Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del Smartphone Sony Xperia X Compact

Andreas Osthoff, Manuel Masiero (traducido por Francisco García), 10/28/2016

Compacto y con aguante, pero ya no es de gama alta. Sony vuelve a ofrecer una versión Compact de su smartphone insignia este año. Sin embargo, el modelo más pequeño tendrá que aguantarse con componentes más lentos a partir de ahora. Nuestro análisis muestra por qué no es necesariamente un problema.

Sony Xperia X Compact (Xperia Serie)
Procesador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
Adaptador gráfico
Memoría
3072 MB 
pantalla
4.6 pulgadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels 319 PPI, capacitiva, multitáctil, 10 puntos, IPS, TRILUMINOS Display para móviles X-Reality, Dynamic Contrast, lustroso: si
Disco duro
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 20 GB libre
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, Audio Conexiones: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: microSD hasta 256 GB, 1 Lector de Huellas Digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: lector de huellas, acelerómetro, giroscopio, proximidad, barómetro, brújula, espectro de color, DLNA, Miracast, Wi-Fi Direct, App2SD, SAR Head: 1.08 W/kg, SAR Body: 1.25 W/kg
Equipamento de red
802.11a/ac/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (800, 850, 900, 1700, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (Bandas 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41), HSUPA hasta 5.76 Mbps, HSDPA up to 42.2 Mbps, LTE Cat 6 hasta 300 Mbps descarga, 50 Mbps subida, LTE, GPS
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 9.5 x 129 x 65
Battería
2700 mAh Litio-Ion, Tiempo de Conversación 2G (según el fabricante): 44 h, Tiempo de Conversación 3G (según el fabricante): 47 h, Standby 2G (según el fabricante): 750 h, Standby 3G (según el fabricante): 710 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 23 MPix (autofocus predictivo, Exmor-R sensor 1/2.3",gran angular 22 mm, Vídeo: 1080p60)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (f/2.4, Exmor-R sensor 1/5", gran angular 25 mm)
Características adicionales
Altavoces: estéreo frontal, Teclado: Virtual, Luz de Teclado: si, adaptador de 7.5w, cable USB, headset, guía de inicio rapido, información de mantenimiento, Xperia-Apps, Google-Apps, AVG Protection, SwiftKey, PlayStation, 24 Meses Garantía, USB Type-C, fanless
Peso
135 g, Suministro de Electricidad: 54 g
Precio
449 Euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

152.7 mm 74.7 mm 7.35 mm 161 g145.5 mm 71 mm 7.45 mm 153 g143 mm 69 mm 7.7 mm 152 g138.3 mm 67.1 mm 7.1 mm 143 g129 mm 65 mm 9.5 mm 135 g127 mm 65 mm 8.9 mm 138 g123.8 mm 58.6 mm 7.6 mm 113 g
Top: 3.5 mm headphones
Top: 3.5 mm headphones
Right: Camera button, volume rocker, standby/fingerprint scanner
Right: Camera button, volume rocker, standby/fingerprint scanner
Left: Combined slot for Nano-SIM and microSD
Left: Combined slot for Nano-SIM and microSD
Bottom: USB 2.0 Type-C
Bottom: USB 2.0 Type-C
Sony Xperia X Compact: Overview
Sony Xperia X Compact: Overview
Sony Xperia X Compact: Crossing
Sony Xperia X Compact: Crossing
Sony Xperia X Compact: Turning point
Sony Xperia X Compact: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Overview
Garmin Edge 500: Overview
Garmin Edge 500: Crossing
Garmin Edge 500: Crossing
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point

Comparación de Imágenes

Elige una escena y navega dentro de la primera imagen. Un click cambia el nivel de zoom. Un click en la imagen aumentada abre la original en una ventana nueva. La primera imagen muestra la fotografía escalada del dispositivo de pruebas.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click para cargar imágenes

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 51 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 9418 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

