Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del portátil Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T

Sebastian Bade (traducido por Fernando Alvarez Ude), 12/10/PM

¡Sólido dispositivo todo terreno! Con el Zenbook, Asus presenta un compacto dispositivo de 13.3 pulgadas. Su procesador Skylake y la GPU dedicada conforman un sistema muy rápido. Nuestro análisis mostrará si el dispositivo tiene algún punto flaco.

Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T (ZenBook UX310 Serie)
Procesador
Adaptador gráfico
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX - 2048 MB, Núcleo: 1122 - 1242 MHz, Memoría: 900 MHz, DDR3 (Micron), ForceWare 375.86, Nvidia Optimus, HD Graphics 520
Memoría
16384 MB 
, DDR4, 2133 MHz, dual-channel
pantalla
13.3 pulgadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixels 166 PPI, AU Optronics AUO142D, TN LED, lustroso: no
Placa base
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Disco duro
SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, 256 GB 
, SSD + HGST Travelstar HTS541010A7E630, 1000 GB HDD @ 5400 rpm
Tarjeta de sonido
Conexant SmartAudio HD
Conexiones
2 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, Audio Conexiones: 3.5 mm audio combo, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Brightness Sensor
Equipamento de red
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 18.35 x 323 x 223
Battería
48 Wh, 4240 mAh Litio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD 720p
Características adicionales
Altavoces: stereo, parte inferior, Teclado: Chiclet, Luz de Teclado: si, Maletín Asus, adaptador de corriente, 24 Meses Garantía
Peso
1.466 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 170 g
Precio
1199 EUR

 

 
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
77.8 MB/s ∼100% +129%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
73.7 MB/s ∼95% +117%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
73.1 MB/s ∼94% +115%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
34 MB/s ∼44%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
30.3 MB/s ∼39% -11%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87.1 MB/s ∼100% +119%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
83.28 MB/s ∼96% +110%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80.77 MB/s ∼93% +103%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
39.7 MB/s ∼46%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
37.3 MB/s ∼43% -6%
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (RTL GBE)
676 MBit/s ∼100%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (I219-V)
609 MBit/s ∼90% -10%
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
505 MBit/s ∼75% -25%
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng
Intel Wireless-AC 7265
439 MBit/s ∼65% -35%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (RTL GBE)
556 MBit/s ∼100%
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
526 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (I219-V)
421 MBit/s ∼76% -24%
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng
Intel Wireless-AC 7265
323 MBit/s ∼58% -42%
255
cd/m²
232
cd/m²
237
cd/m²
248
cd/m²
247
cd/m²
246
cd/m²
232
cd/m²
235
cd/m²
230
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
i1 Pro
Máximo: 255 cd/m² Médio: 240.2 cd/m² Minimum: 14.1 cd/m²
iluminación: 90 %
Brillo con batería: 247 cd/m²
Contraste: 574:1 (Negro: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.74 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 4.87 | - Ø
88% sRGB (Argyll) 57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.57
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
TN LED, 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
a-Si WLED TFT, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air (13,3")
IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
IPS-Panel, 2560x1440, 14
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
LED IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Response Times
-6%
-13%
113%
1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
39
35
10%
49
-26%
38.4
2%
36.4
7%
Response Time Black / White *
24
31
-29%
27
-13%
24.8
-3%
25.2
-5%
PWM Frequency
50
50
0%
50
0%
220
340%
Screen
6%
33%
17%
4%
Brightness
240
298
24%
334
39%
280
17%
209
-13%
Brightness Distribution
90
88
-2%
80
-11%
93
3%
88
-2%
Black Level *
0.43
0.35
19%
0.27
37%
0.31
28%
0.28
35%
Contrast
574
929
62%
1285
124%
935
63%
786
37%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.74
6.2
-31%
3.29
31%
3.88
18%
4.58
3%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.87
6.32
-30%
3.62
26%
5.47
-12%
2.34
52%
Gamma
2.57 93%
2.3 104%
2.23 108%
2.33 103%
2.26 106%
CCT
7450 87%
6926 94%
7307 89%
6469 100%
6661 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57
58
2%
62
9%
63.3
11%
34.6
-39%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
88
90
2%
95
8%
96.64
10%
54.2
-38%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
0% / 2%
10% / 20%
65% / 43%
3% / 4%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Grayscales
Grayscales
Color fidelity
Color fidelity
Color Saturation
Color Saturation

