Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del portátil Jumper EZBook 3 (N3350, FHD)

Clon del MacBook Air. Jumper actualiza su EZBook a la plataforma Apollo Lake más reciente que incluye un SoC Celeron N3350 dual-core. Un panel Full HD, muy poco peso y, sobre todo, un precio muy reducido elevan las expectativas sobre el dispositivo. Encuentra a que se ha tenido que renunciar para conseguir un dispositivo así a este precio.
Klaus Hinum, Katja Steyrleuthner (traducido por Fernando Alvarez Ude),
Jumper EZbook 3 (EZbook Serie)
Procesador
Intel Celeron N3350 2 x 1.1 - 2.4 GHz, Apollo Lake
Adaptador gráfico
Intel HD Graphics 500, Núcleo: 450 MHz, 4590
Memoría
4096 MB 
, DDR3 800 MHz ?-15-15-34
pantalla
14.1 pulgadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels 156 PPI, MS_9003, TN LED, lustroso: no
Placa base
Apollo Lake
Disco duro
Toshiba 064G93 64 GB eMMC, 64 GB 
, 38 GB libre
Tarjeta de sonido
RealTek ALC269 @ Intel Apollo Lake SoC - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, Audio Conexiones: auriculares, Card Reader: micro-SD
Equipamento de red
Realtek RTL8723B USB 2.0 (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.0
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 21 x 330 x 220
Battería
38 Wh Litio-Polimero, 7.6V, Duración de la Batería (según el fabricante): 4 h
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Primary Camera: 0.3 MPix
Características adicionales
Altavoces: stereo, Teclado: chiclet, Luz de Teclado: no, 12 Meses Garantía, fanless
Released
02/01/2017
Peso
1.225 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 111 g
Precio
343 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

339.4 mm 234.9 mm 17.9 mm 1.6 kg330 mm 220 mm 21 mm 1.2 kg329.2 mm 220.5 mm 20.5 mm 1.4 kg325 mm 227 mm 17 mm 1.4 kg280.5 mm 196.5 mm 13.1 mm 920 g
Samsung T3 USB SSD in left USB 3.0 port
Samsung T3 USB SSD in left USB 3.0 port
Samsung T3 USB SSD in right USB 2.0 port
Samsung T3 USB SSD in right USB 2.0 port
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
 
49.23 MB/s ∼100% +155%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
 
22.7 MB/s ∼46% +18%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
 
20.56 MB/s ∼42% +7%
Jumper EZbook 3
 
19.3 MB/s ∼39%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
 
19.1 MB/s ∼39% -1%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
 
82.06 MB/s ∼100% +199%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
 
37 MB/s ∼45% +35%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
 
34.5 MB/s ∼42% +26%
Jumper EZbook 3
 
27.4 MB/s ∼33%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
 
26.6 MB/s ∼32% -3%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Chuwi LapBook 14 inch 2017
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
349 MBit/s ∼100% +306%
Asus Zenbook UX3410UA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
323 MBit/s ∼93% +276%
Jumper EZbook 3
Realtek RTL8723B USB 2.0
86 MBit/s ∼25%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (jseb)
71 MBit/s ∼20% -17%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro
802.11 b/g/n
40.6 MBit/s ∼12% -53%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zenbook UX3410UA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
469 MBit/s ∼100% +501%
Chuwi LapBook 14 inch 2017
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
311 MBit/s ∼66% +299%
Jumper EZbook 3
Realtek RTL8723B USB 2.0
78 MBit/s ∼17%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (jseb)
72 MBit/s ∼15% -8%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro
802.11 b/g/n
41.6 MBit/s ∼9% -47%
352
cd/m²
351
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
351
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
309
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
356
cd/m²
293
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
MS_9003
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 384 cd/m² Médio: 341.3 cd/m² Minimum: 3.1 cd/m²
iluminación: 76 %
Brillo con batería: 384 cd/m²
Contraste: 300:1 (Negro: 1.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.7 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 11.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6
Gamma: 2.2
Jumper EZbook 3
MS_9003, TN LED, 1920x1080, 14.1
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
Chi Mei N140BGA-EA3, TN LED, 1366x768, 14
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
APPA027, IPS, 2304x1440, 12
Teclast Tbook 10s
LCD, IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
VOYO VBook V3
Chi Mei N116HSE, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3
Cube i7 Book CDK09
Samsung LTN140W1-L01, IPS, 1920x1080, 10.6
Response Times
-43%
-76%
-58%
-126%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
46 (25, 21)
32 (10, 22)
30%
41.2 (15.6, 25.6)
10%
40 (21, 19)
13%
49 (27, 22)
-7%
Response Time Black / White *
11.6 (7.7, 3.8)
30 (16, 14)
-159%
30.4 (6.8, 23.6)
-162%
26.4 (14, 12.4)
-128%
40 (19, 21)
-245%
PWM Frequency
200 (99)
200 (90)
0%
Screen
22%
64%
45%
36%
51%
Brightness middle
384
270
-30%
387
1%
279
-27%
195
-49%
384
0%
Brightness
341
247
-28%
358
5%
280
-18%
200
-41%
370
9%
Brightness Distribution
76
80
5%
88
16%
82
8%
72
-5%
89
17%
Black Level *
1.28
0.57
55%
0.47
63%
0.29
77%
0.24
81%
0.37
71%
Contrast
300
474
58%
823
174%
962
221%
813
171%
1038
246%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
8.7
3.01
65%
1.6
82%
6.7
23%
5
43%
5.8
33%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
16.7
6.33
62%
4
76%
10.8
35%
9.31
44%
19.8
-19%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
11.1
12.73
-15%
1
91%
6.8
39%
5.98
46%
5.1
54%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.36 93%
2.26 97%
2.27 97%
2.17 101%
2.4 92%
CCT
12445 52%
14629 44%
6680 97%
8466 77%
6764 96%
7125 91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
39
61.6
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
62
82.2
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
-11% / 4%
-6% / 36%
-7% / 24%
-45% / 4%
51% / 51%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
11.6 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 7.7 ms subida
↘ 3.8 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 15 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (24.4 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
46 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 25 ms subida
↘ 21 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 72 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (38.7 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado 200 Hz ≤ 99 % de brillo

