Breve análisis del portátil HP EliteBook 820 G4 (7500U, Full HD)

Name: HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET
Brand: HP

Con aguante. El último EliteBook de 12.5 pulgadas viene con procesador Kaby Lake asegurando con ello una mayor duración de batería. También nos han gustado otras características: pantalla IPS, SSD NVMe , 16 GB de RAM y modem LTE. Sin embargo el dispositivo tiene también algunos puntos débiles.

Sascha Mölck, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (traducido por Fernando Alvarez Ude), Published 03/02/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Business Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows

Dispositivo de pruebas cortesía de notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET (EliteBook 820 Serie)

Procesador

Intel Core i7-7500U 2 x 2.7 - 3.5 GHz, Kaby Lake

Adaptador gráfico

Intel HD Graphics 620, Núcleo: 1000 MHz, Single-Channel, 21.20.16.4541

Memoría

16 GB

, DDR4-2400, Single-Channel, dos ranuras RAM (una usada)

pantalla

12.50 pulgadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels 176 PPI, Chi Mei, IPS, lustroso: no

Placa base

Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH

Disco duro

Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512, 512 GB

, 430 GB libre

Tarjeta de sonido

Conexant

Conexiones

3 USB 3.0, 1 VGA, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Conexiones: audio combo, Card Reader: SD, 1 eSata, 1 Lector de Huellas Digitales, Brightness Sensor, TPM 2.0

Equipamento de red

Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, HP lt4120 Snapdragon X$ LTE, LTE, GPS

Tamaño

Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 18.9 x 310 x 218.9

Battería

49 Wh, 4250 mAh Litio-Ion, 11.55 V

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Características adicionales

Altavoces: Stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, Luz de Teclado: si, Microsoft Office 365 (versión de prueba), 36 Meses Garantía

Peso

1.26 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 296 g

Precio

2099 Euro

Enlaces

HP Pagina de inicio
EliteBook 820 (Series)

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

todas las especificaciónes

Size Comparison

Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 HP EliteBook 820 G3 HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET Dell Latitude 12 E7270 Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F6007RGE DIN A4 ❌

left: security lock slot, VGA out, USB 3.0 (Type-A), Smartcard reader

right: USB 3.1 Gen 1 (Type-C), Displayport, audio combo, USB 3.0 (Type-A), memory card reader (SD), Gigabit Ethernet, docking port, SIM card slot, power-in

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 12 E7270	130.5 MB/s +68%
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET	77.8 MB/s
HP EliteBook 820 G3	73.7 MB/s -5%
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138	73.3 MB/s -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F6007RGE	63.2 MB/s -19%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA	54.2 MB/s -30%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Latitude 12 E7270	202.6 MB/s +134%
HP EliteBook 820 G3	86.9 MB/s 0%
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET	86.6 MB/s
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138	85.8 MB/s -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F6007RGE	83.5 MB/s -4%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA	81.8 MB/s -6%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (jseb)	474 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (jseb)	506 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Broadcom 802.11ac	397 MBit/s
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Broadcom 802.11ac	570 MBit/s


282 cd/m²	316 cd/m²	320 cd/m²
288 cd/m²	326 cd/m²	324 cd/m²
265 cd/m²	303 cd/m²	312 cd/m²

Temperatura del cuarto

Chi Mei tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 326 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 304 cd/m² Minimum: 15.5 cd/m²
iluminación: 81 %
Brillo con batería: 328 cd/m²
Contraste: 1124:1 (Negro: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.49 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.16 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
65% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
46.04% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
44.45% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.32