516
cd/m²
575
cd/m²
587
cd/m²
566
cd/m²
579
cd/m²
558
cd/m²
566
cd/m²
570
cd/m²
552
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 587 cd/m² Médio: 563.2 cd/m² Minimum: 5.04 cd/m²
iluminación: 88 %
Brillo con batería: 579 cd/m²
Contraste: 1448:1 (Negro: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.1 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
Gamma: 2.24
Sony Xperia X Compact
IPS, 1280x720, 4.6
Honor 8
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
IPS, 1280x720, 4.6
Apple iPhone SE
IPS, 1136x640, 4
Apple iPhone 6S
IPS, 1334x750, 4.7
Sony Xperia X
LCD, 1920x1080, 5
OnePlus 3
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen
-5%
-16%
6%
11%
-33%
3%
Brightness middle
579
451
-22%
547
-6%
603
4%
552
-5%
404
-30%
419
-28%
Brightness
563
443
-21%
532
-6%
579
3%
549
-2%
392
-30%
431
-23%
Brightness Distribution
88
93
6%
94
7%
93
6%
87
-1%
91
3%
84
-5%
Black Level *
0.4
0.4
-0%
0.54
-35%
0.88
-120%
0.39
2%
0.68
-70%
Contrast
1448
1128
-22%
1013
-30%
685
-53%
1415
-2%
594
-59%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.1
5.4
11%
7.37
-21%
1.8
70%
3.4
44%
7.1
-16%
4.1
33%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.5
9.9
6%
3.5
67%
13.2
-26%
12
-14%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7
6.7
4%
8.39
-20%
2.3
67%
4.16
41%
9.7
-39%
3.3
53%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.33 94%
2.28 96%
2.21 100%
2.21 100%
2.23 99%
2.1 105%
CCT
8395 77%
8262 79%
9074 72%
6955 93%
7288 89%
9502 68%
6550 99%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.9865
96.74
95.93
100
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
62.13
62.18
89.38

