Notebookcheck Logo

Breve análisis del portátil Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus (Core i7)

Movilidad multimedia. Estiloso, compacto, ligero y versátil. Suena bien, ¿verdad? Mientras la mayoría de los subportátiles son usados como máquinas de oficina, el 710s es un portátil multimedia que permite jugar a algún juego ocasionalmente. Nuestro test muestra si el recién llegado puede seguir los pasos de su predecesor.
Procesador
Intel Core i7-7500U 2 x 2.7 - 3.5 GHz, Kaby Lake
Adaptador gráfico
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX - 2048 MB VRAM, Núcleo: 1242 MHz, Memoría: 5000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 369.15, Nvidia Optimus
Memoría
8 GB 
, DDR4, 2134 MHz, single-channel, soldado, todas las ranuras de memoria ocupadas
pantalla
13.30 pulgadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels 166 PPI, LG Philips LP133WF4-SPB1 (LGD04EF), IPS, lustroso: si
Placa base
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Disco duro
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, 512 GB 
Tarjeta de sonido
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Conexiones: combo audio entrada/salida, jack 3.5-mm, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, 1 Lector de Huellas Digitales, Brightness Sensor
Equipamento de red
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 14 x 307 x 214
Battería
46 Wh Litio-Polimero, 4 celdas
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD 720p (0.9 MP)
Características adicionales
Altavoces: frontal inferior, altavoces JBL estereo con certificado DolbyDAX2, Teclado: chiclet, Luz de Teclado: si, 24 Meses Garantía
Peso
1.1 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 212 g
Precio
1299 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Lenovo Ideapad 710S Plus
Lenovo Ideapad 710S Plus
Lenovo Ideapad 710S Plus
Lenovo Ideapad 710S Plus
Lenovo Ideapad 710S Plus
Lenovo Ideapad 710S Plus
Lenovo Ideapad 710S Plus
Lenovo Ideapad 710S Plus
Lenovo Ideapad 710S Plus
Lenovo Ideapad 710S Plus

Size Comparison

324.6 mm 229.6 mm 9.98 mm 1.1 kg307 mm 214 mm 14 mm 1.1 kg304 mm 201 mm 15 mm 1.2 kg292 mm 209 mm 12.4 mm 979 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
 
107.8 MB/s +58%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
 
68.1 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
 
250.6 MB/s +185%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
 
88 MB/s
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
614 MBit/s
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
575 MBit/s -6%
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
608 MBit/s
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
525 MBit/s -14%
314
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
302
cd/m²
316
cd/m²
343
cd/m²
306
cd/m²
278
cd/m²
289
cd/m²
290
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
LG Philips LP133WF4-SPB1 (LGD04EF) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 343 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 305.9 cd/m² Minimum: 6.4 cd/m²
iluminación: 81 %
Brillo con batería: 343 cd/m²
Contraste: 1143:1 (Negro: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.73 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.29 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
83% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
82.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
LG Philips LP133WF4-SPB1 (LGD04EF), , 1920x1080, 13.30
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
Chimei Innolux, N133HCE-GP1, , 1920x1080, 13.30
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
AUO226D, , 1920x1080, 12.50
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Sharp SHP1449 LQ133M1, , 1920x1080, 13.30
Display
4%
-26%
-18%
Display P3 Coverage
65.3
64.6
-1%
44.45
-32%
48.94
-25%
sRGB Coverage
82.9
89.1
7%
65.2
-21%
73.3
-12%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
60.6
64.8
7%
45.96
-24%
50.5
-17%
Response Times
19%
23%
7%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
45 ?(12, 33)
31 ?(14, 17)
31%
32 ?(14.8, 17.2)
29%
32.8 ?(16, 16.8)
27%
Response Time Black / White *
29 ?(6, 23)
27 ?(7, 20)
7%
24 ?(12.4, 11.6)
17%
33.2 ?(10.8, 22.4)
-14%
PWM Frequency
Screen
3%
-9%
-7%
Brightness middle
343
359
5%
289
-16%
351.2
2%
Brightness
306
344
12%
298
-3%
325
6%
Brightness Distribution
81
92
14%
87
7%
89
10%
Black Level *
0.3
0.25
17%
0.27
10%
0.195
35%
Contrast
1143
1436
26%
1070
-6%
1801
58%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.73
4.57
3%
4.82
-2%
7.4
-56%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.05
9.25
-2%
10.73
-19%
9.08
-0%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.29
5.2
-58%
3.84
-17%
6.71
-104%
Gamma
2.36 93%
2.47 89%
2.41 91%
2.74 80%
CCT
6437 101%
6887 94%
6492 100%
7222 90%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
54
58
7%
42.03
-22%
50.48
-7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
83
89
7%
64.8
-22%
73.31
-12%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
9% / 5%
-4% / -8%
-6% / -7%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
29 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 6 ms subida
↘ 23 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 73 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21.6 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
45 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 12 ms subida
↘ 33 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 73 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (33.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 18110 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 3846000) Hz.