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
24 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 7 ms subida
↘ 17 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 26 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (27.2 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
39 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 20 ms subida
↘ 19 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 37 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (44.2 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado 50 Hz30 % de brillo

La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 50 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 30 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM.

La frecuencia de 50 Hz es bajísima, por lo que el parpadeo puede causar fatiga visual y cefaleas cuando se usa mucho tiempo.

Comparación: 60 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 1345 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 30860) Hz.

The viewing angles of the Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T.
The viewing angles of the Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T.
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
DPC latencies
Intel Extreme Tuning Utility
 
Cinebench R10
Cinebench R10
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15
Jetstream 1.1
Jetstream 1.1
Octane V2
Octane V2
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600
147 Points ∼100% +13%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500
130 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air (13,3")
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
118 Points ∼80% -9%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
115 Points ∼78% -12%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
114 Points ∼78% -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600
662 Points ∼100% +102%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500
327 Points ∼49%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air (13,3")
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
294 Points ∼44% -10%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
292 Points ∼44% -11%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
270 Points ∼41% -17%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600
1.67 Points ∼100% +13%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500
1.48 Points ∼89%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
1.29 Points ∼77% -13%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air (13,3")
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
1.21 Points ∼72% -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600
7.42 Points ∼100% +136%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air (13,3")
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
3.23 Points ∼44% +3%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
3.21 Points ∼43% +2%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500
3.15 Points ∼42%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500
6407 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
5620 Points ∼88% -12%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500
14075 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
12670 Points ∼90% -10%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 (Edge 20)
243.68 Points ∼100% +17%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500 (EDGE: 38.14393.0.0)
208.98 Points ∼86%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
194.52 Points ∼80% -7%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air (13,3")
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
178.14 Points ∼73% -15%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 (EDGE: 25.10586.0.0)
165.18 Points ∼68% -21%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 (Edge 20)
37996 Points ∼100% +28%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500 (EDGE: 38.14393.0.0)
29762 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air (13,3")
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
25958 Points ∼68% -13%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 (EDGE: 25.10586.0.0)
25149 Points ∼66% -15%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air (13,3")
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
1391.2 ms * ∼100% -16%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 (EDGE: 25.10586.0.0)
1381.8 ms * ∼99% -16%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500 (EDGE: 38.14393.0.0)
1196.3 ms * ∼86%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 (Edge 20)
994.3 ms * ∼71% +17%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6502
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
10897
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4904
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
6549 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
14075 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
6407 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.15 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
45.61 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.48 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
327 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
130 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
62.78 fps
ayuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
4603 Points ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN512HCHP
4463 Points ∼97% -3%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
4312 Points ∼94% -6%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air (13,3")
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
4274 Points ∼93% -7%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
4440 Points ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN512HCHP
4241 Points ∼96% -4%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
3961 Points ∼89% -11%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
3769 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
