Breve análisis del Schenker Technologies XMG P407 (Clevo P641HK1)

Name: SCHENKER XMG P407
Brand: SCHENKER

Jugón compacto. El 14" de Schenker ejecuta todos los juegos fluidamente en su display mate IPS. Las características también son buenas, con una combinación de SSD NVMe y HDD, 16 GB de RAM, y un buen teclado a bordo. También se puede instalar un módem LTE/UMTS si fuera necesario.

Sascha Mölck, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (traducido por Francisco García), Published 03/23/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows

Dispositivo de pruebas cortesía de Schenker Technologies

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

SCHENKER XMG P407

Procesador

Intel Core i7-7700HQ 4 x 2.8 - 3.8 GHz, Kaby Lake

Adaptador gráfico

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile - 4 GB VRAM, Núcleo: 1493 MHz, Memoría: 3500 MHz, GDDR5, 128-bit, ForceWare 378.49, Optimus

Memoría

16 GB

, DDR4-2400, dual-channel, dos ranuras (ocupadas), max. 32 GB

pantalla

14.00 pulgadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels 157 PPI, LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1 (LGD046D), IPS, 60 Hz, lustroso: no

Placa base

Intel HM175

Disco duro

Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e, 256 GB

, + Seagate Barracuda ST1000LM048, 1 TB HDD @ 5400 rpm. ranuras: 1x M.2-type 2280 & 1x 2.5"

Tarjeta de sonido

Realtek ALC892 @ Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio Controller

Conexiones

3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Conexiones: clavija auriculares, entrada micrófono, S/PDIF, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, Mini SD, MMC, RSMMC, ranura SIM

Equipamento de red

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Tamaño

Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 25 x 349 x 247

Battería

45 Wh Litio-Ion, 3 celdas

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: FHD
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Características adicionales

Altavoces: estéreo, Teclado: chiclet, Luz de Teclado: si, adaptador de corriente: 120 W, Control Center, 24 Meses Garantía

Peso

2.118 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 460 g

Precio

1569 Euro

Enlaces

SCHENKER Pagina de inicio
SCHENKER sección de portatiles

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

todas las especificaciónes

Size Comparison

MSI GL62M 7RD-077 SCHENKER XMG P407 SCHENKER XMG P406 Razer Blade (2016) FHD Gigabyte P34W v5 DIN A4 ❌

Left side: Mini DisplayPort 1.4, Mini DisplayPort 1.2, HDMI, USB 3.1 Gen-1 (Type-A), USB 3.1 Gen-2 (Type-C), microphone input, headphone jack, S/PDIF

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
SCHENKER XMG P406	76 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG P407	76 MB/s
MSI GL62M 7RD-077	26 MB/s -66%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
SCHENKER XMG P407	87 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG P406	86 MB/s -1%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077	27.7 MB/s -68%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	561 MBit/s +28%
SCHENKER XMG P407 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	439 MBit/s
MSI GL62M 7RD-077 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (jseb)	312 MBit/s -29%
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	513 MBit/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG P407 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	480 MBit/s
MSI GL62M 7RD-077 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (jseb)	347 MBit/s -28%


278 cd/m²	304 cd/m²	315 cd/m²
253 cd/m²	298 cd/m²	277 cd/m²
254 cd/m²	278 cd/m²	277 cd/m²

Temperatura del cuarto

LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1 (LGD046D) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 315 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 281.6 cd/m² Minimum: 25 cd/m²
iluminación: 80 %
Brillo con batería: 298 cd/m²
Contraste: 1104:1 (Negro: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.42 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.11 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
82% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
82.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.5

