Notebookcheck Logo

Breve análisis del Convertible HP Pavilion x2 12

Asequible, pero no perfecto. HP no cobra ni 700 Euros por su nuevo desmontable Windows, que trae un procesador Core-m, un digitalizador y un teclado anclable. Pero ¿cómo queda el dispositivo comparado con el mucho más caro Surface Pro 4 de Microsoft?
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng (Pavilion x2 Serie)
Procesador
Intel Core m3-6Y30 2 x 0.9 - 2.2 GHz, Skylake
Adaptador gráfico
Intel HD Graphics 515, Núcleo: 850 MHz, Memoría: 1866 MHz, 20.19.15.4377
Memoría
4 GB 
, Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1866, soldado
pantalla
12.00 pulgadas 3:2, 1920 x 1280 pixels 192 PPI, capacitva, native pen support, LG Philips LGD04A5, IPS, retroiluminación LED, lustroso: si, detachable screen
Placa base
Intel Skylake-Y Premium PCH
Disco duro
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G, 128 GB 
Tarjeta de sonido
Intel Skylake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, Audio Conexiones: clavija headset 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD
Equipamento de red
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 19 x 300 x 220
Battería
33 Wh Litio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 2.0 Megapixels
Características adicionales
Altavoces: altavoces Estéreo B&O, Teclado: Chiclet, Luz de Teclado: no, adaptador de corriente 45W, digitalizador activo, HP Support Assistant, HP Recovery Manager, 12 Meses Garantía, fanless
Peso
1.47 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 315 g
Precio
700 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