3337 Points ∼89% -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN512HCHP
3292 Points ∼87% -13%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280
3238 Points ∼86% -14%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air (13,3")
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
3144 Points ∼83% -17%
PCMark 7
Productivity
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN512HCHP
4840 Points ∼100% +23%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
3933 Points ∼81%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
2481 Points ∼51% -37%
Score
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN512HCHP
5585 Points ∼100% +5%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
5305 Points ∼95%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
4866 Points ∼87% -8%
PCMark Vantage Result
13885 puntos
PCMark 7 Score
5305 puntos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3769 puntos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4440 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4603 puntos
ayuda
Sandisk delivers the SSD in the M.2 2280 format.
Sandisk delivers the SSD in the M.2 2280 format.
M.2 SSD when incorporated
M.2 SSD when incorporated
The 2.5-inch hard drive in its place.
The 2.5-inch hard drive in its place.
The hard drive rotates at 5400 rpm.
The hard drive rotates at 5400 rpm.
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air (13,3")
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN512HCHP
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
42%
109%
48%
-6%
Write 4k QD32
200.2
294.3
47%
312.2
56%
319.8
60%
204.6
2%
Read 4k QD32
147.4
395.8
169%
487.6
231%
358.1
143%
149.5
1%
Write 4k
72.07
85.76
19%
153.4
113%
86.5
20%
73.94
3%
Read 4k
22.03
33.3
51%
43.4
97%
29.18
32%
14
-36%
Write 512
272.8
302.6
11%
414.3
52%
Read 512
318.6
419.9
32%
411.4
29%
Write Seq
319.2
302.7
-5%
314
-2%
442
38%
309.1
-3%
Read Seq
468.1
508.4
9%
1209
158%
502.4
7%
469.3
0%
SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
Tasa de Transferencia Mínima: 52 MB/s
Tasa de Transferencia Máxima: 107.1 MB/s
Tasa de Transferencia Promedio: 84.8 MB/s
Tiempo de Acceso: 21.7 ms
Velocidad de Ráfagas: 241.4 MB/s
Uso de CPU: 15.8 %
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air (13,3")
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
2091 Points ∼5% +32%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1718 Points ∼4% +8%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
1589 Points ∼4%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
1553 Points ∼4% -2%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air (13,3")
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
12078 Points ∼7% +42%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
9230 Points ∼6% +8%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
8552 Points ∼5% 0%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
8519 Points ∼5%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
46764 Points ∼6%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
45561 Points ∼6% -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
43587 Points ∼6% -7%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
2636 Points ∼5% +14%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
2508 Points ∼5% +8%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air (13,3")
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
2417 Points ∼5% +4%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
2321 Points ∼5%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
2221 Points ∼4% -4%
1280x720 Performance
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
2805 Points ∼10% +16%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air (13,3")
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
2578 Points ∼9% +6%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
2553 Points ∼9% +5%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
2424 Points ∼8%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
2330 Points ∼8% -4%
3DMark 06 - 1280x1024 Standard AA:0x AF:0x
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
14195 Points ∼34% +37%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
11658 Points ∼28% +13%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
10351 Points ∼25%
3DMark 2001SE Standard
28793 puntos
3DMark 03 Standard
28408 puntos
3DMark 05 Standard
20654 puntos
3DMark 06 Standard
10351 puntos
3DMark 11 Performance
2424 puntos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
44072 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
6264 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1394 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
716 puntos
3DMark Time Spy Score
514 puntos
ayuda
bajo medio alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 85.948.739.413.3fps
Battlefield 4 (2013) 67.243.829.110.7fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 2416.38.75.3fps
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.3363334.637.32536.73533.239.636.73147.942.636.639.947.94037.935.232.435.237.95031.933.631.632.331.96332.531.429.128.232.58027.234.926.72627.210025.928.125.82625.912526.127.525.425.426.116024.325.224.623.324.320027.625.922.923.827.625023.732.621.922.723.731524.727.321.121.624.740023.12619.920.223.150023.226.72019.623.263022.326.918.918.622.380024.527.618.418.624.5100025.228.418.21825.2125025.328.717.717.425.3160025.228.817.917.925.2200025.830.317.817.525.8250026.430.717.817.826.4315024.828.61817.924.8400023.728.7181823.7500021.425.318.418.321.4630021.324.818.418.421.3800020.322.918.518.420.3100001920.618.418.4191250018.719.518.318.218.71600018.91918.318.418.9SPL36.240.130.630.536.2N2.53.51.41.42.5median 24.3Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011Tmedian 27.3median 18.4median 18.4median 24.3Delta1.71.71.821.7hearing rangehide median Fan Noise
The small fan is not disturbing.
The small fan...
The small fan is not disturbing.
...is not disturbing.