 
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV
Intel Core i5-7200U
128 Points +16%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
124 Points +13%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Intel Core m5-6Y54
111 Points +1%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
Intel Core i5-7Y54
111 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
Intel Core i7-7500U
110 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV
Intel Core i5-7200U
320 Points +9%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
318 Points +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
Intel Core i7-7500U
293 Points
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Intel Core m5-6Y54
250 Points -15%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
Intel Core i5-7Y54
207 Points -29%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
110 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
293 Points
ayuda
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
3535 Points +12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
3147 Points
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG
3064 Points -3%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
3037 Points -3%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
4568 Points +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
4184 Points
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
4146 Points -1%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3147 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4184 puntos
ayuda
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-48%
-6%
-27%
Read Seq
1577
431.2
-73%
1482
-6%
1233
-22%
Write Seq
1472
401
-73%
1232
-16%
733
-50%
Read 512
1165
283.7
-76%
1191
2%
1036
-11%
Write 512
1244
313.6
-75%
1220
-2%
439.9
-65%
Read 4k
54.8
36.62
-33%
46.96
-14%
29.31
-47%
Write 4k
121.5
76.1
-37%
100.7
-17%
116.9
-4%
Read 4k QD32
407.5
329.4
-19%
464
14%
479.2
18%
Write 4k QD32
321.4
325.6
1%
292.1
-9%
218.3
-32%
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Sequential Read: 1577 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1472 MB/s
512K Read: 1165 MB/s
512K Write: 1244 MB/s
4K Read: 54.8 MB/s
4K Write: 121.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 407.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 321.4 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U
2447 Points
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1545 Points -37%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
1254 Points -49%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
1039 Points -58%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U
13075 Points
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
8177 Points -37%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
7035 Points -46%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
5541 Points -58%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U
1940 Points
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
963 Points -50%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
844 Points -56%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
647 Points -67%
3DMark 11 Performance
2589 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
7123 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1794 puntos
ayuda
bajo medio alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 38.6 22.4
Far Cry Primal (2016) 36 16
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) 94.1 40 26.8

