Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del portátil HP Omen 17 (GTX 1060)

Sascha Mölck (traducido por Fernando Alvarez Ude), 02/10/AM

Equilibrado. Con un precio de compra de casi 1300 euros, el Omen 17 w100ng es es dispositivo más barato de su linea. Aunque el rendimiento es ligeramente inferior, ejecuta juegos con fluidez en su panel Full HD mate. El Omen ofrece muy buena duración de batería para tratarse de un portátil de juegos.

HP Omen 17-w100ng (Omen Serie)
Procesador
Adaptador gráfico
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) - 6144 MB, Núcleo: 1405 MHz, Memoría: 4000 MHz, GDDR5 (Samsung), interfaz de 192 bit, ForceWare 376.33, no Optimus, iGPU deaktiviert
Memoría
8192 MB 
, DDR4-2400, dual-channel, dos ranuras de memoría (las dos ocupadas)
pantalla
17.3 pulgadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixels 127 PPI, LG Philips LGD046E, IPS, Full HD, G-Sync, 75 Hz, lustroso: no
Placa base
Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)
Disco duro
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G, 128 GB 
, m.2-SSD + HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, 1 TB HDD @7200 rpm
Tarjeta de sonido
Realtek ALC295 @ Intel Sunrise Point-LP PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexiones
3 USB 3.0, 0 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Conexiones: salida de auriculares, entrada de micrófono, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerometro, TPM 2.0
Equipamento de red
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.0
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 33 x 416 x 279
Battería
95.8 Wh, 0 mAh Litio-Ion, 6 celdas
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionales
Altavoces: cuatro altavoces, Teclado: chiclet, Luz de Teclado: si, PSU: 230 Watt, McAfee LiveSafe (versión de prueba), MS Office 365 (versión de prueba), varias herramientas del fabricante, 24 Meses Garantía
Peso
3.23 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 811 g
Precio
1300 Euro

 

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte P57X v6
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76.4 MB/s ∼100% +5%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s ∼99% +4%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
73 MB/s ∼96%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
72.6 MB/s ∼95% -1%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23.8 MB/s ∼31% -67%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte P57X v6
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89.9 MB/s ∼100% +3%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼97% 0%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼97%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
84.6 MB/s ∼94% -3%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.6 MB/s ∼31% -68%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
676 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
674 MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
529 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
524 MBit/s ∼99%
326
cd/m²
364
cd/m²
362
cd/m²
320
cd/m²
342
cd/m²
334
cd/m²
304
cd/m²
312
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 364 cd/m² Médio: 331 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²
iluminación: 84 %
Brillo con batería: 342 cd/m²
Contraste: 1069:1 (Negro: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.35 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.73 | - Ø
86% sRGB (Argyll) 57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.23
HP Omen 17-w100ng
LG Philips LGD046E, 1920x1080
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3, 1920x1080
MSI GS73VR 6RF
1920x1080
Gigabyte P57X v6
LGD0469, 1920x1080
HP Omen 17-w110ng
LG Philips LGD046E, 1920x1080
Response Times
-1%
41%
1%
-1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
35
38
-9%
28
20%
33.6
4%
37
-6%
Response Time Black / White *
25
23
8%
9.6
62%
25.6
-2%
24
4%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-30%
14%
-9%
2%
Brightness
331
312
-6%
315
-5%
321
-3%
342
3%
Brightness Distribution
84
91
8%
86
2%
93
11%
87
4%
Black Level *
0.32
0.5
-56%
0.308
4%
0.267
17%
0.31
3%
Contrast
1069
652
-39%
1095
2%
1233
15%
1168
9%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.35
6.3
-45%
2.96
32%
5.93
-36%
4.5
-3%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.73
7.37
-98%
2.57
31%
6.72
-80%
3.48
7%
Gamma
2.23 108%
2.37 101%
2.25 107%
2.12 113%
2.23 108%
CCT
6801 96%
7116 91%
7114 91%
7611 85%
6144 106%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57
55
-4%
74.3
30%
57
0%
55
-4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
86
83
-3%
100
16%
87
1%
84
-2%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
-16% / -24%
28% / 19%
-4% / -7%
1% / 2%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 59 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 655 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 28740) Hz.

CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Saturation Sweeps
CalMAN: Saturation Sweeps
CalMAN: Saturation Sweeps (calibrated)
CalMAN: Saturation Sweeps (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
HP Omen 17 vs. sRGB (86%)
HP Omen 17 vs. sRGB (86%)
HP Omen 17 vs. AdobeRGB (57%)
HP Omen 17 vs. AdobeRGB (57%)

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
25 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 4 ms subida
↘ 21 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 35 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (27.3 ms).
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
35 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 14 ms subida
↘ 21 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 276 (máximo) ms. » 25 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (43 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
LatencyMon
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
8258
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
16456
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4815
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
59.61 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
5.32 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.49 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
102.93 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
464 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
132 Points
ayuda
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points ∼100% +12%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
140 Points ∼95% +6%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
136 Points ∼92% +3%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
134 Points ∼91% +2%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
134 Points ∼91% +2%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
132 Points ∼89%
Dell XPS 15 2016 9550
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
118 Points ∼80% -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
679 Points ∼100% +46%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
678 Points ∼100% +46%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
671 Points ∼99% +45%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
635 Points ∼94% +37%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
468 Points ∼69% +1%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
464 Points ∼68%
Dell XPS 15 2016 9550
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
461 Points ∼68% -1%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5484 Points ∼100% +14%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5126 Points ∼93% +6%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
5026 Points ∼92% +4%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4926 Points ∼90% +2%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
4815 Points ∼88%
Dell XPS 15 2016 9550
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
4759 Points ∼87% -1%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20283 Points ∼100% +23%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20111 Points ∼99% +22%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20090 Points ∼99% +22%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
16609 Points ∼82% +1%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
16456 Points ∼81%
Dell XPS 15 2016 9550
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
16161 Points ∼80% -2%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
11903 Points ∼100% +28%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
9520 Points ∼80% +2%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
9307 Points ∼78%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
3301 Points ∼100% +4%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
3168 Points ∼96%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
2926 Points ∼89% -8%
Geekbench 4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
11033 Points ∼100% +6%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
10421 Points ∼94%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
3933 Points ∼100%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
3663 Points ∼93% -7%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ (EDGE: 38.14393.0.0)
269.16 Points ∼100% +22%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
251.96 Points ∼94% +14%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ (Edge 38)
232.36 Points ∼86% +5%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
230.83 Points ∼86% +5%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ (Edge 38)
220.38 Points ∼82%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ (Edge 20)
196.11 Points ∼73% -11%
PCMark 7 Score
5990 puntos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4711 puntos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
6858 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5252 puntos
ayuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
5394 Points ∼100% +3%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
5252 Points ∼97%
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
5014 Points ∼93% -5%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4809 Points ∼89% -8%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4774 Points ∼89% -9%
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
4833 Points ∼100% +3%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
4711 Points ∼97%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4670 Points ∼97% -1%
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
4206 Points ∼87% -11%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4012 Points ∼83% -15%
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
Sequential Read: 495 MB/s
Sequential Write: 180.2 MB/s
512K Read: 315.5 MB/s
512K Write: 172.4 MB/s
4K Read: 20.25 MB/s
4K Write: 76.14 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 141.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 170.8 MB/s
HP Omen 17-w100ng
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
MSI GS73VR 6RF
SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
Gigabyte P57X v6
Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-80%
13%
43%
122%
Write 4k QD32
170.8
1.186
-99%
167.1
-2%
274.9
61%
295.3
73%
Read 4k QD32
141.6
1.106
-99%
251.6
78%
273.9
93%
600.2
324%
Write 4k
76.14
1.146
-98%
42.51
-44%
84.59
11%
153.3
101%
Read 4k
20.25
0.602
-97%
20.3
0%
25.93
28%
42.7
111%
Write 512
172.4
63.33
-63%
254.4
48%
314.4
82%
294.7
71%
Read 512
315.5
44.85
-86%
242.3
-23%
303.1
-4%
616.2
95%
Write Seq
180.2
130.6
-28%
319
77%
315.4
75%
294.9
64%
Read Seq
495
134.6
-73%
334.3
-32%
481.7
-3%
1156
134%
3DMark 06 Standard
24318 puntos
3DMark 11 Performance
10805 puntos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
111645 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
15394 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
8654 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
4806 puntos
3DMark Time Spy Score
3339 puntos
ayuda
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
15806 Points ∼100% +40%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11506 Points ∼73% +2%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11326 Points ∼72%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11311 Points ∼72% 0%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
86780 Points ∼100% +16%
Gigabyte P57X v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
79578 Points ∼92% +6%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
79107 Points ∼91% +6%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
74982 Points ∼86%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
67791 Points ∼78% -10%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Gigabyte P57X v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
23356 Points ∼100% +60%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
20656 Points ∼88% +41%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14904 Points ∼64% +2%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14642 Points ∼63%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14317 Points ∼61% -2%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
123.8 fps ∼100% +25%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
103.8 (min: 19.8) fps ∼84% +5%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
100 fps ∼81% +1%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ
99.1 fps ∼80%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
98.9 fps ∼80% 0%
Schenker Technologies XMG P507
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
98.1 fps ∼79% -1%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
94 fps ∼76% -5%
Battlefield 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ
101.5 fps ∼100%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
99.1 fps ∼98% -2%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
94 fps ∼93% -7%
Schenker Technologies XMG P507
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
92.9 fps ∼92% -8%
Battlefield 1 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
110.1 fps ∼100% +40%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
79 fps ∼72% +1%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ
78.5 fps ∼71%
Anno 2205 - 1920x1080 High Preset AA:4x
Schenker Technologies XMG P507
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
81.1 fps ∼100% +25%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
79.2 fps ∼98% +22%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ
64.7 fps ∼80%
bajo medio alto ultra
Tomb Raider (2013) 290.5289.2274.9140fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 197.8176.2164.899.1fps
Battlefield 4 (2013) 188.8172.8155.7101.5fps
Anno 2205 (2015) 81.97564.730.2fps
Just Cause 3 (2015) 94.68376.770.4fps
Far Cry Primal (2016) 94827359fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 97.19356.529.2fps
FIFA 17 (2016) 276.7270.8222.5227.3fps
Battlefield 1 (2016) 136.4117.586.678.5fps
Civilization VI (2016) 58.147.14342.8fps
Titanfall 2 (2016) 143.5143.589.780fps

