Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del Smartphone UMi Super Euro Edition

Florian Wimmer (traducido por Francisco García), 10/09/2016

Edición limitada. Se supone que sólo se han lanzado 999 smartphones UMi Super Euro Edition al mundo. El smartphone azul es, pues, bastante exclusivo, aunque no difiere mucho del UMi Super estándar. El smartphone de China es genial en algunas áreas, pero ciertas características quedan lejos de ser "súper".

UMI Super Euro Edition (Super Serie)
Procesador
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 2 GHz
Adaptador gráfico
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Memoría
4096 MB 
pantalla
5.5 pulgadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixels 401 PPI, capacitiva, IPS, lustroso: si
Disco duro
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 24.69 GB libre
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, Audio Conexiones: clavija headset 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD hasta 128 GByte, 1 Lector de Huellas Digitales, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: proximidad, brújula, posición, aceleración
Equipamento de red
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B7/​B20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 8.5 x 151 x 77
Battería
17.4 Wh, 4000 mAh Litio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/​2.0, AF, doble flash LED, vídeos 1080p
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Características adicionales
Altavoces: altavoz en borde inferior, Teclado: Virtual , adaptador de corriente, cable USB, herramienta SIM , radio FM, fanless
Peso
202 g, Suministro de Electricidad: 78 g
Precio
200 Euros

 

Größenvergleich

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Lenovo ZUK Z2
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash (5.0 GHz)
311 MBit/s ∼100% +185%
UMI Super Euro Edition
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash (5.0 GHz)
109 MBit/s ∼35%
Blackview R7
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
102 MBit/s ∼33% -6%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash (2.4 GHz)
47.6 MBit/s ∼15% -56%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Lenovo ZUK Z2
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash (5.0 GHz)
154 MBit/s ∼100% +43%
UMI Super Euro Edition
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash (5.0 GHz)
108 MBit/s ∼70%
Blackview R7
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
79.4 MBit/s ∼52% -26%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash (2.4 GHz)
50 MBit/s ∼32% -54%
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – intersection
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – intersection
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – bridge
GPS UMi Super – overview
GPS UMi Super – overview
GPS UMi Super – intersection
GPS UMi Super – intersection
GPS UMi Super – bridge
GPS UMi Super – bridge

