Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del Smartphone Lenovo Moto G4 Play

Round 4. El Moto G4 Play puede ser el dispositivo más barato de la línea Moto G, pero Lenovo no ha hecho recortes. En nuestros tests, el smartphone Android de 5" nos impresionó con su buena relación precio-rendimiento, buen hardware, y gran aguante.
Manuel Masiero, Tanja Hinum (traducido por Francisco García), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
, , , , , ,
buscar relación
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Lenovo Moto G4 Play (Moto G Serie)
Procesador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 4 x 1.2 GHz, Cortex-A53
Adaptador gráfico
Qualcomm Adreno 306
Memoría
2048 MB 
pantalla
5.00 pulgadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels 294 PPI, multitáctil, capacitiva, IPS, Gorilla Glass 3, lustroso: si
Disco duro
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.4 GB libre
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, Audio Conexiones: clavija headset 3.5mm, Card Reader: MicroSD hasta 128 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerómetro, proximidad, iluminación, Chromecast, USB-OTG, App2SD
Equipamento de red
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.1 LE, GSM (850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900, 1,900, 2,100 MHz), LTE Cat.4 (ancho de banda 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 9.9 x 144.4 x 72
Battería
10.6 Wh, 2800 mAh Litio-Ion, removeable
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix obturador f/2.0, flash LED, Auto-HDR, vídeos 1080p hasta 30 fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix obturador f/2.2
Características adicionales
Altavoces: altavoces frontales, Teclado: virtual, Luz de Teclado: si, cargardor USB, breve manual, 24 Meses Garantía, fanless
Peso
137 g, Suministro de Electricidad: 30 g
Precio
159 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

156 mm 77.5 mm 10.55 mm 202 g144.4 mm 72 mm 9.9 mm 137 g145.8 mm 72.3 mm 8.1 mm 159 g142.1 mm 72.4 mm 11.6 mm 155 g146 mm 71 mm 7.3 mm 143 g143.6 mm 66.8 mm 7.9 mm 137 g
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Sony Xperia XA
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
92.5 MBit/s ∼100% +103%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45.6 MBit/s ∼49%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Sony Xperia XA
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
83.6 MBit/s ∼100% +79%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.7 MBit/s ∼56%
Moto G4 Play: path
Moto G4 Play: path
Moto G4 Play: bridge
Moto G4 Play: bridge
Moto G4 Play: forest
Moto G4 Play: forest
Garmin Edge 500: path
Garmin Edge 500: path
Garmin Edge 500: bridge
Garmin Edge 500: bridge
Garmin Edge 500: forest
Garmin Edge 500: forest

