Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK (80TK003KGE)

Sebastian Bade (traducido por Francisco García), 09/25/AM

¡Compañero de plata! Lenovo presenta otro peso ligero de 14" equipado con procesador ULV y una Intel Iris graphics. Su intento de entrar en el sector premium no es un éxito total. Nuestro análisis exhaustivo revela por qué el subportátil de Lenovo falla y cómo lo hace el modelo de pruebas en nuestras pruebas.

Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK (Ideapad 500 Serie)
Procesador
Intel Core i5-6267U 2.9 GHz
Adaptador gráfico
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Núcleo: 300 - 1100 MHz, 20.19.15.4390
Memoría
8192 MB 
, DDR4, 1866 MHz, monocanal, 1 ranura (ocupada)
pantalla
14 pulgadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixels 157 PPI, NV140FHM-N41, a-Si TFT-LCD, IPS, LED, 262K, 6bit, antirreflejos, lustroso: no
Disco duro
Samsung MZYTY256HDHP, 256 GB 
, 2.5" SSD , 193 GB libre
Tarjeta de sonido
Realtek High Definition Audio
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Conexiones: stereo, Card Reader: MMC, SD, SDHC, SDXC
Equipamento de red
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 19.5 x 340 x 240
Battería
30 Wh, 4050 mAh Litio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p-HD
Características adicionales
Altavoces: Audio by HARMAN, Teclado: Chiclet, Luz de Teclado: si, McAfee LifeSafe, Lenovo Solution Center, 24 Meses Garantía
Peso
1.542 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 230 g
Precio
799 Euros

 

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
61 MB/s ∼100% +23%
HP Envy 13-d020ng
54 MB/s ∼89% +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
49.5 MB/s ∼81%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
27.9 MB/s ∼46% -44%
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
22.4 MB/s ∼37% -55%
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
15 MB/s ∼25% -70%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
85.7 MB/s ∼100% +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
83.4 MB/s ∼97%
HP Envy 13-d020ng
83 MB/s ∼97% 0%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
37.1 MB/s ∼43% -56%
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.3 MB/s ∼32% -67%
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
27.1 MB/s ∼32% -68%
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
372 MBit/s ∼100% +39%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
268 MBit/s ∼72%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
390 MBit/s ∼100% +34%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
291 MBit/s ∼75%
270
cd/m²
272
cd/m²
276
cd/m²
264
cd/m²
257
cd/m²
259
cd/m²
267
cd/m²
254
cd/m²
248
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 276 cd/m² Médio: 263 cd/m² Minimum: 4 cd/m²
iluminación: 90 %
Brillo con batería: 257 cd/m²
Contraste: 1071:1 (Negro: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.44 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.95 | - Ø
64% sRGB (Argyll) 40% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.29
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
NV140FHM-N41, 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
Chi Mei CMN14A7, 1920x1080, 14
Asus X302UV-FN016T
InfoVision M133NWN1 R3, 1366x768, 13.3
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
LG LP133WF2-SPL3, 1920x1080, 13.3
HP Envy 13-d020ng
AU Optronics AUO272D, 1920x1080, 13.3
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
LG Display LP133WF2-SPL3, 1920x1080, 13.3
Response Times
8%
6%
-12%
116%
3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
45
43
4%
42
7%
41
9%
34
24%
46
-2%
Response Time Black / White *
26
23
12%
23
12%
34.4
-32%
24
8%
24
8%
PWM Frequency
50
50
0%
208
316%
Screen
-49%
-20%
-22%
14%
-14%
Brightness
263
235
-11%
210
-20%
239
-9%
335
27%
247
-6%
Brightness Distribution
90
87
-3%
88
-2%
81
-10%
95
6%
87
-3%
Black Level *
0.24
0.44
-83%
0.5
-108%
0.38
-58%
0.25
-4%
0.43
-79%
Contrast
1071
566
-47%
436
-59%
650
-39%
1380
29%
581
-46%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.44
9.47
-74%
3.89
28%
5.95
-9%
4.94
9%
4.51
17%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.95
10.22
-159%
4.9
-24%
5.25
-33%
5.85
-48%
3.18
19%
Gamma
2.29 105%
2.34 103%
2.41 100%
2.42 99%
2.25 107%
2.43 99%
CCT
6896 94%
11451 57%
7860 83%
6736 96%
7105 91%
6743 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
40
39
-2%
46
15%
37.28
-7%
60
50%
37
-7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
64
57
-11%
73
14%
58.37
-9%
93
45%
58
-9%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
-21% / -37%
-7% / -12%
-17% / -20%
65% / 42%
-6% / -11%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Grayscale
Grayscale
ColorChecker
ColorChecker
Saturation Sweeps
Saturation Sweeps

