Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del Smartphone LG X Cam

Marcus Herbrich (traducido por Francisco García), 08/27/AM

Cámara experta. El último producto de LG con una "X" en su nombre combina smartphones de gama media con características escogidas que normalmente aparecen en los de gama alta. El LG X Cam sobresale con un extra especial en la sección de cámara. Descubre si la calidad del módulo de cámara también es extra bueno.

bien (82%) LG X Cam Mediatek MT6753ARM Mali-T720 MP4 v5.1 - 08/23/AM
Dispositivo de pruebas cortesía de LG Deutschland
(download rating image as PNG or SVG)
LG X Cam
Procesador
Mediatek MT6753 1.5 GHz
Adaptador gráfico
ARM Mali-T720 MP4
Memoría
2048 MB 
pantalla
5.2 pulgadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixels 424 PPI, multitáctil, capacitiva, LCD, IPS, lustroso: si
Disco duro
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10 GB libre
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, Audio Conexiones: clavija headset 3.5mm, Card Reader: micro-SD , NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerómetro, proximidad, brújula, giroscopio, Miracast, Wifi Direct, Android Beam, DLNA
Equipamento de red
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, LTE (800/1800/2600 MHz), 3G (850/900/1900/2100 MHz), 2G (850/900/1800/1900MHz), LTE, GPS
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 6.9 x 147.5 x 73.6
Battería
2500 mAh Litio-Ion, Tiempo de Conversación 2G (según el fabricante): 6 h, Tiempo de Conversación 3G (según el fabricante): 7 h, Standby 2G (según el fabricante): 260 h, Standby 3G (según el fabricante): 260 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix ángulo estándar 75°: 4160 x 3120 pixels; gran angular 120°: 2560 x 1920 pixels
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Características adicionales
Altavoces: mono, Teclado: virtual, teclado LG Smart, Luz de Teclado: si, headset, cargador, cable de datos USB, guía de inicio rápido, LG UI, KnockCode, Easy Home, Capture+, 24 Meses Garantía, SAR: 0.562 W/Kg (head), fanless
Peso
118.2 g, Suministro de Electricidad: 41 g
Precio
280 Euros

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash (5.0 GHz)
303 MBit/s ∼100% +625%
LG X Cam
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash (2.4 GHz)
41.8 MBit/s ∼14%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash (5.0 GHz)
151 MBit/s ∼100% +203%
LG X Cam
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash (2.4 GHz)
49.8 MBit/s ∼33%
GPS Test LG X Cam
GPS Test LG X Cam
GPS Test LG X Cam
GPS Test Garmin Edge 500
GPS Test Garmin Edge 500
GPS Test Garmin Edge 500
Standard angle (75°)
Wide angle (120°)
Combined wide and standard angle

Comparación de Imágenes

Elige una escena y navega dentro de la primera imagen. Un click cambia el nivel de zoom. Un click en la imagen aumentada abre la original en una ventana nueva. La primera imagen muestra la fotografía escalada del dispositivo de pruebas.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
348
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
341
cd/m²
343
cd/m²
362
cd/m²
343
cd/m²
359
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
346
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 362 cd/m² Médio: 348.2 cd/m² Minimum: 3.76 cd/m²
iluminación: 94 %
Brillo con batería: 362 cd/m²
Contraste: 1448:1 (Negro: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.8 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 8.4 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.22
LG X Cam
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
ZTE Blade V7
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Lenovo Moto G4
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
OnePlus X
Active Matrix OLED, 1920x1080, 5
Huawei P9 Lite
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
LG G5
IPS Quantum, 2560x1440, 5.3
Screen
-22%
-6%
-1%
-23%
14%
Brightness
348
411
18%
723
108%
314
-10%
468
34%
774
122%
Brightness Distribution
94
96
2%
87
-7%
91
-3%
88
-6%
91
-3%
Black Level *
0.25
0.38
-52%
0.71
-184%
0.74
-196%
0.43
-72%
Contrast
1448
1076
-26%
1020
-30%
682
-53%
1823
26%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.8
9.4
-38%
4.5
34%
6.28
8%
4.1
40%
6.5
4%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
8.4
11.6
-38%
4.9
42%
8.24
2%
4.9
42%
8
5%
Gamma
2.22 108%
2.25 107%
2.44 98%
2.12 113%
2.5 96%
2.22 108%
CCT
8242 79%
9597 68%
6496 100%
8145 80%
7116 91%
8699 75%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
68.08
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
97.46

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
30 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 13 ms subida
↘ 17 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 70 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (27.3 ms).
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
48 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 21 ms subida
↘ 27 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 73 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (44.3 ms).

