Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del Smartphone Wileyfox Spark X

Michael Moser (traducido por Fernando Alvarez Ude), 12/12/2016

Competitivo. Wileyfox lanza su quinto smartphone, el Spark X. Ofrece doble SIM, LTE y una gran batería. Es un dispositivo de 5.5 pulgadas ambicioso, y su precio es inferior a los 200 euros.

Wileyfox Spark X (Spark Serie)
Procesador
Adaptador gráfico
Memoría
2048 MB 
pantalla
5.5 pulgadas 16:9, 1280x720 pixels 267 PPI, capacitiva, multitactil 5-puntos, IPS, NIT: TYP 420, MIN340 (LCD+TP), Cristal Dragontrail, lustroso: si
Disco duro
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 11.29 GB libre
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, Audio Conexiones: 3.5 mm jack, Card Reader: microSD (microSDHC hasta 32 GB), Brightness Sensor, Sensores: A-GPS; Acelerómetro, sensor de Proximidad, brújula digital, OTG
Equipamento de red
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM Cuatribanda (850/900/1,800/1,900 MHz), 3G Doble banda (900/2,100 MHz), Max. velocidad de subida. 5.76 MB/s; LTE CAT 4 Tribanda (800/1,800/2,600 MHz), Máxima velocidad de subida. 50 MB/s, Max. velocidad de descarga. 150 MB/s;, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 8.75 x 154.35 x 78.6
Battería
11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Litio-Polimero, removeable, Tiempo de Conversación 2G (según el fabricante): 10 h, Tiempo de Conversación 3G (según el fabricante): 3 h, Standby 2G (según el fabricante): 352 h, Standby 3G (según el fabricante): 290 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix Auto-focus, flash LED, sensor CMOS, Video @ 1080p/30fps
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix CMOS Sensor
Características adicionales
Altavoces: Altavoz Mono, Teclado: teclado QWERTZ virtual, Luz de Teclado: si, cable de carga / transferencia datos USB, resguardo de garantía y manual de inicio rápido, Android Version 6.0.1 Marshmallow with Cyanogen 13 UI, 24 Meses Garantía,
Valor SAR en cuerpo: 1.306 W/[email protected] (CE)Valor SAR en cabeza: 0.632 W/[email protected] (CE)
Doble SIM, 2x LED de notificación (Rojo, verde) para email / SMS; otras notificaciones, llamadas perdidas
, fanless
Peso
163 g
Precio
179.99 Euros

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG X Power K220
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
47.1 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Wileyfox Spark X
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46 MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG X Power K220
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
53.5 MBit/s ∼100% +11%
Wileyfox Spark X
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
48.3 MBit/s ∼90%
GPS Garmin Edge – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge – Crossing
GPS Garmin Edge – Crossing
GPS Garmin Edge – Riverside
GPS Garmin Edge – Riverside
GPS Wileyfox Spark X – Overview
GPS Wileyfox Spark X – Overview
GPS Wileyfox Spark X – Crossing
GPS Wileyfox Spark X – Crossing
GPS Wileyfox Spark X – Riverside
GPS Wileyfox Spark X – Riverside

Comparación de Imágenes

Elige una escena y navega dentro de la primera imagen. Un click cambia el nivel de zoom. Un click en la imagen aumentada abre la original en una ventana nueva. La primera imagen muestra la fotografía escalada del dispositivo de pruebas.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click para cargar imágenes
534
cd/m²
545
cd/m²
546
cd/m²
543
cd/m²
554
cd/m²
546
cd/m²
541
cd/m²
534
cd/m²
535
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 554 cd/m² Médio: 542 cd/m² Minimum: 20.09 cd/m²
iluminación: 96 %
Brillo con batería: 554 cd/m²
Contraste: 815:1 (Negro: 0.68 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.2 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.24
Wileyfox Spark X
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
LG X Power K220
IPS, 1280x720, 5.3
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Blackview R7
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen
18%
-3%
4%
-36%
Brightness
542
352
-35%
420
-23%
414
-24%
526
-3%
Brightness Distribution
96
85
-11%
94
-2%
94
-2%
91
-5%
Black Level *
0.68
0.2
71%
0.33
51%
0.42
38%
0.64
6%
Contrast
815
1905
134%
1255
54%
981
20%
863
6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.2
7.3
-40%
8.1
-56%
5.6
-8%
11
-112%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.8
7.4
-9%
9.6
-41%
6.9
-1%
14.3
-110%
Gamma
2.24 107%
2.26 106%
2 120%
2.4 100%
2.21 109%
CCT
7118 91%
8417 77%
7754 84%
8422 77%
12996 50%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
30 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 13 ms subida
↘ 17 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 71 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (26.7 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
39 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 16 ms subida
↘ 23 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 40 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (42.8 ms).

