s ∼56% -44%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Honor 5C
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
58.3 MBit/s ∼100% +50%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash (2.4 GHz)
50 MBit/s ∼86% +29%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash (AVM Fritzbox 6490 Cable)
46.7 MBit/s ∼80% +20%
Vernee Mars
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
38.9 MBit/s ∼67%
GPS test Vernee Mars
GPS test Vernee Mars
GPS test Vernee Mars
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
13 MP camera, HDR mode
13 MP camera
13 MP camera, HDR mode

Comparación de Imágenes

Elige una escena y navega dentro de la primera imagen. Un click cambia el nivel de zoom. Un click en la imagen aumentada abre la original en una ventana nueva. La primera imagen muestra la fotografía escalada del dispositivo de pruebas.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
313
cd/m²
339
cd/m²
356
cd/m²
321
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
367
cd/m²
321
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 367 cd/m² Médio: 338.9 cd/m² Minimum: 14.8 cd/m²
iluminación: 85 %
Brillo con batería: 345 cd/m²
Contraste: 2464:1 (Negro: 0.14 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.1 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 6.7 | - Ø
99.3% sRGB (Calman)
Gamma: 2.47
Vernee Mars
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
IPS, 1280x720, 5
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
IPS, 1280x720, 5
UMI Max
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Honor 5C
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Coolpad Modena 2
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Huawei Mate 9
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.9
Screen
-35%
-16%
-10%
-41%
-64%
-35%
-9%
Brightness
339
414
22%
302
-11%
498
47%
498
47%
468
38%
420
24%
680
101%
Brightness Distribution
85
94
11%
79
-7%
86
1%
93
9%
86
1%
94
11%
93
9%
Black Level *
0.14
0.42
-200%
0.15
-7%
0.23
-64%
0.49
-250%
0.63
-350%
0.33
-136%
0.42
-200%
Contrast
2464
981
-60%
2080
-16%
2270
-8%
1051
-57%
765
-69%
1255
-49%
1657
-33%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
7.1
5.6
21%
8.2
-15%
6.9
3%
6.2
13%
6.5
8%
8.1
-14%
4.3
39%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.7
6.9
-3%
9.2
-37%
9.2
-37%
7.4
-10%
7.3
-9%
9.6
-43%
4.8
28%
Gamma
2.47 97%
2.4 100%
2.29 105%
2.38 101%
2.28 105%
1.91 126%
2 120%
2.33 103%
CCT
7711 84%
8422 77%
9017 72%
8687 75%
8664 75%
7249 90%
7754 84%
7255 90%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
40 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 14 ms subida
↘ 26 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 94 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (27.3 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
62 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 21 ms subida
↘ 41 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 276 (máximo) ms. » 94 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (43 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 59 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 655 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 28740) Hz.