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 60 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 965 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 30860) Hz.

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
LG X Cam (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
19.3 MB/s ∼22%
ZTE Blade V7 ( Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
20.89 MB/s ∼24% +8%
Lenovo Moto G4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
49.7 MB/s ∼57% +158%
Huawei P9 Lite (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
25.1 MB/s ∼29% +30%
LG G5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
45.53 MB/s ∼52% +136%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
LG X Cam (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
37.13 MB/s ∼38%
ZTE Blade V7 ( Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
43.67 MB/s ∼45% +18%
Lenovo Moto G4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
78.49 MB/s ∼81% +111%
Huawei P9 Lite (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
60.81 MB/s ∼63% +64%
LG G5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
78.53 MB/s ∼81% +112%
Random Write 4KB (ordenar por valor)
LG X Cam
5.52 MB/s ∼4%
ZTE Blade V7
7.58 MB/s ∼5% +37%
Lenovo Moto G4
37.5 MB/s ∼25% +579%
OnePlus X
14.22 MB/s ∼9% +158%
Huawei P9 Lite
15.35 MB/s ∼10% +178%
LG G5
16.22 MB/s ∼11% +194%
Random Read 4KB (ordenar por valor)
LG X Cam
18.07 MB/s ∼11%
ZTE Blade V7
28.07 MB/s ∼17% +55%
Lenovo Moto G4
36.4 MB/s ∼22% +101%
OnePlus X
16.31 MB/s ∼10% -10%
Huawei P9 Lite
38.22 MB/s ∼23% +112%
LG G5
89.26 MB/s ∼53% +394%
Sequential Write 256KB (ordenar por valor)
LG X Cam
65.84 MB/s ∼35%
ZTE Blade V7
39.45 MB/s ∼21% -40%
Lenovo Moto G4
46.3 MB/s ∼24% -30%
OnePlus X
49.31 MB/s ∼26% -25%
Huawei P9 Lite
46.24 MB/s ∼24% -30%
LG G5
141.26 MB/s ∼74% +115%
Sequential Read 256KB (ordenar por valor)
LG X Cam
201.55 MB/s ∼27%
ZTE Blade V7
196.76 MB/s ∼27% -2%
Lenovo Moto G4
272.2 MB/s ∼37% +35%
OnePlus X
235.51 MB/s ∼32% +17%
Huawei P9 Lite
283.55 MB/s ∼38% +41%
LG G5
427.65 MB/s ∼58% +112%
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
LG X Cam
35471 Points ∼19%
ZTE Blade V7
37070 Points ∼20% +5%
Lenovo Moto G4
45242 Points ∼25% +28%
OnePlus X
52463 Points ∼28% +48%
Huawei P9 Lite
50366 Points ∼27% +42%
LG G5
124244 Points ∼67% +250%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
LG X Cam
2497 Points ∼8%
ZTE Blade V7
2669 Points ∼8% +7%
Lenovo Moto G4
3052 Points ∼9% +22%
Huawei P9 Lite
3768 Points ∼12% +51%
LG G5
5507 Points ∼17% +121%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
LG X Cam
535 Points ∼11%
ZTE Blade V7
614 Points ∼13% +15%
Lenovo Moto G4
720 Points ∼15% +35%
Huawei P9 Lite
883 Points ∼19% +65%
LG G5
2396 Points ∼50% +348%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordenar por valor)
LG X Cam
1002 Points ∼39%
ZTE Blade V7
944 Points ∼36% -6%
Lenovo Moto G4
1022 Points ∼40% +2%
OnePlus X
1117 Points ∼43% +11%
Huawei P9 Lite
1373 Points ∼53% +37%
LG G5
1695 Points ∼66% +69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordenar por valor)
LG X Cam
245 Points ∼3%
ZTE Blade V7
245 Points ∼3% 0%
Lenovo Moto G4
609 Points ∼8% +149%
OnePlus X
643 Points ∼8% +162%
Huawei P9 Lite
473 Points ∼6% +93%
LG G5
4468 Points ∼58% +1724%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordenar por valor)
LG X Cam
294 Points ∼6%
ZTE Blade V7
293 Points ∼6% 0%
Lenovo Moto G4
669 Points ∼14% +128%
OnePlus X
710 Points ∼15% +141%
Huawei P9 Lite
554 Points ∼11% +88%
LG G5
3277 Points ∼67% +1015%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordenar por valor)
LG X Cam
10234 Points ∼15%
ZTE Blade V7
10430 Points ∼15% +2%
Lenovo Moto G4
9668 Points ∼14% -6%
OnePlus X
17156 Points ∼25% +68%
Huawei P9 Lite
13676 Points ∼20% +34%
LG G5
20997 Points ∼30% +105%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordenar por valor)
LG X Cam
6044 Points ∼1%
ZTE Blade V7
6170 Points ∼1% +2%
Lenovo Moto G4
9816 Points ∼2% +62%
OnePlus X
14541 Points ∼3% +141%
Huawei P9 Lite
