Notebookcheck Logo

Breve análisis del Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895 (Core i3)

Portátil business barato. Acer ofrece el TravelMate P249-M por 550 Euros. Este portátil de 14" es silencioso, tiene buen aguante de batería, y una garantía de tres años. Además, este TravelMate tiene iluminación en el teclado y una ranura M.2 libre.
Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895 (TravelMate P249 Serie)
Procesador
Intel Core i3-6100U 2 x 2.3 GHz, Skylake
Adaptador gráfico
Intel HD Graphics 520, Núcleo: 950 MHz, monocanal, 20.19.15.4501
Memoría
4 GB 
, DDR4-2400, monocanal, dos ranuras (1 ocupada)
pantalla
14.00 pulgadas 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixels 112 PPI, AU Optronics B140XTN02.E, TN LED, lustroso: no
Placa base
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Disco duro
Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0, 500 GB 
, 5400 rpm, 190 GB libre
Tarjeta de sonido
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Conexiones: audio combinado, Card Reader: SD, TPM 2.0
Equipamento de red
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0
Unidad óptica
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUE1N
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 30.4 x 346 x 248
Battería
41 Wh Litio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 7 Professional (64 Bit) + Windows 10 Pro (64 Bit)
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionales
Altavoces: estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Luz de Teclado: si, MS Office 365 (prueba), McAfee LiveSafe Internet Security (prueba), 24 Meses Garantía
Peso
2.1 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 267 g
Precio
599 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000
 
73.2 MB/s +344%
HP ProBook 440 G3
 
72.3 MB/s +338%
Dell Latitude 14 3470
 
23.5 MB/s +42%
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
 
19.1 MB/s +16%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
 
17.3 MB/s +5%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895
 
16.5 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP ProBook 440 G3
 
86.4 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000
 
85.1 MB/s
Dell Latitude 14 3470
 
27.6 MB/s
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
 
26.1 MB/s
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (jseb)
563 MBit/s +23%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
458 MBit/s
Dell Latitude 14 3470
Atheros AR5BWB222 Wireless Network Adapter
165 MBit/s -64%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
92 MBit/s -80%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (jseb)
547 MBit/s +482%
Dell Latitude 14 3470
Atheros AR5BWB222 Wireless Network Adapter
143 MBit/s +52%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
94 MBit/s
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
91 MBit/s -3%
229
cd/m²
220
cd/m²
229
cd/m²
213
cd/m²
218
cd/m²
223
cd/m²
190
cd/m²
186
cd/m²
222
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
AU Optronics B140XTN02.E tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 229 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 214.4 cd/m² Minimum: 24 cd/m²
iluminación: 81 %
Brillo con batería: 217 cd/m²
Contraste: 436:1 (Negro: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 11.68 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 13.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
52% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
33% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
35.84% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
52.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
34.69% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895
TN LED, 1366x768, 14.00
HP ProBook 440 G3
TN, 1920x1080, 14.00
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000
IPS-Panel, 1920x1080, 14.00
Dell Latitude 14 3470
TN LED, 1366x768, 14.00
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
TN LED, 1920x1080, 14.00
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Display
14%
13%
16%
10%
7%
Display P3 Coverage
34.69
39.6
14%
39.1
13%
40.21
16%
38.15
10%
36.97
7%
sRGB Coverage
52.2
59.1
13%
58.8
13%
60.5
16%
56.7
9%
55.6
7%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
35.84
40.94
14%
40.41
13%
41.55
16%
39.48
10%
38.2
7%
Response Times
-16%
1%
-14%
12%
-12%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
41 ?(20, 21)
46 ?(24, 22)
-12%
40 ?(17, 23)
2%
47 ?(25, 22)
-15%
44 ?(23, 21)
-7%
42 ?(15, 27)
-2%
Response Time Black / White *
23 ?(6, 17)
27.6 ?(11.2, 16.4)
-20%
23.2 ?(6.8, 16.4)
-1%
26 ?(18, 8)
-13%
16 ?(10, 6)
30%
28 ?(8, 20)
-22%
PWM Frequency
50 ?(10)
Screen
13%
33%
3%
17%
43%
Brightness middle
218
246
13%
233
7%
206
-6%
249
14%
230
6%
Brightness
214
215
0%
221
3%
193
-10%
238
11%
226
6%
Brightness Distribution
81
84
4%
88
9%
87
7%
87
7%
86
6%
Black Level *
0.5
0.5
-0%
0.3
40%
0.48
4%
0.41
18%
0.2
60%
Contrast
436
492
13%
777
78%
429
-2%
607
39%
1150
164%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
11.68
8.6
26%
4.43
62%
11
6%
9.09
22%
5.07
57%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
17.66
19.57
-11%
14.64
17%
10.07
43%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
13.1
9.36
29%
3.78
71%
11.51
12%
9.92
24%
3.64
72%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.39 92%
2.31 95%
2.23 99%
2.42 91%
2.46 89%
CCT
15815 41%
11226 58%
7171 91%
13671 48%
11177 58%
6521 100%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
33
37.8
15%
37.3
13%
38.46
17%
36.5
11%
35
6%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
52
59.1
14%
58.7
13%
60.61
17%
56.7
9%
55
6%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
4% / 9%
16% / 24%
2% / 4%
13% / 15%
13% / 28%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 18110 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 3846000) Hz.