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
26 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 7 ms subida
↘ 19 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 42 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (27.3 ms).
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
45 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 17 ms subida
↘ 28 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 64 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (44.3 ms).

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado 50 Hz60 % de brillo

La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 50 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 60 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM.

La frecuencia de 50 Hz es bajísima, por lo que el parpadeo puede causar fatiga visual y cefaleas cuando se usa mucho tiempo.

Comparación: 60 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 962 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 30860) Hz.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
DPC Latency
Intel Extreme Tuning Utility
Cinebench R10
Cinebench R10
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15
Jetstream 1.1
Jetstream 1.1
Octane V2
Octane V2
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900
138 Points ∼71% +12%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500
125 Points ∼64% +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900
123 Points ∼63%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
115 Points ∼59% -7%
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
112 Points ∼58% -9%
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
97 Points ∼50% -21%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900
339 Points ∼18% +8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900
314 Points ∼17%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500
313 Points ∼17% 0%
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
291 Points ∼16% -7%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
290 Points ∼16% -8%
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
285 Points ∼15% -9%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900
1.58 Points ∼72% +17%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500
1.4 Points ∼64% +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900
1.35 Points ∼61%
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
1.33 Points ∼60% -1%
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
1.13 Points ∼51% -16%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900
3.71 Points ∼19% +8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900
3.44 Points ∼17%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500
3.43 Points ∼17% 0%
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
3.2 Points ∼16% -7%
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
3.09 Points ∼15% -10%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900
5789 Points ∼64%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900
13975 Points ∼34%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900 (Edge 20)
209.34 Points ∼1% +60%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
197.48 Points ∼1% +51%
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
194.6 Points ∼1% +49%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900 (25.10586.0.0)
130.89 Points ∼1%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900 (Edge 20)
33031 Points ∼67% +10%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500
30419 Points ∼61% +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900 (EDGE: 25.10586.0.0)
30059 Points ∼61%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
29057 Points ∼59% -3%
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
28525 Points ∼58% -5%
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
27593 Points ∼56% -8%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900 (25.10586.0.0)
1961.2 ms * ∼3%
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
1310.6 ms * ∼2% +33%
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900 (Edge 20)
1291.4 ms * ∼2% +34%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
1266.8 ms * ∼2% +35%
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
1250.7 ms * ∼2% +36%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500
1150.9 ms * ∼2% +41%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6941
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
10595
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4903
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
7254 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
13975 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
5789 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.44 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
36.75 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.35 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
314 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
123 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
44.42 fps
ayuda
PCMark 8 Home
PCMark 8 Home
PCMark 8 Creative
PCMark 8 Creative
PCMark 8 Work
PCMark 8 Work
PCMark 8 Storage
PCMark 8 Storage
PCMark 7
PCMark 7
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
4676 Points ∼72% +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
4579 Points ∼70%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Hynix HFS128G3MND
4464 Points ∼69% -3%
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU
4155 Points ∼64% -9%
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Samsung MZRPC256HADR-000SO
4113 Points ∼63% -10%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
4064 Points ∼62% -11%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
4792 Points ∼51% +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
4327 Points ∼46%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Hynix HFS128G3MND
3885 Points ∼42% -10%
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Samsung MZRPC256HADR-000SO
3774 Points ∼41% -13%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
3592 Points ∼39% -17%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
4079 Points ∼68% +10%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
3710 Points ∼62%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Hynix HFS128G3MND
3466 Points ∼58% -7%
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Samsung MZRPC256HADR-000SO
3246 Points ∼54% -13%
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU
3209 Points ∼54% -14%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
3006 Points ∼50% -19%
PCMark 7
Productivity
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
4481 Points ∼41% +6%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
4334 Points ∼40% +2%
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU
4247 Points ∼39% 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
4232 Points ∼39%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Hynix HFS128G3MND
3837 Points ∼35% -9%
Score
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
5979 Points ∼74% +12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
5340 Points ∼66%
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU
5197 Points ∼65% -3%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Hynix HFS128G3MND
4955 Points ∼62% -7%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
4811 Points ∼60% -10%
PCMark 7 Score
5340 puntos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3710 puntos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4327 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4579 puntos
ayuda
AS SSD
AS SSD
CrystalDiskMark
CrystalDiskMark
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Hynix HFS128G3MND
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Samsung MZRPC256HADR-000SO
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-4%
-40%
-7%
-13%
-11%
Write 4k QD32
257.3
241.6
-6%
174
-32%
309.4
20%
259.7
1%
212.9
-17%
Read 4k QD32
397.7
394.5
-1%
253
-36%
319.9
-20%
369.4
-7%
248
-38%
Write 4k
90.22
93.26
3%
71.15
-21%
74.22
-18%
78.66
-13%
71.05
-21%
Read 4k
35.27
36.24
3%
6.559
-81%
28.88
-18%
26.88
-24%
21.1
-40%
Write 512
299.3
308.3
3%
179.1
-40%
338.6
13%
268.8
-10%
388
30%
Read 512
399.7
409.5
2%
282.6
-29%
368.1
-8%
386.6
-3%
392.3
-2%
Write Seq
458.8
309.5
-33%
178.6
-61%
338
-26%
268.5
-41%
447.4
-2%
Read Seq
509.7
506.9
-1%
428.2
-16%
515.1
1%
478.7
-6%
522.2
2%
Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
Sequential Read: 509.7 MB/s
Sequential Write: 458.8 MB/s
512K Read: 399.7 MB/s
512K Write: 299.3 MB/s
4K Read: 35.27 MB/s
4K Write: 90.22 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 397.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 257.3 MB/s
3DMark Ice Storm
3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited
3DMark Ice Storm Extreme
3DMark Cloud Gate
3DMark Sky Diver
3DMark Fire Strike
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra
3DMark 11
 
