Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del Smartphone Leagoo M5

Marcus Herbrich (traducido por Francisco García), 10/09/2016

¡Caliente! El Leagoo M5 es un smartphone básico asequible con una característica genial - según el fabricante, debería resistir las caídas y la rotura de pantalla. El fabricante instala un marco de metal sólido y un vidrio frontal endurecido especial para lograrlo. Sin embargo, esta resistencia parece cobrarse su precio en la disipación de calor, ya que el M5 muestra su lado caliente en el test.

bien (78%) Leagoo M5 Mediatek MT6580MARM Mali-400 MP2 Smartphone - 10/06/2016 - v5.1
Dispositivo de pruebas cortesía de Leagoo
(download rating image as PNG or SVG)
Leagoo M5 (M Serie)
Procesador
Mediatek MT6580M 1.3 GHz
Adaptador gráfico
ARM Mali-400 MP2
Memoría
2048 MB 
, DDR3
pantalla
5 pulgadas 16:9, 1280x720 pixels 294 PPI, capacitiva, LCD, IPS, a prueba de roturas, lustroso: si
Disco duro
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.6 GB libre
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, Audio Conexiones: clavija headset 3.5mm, Card Reader: micro-SD (T-FLASH), max. 128 GB, 1 Lector de Huellas Digitales, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: movimiento, proximidad
Equipamento de red
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0, 3G WCDMA 850/1900/2100 || 2G GSM 850/900/1800/1900, Dual SIM, GPS
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 8.7 x 141.7 x 71.3
Battería
2300 mAh Litio-Ion, removeable
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix flash, f/2.0
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Características adicionales
Altavoces: mono, Teclado: virtual, Luz de Teclado: si, adaptador modular de corriente, cable USB, FreeMe OS 6.0, 12 Meses Garantía, fanless
Peso
178 g, Suministro de Electricidad: 35 g
Precio
60 Euros

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Xiaomi Mi 5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
316 MBit/s ∼100% +565%
Ulefone Metal
Mali-T720, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
88.3 MBit/s ∼28% +86%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
Mali-T720, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 MBit/s ∼15% +3%
Oukitel U7 Plus
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
48.3 MBit/s ∼15% +2%
Leagoo M5
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
47.5 MBit/s ∼15%
Archos 50e Neon
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 8 GB eMMC Flash
42 MBit/s ∼13% -12%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Xiaomi Mi 5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
265 MBit/s ∼100% +420%
Ulefone Metal
Mali-T720, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
73.1 MBit/s ∼28% +43%
Oukitel U7 Plus
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
52.1 MBit/s ∼20% +2%
Leagoo M5
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
51 MBit/s ∼19%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
Mali-T720, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.5 MBit/s ∼18% -5%
Archos 50e Neon
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 8 GB eMMC Flash
46 MBit/s ∼17% -10%
GPS test Leagoo M5
GPS test Leagoo M5
GPS test Leagoo M5
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
GPS test Garmin Edge 500

