Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del Tablet Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L

Florian Wimmer (traducido por Francisco García), 11/03/2016

Bien conectado. Look elegante, internet móvil, y buen precio hacen del Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business un compañero adecuado par alas oficinas. En este análisis descubriremos qué tan adecuado es este tablet para el uso doméstico.

Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L (Tab 3 Serie)
Procesador
Mediatek MT8735
Adaptador gráfico
Memoría
2048 MB 
pantalla
10.1 pulgadas 16:10, 1920x1200 pixels 224 PPI, capacitiva, IPS, lustroso: si
Disco duro
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 26.8 GB libre
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, Audio Conexiones: clavija headset 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD hasta 64 GB, NFC, Sensores: acelerómetro, hall, USB-OTG
Equipamento de red
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4, GSM (2/3/5/8), UMTS (1/2/4/5/8), LTE (1/3/4/5/7/8/19/20), LTE, GPS
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 8.9 x 247 x 171
Battería
26.6 Wh, 7000 mAh Litio-Ion, Duración de la Batería (según el fabricante): 12 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix Auto-focus
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Características adicionales
Altavoces: altavoces Estéreo , Teclado: virtual , adaptador de corriente, cable USB, YOZO Note, SYNCit HD, SHAREit, , 12 Meses Garantía, Radio FM
Peso
509 g, Suministro de Electricidad: 83 g
Precio
319 Euros

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)
532 MBit/s ∼100% +124%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
320 MBit/s ∼60% +35%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
237 MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)
485 MBit/s ∼100% +102%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
323 MBit/s ∼67% +35%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
240 MBit/s ∼49%

Comparación de Imágenes

Elige una escena y navega dentro de la primera imagen. Un click cambia el nivel de zoom. Un click en la imagen aumentada abre la original en una ventana nueva. La primera imagen muestra la fotografía escalada del dispositivo de pruebas.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click para cargar imágenes
401
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
403
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
434
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
433
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 435 cd/m² Médio: 425.1 cd/m² Minimum: 48.36 cd/m²
iluminación: 92 %
Brillo con batería: 435 cd/m²
Contraste: 1279:1 (Negro: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.1 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.11
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
HP Pro Tablet 10 EE G1
IPS, 1280x800, 10.1
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
TFT, 1920x1200, 10.1
LG G Pad II 10.1
AH-IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Screen
-19%
-7%
-21%
-16%
Brightness
425
383
-10%
357
-16%
520
22%
367
-14%
Brightness Distribution
92
91
-1%
71
-23%
91
-1%
89
-3%
Black Level *
0.34
0.41
-21%
0.41
-21%
0.68
-100%
0.53
-56%
Contrast
1279
939
-27%
949
-26%
797
-38%
670
-48%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.1
5.31
-30%
4.64
-13%
4.2
-2%
3.2
22%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.4
5.58
-27%
1.96
55%
4.8
-9%
4.36
1%
Gamma
2.11 114%
2.4 100%
2.43 99%
2.42 99%
2.2 109%
CCT
7414 88%
7044 92%
6414 101%
7434 87%
7240 90%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
38
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
60

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
26 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 11 ms subida
↘ 15 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 42 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (26.6 ms).
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
40 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 19 ms subida
↘ 21 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 42 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (42.5 ms).

