Notebookcheck Logo

Breve análisis del Convertible HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng

Display tenue. Por 600 Euros te llevas un procesador Kaby-Lake, pantalla IPS, y un HDD de 1TB. El soporte de un active stylus será una característica adicional para algunos.
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng (Pavilion x360 Serie)
Procesador
Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake
Adaptador gráfico
Intel HD Graphics 620, Núcleo: 1000 MHz, monocanal, 21.20.16.4526
Memoría
8 GB 
, DDR3-1867, monocanal, dos ranuras de memoria (una ocupada)
pantalla
15.60 pulgadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels 141 PPI, capacitiva con soporte active-stylus (pero sin niveles de presión), LG Philips, IPS, Full-HD, superficie lustrosa, lustroso: si
Placa base
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Disco duro
WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0, 1000 GB 
, 5400 rpm, 880 GB libre
Tarjeta de sonido
Realtek ALC282 @ Intel Sunrise Point-LP PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Conexiones: audio combinado, Card Reader: SD, Sensores: acelerómetro, giroscopio, proximidad, TPM 2.0
Equipamento de red
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 23.9 x 382 x 250
Battería
48 Wh Litio-Ion, Duración de la Batería (según el fabricante): 9 h
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionales
Altavoces: estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Luz de Teclado: no, Cyberlink Power Media Player 14, Cyberlink PowerDirector 14, McAfee LiveSafe (demo), MS Office 365 (demo), 12 Meses Garantía
Peso
2.3 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 300 g
Precio
599 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
 
79 MB/s +31%
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
 
74.2 MB/s +23%
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
 
60.5 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
 
59.7 MB/s -1%
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
 
21 MB/s -65%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
 
87 MB/s
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
 
85.6 MB/s -2%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
 
85.3 MB/s -2%
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
 
85.1 MB/s -2%
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
 
26.5 MB/s -70%
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
372 MBit/s
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
125 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
390 MBit/s
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
103 MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AX12
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
314 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
352 MBit/s
166
cd/m²
189
cd/m²
211
cd/m²
161
cd/m²
205
cd/m²
219
cd/m²
166
cd/m²
189
cd/m²
210
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
LG Philips tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 219 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 190.7 cd/m²
iluminación: 74 %
Brillo con batería: 205 cd/m²
Contraste: 683:1 (Negro: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.86 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
59% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.76% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.45% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display
6%
6%
-4%
8%
Display P3 Coverage
39.45
41.84
6%
41.78
6%
38.04
-4%
42.58
8%
sRGB Coverage
59.2
62.7
6%
62.9
6%
57.1
-4%
63.9
8%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
40.76
43.25
6%
43.17
6%
39.3
-4%
43.99
8%
Response Times
120%
185%
20%
2%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
55 ?(23, 32)
30.8 ?(12.8, 18)
44%
53 ?(20, 33)
4%
42 ?(19, 23)
24%
43.2 ?(19.6, 23.6)
21%
Response Time Black / White *
26 ?(10, 16)
22 ?(11.2, 10.8)
15%
39 ?(12, 27)
-50%
22 ?(6, 16)
15%
30.8 ?(17.6, 13.2)
-18%
PWM Frequency
50 ?(20)
200 ?(90)
300%
350 ?(60)
600%
Screen
26%
16%
23%
25%
Brightness middle
205
225
10%
243
19%
266
30%
254
24%
Brightness
191
210
10%
248
30%
249
30%
230
20%
Brightness Distribution
74
85
15%
91
23%
85
15%
86
16%
Black Level *
0.3
0.22
27%
0.32
-7%
0.26
13%
0.26
13%
Contrast
683
1023
50%
759
11%
1023
50%
977
43%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
7.2
4.13
43%
5.44
24%
4.98
31%
4.23
41%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
12.7
9.36
26%
9.73
23%
11.82
7%
9.5
25%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.86
2.53
63%
4.74
31%
2.68
61%
2.87
58%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.6 85%
2.38 92%
2.27 97%
2.35 94%
CCT
6983 93%
6360 102%
7799 83%
6583 99%
5965 109%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
38
39.8
5%
39.6
4%
36
-5%
40.35
6%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
59
62.5
6%
62.5
6%
57
-3%
63.48
8%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
51% / 40%
69% / 46%
13% / 17%
12% / 19%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado 50 Hz ≤ 20 % de brillo

La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 50 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 20 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM.

La frecuencia de 50 Hz es bajísima, por lo que el parpadeo puede causar fatiga visual y cefaleas cuando se usa mucho tiempo.

Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 18110 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 3846000) Hz.