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
23 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 6 ms subida
↘ 17 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 45 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (21.6 ms).
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
41 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 20 ms subida
↘ 21 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 59 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (33.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
3714
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
8426
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6061
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
98 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
250 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
31.85 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
ayuda
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
Intel Core i7-6500U
130 Points +33%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel Core i5-6200U
117 Points +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000
Intel Core i5-6200U
114 Points +16%
HP ProBook 440 G3
Intel Core i5-6200U
114 Points +16%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895
Intel Core i3-6100U
98 Points
Dell Latitude 14 3470
Intel Core i3-6100U
97 Points -1%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
Intel Core i7-6500U
324 Points +30%
HP ProBook 440 G3
Intel Core i5-6200U
294 Points +18%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel Core i5-6200U
294 Points +18%
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000
Intel Core i5-6200U
290 Points +16%
Dell Latitude 14 3470
Intel Core i3-6100U
250 Points 0%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895
Intel Core i3-6100U
250 Points
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
Intel Core i7-6500U
3191 Points +42%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel Core i5-6200U
2952 Points +31%
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000
Intel Core i5-6200U
2576 Points +14%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895
Intel Core i3-6100U
2251 Points
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
Intel Core i7-6500U
6723 Points +37%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel Core i5-6200U
6088 Points +24%
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000
Intel Core i5-6200U
5530 Points +13%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895
Intel Core i3-6100U
4907 Points
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
Intel Core i7-6500U
3906 Points +37%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel Core i5-6200U
3601 Points +26%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895
Intel Core i3-6100U
2861 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
Intel Core i7-6500U
7303 Points +37%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel Core i5-6200U
6780 Points +27%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895
Intel Core i3-6100U
5320 Points
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
Intel Core i7-6500U
213.8 Points +49%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel Core i5-6200U
193.4 Points +35%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel Core i5-6200U
97.6 Points -32%
HP ProBook 440 G3
Intel Core i5-6200U
189.1 Points +32%
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000
Intel Core i5-6200U
174.3 Points +21%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895
Intel Core i3-6100U
143.5 Points
Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895
Intel Core i3-6100U
94.2 Points -34%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3149 puntos
ayuda
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Liteonit CV3-8D512
3545 Points +13%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
3472 Points +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000
Radeon R7 M360, 6200U, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS
3415 Points +8%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895
HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0
3149 Points
Dell Latitude 14 3470
HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Toshiba MQ01ACF050
3074 Points -2%
HP ProBook 440 G3
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630
2871 Points -9%
There is no securing mechanism for the M.2 SSD.
There is no securing mechanism for the M.2 SSD.
Not what the manufacturer had in mind,...
Not what the manufacturer had in mind,...
...but an M.2 SSD could also be secured like this.
...but an M.2 SSD could also be secured like this.
Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0
Tasa de Transferencia Mínima: 37.6 MB/s
Tasa de Transferencia Máxima: 110.2 MB/s
Tasa de Transferencia Promedio: 80.9 MB/s
Tiempo de Acceso: 18.5 ms
Velocidad de Ráfagas: 125.3 MB/s
Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895
Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0
HP ProBook 440 G3
Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000
Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS
Dell Latitude 14 3470
Toshiba MQ01ACF050
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
Liteonit CV3-8D512
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
4%
2110%
-23%
7741%
7452%
Read Seq
104.7
124.8
19%
497.6
375%
108.9
4%
510
387%
484.1
362%
Write Seq
104.2
123.6
19%
180
73%
103.2
-1%
267.2
156%
449.8
332%
Read 512
39.38
42.34
8%
297.1
654%
347.6
783%
399.1
913%
Write 512
58.3
61.9
6%
169.1
190%
267.5
359%
355.1
509%
Read 4k
0.501
0.559
12%
18.91
3674%
0.362
-28%
33.12
6511%
33.44
6575%
Write 4k
1.368
1.277
-7%
37.13
2614%
0.946
-31%
95.9
6910%
67.5
4834%
Read 4k QD32
1.395
1.179
-15%
95.7
6760%
0.721
-48%
392.8
28058%
368.5
26316%
Write 4k QD32
1.412
1.304
-8%
37.26
2539%
0.901
-36%
266.4
18767%
280.6
19773%
3DMark 11 Performance
1221 puntos
ayuda
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000
AMD Radeon R7 M360, Intel Core i5-6200U
1989 Points +76%
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
1481 Points +31%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1343 Points +19%
HP ProBook 440 G3
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1143 Points +1%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6100U
1131 Points
Dell Latitude 14 3470
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6100U
1063 Points -6%
bajo medio alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 35.4 21.1 16.3