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940M, Intel Core i7-6500U
1589 Points ∼4% +55%
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
1520 Points ∼4% +48%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
1282 Points ∼3% +25%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
1025 Points ∼3%
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
848 Points ∼2% -17%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
12812 Points ∼8% +44%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
8885 Points ∼5%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940M, Intel Core i7-6500U
8549 Points ∼5% -4%
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
7745 Points ∼5% -13%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
7733 Points ∼5% -13%
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
7031 Points ∼4% -21%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
113807 Points ∼15% +45%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
78253 Points ∼10%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
73997 Points ∼10% -5%
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
68430 Points ∼9% -13%
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
62078 Points ∼8% -21%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940M, Intel Core i7-6500U
50719 Points ∼7% -35%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
2524 Points ∼5% +42%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940M, Intel Core i7-6500U
2366 Points ∼5% +33%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
1782 Points ∼3%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
1747 Points ∼3% -2%
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1341 Points ∼3% -25%
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1326 Points ∼3% -26%
1280x720 Performance
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
2703 Points ∼9% +39%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940M, Intel Core i7-6500U
2423 Points ∼8% +25%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
1943 Points ∼7%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
1888 Points ∼7% -3%
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1487 Points ∼5% -23%
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1483 Points ∼5% -24%
3DMark 11 Performance
1943 puntos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
60650 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
6252 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
968 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
414 puntos
ayuda
bajo medio alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 61.334297.8fps
Battlefield 4 (2013) 59.933.424.88.2fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 23.616.29.54.3fps