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
26 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 10 ms subida
↘ 16 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 57 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21.6 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
55 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 23 ms subida
↘ 32 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 90 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (33.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4787
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
11328
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
7282
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
126 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
326 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
35.12 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.7 %
ayuda
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
Intel Core i5-7200U
130 Points +3%
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
Intel Core i7-6500U
128 Points +2%
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
126 Points
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U
114 Points -10%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
Intel Core i5-6200U
113 Points -10%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
Intel Core i5-7200U
332 Points +2%
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
326 Points
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
Intel Core i7-6500U
308 Points -6%
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U
289 Points -11%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
Intel Core i5-6200U
284 Points -13%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
11328 Points
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U
9846 Points -13%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
Intel Core i5-6200U
9723 Points -14%
Rendering Single 32Bit
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
4787 Points
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U
4399 Points -8%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
Intel Core i5-6200U
4368 Points -9%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
2812 Points
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U
2699 Points -4%
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
6297 Points
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U
5733 Points -9%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
3484 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
6425 Points
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
212 Points
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
Intel Core i7-6500U
207.1 Points -2%
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U
196.9 Points -7%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3173 puntos
ayuda
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
Radeon R7 M460, 6200U, Liteonit CV3-DE256
3651 Points +15%
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
3607 Points +14%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
Radeon R5 M430, i5-7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
3550 Points +12%
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0
3173 Points
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0
3026 Points -5%
WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0
Tasa de Transferencia Mínima: 50.9 MB/s
Tasa de Transferencia Máxima: 101.5 MB/s
Tasa de Transferencia Promedio: 81.6 MB/s
Tiempo de Acceso: 18.4 ms
Velocidad de Ráfagas: 208.9 MB/s
Uso de CPU: 8.7 %
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
Liteonit CV3-DE256
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
6%
11043%
8268%
8778%
Read Seq
102.4
106.9
4%
518
406%
458.6
348%
487
376%
Write Seq
102
106
4%
476.5
367%
270
165%
450.7
342%
Read 512
31.37
33.01
5%
408
1201%
397.4
1167%
384.5
1126%
Write 512
48.12
51.2
6%
274.5
470%
242
403%
356.3
640%
Read 4k
0.357
0.373
4%
35.66
9889%
19.88
5469%
27.05
7477%
Write 4k
1.047
1.097
5%
106.7
10091%
86.7
8181%
63.7
5984%
Read 4k QD32
0.844
1.029
22%
368.7
43585%
275.3
32518%
281.5
33253%
Write 4k QD32
1.098
1.055
-4%
246.3
22332%
197.6
17896%
232
21029%
3DMark 11 Performance
1445 puntos
ayuda
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
AMD Radeon R7 M460, Intel Core i5-6200U
2137 Points +58%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
AMD Radeon R5 M430, Intel Core i5-7200U
1643 Points +21%
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
1506 Points +11%
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1355 Points
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1280 Points -6%
bajo medio alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 39 22.6 18.2 5.8
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.63330.931.630.62531.232.130.330.731.23134.833.531.131.834.84029.430.829.330.729.45028.429.93129.628.46328.229.329.427.528.28027.427.42626.527.410025.527.42625.925.512524.525.824.524.824.516024.524.524.223.724.520023.923.823.122.823.925022.523.122.922.322.531522.522.321.821.122.540022.821.920.920.422.850022.821.820.119.722.86302221.119.6192280025.323.419.518.825.3100025.924.719.718.425.912502826.319.417.528160031.128.920.317.631.1200030.927.819.217.530.925002927.318.717.729315026.623.619.117.926.6400025.423.521.11825.4500021.220.218.818.321.2630019.118.918.418.219.1800018.918.718.418.318.91000018.418.518.318.318.41250018.218.218.218.218.21600018.618.318.218.218.6SPL38.836.831.730.538.8N2.72.41.61.42.7median 23.9median 23.4median 19.6median 18.3median 23.9Delta2.62.81.61.32.640.637.939.137.937.440.538.338.539.138.241.837.737.73933.432.237343033.436.334.435.333.733.937.737.732.931.331.535.133.930.932.131.53333.33232.531.331.332.73333.138.73332.4343131.932.63231.532.832.833.530.428.933.632.329.229.831.529.33030.632303029.93032.937.534.131.631.132.730.932.33232.830.930.929.727.928.533.528.529.428.930.326.928.728.929.528.928.927.626.227.129.126.227.825.528.426.727.626.22726.126.126.925.625.529.625.826.126.727.126.826.625.726.2252525.924.32526.225.72524.925.924.924.324.425.925.625.623.823.623.227.525.124.724.324.924.8252423.923.323.323.322.822.929.424.725.424.925.225.224.22422.9232322.82221.733.626.125.726.426.124.223.3232222.322.321.520.421.537.729.527.529.126.725.72323.421.921.721.721.22020.840.228.928.127.826.625.623.323.721.421.521.519.719.419.333.725.525.72524.623.222.22120.820.420.419.518.418.733.424.323.723.623.52221.421.119.818.918.918.71818.33325.124.62423.522.121.120.719.518.618.618.417.91837.226.62625.424.823.521.420.519.318.618.617.717.617.637.126.925.92624.822.820.620.218.5181817.517.317.438.827.627.426.725.822.720.420.118.418.218.217.417.517.237.124.624.523.522.620.919.51917.917.117.117.317.217.237.825.92524.323.421.41918.317.417.217.217.217.317.234.920.720.419.519.217.917.617.417.317.217.217.217.317.235.719.319.118.618.217.717.417.317.317.117.117.417.317.332.617.917.817.617.617.417.217.217.217.217.217.417.517.426.217.517.517.517.417.417.517.317.417.617.617.417.417.422.217.317.417.517.317.417.417.317.417.317.317.517.317.320.417.317.317.317.317.317.317.317.317.217.217.317.317.318.117.417.417.317.317.317.317.317.217.317.317.430.230.347.936.936.43635.233.632.231.830.930.630.630.21.41.46.22.62.52.42.321.71.71.51.51.51.4median 17.9median 18median 33.4median 25.1median 25median 24.3median 24.6median 22.7median 21.1median 20.5median 19.3median 18.6median 18.6median 17.71.71.84.83.63.13.53.63.63.32.72.62.82.81.7hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ngApple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)