Comparación de Imágenes

Elige una escena y navega dentro de la primera imagen. Un click cambia el nivel de zoom. Un click en la imagen aumentada abre la original en una ventana nueva. La primera imagen muestra la fotografía escalada del dispositivo de pruebas.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click para cargar imágenes
404
cd/m²
417
cd/m²
430
cd/m²
413
cd/m²
412
cd/m²
416
cd/m²
406
cd/m²
416
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 430 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 414.2 cd/m² Minimum: 14.5 cd/m²
iluminación: 94 %
Brillo con batería: 412 cd/m²
Contraste: 981:1 (Negro: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.6 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 6.9 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
96.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.4
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
IPS, 1280x720, 5.50
HTC One A9
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.00
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.20
Sony Xperia XA
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
Screen
11%
22%
7%
-9%
6%
Brightness middle
412
586
42%
346
-16%
289
-30%
518
26%
418
1%
Brightness
414
566
37%
349
-16%
291
-30%
475
15%
407
-2%
Brightness Distribution
94
84
-11%
93
-1%
96
2%
81
-14%
95
1%
Black Level *
0.42
0.57
-36%
0.61
-45%
0.49
-17%
Contrast
981
1028
5%
849
-13%
853
-13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.6
4.2
25%
1.55
72%
4.7
16%
6.8
-21%
3.92
30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.7
8.4
13%
7.3
25%
11.4
-18%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.9
6.3
9%
2.05
70%
3
57%
7
-1%
3.81
45%
Gamma
2.4 92%
2.39 92%
2.15 102%
2.03 108%
2.35 94%
2.27 97%
CCT
8422 77%
6614 98%
6267 104%
6291 103%
8151 80%
7361 88%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
38 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 7 ms subida
↘ 31 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 95 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (23.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
32 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 12 ms subida
↘ 20 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 27 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (37.5 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 52 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 20917 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 3846000) Hz.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
28399 Points ∼10%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
26169 Points ∼9% -8%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
27232 Points ∼9% -4%
Sony Xperia XA
48331 Points ∼16% +70%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4432 Points ∼1%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
4328 Points ∼1% -2%
HTC One A9
9163 Points ∼3% +107%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4400 Points ∼1% -1%
Sony Xperia XA
11156 Points ∼4% +152%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
4402 Points ∼1% -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
3858 Points ∼1%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
3767 Points ∼1% -2%
HTC One A9
9015 Points ∼1% +134%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3838 Points ∼1% -1%
Sony Xperia XA
10916 Points ∼2% +183%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3789 Points ∼1% -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
9256 Points ∼8%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
9043 Points ∼8% -2%
HTC One A9
9423 Points ∼9% +2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9022 Points ∼8% -3%
Sony Xperia XA
12138 Points ∼11% +31%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
10148 Points ∼9% +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
53 Points ∼0%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
53 Points ∼0% 0%
HTC One A9
680 Points ∼6% +1183%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
53 Points ∼0% 0%
Sony Xperia XA
603 Points ∼5% +1038%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
49 Points ∼0% -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
42 Points ∼0%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
42 Points ∼0% 0%
HTC One A9
618 Points ∼4% +1371%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
42 Points ∼0% 0%
Sony Xperia XA
525 Points ∼3% +1150%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
39 Points ∼0% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
716 Points ∼13%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
719 Points ∼13% 0%
HTC One A9
1051 Points ∼19% +47%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
709 Points ∼13% -1%
Sony Xperia XA
1259 Points ∼23% +76%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
758 Points ∼14% +6%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
9.6 fps ∼0%
HTC One A9
16 fps ∼0% +67%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9.7 fps ∼0% +1%
Sony Xperia XA
28 fps ∼1% +192%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
9.5 fps ∼0% -1%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
5.2 fps ∼0%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
5.2 fps ∼0% 0%
HTC One A9
16 fps ∼0% +208%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
5.2 fps ∼0% 0%
Sony Xperia XA
18 fps ∼0% +246%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
5.3 fps ∼0% +2%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4.1 fps ∼1%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
1.8 fps ∼0% -56%
HTC One A9
6.7 fps ∼2% +63%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3.8 fps ∼1% -7%
Sony Xperia XA
15 fps ∼4% +266%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3.7 fps ∼1% -10%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
1.8 fps ∼0%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
3.8 fps ∼0% +111%
HTC One A9
6.4 fps ∼0% +256%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1.8 fps ∼0% 0%
Sony Xperia XA
7.2 fps ∼1% +300%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
1.7 fps ∼0% -6%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
HTC One A9
4 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps ∼0%
Sony Xperia XA
11 fps ∼0%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
HTC One A9
3.8 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps ∼0%
Sony Xperia XA
4.8 fps ∼0%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4283 Points ∼21%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
3691 Points ∼18% -14%
HTC One A9
4293 Points ∼21% 0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4126 Points ∼21% -4%
Sony Xperia XA
4685 Points ∼23% +9%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3701 Points ∼19% -14%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
603 Points ∼7%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
622 Points ∼7% +3%
HTC One A9
981 Points ∼12% +63%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
585 Points ∼7% -3%
Sony Xperia XA
1043 Points ∼12% +73%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
515 Points ∼6% -15%
System (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
1035 Points ∼5%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
1088 Points ∼6% +5%
HTC One A9
1595 Points ∼8% +54%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1060 Points ∼5% +2%
Sony Xperia XA
2289 Points ∼12% +121%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
1166 Points ∼6% +13%
Memory (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
741 Points ∼8%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
797 Points ∼9% +8%
HTC One A9
1018 Points ∼11% +37%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
643 Points ∼7% -13%
Sony Xperia XA
1076 Points ∼12% +45%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
394 Points ∼4% -47%
Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
313 Points ∼1%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
317 Points ∼1% +1%
HTC One A9
726 Points ∼3% +132%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
312 Points ∼1% 0%
Sony Xperia XA
669 Points ∼2% +114%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
315 Points ∼1% +1%
Web (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
551 Points ∼23%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
544 Points ∼23% -1%
HTC One A9
786 Points ∼33% +43%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
551 Points ∼23% 0%
Sony Xperia XA
717 Points ∼30% +30%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
484 Points ∼20% -12%