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 57 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 6577 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Wileyfox Spark X
32729 Points ∼14%
Blackview R7
50572 Points ∼22% +55%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
30676 Points ∼13% -6%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
28399 Points ∼12% -13%
LG X Power K220
30432 Points ∼13% -7%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Wileyfox Spark X
1700 Points ∼5%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Wileyfox Spark X
611 Points ∼13%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordenar por valor)
Wileyfox Spark X
835 Points ∼28%
Blackview R7
1155 Points ∼38% +38%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
831 Points ∼28% 0%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
716 Points ∼24% -14%
LG X Power K220
860 Points ∼29% +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Wileyfox Spark X
172 Points ∼2%
Blackview R7
518 Points ∼7% +201%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
172 Points ∼2% 0%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
42 Points ∼1% -76%
LG X Power K220
165 Points ∼2% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordenar por valor)
Wileyfox Spark X
209 Points ∼4%
Blackview R7
590 Points ∼12% +182%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
209 Points ∼4% 0%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
53 Points ∼1% -75%
LG X Power K220
201 Points ∼4% -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordenar por valor)
Wileyfox Spark X
10441 Points ∼14%
Blackview R7
12585 Points ∼17% +21%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
9768 Points ∼14% -6%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
9256 Points ∼13% -11%
LG X Power K220
10103 Points ∼14% -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordenar por valor)
Wileyfox Spark X
4680 Points ∼1%
Blackview R7
10334 Points ∼2% +121%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
4333 Points ∼1% -7%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
3858 Points ∼1% -18%
LG X Power K220
4330 Points ∼1% -7%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordenar por valor)
Wileyfox Spark X
5334 Points ∼3%
Blackview R7
10762 Points ∼5% +102%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
4944 Points ∼3% -7%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4432 Points ∼2% -17%
LG X Power K220
4960 Points ∼3% -7%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Wileyfox Spark X
8.4 fps ∼1%
Blackview R7
17 fps ∼1% +102%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
14 fps ∼1% +67%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
5.2 fps ∼0% -38%
LG X Power K220
8.4 fps ∼1% 0%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Wileyfox Spark X
15 fps ∼3%
Blackview R7
17 fps ∼4% +13%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
8.4 fps ∼2% -44%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
9.6 fps ∼2% -36%
LG X Power K220
15 fps ∼3% 0%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Wileyfox Spark X
3 fps ∼1%
Blackview R7
4.7 fps ∼1% +57%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
6 fps ∼1% +100%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
1.8 fps ∼0% -40%
LG X Power K220
3.1 fps ∼1% +3%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Wileyfox Spark X
6.7 fps ∼2%
Blackview R7
4.7 fps ∼1% -30%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
3 fps ∼1% -55%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4.1 fps ∼1% -39%
LG X Power K220
6.6 fps ∼2% -1%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
Wileyfox Spark X
1.9 fps ∼0%
Blackview R7
2.5 fps ∼1% +32%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
4.4 fps ∼1% +132%
LG X Power K220
2 fps ∼0% +5%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
Wileyfox Spark X
4.8 fps ∼3%
Blackview R7
2.5 fps ∼1% -48%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
1.9 fps ∼1% -60%
LG X Power K220
4.1 fps ∼2% -15%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor)
Wileyfox Spark X
3007 Points ∼36%
Blackview R7
4364 Points ∼53% +45%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
3813 Points ∼46% +27%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4283 Points ∼52% +42%
LG X Power K220
3759 Points ∼45% +25%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordenar por valor)
Wileyfox Spark X
10 Points ∼1%
Blackview R7
10 Points ∼1% 0%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
10 Points ∼1% 0%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
551 Points ∼36% +5410%
LG X Power K220
10 Points ∼1% 0%
Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Wileyfox Spark X
292 Points ∼3%
Blackview R7
655 Points ∼8% +124%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
286 Points ∼3% -2%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
313 Points ∼4% +7%
LG X Power K220
290 Points ∼3% -1%
Memory (ordenar por valor)
Wileyfox Spark X
773 Points ∼17%
Blackview R7
1030 Points ∼23% +33%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
450 Points ∼10% -42%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
741 Points ∼17% -4%
LG X Power K220
521 Points ∼12% -33%
System (ordenar por valor)
Wileyfox Spark X
1222 Points ∼19%
Blackview R7
1971 Points ∼30% +61%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
1090 Points ∼17% -11%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
1035 Points ∼16% -15%
LG X Power K220
1092 Points ∼17% -11%
Overall (ordenar por valor)
Wileyfox Spark X
227 Points ∼6%
Blackview R7
338 Points ∼9% +49%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
192 Points ∼5% -15%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
603 Points ∼16% +166%
LG X Power K220
200 Points ∼5% -12%

