Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.2 GHz

Especificaciones de Portátil(es)

Pricecompare

Análisis para el Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.2 GHz

80% MacBook review
Origen: Techradar EN→ES Archive.org version
Apple has given the MacBook's performance a much-needed boost, and it helps OS X zip along much better. Its critical flaws remain, but the 2016 version is less of a risk than it was last year. We just wish it was a bit cheaper.
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 08/11/2017
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 80%

70% Apple MacBook 2016 Review
Origen: Laptop Mag EN→ES Archive.org version
The updated MacBook packs more performance and battery life into a wonderfully thin and light design, but Apple didn't address the biggest drawbacks.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Muy largo, Fecha: 11/28/2016
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 70%

83% Macbook 2016 (12-inch) review
Origen: Tab Times EN→ES Archive.org version
As a Mac user of many years, the 12-inch Macbook definitely requires a compromise in the way I work. For example, my 15-inch Macbook Pro with Retina Display powers a two screen set up and the Macbook 2016 is incapable of doing that, especially as none of Apple’s official adapters currently offer DisplayPort functionality. Ironically, Google makes a USB Type-C to DisplayPort adapter that is perfect for this task, but with the limitations of a single port, the Macbook doesn’t stack up to my particular usage.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Muy largo, Fecha: 11/09/2016
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 83%

80% Apple MacBook (2016) review: Is port-free still the future?
Origen: Pocket Lint EN→ES Archive.org version
The 12-inch MacBook has divided opinion since day one, having done-away with a full-size USB port for the smaller USB Type-C. A couple of years down the line and this will be a more standard format, but the bigger issue is the MacBook's persistence to offer just one of these ports for both charging and connectivity. If you're a casual or cloud-based user that won't be a big issue though. Just as we said of the first iteration: the 12-inch MacBook is all about portability; it's a laptop so thin, so sleek, so light, that everything else has been pushed by the wayside.
Único Análisis, disponible online, corto, Fecha: 09/21/2016
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 80%

80% MacBook review
Origen: Techradar EN→ES Archive.org version
Apple has given the MacBook's performance a much-needed boost, and it helps OS X zip along much better. Its critical flaws remain, but the 2016 version is less of a risk than it was last year. We just wish it was a bit cheaper.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Mediano, Fecha: 09/20/2016
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 80%

70% Apple MacBook 2016
Origen: Laptop Mag EN→ES Archive.org version
The 2016 MacBook is certainly an improvement over its predecessor. It's significantly faster, especially if you opt for the Core m5 model, and it lasts an hour longer on a charge, all while being extremely portable. I also continue to love the Retina display and don't really mind the flat butterfly keyboard.
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 05/02/2016
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 70%

MacBook 2016 Review – Still controversial
Origen: Slashgear EN→ES Archive.org version
I'll be sticking with my first-gen MacBook, then, though that's not going to stop me recommending it to those who travel frequently, have mainstream needs for processing, and who are willing to pay a premium for OS X on a notebook that's still a relatively rare sight in the wild. Apple doesn't expect it to be the Mac for every user: that's why it's not the only Mac. Just make sure you're going into it with your eyes wide open.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Mediano, Fecha: 05/02/2016

80% Apple MacBook Retina 12in
Origen: It Pro EN→ES Archive.org version
The 12in Retina MacBook isn’t for everyone. If you value portability and battery life above all and predominately use wireless peripherals as well as cloud apps and storage, then this MacBook will be a great fit. If you use lots of demanding applications, need to connect lots of wired peripherals or just can’t get on with the low-travel keyboard, then one of Apple’s more conventional MacBooks will be a better choice.
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 04/29/2016
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 80%

82% Apple's updated MacBook is indeed faster with longer battery life
Origen: Engadget EN→ES Archive.org version
Apple deserves credit for improving the MacBook's battery life and disk speeds, but other than that, this is, for better and worse, the same machine as last year's model. If you previously shied away from the 12-inch MacBook because of the "one port" thing, this still isn't the laptop for you.
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 04/25/2016
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 82%

70% Apple MacBook 2016
Origen: Laptop Mag EN→ES Archive.org version
The 2016 MacBook is certainly an improvement over its predecessor. It's significantly faster, especially if you opt for the Core m5 model, and it lasts an hour longer on a charge, all while being extremely portable. I also continue to love the Retina display and don't really mind the flat butterfly keyboard.
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 04/22/2016
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 70%

84% MacBook still short on ports, but this improved minimalist laptop is more tempting than ever
Origen: CNet EN→ES Archive.org version
In hands-on use, the new MacBook feels almost exactly like the previous version. If you've got the 2015 MacBook, there's no need to upgrade, but if you were holding off to see what the second generation looked like, the potential boost to performance and battery life makes me feel even more confident about using this as primary laptop, especially for frequent travelers.
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 04/21/2016
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 84% rendimiento: 80% movilidad: 80%

Rhapsody in Rosé
Origen: Notebooksbilliger Blog DE→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 06/08/2016

Apple Macbook vs. HP Elitebook: Dünn und dünner
Origen: Spiegel Online DE→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, Muy corto, Fecha: 05/30/2016

Apple Macbook 12. Опыт Реальной Эксплуатации.
Origen: Mobileimho.ru RU→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, Muy largo, Fecha: 04/06/2017

Обзор Apple MacBook (Early 2016): ноутбук или планшет — нелегкий выбор
Origen: 3DNews.ru RU→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, Muy largo, Fecha: 07/12/2016

Красивая печатная машинка. Обзор ноутбука Apple MacBook (2016)
Origen: Ferra.ru RU→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 06/21/2016

Comentario

Intel HD Graphics 515:

Algunos juegos actuales no fastidiosos pueden ser jugados fluidamente con pequeños detalles.

>> Más información puede ser encontrada en nuestra comparación de tarjetas gráficas moviles y la lista de benchmarks.

6Y54:

>> Más información puede ser encontrada en nuestra comparación de procesadores móviles.

12.00": Esta diagonal de pantalla es bastante grande para tablets, pero pequeña para subportátiles. Algunos convertibles también usan ese tamaño.

Grandes tamaños de pantalla permiten resoluciones más altas. Por tanto, los detalles como letras son más grandes. Por otro lado, el consumo de energía es más bajo con diagonales de pantalla más pequeñas y los aparatos son más pequeños, más livianos y más económicos.
>> Para averiguar cual fina es una pantalla, vea nuestra lista de DPI.

0.92 kg: Principalmente tablets más grandes y convertibles pesan así.

77.9%: Esta evaluación no es convincente. Debe ser considerado que difícilmente existen portátiles que reciben una evaluación abajo de 60%. Esta portátil es evaluada abajo del promedio, esta realmente no es una recomendación para la compra.

>> Más información puede ser encontrada en nuestra Guia de compra de portátiles.

Portátiles similares de otros fabricantes y con otro CPU

tamaño de pantalla mismo GPU

Portátiles con el Mismo Tamaño de Pantalla y Peso