Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del portátil Asus GL702VM-GC102D

Sascha Mölck (traducido por Fernando Alvarez Ude), 12/10/PM

Delgado portátil para juegos. Asus empaqueta mucha potencia para juegos dentro de un delgado portátil de 17.3 pulgadas. Aún así, el portátil no produce mucho ruido o calor. Debido a que la GPU integrada está desactivada, el portátil consume mucha potencia en reposo.

Asus GL702VM-GC102D (GL702 Serie)
Procesador
Adaptador gráfico
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) - 6144 MB, Núcleo: 1405-1886 MHz, Memoría: 2002 MHz, GDDR5, 192-bit, ForceWare 375.95
Memoría
8192 MB 
, DDR4-2132, Single-Channel, dos ranuras de RAM (una ocupada)
pantalla
17.3 pulgadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixels 127 PPI, LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3, IPS, Nvidia G-Sync, lustroso: no
Placa base
Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)
Disco duro
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, 1000 GB 
, 7200 rpm, 930 GB libre
Tarjeta de sonido
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexiones
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Conexiones: Combo audio jack, Card Reader: SD, TPM 2.0
Equipamento de red
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.0
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 24 x 415 x 280
Battería
76 Wh Litio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
FreeDos
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionales
Altavoces: Stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, Luz de Teclado: si, DVD con controladores, ratón USB, 24 Meses Garantía
Peso
2.7 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 688 g
Precio
1399 Euro

 

Size Comparison

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Schenker Technologies XMG P507
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
77 MB/s ∼100% +6%
Gigabyte P57X v6
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76.4 MB/s ∼99% +5%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s ∼99% +5%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
72.6 MB/s ∼94%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23.8 MB/s ∼31% -67%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte P57X v6
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89.9 MB/s ∼100% +6%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼97% +3%
Schenker Technologies XMG P507
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86 MB/s ∼96% +2%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
84.6 MB/s ∼94%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.6 MB/s ∼31% -67%
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
676 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Wireless-AC 7265 (RTL GBE)
665 MBit/s ∼98%
Schenker Technologies XMG P507
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
642 MBit/s ∼95% -3%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
512.058 MBit/s ∼76% -23%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Wireless-AC 7265 (RTL GBE)
538 MBit/s ∼100%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
536.301 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
529 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Schenker Technologies XMG P507
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
456 MBit/s ∼85% -15%
318
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
314
cd/m²
317
cd/m²
326
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
303
cd/m²
303
cd/m²
296
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 326 cd/m² Médio: 311.9 cd/m² Minimum: 36 cd/m²
iluminación: 91 %
Brillo con batería: 326 cd/m²
Contraste: 652:1 (Negro: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.3 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 7.37 | - Ø
83% sRGB (Argyll) 55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.37
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
HP Omen 17-w110ng
IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Gigabyte P57X v6
IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
MSI GS73VR 6RF
TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3
Schenker Technologies XMG P507
IPS, 60 Hz, 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
-1%
1%
42%
3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
38
37
3%
33.6
12%
28
26%
36
5%
Response Time Black / White *
23
24
-4%
25.6
-11%
9.6
58%
23
-0%
PWM Frequency
Screen
26%
21%
34%
17%
Brightness
312
342
10%
321
3%
315
1%
292
-6%
Brightness Distribution
91
87
-4%
93
2%
86
-5%
87
-4%
Black Level *
0.5
0.31
38%
0.267
47%
0.308
38%
0.3
40%
Contrast
652
1168
79%
1233
89%
1095
68%
960
47%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.3
4.5
29%
5.93
6%
2.96
53%
5.1
19%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.37
3.48
53%
6.72
9%
2.57
65%
4.43
40%
Gamma
2.37 101%
2.23 108%
2.12 113%
2.25 107%
2.46 98%
CCT
7116 91%
6144 106%
7611 85%
7114 91%
6687 97%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
55
55
0%
57
4%
74.3
35%
55
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
83
84
1%
87
5%
100
20%
83
0%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
13% / 21%
11% / 17%
38% / 36%
10% / 14%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 59 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 457 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 10420) Hz.