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
34 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 13 ms subida
↘ 21 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 88 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (25.1 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
48 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 21 ms subida
↘ 27 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 78 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (40 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
142090 Points ∼50% +86%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
126969 Points ∼45% +67%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
94671 Points ∼33% +24%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
77650 Points ∼27% +2%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
76216 Points ∼27%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
5645 Points ∼15% +45%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
4422 Points ∼12% +14%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
4386 Points ∼12% +13%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
3885 Points ∼10%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
3853 Points ∼10% -1%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
2539 Points ∼52% +67%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
2533 Points ∼52% +67%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
2398 Points ∼49% +58%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1518 Points ∼31%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1484 Points ∼30% -2%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
5481 Points ∼20% +64%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
4097 Points ∼15% +23%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
3343 Points ∼12%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
1754 Points ∼30% +26%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
1726 Points ∼30% +24%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1388 Points ∼24%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
2034 Points ∼45% +21%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
1935 Points ∼43% +16%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1675 Points ∼37%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
3249 Points ∼40% +275%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
867 Points ∼11%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
816 Points ∼10% -6%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
2823 Points ∼45% +191%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
971 Points ∼15%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
941 Points ∼15% -3%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
1912 Points ∼41% +13%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1697 Points ∼36%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1486 Points ∼32% -12%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
1211 Points ∼26% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
4804 Points ∼17% +250%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1373 Points ∼5%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1354 Points ∼5% -1%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
1066 Points ∼4% -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
3595 Points ∼27% +151%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1434 Points ∼11%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1381 Points ∼10% -4%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
1095 Points ∼8% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
2482 Points ∼57% +53%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
1892 Points ∼44% +17%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
1749 Points ∼40% +8%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1624 Points ∼38%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1504 Points ∼35% -7%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
1472 Points ∼34% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
2864 Points ∼45% +271%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
2524 Points ∼40% +227%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
1137 Points ∼18% +47%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
818 Points ∼13% +6%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
772 Points ∼12%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
761 Points ∼12% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
2571 Points ∼45% +194%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
2298 Points ∼40% +163%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
1198 Points ∼21% +37%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
961 Points ∼17% +10%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
874 Points ∼15%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
855 Points ∼15% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
2587 Points ∼58% +62%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
1789 Points ∼40% +12%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
1649 Points ∼37% +3%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1601 Points ∼36%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1441 Points ∼32% -10%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
1100 Points ∼25% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
4633 Points ∼44% +252%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
4255 Points ∼40% +223%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
2353 Points ∼22% +79%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1318 Points ∼12%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1280 Points ∼12% -3%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
1112 Points ∼10% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
3424 Points ∼44% +150%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
3149 Points ∼40% +130%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
1878 Points ∼24% +37%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1372 Points ∼18%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1313 Points ∼17% -4%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
1273 Points ∼16% -7%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
21771 Points ∼25% +55%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
15531 Points ∼18% +11%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
14023 Points ∼16%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
13717 Points ∼16% -2%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
13097 Points ∼15% -7%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
13065 Points ∼15% -7%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
10801 Points ∼12% -23%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
44059 Points ∼8% +106%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
42686 Points ∼8% +100%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
37319 Points ∼7% +75%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
34023 Points ∼6% +59%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
22157 Points ∼4% +4%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
21349 Points ∼4%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
21087 Points ∼4% -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
30241 Points ∼13% +58%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
29538 Points ∼12% +54%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
28419 Points ∼12% +49%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
26420 Points ∼11% +38%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
20235 Points ∼9% +6%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
19128 Points ∼8%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
17404 Points ∼7% -9%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
89 fps ∼1% +187%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
80.3 fps ∼1% +159%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
79.6 fps ∼1% +157%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
56 fps ∼0% +81%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
41 fps ∼0% +32%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
31 fps ∼0%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
30 fps ∼0% -3%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
60 fps ∼2% +18%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
59.2 fps ∼2% +16%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
59.1 fps ∼2% +16%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
57 fps ∼2% +12%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
51 fps ∼2%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
43 fps ∼1% -16%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
33 fps ∼1% -35%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
47 fps ∼9% +213%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
40 fps ∼7% +167%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
39.5 fps ∼7% +163%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
25 fps ∼5% +67%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
19 fps ∼3% +27%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
15 fps ∼3%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
9.2 fps ∼2% -39%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
58.1 fps ∼16% +94%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
56 fps ∼15% +87%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
46 fps ∼13% +53%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
45 fps ∼12% +50%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
30 fps ∼8%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
19 fps ∼5% -37%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
15 fps ∼4% -50%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
31 fps ∼1% +230%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
28.1 fps ∼1% +199%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
18 fps ∼0% +91%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
10 fps ∼0% +6%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
9.4 fps ∼0%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
4.6 fps ∼0% -51%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
57.9 fps ∼2% +163%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
38 fps ∼1% +73%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