Ruido

Ocioso
30.5 / 30.5 / 31.5 dB(A)
HDD
30.9 dB(A)
Carga
36.2 / 40 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, GeForce 940MX
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, GeForce 940MX
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air (13,3")
Intel Core i5-6200U, GeForce 940MX
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, GeForce 940MX
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, GeForce 940MX
Noise
-7%
-3%
5%
-1%
Idle Minimum *
30.5
32.5
-7%
31.15
-2%
29.2
4%
29.2
4%
Idle Average *
30.5
34.6
-13%
31.15
-2%
29.2
4%
29.2
4%
Idle Maximum *
31.5
34.6
-10%
31.15
1%
29.2
7%
30.8
2%
Load Average *
36.2
38.7
-7%
38.2
-6%
33.5
7%
38
-5%
Load Maximum *
40
39.9
-0%
41.7
-4%
38.8
3%
44.3
-11%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Stress test: Prime95 + Furmark
Stress test: Prime95 + Furmark
Stress test: only Furmark
Stress test: only Furmark
Stress test: only Prime95
Stress test: only Prime95
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
GeForce 940MX, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air (13,3")
GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
GeForce 940MX, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN512HCHP
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
GeForce 940MX, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280
Heat
-13%
-12%
-32%
-21%
Maximum Upper Side *
38.5
43.4
-13%
51
-32%
51.6
-34%
44.1
-15%
Maximum Bottom *
40.4
43.2
-7%
47
-16%
55.2
-37%
44.9
-11%
Idle Upper Side *
24.8
28
-13%
24.4
2%
30.7
-24%
32.4
-31%
Idle Bottom *
23.8
28.2
-18%
24.6
-3%
31.5
-32%
30.2
-27%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.
 31.8 °C38.5 °C33.3 °C 
 34.6 °C38.4 °C28.4 °C 
 27.7 °C25.2 °C27 °C 
Máximo: 38.5 °C
Médio: 31.7 °C
34.6 °C40.4 °C34.5 °C
31.3 °C36 °C33.5 °C
28.4 °C29.1 °C29.8 °C
Máximo: 40.4 °C
Médio: 33.1 °C
Conector de corriente  53 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21.5 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
The speaker grills are on the front side.
The speaker grills are on the front side.
The two speakers stem from Harman/Kardon.
The two speakers...
The two speakers stem from Harman/Kardon.
...stem from Harman/Kardon.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.134.635.12534.739.634.73138.339.938.34033.135.233.15030.132.330.16327.928.227.98028262810034.12634.112539.225.439.216041.223.341.220044.923.844.925052.622.752.631557.921.657.940060.120.260.15006119.66163062.918.662.980063.218.663.2100062.31862.3125065.317.465.3160065.817.965.8200067.617.567.6250069.917.869.9315071.517.971.5400072.91872.9500072.118.372.1630072.318.472.3800071.518.471.5100007118.4711250070.918.270.91600068.218.468.2SPL81.730.581.7N49.91.449.9median 65.3Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011Tmedian 18.4median 65.3Delta8.928.935.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.28 / 0.62 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3 / 5.6 / 6.8 Watt
Carga midlight 48.7 / 63 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
6500U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, TN LED, 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
6200U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP, a-Si WLED TFT, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air (13,3")
6200U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
6700HQ, GeForce 940MX, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN512HCHP, IPS-Panel, 2560x1440, 14
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
6200U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280, LED IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Power Consumption
-31%
-6%
-51%
-8%
Idle Minimum *
3
4.9
-63%
4
-33%
5
-67%
4
-33%
Idle Average *
5.6
9.4
-68%
6.6
-18%
9.9
-77%
6.4
-14%
Idle Maximum *
6.8
10.7
-57%
7.4
-9%
10.8
-59%
7
-3%
Load Average *
48.7
46
6%
41.7
14%
52.4
-8%
45.5
7%
Load Maximum *
63
47.2
25%
52.4
17%
89.8
-43%
62.2
1%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

