Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del portátil Gigabyte P55W v7

Sven Kloevekorn, Stefanie Voigt (traducido por Fernando Alvarez Ude), 03/05/2017

v7 por excelencia. La nueva máquina para juegos de Gigabyte está enfocado a jugones que busquen el mejor ratio potencia/precio y a los que no importe hacer alguna concesión para conseguirlo. Comparado con su predecesor, el P55W v7 proporciona mayor rendimiento y un sistema de refrigeración más silencioso y eficaz.

Gigabyte P55W v7 (P55 Serie)
Procesador
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
Adaptador gráfico
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) - 6144 MB, Núcleo: 1405 MHz, Memoría: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 378.49, Nvidia Optimus
Memoría
16384 MB 
, SO-DIMM DDR4, 2400 MHz, single-channel, 1 of 2 memory banks filled, max. 32 GB
pantalla
15.6 pulgadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels 141 PPI, LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, Full HD, lustroso: no
Placa base
Intel HM175
Disco duro
Liteonit CV3-8D256, 256 GB 
, SATA-3-SSD + HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, 1 TB HDD @ 7200 rpm. Slots: 1x M.2 type 2280 (optional PCIe/NVMe) & 1x 2.5 inch
Tarjeta de sonido
Realtek ALC255 @ High Definition Audio-Controller
Conexiones
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Conexiones: headphone (audio out) + microphone (audio in), both 3.5-mm jacks, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Brightness Sensor
Equipamento de red
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Unidad óptica
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUD0N
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 34 x 380 x 269
Battería
63 Wh Litio-Polimero, 6 cells
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionales
Altavoces: stereo, 2 x 2 watts, Teclado: chiclet, Luz de Teclado: si, 180-watt power supply, Adobe Reader XI, CyberLink PowerDVD 12, MS Office 365 trial, diverse manufacturer tools, 24 Meses Garantía
Peso
2.628 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 646 g
Precio
1700 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Gigabyte P55W v7
Gigabyte P55W v7
Gigabyte P55W v7
Gigabyte P55W v7
Gigabyte P55W v7
Gigabyte P55W v7
Gigabyte P55W v7
Gigabyte P55W v7
Gigabyte P55W v7
Gigabyte P55W v7
Gigabyte P55W v7

Size Comparison

380 mm 269 mm 34 mm 2.6 kg390 mm 266 mm 24 mm 2.5 kg380 mm 269 mm 34 mm 2.7 kg383 mm 260 mm 29 mm 2.5 kg385 mm 271 mm 25 mm 2.8 kg
Left: Kensington, vent, mini-DisplayPort, Ethernet, HDMI, USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-C, USB 3.0
Left: Kensington, vent, mini-DisplayPort, Ethernet, HDMI, USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-C, USB 3.0
Right: audio-in (mic), audio-out (headset), 2x USB 3.0, DVD burner, power
Right: audio-in (mic), audio-out (headset), 2x USB 3.0, DVD burner, power
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
677 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Gigabyte P55W v7
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
663 MBit/s ∼98%
Gigabyte P55W v6
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
660 MBit/s ∼97% 0%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
507 MBit/s ∼100% +8%
Gigabyte P55W v6
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
492 MBit/s ∼97% +5%
Gigabyte P55W v7
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
470 MBit/s ∼93%
270
cd/m²
271
cd/m²
283
cd/m²
280
cd/m²
287
cd/m²
299
cd/m²
295
cd/m²
304
cd/m²
309
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 309 cd/m² Médio: 288.7 cd/m² Minimum: 9 cd/m²
iluminación: 87 %
Brillo con batería: 287 cd/m²
Contraste: 990:1 (Negro: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.92 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 3.66 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
82% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.32
Gigabyte P55W v7
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US
1920x1080, 15.6
Schenker XMG P507
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.6
Gigabyte P55W v6
LG Philips LP156WF4 (LGD040E), 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
-4%
-3%
6%
-38%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
37 (15, 22)
40 (15, 25)
-8%
36.8 (16.4, 20.4)
1%
36 (12, 24)
3%
56 (23, 33)
-51%
Response Time Black / White *
25 (5, 20)
25 (5, 20)
-0%
26.4 (5.2, 21.2)
-6%
23 (5, 18)
8%
31 (8, 23)
-24%
PWM Frequency
Screen
3%
16%
-1%
-6%
Brightness middle
287
321
12%
302
5%
288
0%
280
-2%
Brightness
289
296
2%
303
5%
292
1%
294
2%
Brightness Distribution
87
88
1%
87
0%
87
0%
82
-6%
Black Level *
0.29
0.33
-14%
0.169
42%
0.3
-3%
0.46
-59%
Contrast
990
973
-2%
1787
81%
960
-3%
609
-38%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.92
4.42
10%
4.61
6%
5.1
-4%
4.48
9%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
11
9.78
11%
9.98
9%
9.44
14%
10.16
8%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.66
3.34
9%
3.32
9%
4.43
-21%
2.69
27%
Gamma
2.32 95%
2.4 92%
2.24 98%
2.46 89%
2.37 93%
CCT
6482 100%
6213 105%
6358 102%
6687 97%
6455 101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
54
55
2%
55.4
3%
55
2%
53
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
82
83
1%
84.4
3%
83
1%
80
-2%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
-1% / 2%
7% / 13%
3% / -0%
-22% / -12%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
25 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 5 ms subida
↘ 20 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 41 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (25.2 ms).
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
37 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 15 ms subida
↘ 22 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 32 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (40.2 ms).