Leyenda

 
Wileyfox Spark X Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Blackview R7 Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Acer Liquid Zest Plus Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto G4 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG X Power K220 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Wileyfox Spark X
3239 Points ∼7%
Blackview R7
3885 Points ∼8% +20%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
2697 Points ∼5% -17%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2773 Points ∼6% -14%
LG X Power K220
2657 Points ∼5% -18%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Wileyfox Spark X
12625 ms * ∼21%
Blackview R7
9748.3 ms * ∼16% +23%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
12910 ms * ∼22% -2%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
12952.9 ms * ∼22% -3%
LG X Power K220
13196 ms * ∼22% -5%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Wileyfox Spark X
20.745 Points ∼6%
Blackview R7
25.349 Points ∼8% +22%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
18.028 Points ∼5% -13%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
17.094 Points ∼5% -18%
LG X Power K220
18.133 Points ∼5% -13%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Wileyfox Spark XBlackview R7Acer Liquid Zest PlusLenovo Moto G4 PlayLG X Power K220
AndroBench 3-5
42%
-7%
55%
-3%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
20.59
11.87
-42%
16.17
-21%
51.1
148%
18.17
-12%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
39.5
15.56
-61%
27.68
-30%
65.5
66%
32.08
-19%
Random Write 4KB
15.57
11.4
-27%
7.95
-49%
28.31
82%
7.32
-53%
Random Read 4KB
12.26
28.02
129%
20.25
65%
17.9
46%
18.78
53%
Sequential Write 256KB
37.91
122.67
224%
39.51
4%
43.95
16%
43.74
15%
Sequential Read 256KB
194.78
247.58
27%
178.65
-8%
144.12
-26%
196.81
1%
Carga Máx.
 35.6 °C35.6 °C39.9 °C 
 36.8 °C36.5 °C40.5 °C 
 36.7 °C36.6 °C37.6 °C 
Máximo: 40.5 °C
Médio: 37.3 °C
34.4 °C33.9 °C35.6 °C
34 °C34.6 °C36.3 °C
32.7 °C35 °C37.2 °C
Máximo: 37.2 °C
Médio: 34.9 °C
Temperatura del cuarto 21.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.638.22525.435.23125.334.44032.932.55033.643.16331.631.68028.429.91002725.612520.826.41602231.420021.333.425020.837.131521.243.240019.446.550019.554.363017.759.480017.965.3100017.869.9125017.369160017.467.9200016.766.6250017.264.9315018.264.2400017.965500017.665.4630017.766.3800017.869.61000017.970.71250018.164.81600018.254.5SPL3078.7N1.341.9median 17.9Wileyfox Spark Xmedian 64.8Delta1.310.617.919.719.617.919.618.619.519.617.617.521.317.62019.223.22017.715.620.717.715.516.621.915.517.218.214.417.218.120.315.918.128.930.425.328.91424.611.81414.929.511.914.916.432.413.516.418.934.214.718.922.238.813.422.225.843.914.425.83046.910.63036.853.1836.84056.98.94039.856.39.839.83956.183936.952.68.136.936.553.66.536.535.453.86.435.437.756.46.237.74058.15.74044595.74443.658.65.743.638.6545.838.63246.15.8322437.25.62451.167.620.851.17.121.20.37.1median 35.4Lenovo Moto G4 Playmedian 52.6median 8.1median 35.4810.33.6824.323.124.324.322.32122.722.322.720.322.622.723.723.229.623.721.221.922.221.219.119.32019.117.617.118.517.620.120.12120.130.630.931.930.616.71616.516.718.218.317.318.217.817.618.317.81719.517.31719.529.216.419.527.13917.827.130.643.414.830.63850.915.73842.35616.442.345.66015.845.647.861.713.647.850.963.114.850.950.26312.650.252.264.711.252.252.86510.952.853.4669.753.452.4659.652.448.6619.748.64153.69.44134.147.69.434.129.743.79.429.761.774.426.161.712.828.50.812.8median 38Blackview R7median 50.9median 14.8median 3814.216.82.814.232.435.631.335.231.735.82627.639.436.236.234.228.627.725.425.121.32323.326.122.532.222.440.121.346.418.454.617.563.217.564.317.268.316.871.117.372.817.47216.673.117.37317.672.917.674.117.772.717.473.117.772.917.972.118.173.918.175.829.884.31.357.6median 17.7Acer Liquid Zest Plusmedian 721.61231.653.425.432.925.33032.937.233.640.631.640.428.432.42729.220.823.82222.521.327.720.834.621.240.619.448.919.55517.760.417.969.217.874.917.380.117.477.116.773.717.27518.275.517.974.217.674.917.778.717.882.717.97718.166.818.264.83088.51.371.5median 17.9LG X Power K220median 69.21.315.5hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Wileyfox Spark X audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.71 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Lenovo Moto G4 Play audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Blackview R7 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.8% lower than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (42.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 97% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Acer Liquid Zest Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.28 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