Download Archivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	SCHENKER XMG P407 LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1 (LGD046D), 1920x1080, 14.00	SCHENKER XMG P406 LG Philips 140WF1 (LGD040A), 1920x1080, 14.00	Razer Blade (2016) FHD LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1 (LGD046D), 1920x1080, 14.00	Gigabyte P34W v5 2560x1440, 14.00	MSI GL62M 7RD-077 Chi Mei N156HGE-EAL, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display		2%	2%	-13%	31%
Display P3 Coverage	64.5	66.2 3%	65.2 1%	51.4 -20%	85.4 32%
sRGB Coverage	82.1	82.8 1%	83.4 2%	76.6 -7%	100 22%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	60	60.5 1%	60.9 2%	52.8 -12%	83.8 40%
Response Times		-15%	2%	9%	-1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	47 ?(14, 33)	56 ?(22, 34) -19%	47 ?(14, 33) -0%	41.2 ?(15.2, 26) 12%	44 ?(24, 20) 6%
Response Time Black / White *	27 ?(5, 22)	30 ?(8, 22) -11%	26 ?(6, 20) 4%	25.4 ?(3.4, 22) 6%	29 ?(12, 17) -7%
PWM Frequency					198 ?(90)
Screen		-1%	-1%	3%	-50%
Brightness middle	298	282 -5%	272 -9%	277.8 -7%	258 -13%
Brightness	282	266 -6%	277 -2%	270 -4%	234 -17%
Brightness Distribution	80	81 1%	84 5%	83 4%	79 -1%
Black Level *	0.27	0.22 19%	0.26 4%	0.38 -41%	0.54 -100%
Contrast	1104	1282 16%	1046 -5%	731 -34%	478 -57%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.42	4.98 -13%	4.59 -4%	2.71 39%	9.74 -120%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.57	10.2 -19%	8.49 1%	5.47 36%	14.6 -70%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.11	4.08 1%	4.28 -4%	2.11 49%	11.59 -182%
Gamma	2.5 ^88%	2.51 ^88%	2.23 ^99%	2.19 ^100%	2.19 ^100%
CCT	6329 ^103%	5877 ^111%	6848 ^95%	6314 ^103%	11851 ^55%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	54	54 0%	55 2%	48.5 -10%	76 41%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	82	83 1%	83 1%	76.9 -6%	100 22%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)		-5% / -2%	1% / -0%	-0% / 0%	-7% / -27%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 17900 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 3846000) Hz.

Tiempos de respuesta del display

ℹ

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.

↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
27 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↗ 5 ms subida
27 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↘ 22 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 63 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21.5 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
47 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↗ 14 ms subida
47 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↘ 33 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 78 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (33.7 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

5472

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

22216

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

5742

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

64.1 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

8.08 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.66 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

93.8 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

738 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

149 Points

ayuda

... comparado con

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Intel Core i7-6700HQ	149 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG P407 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	149 Points
MSI GL62M 7RD-077 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	146 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG P406 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	141 Points -5%
Gigabyte P34W v5 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	137 Points -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG P407 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	738 Points
MSI GL62M 7RD-077 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	730 Points -1%
Gigabyte P34W v5 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	680 Points -8%
SCHENKER XMG P406 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	680 Points -8%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Intel Core i7-6700HQ	678 Points -8%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GL62M 7RD-077 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.16 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG P407 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.08 Points
Gigabyte P34W v5 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.5 Points -7%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.49 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG P406 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.45 Points -8%
CPU Single 64Bit
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.68 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG P407 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.66 Points
Gigabyte P34W v5 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.65 Points -1%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.65 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG P406 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.6 Points -4%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
SCHENKER XMG P407 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	22216 Points
MSI GL62M 7RD-077 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	21976 Points -1%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Intel Core i7-6700HQ	20639 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG P406 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	20394 Points -8%
Gigabyte P34W v5 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	20195 Points -9%
Rendering Single 32Bit
SCHENKER XMG P407 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	5742 Points
MSI GL62M 7RD-077 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	5568 Points -3%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Intel Core i7-6700HQ	5550 Points -3%
Gigabyte P34W v5 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	5460 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG P406 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	5348 Points -7%