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
Vernee Mars
24 MB/s ∼37%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
51.1 MB/s ∼78% +113%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
12.62 MB/s ∼19% -47%
UMI Max (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
18.07 MB/s ∼28% -25%
Honor 5C (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
24.21 MB/s ∼37% +1%
Coolpad Modena 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
18.25 MB/s ∼28% -24%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
16.17 MB/s ∼25% -33%
Huawei Mate 9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
29.53 MB/s ∼45% +23%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
Vernee Mars
44.5 MB/s ∼53%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
65.5 MB/s ∼79% +47%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
22.77 MB/s ∼27% -49%
UMI Max (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
36.64 MB/s ∼44% -18%
Honor 5C (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
51.93 MB/s ∼62% +17%
Coolpad Modena 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
35.59 MB/s ∼43% -20%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
27.68 MB/s ∼33% -38%
Huawei Mate 9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
53.97 MB/s ∼65% +21%
Random Write 4KB (ordenar por valor)
Vernee Mars
15.77 MB/s ∼21%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
28.31 MB/s ∼38% +80%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
8.26 MB/s ∼11% -48%
UMI Max
10.91 MB/s ∼15% -31%
Honor 5C
15.7 MB/s ∼21% 0%
Coolpad Modena 2
6.79 MB/s ∼9% -57%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
7.95 MB/s ∼11% -50%
Huawei Mate 9
8.77 MB/s ∼12% -44%
Random Read 4KB (ordenar por valor)
Vernee Mars
21.66 MB/s ∼16%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
17.9 MB/s ∼13% -17%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
18.24 MB/s ∼13% -16%
UMI Max
26.66 MB/s ∼19% +23%
Honor 5C
61.7 MB/s ∼45% +185%
Coolpad Modena 2
23.03 MB/s ∼17% +6%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
20.25 MB/s ∼15% -7%
Huawei Mate 9
94.69 MB/s ∼69% +337%
Sequential Write 256KB (ordenar por valor)
Vernee Mars
71.58 MB/s ∼38%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
43.95 MB/s ∼23% -39%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
70.33 MB/s ∼37% -2%
UMI Max
69.5 MB/s ∼37% -3%
Honor 5C
75.5 MB/s ∼40% +5%
Coolpad Modena 2
42.56 MB/s ∼23% -41%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
39.51 MB/s ∼21% -45%
Huawei Mate 9
142.92 MB/s ∼76% +100%
Sequential Read 256KB (ordenar por valor)
Vernee Mars
255.87 MB/s ∼43%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
144.12 MB/s ∼24% -44%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
187.34 MB/s ∼32% -27%
UMI Max
257.9 MB/s ∼43% +1%
Honor 5C
263 MB/s ∼44% +3%
Coolpad Modena 2
147.04 MB/s ∼25% -43%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
178.65 MB/s ∼30% -30%
Huawei Mate 9
594.23 MB/s ∼100% +132%
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Vernee Mars
51008 Points ∼28%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
28399 Points ∼15% -44%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
23822 Points ∼13% -53%
UMI Max
49057 Points ∼27% -4%
Honor 5C
53143 Points ∼29% +4%
Coolpad Modena 2
24875 Points ∼13% -51%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
30676 Points ∼17% -40%
Huawei Mate 9
124087 Points ∼67% +143%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1147 Points ∼4%
Honor 5C
3914 Points ∼13%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
404 Points ∼8%
Honor 5C
906 Points ∼19%
Geekbench 4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Vernee Mars
2903 Points ∼14%
UMI Max
2701 Points ∼13% -7%
Coolpad Modena 2
1274 Points ∼6% -56%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
1588 Points ∼7% -45%
Huawei Mate 9
5629 Points ∼27% +94%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Vernee Mars
729 Points ∼14%
UMI Max
734 Points ∼14% +1%
Coolpad Modena 2
459 Points ∼9% -37%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
572 Points ∼11% -22%
Huawei Mate 9
1947 Points ∼38% +167%
3DMark
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordenar por valor)
Vernee Mars
1100 Points ∼43%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
716 Points ∼28% -35%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
618 Points ∼24% -44%
UMI Max
1239 Points ∼48% +13%
Honor 5C
1418 Points ∼55% +29%
Coolpad Modena 2
621 Points ∼24% -44%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
831 Points ∼32% -24%
Huawei Mate 9
2123 Points ∼82% +93%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Vernee Mars
523 Points ∼7%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
42 Points ∼1% -92%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
101 Points ∼1% -81%
UMI Max
521 Points ∼7% 0%
Honor 5C
480 Points ∼6% -8%
Coolpad Modena 2
106 Points ∼1% -80%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
172 Points ∼2% -67%
Huawei Mate 9
2448 Points ∼32% +368%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordenar por valor)
Vernee Mars
602 Points ∼12%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
53 Points ∼1% -91%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
124 Points ∼3% -79%
UMI Max
598 Points ∼12% -1%
Honor 5C
563 Points ∼12% -6%
Coolpad Modena 2
130 Points ∼3% -78%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
209 Points ∼4% -65%
Huawei Mate 9
2367 Points ∼49% +293%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordenar por valor)
Vernee Mars
10762 Points ∼16%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
9256 Points ∼14% -14%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
7026 Points ∼10% -35%
UMI Max
12239 Points ∼18% +14%
Honor 5C
13588 Points ∼20% +26%
Coolpad Modena 2
7061 Points ∼10% -34%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
9768 Points ∼14% -9%
Huawei Mate 9
15104 Points ∼22% +40%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordenar por valor)
Vernee Mars
10685 Points ∼2%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
3858 Points ∼1% -64%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2645 Points ∼1% -75%
UMI Max
10612 Points ∼2% -1%
Honor 5C
11319 Points ∼3% +6%
Coolpad Modena 2
2789 Points ∼1% -74%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
4333 Points ∼1% -59%
Huawei Mate 9
35626 Points ∼8% +233%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordenar por valor)
Vernee Mars
10702 Points ∼6%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4432 Points ∼2% -59%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
3070 Points ∼2% -71%
UMI Max
10942 Points ∼6% +2%
Honor 5C
11755 Points ∼6% +10%
Coolpad Modena 2
3222 Points ∼2% -70%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
4944 Points ∼3% -54%
Huawei Mate 9