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
23 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 5 ms subida
↘ 18 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 20 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (27.4 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
38 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 12 ms subida
↘ 26 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 276 (máximo) ms. » 33 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (43.1 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
LatencyMon
The processor is soldered in.
The processor is soldered in.
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5126
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
20111
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
8238
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.5 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.47 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
61 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
134 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
678 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
74.03 fps
ayuda
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker Technologies XMG P507
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points ∼78% +10%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points ∼78% +10%
MSI GP72-2QEi781
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
142 Points ∼75% +6%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
140 Points ∼74% +4%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
134 Points ∼71% 0%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
134 Points ∼71%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GP72-2QEi781
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
694 Points ∼42% +2%
Schenker Technologies XMG P507
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
682 Points ∼41% +1%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
679 Points ∼41% 0%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
678 Points ∼41%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
671 Points ∼40% -1%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
635 Points ∼38% -6%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5484 Points ∼75% +7%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5126 Points ∼70%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4926 Points ∼67% -4%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20283 Points ∼58% +1%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20111 Points ∼58%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20090 Points ∼58% 0%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
11903 Points ∼44%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
2926 Points ∼63%
Geekbench 4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
11033 Points ∼52%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
3663 Points ∼72%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ (EDGE: 38.14393.0.0)
269.16 Points ∼84% +16%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
251.96 Points ∼79% +8%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ (Edge 38)
232.36 Points ∼73%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
230.83 Points ∼72% -1%
PCMark 7 Score
4114 puntos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4670 puntos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
6361 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4809 puntos
ayuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
5394 Points ∼83% +12%
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
5014 Points ∼77% +4%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4809 Points ∼74%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4774 Points ∼73% -1%
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
4833 Points ∼85% +3%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4670 Points ∼82%
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
4206 Points ∼74% -10%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4012 Points ∼71% -14%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
Tasa de Transferencia Mínima: 52.7 MB/s
Tasa de Transferencia Máxima: 137.9 MB/s
Tasa de Transferencia Promedio: 104.7 MB/s
Tiempo de Acceso: 17.4 ms
Velocidad de Ráfagas: 92.8 MB/s
Uso de CPU: 2.6 %
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
MSI CX72-7QLi581
WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
Gigabyte P57X v6
Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
MSI GS73VR 6RF
SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-20%
12720%
7576%
5569%
Write 4k QD32
1.186
1.064
-10%
295.3
24799%
274.9
23079%
167.1
13989%
Read 4k QD32
1.106
0.918
-17%
600.2
54168%
273.9
24665%
251.6
22649%
Write 4k
1.146
1.063
-7%
153.3
13277%
84.59
7281%
42.51
3609%
Read 4k
0.602
0.422
-30%
42.7
6993%
25.93
4207%
20.3
3272%
Write 512
63.33
46.87
-26%
294.7
365%
314.4
396%
254.4
302%
Read 512
44.85
34.83
-22%
616.2
1274%
303.1
576%
242.3
440%
Write Seq
130.6
100.2
-23%
294.9
126%
315.4
142%
319
144%
Read Seq
134.6
102.8
-24%
1156
759%
481.7
258%
334.3
148%
3DMark 06 Standard
19244 puntos
3DMark 11 Performance
11159 puntos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
113032 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22619 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9432 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
5067 puntos
3DMark Time Spy Score
3536 puntos
ayuda
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Gigabyte P57X v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
23356 Points ∼46% +63%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20656 Points ∼41% +44%
MSI RX 470 Gaming X 4GB
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop), Intel Core i7-4790K
17738 Points ∼35% +24%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
14904 Points ∼29% +4%
XMG P723 Pro
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire, Intel Core i7-4800MQ
14696 Points ∼29% +3%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
14317 Points ∼28%
Schenker Technologies XMG P507
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
14222 Points ∼28% -1%
XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop), Intel Core i7-4790K
8597 Points ∼17% -40%
MSI GL72 6QF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5825 Points ∼11% -59%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
15806 Points ∼40% +40%
MSI RX 470 Gaming X 4GB
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop), Intel Core i7-4790K
11869 Points ∼30% +5%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
11506 Points ∼29% +2%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
11311 Points ∼29%
XMG P723 Pro
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire, Intel Core i7-4800MQ
11296 Points ∼29% 0%
Schenker Technologies XMG P507
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
11045 Points ∼28% -2%
XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop), Intel Core i7-4790K
5701 Points ∼15% -50%
MSI GL72 6QF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4705 Points ∼12% -58%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
86780 Points ∼53% +10%
Gigabyte P57X v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
79578 Points ∼49% +1%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
79107 Points ∼48%
XMG P723 Pro
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire, Intel Core i7-4800MQ
77275 Points ∼47% -2%
Schenker Technologies XMG P507
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
69834 Points ∼43% -12%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
67791 Points ∼41% -14%
MSI RX 470 Gaming X 4GB
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop), Intel Core i7-4790K
66398 Points ∼41% -16%
XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop), Intel Core i7-4790K
34892 Points ∼21% -56%
MSI GL72 6QF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
33474 Points ∼20% -58%
bajo medio alto ultra
Tomb Raider (2013) 344.9325.4286.2138.4fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 195.1177.3166.498.9fps
Battlefield 4 (2013) 180.1167.2151.499.1fps
X-Plane 10.25 (2013) 81.846.624.524.5fps
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014) 147.5130.910985.7fps
GTA V (2015) 122.3117.790.348.2fps
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 51.249.147.5fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 6561.948.727.3fps
FIFA 17 (2016) 232.7216.2198.6197.9fps
Mafia 3 (2016) 51.347.140.1fps
Battlefield 1 (2016) 116.4104.987.479fps
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) 209.3179.6165.1153.9fps
Titanfall 2 (2016) 143.414389.380.2fps
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
123.8 fps ∼100% +25%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
103.8 (min: 19.8) fps ∼84% +5%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
100 fps ∼81% +1%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
98.9 fps ∼80%
Schenker Technologies XMG P507
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
98.1 fps ∼79% -1%
Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
138.4 fps ∼100%
Battlefield 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
99.1 fps ∼100%
Schenker Technologies XMG P507
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
92.9 fps ∼94% -6%
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.933.335.734.637.92537.740.541.239.637.73140.640.942.939.940.64034.431.933.235.234.45034.531.130.532.334.56329.629.930.628.229.68027.127.528.12627.110027.427.327.52627.412529.429.329.825.429.416027.52924.723.327.520026.127.623.923.826.125025.829.722.422.725.83152832.322.321.62840026.830.220.520.226.850023.126.719.919.623.16302429.819.918.62480028.330.12118.628.3100028.133.119.31828.1125030.535.319.117.430.5160031.836.819.917.931.8200033.438.518.817.533.4250032.937.419.117.832.9315027.937.618.217.927.9400023.329.618.91823.350002227.618.618.322630020.625.918.718.420.6800019.924.118.718.419.91000018.821.218.518.418.81250018.519.518.318.218.51600018.318.918.218.418.3SPL40.946.231.530.540.9N3.34.91.61.43.3median 26.8Asus GL702VM-GC102Dmedian 29.6median 19.3median 18.4median 26.8Delta2.93.12.222.9hearing rangehide median Fan Noise