Ruido

Ocioso
33.8 / 33.8 / 33.8 dB(A)
Carga
33.8 / 34.4 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 31.6 dB(A)
Carga Máx.
 30 °C26.4 °C23 °C 
 30.1 °C29.2 °C23.3 °C 
 28.7 °C28 °C25.1 °C 
Máximo: 30.1 °C
Médio: 27.1 °C
22.8 °C24.4 °C30.1 °C
23.3 °C28 °C31.2 °C
26.9 °C27.4 °C29 °C
Máximo: 31.2 °C
Médio: 27 °C
Conector de corriente  39.4 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 20.5 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.7 °C / 83.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-1 °C / -1.8 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.638.139.62539.435.839.43137.934.837.94040.233.640.25038.132.938.16342.535.242.58042.130.742.11004228.94212542.127.842.116044.226.544.220047.427.647.425051.824.951.831556.52556.540057.22357.25005922.65963065.221.465.280067.621.167.6100062.820.262.812505919.959160059.119.559.120006319.263250062.419.662.4315069.519.369.5400073.619.373.6500071.319.371.3630068.419.368.4800065.919.265.91000067.318.967.31250066.518.666.51600062.618.962.6SPL79.732.479.7N44.11.844.1median 62.6median 19.9median 62.6Delta7.31.97.335.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAcer TravelMate P249-M-3895Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 1.8 / 2.3 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 6.1 / 8.4 / 10.2 Watt
Carga midlight 27 / 26 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
WiFi Websurfing (IE 11)
6h 46min
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895
6100U, HD Graphics 520, 41 Wh
406 min
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 41 Wh
400 min -1%
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
6500U, HD Graphics 520, 48.9 Wh
392 min -3%
HP ProBook 440 G3
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 44 Wh
293 min -28%
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000
6200U, Radeon R7 M360, 47 Wh
292 min -28%
Dell Latitude 14 3470
6100U, HD Graphics 520, 41 Wh
278 min -32%

Pro

+ silencioso
+ apenas se calienta
+ teclado iluminado
+ ranura M.2 libre
+ escotilla de mantenimiento
+ buen aguante de batería
+ 3 años de garantía

Contra

- display oscuro con poco contraste y escaso ángulo de visión
- sin USB Type-C
- lector de tarjetas lento

El modelo básico de la serie TravelMate P249-M está equipado con un procesador Core i3 Skylake. Como tal, el modelo de pruebas tiene bastante rendimiento para las tareas diarias. El portátil apenas se calienta y es silencioso. Para asegurar un silencio total, uno podría cambiar el HDD por un SSD fácilmente gracias a la escotilla de mantenimiento del TravelMate. El aguante de batería es decente y el teclado (iluminado) es bastante bueno. El fabricante ofrece 3 años de garantía. Como el panel FHD del recientemente testado top model de la serie TravelMate, la pantalla de nuestro modelo de pruebas es mala, oscura, poco contraste, y limitado ángulo de visión.

Por 550 Euros, el usuario recibe el TravelMate P249-M-3895. Este portátil de 14" es un buen dispositivo básico para el mundo business. El display es su talón de Aquiles.

Si buscas una pantalla IPS genial, recomendamos el TravelMate X349-M. Este modelo también trae un procesador Core i3 por menos de 600 Euros. A diferencia del modelo básico del P249-M, el X349-M está equipado con un panel Full HD IPS, un SSD, y una delgada y estilosa carcasa de aluminio.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895 - 11/03/2016 v5.1(old)
Sascha Mölck

Acabado
80 / 98 → 81%
Teclado
85%
Ratón
87%
Conectividad
44 / 80 → 55%
Peso
62 / 20-67 → 89%
Battería
89%
Pantalla
74%
Rendimiento de juegos
53 / 68 → 78%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
69 / 92 → 75%
Temperatura
95%
Ruido
85%
Audio
53%
Cámara
40 / 85 → 47%
Médio
70%
80%
Office - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895 (Core i3)
Sascha Mölck, 2016-11-12 (Update: 2016-11-12)