Comparación de Imágenes

Elige una escena y navega dentro de la primera imagen. Un click cambia el nivel de zoom. Un click en la imagen aumentada abre la original en una ventana nueva. La primera imagen muestra la fotografía escalada del dispositivo de pruebas.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
386
cd/m²
395
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
385
cd/m²
401
cd/m²
402
cd/m²
368
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 402 cd/m² Médio: 386.6 cd/m² Minimum: 22.87 cd/m²
iluminación: 92 %
Brillo con batería: 401 cd/m²
Contraste: 757:1 (Negro: 0.53 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.7 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 13.3 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.3
Leagoo M5
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Oukitel U7 Plus
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Oukitel K4000 Pro
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Ulefone Metal
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Wiko Jerry
IPS, 854x480, 5
Wiko Robby
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Archos 50e Neon
TFT, 854x480, 5
Xiaomi Mi 5
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.15
Screen
11%
16%
4%
13%
22%
5%
4%
40%
Brightness
387
437
13%
367
-5%
315
-19%
436
13%
576
49%
349
-10%
430
11%
566
46%
Brightness Distribution
92
91
-1%
89
-3%
87
-5%
91
-1%
88
-4%
89
-3%
94
2%
90
-2%
Black Level *
0.53
0.58
-9%
0.36
32%
0.56
-6%
0.57
-8%
0.73
-38%
0.65
-23%
0.38
28%
0.51
4%
Contrast
757
797
5%
1000
32%
557
-26%
758
0%
851
12%
529
-30%
1166
54%
1173
55%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
9.7
7.5
23%
9.01
7%
6.8
30%
7
28%
4.7
52%
5.8
40%
13.9
-43%
3.5
64%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
13.3
8.5
36%
8.67
35%
7.1
47%
7.6
43%
5.2
61%
5.7
57%
17.3
-30%
3.5
74%
Gamma
2.3 104%
2.54 94%
2.66 90%
2.77 87%
2.1 114%
2.51 96%
2.1 114%
2.93 82%
2.29 105%
CCT
10359 63%
8914 73%
7641 85%
7402 88%
8368 78%
7505 87%
7792 83%
22878 28%
6532 100%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
28 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 11 ms subida
↘ 17 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 58 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (26.9 ms).
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
33 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 14 ms subida
↘ 19 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 19 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (43.3 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 58 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 5100 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5
18.48 MB/s ∼21%
Oukitel U7 Plus
22.6 MB/s ∼26% +22%
Ulefone Metal
27.6 MB/s ∼32% +49%
Wiko Jerry
19.12 MB/s ∼22% +3%
Wiko Robby
19.68 MB/s ∼23% +6%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
15.58 MB/s ∼18% -16%
Archos 50e Neon
18.87 MB/s ∼22% +2%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5
36.07 MB/s ∼37%
Oukitel U7 Plus
46.63 MB/s ∼48% +29%
Ulefone Metal
49.6 MB/s ∼51% +38%
Wiko Jerry
40.91 MB/s ∼42% +13%
Wiko Robby
41.39 MB/s ∼43% +15%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
31.85 MB/s ∼33% -12%
Archos 50e Neon
35.27 MB/s ∼37% -2%
Random Write 4KB (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5
5.46 MB/s ∼4%
Oukitel U7 Plus
2.18 MB/s ∼1% -60%
Oukitel K4000 Pro
7.5 MB/s ∼5% +37%
Ulefone Metal
7.87 MB/s ∼5% +44%
Wiko Jerry
6.4 MB/s ∼4% +17%
Wiko Robby
6.9 MB/s ∼5% +26%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
4.35 MB/s ∼3% -20%
Archos 50e Neon
5.18 MB/s ∼3% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 5
13.61 MB/s ∼9% +149%
Random Read 4KB (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5
14.98 MB/s ∼9%
Oukitel U7 Plus
11.25 MB/s ∼7% -25%
Oukitel K4000 Pro
13.79 MB/s ∼8% -8%
Ulefone Metal
22.18 MB/s ∼13% +48%
Wiko Jerry
14.97 MB/s ∼9% 0%
Wiko Robby
15.7 MB/s ∼9% +5%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
14.31 MB/s ∼8% -4%
Archos 50e Neon