Download Archivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET IPS, 1920x1080, 12.50	HP EliteBook 820 G3 TN LED, 1366x768, 12.50	HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA TN LED, 1366x768, 12.50	Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F6007RGE IPS, 1920x1080, 12.50	Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30	Dell Latitude 12 E7270 IPS LED, 1920x1080, 12.50	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz IPS, 2304x1440, 12.00
Display		-12%	7%	1%	52%	-11%	48%
Display P3 Coverage	44.45	38.9 -12%	47.15 6%	44.71 1%	67.9 53%	39.7 -11%	66.8 50%
sRGB Coverage	65.5	58.5 -11%	71 8%	66.1 1%	98 50%	59.2 -10%	95.4 46%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	46.04	40.2 -13%	48.71 6%	46.23 0%	69.8 52%	41.07 -11%	68 48%
Response Times		-39%	-18%	1%	-14%	-11%	-18%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	35 ?(16, 19)	58 ?(24.8, 33.2) -66%	50 ?(27, 23) -43%	32.8 ?(15.6, 17.2) 6%	42 ?(18, 24) -20%	38.4 ?(17.2, 21.2) -10%	41.2 ?(15.6, 25.6) -18%
Response Time Black / White *	26 ?(7, 19)	29.2 ?(12, 17.2) -12%	24 ?(20, 4) 8%	27.2 ?(12.4, 14.8) -5%	28 ?(7, 21) -8%	28.8 ?(10.8, 18) -11%	30.4 ?(6.8, 23.6) -17%
PWM Frequency					217 ?(40)
Screen		-33%	-24%	4%	13%	-12%	26%
Brightness middle	326	244 -25%	241 -26%	337 3%	300 -8%	353 8%	387 19%
Brightness	304	240 -21%	240 -21%	322 6%	280 -8%	334 10%	358 18%
Brightness Distribution	81	84 4%	83 2%	91 12%	87 7%	91 12%	88 9%
Black Level *	0.29	0.6 -107%	0.54 -86%	0.32 -10%	0.31 -7%	0.47 -62%	0.47 -62%
Contrast	1124	407 -64%	446 -60%	1053 -6%	968 -14%	751 -33%	823 -27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.49	9 -39%	8.04 -24%	5.71 12%	4.9 24%	7.79 -20%	1.6 75%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	15.95	15.73 1%	13.9 13%	15.39 4%	8.91 44%	15.19 5%	4 75%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.16	9.48 -54%	9.52 -55%	5.15 16%	6.69 -9%	7.38 -20%	1 84%
Gamma	2.32 ^95%	2.44 ^90%	2.42 ^91%	2.38 ^92%	2.33 ^94%	2.43 ^91%	2.26 ^97%
CCT	7575 ^86%	11116 ^58%	11362 ^57%	6881 ^94%	6487 ^100%	6158 ^106%	6680 ^97%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	42	37.18 -11%	45.03 7%	42.38 1%	63 50%	37.72 -10%	61.6 47%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	65	58.63 -10%	71.12 9%	65.62 1%	98 51%	58.87 -9%	82.2 26%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)		-28% / -29%	-12% / -17%	2% / 3%	17% / 17%	-11% / -11%	19% / 25%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 17924 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 3846000) Hz.

Tiempos de respuesta del display

ℹ

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.

↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
26 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↗ 7 ms subida
26 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↘ 19 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 57 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21.5 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
35 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↗ 16 ms subida
35 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↘ 19 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 42 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (33.7 ms).

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

7819

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

11385

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

5601

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

23.21 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

3.66 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.65 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.7 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

23.86 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

329 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

139 Points

ayuda

... comparado con

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Geekbench 3 | Geekbench 4.0 | JetStream 1.1

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET Intel Core i7-7500U	139 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F6007RGE Intel Core i7-6500U	128 Points -8%
Dell Latitude 12 E7270 Intel Core i5-6300U	124 Points -11%
HP EliteBook 820 G3 Intel Core i5-6300U	123 Points -12%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	91 Points -35%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	90 Points -35%
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 Intel Core i7-6500U	84 Points -40%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Pro A10-8700B	70 Points -50%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET Intel Core i7-7500U	329 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F6007RGE Intel Core i7-6500U	324 Points -2%
HP EliteBook 820 G3 Intel Core i5-6300U	311 Points -5%
Dell Latitude 12 E7270 Intel Core i5-6300U	311 Points -5%
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 Intel Core i7-6500U	288 Points -12%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	218 Points -34%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Pro A10-8700B	192 Points -42%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET Intel Core i7-7500U	1.65 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F6007RGE Intel Core i7-6500U	1.47 Points -11%
Dell Latitude 12 E7270 Intel Core i5-6300U	1.42 Points -14%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	1 Points -39%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	0.95 Points -42%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Pro A10-8700B	0.82 Points -50%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET Intel Core i7-7500U	3.66 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F6007RGE Intel Core i7-6500U	3.57 Points -2%
Dell Latitude 12 E7270 Intel Core i5-6300U	3.47 Points -5%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	2.35 Points -36%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	2.29 Points -37%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Pro A10-8700B	2.29 Points -37%