Ruido

Ocioso
30.6 / 30.6 / 30.6 dB(A)
Carga
36.2 / 37.2 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 30.6 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.636.634.434.235.62541.342.740.241.241.33142.944.346.743.342.94035.235.637.236.535.25036.335.332.435.636.36330.133.729.628.830.18027.227.526.827.827.210028.228.326.526.428.212525.426.225.825.625.416024.524.824.323.824.520024.324.123.123.624.32502323.921.722.32331523.423.221.521.423.440023.422.72120.723.4500232220.120.3236302221.319.5192280023.222.418.718.623.2100026.124.718.418.126.1125025.324.218.317.925.3160026.725.417.917.826.7200027.325.61817.627.3250027.626.817.817.627.6315025.82517.918.125.8400025.523.918.218.125.5500025.423.718.518.325.4630022.921.318.518.522.9800021.521.218.518.421.51000020.219.918.518.520.21250019.519.818.418.319.5160002021.218.518.320SPL37.336.230.830.637.3N2.72.41.51.52.7median 24.3median 23.9median 18.5median 18.5median 24.3Delta1.81.81.71.91.833.533.934.633.54139.539.64141.941.939.941.933.73735.233.729.732.232.329.728.929.928.228.926.830.92626.826.226.92626.225.125.525.425.124.624.923.324.623.523.423.823.522.422.622.722.420.621.421.620.620.320.120.220.319.820.119.619.81919.118.61918.418.418.618.418.217.91818.21817.817.41817.817.717.917.817.817.717.517.817.717.817.817.717.917.817.917.918.117.91818.118.118.318.318.118.318.218.418.318.418.418.418.418.418.418.418.418.218.218.218.218.219.718.418.230.530.630.530.51.41.51.41.4median 18.4median 18.4median 18.4median 18.41.12.11.11.1hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseLenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKBAcer Swift 7 SF713-51
Temperature development upper side (load)
Temperature development upper side (load)
Temperature development underside (load)
Temperature development underside (load)
Temperature development upper side (idle)
Temperature development upper side (idle)
Temperature development underside (idle)
Temperature development underside (idle)
Carga Máx.
 31.9 °C42.6 °C43.2 °C 
 29.7 °C37.6 °C29.2 °C 
 27.6 °C27.6 °C30.4 °C 
Máximo: 43.2 °C
Médio: 33.3 °C
40.9 °C45.3 °C33.6 °C
35.1 °C36.4 °C30.8 °C
30.5 °C30.9 °C28.9 °C
Máximo: 45.3 °C
Médio: 34.7 °C
Conector de corriente  43 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 22.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.3 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.4 °C / 86.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.634.232.62542.241.242.2314443.3444035.836.535.8503235.6326330.828.830.88028.727.828.710029.726.429.712529.225.629.216032.323.832.320034.523.634.525046.122.346.131558.121.458.140064.720.764.750063.820.363.863064.71964.780075.718.675.7100069.518.169.5125062.717.962.7160065.217.865.2200065.117.665.1250062.517.662.5315059.618.159.6400057.218.157.250005818.358630057.918.557.9800053.418.453.41000059.718.559.71250067.218.367.21600067.618.367.6SPL7830.678N38.71.538.7median 59.7median 18.5median 59.7Delta8.11.98.134.834.634.843.239.643.242.939.942.934.735.234.734.432.334.430.628.230.636.12636.139.92639.94425.44445.423.345.441.223.841.250.622.750.657.921.657.963.420.263.463.419.663.463.318.663.368.118.668.165.41865.461.317.461.363.217.963.262.317.562.358.417.858.459.817.959.862.11862.157.918.357.961.418.461.455.218.455.253.618.453.65418.25448.618.448.674.230.574.234.61.434.6median 58.4median 18.4median 58.47.21.17.234.636.335.434.634.433.133.134.435.534.233.935.535.735.835.735.734.436.634.234.434.434.53434.433.334.53533.336.436.73836.439.138.437.839.14435.330.64453.743.529.953.759.249.329.859.264.554.329.264.56554.2286566.956.526.866.967.15625.567.170.360.225.270.373.963.724.673.975.26524.275.273.162.823.573.175.164.123.675.174.964.423.474.97465.523.57473.664.123.473.66961.123.46966.560.223.566.56056.822.96060.650.924.460.658.148.825.758.161.348.123.561.3median 66.5median 56.5median 24.6median 66.56.36.93.46.336.336.236.336.137.436.134.832.734.834.431.434.432.433.132.433.232.433.236.331.936.336.729.536.742.230.142.252.527.652.552.527.752.556.726.856.756.82756.856.725.756.755.224.955.26124.36160.523.960.561.423.761.461.423.361.459.723.259.759.822.759.855.922.755.950.722.750.757.722.757.758.422.758.454.222.854.255.122.855.153.622.753.649.722.749.741.122.941.170.435.570.4282.528median 55.9median 23.3median 55.94.31.34.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKBAcer Swift 7 SF713-51HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EADell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.34 / 0.4 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3.6 / 7.4 / 8.7 Watt
Carga midlight 43 / 42 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG, IPS, WLED, 1920x1080, 13.30
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
6Y54, HD Graphics 515, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.50
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30
Power Consumption
28%
20%
30%
Idle Minimum *
3.6
4.1
-14%
4.3
-19%
4.1
-14%
Idle Average *
7.4
6.4
14%
6
19%
4.2
43%
Idle Maximum *
8.7
6.8
22%
6.4
26%
5.1
41%
Load Average *
43
16
63%
22.7
47%
22.1
49%
Load Maximum *
42
18.7
55%
31.2
26%
29.4
30%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
7h 48min
WiFi Websurfing
5h 38min
Carga (máximo brillo)
1h 29min
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 46 Wh
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 41.58 Wh
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 38 Wh
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
Duración de Batería
68%
29%
118%
Reader / Idle
468
792
69%
526
12%
1295
177%
WiFi v1.3
338
438
30%
355
5%
677
100%
Load
89
182
104%
152
71%
157
76%
H.264
410
413

Pro

+ Fino y ligero
+ Carcasa solida y muy buen construida
+ Superficies con buena apariencia
+ Resistente a huellas
+ Buenos dispositivos de entrada
+ TPM, lector de huellas
+ Pantalla brillante y de alto contraste
+ Pantalla sin PWM
+ GeForce 940MX con GDDR5
+ Buen rendimiento WiFi
+ Buena Webcam
+ SSD rápido
+ Funciona en silencio y no se calienta

Contra

- Hace fala mucha fuerza para abrir la tapa
- Pocas interfaces
- La única forma de conectar una pantalla externa es a través del puerto USB Type-C
- Pantalla reflectiva
- No adecuado para editar imágenes
- Tiempos de respuesta no adecuados para juegos
- La velocidad de reloj de la GeForce 940MX es muy reducida
- El ventilador se pone en marcha con mucha falcidad
- La velocidad de la CPU se redujo en Cinebench y en los test
- La duración de batería podia ser mayor
Análisis: Lenovo Ideapad 710S Plus. Modelo de prueba cedido por Campuspoint.de
Análisis: Lenovo Ideapad 710S Plus. Modelo de prueba cedido por Campuspoint.de

Al contrario que nos ocurrió con su predecesor, hemos descubierto algunos pequeños fallos de fabricación en el nuevo Ideapad 710S Plus de Lenovo. Sin embargo lo único que tiene importancia es el touchpad, que no es totalmente liso. La estupenda pantalla habría sido aún mejor con una superficie mate y una mayor cobertura de color. Incluso a pesar de que en el mundo de los subportátiles está bien vista la ausencia de muchas interfaces no habría estado mal un puerto de salida de video dedicado, como HDMI o un DP. La duración de batería no es la adecuada para definirlo como un dispositivo para movilidad. El único inconveniente que podría poner en peligro la recomendación de compra es el molesto ruido ocasional del ventilador, aunque hay que tener en cuenta que no debería suponer problema la mayor parte del tiempo y de que podría tratarse de un fallo puntual de nuestro modelo de prueba.

Movilidad y versatilidad son las propiedades más importantes del muy convincente Lenovo Ideapad 710S Plus. Sin embargo los potenciales compradores deberían tener en cuenta el problema con el ventilador.

Por supuesto, la ligera y rígida carcasa debe ser mencionada como punto a favor. Los dispositivos de entrada son adecuados para la mayoría de los usuarios. TPM y el lector de huellas son adecuados para usuarios preocupados por la seguridad y la ligera reducción de velocidad de la GeForce 940MS con memoria GDDR5 resultará adecuada para los jugadores casuales. En contraste con su predecesor, no se usa PWM, el SSD es muy rápido y no se pueden poner peros al rendimiento WiFi. En resumen, no quiero negarle al nuevo 710S la recomendación de compra pero si recomendaríamos que lo oigas en funcionamiento. Los usuarios que no quieran jugar posiblemente harían mejor en comprar la versión más barata equipada con un i5-7200U.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB - 02/01/2017 v6(old)
Sven Kloevekorn

Acabado
87 /  98 → 89%
Teclado
85%
Ratón
84%
Conectividad
51 / 80 → 64%
Peso
74 / 35-78 → 90%
Battería
86%
Pantalla
84%
Rendimiento de juegos
66 / 68 → 97%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
82 / 87 → 94%
Temperatura
92 / 91 → 100%
Ruido
85%
Audio
50 / 91 → 55%
Cámara
71 / 85 → 83%
Médio
77%
86%
Subnotebook - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del portátil Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus (Core i7)
Sven Kloevekorn, 2017-02-10 (Update: 2017-02-10)