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 51 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 9439 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Gigabyte P55W v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
156 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG P507
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points ∼95% -5%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points ∼95% -5%
Gigabyte P55W v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
143 Points ∼92% -8%
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
138 Points ∼88% -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Gigabyte P55W v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
733 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG P507
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
682 Points ∼93% -7%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
680 Points ∼93% -7%
Gigabyte P55W v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
673 Points ∼92% -8%
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
658 Points ∼90% -10%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
156 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
733 Points
ayuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Gigabyte P55W v7
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D256
5317 Points ∼100%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
5109 Points ∼96% -4%
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
5046 Points ∼95% -5%
Gigabyte P55W v6
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 128GB M.2 (TS128GMTS800)
4784 Points ∼90% -10%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
4741 Points ∼100% +18%
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
4059 Points ∼86% +1%
Gigabyte P55W v6
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 128GB M.2 (TS128GMTS800)
4014 Points ∼85% 0%
Gigabyte P55W v7
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D256
4013 Points ∼85%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4013 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5317 puntos
ayuda
Gigabyte P55W v7
Liteonit CV3-8D256
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US
Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
Schenker XMG P507
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
Gigabyte P55W v6
Transcend MTS800 128GB M.2 (TS128GMTS800)
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
28%
249%
227%
-6%
Write 4k QD32
240.1
301.5
26%
422.8
76%
386.8
61%
160.3
-33%
Read 4k QD32
358.5
246.7
-31%
590.6
65%
694.7
94%
264.7
-26%
Write 4k
54.98
86.25
57%
139.2
153%
167.4
204%
76.7
40%
Read 4k
25.4
25.61
1%
50.84
100%
54.08
113%
26.2
3%
Write 512
254.8
407.1
60%
1562
513%
1239
386%
160.8
-37%
Read 512
252.5
335
33%
1044
313%
971
285%
338
34%
Write Seq
261.9
462.7
77%
1584
505%
1240
373%
161.1
-38%
Read Seq
466.2
462.5
-1%
1696
264%
1857
298%
511
10%
Liteonit CV3-8D256
Sequential Read: 466.2 MB/s
Sequential Write: 261.9 MB/s
512K Read: 252.5 MB/s
512K Write: 254.8 MB/s
4K Read: 25.4 MB/s
4K Write: 54.98 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 358.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 240.1 MB/s
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11872 Points ∼100% +4%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11622 Points ∼98% +2%
Gigabyte P55W v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11426 Points ∼96%
Gigabyte P55W v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11422 Points ∼96% 0%
Schenker XMG P507
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11045 Points ∼93% -3%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
15466 Points ∼100% +5%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
15387 Points ∼99% +5%
Gigabyte P55W v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14792 Points ∼96% +1%
Gigabyte P55W v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14693 Points ∼95%
Schenker XMG P507
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14222 Points ∼92% -3%
3DMark 11 Performance
11778 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
21839 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9669 puntos
ayuda
bajo medio alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 70.438.4fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 72.661.8fps
Battlefield 1 (2016) 77.673.6fps
Dishonored 2 (2016) 80.260.246.5fps
Resident Evil 7 (2017) 98.583fps