Ruido

Ocioso
35 / 36 / 37 dB(A)
Carga
44 / 54 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 31 dB(A)
HP Omen 17-w100ng
6300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Noise
12%
6%
4%
4%
Idle Minimum *
35
31.4
10%
31.9
9%
33.2
5%
33
6%
Idle Average *
36
31.4
13%
32
11%
33.2
8%
34
6%
Idle Maximum *
37
31.5
15%
34
8%
33.2
10%
35
5%
Load Average *
44
40.9
7%
47
-7%
47.5
-8%
45
-2%
Load Maximum *
54
46.2
14%
49.4
9%
52.5
3%
52
4%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.
 41.5 °C39.1 °C39.3 °C 
 37.1 °C37.4 °C33.4 °C 
 32.5 °C33.5 °C29.9 °C 
Máximo: 41.5 °C
Médio: 36 °C
44.9 °C42.4 °C45.5 °C
30.2 °C35.3 °C37.7 °C
23.3 °C27.7 °C24.5 °C
Máximo: 45.5 °C
Médio: 34.6 °C
Conector de corriente  38.1 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
HP Omen 17-w100ng
6300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Heat
-11%
-9%
-24%
-4%
Maximum Upper Side *
41.5
53.1
-28%
50.8
-22%
59
-42%
45
-8%
Maximum Bottom *
45.5
44.9
1%
60
-32%
66
-45%
54.3
-19%
Idle Upper Side *
31.8
32.9
-3%
27.4
14%
33.2
-4%
29.6
7%
Idle Bottom *
29.6
33.4
-13%
28.8
3%
30.6
-3%
28.6
3%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.937.82539.544.63133.238.44028.830.75025.227.16326.126.98025.328.710024.829.21252430.216025.140.920021.655.125022.26431521.167.540019.968.150019.567.66301971.780020.474.1100018.770.9125019.468.8160019.674.2200018.172.9250017.871315017.875400017.976.3500017.975.5630017.977.480001876.11000017.981.41250017.8791600017.769.6SPL30.887N1.572.4median 19HP Omen 17-w100ngmedian 71Delta2.17.239.334.639.341.739.641.742.839.942.837.235.237.237.532.337.541.828.241.830.32630.340.72640.748.325.448.349.623.349.647.623.847.65222.75258.221.658.263.920.263.95719.65756.618.656.657.218.657.256.51856.554.817.454.857.117.957.158.117.558.158.217.858.26017.96066.21866.259.818.359.853.418.453.448.518.448.548.918.448.948.718.248.743.418.443.471.330.571.328.31.428.3median 56.5Asus GL702VM-GC102Dmedian 18.4median 56.54.424.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
HP Omen 17-w100ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 17%, worst was 29%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Asus GL702VM-GC102D audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 17%, worst was 29%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 17 / 22 / 29 Watt
Carga midlight 72 / 141 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Voltcraft VC940
HP Omen 17-w100ng
6300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Power Consumption
3%
-35%
-40%
-19%
Idle Minimum *
17
15.6
8%
22.6
-33%
18.4
-8%
19
-12%
Idle Average *
22
20.2
8%
32.7
-49%
22.8
-4%
25
-14%
Idle Maximum *
29
21.4
26%
32.8
-13%
24
17%
31
-7%
Load Average *
72
90
-25%
114.7
-59%
175.5
-144%
90
-25%
Load Maximum *
141
147
-4%
167.9
-19%
229.5
-63%
193
-37%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
9h 03min
Navegando con WLAN v1.3 (Edge 38)
6h 03min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 13min
Carga (máximo brillo)
2h 25min
HP Omen 17-w100ng
6300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 95.8 Wh
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 76 Wh
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 65 Wh
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 75.81 Wh
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 95 Wh
Duración de Batería
-31%
-43%
-32%
-25%
Reader / Idle
543
353
-35%
353
-35%
418
-23%
432
-20%
Load
145
87
-40%
66
-54%
103
-29%
115
-21%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
363
250
-31%
213
-41%
201
-45%
247
-32%
H.264
313
262
-16%
233
-26%