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET Intel Core i7-7500U	3234 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F6007RGE Intel Core i7-6500U	2956 Points -9%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Pro A10-8700B	950 Points -71%
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET Intel Core i7-7500U	7216 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F6007RGE Intel Core i7-6500U	6395 Points -11%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Pro A10-8700B	2728 Points -62%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET Intel Core i7-7500U	4046 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET Intel Core i7-7500U	7671 Points

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET Intel Core i7-7500U	242.4 Points
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 Intel Core i7-6500U	220 Points -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F6007RGE Intel Core i7-6500U	217.3 Points -10%
Dell Latitude 12 E7270 Intel Core i5-6300U	210.7 Points -13%
HP EliteBook 820 G3 Intel Core i5-6300U	188 Points -22%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	143 Points -41%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	130.7 Points -46%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Pro A10-8700B	111.2 Points -54%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Pro A10-8700B	66.4 Points -73%

PCMark 7 Score		5376 puntos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3660 puntos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		4631 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4824 puntos
ayuda

... comparado con

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	3660 Points
Dell Latitude 12 E7270 HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Liteon L8H-256V2G	3420 Points -7%
HP EliteBook 820 G3 HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	3400 Points -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F6007RGE HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Liteonit LCH-512V2S	3284 Points -10%
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ512G8NY	3271 Points -11%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA Radeon R6 (Carrizo), Pro A10-8700B, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630	2706 Points -26%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256	2550 Points -30%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	4824 Points
HP EliteBook 820 G3 HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	4581 Points -5%
Dell Latitude 12 E7270 HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Liteon L8H-256V2G	4395 Points -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F6007RGE HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Liteonit LCH-512V2S	4341 Points -10%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA Radeon R6 (Carrizo), Pro A10-8700B, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630	3691 Points -23%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256	3550 Points -26%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512

Sequential Read: 1315 MB/s

Sequential Write: 594 MB/s

512K Read: 661 MB/s

512K Write: 594 MB/s

4K Read: 42.87 MB/s

4K Write: 151.6 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 568 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 491.7 MB/s

	HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	HP EliteBook 820 G3 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F6007RGE Liteonit LCH-512V2S	Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ512G8NY	Dell Latitude 12 E7270 Liteon L8H-256V2G	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Apple SSD AP0256
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		23%	-44%	-48%	-50%	-29%
Read Seq	1315	1255 -5%	499.6 -62%	518 -61%	498.4 -62%	754 -43%
Write Seq	594	1240 109%	403 -32%	423.3 -29%	286.7 -52%	638 7%
Read 512	661	1131 71%	322.9 -51%	414.8 -37%		616 -7%
Write 512	594	811 37%	372.4 -37%	379.9 -36%		678 14%
Read 4k	42.87	51 19%	27.22 -37%	21.17 -51%	24.89 -42%	14.6 -66%
Write 4k	151.6	134.1 -12%	83.6 -45%	86.3 -43%	88 -42%	20.5 -86%
Read 4k QD32	568	549 -3%	316.5 -44%	227.3 -60%	280.5 -51%	464 -18%
Write 4k QD32	491.7	343.9 -30%	273.1 -44%	174.7 -64%	241.9 -51%	315 -36%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		7375 puntos
3DMark 11 Performance		1645 puntos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		56060 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		6084 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		822 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		370 puntos
ayuda