11318 Points ∼2% +87%
LG G5
32109 Points ∼7% +431%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordenar por valor)
LG X Cam
6649 Points ∼3%
ZTE Blade V7
6786 Points ∼3% +2%
Lenovo Moto G4
9783 Points ∼5% +47%
OnePlus X
15051 Points ∼8% +126%
Huawei P9 Lite
11769 Points ∼6% +77%
LG G5
28730 Points ∼15% +332%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
LG X Cam
13 fps ∼1%
ZTE Blade V7
12 fps ∼1% -8%
Lenovo Moto G4
17 fps ∼1% +31%
OnePlus X
21 fps ∼2% +62%
Huawei P9 Lite
19 fps ∼1% +46%
LG G5
74 fps ∼6% +469%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
LG X Cam
12 fps ∼3%
ZTE Blade V7
12 fps ∼3% 0%
Lenovo Moto G4
17 fps ∼4% +42%
OnePlus X
23 fps ∼5% +92%
Huawei P9 Lite
19 fps ∼4% +58%
LG G5
47 fps ∼10% +292%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
LG X Cam
4.8 fps ∼1%
ZTE Blade V7
4.5 fps ∼1% -6%
Lenovo Moto G4
6.4 fps ∼1% +33%
OnePlus X
8.6 fps ∼2% +79%
Huawei P9 Lite
7.8 fps ∼1% +63%
LG G5
42 fps ∼8% +775%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
LG X Cam
4.5 fps ∼2%
ZTE Blade V7
4.5 fps ∼2% 0%
Lenovo Moto G4
6.7 fps ∼3% +49%
OnePlus X
10 fps ∼4% +122%
Huawei P9 Lite
8.4 fps ∼4% +87%
LG G5
30 fps ∼13% +567%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
LG X Cam
3.1 fps ∼1%
ZTE Blade V7
2.9 fps ∼1% -6%
Lenovo Moto G4
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei P9 Lite
4.5 fps ∼1% +45%
LG G5
31 fps ∼7% +900%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
LG X Cam
2.9 fps ∼2%
ZTE Blade V7
2.9 fps ∼2% 0%
Lenovo Moto G4
4.5 fps ∼3% +55%
Huawei P9 Lite
4.9 fps ∼3% +69%
LG G5
17 fps ∼10% +486%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor)
LG X Cam
3882 Points ∼48%
ZTE Blade V7
3947 Points ∼49% +2%
Lenovo Moto G4
5154 Points ∼63% +33%
OnePlus X
4450 Points ∼55% +15%
Huawei P9 Lite
5339 Points ∼66% +38%
LG G5
5581 Points ∼69% +44%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordenar por valor)
LG X Cam
10 Points ∼1%
ZTE Blade V7
10 Points ∼1% 0%
Lenovo Moto G4
10 Points ∼1% 0%
OnePlus X
843 Points ∼55% +8330%
Huawei P9 Lite
765 Points ∼50% +7550%
LG G5
900 Points ∼58% +8900%
Graphics (ordenar por valor)
LG X Cam
424 Points ∼5%
ZTE Blade V7
430 Points ∼5% +1%
Lenovo Moto G4
843 Points ∼10% +99%
OnePlus X
1975 Points ∼23% +366%
Huawei P9 Lite
818 Points ∼10% +93%
LG G5
4807 Points ∼56% +1034%
Memory (ordenar por valor)
LG X Cam
600 Points ∼16%
ZTE Blade V7
790 Points ∼21% +32%
Lenovo Moto G4
652 Points ∼17% +9%
OnePlus X
662 Points ∼17% +10%
Huawei P9 Lite
1346 Points ∼35% +124%
LG G5
1478 Points ∼38% +146%
System (ordenar por valor)
LG X Cam
1178 Points ∼18%
ZTE Blade V7
1188 Points ∼18% +1%
Lenovo Moto G4
1499 Points ∼23% +27%
OnePlus X
2225 Points ∼34% +89%
Huawei P9 Lite
2438 Points ∼37% +107%
LG G5
2925 Points ∼44% +148%
Overall (ordenar por valor)
LG X Cam
232 Points ∼7%
ZTE Blade V7
249 Points ∼8% +7%
Lenovo Moto G4
295 Points ∼9% +27%
OnePlus X
1252 Points ∼38% +440%
Huawei P9 Lite
1197 Points ∼36% +416%
LG G5
2079 Points ∼63% +796%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (ordenar por valor)
LG X Cam (Chrome Version 52)
18.343 Points ∼6%
ZTE Blade V7 (Chrome Version 50)
18.19 Points ∼6% -1%
Lenovo Moto G4 (Chrome 51)
22.314 Points ∼7% +22%
OnePlus X (Chrome 46)
28 Points ∼9% +53%
Huawei P9 Lite (Chrome 50.0.2661.89)
29.03 Points ∼9% +58%
LG G5 (Chrome 49)
49.7 Points ∼16% +171%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
LG X Cam
12958.3 ms * ∼22%
ZTE Blade V7 (Chrome Version 50)
13761.1 ms * ∼23% -6%
Lenovo Moto G4 (Chrome 51)
10813 ms * ∼18% +17%
OnePlus X (Chrome 46)
7264.1 ms * ∼12% +44%
Huawei P9 Lite (Chrome 50.0.2661.89)
9396.5 ms * ∼16% +27%
LG G5 (Chrome 49)
3461.1 ms * ∼6% +73%
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
LG X Cam (Chrome Version 52)
2752 Points ∼6%
ZTE Blade V7 (Chrome Version 50)
2689 Points ∼5% -2%
Lenovo Moto G4 (Chrome 51)
3402 Points ∼7% +24%
OnePlus X (Chrome 46)
4810 Points ∼10% +75%
Huawei P9 Lite (Chrome 50.0.2661.89)
4756 Points ∼10% +73%
LG G5 (Chrome 49)
9731 Points ∼20% +254%