Ruido

Ocioso
31.4 / 31.4 / 31.5 dB(A)
HDD
31.5 dB(A)
Carga
40.9 / 46.2 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Schenker Technologies XMG P507
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Noise
-9%
-9%
-7%
-8%
Idle Minimum *
31.4
33
-5%
33.2
-6%
31.9
-2%
31
1%
Idle Average *
31.4
34
-8%
33.2
-6%
32
-2%
32
-2%
Idle Maximum *
31.5
35
-11%
33.2
-5%
34
-8%
38
-21%
Load Average *
40.9
45
-10%
47.5
-16%
47
-15%
46
-12%
Load Maximum *
46.2
52
-13%
52.5
-14%
49.4
-7%
49
-6%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.
 40.2 °C53.1 °C41 °C 
 27.1 °C47.2 °C26 °C 
 27.9 °C27.3 °C27.5 °C 
Máximo: 53.1 °C
Médio: 35.3 °C
42.2 °C44.9 °C44.1 °C
36.3 °C36.3 °C30.6 °C
23.5 °C25.1 °C28.7 °C
Máximo: 44.9 °C
Médio: 34.6 °C
Conector de corriente  46.6 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21.5 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Schenker Technologies XMG P507
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Heat
5%
-13%
0%
1%
Maximum Upper Side *
53.1
45
15%
59
-11%
50.8
4%
49.3
7%
Maximum Bottom *
44.9
54.3
-21%
66
-47%
60
-34%
52.7
-17%
Idle Upper Side *
32.9
29.6
10%
33.2
-1%
27.4
17%
32.6
1%
Idle Bottom *
33.4
28.6
14%
30.6
8%
28.8
14%
29.5
12%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.334.639.32541.739.641.73142.839.942.84037.235.237.25037.532.337.56341.828.241.88030.32630.310040.72640.712548.325.448.316049.623.349.620047.623.847.62505222.75231558.221.658.240063.920.263.95005719.65763056.618.656.680057.218.657.2100056.51856.5125054.817.454.8160057.117.957.1200058.117.558.1250058.217.858.231506017.960400066.21866.2500059.818.359.8630053.418.453.4800048.518.448.51000048.918.448.91250048.718.248.71600043.418.443.4SPL71.330.571.3N28.31.428.3median 56.5Asus GL702VM-GC102Dmedian 18.4median 56.5Delta4.424.435.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Asus GL702VM-GC102D audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 17%, worst was 29%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.44 / 0.57 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 15.6 / 20.2 / 21.4 Watt
Carga midlight 90 / 147 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Schenker Technologies XMG P507
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Power Consumption
-24%
-39%
-40%
9%
Idle Minimum *
15.6
19
-22%
18.4
-18%
22.6
-45%
11
29%
Idle Average *
20.2
25
-24%
22.8
-13%
32.7
-62%
16
21%
Idle Maximum *
21.4
31
-45%
24
-12%
32.8
-53%
21
2%
Load Average *
90
90
-0%
175.5
-95%
114.7
-27%
80
11%
Load Maximum *
147
193
-31%
229.5
-56%
167.9
-14%
174
-18%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
5h 53min
Navegando con WLAN v1.3 (Edge 38)
4h 10min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
4h 22min
Carga (máximo brillo)
1h 27min
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 76 Wh
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 95 Wh
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 75.81 Wh
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 65 Wh
Schenker Technologies XMG P507
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 60 Wh
Duración de Batería
11%
5%
-13%
22%
Reader / Idle
353
432
22%
418
18%
353
0%
409
16%
Load
87
115
32%
103
18%
66
-24%
123
41%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
250
247
-1%
201
-20%
213
-15%
274
10%
H.264
262
233
-11%