Ruido

Ocioso
33 / 34 / 35 dB(A)
HDD
34 dB(A)
DVD
37 / dB(A)
Carga
39 / 50 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Carga Máx.
 49.6 °C43.6 °C31.1 °C 
 49 °C45.4 °C31.8 °C 
 45.1 °C44.3 °C28.3 °C 
Máximo: 49.6 °C
Médio: 40.9 °C
26.3 °C38.7 °C47.7 °C
29.7 °C44.7 °C47.1 °C
28.5 °C44.5 °C46.3 °C
Máximo: 47.7 °C
Médio: 39.3 °C
Conector de corriente  40.1 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.6 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 39.5 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.7 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 42 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.8 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 45.1 °C / 113.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-16.3 °C / -29.4 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.548.72535.843.33131.330.44036.537.65033.133.46334.729.88034.234.3100323212526.432.116022.739.820021.852.525022.857.731520.558.640019.958.250019.261.463019.163.580018.558.2100018.665.212501872.4160017.769.6200017.567.3250017.662.9315017.861.540001860.5500018.265.6630018.468.7800018.472.71000018.761.41250018.963.71600019.355.2SPL30.679.2N1.544.6median 18.7median 61.4Delta1.84.738.135.744.241.14038.832.337.229.334.231.429.93134.524.335.423.525.626.634.822.343.522.851.721.260.720.36119.260.618.764.818.464.618.667.519.465.818.662.718.863.518.864.718.764.618.863.418.966.918.965.918.953.71949.718.849.318.745.431.276.31.538.8median 18.9median 611.38.640.442.437.538.237.935.934.834.934.334.632.83331.434.330.235.530.440.628.349.128.35328.358.327.2612763.426.665.32663.625.65625.46325.765.625.162.424.153.124.156.523.762.923.964.923.767.123.664.823.371.723.368.723.462.623.458.336.876.92.840.9median 25.4median 62.62.35.837.230.229.929.329.2293328.729.228.126.826.825.928.624.928.324.329.622.437.722.447.120.347.820.750.719.261.718.666.318.965.418.461.618.760.417.863.51862.417.862.818.164.818.164.91858.417.857.71862.518.161.718.160.918.158.8185730.474.71.435.4median 18.1median 60.916.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGigabyte P55W v7Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039TMSI GE62VR 6RF-001USSchenker XMG P507
Gigabyte P55W v7 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.94 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Schenker XMG P507 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.4 / 0.8 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 8 / 13 / 18 Watt
Carga midlight 76 / 143 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Gigabyte P55W v7
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Schenker XMG P507
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Gigabyte P55W v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Power Consumption
-35%
-97%
-21%
-0%
Idle Minimum *
8
16
-100%
25.4
-218%
11
-38%
8
-0%
Idle Average *
13
19
-46%
30.3
-133%
16
-23%
13
-0%
Idle Maximum *
18
23
-28%
31.5
-75%
21
-17%
17
6%
Load Average *
76
68
11%
111.8
-47%
80
-5%
71
7%
Load Maximum *
143
157
-10%
163.2
-14%
174
-22%
165
-15%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
13h 9min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
5h 46min
Carga (máximo brillo)
1h 38min
Gigabyte P55W v7
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 63 Wh
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 64 Wh
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 51 Wh
Schenker XMG P507
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 60 Wh
Gigabyte P55W v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 63 Wh
Duración de Batería
-36%
-73%
-14%
-8%
Reader / Idle
789
315
-60%
137
-83%
409
-48%
610
-23%
WiFi v1.3
346
220
-36%
101
-71%
274
-21%
352
2%
Load
98
87
-11%
35
-64%
123
26%
95
-3%
H.264
235
338

Pro

+ impeccably built, solid-looking casing
+ relatively long battery life
+ a lot of (gaming) bang for the buck
+ good input devices
+ USB 3.1 Gen.2 Type-C
+ IPS panel
+ no PWM

Contra

- occasional fan whistling/coil whining at higher speeds
- plastic casing with sensitive surfaces
- unfavorable interface positioning
- comparatively slow SSD
- response times not ideal
- no Thunderbolt 3

Error: More than one (2) Pro / Contra Item for this review found!

Gigabyte P55W v7. Modelo de prueba cedido por Gigabyte Alemania.
Gigabyte P55W v7. Modelo de prueba cedido por Gigabyte Alemania.

Gigabyte ha recortado en los lugares adecuados y nos ofrece un portátil para juegos más que aceptable. La carencia de algunas características como el puerto Thunderbolt 3 o G-Sync hace posible ahorrar unos pocos cientos de Euros sin comprometer el rendimiento.

Considerando el bajo precio, nos han gustado los dispositivos de entrada y, con algunas puntualizaciones, el panel IPS. Ocurre lo mismo con la sólida carcasa de plástico con su base fácilmente extraíble. La situación de los puertos, la lenta respuesta de la pantalla y el SSD no son puntos tan favorables. Los ruidos que se escuchan cuando el sistema está bajo carga intensa son el punto débil del P55W v7. Sin embargo, no es algo realmente importante, por tanto el portátil obtiene una clara recomendación de compra.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Gigabyte P55W v7 - 02/28/2017 v6
Sven Kloevekorn

Acabado
79 / 98 → 81%
Teclado
81%
Ratón
78%
Conectividad
60 / 81 → 74%
Peso
59 / 10-66 → 87%
Battería
87%
Pantalla
86%
Rendimiento de juegos
92%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
91%
Temperatura
86 / 95 → 90%
Ruido
71 / 90 → 79%
Audio
68%
Cámara
71 / 85 → 84%
Médio
78%
84%
Gaming - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del portátil Gigabyte P55W v7
Sven Kloevekorn, 2017-03- 5 (Update: 2017-03- 5)