15.29 MB/s ∼9% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 5
106.78 MB/s ∼62% +613%
Sequential Write 256KB (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5
12.11 MB/s ∼6%
Oukitel U7 Plus
59 MB/s ∼29% +387%
Oukitel K4000 Pro
39.82 MB/s ∼19% +229%
Ulefone Metal
39.91 MB/s ∼19% +230%
Wiko Jerry
12.11 MB/s ∼6% 0%
Wiko Robby
47.6 MB/s ∼23% +293%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
7.56 MB/s ∼4% -38%
Archos 50e Neon
8.33 MB/s ∼4% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 5
159.29 MB/s ∼77% +1215%
Sequential Read 256KB (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5
133.68 MB/s ∼17%
Oukitel U7 Plus
125.91 MB/s ∼16% -6%
Oukitel K4000 Pro
191.29 MB/s ∼24% +43%
Ulefone Metal
228.84 MB/s ∼29% +71%
Wiko Jerry
132.81 MB/s ∼17% -1%
Wiko Robby
126.2 MB/s ∼16% -6%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
125.37 MB/s ∼16% -6%
Archos 50e Neon
130.29 MB/s ∼16% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 5
459.64 MB/s ∼58% +244%
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5
24238 Points ∼11%
Oukitel U7 Plus
28683 Points ∼13% +18%
Oukitel K4000 Pro
24028 Points ∼11% -1%
Ulefone Metal
37103 Points ∼16% +53%
Wiko Jerry
15185 Points ∼7% -37%
Wiko Robby
15797 Points ∼7% -35%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
23657 Points ∼10% -2%
Archos 50e Neon
24509 Points ∼11% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 5
116330 Points ∼51% +380%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus
749 Points ∼25%
Oukitel K4000 Pro
604 Points ∼20%
Ulefone Metal
1057 Points ∼35%
Xiaomi Mi 5
1976 Points ∼66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus
126 Points ∼2%
Oukitel K4000 Pro
100 Points ∼1%
Ulefone Metal
243 Points ∼3%
Xiaomi Mi 5
4558 Points ∼59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordenar por valor)
Oukitel U7 Plus
155 Points ∼3%
Oukitel K4000 Pro
123 Points ∼2%
Ulefone Metal
293 Points ∼6%
Xiaomi Mi 5
3542 Points ∼71%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5
7886 Points ∼11%
Oukitel U7 Plus
8660 Points ∼13% +10%
Oukitel K4000 Pro
7370 Points ∼11% -7%
Ulefone Metal
10371 Points ∼15% +32%
Wiko Jerry
7748 Points ∼11% -2%
Wiko Robby
7868 Points ∼11% 0%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
6902 Points ∼10% -12%
Archos 50e Neon
7848 Points ∼11% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 5
21483 Points ∼31% +172%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5
2478 Points ∼1%
Oukitel U7 Plus
3137 Points ∼1% +27%
Oukitel K4000 Pro
2609 Points ∼1% +5%
Ulefone Metal
6469 Points ∼1% +161%
Wiko Jerry
2481 Points ∼1% 0%
Wiko Robby
2476 Points ∼1% 0%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2681 Points ∼1% +8%
Archos 50e Neon
2485 Points ∼1% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 5
32613 Points ∼7% +1216%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5
2921 Points ∼1%
Oukitel U7 Plus
3656 Points ∼2% +25%
Oukitel K4000 Pro
3046 Points ∼2% +4%
Ulefone Metal
7059 Points ∼4% +142%
Wiko Jerry
2922 Points ∼1% 0%
Wiko Robby
2921 Points ∼1% 0%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
3103 Points ∼2% +6%
Archos 50e Neon
2930 Points ∼1% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 5
29246 Points ∼15% +901%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5
4.4 fps ∼0%
Oukitel U7 Plus
5.9 fps ∼0% +34%
Ulefone Metal
19 fps ∼1% +332%
Wiko Jerry
4.4 fps ∼0% 0%
Wiko Robby
4.4 fps ∼0% 0%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
8.7 fps ∼1% +98%
Archos 50e Neon
11 fps ∼1% +150%
Xiaomi Mi 5
90 fps ∼7% +1945%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5
8 fps ∼2%
Oukitel U7 Plus
9.8 fps ∼2% +23%
Oukitel K4000 Pro
8.5 fps ∼2% +6%
Ulefone Metal
12 fps ∼3% +50%
Wiko Jerry
11 fps ∼2% +38%
Wiko Robby
7.9 fps ∼2% -1%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
4.9 fps ∼1% -39%
Archos 50e Neon
4.4 fps ∼1% -45%
Xiaomi Mi 5
60 fps ∼13% +650%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5
2808 Points ∼34%
Oukitel U7 Plus
3105 Points ∼37% +11%
Oukitel K4000 Pro
2757 Points ∼33% -2%
Ulefone Metal
4079 Points ∼49% +45%
Wiko Jerry
