Deutsch
English
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve análisis del convertible Panasonic Toughbook CF-33 (i5-7200U, QHD)
Connections
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Panasonic Toughbook CF-33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Panasonic Toughbook CF-33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Bullman Dirtbook S12 Touch | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 89 %
Brillo con batería: 571 cd/m²
Contraste: 5191:1 (Negro: 0.11 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 22.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 13.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
67.02% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
45.71% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
44.24% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 5.51
| Panasonic Toughbook CF-33 IPS, 2160x1440, 12.00 | Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme IPS, 1366x768, 14.00 | Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414 IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Bullman Dirtbook S12 Touch IPS, 1280x800, 12.10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -16% | -16% | -20% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 44.24 | 37.22 -16% | 37.23 -16% | 35.53 -20% |
| sRGB Coverage | 66.7 | 55.8 -16% | 55.2 -17% | 53.2 -20% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 45.71 | 38.49 -16% | 38.48 -16% | 36.71 -20% |
| Response Times | -36% | -53% | ||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 30 ? | 43 ? -43% | 49 ? -63% | |
| Response Time Black / White * | 29 ? | 27 ? 7% | 36 ? -24% | |
| PWM Frequency | 685 | 200 ? -71% | 198 ? -71% | |
| Screen | -42% | -67% | -37% | |
| Brightness middle | 571 | 493 -14% | 1152 102% | 310 -46% |
| Brightness | 555 | 456 -18% | 1067 92% | 285 -49% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 81 -9% | 86 -3% | 85 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.11 | 0.53 -382% | 1.08 -882% | 0.38 -245% |
| Contrast | 5191 | 930 -82% | 1067 -79% | 816 -84% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 22.7 | 11.08 51% | 10.04 56% | 5.81 74% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 34.14 | 15.11 56% | 19.43 43% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 13.6 | 11.99 12% | 10.47 23% | 4.68 66% |
| Gamma | 5.51 40% | 4.03 55% | 2.42 91% | 2.44 90% |
| CCT | 6998 93% | 10872 60% | 5576 117% | 5764 113% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 42.5 | 36 -15% | 35 -18% | 33.7 -21% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 67.02 | 56 -16% | 63 -6% | 53 -21% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -31% /
-36% | -45% /
-55% | -29% /
-33% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 685 Hz |   | |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 685 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) . La frecuencia de 685 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 17924 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 3846000) Hz. | |||
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 11 ms subida |   |
| ↘ 18 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 73 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21.5 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 30 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 11 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 19 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 34 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (33.7 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Panasonic Toughbook CF-33 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme | |
| Bullman Dirtbook S12 Touch | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Panasonic Toughbook CF-33 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme | |
| Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414 | |
| Bullman Dirtbook S12 Touch | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Panasonic Toughbook CF-33 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme | |
| Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414 | |
| Bullman Dirtbook S12 Touch | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Panasonic Toughbook CF-33 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme | |
| Bullman Dirtbook S12 Touch | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Panasonic Toughbook CF-33 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme | |
| Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414 | |
| Bullman Dirtbook S12 Touch | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Panasonic Toughbook CF-33 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme | |
| Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414 | |
| Bullman Dirtbook S12 Touch | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Panasonic Toughbook CF-33 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme | |
| Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Panasonic Toughbook CF-33 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Panasonic Toughbook CF-33 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Panasonic Toughbook CF-33 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Panasonic Toughbook CF-33 (Edge 41) | |
| Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414 (Edge 38) | |
| Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme (Edge 40) | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3518 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4671 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4495 puntos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3329 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme | |
| Panasonic Toughbook CF-33 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414 | |
| Bullman Dirtbook S12 Touch | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414 | |
| Panasonic Toughbook CF-33 | |
| Bullman Dirtbook S12 Touch | |
| Panasonic Toughbook CF-33 Toshiba SG5 256GB THNSNK256GVN8 | Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme Liteonit CV3-8D128 | Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414 Liteonit CV3-8D128 | Bullman Dirtbook S12 Touch Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -19% | -12% | -9% | |
| Read Seq | 470 | 474.3 1% | 487.7 4% | 278.3 -41% |
| Write Seq | 264.2 | 207.4 -21% | 316.7 20% | 267 1% |
| Read 512 | 403.2 | 265.2 -34% | 351 -13% | 267.3 -34% |
| Write 512 | 265.5 | 167.2 -37% | 185.8 -30% | 264.2 0% |
| Read 4k | 25.11 | 26.98 7% | 27.72 10% | 39.21 56% |
| Write 4k | 93.2 | 60.1 -36% | 62.5 -33% | 79.4 -15% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 384.7 | 304.5 -21% | 267.8 -30% | 214.7 -44% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 200.9 | 176.1 -12% | 158.2 -21% | 205.5 2% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1733 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6511 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 930 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414 | |
| Panasonic Toughbook CF-33 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme | |
| Bullman Dirtbook S12 Touch | |
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 45.2 | 29.6 | 25.4 | 8.9 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 30.3 / 30.3 / 30.5 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 30.5 / 36.6 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30.3 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.3 °C / 84.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-1.2 °C / -2.1 F).
Panasonic Toughbook CF-33 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (69.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 88% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.59 / 0.65 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.6 / 4.6 / 5.15 Watt |
| Carga |
27 / 29.2 Watt |
   
| |
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme | |
| Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414 | |
| Panasonic Toughbook CF-33 | |
| Bullman Dirtbook S12 Touch | |
Pro
Contra
Con el Toughbook CF-33, Panasonic ofrece un desmontable de 12" para situaciones extremas. La robusta carcasa protege el equipo del polvo, la humedad y las caídas. No obstante, el dispositivo muestra un peso relativamente bajo en la balanza.
El procesador Core i5 incorporado ofrece suficiente potencia de computación para todas las aplicaciones habituales. Sobre todo, el dispositivo funciona silenciosamente y apenas se calienta. El SSD asegura un sistema rápido.
El Panasonic Toughbook CF-33 está bien equipado para su uso previsto.
El teclado nos dejó una buena impresión. Sin embargo, nos falta retroiluminación, que está disponible de manera opcional. El dispositivo ofrece un buen aguante de batería, que incluso se puede aumentar aún más con baterías de gran capacidad, tambien opcionales. La pantalla táctil brillante y de alto contraste tiene ángulos de visión estables y también nos dejó una buena impresión en todo momento. Se puede usar con los dedos y con el lápiz incluido.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Panasonic Toughbook CF-33
-
12/15/2017 v6(old)
Sascha Mölck