LG X Power K220 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.06 / 0.16 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.53 / 1.76 / 1.86 Watt
Carga midlight 3.97 / 4.21 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Wileyfox Spark X
3000 mAh
LG X Power K220
4100 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2800 mAh
Blackview R7
3000 mAh
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
5000 mAh
Power Consumption
2%
3%
-115%
-16%
Idle Minimum *
0.53
0.64
-21%
0.68
-28%
1.83
-245%
0.83
-57%
Idle Average *
1.76
1.3
26%
1.58
10%
3.21
-82%
2.06
-17%
Idle Maximum *
1.86
1.34
28%
1.61
13%
3.45
-85%
2.08
-12%
Load Average *
3.97
4.18
-5%
3.36
15%
5.67
-43%
3.53
11%
Load Maximum *
4.21
4.87
-16%
3.91
7%
9.16
-118%
4.49
-7%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
23h 01min
Navegando con WLAN v1.3
11h 15min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 57min
Carga (máximo brillo)
4h 24min
Wileyfox Spark X
3000 mAh
LG X Power K220
4100 mAh
Blackview R7
3000 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2800 mAh
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
5000 mAh
Duración de Batería
42%
-39%
11%
21%
Reader / Idle
1381
1998
45%
H.264
777
683
-12%
WiFi v1.3
675
987
46%
412
-39%
630
-7%
815
21%
Load
264
365
38%
306
16%

Pro

+ Buena duración de batería
+ Muy buena pantalla
+ Batería extraible
+ El diseño y los materiales elegidos tienen estlio
+ Buena fabricación

Contra

- Mala cámara
- Escaso rendimiento
- Respuesta lenta
- Las teclas de Android están en la pantalla a pesar del amplio marco
- Baja resolución de pantalla en relación a su tamaño
- No trae adaptador de corriente
- Escasa calidad del altavoz
Análisis: Wileyfox Spark X. Modelo de preuba cedido por Wileyfox Alemania.
Análisis: Wileyfox Spark X. Modelo de preuba cedido por Wileyfox Alemania.

Wileyfox anuncia sobre el Spark X: "La mejor pantalla y la duración de batería hacen de este teléfono el dispositivo multimedia de tus sueños". En general el Spark X tiene algunas buenas características: larga duración de batería, que además es extraible, buena fabricación y una correcta elección de materiales. La pantalla brillante y vívida impresiona y el precio resulta muy tentador. 

El Wileyfox Spark X se centra en características concretas: bonito diseño y buena duración de batería en un dispositivo que cuesta menos de 180 euros. Cualquiera que busque un dispisitivo barato debería considerar el Wileyfox Spark X.

Hay muchas cosas que se pueden criticar en un teléfono barato: el modesto rendimiento, la mala respuesta de la pantalla, calidad del altavoz, fotos mediocres (especialmente con poca luz), ausencia de adaptador de corriente, baja resolución (solo 720p) y problemas de robustez. Si puedes aguantar estos defectos, entonces quizás sea un dispositivo adecuado para ti. Si no, la competición en esta categoría es feroz y hay muchas más disponibles.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Wileyfox Spark X - 11/29/2016 v5.1
Michael Moser

Acabado
80%
Teclado
76 / 75 → 100%
Ratón
85%
Conectividad
39 / 60 → 65%
Peso
91%
Battería
94%
Pantalla
82%
Rendimiento de juegos
10 / 63 → 15%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
30 / 70 → 42%
Temperatura
88%
Ruido
100%
Audio
54 / 91 → 59%
Cámara
58%
Médio
68%
80%
Smartphone - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Smartphone Wileyfox Spark X
Michael Moser, 2016-12-12 (Update: 2016-12-13)