Comparación de Imágenes

Elige una escena y navega dentro de la primera imagen. Un click cambia el nivel de zoom. Un click en la imagen aumentada abre la original en una ventana nueva. La primera imagen muestra la fotografía escalada del dispositivo de pruebas.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
384
cd/m²
416
cd/m²
446
cd/m²
388
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
378
cd/m²
406
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 446 cd/m² Médio: 410.4 cd/m² Minimum: 15.96 cd/m²
iluminación: 85 %
Brillo con batería: 418 cd/m²
Contraste: 1348:1 (Negro: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.4 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.36
UMI Super Euro Edition
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Lenovo ZUK Z2
IPS, 1920x1080, 5
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Blackview R7
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Honor 5X
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen
-10%
-42%
-92%
-13%
Brightness
410
502
22%
420
2%
526
28%
521
27%
Brightness Distribution
85
84
-1%
94
11%
91
7%
85
0%
Black Level *
0.31
0.58
-87%
0.33
-6%
0.64
-106%
0.43
-39%
Contrast
1348
883
-34%
1255
-7%
863
-36%
1244
-8%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.4
3.8
14%
8.1
-84%
11
-150%
4.88
-11%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.6
2.7
25%
9.6
-167%
14.3
-297%
5.2
-44%
Gamma
2.36 102%
2.09 115%
2 120%
2.21 109%
2.26 106%
CCT
6993 93%
6076 107%
7754 84%
12996 50%
7766 84%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
19 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 9 ms subida
↘ 10 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 10 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (27.1 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
29 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 12 ms subida
↘ 17 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 11 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (43.7 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 59 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 4287 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
UMI Super Euro Edition
50072 Points ∼22%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
122513 Points ∼54% +145%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
30676 Points ∼13% -39%
Blackview R7
50572 Points ∼22% +1%
Honor 5X
37152 Points ∼16% -26%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordenar por valor)
UMI Super Euro Edition
1144 Points ∼39%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
1706 Points ∼58% +49%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
831 Points ∼28% -27%
Blackview R7
1155 Points ∼40% +1%
Honor 5X
1089 Points ∼37% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordenar por valor)
UMI Super Euro Edition
523 Points ∼7%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
4506 Points ∼58% +762%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
172 Points ∼2% -67%
Blackview R7
518 Points ∼7% -1%
Honor 5X
103 Points ∼1% -80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordenar por valor)
UMI Super Euro Edition
595 Points ∼12%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
3302 Points ∼66% +455%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
209 Points ∼4% -65%
Blackview R7
590 Points ∼12% -1%
Honor 5X
129 Points ∼3% -78%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordenar por valor)
UMI Super Euro Edition
11654 Points ∼17%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
20910 Points ∼30% +79%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
9768 Points ∼14% -16%
Blackview R7
12585 Points ∼18% +8%
Honor 5X
8174 Points ∼12% -30%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordenar por valor)
UMI Super Euro Edition
10567 Points ∼2%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
32997 Points ∼7% +212%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
4333 Points ∼1% -59%
Blackview R7
10334 Points ∼2% -2%
Honor 5X
7764 Points ∼2% -27%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordenar por valor)
UMI Super Euro Edition
10791 Points ∼5%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
29241 Points ∼15% +171%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
4944 Points ∼3% -54%
Blackview R7
10762 Points ∼5% 0%
Honor 5X
7852 Points ∼4% -27%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
UMI Super Euro Edition
17 fps ∼1%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
91 fps ∼7% +435%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
14 fps ∼1% -18%
Blackview R7
17 fps ∼1% 0%
Honor 5X
14 fps ∼1% -18%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
UMI Super Euro Edition
18 fps ∼4%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
60 fps ∼13% +233%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
8.4 fps ∼2% -53%
Blackview R7
17 fps ∼4% -6%
Honor 5X
14 fps ∼3% -22%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
UMI Super Euro Edition
7.1 fps ∼1%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
44 fps ∼8% +520%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
6 fps ∼1% -15%
Blackview R7
4.7 fps ∼1% -34%
Honor 5X
5.4 fps ∼1% -24%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
UMI Super Euro Edition
7.5 fps ∼3%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
43 fps ∼19% +473%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
3 fps ∼1% -60%
Blackview R7
4.7 fps ∼2% -37%
Honor 5X
5.9 fps ∼3% -21%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
UMI Super Euro Edition
4.7 fps ∼1%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
30 fps ∼7% +538%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
4.4 fps ∼1% -6%
Blackview R7
2.5 fps ∼1% -47%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
UMI Super Euro Edition
5.1 fps ∼3%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
29 fps ∼17% +469%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
1.9 fps ∼1% -63%
Blackview R7
2.5 fps ∼1% -51%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor)
UMI Super Euro Edition
4596 Points ∼55%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
6969 Points ∼84% +52%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
3813 Points ∼46% -17%
Blackview R7
4364 Points ∼53% -5%
Honor 5X
3794 Points ∼46% -17%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordenar por valor)
UMI Super Euro Edition
771 Points ∼50%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
1071 Points ∼69% +39%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Blackview R7
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Honor 5X
9 Points ∼1% -99%
Graphics (ordenar por valor)
UMI Super Euro Edition
666 Points ∼8%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
4335 Points ∼50% +551%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
286 Points ∼3% -57%
Blackview R7
655 Points ∼8% -2%
Honor 5X
763 Points ∼9% +15%
Memory (ordenar por valor)
UMI Super Euro Edition
1052 Points ∼25%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
1983 Points ∼46% +88%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
450 Points ∼11% -57%
Blackview R7
1030 Points ∼24% -2%
Honor 5X
787 Points ∼18% -25%
System (ordenar por valor)
UMI Super Euro Edition
2187 Points ∼33%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
2986 Points ∼45% +37%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
1090 Points ∼17% -50%
Blackview R7
1971 Points ∼30% -10%
Honor 5X
1378 Points ∼21% -37%
Overall (ordenar por valor)
UMI Super Euro Edition
1043 Points ∼28%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
2290 Points ∼62% +120%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
192 Points ∼5% -82%
Blackview R7
338 Points ∼9% -68%
Honor 5X
297 Points ∼8% -72%
Geekbench 4.0
Compute RenderScript Score (ordenar por valor)
UMI Super Euro Edition
1561 Points ∼19%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
UMI Super Euro Edition
2818 Points ∼11%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
1588 Points ∼6% -44%
Blackview R7
2851 Points ∼11% +1%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
UMI Super Euro Edition
727 Points ∼13%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
572 Points ∼10% -21%
Blackview R7
728 Points ∼13% 0%