Ruido

Ocioso
32.2 / 32.2 / 32.3 dB(A)
HDD
32.2 dB(A)
Carga
38.4 / 39.9 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 31.2 dB(A)
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U, Iris Graphics 550
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U, GeForce 940M
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U, GeForce 920MX
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Core i5-6267U, Iris Graphics 550
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, HD Graphics 520
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
Intel Core i5-6200U, HD Graphics 520
Noise
2%
4%
1%
3%
8%
Idle Minimum *
32.2
31.3
3%
32.9
-2%
29.1
10%
32.5
-1%
31.5
2%
Idle Average *
32.2
31.7
2%
32.9
-2%
29.1
10%
32.5
-1%
31.5
2%
Idle Maximum *
32.3
31.8
2%
33
-2%
29.1
10%
32.4
-0%
31.5
2%
Load Average *
38.4
36.7
4%
33
14%
41.1
-7%
36
6%
32.4
16%
Load Maximum *
39.9
39.4
1%
34.6
13%
46.4
-16%
36.5
9%
32.3
19%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Stress test Prime95 + Furmark
Stress test Prime95 + Furmark
Stress test Furmark only
Stress test Furmark only
Stress test Prime95 only
Stress test Prime95 only
Carga Máx.
 34.7 °C39.8 °C35.1 °C 
 28.7 °C36.5 °C32.2 °C 
 26.5 °C26.3 °C28.3 °C 
Máximo: 39.8 °C
Médio: 32 °C
32.4 °C36.9 °C29 °C
31.6 °C34.8 °C27.3 °C
28 °C26.6 °C25.8 °C
Máximo: 36.9 °C
Médio: 30.3 °C
Conector de corriente  38.5 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 22.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
The speakers are situated...
The speakers are situated...
...on the base's front underside
...on the base's front underside
Equalizer with predefined sound profiles
Equalizer with predefined sound profiles
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.129.534.12532.233.632.23137.234.337.24030.330.630.35030.932.430.96329.428.929.48027.828.427.810026.926.426.91253026.53016031.624.531.620035.424.435.425049.723.149.731556.922.656.940061.221.261.250060.520.460.563060.719.660.780067.419.467.4100061.81961.8125057.718.557.7160059.518.259.520005918.659250057.418.557.4315058.718.658.7400055.718.855.7500056.718.856.7630052.618.852.6800048.518.948.51000054.118.854.11250059.818.759.81600060.618.660.6SPL71.631.271.6N28.81.628.8median 57.4Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISKmedian 18.9median 57.4Delta6.51.46.535.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

The compact power supply...
The compact power supply...
...has a maximum output of 65 watts.
...has a maximum output of 65 watts.
Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.3 / 0.5 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3.9 / 7.1 / 8.8 Watt
Carga midlight 27.6 / 30.2 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 14
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
6500U, GeForce 940M, 14
Asus X302UV-FN016T
6200U, GeForce 920MX, 13.3
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 13.3
HP Envy 13-d020ng
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 13.3
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 13.3
Power Consumption
-20%
6%
-17%
-13%
3%
Idle Minimum *
3.9
3.8
3%
3.3
15%
3.4
13%
4.2
-8%
3.8
3%
Idle Average *
7.1
7.2
-1%
5.1
28%
6.5
8%
7.4
-4%
5.8
18%
Idle Maximum *
8.8
7.6
14%
5.2
41%
7
20%
10.1
-15%
8.1
8%
Load Average *
27.6
40
-45%
29.5
-7%
44.5
-61%
33.4
-21%
30.2
-9%
Load Maximum *
30.2
52
-72%
44
-46%
49.5
-64%
34.7
-15%
32.4
-7%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Lenovo installs a 30-Wh lithium-ion battery
Lenovo installs a 30-Wh lithium-ion battery
There is plenty of room for a bigger battery
There is plenty of room for a bigger battery
Maximum battery life
Maximum battery life
Minimum battery life
Minimum battery life
Wi-Fi battery life
Wi-Fi battery life
H.264 battery life
H.264 battery life
Charging time
Charging time
Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
10h 38min
Navegando con WLAN v1.3 (EDGE: 25.10586.0.0)
6h 24min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
3h 51min
Carga (máximo brillo)
1h 40min
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 30 Wh
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
6500U, GeForce 940M, 30 Wh
Asus X302UV-FN016T
6200U, GeForce 920MX, 38 Wh
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 51 Wh
HP Envy 13-d020ng
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 45 Wh
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 51 Wh
Duración de Batería
-27%
2%
58%
-1%
23%
Reader / Idle
638
346
-46%
1035
62%
906
42%
Load
100
64
-36%
206
106%
135
35%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
384
257
-33%
392
2%
412
7%
381
-1%
349
-9%
H.264
231
246
6%