Pro

+ Buen ratio precio-rendimiento
+ Ranura M.2 con soporte NVMe
+ Soporte G-Sync
+ Panel IPS mate
+ SSD+HDD

Contra

- El touchpad no transmite buenas sensaciones
- No tiene USB 3.1 Type-C Gen2
Análisis: HP Omen 17-w100ng. Modelo de prueba cedido por Nvidia
Análisis: HP Omen 17-w100ng. Modelo de prueba cedido por Nvidia

El modelo básico de la gama Omen no tiene CPU Core i7 sino que ofrece "solo" un Core i5-6300HQ. Por tanto el comprador "solo" tiene que desembolsar 1300 euros. Sin embargo el procesador instalado tiene potencia más que suficiente para los escenarios comunes. El 6300HQ junto a la unidad gráfica GeForce GTX 1060 renderiza casi todos los juegos actuales en resolución Full HD en ajustes altos e, incluso, a veces máximos. La tecnología G-Sync asegura una reproducción de imagen fluida en la pantalla de 75 Hz.

Con el Omen 17 w100ng, HP lanza un equlibrado modelo de gama de entrada en el mundo de los portátiles para juegos.

El Omen tiene no obstante puntos de mejora: HP debería, por ejemplo, mejorar el ruido generado. El portátil genera más ruido del necesario. El sistema de refrigeración parece haber sido diseñado para la combinación de Core i7-6700 y GeForce GTX 1070. Una actualización de la BIOS podría mejorar las cosas. El portátil tampoco ofrece puertos USB 3.1 Gen2 o Thunderbolt 3, que es lo que se esperaría en un portátil actual de este precio.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

HP Omen 17-w100ng - 01/18/PM v6
Sascha Mölck

Acabado
76 / 98 → 78%
Teclado
77%
Ratón
72%
Conectividad
60 / 81 → 74%
Peso
55 / 66 → 80%
Battería
85%
Pantalla
87%
Rendimiento de juegos
91%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
90%
Temperatura
89 / 95 → 94%
Ruido
60 / 90 → 67%
Audio
70%
Cámara
69 / 85 → 81%
Médio
76%
82%
Gaming - media ponderada

Pricecompare

> Español - Home > Análisis > Breve análisis del portátil HP Omen 17 (GTX 1060)
Sascha Mölck, 2017-02-10 (Update: 2017-02-10)