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 54 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8586 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
52322 Points ∼23% +53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
44191 Points ∼19% +29%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
34148 Points ∼15%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1657 Points ∼54% +94%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
856 Points ∼28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
388 Points ∼5% +127%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
171 Points ∼2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
468 Points ∼9% +125%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
208 Points ∼4%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Points ∼0% -100%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
16031 Points ∼22% +53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
12095 Points ∼17% +15%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
10643 Points ∼15% +2%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
10473 Points ∼15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
15554 Points ∼3% +232%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
13198 Points ∼3% +182%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
6151 Points ∼1% +31%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4681 Points ∼1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
15658 Points ∼8% +193%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
12530 Points ∼6% +135%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
6905 Points ∼4% +29%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
5337 Points ∼3%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
21 fps ∼2% +153%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps ∼1% +93%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps ∼1% +45%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8.3 fps ∼1%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps ∼5% +175%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
17 fps ∼4% +113%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps ∼2% +38%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8 fps ∼2%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
8.8 fps ∼2% +193%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
8.8 fps ∼2% +193%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
4.9 fps ∼1% +63%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3 fps ∼1%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
8.7 fps ∼2% +200%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
8.7 fps ∼2% +200%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
4.5 fps ∼1% +55%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2.9 fps ∼1%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1.9 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1.7 fps ∼0% -11%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3.1 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
2.8 fps ∼2% -10%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
4796 Points ∼56% +33%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
4458 Points ∼52% +23%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3617 Points ∼42%
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3525 Points ∼41% -3%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
767 Points ∼45% +7570%
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
725 Points ∼43% +7150%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
682 Points ∼40% +6720%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
10 Points ∼1%
Graphics
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1997 Points ∼22% +589%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
903 Points ∼10% +211%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
511 Points ∼6% +76%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
290 Points ∼3%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1362 Points ∼31% +77%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1283 Points ∼29% +67%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
769 Points ∼17%
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
462 Points ∼10% -40%
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
2240 Points ∼22% +88%
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1955 Points ∼19% +64%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1943 Points ∼19% +63%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1192 Points ∼12%
Overall
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1146 Points ∼30% +409%
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1069 Points ∼28% +375%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1015 Points ∼27% +351%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
225 Points ∼6%
Geekbench 4.0
Compute RenderScript Score
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
772 Points ∼9%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1651 Points ∼6%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
597 Points ∼10%
Octane V2 - Total Score
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
4692 Points ∼9% +73%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
4682 Points ∼9% +72%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3855 Points ∼8% +42%
HP Pro Tablet 10 EE G1
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3408 Points ∼7% +25%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2718 Points ∼5%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
12334 ms * ∼21%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
9903 ms * ∼17% +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
9788.7 ms * ∼16% +21%
HP Pro Tablet 10 EE G1
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9343.2 ms * ∼16% +24%
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
8253.1 ms * ∼14% +33%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
28.27 Points ∼0% +58%
HP Pro Tablet 10 EE G1
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash
26.113 Points ∼0% +46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
23.712 Points ∼0% +32%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
17.9 Points ∼0%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
74 Points ∼10% +40%
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
73 Points ∼10% +38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
65 Points ∼9% +23%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53 Points ∼7%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
50.09 MB/s ∼57% +136%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
23.14 MB/s ∼27% +9%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
21.22 MB/s ∼24%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
75.54 MB/s ∼78% +76%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
50.25 MB/s ∼52% +17%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
42.9 MB/s ∼44%
Random Write 4KB
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
17 MB/s ∼10% +144%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
10.01 MB/s ∼6% +44%
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
9.52 MB/s ∼6% +37%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
6.96 MB/s ∼4%
Random Read 4KB
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
25 MB/s ∼14% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
23.46 MB/s ∼14% +10%
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
21.61 MB/s ∼12% +1%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
21.33 MB/s ∼12%
Sequential Write 256KB
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
76 MB/s ∼36% +80%
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
59.11 MB/s ∼28% +40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45.88 MB/s ∼22% +9%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
42.14 MB/s ∼20%
Sequential Read 256KB
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
215.76 MB/s ∼27% +9%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
197.98 MB/s ∼25%
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
155.77 MB/s ∼20% -21%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
146 MB/s ∼18% -26%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguracionesValor
 high18 fps
 very low29 fps
Carga Máx.
 32.9 °C32.8 °C33.7 °C 
 31.4 °C31.4 °C34.1 °C 
 29.6 °C29.8 °C33.2 °C 
Máximo: 34.1 °C
Médio: 32.1 °C
32 °C32.4 °C35.3 °C
31.1 °C32.5 °C34.5 °C
31.3 °C30.6 °C29.6 °C
Máximo: 35.3 °C
Médio: 32.1 °C
Conector de corriente  44.4 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
Heatmap Front
Heatmap Front
Heatmap Back
Heatmap Back
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.644.92525.434.83125.328.84032.927.65033.641.26331.637.38028.439.61002728.112520.829.31602230.420021.334.425020.841.631521.252.440019.458.150019.563.863017.770.680017.975.3100017.875.1125017.371.2160017.470.3200016.768.7250017.272.1315018.272.3400017.974.7500017.674.6630017.773.4800017.870.91000017.967.21250018.163.11600018.251.1SPL3084.3N1.359.6median 17.9Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70Lmedian 68.7Delta1.312.139.432.336.737.632.439.433.729.835.128.731.333.730.631.425.928.431.730.631.829.739.639.12631.840.437.636.43739.440.433.335.529.331.536.233.328.436.131.129.228.628.428.826.833.430.225.428.831.125.63625.721.331.14133.546.841.623.3415447.857.148.822.55457.647.263.655.622.457.663.956.473.260.921.363.969.859.274.862.118.469.868.756.176.862.917.568.77058.379.665.817.57069.95478.462.517.269.965.248.576.358.216.865.266.949.175.956.917.366.977.456.978.76217.477.477.359.580.261.916.677.373.154.7806217.373.17555.780.862.717.67574.955.380.76317.674.97858.28263.617.77873.955.180.663.117.473.967.348.777.860.317.767.357.239.271.453.817.957.250.831.561.943.218.150.840.623.75233.918.140.68667.791.27429.88664.522.994.234.91.364.5median 67.3Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inchmedian 54median 76.3median 60.9median 17.7median 67.311.18.410.67.51.611.137.932.437.930.931.330.934.231.734.233.72633.731.439.431.430.436.230.431.628.631.625.125.425.126.921.326.932.823.332.842.522.542.549.322.449.356.121.356.160.618.460.666.117.566.170.517.570.573.217.273.277.216.877.276.917.376.975.517.475.574.516.674.575.417.375.475.317.675.380.317.680.380.517.780.579.717.479.781.717.781.776.917.976.969.818.169.863.818.163.889.429.889.479.21.379.2median 73.2Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585median 17.7median 73.211.91.611.9hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.29 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 18% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.23 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 15% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.42 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 15% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.04 / 0.14 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.7 / 4.4 / 4.7 Watt
Carga midlight 8.4 / 9.2 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
7000 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
6660 mAh
HP Pro Tablet 10 EE G1
 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
7300 mAh
LG G Pad II 10.1
7400 mAh
Power Consumption
11%
-42%
16%
-46%
Idle Minimum *
1.7
1.6
6%
3.5
-106%
1.18
31%
3.6
-112%
Idle Average *
4.4
4.13
6%
5.5
-25%
4.65
-6%
6.2
-41%
Idle Maximum *
4.7
4.22
10%
5.7
-21%
4.74
-1%
6.3
-34%
Load Average *
8.4
6.57
22%
10.7
-27%
5.75
32%
10
-19%
Load Maximum *
9.2
8.32
10%
12.2
-33%
6.97
24%
11.4
-24%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
16h 15min
Navegando con WLAN v1.3
10h 01min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 47min
Carga (máximo brillo)
4h 51min
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
7000 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
6660 mAh
HP Pro Tablet 10 EE G1
 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
7300 mAh
LG G Pad II 10.1
7400 mAh
Duración de Batería
3%
-23%
77%
47%
Reader / Idle
975
988
1%
2634
170%
1676
72%
H.264
587
602
3%
893
52%
1020
74%
WiFi v1.3
601
698
16%
464
-23%
826
37%
782
30%
Load
291
266
-9%
428
47%
325
12%