Leyenda

 
UMI Super Euro Edition Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo ZUK Z2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Acer Liquid Zest Plus Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Blackview R7 Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 5X Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
UMI Super Euro Edition (Chrome 53)
4117 Points ∼8%
Lenovo ZUK Z2 (Chrome Version 51)
8436 Points ∼17% +105%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus (die Abstrahlung von blauem Licht)
2697 Points ∼5% -34%
Blackview R7 (Chrome Version 52)
3885 Points ∼8% -6%
Honor 5X (Chrome 48)
3595 Points ∼7% -13%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
UMI Super Euro Edition (Chrome 53)
9410.2 ms * ∼16%
Lenovo ZUK Z2 (Chrome Version 51)
3290.2 ms * ∼6% +65%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus (die Abstrahlung von blauem Licht)
12910 ms * ∼22% -37%
Blackview R7 (Chrome Version 52)
9748.3 ms * ∼16% -4%
Honor 5X (Chrome 48)
12510 ms * ∼21% -33%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (ordenar por valor)
UMI Super Euro Edition (Chrome 53)
26.211 Points ∼0%
Lenovo ZUK Z2 (Chrome Version 51)
51.655 Points ∼0% +97%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus (Chrome Version 52)
18.028 Points ∼0% -31%
Blackview R7 (Chrome Version 52)
25.349 Points ∼0% -3%
Honor 5X (Chrome 48)
21.92 Points ∼0% -16%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
UMI Super Euro Edition (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
17.88 MB/s ∼21%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
16.17 MB/s ∼19% -10%
Blackview R7
11.87 MB/s ∼14% -34%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
UMI Super Euro Edition (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
36.22 MB/s ∼38%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
27.68 MB/s ∼29% -24%
Blackview R7
15.56 MB/s ∼16% -57%
Random Write 4KB (ordenar por valor)
UMI Super Euro Edition
11.88 MB/s ∼8%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
5.64 MB/s ∼4% -53%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
7.95 MB/s ∼5% -33%
Blackview R7
11.4 MB/s ∼7% -4%
Honor 5X
10 MB/s ∼7% -16%
Random Read 4KB (ordenar por valor)
UMI Super Euro Edition
28.17 MB/s ∼16%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
21.27 MB/s ∼12% -24%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
20.25 MB/s ∼12% -28%
Blackview R7
28.02 MB/s ∼16% -1%
Honor 5X
17 MB/s ∼10% -40%
Sequential Write 256KB (ordenar por valor)
UMI Super Euro Edition
126.95 MB/s ∼62%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
46.52 MB/s ∼23% -63%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
39.51 MB/s ∼19% -69%
Blackview R7
122.67 MB/s ∼59% -3%
Honor 5X
78 MB/s ∼38% -39%
Sequential Read 256KB (ordenar por valor)
UMI Super Euro Edition
257.8 MB/s ∼33%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
239.42 MB/s ∼30% -7%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
178.65 MB/s ∼23% -31%
Blackview R7
247.58 MB/s ∼31% -4%
Honor 5X
144 MB/s ∼18% -44%
Carga Máx.
 41.4 °C43.2 °C42.6 °C 
 41.7 °C42.3 °C42.9 °C 
 40.8 °C41.3 °C41.8 °C 
Máximo: 43.2 °C
Médio: 42 °C
39.2 °C40.2 °C41.4 °C
39.7 °C40.4 °C41 °C
39.7 °C40.1 °C41 °C
Máximo: 41.4 °C
Médio: 40.3 °C