Leyenda

 
LG X Cam Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V7 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto G4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus X Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P9 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG G5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.
 41.2 °C38.5 °C37.8 °C 
 41.6 °C39.1 °C38.7 °C 
 40.1 °C40.3 °C39.7 °C 
Máximo: 41.6 °C
Médio: 39.7 °C
36.5 °C38.1 °C37.9 °C
36.7 °C39 °C38.9 °C
37.4 °C40.3 °C40.4 °C
Máximo: 40.4 °C
Médio: 38.4 °C
Conector de corriente  39 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.832.432.82531.731.331.73129.231.729.24035.62635.6503639.4366331.936.231.98027.828.627.810025.125.425.112523.121.323.116025.723.325.720022.222.522.225023.822.423.83153321.33340041.818.441.850051.217.551.263056.917.556.980064.217.264.2100072.416.872.4125075.817.375.8160073.317.473.3200072.716.672.7250071.217.371.2315069.117.669.1400069.317.669.3500073.117.773.1630076.617.476.6800078.417.778.4100007317.9731250063.818.163.81600060.618.160.6SPL8529.885N56.91.356.9median 64.2LG X Cammedian 17.7median 64.2Delta171.61733.63732.433.638.339.631.338.33038.431.73031.338.82631.335.840.839.435.831.632.636.231.626.12728.626.127.825.325.427.825.124.221.325.124.225.423.324.222.921.622.522.922.219.222.422.224.619.821.324.631.620.518.431.645.628.917.545.658.441.817.558.467.752.117.267.771.956.316.871.973.457.117.373.472.156.217.472.173.856.416.673.873.957.317.373.97659.217.67676.859.717.676.874.156.717.774.172.153.717.472.17152.517.77174.455.617.974.473.754.718.173.761.542.118.161.585.368.329.885.357.320.51.357.3median 71ZTE Blade V7median 52.5median 17.7median 7117.914.11.617.93237.832.4323430.431.33430.628.931.730.630.831.52630.834.830.339.434.828.328.936.228.330.529.328.630.528.525.825.428.533.125.921.333.145.934.823.345.951.942.122.551.956.146.422.456.158.750.621.358.76354.218.46366.85817.566.870.761.817.570.772.16517.272.175.567.216.875.574.866.117.374.875.867.117.475.877.468.416.677.47869.417.37876.867.517.676.87566.417.67571.462.417.771.470.761.917.470.770.360.417.770.367.158.317.967.163.754.118.163.758.651.418.158.686.677.829.886.666.439.21.366.4median 70.3Lenovo Moto G4median 60.4median 17.7median 70.38.19.61.68.140.731.832.440.732.731.831.332.730.834.231.730.831.830.42631.836.633.139.436.633.330.936.233.332.42528.632.429.624.325.429.631.523.921.331.536.324.323.336.344.329.822.544.352.236.622.452.257.341.721.357.362.747.118.462.764.950.117.564.96752.517.56769.153.917.269.17254.216.8727454.217.37475.755.317.475.775.756.916.675.776.157.817.376.17757.917.67779.159.517.679.180.161.117.780.178.359.417.478.377.358.417.777.378.859.717.978.872.953.518.172.956.83718.156.888.469.529.888.473.724.21.373.7median 72Huawei P9 Litemedian 53.9median 17.7median 7211.19.91.611.1hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
LG X Cam audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.97 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 38.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 10% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (35.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