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score
SCHENKER XMG P407 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	3558 Points
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Intel Core i7-6700HQ	3542 Points 0%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	3256 Points -8%
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
SCHENKER XMG P407 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	13693 Points
MSI GL62M 7RD-077 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	13346 Points -3%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Intel Core i7-6700HQ	12873 Points -6%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Intel Core i7-6700HQ	4326 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG P407 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	4321 Points
MSI GL62M 7RD-077 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	4119 Points -5%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
SCHENKER XMG P407 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	14026 Points
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Intel Core i7-6700HQ	13058 Points -7%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	12448 Points -11%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
MSI GL62M 7RD-077 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	252.1 Points +2%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Intel Core i7-6700HQ	247.3 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG P407 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	247.2 Points

PCMark 7 Score		6266 puntos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4069 puntos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		5146 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5234 puntos
ayuda

... comparado con

PCMark 8 | PCMark 7

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
SCHENKER XMG P407 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e	4069 Points
Razer Blade (2016) FHD GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	4010 Points -1%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	3899 Points -4%
Gigabyte P34W v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	3706 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG P406 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	3371 Points -17%
Work Score Accelerated v2
SCHENKER XMG P407 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e	5234 Points
SCHENKER XMG P406 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	5023 Points -4%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	4920 Points -6%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	4831 Points -8%
Gigabyte P34W v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	4649 Points -11%

PCMark 7 - Score
SCHENKER XMG P407 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e	6266 Points
Gigabyte P34W v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	6242 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG P406 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	6147 Points -2%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	5874 Points -6%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	3818 Points -39%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e

Sequential Read: 1345 MB/s

Sequential Write: 1502 MB/s

512K Read: 320.3 MB/s

512K Write: 1276 MB/s

4K Read: 58.9 MB/s

4K Write: 171 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 625 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 539 MB/s

	SCHENKER XMG P407 Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e	SCHENKER XMG P406 Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	Razer Blade (2016) FHD	Gigabyte P34W v5 Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	MSI GL62M 7RD-077 HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		14%	20%	31%	-96%
Read Seq	1345	1634 21%	1977 47%	2269 69%	112.4 -92%
Write Seq	1502	1290 -14%	1668 11%	1524 1%	107.3 -93%
Read 512	320.3	1149 259%	800 150%	937 193%	43.19 -87%
Write 512	1276	1285 1%	1030 -19%	1483 16%	57 -96%
Read 4k	58.9	43.82 -26%	58.1 -1%	53.8 -9%	0.494 -99%
Write 4k	171	110.3 -35%	145.6 -15%	167.3 -2%	1.122 -99%
Read 4k QD32	625	320.5 -49%	592 -5%	622 0%	1.088 -100%
Write 4k QD32	539	287.3 -47%	508 -6%	418.9 -22%	1.234 -100%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		26084 puntos
3DMark 11 Performance		9921 puntos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		83626 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		22393 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		7194 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		3766 puntos
3DMark Time Spy Score		2659 puntos
ayuda

... comparado con

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	78820 Points +46%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	61281 Points +14%
SCHENKER XMG P407 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	53978 Points
SCHENKER XMG P406 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M	51975 Points -4%
Gigabyte P34W v5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M	51225 Points -5%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	49539 Points -8%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile	39824 Points -26%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11622 Points +39%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	10791 Points +29%
SCHENKER XMG P407 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	8376 Points
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	7646 Points -9%
Gigabyte P34W v5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M	7457 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG P406 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M	7436 Points -11%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile	6382 Points -24%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	15387 Points +48%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	13534 Points +30%
SCHENKER XMG P407 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	10402 Points
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	9725 Points -7%
Gigabyte P34W v5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M	9691 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG P406 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M	9649 Points -7%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile	8223 Points -21%

	bajo	medio	alto	ultra
Tomb Raider (2013)	360.1	258.1	199.2	98.9
BioShock Infinite (2013)	168.9	159.2	152.2	76.4
Battlefield 4 (2013)	178.6	174.9	145.7	71
Ashes of the Singularity (2016)	63.2	45.6	40.4
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)	99	74.7	39.8	20.3
Battlefield 1 (2016)	142.1	122.1	62.4	56.3
Civilization VI (2016)	70.2	50.1	41.8	42.4
Titanfall 2 (2016)	143.7	136.5	68.5	58.6

BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	102.3 fps +34%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	94 fps +23%
SCHENKER XMG P407 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	76.4 fps
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	72.8 fps -5%
Gigabyte P34W v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	71.4 fps -7%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	66.2 fps -13%

Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	144.9 fps +47%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	131.7 fps +33%
SCHENKER XMG P407 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	98.9 fps
Gigabyte P34W v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	87.4 fps -12%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	80.6 fps -19%

Battlefield 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	99.8 fps +41%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	94 fps +32%
SCHENKER XMG P407 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	71 fps
SCHENKER XMG P406 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	58.1 fps -18%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	52 fps -27%

Battlefield 1 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
SCHENKER XMG P407 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	56.3 fps
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	51.2 fps -9%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	44.4 fps -21%

Ashes of the Singularity - 1920x1080 high
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	57.4 fps +42%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	49.4 fps +22%
SCHENKER XMG P407 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	40.4 fps
MSI GL62M 7RD-077 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	29.1 fps -28%

Titanfall 2 - 1920x1080 Very High (Insane Texture Quality) / Enabled AA:TS AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	78.5 fps +34%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	66.7 fps +14%
SCHENKER XMG P407 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	58.6 fps
MSI GL62M 7RD-077 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	45.5 fps -22%

Civilization VI - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4xMS
SCHENKER XMG P407 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	42.4 fps
MSI GL62M 7RD-077 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	34.1 fps -20%

Deus Ex Mankind Divided - 1920x1080 High Preset AF:4x
Razer Blade (2016) FHD GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	52.4 fps +32%
SCHENKER XMG P407 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	39.8 fps
MSI GL62M 7RD-077 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	32.2 fps -19%

Ruido

Ocioso		31 / 32 / 36 dB(A)
HDD		32 dB(A)
Carga		43 / 48 dB(A)

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 29 dB(A)

	SCHENKER XMG P407 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	SCHENKER XMG P406 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M	Razer Blade (2016) FHD 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	Gigabyte P34W v5 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M	MSI GL62M 7RD-077 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
Noise		-5%	-9%	-2%	1%
off / environment *	29		31 -7%		30.6 -6%
Idle Minimum *	31	30 3%	35 -13%	31.6 -2%	32.5 -5%
Idle Average *	32	32 -0%	36 -13%	31.6 1%	32.5 -2%
Idle Maximum *	36	40 -11%	37 -3%	32.5 10%	32.5 10%
Load Average *	43	47 -9%	43 -0%	46.5 -8%	36.4 15%
Load Maximum *	48	51 -6%	57 -19%	52.5 -9%	52.4 -9%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.

Inactivo


43.6 °C	48.7 °C	46 °C
43.6 °C	49 °C	45.7 °C
34.7 °C	36.4 °C	27 °C

Máximo: 49 °C
Médio: 41.6 °C


44.7 °C	43.8 °C	44 °C
40.9 °C	50.8 °C	48.6 °C
30.1 °C	31.9 °C	31.6 °C

Máximo: 50.8 °C
Médio: 40.7 °C

Conector de corriente 49 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.8 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.5 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.4 °C / 97.5 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-7.5 °C / -13.5 F).

	SCHENKER XMG P407 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	SCHENKER XMG P406 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M	Razer Blade (2016) FHD 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	Gigabyte P34W v5 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M	MSI GL62M 7RD-077 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
Heat		-35%	-6%	-18%	2%
Maximum Upper Side *	49	55 -12%	54 -10%	59.3 -21%	44.9 8%
Maximum Bottom *	50.8	58.7 -16%	49.4 3%	56.5 -11%	38.2 25%
Idle Upper Side *	26.3	36.9 -40%	28 -6%	27.8 -6%	27.4 -4%
Idle Bottom *	24.1	41.7 -73%	26.8 -11%	31.8 -32%	29 -20%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Speakers

SCHENKER XMG P407 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Razer Blade (2016) FHD audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de corriente