Conector de corriente  37.4 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.635.32525.432.53125.331.84032.929.15033.634.26331.628.98028.428.21002726.412520.825.91602224.120021.323.225020.826.531521.232.740019.440.950019.551.763017.755.180017.963.9100017.867.4125017.368.6160017.465.6200016.768.4250017.267.2315018.269.2400017.974.9500017.667630017.763.9800017.866.11000017.963.11250018.151.61600018.247SPL3080.2N1.342.3median 17.9UMI Super Euro Editionmedian 63.1Delta1.314.233.232.433.229.931.329.930.331.730.332.42632.446.639.446.629.836.229.826.428.626.425.725.425.727.821.327.838.823.338.842.922.542.949.222.449.253.121.353.159.618.459.663.617.563.666.817.566.867.817.267.872.516.872.571.817.371.871.617.471.672.516.672.576.617.376.676.817.676.874.217.674.272.917.772.974.217.474.273.617.773.671.417.971.462.218.162.248.618.148.685.329.885.361.61.361.6median 67.8Lenovo ZUK Z2median 17.7median 67.811.81.611.832.435.631.335.231.735.82627.639.436.236.234.228.627.725.425.121.32323.326.122.532.222.440.121.346.418.454.617.563.217.564.317.268.316.871.117.372.817.47216.673.117.37317.672.917.674.117.772.717.473.117.772.917.972.118.173.918.175.829.884.31.357.6median 17.7Acer Liquid Zest Plusmedian 721.61224.323.124.324.322.32122.722.322.720.322.622.723.723.229.623.721.221.922.221.219.119.32019.117.617.118.517.620.120.12120.130.630.931.930.616.71616.516.718.218.317.318.217.817.618.317.81719.517.31719.529.216.419.527.13917.827.130.643.414.830.63850.915.73842.35616.442.345.66015.845.647.861.713.647.850.963.114.850.950.26312.650.252.264.711.252.252.86510.952.853.4669.753.452.4659.652.448.6619.748.64153.69.44134.147.69.434.129.743.79.429.761.774.426.161.712.828.50.812.8median 38Blackview R7median 50.9median 14.8median 3814.216.82.814.234.139.435.734.134.432.132.434.432.729.727.532.728.635.927.528.631.937.935.431.934.131.429.734.129.326.529.229.325.525.825.325.527.925.724.127.935.628.62335.640.535.223.140.548.943.418.548.953.945.720.553.95748.518.75760.150.218.160.159.750.918.259.75750.319.15764.457.11764.471.362.717.371.374.765.917.474.775.767.517.575.776.267.217.376.279.169.617.279.181.171.917.281.180.170.617.280.176.567.317.676.574.665.117.774.66757.917.86757.547.11857.541.931.417.941.988.279.129.988.265.638.11.365.6median 60.1Honor 5Xmedian 50.9median 17.9median 60.114.713.91.514.7hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
UMI Super Euro Edition audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.18 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 36.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Lenovo ZUK Z2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.29 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Acer Liquid Zest Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.28 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Blackview R7 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.8% lower than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (42.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 97% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Honor 5X audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | very high highs - on average 16.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.34 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.84 / 1.94 / 2.07 Watt
Carga midlight 5.88 / 7.67 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
UMI Super Euro Edition
4000 mAh
Lenovo ZUK Z2
3500 mAh
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
5000 mAh
Blackview R7
3000 mAh
Honor 5X
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
-8%
15%
-53%
2%
Idle Minimum *
0.84
1.31
-56%
0.83
1%
1.83
-118%
0.87
-4%
Idle Average *
1.94
2.03
-5%
2.06
-6%
3.21
-65%
2.08
-7%
Idle Maximum *
2.07
2.08
-0%
2.08
-0%
3.45
-67%
2.22
-7%
Load Average *
5.88
5.45
7%
3.53
40%
5.67
4%
5.26
11%
Load Maximum *
7.67
6.75
12%
4.49
41%
9.16
-19%
6.34
17%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
20h 54min
Navegando con WLAN v1.3
10h 38min
UMI Super Euro Edition
4000 mAh
Lenovo ZUK Z2
3500 mAh
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
5000 mAh
Blackview R7
3000 mAh
Honor 5X
3000 mAh
Duración de Batería
-14%
28%
-35%
-8%
Reader / Idle
1254
1053
-16%
Load
144
WiFi v1.3
638
546
-14%
815
28%
412
-35%
643
1%
H.264
602