2636 Points ∼32% -6%
Wiko Robby
2785 Points ∼34% -1%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2807 Points ∼34% 0%
Archos 50e Neon
2796 Points ∼34% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 5
6873 Points ∼83% +145%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5
9 Points ∼1%
Oukitel U7 Plus
573 Points ∼37% +6267%
Oukitel K4000 Pro
563 Points ∼37% +6156%
Ulefone Metal
10 Points ∼1% +11%
Wiko Jerry
530 Points ∼34% +5789%
Wiko Robby
640 Points ∼42% +7011%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
9 Points ∼1% 0%
Archos 50e Neon
525 Points ∼34% +5733%
Xiaomi Mi 5
1106 Points ∼72% +12189%
Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5
139 Points ∼2%
Oukitel U7 Plus
211 Points ∼2% +52%
Oukitel K4000 Pro
173 Points ∼2% +24%
Ulefone Metal
433 Points ∼5% +212%
Wiko Jerry
139 Points ∼2% 0%
Wiko Robby
137 Points ∼2% -1%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
175 Points ∼2% +26%
Archos 50e Neon
138 Points ∼2% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 5
4522 Points ∼53% +3153%
Memory (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5
331 Points ∼7%
Oukitel U7 Plus
770 Points ∼17% +133%
Oukitel K4000 Pro
409 Points ∼9% +24%
Ulefone Metal
802 Points ∼18% +142%
Wiko Jerry
290 Points ∼7% -12%
Wiko Robby
404 Points ∼9% +22%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
354 Points ∼8% +7%
Archos 50e Neon
317 Points ∼7% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 5
1801 Points ∼41% +444%
System (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5
990 Points ∼15%
Oukitel U7 Plus
1120 Points ∼17% +13%
Oukitel K4000 Pro
840 Points ∼13% -15%
Ulefone Metal
1691 Points ∼26% +71%
Wiko Jerry
966 Points ∼15% -2%
Wiko Robby
983 Points ∼15% -1%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
838 Points ∼13% -15%
Archos 50e Neon
990 Points ∼15% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 5
3638 Points ∼55% +267%
Overall (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5
144 Points ∼4%
Oukitel U7 Plus
568 Points ∼15% +294%
Oukitel K4000 Pro
428 Points ∼11% +197%
Ulefone Metal
273 Points ∼7% +90%
Wiko Jerry
379 Points ∼10% +163%
Wiko Robby
432 Points ∼11% +200%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
148 Points ∼4% +3%
Archos 50e Neon
389 Points ∼10% +170%
Xiaomi Mi 5
2392 Points ∼63% +1561%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5
1166 Points ∼4%
Oukitel U7 Plus
1508 Points ∼5% +29%
Ulefone Metal
2458 Points ∼9% +111%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
1206 Points ∼4% +3%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5
407 Points ∼7%
Oukitel U7 Plus
580 Points ∼10% +43%
Ulefone Metal
609 Points ∼11% +50%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
428 Points ∼8% +5%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5
14.451 Points ∼4%
Oukitel U7 Plus
17.257 Points ∼5% +19%
Oukitel K4000 Pro
13.445 Points ∼4% -7%
Ulefone Metal
17.831 Points ∼5% +23%
Wiko Jerry
14 Points ∼4% -3%
Wiko Robby
13.549 Points ∼4% -6%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
12.755 Points ∼4% -12%
Archos 50e Neon
14.118 Points ∼4% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 5
53.969 Points ∼16% +273%
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5
2144 Points ∼4%
Oukitel U7 Plus
2554 Points ∼5% +19%
Oukitel K4000 Pro
2200 Points ∼4% +3%
Ulefone Metal
2738 Points ∼6% +28%
Wiko Jerry
2075 Points ∼4% -3%
Wiko Robby
2159 Points ∼4% +1%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2122 Points ∼4% -1%
Archos 50e Neon
2103 Points ∼4% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 5
8619 Points ∼17% +302%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Leagoo M5
14766.5 ms * ∼25%
Oukitel U7 Plus
14931.4 ms * ∼25% -1%
Oukitel K4000 Pro
18250.5 ms * ∼31% -24%
Ulefone Metal
13397.3 ms * ∼23% +9%
Wiko Jerry
14922.6 ms * ∼25% -1%
Wiko Robby
15131 ms * ∼25% -2%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
19092.2 ms * ∼32% -29%
Archos 50e Neon
15157.3 ms * ∼25% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 5
2973.3 ms * ∼5% +80%