Pro

+ carcasa sólida de gran calidad
+ dispositivos de entrada decentes
+ panel IPS de ángulo de visión estable
+ bajo consumo de energía en carga
+ veloz SSD
+ relativamente silencioso incluso a plena carga
+ precio atractivo
+ garantía de 24 meses

Contra

- capacidad de batería mejorable - hay espacio para ello
- rendimiento de la Intel Iris Graphics 550 mejorable
- PWM
- se recomienda usar herramientas adecuadas para abrir el dispositivo
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Notebooksbilliger.de
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Notebooksbilliger.de

Lenovo presenta un subportátil atractivo al mercado con su IdeaPad 510S-14ISK. Su buena relación precio-rendimiento debería atraer a algunos compradores. El cliente se lleva un dispositivo de 14" en una carcasa rígida que alberga dispositivos de entrada decentes por 799 Euros. El panel Full HD IPS tiene un estable ángulo de visión y ofrece una buena reproducción de imagen con iluminación homogénea. La Intel Core i5-6267U que también integra Intel Iris Graphics 550 tiene bastante reservas de potencia para el uso rutinario.

Lenovo ha hecho un buen trabajo con el IdeaPad 510S-14ISK en muchos aspectos. Sin embargo, los usuarios que suelan viajar mucho y necesiten un dispositivo con mucho aguante no quedarán contentos a la larga con el IdeaPad 510S-14ISK.

Lo malo sigue naturalmente a lo bueno, y hay algunos puntos de crítica que resumiremos aquí:

Lo primero que notamos desfavorablemente es el aguante de la batería. Al menos debería tener una capacidad de 45-50 Wh para ofrecer periodos sin enchufe más largos. El rendimiento total de CPU y GPU no puede usarse por completo. El Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW basado en una configuracion hardware similar es mucho más rápido en ciertos casos.  Sin embargo, eso no quiere decir que el IdeaPad 510S-14ISK sea lento. Las pérdidas de rendimiento son sólo evidentes en las pruebas y apenas causan diferencia en el uso rutinario. Además de eso, la sétima generación de procesadores Intel Core saldrá en un futuro próximo. Lenovo ya lo anuncia en su tienda online.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK - 09/17/PM v5.1
Sebastian Bade

Acabado
87 /  98 → 89%
Teclado
85%
Ratón
81%
Conectividad
56 / 80 → 71%
Peso
68 / 78 → 77%
Battería
81%
Pantalla
87%
Rendimiento de juegos
59 / 68 → 87%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
84 / 87 → 97%
Temperatura
93 / 91 → 100%
Ruido
87%
Audio
79 / 91 → 87%
Cámara
53 / 85 → 62%
Médio
77%
84%
Subnotebook - media ponderada

Pricecompare

> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK (80TK003KGE)
Sebastian Bade, 2016-09-25 (Update: 2016-10- 5)