Pro

+ resistente carcasa de metal
+ batería de gran aguante
+ buena relación precio-valor
+ dual-SIM
+ software actual sin bloatware
+ GPS razonablemente preciso
+ display vívido con mucho contraste
+ buen rendimiento
+ altavoz decente

Contra

- calidad de construcción no siempre de primera
- pantalla táctil imprecisa
- el soporte de la garantía puede ser un problema
- display no siempre tan brillante
- micrófono con eco metálico
- bastante pesado
- lector de huellas no tan fiable
- la carcasa se calienta bajo carga
UMi Super Euro Edition. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de UMi.
UMi Super Euro Edition. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de UMi.

El UMi Super está por encima de la media en algunas áreas y en la media en otras - pero también tiene ciertos rasgos que sencillamente son inaceptables en un dispositivo que se usa a diario. El color azul es atrevido y atractivo - pero dado que es una edición limitada, no habrá muchos usuarios que puedan comprar el UMi Super Euro Edition. La mayoría de usuarios tendrá que conformarse con plata u oro. No obstante: 200 Euros por un smartphone con carcasa de metal y RAM generosa - es sorprendente. El hecho de que ya hayan anunciado la actualización a Android 7, el software no traiga cambios inútiles, y la ausencia de bloatware hablan a favor del fabricante.

La comunicación con el smartphone va bien en su mayor parte. Las cámaras no son precisamente de primera, pero producen fotos decentes. El display no es absolutamente brillante, pero es fácil de configurar y trae una gran precisión de color así como muy buen contraste. El rendimiento es más que adecuado, el altavoz suena bastante agradable, y el aguante de batería es impresionante.

El gran defecto es la pantalla táctil, que no es nada precisa y hace que manejar el smartphone sea más difícil de lo que debería. ¿Quién quiere manejar un teléfono que no acepta las entradas de forma fiable? La carcasa también se calienta, el micrófono no impresiona, y los juegos más exigentes se trastabillan. 

Con todo, el UMi Super es un smartphone bien equipado con problemas de calidad menores. El mayor problema es la pantalla táctil, que hace miserable manejar el smartphone. 

Uno de los mayores competidores es el más potente Lenovo ZUK Z2.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

UMI Super Euro Edition - 09/29/2016 v5.1
Florian Wimmer

Acabado
80%
Teclado
67 / 75 → 89%
Ratón
67%
Conectividad
41 / 60 → 69%
Peso
88%
Battería
93%
Pantalla
86%
Rendimiento de juegos
25 / 63 → 39%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
45 / 70 → 64%
Temperatura
80%
Ruido
100%
Audio
56 / 91 → 62%
Cámara
67%
Médio
69%
77%
Smartphone - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Smartphone UMi Super Euro Edition
Florian Wimmer, 2016-10- 9 (Update: 2016-10- 9)