27364 Points ∼14% +156%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Vernee Mars
17 fps ∼2%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
5.2 fps ∼0% -69%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
4.9 fps ∼0% -71%
UMI Max
17 fps ∼2% 0%
Honor 5C
19 fps ∼2% +12%
Coolpad Modena 2
5 fps ∼0% -71%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
14 fps ∼1% -18%
Huawei Mate 9
80 fps ∼7% +371%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Vernee Mars
18 fps ∼4%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
9.6 fps ∼2% -47%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
8.2 fps ∼2% -54%
UMI Max
17 fps ∼4% -6%
Honor 5C
20 fps ∼4% +11%
Coolpad Modena 2
8.9 fps ∼2% -51%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
8.4 fps ∼2% -53%
Huawei Mate 9
60 fps ∼13% +233%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Vernee Mars
7.1 fps ∼1%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
1.8 fps ∼0% -75%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
3.4 fps ∼1% -52%
UMI Max
7.1 fps ∼1% 0%
Honor 5C
7.9 fps ∼1% +11%
Coolpad Modena 2
1.8 fps ∼0% -75%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
6 fps ∼1% -15%
Huawei Mate 9
34 fps ∼6% +379%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Vernee Mars
7.6 fps ∼3%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4.1 fps ∼2% -46%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1.8 fps ∼1% -76%
UMI Max
7.1 fps ∼3% -7%
Honor 5C
8.4 fps ∼4% +11%
Coolpad Modena 2
4 fps ∼2% -47%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
3 fps ∼1% -61%
Huawei Mate 9
37 fps ∼16% +387%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
Vernee Mars
4.8 fps ∼2%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2.5 fps ∼1% -48%
UMI Max
4.7 fps ∼2% -2%
Honor 5C
4.5 fps ∼2% -6%
Coolpad Modena 2
2.9 fps ∼1% -40%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
4.4 fps ∼1% -8%
Huawei Mate 9
24 fps ∼8% +400%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
Vernee Mars
5.1 fps ∼3%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1.2 fps ∼1% -76%
UMI Max
4.7 fps ∼3% -8%
Honor 5C
4.9 fps ∼3% -4%
Coolpad Modena 2
1.2 fps ∼1% -76%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
1.9 fps ∼1% -63%
Huawei Mate 9
28 fps ∼16% +449%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
Vernee Mars
2.5 fps ∼1%
UMI Max
2.5 fps ∼1% 0%
Honor 5C
2.9 fps ∼1% +16%
Huawei Mate 9
fps ∼0% -100%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
Vernee Mars
2.7 fps ∼2%
UMI Max
2.5 fps ∼2% -7%
Honor 5C
2.8 fps ∼2% +4%
Huawei Mate 9
14 fps ∼12% +419%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor)
Vernee Mars
4554 Points ∼56%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4283 Points ∼53% -6%
UMI Max
4485 Points ∼55% -2%
Honor 5C
5120 Points ∼63% +12%
Coolpad Modena 2
3119 Points ∼38% -32%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
3813 Points ∼47% -16%
Huawei Mate 9
7403 Points ∼91% +63%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordenar por valor)
Vernee Mars
10 Points ∼1%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
551 Points ∼36% +5410%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
592 Points ∼38% +5820%
UMI Max
10 Points ∼1% 0%
Honor 5C
707 Points ∼46% +6970%
Coolpad Modena 2
565 Points ∼37% +5550%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
10 Points ∼1% 0%
Huawei Mate 9
1076 Points ∼70% +10660%
Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Vernee Mars
665 Points ∼8%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
313 Points ∼4% -53%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
174 Points ∼2% -74%
UMI Max
666 Points ∼8% 0%
Honor 5C
814 Points ∼9% +22%
Coolpad Modena 2
178 Points ∼2% -73%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
286 Points ∼3% -57%
Huawei Mate 9
3939 Points ∼46% +492%
Memory (ordenar por valor)
Vernee Mars
1005 Points ∼26%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
741 Points ∼19% -26%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
487 Points ∼13% -52%
UMI Max
998 Points ∼26% -1%
Honor 5C
1504 Points ∼39% +50%
Coolpad Modena 2
598 Points ∼16% -40%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
450 Points ∼12% -55%
Huawei Mate 9
3850 Points ∼100% +283%
System (ordenar por valor)
Vernee Mars
2291 Points ∼35%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
1035 Points ∼16% -55%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
801 Points ∼12% -65%
UMI Max
2123 Points ∼32% -7%
Honor 5C
2600 Points ∼40% +13%
Coolpad Modena 2
909 Points ∼14% -60%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
1090 Points ∼17% -52%
Huawei Mate 9
3616 Points ∼55% +58%
Overall (ordenar por valor)
Vernee Mars
348 Points ∼11%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
603 Points ∼18% +73%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
448 Points ∼14% +29%
UMI Max
341 Points ∼10% -2%
Honor 5C
1225 Points ∼37% +252%
Coolpad Modena 2
483 Points ∼15% +39%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
192 Points ∼6% -45%
Huawei Mate 9
2772 Points ∼84% +697%
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Vernee Mars (Chrome Version 54)
4073 Points ∼9%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play (Chrome 50.0.2661.89)
2773 Points ∼6% -32%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite (Chrome Version 50)
1910 Points ∼4% -53%
UMI Max (Chrome Version 54)
4231 Points ∼9% +4%
Honor 5C (Chrome 51)
4188 Points ∼9% +3%
Coolpad Modena 2 (Chrome Version 54)
1975 Points ∼4% -52%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus (die Abstrahlung von blauem Licht)
2697 Points ∼6% -34%
Huawei Mate 9 (Chrome 54)
11897 Points ∼26% +192%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Vernee Mars (Chrome Version 54)
9376.1 ms * ∼16%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play (Chrome 50.0.2661.89)
12952.9 ms * ∼22% -38%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite (Chrome Version 50)
19234.4 ms * ∼32% -105%
UMI Max (Chrome Version 54)
9795.6 ms * ∼16% -4%
Honor 5C (Chrome 51)
9111.2 ms * ∼15% +3%
Coolpad Modena 2 (Chrome Version 54)
19647.2 ms * ∼33% -110%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus (die Abstrahlung von blauem Licht)
12910 ms * ∼22% -38%
Huawei Mate 9 (Chrome 54)
2733.7 ms * ∼5% +71%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Vernee Mars (Chrome Version 54)
27.099 Points ∼8%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play (Chrome 50.0.2661.89)
17.094 Points ∼5% -37%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite (Chrome Version 50)
12.729 Points ∼4% -53%
UMI Max (Chrome Version 54)
25.502 Points ∼8% -6%
Honor 5C (Chrome 51)
27.934 Points ∼9% +3%
Coolpad Modena 2 (Chrome Version 54)
13.15 Points ∼4% -51%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus (Chrome Version 52)
18.028 Points ∼6% -33%
Huawei Mate 9 (Chrome 54)
68.6 Points ∼21% +153%