Ruido

Ocioso
31.7 / 31.7 / 31.7 dB(A)
Carga
38.8 / 36.8 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia)
Carga Máx.
 26 °C29 °C28.6 °C 
 23.9 °C28.1 °C27.7 °C 
 23.5 °C24.5 °C28 °C 
Máximo: 29 °C
Médio: 26.6 °C
29.9 °C32 °C29.1 °C
29.4 °C29.6 °C27 °C
28.3 °C25.6 °C24.5 °C
Máximo: 32 °C
Médio: 28.4 °C
Conector de corriente  37.9 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.3 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28 °C / 82.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+0.1 °C / 0.2 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.831.631.82533.930.733.93133.931.833.94031.930.731.95030.129.630.16327.627.527.68027.126.527.110027.225.927.212527.924.827.916030.623.730.620036.422.836.425051.422.351.431556.921.156.940056.820.456.850052.619.752.663055.61955.680065.718.865.710006518.465125062.417.562.416006117.661200061.317.561.325005917.759315060.817.960.8400063.31863.3500058.318.358.3630057.618.257.6800062.118.362.11000061.818.361.81250059.218.259.21600058.218.258.2SPL73.530.573.5N32.51.432.5median 58.3median 18.3median 58.3Delta7.31.37.335.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ngApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (65 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.43 / 0.58 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 5.9 / 9.2 / 9.3 Watt
Carga midlight 35.6 / 32.9 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38)
5h 48min
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 48 Wh
401 min +15%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
i5-7200U, Radeon R5 M430, 35 Wh
373 min +7%
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh
348 min
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
6200U, Radeon R7 M460, 35 Wh
335 min -4%
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
6500U, HD Graphics 520, 42 Wh
299 min -14%

Pro

+ pantalla IPS
+ full-HD
+ amplio almacenamiento masivo
+ soporta Active Stylus

Contra

- pantalla tenue
- ventilador ruidoso con carga
- aguante mediocre de batería
- sin USB Type-C
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Cyberport.de
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Cyberport.de

HP hace este convertible Pavilion en un formato de 15.6" que tiene suficiente potencia de cálculo para todos los escenarios comunes de aplicación. El portátil funciona en mucho silencio en inactivo y apenas se calienta en toda su carga operacional. No le falta capacidad: un HDD 1TB y 8 GB de RAM. Para mejorar a un SSD tienes que abrir la carcasa entera. HP no creyó que mereciera la pena ofrecer una escotilla de acceso. El teclado es suficiente para el uso doméstico. El aguante de batería, demostrada en nuestro test WLAN, sólo puede definirse como media. Para un portátil puramente móvil éste no es la mejor elección.

La pantalla no es particularmente impresionante resultado de su apariencia relativamente tenue.

Por casi 600 Euros, HP debería ofrecer mucho más. Tiene una pantalla IPS amplio ángulo de visión con un contraste decente. Aparte del teclado y el touchpad para la entrada, también trae pantalla táctil. El toque responde bien a la entrada del usuario, sea ya por dedo o por stylus.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng - 12/22/2016 v6(old)
Sascha Mölck

Acabado
74 / 98 → 75%
Teclado
72%
Ratón
86%
Conectividad
48 / 80 → 60%
Peso
61 / 35-78 → 61%
Battería
87%
Pantalla
75%
Rendimiento de juegos
54 / 68 → 79%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
74 / 87 → 85%
Temperatura
96%
Ruido
89%
Audio
63 / 91 → 69%
Cámara
42 / 85 → 49%
Médio
71%
77%
Convertible - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Convertible HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
Sascha Mölck, 2017-01- 9 (Update: 2017-01- 9)