ZTE Blade V7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.33 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 46.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 11% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Lenovo Moto G4 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.59 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Huawei P9 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.42 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.05 / 0.22 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.64 / 1.38 / 1.43 Watt
Carga midlight 3.99 / 4.49 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
LG X Cam
2500 mAh
ZTE Blade V7
2540 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4
3000 mAh
OnePlus X
 mAh
Huawei P9 Lite
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
2%
-34%
23%
-26%
Idle Minimum *
0.64
0.73
-14%
0.65
-2%
0.6
6%
0.73
-14%
Idle Average *
1.38
0.92
33%
1.89
-37%
0.91
34%
2.09
-51%
Idle Maximum *
1.43
0.93
35%
1.92
-34%
1.12
22%
2.11
-48%
Load Average *
3.99
4.47
-12%
5.28
-32%
3.04
24%
4.15
-4%
Load Maximum *
4.49
5.96
-33%
7.45
-66%
3.2
29%
5.05
-12%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Navegando con WLAN v1.3
7h 37min
LG X Cam
2500 mAh
ZTE Blade V7
2540 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4
3000 mAh
OnePlus X
 mAh
Huawei P9 Lite
3000 mAh
Duración de Batería
14%
53%
20%
32%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
457
519
14%
698
53%
549
20%
604
32%

Pro

+ buen manejo
+ panel Full HD IPS de alto contraste
+ ranura SD
+ NFC
+ doble módulo de cámara...

Contra

- ...que podría haber sido de mayor calidad
- carcasa de plástico (tacto)
- 2 GB de RAM
- 16 GB de ROM
- altavoz
- sin lector de huellas
- módulo WiFi lento
LG X Cam. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de LG Alemania

El modelo de gama media LG X Cam puntúa en nuestro test con un panel Full HD IPS de alto contraste y su buen manejo. Está bien construido, pero sólo ofrece una carcasa de plástico de tacto barato para este nivel de precios - la competencia de gama media hecha de vidrio (OnePlus X) o metales (ZTE Blade V7) dan una impresión de mucha más calidad.

Comparado con la competencia, el LG X Cam ofrece demasiado poco para su precio actual de unos 280 Euros. Sin embargo, podría ser una alternativa interesante para algunos compradores cuando el mercado se desarrolle correspondientemente (reducción de precio) - pero no realmente a nuestro parecer con este precio actual.

El punto fuerte del dispositivo y la característica que le da nombre es su doble cámara trasera, compuesta por un módulo estándar (75°) y un gran angular de 120°. La calidad de la fotografía de sendas cámaras es buena, pero claramente inferior a la del LG G5 (que también trae una doble cámara) - a un PVR de 300 Euros, LG ciertamente podría haber instalado una lente igual a la de su dispositivo insignia siendo como es el único gancho comercial de su smartphone de gama media.

También hay que hacer sacrificios en el rendimiento del procesador. El SoC MediaTek del LG X Cam no puede competir con el rendimiento de otros smartphones de gama media - lo mismo pasa con la velocidad de la memoria flash eMMC de 16 GB. Lo que es más, la calidad de sonido del altavoz instalado en el LG X Cam no es particularmente convincente.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

LG X Cam - 08/23/AM v5.1
Marcus Herbrich

Acabado
77%
Teclado
70 / 75 → 93%
Ratón
87%
Conectividad
40 / 60 → 66%
Peso
95%
Battería
90%
Pantalla
82%
Rendimiento de juegos
15 / 63 → 23%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
32 / 70 → 46%
Temperatura
86%
Ruido
100%
Audio
53 / 91 → 58%
Cámara
72%
Médio
69%
82%
Smartphone - media ponderada

Pricecompare

> Español - página inicial > Análisis > Breve análisis del Smartphone LG X Cam
Marcus Herbrich, 2016-08-27 (Update: 2016-08-27)