Leyenda

 
Vernee Mars Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto G4 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V7 Lite Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
UMI Max Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 5C HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Coolpad Modena 2 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Acer Liquid Zest Plus Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Mate 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.
 34.7 °C32 °C34.5 °C 
 35.7 °C32.9 °C37.2 °C 
 34.1 °C32.7 °C35.6 °C 
Máximo: 37.2 °C
Médio: 34.4 °C
34.5 °C34.8 °C35.5 °C
34.5 °C35.5 °C36.3 °C
33.6 °C35.2 °C36.3 °C
Máximo: 36.3 °C
Médio: 35.1 °C
Conector de corriente  38.3 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2024.42924.42525.328.325.33125.826.125.84029.732.729.75029.531.529.56324.525.224.5802523.12510026.523.226.512536.631.436.616022.819.422.820024.320.424.325028.520.928.531536.923.636.940044.323.844.350050.920.850.963057.516.857.580063.517.563.5100069.219.769.2125069.118.969.1160068.516.368.5200067.916.167.9250069.414.769.4315071.615.371.6400075.114.975.1500070.614.270.6630064.213.764.2800060.913.660.91000058.713.658.71250058.313.958.3160004613.646SPL81.229.381.2N43.81.243.8median 58.7Vernee Marsmedian 16.8median 58.7Delta15.13.115.136.331.432.436.334.429.331.334.431.632.231.731.635.134.12635.138.134.939.438.13132.536.23126.427.228.626.427.527.725.427.527.531.121.327.526.827.523.326.830.627.122.530.638.429.922.438.446.432.921.346.45240.318.45260.847.817.560.865.85517.565.870.661.817.270.67463.816.87473.96317.373.968.957.917.468.968.857.416.668.868.857.717.368.868.65717.668.668.255.217.668.268.453.817.768.469.85517.469.874.359.417.774.375.160.417.975.169.954.818.169.966.35118.166.382.670.729.882.653.425.61.353.4median 68.4ZTE Blade V7 Litemedian 55median 17.7median 68.410.98.91.610.932.537.232.432.532.733.631.332.723.531.231.723.530.833.52630.841.139.139.441.132.933.436.232.928.930.728.628.926.425.825.426.427.324.821.327.328.325.823.328.332.62422.532.638.624.722.438.646.432.421.346.454.537.518.454.55942.917.55959.549.517.559.562.750.117.262.766.952.516.866.971.155.517.371.175.358.217.475.379.162.916.679.180.463.817.380.479.162.217.679.177.660.117.677.675.357.417.775.374.657.417.474.674.356.517.774.372.354.517.972.364.145.818.164.146.227.918.146.287.971.229.887.964.123.81.364.1median 64.1Honor 5Cmedian 50.1median 17.7median 64.114.612.21.614.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Vernee Mars audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 43%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

