Asus VivoBook S400CA-UH51
Especificaciones de Portátil(es)

Price comparison
Promedio de 6 puntuaciones (de 7 análisis)
Análisis para el Asus VivoBook S400CA-UH51
Origen: Techradar
 EN→ES Archive.org version
 EN→ES Archive.org versionWe are disappointed by a few aspects of the VivoBook S400C: notably the battery life and touchpad gestures, but the overwhelming sense is that the S400C is a very good laptop. It doesn't break the bank and doesn't provide unnecessary expensive hardware. The spec sheet features a decent level of equipment that runs Windows 8 smoothly and should provide you with the power you need. And it's a beautifully appointed laptop for the money. It looks almost like an Ultrabook as well; your friends just won't believe that it was only £500.
Único Análisis, disponible online, corto, Fecha: 01/20/2013
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 80%
Origen: Computer Shopper
 EN→ES Archive.org version
 EN→ES Archive.org versionNo matter how you feel about Windows 8, it's hard to deny that the operating system is best experienced with a touch screen. The Asus VivoBook S400CA is not only tap- and gesture-ready, but it's the most affordable touch-screen laptop we've seen to date (mid-January 2013). That's not to say the S400CA is perfect, not with its pedestrian display and poor battery life.
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 01/18/2013
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 80%
Origen: PC Mag
 EN→ES Archive.org version
 EN→ES Archive.org versionCompared to other laptops, the Asus VivoBook S400CA-UH51 comes in with great bang for the buck due to its high-performance processor, large amount of storage, touch screen, and above all its sub $700 price. The VivoBook far outperforms ultrabooks priced at the $899 or above. While it doesn't have the battery life (or pricing) to unseat our budget laptop Editors' Choice, the Acer Aspire V5-571-6891, the VivoBook S400CA-UH51 certainly has the chops to become our new Editors' Choice for entry-level ultrabooks with touch screen. In the ultrabook category, it's worth noting that the mainstream EC costs almost $200 more, where you would expect more battery life to be part of the equation. At the entry level, the Asus simply gives users what they need for a better Windows 8 experience, at a fair price.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Muy corto, Fecha: 12/27/2012
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 80%
Origen: IT Reviews
 EN→ES Archive.org version
 EN→ES Archive.org versionWith its touch screen, and reasonable price, the Asus VivoBook S400CA-UH51 is the ultrabook to cut your Windows 8 teeth on. The Asus VivoBook S400CA-UH51 is one of the least expensive ways to get a fully functional Windows 8 ultrabook. It's a touch-screen ultrabook that gets the pricing and feature set right.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Mediano, Fecha: 12/27/2012
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 80%
Origen: CNet
 EN→ES Archive.org version
 EN→ES Archive.org versionWindows 8 may have one foot solidly planted in the future, but in the present it needs to be a reliable OS for everyday computers, too. You get a decent 14-inch laptop package in the Asus VivoBook, especially given that it has a touch screen, but it doesn't add up to anything particularly impressive that you can't get elsewhere either with better design or for a lower price.
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 12/12/2012
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 74% rendimiento: 80% movilidad: 70%
Origen: Laptop Mag
 EN→ES Archive.org version
 EN→ES Archive.org versionThe $699 ASUS VivoBook S400CA-UH51 represents a pretty solid value for students, mainstream users and those who have been waiting to pull the trigger on their first Windows 8 machine. This is the lightest and thinnest Ultrabook we've seen that has a 14-inch touch screen. However, while five hours of battery life isn't terrible, other Windows 8 touch screen notebooks last longer on a charge. We also wish the keyboard had a firmer feel.
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 12/04/2012
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 60%
Origen: XT Mobile
 VN→ES Archive.org version
 VN→ES Archive.org versionÚnico Análisis, disponible online, corto, Fecha: 12/05/2012
Comentario
Intel HD Graphics 4000: Tarjeta de video de procesador de gama alta de los modelos Ivy Bridge. Ofrece una frecuencia diferente en los diferentes modelos de CPU (ULV a quad core de desktop) y, por tanto, un rendimiento diferente.
Algunos juegos actuales no fastidiosos pueden ser jugados fluidamente con pequeños detalles.
>> Más información puede ser encontrada en nuestra comparación de tarjetas gráficas moviles y la lista de benchmarks.
3317U: CPU ULV basado en Ivy-Bridge en el segundo trimestre de 2012. Ofrece una frecuencia de 1,7 - 2,6 GHz y un GPU HD 4000 (350 - 1050 MHz). El TDP es de 17 W.
>> Más información puede ser encontrada en nuestra comparación de procesadores móviles.