300 mm 220 mm 19 mm 1.5 kg293 mm 224 mm 14.5 mm 1.1 kg291 mm 201 mm 11 mm 1.3 kg292 mm 202 mm 8.5 mm 1.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Broadcom 802.11ac
570 MBit/s
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR
Realtek RTL8723BS
34.95 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Broadcom 802.11ac
397 MBit/s
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR
Realtek RTL8723BS
37.44 MBit/s
317
cd/m²
311
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
309
cd/m²
314
cd/m²
303
cd/m²
306
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
295
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
LG Philips LGD04A5 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 317 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 307.7 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²
iluminación: 93 %
Brillo con batería: 314 cd/m²
Contraste: 654:1 (Negro: 0.48 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.12 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
71.74% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
46.81% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
52.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
53.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.35
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng
LG Philips LGD04A5, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.00
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Samsung SDC3853, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.30
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Panasonic VVX12T041N00, IPS, 2160x1440, 12.00
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
Samsung L_QLLTN120QL01L01, IPS, 2160x1440, 12.00
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N
Digital Flat Panel (NoName), sAMOLED, 2160x1440, 12.10
Display
30%
27%
32%
Display P3 Coverage
53.2
67.5
27%
65.5
23%
68.1
28%
sRGB Coverage
72.4
96.6
33%
96.1
33%
97.4
35%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
52.9
69
30%
66.9
26%
70.2
33%
Response Times
-18%
11%
31%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
38 ?(17, 21)
46 ?(17.2, 28.8)
-21%
20 ?(5, 15, detail 5 schraffiert)
47%
30 ?(11, 19)
21%
Response Time Black / White *
27 ?(14, 13)
31 ?(6, 25.2)
-15%
34 ?(15, 19, PWM@100% mit/ohne PSU)
-26%
16 ?(4.4, 11.6)
41%
PWM Frequency
50 ?(50)
1000 ?(100)
200 ?(18)
Screen
40%
10%
13%
224%
Brightness middle
314
389.2
24%
345
10%
341
9%
363
16%
Brightness
308
392
27%
328
6%
318
3%
378
23%
Brightness Distribution
93
92
-1%
91
-2%
87
-6%
90
-3%
Black Level *
0.48
0.27
44%
0.38
21%
0.36
25%
0.03
94%
Contrast
654
1441
120%
908
39%
947
45%
12100
1750%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.12
3.61
41%
8.4
-37%
6
2%
4.8
22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.92
11.9
-9%
6.91
37%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.1
3.8
38%
4.3
30%
8.12
-33%
5.04
17%
Gamma
2.35 94%
2.16 102%
2.63 84%
2.23 99%
2.57 86%
CCT
7391 88%
5969 109%
7368 88%
7011 93%
7255 90%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
46.81
63
35%
62
32%
63.4
35%
73
56%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
71.74
97
35%
97.4
36%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
17% / 30%
16% / 14%
25% / 20%
224% / 224%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
27 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 14 ms subida
↘ 13 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 63 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21.6 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
38 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 17 ms subida
↘ 21 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 49 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (33.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 18080 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 3846000) Hz.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel Core i5-6200U
114 Points +24%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
Intel Core m5-6Y54
99 Points +8%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng
Intel Core m3-6Y30
92 Points
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
91 Points -1%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
90 Points -2%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
88 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N
Intel Core m3-6Y30
86 Points -7%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel Core i5-6200U
289 Points +34%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
218 Points +1%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng
Intel Core m3-6Y30
216 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
206 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N
Intel Core m3-6Y30
204 Points -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
Intel Core m5-6Y54
200 Points -7%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
Intel Core m5-6Y54
1.06 Points +2%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng
Intel Core m3-6Y30
1.04 Points
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
1 Points -4%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
0.95 Points -9%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
0.98 Points -6%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng
Intel Core m3-6Y30
2.4 Points
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
2.35 Points -2%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
2.29 Points -5%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
2.27 Points -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
Intel Core m5-6Y54
2.08 Points -13%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0
Pass 1
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng
Intel Core m3-6Y30
77 fps
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
76.8 fps 0%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
69 (61.3min - 76.8max) fps -10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
Intel Core m5-6Y54
67.5 fps -12%
Pass 2
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng
Intel Core m3-6Y30
14.26 fps
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
14.15 fps -1%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
13 (11.7min - 14.2max) fps -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
Intel Core m5-6Y54
12.3 fps -14%
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6088
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
7321
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
3477
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
27.26 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
2.4 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.04 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
33.03 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
216 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
92 Points
ayuda
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Apple SSD AP0256
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
22%
35%
45%
123%
Read Seq
477.3
663
39%
518
9%
497.9
4%
754
58%
Write Seq
184.3
158.2
-14%
199.9
8%
153.5
-17%
638
246%
Read 512
226.2
313.1
38%
374.9
66%
401.2
77%
616
172%
Write 512
176.2
158.2
-10%
201
14%
154.5
-12%
678
285%
Read 4k
21.12
30.14
43%
29.3
39%
36.2
71%
14.6
-31%
Write 4k
57.9
68
17%
76.8
33%
95.5
65%
20.5
-65%
Read 4k QD32
136.4
243.7
79%
272
99%
389.5
186%
464
240%
Write 4k QD32
173.2
149.2
-14%
197.1
14%
154
-11%
315
82%
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
Tasa de Transferencia Mínima: 180.8 MB/s
Tasa de Transferencia Máxima: 393.6 MB/s
Tasa de Transferencia Promedio: 382.9 MB/s
Tiempo de Acceso: 0.1 ms
Velocidad de Ráfagas: 37.9 MB/s
Uso de CPU: 7.7 %
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
3281 Points +16%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
2831 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
2733 Points -3%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256
2550 Points -10%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
2426 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
2217 Points -22%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
3996 Points +6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
3837 Points +2%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
3773 Points
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256
3550 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
3311 Points -12%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
3186 Points -16%
PCMark 7 Score
4275 puntos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2831 puntos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3198 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3773 puntos
ayuda
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1428 Points +26%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
1206 Points +6%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
1133 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
1014 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
980 Points -14%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
7307 Points +18%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
6597 Points +7%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
6178 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
5259 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
4760 Points -23%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
810 Points +9%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
740 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
697 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
589 Points -20%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
7530 puntos
3DMark 11 Performance
1260 puntos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
41366 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
4330 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
671 puntos
ayuda
bajo medio alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 48 23.8 21.9
Battlefield 4 (2013) 34.3 23.2 15.2
Dirt Rally (2015) 57.8 16 12.5
Carga Máx.
 30.8 °C35.3 °C44.8 °C 
 30.8 °C35.5 °C49.6 °C 
 34.6 °C39.1 °C44.1 °C 
Máximo: 49.6 °C
Médio: 38.3 °C
44.3 °C37 °C30.8 °C
46.5 °C36.6 °C31.5 °C
44.1 °C37.7 °C31.7 °C
Máximo: 46.5 °C
Médio: 37.8 °C
Conector de corriente  40.2 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 23.1 °C | Fluke 62 Max
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.6 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.5 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 44.1 °C / 111.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-16 °C / -28.8 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.533.32536.433.63138.241.64039.3405034.633.56334.934.98036.33510037.635.512536.637.316029.3312002935.125029.139.631527.947.840027.749.450026.150.563025.660.280024.364.5100024.165.312502461.1160023.456.120002364.5250022.962.5315022.859.4400022.957.150002363.8630023.564.9800022.562.31000022.6581250022.558.1160002254.9SPL36.374N2.832.1median 24median 58Delta2.48.535.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Pavilion x2 12-b000ngApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.45 / 0.52 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 5.3 / 8.2 / 9 Watt
Carga midlight 20.7 / 21.4 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.00
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
6200U, HD Graphics 520, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2, IPS, 2160x1440, 12.00
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
6Y54, HD Graphics 515, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2, IPS, 2160x1440, 12.00
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2304x1440, 12.00
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Lite-On CV1-8B128, sAMOLED, 2160x1440, 12.10
Power Consumption
-26%
-9%
27%
21%
Idle Minimum *
5.3
7.3
-38%
4
25%
2.7
49%
3.4
36%
Idle Average *
8.2
10
-22%
8.6
-5%
2.7
67%
8
2%
Idle Maximum *
9
10.15
-13%
9.3
-3%
7.2
20%
9
-0%
Load Average *
20.7
25.2
-22%
18.6
10%
22
-6%
12
42%
Load Maximum *
21.4
29.3
-37%
36.3
-70%
20.5
4%
16.1
25%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
7h 54min
WiFi Websurfing
4h 45min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 11min
Carga (máximo brillo)
1h 49min
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 33 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 38 Wh
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 37 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 41 Wh
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 41.4 Wh
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 39.5 Wh
Duración de Batería
55%
25%
56%
84%
95%
Reader / Idle
474
791
67%
640
35%
861
82%
1110
134%
H.264
311
468
50%
450
45%
512
65%
515
66%
WiFi v1.3
285
488
71%
321
13%
440
54%
501
76%
525
84%
Load
109
138
27%
112
3%
157
44%
231
112%