Pro

+ pantalla brillante con potente contraste
+ varias configuraciones de sonido e imagen
+ precio relativamente bajo
+ internet móvil
+ protección básica frente al polvo y los derrames de agua
+ NFC y USB OTG
+ veloz WLAN
+ cámaras decentes
+ apenas se calienta

Contra

- bajo rendimiento
- gran consumo de energía en carga
- garantía limitada a 1 año
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Notebooksbilliger.de
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Notebooksbilliger.de

El Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business tiene algunas ventajas importantes: la pantalla es genial y ofrece varias opciones. Las temperaturas son muy buenas y la WLAN o Internet móvil es fiable. Sobre todo: el tablet cuesta300 Euros.

Hay una gran desventaja: el rendimiento del tablet es muy inferior al de los dispositivos de comparación. Es difícil jugar en este dispositivo, y hasta navegar puede ser lento.

Afortunadamente, Lenovo no incluye apps spam, pero ofrece cámaras decentes y un GPS fiable. El dispositivo incluso está certificado frente al polvo y a las gotas de agua. Por supuesto, no es un tablet para el mundo de la construcción, pero al menos ofrece cierta protección. Si buscas un dispositivo así, recomendamos el Tablet de Panasonic o  el HP Pro Tablet 10.

El Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business es un buen tablet barato de oficina. Rendimiento no mucho, pero la mayoría de características sí están presentes.

Su aspecto conservador es su punto mas fuerte. Los usuarios domésticos a los que les guste navegar y jugar querrán echar un vistazo al Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L - 10/20/2016 v5.1
Florian Wimmer

Acabado
81%
Teclado
70 / 80 → 87%
Ratón
89%
Conectividad
38 / 65 → 58%
Peso
83 / 88 → 90%
Battería
92%
Pantalla
85%
Rendimiento de juegos
10 / 68 → 14%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
32 / 76 → 42%
Temperatura
92%
Ruido
100%
Audio
57 / 91 → 63%
Cámara
56 / 85 → 66%
Médio
68%
82%
Tablet - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Tablet Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Florian Wimmer, 2016-11- 3 (Update: 2016-11- 3)