Leyenda

 
Leagoo M5 Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Oukitel U7 Plus Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Oukitel K4000 Pro Mediatek MT6735, , 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Ulefone Metal Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Wiko Jerry Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Wiko Robby Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Archos 50 Platinum 4G Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Archos 50e Neon Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.
 45.6 °C45.3 °C41 °C 
 46.1 °C46.4 °C40.6 °C 
 44.6 °C42.1 °C40.9 °C 
Máximo: 46.4 °C
Médio: 43.6 °C
39.5 °C39.7 °C44.1 °C
39 °C40 °C44.8 °C
39 °C39 °C48.1 °C
Máximo: 48.1 °C
Médio: 41.5 °C
Conector de corriente  38.4 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.637.22525.4383125.331.54032.932.15033.638.26331.633.68028.427.51002725.212520.825.61602223.720021.323.625020.829.331521.237.640019.44750019.554.263017.758.980017.964.4100017.868.5125017.369.3160017.470200016.774.7250017.274.5315018.271.8400017.973.7500017.673.5630017.774.9800017.877.91000017.9761250018.170.61600018.265.4SPL3084.9N1.356.6median 17.9Leagoo M5median 68.5Delta1.315.731.641.525.435.725.336.532.936.433.636.831.637.128.428272820.826.9222321.324.320.830.421.236.519.445.419.551.917.75517.959.717.863.517.364.217.466.816.766.717.263.718.268.617.975.117.676.617.767.417.865.817.965.718.157.218.245.53081.61.343.6median 17.9Oukitel U7 Plusmedian 59.71.313.720.622.921.920.620.721.720.320.722.32123.622.322.626.934.422.621.222.321.921.217.820.318.917.817.918.118.617.922.522.823.922.534.733.236.134.716.72617.216.716.433.215.816.419.438.919.119.422.345.519.122.327.552.717.927.533.658.319.133.639.163.216.139.143.466.515.543.442.764.716.442.739.26213.739.236.8601336.834.857.913.934.834.558.911.434.537.861.110.737.839.16310.339.141.464.29.841.442.7689.442.748.271.69.548.240.764.99.440.730.755.79.630.726.850.39.426.852.876.426.652.88.337.30.98.3median 34.8Ulefone Metalmedian 58.9median 13.9median 34.86.79.24.16.732.441.331.337.831.735.42634.939.440.336.232.928.632.525.424.321.323.723.322.422.525.822.426.221.336.518.444.417.55617.560.817.269.516.870.117.372.817.472.316.672.217.368.717.665.417.667.117.76717.467.817.769.217.968.618.162.718.151.329.881.21.346.6median 17.7Archos 50 Platinum 4Gmedian 65.41.614.2hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Leagoo M5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 41.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Oukitel U7 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.59 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Ulefone Metal audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Archos 50 Platinum 4G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.17 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 8.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.09 / 0.14 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.81 / 2.26 / 2.39 Watt
Carga midlight 6.97 / 7.03 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Leagoo M5
2300 mAh
Oukitel U7 Plus
2500 mAh
Oukitel K4000 Pro
4600 mAh
Ulefone Metal
3050 mAh
Wiko Jerry
2000 mAh
Wiko Robby
2500 mAh
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2200 mAh
Archos 50e Neon
2200 mAh
Power Consumption
-2%
-65%
-15%
14%
7%
31%
27%
Idle Minimum *
0.81
0.86
-6%
2.74
-238%
1.41
-74%
0.8
1%
0.92
-14%
0.59
27%
0.56
31%
Idle Average *
2.26
2.68
-19%
3.92
-73%
2.46
-9%
2.02
11%
2.12
6%
1.68
26%
1.58
30%
Idle Maximum *
2.39
2.78
-16%
4.05
-69%
2.83
-18%
2.19
8%
2.34
2%
1.79
25%
1.8
25%
Load Average *
6.97
5.33
24%
4.84
31%
5.15
26%
5.02
28%
5.3
24%
4.22
39%
5.22
25%
Load Maximum *
7.03
6.49
8%
5.42
23%
7.05
-0%
5.52
21%
5.78
18%
4.26
39%
5.34
24%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Navegando con WLAN v1.3
6h 46min
Leagoo M5
2300 mAh
Oukitel U7 Plus
2500 mAh
Oukitel K4000 Pro
4600 mAh
Ulefone Metal
3050 mAh
Wiko Jerry
2000 mAh
Wiko Robby
2500 mAh
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2200 mAh
Archos 50e Neon
2200 mAh
Duración de Batería
WiFi v1.3
406
366
-10%
711
75%
403
-1%
475
17%
712
75%
384
-5%
498
23%

Pro

+ panel HD IPS
+ 2 GB de RAM
+ 16 GB de ROM
+ dual-SIM + ranura SD
+ lector de huellas
+ resistencia

Contra

- SoC lento
- calor residual
- almacenamiento eMMC lento
- brillo de pantalla ligeramente bajo
- tiras en la pantalla
- relativamente pesado
- altavoz
- sin LTE
- teclas no iluminadas
Leogoo M5. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Leagoo.
Leogoo M5. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Leagoo.

Aunque nuestros contras superan los pros del Leagoo M5, el dispositivo básico de 65 Euros no es inevitablemente un mal smartphone. La configuración técnica y su resistencia a influencias externas (aún cuando no pudimos testar este hecho) son un fuerte argumento de compra para este nivel de precios. Sin embargo, otros smartphones ofrecen un paquete total mejor aunque tengan un precio de compra más alto. Ante todo, nombraríamos al UleFone Meta o UHANS S1. Los compradores que no quieren tratar con importadores pueden encontrar la alternativa adecuada en el Coolpad Porto S o ZTE's Blade A452.

Demasiadas cosas que criticar nos impiden darle al Leagoo M5 una recomendación de compra a pesar de las buenas especificaciones técnicas y el bajísimo precio de compra.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Leagoo M5 - 10/06/2016 v5.1
Marcus Herbrich

Acabado
85%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 86%
Ratón
85%
Conectividad
34 / 60 → 56%
Peso
90%
Battería
89%
Pantalla
78%
Rendimiento de juegos
5 / 63 → 7%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
23 / 70 → 33%
Temperatura
80%
Ruido
100%
Audio
52 / 91 → 57%
Cámara
62%
Médio
65%
78%
Smartphone - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Smartphone Leagoo M5
Marcus Herbrich, 2016-10- 9 (Update: 2016-10- 9)