Leyenda

 
Lenovo Moto G4 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC One A9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2773 Points ∼4%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
2685 Points ∼4% -3%
HTC One A9
3911 Points ∼5% +41%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
2730 Points ∼4% -2%
Sony Xperia XA
4046 Points ∼5% +46%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3296 Points ∼4% +19%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
12952.9 ms * ∼15%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
13524.7 ms * ∼16% -4%
HTC One A9
11053.7 ms * ∼13% +15%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
13046 ms * ∼15% -1%
Sony Xperia XA
9609.8 ms * ∼11% +26%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
11843 ms * ∼14% +9%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
48 Points ∼6%
HTC One A9
69 Points ∼9% +44%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
47 Points ∼6% -2%
Sony Xperia XA
72 Points ∼9% +50%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
52 Points ∼6% +8%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
17.094 Points ∼4%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
17.533 Points ∼4% +3%
HTC One A9
24.79 Points ∼6% +45%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
16.8 Points ∼4% -2%
Sony Xperia XA
27.5 Points ∼7% +61%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
20.832 Points ∼5% +22%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
144.12 MB/s ∼7%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
130.6 MB/s ∼6% -9%
HTC One A9
187.57 MB/s ∼9% +30%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
147 MB/s ∼7% +2%
Sony Xperia XA
240.43 MB/s ∼12% +67%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
131.42 MB/s ∼6% -9%
Sequential Write 256KB (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
43.95 MB/s ∼3%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
31.1 MB/s ∼2% -29%
HTC One A9
39.61 MB/s ∼3% -10%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
72 MB/s ∼5% +64%
Sony Xperia XA
68.64 MB/s ∼4% +56%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
22.33 MB/s ∼1% -49%
Random Read 4KB (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
17.9 MB/s ∼5%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
9.1 MB/s ∼2% -49%
HTC One A9
10 MB/s ∼3% -44%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
21 MB/s ∼6% +17%
Sony Xperia XA
22.05 MB/s ∼6% +23%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
22.79 MB/s ∼6% +27%
Random Write 4KB (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
28.31 MB/s ∼7%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
3.6 MB/s ∼1% -87%
HTC One A9
3.61 MB/s ∼1% -87%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
11.6 MB/s ∼3% -59%
Sony Xperia XA
10.6 MB/s ∼3% -63%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
5.11 MB/s ∼1% -82%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
65.5 MB/s ∼43%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
38.43 MB/s ∼25% -41%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
79.83 MB/s ∼52% +22%
Sony Xperia XA
72.87 MB/s ∼47% +11%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
51.1 MB/s ∼59%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
18.93 MB/s ∼22% -63%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
46.61 MB/s ∼53% -9%
Sony Xperia XA
50.68 MB/s ∼58% -1%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguracionesValor
 high29 fps
 very low29 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguracionesValor
 high60 fps
Carga Máx.
 37.8 °C34 °C31.9 °C 
 38.8 °C33.5 °C31.4 °C 
 37.8 °C34 °C31 °C 
Máximo: 38.8 °C
Médio: 34.5 °C
32.6 °C34 °C35.4 °C
31.4 °C33.4 °C34.8 °C
31.9 °C33.3 °C35.6 °C
Máximo: 35.6 °C
Médio: 33.6 °C
Conector de corriente  42.1 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2017.919.719.617.92519.618.619.519.63117.617.521.317.6402019.223.2205017.715.620.717.76315.516.621.915.58017.218.214.417.210018.120.315.918.112528.930.425.328.91601424.611.81420014.929.511.914.925016.432.413.516.431518.934.214.718.940022.238.813.422.250025.843.914.425.86303046.910.63080036.853.1836.810004056.98.940125039.856.39.839.816003956.1839200036.952.68.136.9250036.553.66.536.5315035.453.86.435.4400037.756.46.237.750004058.15.740630044595.744800043.658.65.743.61000038.6545.838.6125003246.15.832160002437.25.624SPL51.167.620.851.1N7.121.20.37.1median 35.4median 52.6median 8.1median 35.4Delta810.33.6835.342.132.435.331.13031.331.134.630.731.734.633.733.62633.737.436.639.437.434.526.836.234.527.626.728.627.626.124.325.426.124.626.121.324.624.222.723.324.221.620.922.521.626.921.722.426.937.730.521.337.747.441.418.447.459.652.917.559.668.96217.568.975.869.817.275.875.369.816.875.370.165.117.370.166.761.317.466.766.460.216.666.467.66117.367.666.961.317.666.967.862.117.667.869.963.917.769.974.96917.474.980.57517.780.581.676.717.981.671.866.918.171.855.65018.155.685.680.129.885.659.2421.359.2median 66.9median 61.3median 17.7median 66.913.813.91.613.837.727.732.437.722.330.631.322.326.529.131.726.52931.4262932.337.239.432.32927.736.22924.627.628.624.623.223.425.423.228.321.821.328.330.823.223.330.834.52422.534.537.222.922.437.242.126.921.342.147.428.218.447.456.236.117.556.262.641.517.562.670.848.617.270.875.853.716.875.872.450.217.372.470.548.117.470.568.146.716.668.167.245.117.367.268.547.217.668.570.949.417.670.974.953.217.774.976.554.417.476.576.354.717.776.365.242.617.965.251.330.718.151.346.826.118.146.884.162.229.884.156.714.71.356.7median 65.2median 42.6median 17.7median 65.213.911.21.613.92832.42833.331.333.332.531.732.534.92634.947.639.447.633.736.233.730.728.630.727.925.427.930.421.330.433.223.333.235.122.535.141.822.441.845.421.345.45018.45055.817.555.860.517.560.56717.26767.416.867.468.117.368.164.817.464.858.716.658.76417.36471.517.671.57417.67474.517.774.573.917.473.97117.77169.417.969.458.318.158.348.918.148.98229.88248.51.348.5median 60.5median 17.7median 60.511.61.611.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Moto G4 PlayAsus ZenFone Max ZC550KLSamsung Galaxy J5 2016Sony Xperia XA
Lenovo Moto G4 Play audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.57 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 40.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.09 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Sony Xperia XA audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.02 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 88% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.08 / 0.22 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.68 / 1.58 / 1.61 Watt
Carga midlight 3.36 / 3.91 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2800 mAh
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
5000 mAh
HTC One A9
 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3100 mAh
Sony Xperia XA
2300 mAh
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
 mAh
Power Consumption
-50%
-12%
14%
-11%
18%
Idle Minimum *
0.68
1.15
-69%
0.9
-32%
0.61
10%
0.72
-6%
0.4
41%
Idle Average *
1.58
2.09
-32%
1.2
24%
1.41
11%
1.5
5%
1
37%
Idle Maximum *
1.61
2.17
-35%
1.4
13%
1.51
6%
1.57
2%
1.2
25%
Load Average *
3.36
5.38
-60%
3.8
-13%
2.56
24%
3.48
-4%
2.9
14%
Load Maximum *
3.91
6.08
-55%
5.9
-51%
3.1
21%
6.04
-54%
5
-28%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
33h 18min
WiFi Websurfing
10h 30min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 23min
Carga (máximo brillo)
5h 06min
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2800 mAh
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
5000 mAh
HTC One A9
 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3100 mAh
Sony Xperia XA
2300 mAh
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
 mAh
Duración de Batería
52%
-40%
2%
-46%
-16%
Reader / Idle
1998
1154
-42%
1599
-20%
775
-61%
1364
-32%
H.264
683
465
-32%
658
-4%
460
-33%
677
-1%
WiFi v1.3
630
959
52%
368
-42%
643
2%
353
-44%
526
-17%
Load
306
176
-42%
402
31%
170
-44%
264
-14%