The 48 Wh lithium ion battery...
The 48 Wh lithium ion battery...
... is screwed inside.
... is screwed inside.
maximum battery life
maximum battery life
minimum battery life
minimum battery life
Wi-Fi battery life
Wi-Fi battery life
H.264 battery life
H.264 battery life
Charging time
Charging time
Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
14h 38min
Navegando con WLAN v1.3 (EDGE: 38.14393.0.0)
8h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
6h 59min
Carga (máximo brillo)
1h 43min
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
6500U, GeForce 940MX, 48 Wh
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
6200U, GeForce 940MX, 53 Wh
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air (13,3")
6200U, GeForce 940MX, 40 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
6700HQ, GeForce 940MX, 48 Wh
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
6200U, GeForce 940MX, 41 Wh
Duración de Batería
11%
-14%
-30%
-32%
Reader / Idle
878
958
9%
718
-18%
660
-25%
Load
103
147
43%
83
-19%
61
-41%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
486
433
-11%
389
-20%
298
-39%
329
-32%
H.264
419
424
1%
423
1%
357
-15%

Pro

+ Buena duración de batería
+ Muchas interfaces
+ Teclado retroiluminado
+ Amplio touchpad
+ Se incluye funda para portátil
+ GPU dedicada
+ Rendimiento muy elevado
+ Chasis muy estable
+ Diseño simple y elegante

Contra

- Pantalla de baja calidad
- PWM a 50 Hz
- Ángulos de visualización escasos
- Teclado con sensación esponjosa
- La pantalla tintinea
Análisis: Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T. Modelo de prueba cedido por Asus Alemania.
Análisis: Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T. Modelo de prueba cedido por Asus Alemania.

La gama Zenbook de Asus es conocida por sus dispositivos ligeros y transportables y podemos decir que el Asus Zenbook UX310UQ es ambas cosas. Con el Zenbook UX310UQ, ASUS ofrece un subportátil muy duradero, que convence gracias a sus materiales de gama alta y a una buena calidad de construcción. El modelo de prueba proporciona un buen rendimiento y una muy buena duración de batería por 1200 euros.

A primera vista el Asus Zenbook UX310UQ aparenta ser de gama muy alta. Su bajo peso y larga duración de batería hacen de este dispositivo un buen acompañante para las tareas cotidianas. Los clientes obtendrán un dispositivo muy elegante por 1200 euros.

El panel TN incluido resulta bastante decepcionante. Un dispositivo de este precio debería incluir una batería de mucha mayor calidad. Los dispositivos de entrada tampoco son del todo convincentes. Por lo tanto la gente que haga uso intensivo del teclado no debería escoger el Zenbook UX310UQ. La funda incluida resulta util para transportar el portátil siempre supone una ventaja. Además, Asus ha hecho un buen trabajo en términos de conectividad. Para un dispositivo de 13 pulgadas, se han incluido interfaces suficientes para la conexión de muchos periféricos.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T - 12/06/PM v6
Sebastian Bade

Acabado
81 /  98 → 83%
Teclado
81%
Ratón
75%
Conectividad
53 / 80 → 67%
Peso
69 / 78 → 79%
Battería
89%
Pantalla
82%
Rendimiento de juegos
62 / 68 → 91%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
86 / 87 → 98%
Temperatura
94 / 91 → 100%
Ruido
90%
Audio
59 / 91 → 65%
Cámara
64 / 85 → 75%
Médio
76%
84%
Subnotebook - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del portátil Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Sebastian Bade, 2016-12-10 (Update: 2016-12-11)