Pro

+ Pantalla IPS Mate
+ Resolución Full HD
+ G-Sync
+ Gran capacidad de almacenamiento
+ Ranura M.2 disponible
+ Thunderbolt 3

Contra

- iGPU desactivada
- la CPU no rinde a toda su potencia
- Consumo en reposo relativamente alto
- El clickpad no siempre funciona correctamente
Análisis: Asus GL702VM-GC102D. Modelo de prueba cedido por Notebook.de
Análisis: Asus GL702VM-GC102D. Modelo de prueba cedido por Notebook.de

Con el GL702VM, Asus ofrece un portátil de juegos de 17.3 pulgadas bastante delgado. Pero no te dejes engañar por el exterior; el portátil esconde en su interior unos componentes muy potentes. Un Core i7 de cuatro núcleos y una gráfica GeForce GTX 1060 de Nvidia permiten ejecutar todos los juegos actuales en resolución Full HD con ajustes entre altos y máximos. La tecnología G-Sync de Nvidia se encarga de mostrar movimientos suaves. A pesar del potente hardware, la temperatura que se genera es bastante escasa. El ruido emitido por el portátil es también aceptable.

Con el GL702VM, Asus ha fabricado un portátil de 17.3 pulgadas muy adecuado para juegos.

Gracias al disco duro de 1TB no nos quedaremos cortos de almacenamiento a pesar de que podríamos cambiarlo. Esto requiere extraer la parte inferior de la carcasa, lo que puede ser una buena oportunidad para equipar el portátil con un SSD a través de la ranura M.2 (SATA o NVMe). La pantalla IPS mate proporciona muy buenos ángulos de visualización y brillo suficiente. El contraste podría ser más alto. El teclado incluido satisface las demandas exigibles en un uso doméstico. No obstante si tecleas mucho deberías buscar otro modelo. Debido a que la GPU integrada está desactivada, el consumo en reposo es bastante alto. En consecuencia, la duración de batería es menor de la que debería ser. Sin embargo esto no supone un problema en dispositivos para juegos.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Asus GL702VM-GC102D - 12/05/AM v5.1
Sascha Mölck

Acabado
79 / 98 → 81%
Teclado
81%
Ratón
86%
Conectividad
69 / 81 → 85%
Peso
58 / 66 → 86%
Battería
76%
Pantalla
84%
Rendimiento de juegos
93%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
86%
Temperatura
88 / 95 → 93%
Ruido
82 / 90 → 91%
Audio
63%
Cámara
23 / 85 → 27%
Médio
74%
84%
Gaming - media ponderada

Pricecompare

> Español - Home > Análisis > Breve análisis del portátil Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Sascha Mölck, 2016-12-10 (Update: 2016-12-15)