30 fps ∼1% +36%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
22 fps ∼1%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
11 fps ∼0% -50%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
10 fps ∼0% -55%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
18 fps ∼5% +233%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
6.3 fps ∼2% +17%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
5.4 fps ∼1%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
5.3 fps ∼1% -2%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
18 fps ∼11% +50%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
12 fps ∼7%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
6.9 fps ∼4% -42%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
5.9 fps ∼3% -51%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
7101 Points ∼36% +49%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
6735 Points ∼34% +41%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
4770 Points ∼24%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
4379 Points ∼22% -8%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
4084 Points ∼21% -14%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
1226 Points ∼60% +20%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
1207 Points ∼59% +18%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
1112 Points ∼55% +9%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1019 Points ∼50%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
994 Points ∼49% -2%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
976 Points ∼48% -4%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
774 Points ∼38% -24%
Graphics
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
4813 Points ∼17% +194%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
4323 Points ∼15% +164%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
4175 Points ∼14% +155%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
3094 Points ∼11% +89%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
1703 Points ∼6% +4%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1638 Points ∼6%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1581 Points ∼5% -3%
Memory
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
2556 Points ∼34% +42%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
2052 Points ∼27% +14%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1796 Points ∼24%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1408 Points ∼19% -22%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
1281 Points ∼17% -29%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
1032 Points ∼14% -43%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
963 Points ∼13% -46%
System
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
5179 Points ∼31% +67%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
3952 Points ∼24% +27%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
3537 Points ∼21% +14%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
3466 Points ∼21% +12%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
3107 Points ∼19%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
2564 Points ∼16% -17%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
2082 Points ∼13% -33%
Overall
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
2496 Points ∼30% +43%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
2287 Points ∼27% +31%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
2194 Points ∼26% +26%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
2034 Points ∼24% +16%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1747 Points ∼21%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
1569 Points ∼19% -10%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1450 Points ∼17% -17%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
16550 Points ∼100% +85%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
16200 Points ∼98% +81%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
10692 Points ∼65% +19%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
9155 Points ∼55% +2%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
8952 Points ∼54%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
8388 Points ∼51% -6%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
5691 Points ∼34% -36%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
4210.4 ms * ∼100% -23%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
3677 ms * ∼87% -8%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
3417 ms * ∼81%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
2979 ms * ∼71% +13%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
2920.7 ms * ∼69% +15%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
1715 ms * ∼41% +50%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
1708.9 ms * ∼41% +50%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
187 Points ∼100% +72%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
186 Points ∼99% +71%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
138 Points ∼74% +27%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
122 Points ∼65% +12%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
109 Points ∼58%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
104 Points ∼56% -5%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
92 Points ∼49% -16%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
118.76 Points ∼100% +133%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
118.6 Points ∼100% +133%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
64.046 Points ∼54% +26%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
54.4 Points ∼46% +7%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
51 Points ∼43%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
50.92 Points ∼43% 0%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
49 Points ∼41% -4%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Sony Xperia X Compact
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Honor 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Sony Xperia X
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
AndroBench 3-5
50%
-22%
-17%
135%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
27.57
23.59
-14%
12.82
-54%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
32.54
53.68
65%
17.67
-46%
Random Write 4KB
9.3
31.5
239%
7.81
-16%
10.26
10%
18.23
96%
Random Read 4KB
31.52
34.16
8%
14.15
-55%
36.28
15%
137.62
337%
Sequential Write 256KB
139.49
119.25
-15%
88.91
-36%
117.38
-16%
153.3
10%
Sequential Read 256KB
207.87
247.46
19%
248.15
19%
184.33
-11%
408.71
97%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguracionesValor
 high30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguracionesValor
 high60 fps
Carga Máx.
 38.6 °C39.2 °C40.5 °C 
 37.8 °C39.8 °C41.2 °C 
 37.3 °C39 °C40.8 °C 
Máximo: 41.2 °C
Médio: 39.4 °C
37.4 °C40.9 °C41.8 °C
39.5 °C41.5 °C41.8 °C
37.7 °C41.5 °C40.8 °C
Máximo: 41.8 °C
Médio: 40.3 °C
Conector de corriente  32.8 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.642.62525.434.93125.330.14032.940.65033.638.26331.635.48028.428.81002725.912520.825.41602225.620021.332.725020.84031521.246.340019.452.750019.560.863017.762.680017.970.2100017.871.5125017.370.2160017.467200016.770.1250017.269.9315018.269.7400017.969.3500017.669.9630017.768.7800017.868.51000017.964.11250018.164.11600018.260.9SPL3081N1.348median 17.9median 64.1Delta1.311.731.632.825.430.425.332.132.933.333.63631.630.128.427.82725.420.825.62229.121.339.620.848.321.254.219.456.819.559.117.758.117.961.117.864.417.365.817.467.416.770.317.27118.277.117.979.117.673.517.772.117.87117.966.418.157.518.253.13084.71.353.4median 17.9median 61.11.310.734.243.535.434.229.238.729.729.238.336.729.538.329.934.329.729.935.747.939.735.727.739.133.927.727.330.428.527.3312528.23129.623.32629.636.724.820.636.744.829.420.744.847.834.820.647.854.236.92154.254.43818.454.458.743.418.758.763.747.217.963.767.852.218.667.871.457.217.571.470.356.616.970.369.655.817.469.669.255.116.269.266.551.816.966.566.550.717.566.569.352.117.269.375.556.717.775.576.456.917.476.474.65517.674.667.948.817.667.957.741.717.857.754.741.417.954.783.266.329.883.25419.51.354median 66.5median 48.8median 17.8median 66.59.3101.69.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSony Xperia X CompactHonor 8Apple iPhone SE
Sony Xperia X Compact audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.95 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Honor 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple iPhone SE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.15 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.11 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.33 / 1.48 / 1.6 Watt
Carga midlight 4.83 / 8.66 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Sony Xperia X Compact
 Wh, 4.6, 1280x720
Honor 8
11.4 Wh, 5.2, 1920x1080
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
 Wh, 4.6, 1280x720
Apple iPhone SE
6.21 Wh, 4, 1136x640
Apple iPhone 6S
7 Wh, 4.7, 1334x750
Sony Xperia X
 Wh, 5, 1920x1080
OnePlus 3
 Wh, 5.5, 1920x1080
Power Consumption
-32%
-18%
7%
3%
-20%
-17%
Idle Minimum *
0.33
0.78
-136%
0.6
-82%
0.54
-64%
0.5
-52%
0.56
-70%
0.57
-73%
Idle Average *
1.48
1.89
-28%
1.4
5%
1.26
15%
1.6
-8%
1.69
-14%
1.24
16%
Idle Maximum *
1.6
2.02
-26%
1.7
-6%
1.4
12%
1.9
-19%
1.75
-9%
1.36
15%
Load Average *
4.83
5.28
-9%
5.3
-10%
2.45
49%
2.5
48%
6.01
-24%
5.92
-23%
Load Maximum *
8.66
5.44
37%
8.4
3%
6.46
25%
4.8
45%
7.03
19%
10.53
-22%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
47h 24min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 01min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 24min
Carga (máximo brillo)
3h 06min
Sony Xperia X Compact
2700 mAh,  Wh
Honor 8
3000 mAh, 11.4 Wh
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
 mAh,  Wh
Apple iPhone SE
1624 mAh, 6.21 Wh
Apple iPhone 6S
 mAh, 7 Wh
Sony Xperia X
2620 mAh,  Wh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh,  Wh
Duración de Batería
-11%
-9%
-3%
-20%
-22%
17%
Reader / Idle
2844
1487
-48%
2249
-21%
1274
-55%
1510
-47%
1240
-56%
1338
-53%
H.264
624
526
-16%
525
-16%
759
22%
699
12%
518
-17%
847
36%
WiFi v1.3
601
499
-17%
440
-27%
673
12%
492
-18%
434
-28%
840
40%
Load
186
255
37%
242
30%
207
11%
137
-26%
213
15%
268
44%