Pro

+ buen display HD
+ Android 6.0 Marshmallow
+ LTE
+ permanece fresco
+ sin ralentización a plena carga
+ buen aguante de batería

Contra

- altavoces poco potentes
- cámaras mediocres
- sin NFC
- pocos accesorios
Lenovo Moto G4 Play. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Lenovo Alemania.
Lenovo Moto G4 Play. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Lenovo Alemania.

"Motorola trae un smartphone de clase media en su Moto G, con impresionantes características especiales." Esta frase fue el veredicto del Moto G 3ª generación. Podemos aplicarlo directamente al Moto G4. El modelo de pruebas combina buen hardware y rendimiento sólido, sin ningún defecto evidente. Comparado con el predecesor, el Moto G4 tiene un SoC más rápido, más espacio de almacenamiento, y un display por menos precio. Si quieres un smartphone bueno y barato, recoemndamos pagar 159 Euros por el Moto G4 Play.

El Lenovo Moto G4 Play es un paquete bien rematado, que incluye un smartphone de gama media con puntos fuertes específicos por un precio relativamente bajo.

El teléfono tiene algunos defectos: el altavoz no es muy potente y las cámaras no impresionarán al usuario. No soporta NFC y el contenido mostrado sólo se puede transferir a un TV usando Chromecast. También echamos en falta el cable Micro-USB separado.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Lenovo Moto G4 Play - 11/01/2016 v5.1(old)
Manuel Masiero

Acabado
83%
Teclado
69 / 75 → 92%
Ratón
93%
Conectividad
38 / 60 → 63%
Peso
93%
Battería
93%
Pantalla
83%
Rendimiento de juegos
5 / 63 → 8%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
36 / 70 → 51%
Temperatura
90%
Ruido
100%
Audio
63 / 91 → 69%
Cámara
60%
Médio
70%
82%
Smartphone - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Smartphone Lenovo Moto G4 Play
Manuel Masiero, 2016-10-15 (Update: 2016-10-15)