Off / Standby	0.6 / 1.1 Watt
Ocioso	10 / 15 / 24 Watt
Carga	82 / 124 Watt


Clave: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	SCHENKER XMG P407 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	SCHENKER XMG P406 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M	Razer Blade (2016) FHD 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	MSI GL62M 7RD-077 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
Power Consumption		-13%	-10%	3%
Idle Minimum *	10	12 -20%	14 -40%	10.6 -6%
Idle Average *	15	16 -7%	18 -20%	14.5 3%
Idle Maximum *	24	22 8%	21 12%	15 37%
Load Average *	82	90 -10%	70 15%	90 -10%
Load Maximum *	124	170 -37%	146 -18%	135 -9%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería

Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)		7h 23min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38)		4h 01min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		3h 33min
Carga (máximo brillo)		1h 32min

	SCHENKER XMG P407 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 45 Wh	SCHENKER XMG P406 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, 45 Wh	Razer Blade (2016) FHD 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 70 Wh	Gigabyte P34W v5 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, 61 Wh	MSI GL62M 7RD-077 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 41 Wh
Duración de Batería		-26%	40%	-22%	-18%
Reader / Idle	443	275 -38%	760 72%	392 -12%	387 -13%
H.264	213		312 46%		217 2%
WiFi v1.3	241	197 -18%	427 77%	232 -4%	225 -7%
Load	92	72 -22%	59 -36%	47 -49%	41 -55%

Pro

+ sólida carcasa bien fabricada

+ ampliamente configurable

+ dispositivos de entrada buenísimos

+ display mate IPS

+ muchos puertos

+ SSD NVMe

Contra

- uso del turbo y aguante de batería mejorables

- display con tiempos de respuesta lentos

- bajo rendimiento en batería

- sin Thunderbolt 3

XMG P407. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Schenker Technologies

On the outside, the XMG P407 is not different from its predecessor. That is why we shall focus on the new features, which are found primarily on the inside. The new Kaby Lake processor provides a slight performance increase. The fresh CPU also has a good, though modest, impact on battery life. The built-in GeForce GTX 1050 Ti core is in the upper middle range of Nvidia's current line-up, but it offers more performance than many top-range models of the previous generation. In other words: The GeForce GTX 970M chip built into the XMG P406 loses in 3DMark benchmarks as well as in real-world gaming.

The heat development under load can be described as moderate: The XMG P407 does not become as warm as its predecessor. The differences between the P406 and the P407 in terms of system noise are small. However, we notice some improvement: The CPU fan in the P406 likes to speed up unexpectedly and is then clearly perceptible. This behavior is apparently not present in the P407. The ports bear further updates: One of the four USB 3.1 Type-A Gen-1 ports makes way for a USB 3.1 Type-C Gen-2 port. In addition, one of the two Mini DisplayPorts is now equipped with the 1.4 standard.

With the XMG P407, Schenker delivers a well-rounded 14-inch gaming notebook.

A lightning-quick NVMe SSD ensures a snappy system. The required storage space is provided by a 2.5-inch hard drive. Both drives can be exchanged, since the bottom plate of the base unit can be removed effortlessly. A good keyboard is also in the package. The matte IPS display has pleasantly wide viewing angles and good contrast. However, the display could offer more in terms of brightness. The switching times of the built-in display are only slightly better than those of the XMG P406.

SCHENKER XMG P407 - 2017-03-06 03/06/2017 v6^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Acabado

76 / 98 → 78%

Teclado

83%

Ratón

86%

Conectividad

66 / 81 → 82%

Peso

62 / 10-66 → 93%

Battería

73%

Pantalla

86%

Rendimiento de juegos

90%

Rendimiento de la Aplicación

94%

Temperatura

86 / 95 → 90%

Ruido

76 / 90 → 84%

Audio

71%

Cámara

52 / 85 → 61%

Médio

77%

85%

Gaming - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Schenker Technologies XMG P407 (Clevo P641HK1)

Sascha Mölck, 2017-03-23 (Update: 2017-03-23)