Pro

+ veloz WLAN (802.11ac)
+ teclado firme
+ digitalizador activo
+ brillante display IPS
+ decente rendimiento de aplicación
+ sin ventilador
+ precio justo

Contra

- limitada selección de puertos
- botones de touchpad esponjosos
- memoria limitada
- aguante de batería mediocre
- sin módulo WWAN
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Notebooksbilliger.
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Notebooksbilliger.

El HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng es un portátil 2-en-1 relativamente económico, que sigue pudiendo competir con los rivales más caros en muchos aspectos. Puntos fuertes del convertible son la bisagra del display, un teclado firme y un uso perfecto del Turbo Boost del procesador Core-m. El display tampoco es malo, aunque algunos rivales tienen resoluciones más altas. También es uno de los pocos dispositivos en este segmento sin parpadeo por PWM.

Encontramos algunos problemas durante este análisis, que afectan ligeramente a la impresión general. Si bien puedes seguir viviendo con la memoria limitada así como con la falta de un modelo LTE dado el precio, la magra selección de puertos – ni siquiera tiene un puerto USB 3.0 Type-A – es un fallo de diseño bastante molesto. Una capacidad de batería muy superior, quizá realizado con una batería secundaria dentro del teclado anclable, habría estado bien para el sistema en general.

Con todo, el Pavilion x2 12 sigue siendo una oferta justa por unos 700 Euros – pero el rendimiento no es lo bastante bueno para derrotar al caro Microsoft Surface Pro 4.

 

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng - 08/20/2016 v5.1(old)
Till Schönborn

Acabado
82 / 98 → 83%
Teclado
86%
Ratón
81%
Conectividad
39 / 80 → 49%
Peso
69 / 35-78 → 79%
Battería
80%
Pantalla
81%
Rendimiento de juegos
54 / 68 → 79%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
72 / 87 → 83%
Temperatura
85%
Ruido
100%
Audio
63 / 91 → 69%
Cámara
61 / 85 → 71%
Médio
73%
81%
Convertible - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Convertible HP Pavilion x2 12
Till Schönborn, 2016-08-27 (Update: 2016-08-27)