Pro

+ buenísima calidad de construcción
+ buen rendimiento
+ gran aguante de batería en la práctica
+ USB Type-C
+ altavoces decentes
+ buena cámara
+ brillante display
+ ampliación de almacenamiento por microSD

Contra

- superficies lustrosas sensibles
- chasis relativamente grueso
- sólo USB 2.0
- más lento que los modelos anteriores en ciertos escenarios
- sin certificación IP (agua, polvo)
- no graba vídeos 4K
Sony Xperia X Compact. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Notebooksbilliger.
Sony Xperia X Compact. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Notebooksbilliger.

Tras el análisis del nuevo Xperia X Compact, nos decepciona un poco que ya no haya más teléfonos Android compactos de gama alta. Si quieres los componentes más rápidos, tendrás que tener un dispositivo más grande o ir a Apple.

Sin embargo, una vez lo has aceptado, verás que el nuevo Sony es un smartphone mainstream muy sólido, y el precio también se ha reducido respecto al anterior Xperia Z5 Compact. Sí, el rendimiento es inferior en algunas situaciones, pero difícilmente te darás cuenta, y el rendimiento gaming en particular se beneficia de la resolución relativamente baja del display. Un defecto es la falta de certificación IP, y las sensibles y lustrosas superficies de plástico tampoco serán del gusto de todos. Sí nos gusta el gran aguante de la batería.

Ya no es de gama alta: El Sony Xperia X Compact ahora es un dispositivo mainstream. No obstante, el compacto smartphone no revela ningún problema serio y el rendimiento también es más que suficiente en la práctica, pero la competencia es muy fuerte en este nivel de precios.

A 449 Euros (PVP actual ~410 Euros), el Xperia X Compact se enfrenta a fuertes rivales tales como el mini insignia Honor 8 y el OnePlus 3. Sendos dispositivos son más rápidos y tienen pantallas más grandes; por lo demás las diferencias son bastante pequeñas. El predecesor Xperia Z5 Compact también está disponible: soporta grabación de vídeo 4K y la carcasa aguanta más gracias al certificado IP. Si estás buscando un sistema aún más compacto con componentes más rápidos, estás limitado a Apple (iPhone SE) por ahora.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Sony Xperia X Compact - 10/21/2016 v5.1(old)
Andreas Osthoff

Acabado
82%
Teclado
68 / 75 → 90%
Ratón
94%
Conectividad
46 / 60 → 77%
Peso
94%
Battería
92%
Pantalla
85%
Rendimiento de juegos
45 / 63 → 71%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
55 / 70 → 78%
Temperatura
85%
Ruido
100%
Audio
72 / 91 → 79%
Cámara
73%
Médio
76%
87%
Smartphone - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Smartphone Sony Xperia X Compact
Andreas Osthoff, 2016-10-28 (Update: 2016-10-28)