... comparado con

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), AMD Pro A10-8700B	1767 Points +17%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), AMD Pro A10-8700B	1432 Points -5%
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	1515 Points
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	1377 Points -9%
Dell Latitude 12 E7270 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U	1307 Points -14%
HP EliteBook 820 G3 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U	1280 Points -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F6007RGE Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	1268 Points -16%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	1186 Points -22%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	7618 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F6007RGE Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	6287 Points -17%
Dell Latitude 12 E7270 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U	6248 Points -18%
HP EliteBook 820 G3 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U	6131 Points -20%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	6078 Points -20%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), AMD Pro A10-8700B	4717 Points -38%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), AMD Pro A10-8700B	983 Points +11%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), AMD Pro A10-8700B	769 Points -13%
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	886 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F6007RGE Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	791 Points -11%
HP EliteBook 820 G3 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U	755 Points -15%
Dell Latitude 12 E7270 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U	748 Points -16%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	735 Points -17%

	bajo	medio	alto	ultra
Tomb Raider (2013)	70.3	36.2	21.3	10.4
BioShock Infinite (2013)	41.9	25.9	21.3	6.9
Battlefield 4 (2013)	33	26.9	17.4	6.1

Ruido

Ocioso		30.7 / 30.7 / 30.7 dB(A)
Carga		35.3 / 33.7 dB(A)

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30.7 dB(A)

	HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620	HP EliteBook 820 G3 6300U, HD Graphics 520	HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA Pro A10-8700B, Radeon R6 (Carrizo)	Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F6007RGE 6500U, HD Graphics 520	Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 6500U, HD Graphics 520	Dell Latitude 12 E7270 6300U, HD Graphics 520
Noise		2%	-2%	2%	-10%	4%
off / environment *	30.7	29.2 5%	28.9 6%	29 6%	31.2 -2%	28.9 6%
Idle Minimum *	30.7	29.2 5%	30.5 1%	29 6%	31.2 -2%	28.9 6%
Idle Average *	30.7	29.2 5%	30.5 1%	29 6%	31.2 -2%	28.9 6%
Idle Maximum *	30.7	29.2 5%	30.5 1%	29 6%	31.2 -2%	28.9 6%
Load Average *	35.3	35.6 -1%	38.2 -8%	35.1 1%	43.3 -23%	31.3 11%
Load Maximum *	33.7	37 -10%	38.4 -14%	37.8 -12%	43.3 -28%	37.6 -12%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.

Inactivo


36.2 °C	37 °C	30.7 °C
32.1 °C	33.2 °C	29.2 °C
27.8 °C	27.1 °C	27.6 °C

Máximo: 37 °C
Médio: 31.2 °C


31.4 °C	38.9 °C	34.6 °C
29.8 °C	31.2 °C	30 °C
27.1 °C	27.5 °C	28 °C

Máximo: 38.9 °C
Médio: 30.9 °C

Conector de corriente 34.9 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 22 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.8 °C / 82 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+0.5 °C / 0.9 F).

	HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620	HP EliteBook 820 G3 6300U, HD Graphics 520	HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA Pro A10-8700B, Radeon R6 (Carrizo)	Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F6007RGE 6500U, HD Graphics 520	Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 6500U, HD Graphics 520	Dell Latitude 12 E7270 6300U, HD Graphics 520	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 6Y30, HD Graphics 515
Heat		-9%	-29%	-27%	3%	-27%	-15%
Maximum Upper Side *	37	39.6 -7%	42.8 -16%	47.5 -28%	40.6 -10%	44.3 -20%	39 -5%
Maximum Bottom *	38.9	40.1 -3%	54.3 -40%	43.6 -12%	37 5%	52.6 -35%	44 -13%
Idle Upper Side *	26.3	29.4 -12%	33.2 -26%	34.9 -33%	24.5 7%	32.3 -23%	32 -22%
Idle Bottom *	27	30.6 -13%	36.5 -35%	35.9 -33%	24.9 8%	35.1 -30%	32 -19%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de corriente

Off / Standby	0.44 / 0.49 Watt
Ocioso	2.7 / 4.8 / 6.6 Watt
Carga	28.5 / 29 Watt


Clave: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620	HP EliteBook 820 G3 6300U, HD Graphics 520	HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA Pro A10-8700B, Radeon R6 (Carrizo)	Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F6007RGE 6500U, HD Graphics 520	Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 6500U, HD Graphics 520	Dell Latitude 12 E7270 6300U, HD Graphics 520	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 6Y30, HD Graphics 515
Power Consumption		-14%	-70%	-19%	-37%	-18%	17%
Idle Minimum *	2.7	3.5 -30%	5.4 -100%	3.5 -30%	3.2 -19%	3.8 -41%	2.7 -0%
Idle Average *	4.8	5.4 -13%	7.5 -56%	5.5 -15%	7.8 -63%	6.7 -40%	2.7 44%
Idle Maximum *	6.6	6.2 6%	13 -97%	6.7 -2%	8.7 -32%	7.2 -9%	7.2 -9%
Load Average *	28.5	27.3 4%	41.2 -45%	28.9 -1%	42.2 -48%	27.2 5%	22 23%
Load Maximum *	29	39.5 -36%	44.7 -54%	42.1 -45%	35.7 -23%	30.2 -4%	20.5 29%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería

Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)		22h 26min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38)		9h 26min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		8h 52min
Carga (máximo brillo)		3h 25min

	HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 49 Wh	HP EliteBook 820 G3 6300U, HD Graphics 520, 44 Wh	HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA Pro A10-8700B, Radeon R6 (Carrizo), 44 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F6007RGE 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 46 Wh	Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 52 Wh	Dell Latitude 12 E7270 6300U, HD Graphics 520, 55 Wh	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 41.4 Wh
Duración de Batería		-28%	-55%	-27%	-39%	-19%	-1%
Reader / Idle	1346	826 -39%	553 -59%	953 -29%		1050 -22%
H.264	532	495 -7%	258 -52%	466 -12%			512 -4%
WiFi v1.3	566	373 -34%	281 -50%	501 -11%	345 -39%	508 -10%	501 -11%
Load	205	144 -30%	83 -60%	92 -55%		153 -25%	231 13%

Pro

+ Pantalla IPS

+ Resolución Full HD

+ Chasis robusto y bien fabricado

+ Buenos dispositivos de entrada

+ SSD NVMe

+ Modem LTE

+ Buena duración de batería

+ 3 años de garantía

Contra

- Cuando el ventilador está en funcionamiento se escucha un ligero silbido.

- Precio elevado

- No se usa el Turbo de la CPU cuando se funciona en multi-thread

Análisis: HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET. Modelo de prueba cedido por Notebooksbilliger.de

Incluso aunque el HP EliteBook 820 G4 sea solo una actualización Kaby Lake, podría resultar interesante para los poseedores del predecesor. Sin embargo, esto no es solo por el mayor rendimiento de Kaby Lake ante Skylake.

Una duración de batería significativamente mayor hace (aún más) atractivo este ordenador.

Independientemente de la carga de trabajo, el ordenador se mantiene en buena temperatura y funciona de forma silenciosa la mayor parte del tiempo. Esto último es cierto mientras que el ventilador no funcione o lo haga a baja velocidad. De otra forma se escucha un ligero silbido. Esto no debería ocurrir en dispositivos de este precio; más aún después de que esto fuera ya criticado en su predecesor.

El rápido NVMe-SSD asegura una buena respuesta del sistema. Es posible reemplazar el SSD. Esto requiere extraer la parte inferior del portátil - lo que no requiere mucho esfuerzo. El teclado y la carcasa no han cambiado: HP ofrece la calidad habitual.

Apenas podemos decir cosas buenas de las pantallas de los portátiles de negocios de HP. Sin embargo esta vez las cosas son distintas: HP ha incluido un panel IPS brillante, con contraste y buenos ángulos de visualización. Hasta los colores son muy decentes sin realizar ninguna calibración.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET - 2017-02-24 02/24/2017 v6^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Acabado

91 / 98 → 93%

Teclado

87%

Ratón

89%

Conectividad

63 / 80 → 79%

Peso

72 / 35-78 → 86%

Battería

91%

Pantalla

85%

Rendimiento de juegos

55 / 68 → 81%

Rendimiento de la Aplicación

89 / 87 → 100%

Temperatura

94 / 91 → 100%

Ruido

93%

Audio

64 / 91 → 70%

Cámara

40 / 85 → 47%

Médio

78%

88%

Subnotebook - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del portátil HP EliteBook 820 G4 (7500U, Full HD)

Sascha Mölck, 2017-03- 2 (Update: 2017-03- 3)

Breve análisis del portátil HP EliteBook 820 G4 (7500U, Full HD)

Size Comparison

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Tiempos de respuesta del display

HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET audio analysis

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare