Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del Smartphone ElePhone S7

Marcus Herbrich (traducido por Francisco García), 12/25/PM

Copia del Samsung Galaxy S7. El actual modelo premium de los chinos elePhone llamado S7 ha pasado por nuestro set de pruebas. Su parecido externo con la contrapartida de Samsung es llamativo. Las especificaciones técnicas del elePhone S7 son muy prometedoras y la primera impresión también es positiva.

bien (79%) Elephone S7 Mediatek Helio X20 MT6797ARM Mali-T880 MP4 v6 - 12/22/PM
Dispositivo de pruebas cortesía de Elephone
(download rating image as PNG or SVG)
Elephone S7 (S Serie)
Procesador
Mediatek Helio X20 MT6797 2.3 GHz , MediaTek Helio X20
Adaptador gráfico
Memoría
4096 MB 
pantalla
5.5 pulgadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixels 401 PPI, capacitiva JDI LTPS OGS, LCD, IPS, lustroso: si
Disco duro
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 54.1 GB libre
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, Audio Conexiones: clavija headset 3.5mm, Card Reader: micro-SD (max. 128 GB), 1 Lector de Huellas Digitales, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: gravedad, luz, giroscopio, proximidad, brújula, OTG, Miracast, LED de estado
Equipamento de red
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM:B2/B3/B5/B8 (1900/1800/850/900 MHz) WCDMA:B1/B8 (2100/900 MHz) FDD-LTE:B1/B3/B7/B20 (2100/1800/2600/800 MHz) TDD-LTE:B38/B40(2600/2300 MHz), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 7.6 x 150.4 x 73.2
Battería
3000 mAh Litio-Polimero
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (cámara trasera f/2.2 con AF & flash LED)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Características adicionales
Altavoces: mono, Teclado: virtual, Luz de Teclado: si, cable USB, adaptador modular de corriente, cubierta de silicona, E-touch 2.0, 12 Meses Garantía, SAR rate (head): 0.265 W/kg, SAR rate (body): 0.507 W/kg, fanless
Peso
148 g, Suministro de Electricidad: 35 g
Precio
220 Euros

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
281 MBit/s ∼100% +1319%
Elephone S7
Mali-T880 MP4, Helio X20 MT6797, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
19.8 MBit/s ∼7%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
335 MBit/s ∼100% +475%
Elephone S7
Mali-T880 MP4, Helio X20 MT6797, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
58.3 MBit/s ∼17%
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
303 MBit/s ∼100%
UMI Super Euro Edition
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash (5.0 GHz)
109 MBit/s ∼36%
Blackview R7
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
102 MBit/s ∼34%
Vernee Mars
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
81.1 MBit/s ∼27%
Honor 5C
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.8 MBit/s ∼16%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
290 MBit/s ∼100%
UMI Super Euro Edition
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash (5.0 GHz)
108 MBit/s ∼37%
Blackview R7
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
79.4 MBit/s ∼27%
Honor 5C
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
58.3 MBit/s ∼20%
Vernee Mars
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
38.9 MBit/s ∼13%
elePhone S7
elePhone S7
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500

Comparación de Imágenes

Elige una escena y navega dentro de la primera imagen. Un click cambia el nivel de zoom. Un click en la imagen aumentada abre la original en una ventana nueva. La primera imagen muestra la fotografía escalada del dispositivo de pruebas.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
376
cd/m²
381
cd/m²
374
cd/m²
379
cd/m²
391
cd/m²
374
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
378
cd/m²
371
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 391 cd/m² Médio: 378.7 cd/m² Minimum: 204 cd/m²
iluminación: 95 %
Brillo con batería: 391 cd/m²
Contraste: 954:1 (Negro: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.2 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 9.8 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.27
Elephone S7
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
ZTE Blade V7
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Honor 5C
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
UMI Super Euro Edition
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Vernee Mars
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Blackview R7
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Screen
-1%
11%
29%
41%
-19%
52%
Brightness
379
411
8%
498
31%
410
8%
339
-11%
526
39%
552
46%
Brightness Distribution
95
96
1%
93
-2%
85
-11%
85
-11%
91
-4%
96
1%
Black Level *
0.41
0.38
7%
0.49
-20%
0.31
24%
0.14
66%
0.64
-56%
Contrast
954
1076
13%
1051
10%
1348
41%
2464
158%
863
-10%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
8.2
9.4
-15%
6.2
24%
4.4
46%
7.1
13%
11
-34%
1.59
81%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
9.8
11.6
-18%
7.4
24%
3.6
63%
6.7
32%
14.3
-46%
2.01
79%
Gamma
2.27 106%
2.25 107%
2.28 105%
2.36 102%
2.47 97%
2.21 109%
2.01 119%
CCT
10108 64%
9597 68%
8664 75%
6993 93%
7711 84%
12996 50%
6321 103%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
82.12
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.98

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 59 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 655 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 28740) Hz.

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
23 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 7 ms subida
↘ 17 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 20 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (27.3 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
47 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 10 ms subida
↘ 37 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 276 (máximo) ms. » 71 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (43 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Elephone S7
69122 Points ∼37%
ZTE Blade V7
37070 Points ∼20% -46%
Honor 5C
53143 Points ∼29% -23%
UMI Super Euro Edition
50072 Points ∼27% -28%
Vernee Mars
51008 Points ∼28% -26%
Blackview R7
50572 Points ∼27% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
128749 Points ∼70% +86%
Huawei P9 Plus
98413 Points ∼53% +42%
Geekbench 4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Elephone S7
3827 Points ∼18%
UMI Super Euro Edition
2818 Points ∼13% -26%
Vernee Mars
2903 Points ∼14% -24%
Blackview R7
2851 Points ∼13% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
5503 Points ∼26% +44%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Elephone S7
1545 Points ∼30%
UMI Super Euro Edition
727 Points ∼14% -53%
Vernee Mars
729 Points ∼14% -53%
Blackview R7
728 Points ∼14% -53%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
1840 Points ∼36% +19%
3DMark
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.1 Physics (ordenar por valor)
Elephone S7
975 Points ∼38%
ZTE Blade V7
914 Points ∼36% -6%
Honor 5C
1418 Points ∼56% +45%
UMI Super Euro Edition
1117 Points ∼44% +15%
Vernee Mars
1338 Points ∼52% +37%
Blackview R7
1242 Points ∼49% +27%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2121 (min: 1594) Points ∼83% +118%
Huawei P9 Plus
2547 Points ∼100% +161%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.1 Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Elephone S7
493 Points ∼9%
ZTE Blade V7
159 Points ∼3% -68%
Honor 5C
317 Points ∼6% -36%
UMI Super Euro Edition
350 Points ∼7% -29%
Vernee Mars
356 Points ∼7% -28%
Blackview R7
352 Points ∼7% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2229 (min: 2043) Points ∼41% +352%
Huawei P9 Plus
807 Points ∼15% +64%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.1 (ordenar por valor)
Elephone S7
554 Points ∼14%
ZTE Blade V7
195 Points ∼5% -65%
Honor 5C
383 Points ∼10% -31%
UMI Super Euro Edition
413 Points ∼11% -25%
Vernee Mars
425 Points ∼11% -23%
Blackview R7
419 Points ∼11% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2204 (min: 1923) Points ∼57% +298%
Huawei P9 Plus
952 Points ∼25% +72%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordenar por valor)
Elephone S7
757 Points ∼29%
ZTE Blade V7
944 Points ∼36% +25%
Honor 5C
1418 Points ∼55% +87%
UMI Super Euro Edition
1144 Points ∼44% +51%
Vernee Mars
1100 Points ∼43% +45%
Blackview R7
1155 Points ∼45% +53%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2002 (min: 1539) Points ∼77% +164%
Huawei P9 Plus
2336 Points ∼90% +209%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Elephone S7
614 Points ∼8%
ZTE Blade V7
245 Points ∼3% -60%
Honor 5C
480 Points ∼6% -22%
UMI Super Euro Edition
523 Points ∼7% -15%
Vernee Mars
523 Points ∼7% -15%
Blackview R7
518 Points ∼7% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3015 (min: 2895) Points ∼39% +391%
Huawei P9 Plus
1042 Points ∼13% +70%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordenar por valor)
Elephone S7
641 Points ∼13%
ZTE Blade V7
293 Points ∼6% -54%
Honor 5C
563 Points ∼12% -12%
UMI Super Euro Edition
595 Points ∼12% -7%
Vernee Mars
602 Points ∼12% -6%
Blackview R7
590 Points ∼12% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2710 (min: 2421) Points ∼56% +323%
Huawei P9 Plus
1188 Points ∼24% +85%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordenar por valor)
Elephone S7
9718 Points ∼14%
ZTE Blade V7
10430 Points ∼15% +7%
Honor 5C
13588 Points ∼20% +40%
UMI Super Euro Edition
11654 Points ∼17% +20%
Vernee Mars
10762 Points ∼16% +11%
Blackview R7
12585 Points ∼19% +30%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
19610 Points ∼29% +102%
Huawei P9 Plus
15331 Points ∼23% +58%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordenar por valor)
Elephone S7
12649 Points ∼3%
ZTE Blade V7
6170 Points ∼1% -51%
Honor 5C
11319 Points ∼3% -11%
UMI Super Euro Edition
10567 Points ∼2% -16%
Vernee Mars
10685 Points ∼2% -16%
Blackview R7
10334 Points ∼2% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
33031 Points ∼7% +161%
Huawei P9 Plus
21807 Points ∼5% +72%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordenar por valor)
Elephone S7
11854 Points ∼6%
ZTE Blade V7
6786 Points ∼4% -43%
Honor 5C
11755 Points ∼6% -1%
UMI Super Euro Edition
10791 Points ∼6% -9%
Vernee Mars
10702 Points ∼6% -10%
Blackview R7
10762 Points ∼6% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28671 Points ∼15% +142%
Huawei P9 Plus
19936 Points ∼10% +68%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Elephone S7
13 fps ∼1%
ZTE Blade V7
12 fps ∼1% -8%
Honor 5C
19 fps ∼2% +46%
UMI Super Euro Edition
17 fps ∼2% +31%
Vernee Mars
17 fps ∼2% +31%
Blackview R7
17 fps ∼2% +31%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
81 fps ∼7% +523%
Huawei P9 Plus
41 fps ∼4% +215%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Elephone S7
14 fps ∼3%
ZTE Blade V7
12 fps ∼3% -14%
Honor 5C
20 fps ∼4% +43%
UMI Super Euro Edition
18 fps ∼4% +29%
Vernee Mars
18 fps ∼4% +29%
Blackview R7
17 fps ∼4% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
51 fps ∼11% +264%
Huawei P9 Plus
43 fps ∼9% +207%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Elephone S7
5.9 fps ∼1%
ZTE Blade V7
4.5 fps ∼1% -24%
Honor 5C
7.9 fps ∼1% +34%
UMI Super Euro Edition
7.1 fps ∼1% +20%
Vernee Mars
7.1 fps ∼1% +20%
Blackview R7
4.7 fps ∼1% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
38 fps ∼7% +544%
Huawei P9 Plus
18 fps ∼3% +205%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Elephone S7
6.5 fps ∼3%
ZTE Blade V7
4.5 fps ∼2% -31%
Honor 5C
8.4 fps ∼4% +29%
UMI Super Euro Edition
7.5 fps ∼3% +15%
Vernee Mars
7.6 fps ∼3% +17%
Blackview R7
4.7 fps ∼2% -28%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
27 fps ∼12% +315%
Huawei P9 Plus
19 fps ∼8% +192%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
Elephone S7
6.1 fps ∼2%
ZTE Blade V7
2.9 fps ∼1% -52%
Honor 5C
4.5 fps ∼2% -26%
UMI Super Euro Edition
4.7 fps ∼2% -23%
Vernee Mars
4.8 fps ∼2% -21%
Blackview R7
2.5 fps ∼1% -59%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28 fps ∼9% +359%
Huawei P9 Plus
10 fps ∼3% +64%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
Elephone S7
5.7 fps ∼3%
ZTE Blade V7
2.9 fps ∼2% -49%
Honor 5C
4.9 fps ∼3% -14%
UMI Super Euro Edition
5.1 fps ∼3% -11%
Vernee Mars
5.1 fps ∼3% -11%
Blackview R7
2.5 fps ∼1% -56%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps ∼9% +163%
Huawei P9 Plus
11 fps ∼6% +93%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor)
Elephone S7
4433 Points ∼55%
ZTE Blade V7
3947 Points ∼49% -11%
Honor 5C
5120 Points ∼63% +15%
UMI Super Euro Edition
4596 Points ∼57% +4%
Vernee Mars
4554 Points ∼56% +3%
Blackview R7
4364 Points ∼54% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4660 Points ∼57% +5%
Huawei P9 Plus
7159 Points ∼88% +61%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordenar por valor)
Elephone S7
888 Points ∼58%
ZTE Blade V7
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Honor 5C
707 Points ∼46% -20%
UMI Super Euro Edition
771 Points ∼50% -13%
Vernee Mars
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Blackview R7
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
994 Points ∼64% +12%
Huawei P9 Plus
1049 Points ∼68% +18%
Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Elephone S7
1517 Points ∼18%
ZTE Blade V7
430 Points ∼5% -72%
Honor 5C
814 Points ∼9% -46%
UMI Super Euro Edition
666 Points ∼8% -56%
Vernee Mars
665 Points ∼8% -56%
Blackview R7
655 Points ∼8% -57%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2203 Points ∼26% +45%
Huawei P9 Plus
1512 Points ∼18% 0%
Memory (ordenar por valor)
Elephone S7
1265 Points ∼33%
ZTE Blade V7
790 Points ∼21% -38%
Honor 5C
1504 Points ∼39% +19%
UMI Super Euro Edition
1052 Points ∼27% -17%
Vernee Mars
1005 Points ∼26% -21%
Blackview R7
1030 Points ∼27% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2072 Points ∼54% +64%
Huawei P9 Plus
2667 Points ∼69% +111%
System (ordenar por valor)
Elephone S7
3252 Points ∼49%
ZTE Blade V7
1188 Points ∼18% -63%
Honor 5C
2600 Points ∼40% -20%
UMI Super Euro Edition
2187 Points ∼33% -33%
Vernee Mars
2291 Points ∼35% -30%
Blackview R7
1971 Points ∼30% -39%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4080 Points ∼62% +25%
Huawei P9 Plus
3932 Points ∼60% +21%
Overall (ordenar por valor)
Elephone S7
1534 Points ∼47%
ZTE Blade V7
249 Points ∼8% -84%
Honor 5C
1225 Points ∼37% -20%
UMI Super Euro Edition
1043 Points ∼32% -32%
Vernee Mars
348 Points ∼11% -77%
Blackview R7
338 Points ∼10% -78%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2074 Points ∼63% +35%
Huawei P9 Plus
2019 Points ∼62% +32%

Leyenda

 
Elephone S7 Mediatek Helio X20 MT6797, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V7 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 5C HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
UMI Super Euro Edition Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Vernee Mars Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Blackview R7 Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Huawei P9 Plus HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
ZTE Blade V7 (Chrome Version 50)
13761.1 ms * ∼100% -328%
Blackview R7 (Chrome Version 52)
9748.3 ms * ∼71% -203%
UMI Super Euro Edition (Chrome 53)
9410.2 ms * ∼68% -192%
Vernee Mars (Chrome Version 54)
9376.1 ms * ∼68% -191%
Honor 5C (Chrome 51)
9111.2 ms * ∼66% -183%
Elephone S7 (Chrome Version 55)
3217.8 ms * ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Samsung Browser 4.0.01-81)
2564.1 ms * ∼19% +20%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Samsung Browser 4.0.01-81)
13191 Points ∼100% +249%
Honor 5C (Chrome 51)
4188 Points ∼32% +11%
UMI Super Euro Edition (Chrome 53)
4117 Points ∼31% +9%
Vernee Mars (Chrome Version 54)
4073 Points ∼31% +8%
Blackview R7 (Chrome Version 52)
3885 Points ∼29% +3%
Elephone S7 (Chrome Version 55)
3780 Points ∼29%
ZTE Blade V7 (Chrome Version 50)
2689 Points ∼20% -29%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Samsung Browser 4.0.01-81)
75.12 Points ∼100% +67%
Elephone S7 (Chrome Version 55)
45.033 Points ∼60%
Honor 5C (Chrome 51)
27.934 Points ∼37% -38%
Vernee Mars (Chrome Version 54)
27.099 Points ∼36% -40%
UMI Super Euro Edition (Chrome 53)
26.211 Points ∼35% -42%
Blackview R7 (Chrome Version 52)
25.349 Points ∼34% -44%
ZTE Blade V7 (Chrome Version 50)
18.19 Points ∼24% -60%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Elephone S7
Mali-T880 MP4, Helio X20 MT6797, 64 GB eMMC Flash
ZTE Blade V7
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Honor 5C
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
UMI Super Euro Edition
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Vernee Mars
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Blackview R7
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
AndroBench 3-5
-2%
56%
14%
21%
-5%
136%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
18.57 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
20.89 ( Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
12%
24.21 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
30%
17.88 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-4%
24
29%
11.87
-36%
50.36 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
171%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
32.86 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
43.67 ( Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
33%
51.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
58%
36.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
10%
44.5
35%
15.56
-53%
76.43 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
133%
Random Write 4KB
7.89
7.58
-4%
15.7
99%
11.88
51%
15.77
100%
11.4
44%
15.79
100%
Random Read 4KB
21.8
28.07
29%
61.7
183%
28.17
29%
21.66
-1%
28.02
29%
86.71
298%
Sequential Write 256KB
167.07
39.45
-76%
75.5
-55%
126.95
-24%
71.58
-57%
122.67
-27%
145.11
-13%
Sequential Read 256KB
213.8
196.76
-8%
263
23%
257.8
21%
255.87
20%
247.58
16%
487.34
128%
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguracionesValor
 high34 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguracionesValor
 high27 fps
 very low30 fps
Carga Máx.
 37.5 °C37.1 °C35.6 °C 
 37.4 °C37.3 °C36.5 °C 
 36 °C34.8 °C36.2 °C 
Máximo: 37.5 °C
Médio: 36.5 °C
33 °C33.9 °C42.4 °C
32.5 °C34.5 °C42.2 °C
32.7 °C33.7 °C39.4 °C
Máximo: 42.4 °C
Médio: 36 °C
Conector de corriente  35.7 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.637.82525.434.73125.333.74032.934.15033.641.26331.636.28028.424.81002725.212520.822.91602227.920021.327.525020.833.131521.240.940019.446.850019.553.163017.760.380017.967.6100017.874.5125017.378.1160017.476.9200016.777.1250017.277.3315018.281.4400017.984.9500017.680.1630017.774.7800017.873.51000017.974.11250018.172.41600018.261.6SPL3090.5N1.374median 17.9Elephone S7median 72.4Delta1.316.140.632.932.440.641.629.831.341.634.532.131.734.538.140.92638.134.437.839.434.425.627.836.225.629.727.928.629.733.127.525.433.134.924.821.334.941.320.623.341.34526.122.54552.531.322.452.557.837.821.357.859.639.918.459.663.445.417.563.469.950.817.569.971.553.117.271.572.255.216.872.274.757.817.374.774.957.717.474.977.959.416.677.980.361.817.380.380.760.817.680.776.154.717.676.175.954.617.775.979.760.517.479.773.354.317.773.367.849.717.967.866.847.718.166.858.133.518.158.188.769.729.888.773.823.11.373.8median 69.9Samsung Galaxy S7 Edgemedian 50.8median 17.7median 69.99.911.71.69.932.537.232.432.532.733.631.332.723.531.231.723.530.833.52630.841.139.139.441.132.933.436.232.928.930.728.628.926.425.825.426.427.324.821.327.328.325.823.328.332.62422.532.638.624.722.438.646.432.421.346.454.537.518.454.55942.917.55959.549.517.559.562.750.117.262.766.952.516.866.971.155.517.371.175.358.217.475.379.162.916.679.180.463.817.380.479.162.217.679.177.660.117.677.675.357.417.775.374.657.417.474.674.356.517.774.372.354.517.972.364.145.818.164.146.227.918.146.287.971.229.887.964.123.81.364.1median 64.1Honor 5Cmedian 50.1median 17.7median 64.114.612.21.614.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Elephone S7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.54 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 42.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 43%
Compared to all devices tested
» 88% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 43%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Honor 5C audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 43%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.18 / 0.37 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.42 / 1.87 / 2.11 Watt
Carga midlight 6.16 / 10.67 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Elephone S7
3000 mAh
ZTE Blade V7
2540 mAh
Honor 5C
3000 mAh
UMI Super Euro Edition
4000 mAh
Vernee Mars
3000 mAh
Blackview R7
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3600 mAh
Power Consumption
45%
24%
14%
23%
-29%
33%
Idle Minimum *
1.42
0.73
49%
0.89
37%
0.84
41%
1.02
28%
1.83
-29%
0.63
56%
Idle Average *
1.87
0.92
51%
2.07
-11%
1.94
-4%
1.69
10%
3.21
-72%
1.1
41%
Idle Maximum *
2.11
0.93
56%
2.15
-2%
2.07
2%
1.82
14%
3.45
-64%
1.56
26%
Load Average *
6.16
4.47
27%
3.46
44%
5.88
5%
4.39
29%
5.67
8%
5.95
3%
Load Maximum *
10.67
5.96
44%
5.18
51%
7.67
28%
6.79
36%
9.16
14%
6.7
37%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
8h 03min
Navegando con WLAN v1.3
3h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 34min
Carga (máximo brillo)
2h 48min
Elephone S7
3000 mAh
ZTE Blade V7
2540 mAh
Honor 5C
3000 mAh
UMI Super Euro Edition
4000 mAh
Vernee Mars
3000 mAh
Blackview R7
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3600 mAh
Duración de Batería
133%
85%
173%
91%
85%
195%
Reader / Idle
483
997
106%
1254
160%
1663
244%
Load
168
156
-7%
392
133%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
223
519
133%
584
162%
638
186%
427
91%
412
85%
732
228%
H.264
334
602
80%
914
174%

Pro

+ panel IPS Full HD
+ 4 GB de RAM
+ 64 GB de almacenamiento
+ dual-SIM
+ diseño & looks
+ construcción
+ lector de huellas

Contra

- módulo WiFi
- defectos de rendimiento
- altavoz
- cámara
- almacenamiento eMMC lento
- brillo mínimo
ElePhone S7. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de ElePhone.
ElePhone S7. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de ElePhone.

Si tuvieramos que resumir el elePhone S7 en una frase, nuestro veredicto exagerado sería: bonito a la vista, pero sin mucha sustancia.

El aspecto y la construcción de la carcasa son muy buenos para su nivel de precios. El panel IPS es bastante nítido y suficientemente brillante en el uso diario. También nos gustó bastante la calidad de llamaday el lector de huellas de buen funcionamiento.

El poco aguante de batería, causado por la ineficiente gestión de energía por un lado, y el altísimo brillo mínimo de la pantalla por la otra, no dicen nada a favor del smartphone elePhone. Lo que es más, el rendimiento no está al nivel de sus rivales directos a pesar del alto rendimiento de los  SoCs MediaTek. Otros puntos de crítica, tales como la RAM lenta, la mediocre calidad de cámara y altavoz, y las bajas tasas de transmisión del módulo WiFi, no resultan en un concepto totalmente redondo. El Honor 5C o el Vernee Mars (ambos disponibles en Alemania a través de compañías de importación) son, a nuestro parecer, mejores alternativas.

Hace falta el original para tener una experiencia Galaxy S7 - al m enos el elePhone S7 no es realmente una alternativa. El smartphone de gama media tampoco nos terminó de convencer en la comparación con la competición directa.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Elephone S7 - 12/22/PM v6
Marcus Herbrich

Acabado
86%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Ratón
84%
Conectividad
41 / 60 → 68%
Peso
93%
Battería
78%
Pantalla
80%
Rendimiento de juegos
26 / 63 → 41%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
51 / 70 → 72%
Temperatura
90%
Ruido
100%
Audio
59 / 91 → 65%
Cámara
60%
Médio
70%
79%
Smartphone - media ponderada

Pricecompare

> Español - Home > Análisis > Breve análisis del Smartphone ElePhone S7
Marcus Herbrich, 2016-12-25 (Update: 2016-12-25)