ZTE Blade V7 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.62 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 43%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Honor 5C audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 43%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.14 / 0.31 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.02 / 1.69 / 1.82 Watt
Carga midlight 4.39 / 6.79 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Vernee Mars
3000 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2800 mAh
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2500 mAh
UMI Max
4000 mAh
Honor 5C
3000 mAh
Coolpad Modena 2
2500 mAh
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
5000 mAh
Power Consumption
23%
30%
22%
4%
3%
7%
Idle Minimum *
1.02
0.68
33%
0.63
38%
1.02
-0%
0.89
13%
0.64
37%
0.83
19%
Idle Average *
1.69
1.58
7%
1.37
19%
1.53
9%
2.07
-22%
1.96
-16%
2.06
-22%
Idle Maximum *
1.82
1.61
12%
1.71
6%
1.62
11%
2.15
-18%
1.98
-9%
2.08
-14%
Load Average *
4.39
3.36
23%
2.82
36%
2.91
34%
3.46
21%
4.99
-14%
3.53
20%
Load Maximum *
6.79
3.91
42%
3.36
51%
2.93
57%
5.18
24%
5.48
19%
4.49
34%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Navegando con WLAN v1.3
7h 07min
Vernee Mars
3000 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2800 mAh
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2500 mAh
UMI Max
4000 mAh
Honor 5C
3000 mAh
Coolpad Modena 2
2500 mAh
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
5000 mAh
Duración de Batería
48%
21%
38%
37%
21%
91%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
427
630
48%
517
21%
588
38%
584
37%
518
21%
815
91%

Pro

+ pantalla IPS de alto contraste
+ decente rendimiento de sistema
+ 1080p
+ calidad y sensación de la carcasa
+ Wi-Fi dual-band
+ USB Type-C
+ veloz almacenamiento eMMC (para su precio)

Contra

- módulo de cámara optimizable
- aguante de batería y brillo de pantalla mejorables
- GPS
- altavoz
Vernee Mars. Modelo de prueba cortesía de Vernee.

El Vernee Mars es un smartphone atractivo y muy bien construido. Con un PVP actual de entre 180 y 190 Euros (importación), el asequible gama media ofrece una relación precio-rendimiento atractiva y puntúa con un panel IPS de alta resolución y mucho contraste, un rendimiento de sistema decente, y una configuración exhuberante.

A cambio hay que hacer sacrificios en la calidad del altavoz (respecto a modelos rivales) y el rendimiento del GPS. Lo que es más, resulta relativamente difícil sacar buenas fotos con la cámara principal de 13MP - un estabilizador de imagen óptico habría sido una ventaja genial aquí.

El Vernee Mars es un buen smartphone en el segmento medio de precios, pero le falta un gancho de venta único - el Honor 5C con un perfil de dispositivo muy similar, por ejemplo, se puede comprar al mismo precio en Alemania. Esto ya hace dudar sobre si merece la pena importar.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Vernee Mars - 11/18/AM v5.1
Marcus Herbrich

Acabado
88%
Teclado
63 / 75 → 84%
Ratón
91%
Conectividad
47 / 60 → 78%
Peso
91%
Battería
89%
Pantalla
83%
Rendimiento de juegos
25 / 63 → 40%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
41 / 70 → 58%
Temperatura
91%
Ruido
100%
Audio
59 / 91 → 65%
Cámara
66%
Médio
72%
83%
Smartphone - media ponderada

Pricecompare

> Español - Home > Análisis > Breve análisis del Smartphone Vernee Mars
Marcus Herbrich, 2016-11-27 (Update: 2016-11-27)