La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 200 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 99 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM.

La frecuencia de 200 Hz es relativamente baja, por lo que la gente sensible debería ver parpadeos y padecer fatiga visual por la pantalla (usado al brillo indicado a continuación).

Comparación: 51 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 9599 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
91 Points ∼100% +98%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
90 Points ∼99% +96%
Cube i7 Book CDK09
Intel Core m3-6Y30
89 Points ∼98% +93%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
53 Points ∼58% +15%
Jumper EZbook 3
Intel Celeron N3350
46 Points ∼51%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
Intel Pentium N3710
41 Points ∼45% -11%
HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360
Intel Celeron N3050
35 Points ∼38% -24%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
218 Points ∼100% +160%
Cube i7 Book CDK09
Intel Core m3-6Y30
211 Points ∼97% +151%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
165 Points ∼76% +96%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
Intel Pentium N3710
152 Points ∼70% +81%
Jumper EZbook 3
Intel Celeron N3350
84 Points ∼39%
HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360
Intel Celeron N3050
65 Points ∼30% -23%
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
2654
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
1503
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
2941
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit
0.91 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit
4.25 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit
0.46 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
0.6 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
1.07 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.7 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
10.9 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
84 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
46 Points
ayuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256
3550 Points ∼52% +61%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
HD Graphics 505, Pentium N4200, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0
2801 Points ∼41% +27%
Jumper EZbook 3
HD Graphics 500, Celeron N3350, Toshiba 064G93 64 GB eMMC
2207 Points ∼32%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1595 Points ∼23% -28%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
1464 Points ∼21% -34%
Teclast Tbook 10s
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1329 Points ∼19% -40%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Cube i7 Book CDK09
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, FORESEE 64GB O1229B
2976 Points ∼49% +87%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256
2550 Points ∼42% +60%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2114 Points ∼35% +33%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
HD Graphics 505, Pentium N4200, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0
2073 Points ∼34% +30%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
1661 Points ∼27% +4%
Jumper EZbook 3
HD Graphics 500, Celeron N3350, Toshiba 064G93 64 GB eMMC
1592 Points ∼26%
Teclast Tbook 10s
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1088 Points ∼18% -32%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
1592 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
2207 puntos
PCMark 10 Score
1195 puntos
ayuda
Jumper EZbook 3
Toshiba 064G93 64 GB eMMC
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz
Apple SSD AP0256
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
128 GB eMMC Flash
Chuwi Hi12
Hynix HCG8E 64 GB
Acer Aspire ES1-521-87DN
Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPVX
HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360
Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E680
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
1814%
265%
155%
134%
-32%
-38%
Write 4k QD32
2.74
223.9
8072%
15.41
462%
12.66
362%
12.1
342%
1.239
-55%
1.003
-63%
Read 4k QD32
16.4
271.9
1558%
98.9
503%
35.12
114%
35.3
115%
1.03
-94%
0.898
-95%
Write 4k
2.47
24.87
907%
14.67
494%
13.04
428%
11.4
362%
1.171
-53%
1.026
-58%
Read 4k
5.07
16.28
221%
15.95
215%
13.2
160%
17.9
253%
0.419
-92%
0.407
-92%
Write 512
41.3
736.6
1684%
41.49
0%
75.61
83%
44.8
8%
49.35
19%
39.03
-5%
Read 512
133
671.5
405%
283.9
113%
153.8
16%
132
-1%
36.63
-72%
33.53
-75%
Write Seq
50
660.1
1220%
124.2
148%
85.04
70%
50
0%
107.5
115%
106.1
112%
Read Seq
151
820.9
444%
428
183%
166.5
10%
141
-7%
109.6
-27%
106
-30%
Toshiba 064G93 64 GB eMMC
Sequential Read: 151 MB/s
Sequential Write: 50 MB/s
512K Read: 133 MB/s
512K Write: 41.3 MB/s
4K Read: 5.07 MB/s
4K Write: 2.47 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 16.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 2.74 MB/s
0255075100125150175200225250275300325350375400425450475500525550575600625650675700725750775800825850875900925950975100010251050107511001125115011751200122512501275130013251350137514001425145014751500152515501575160016251650167517001725175017751800182518501875190019251950197520002025205020752100Tooltip
3DMark Cloud Gate Score
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
1001 Points ∼100% +119%
Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D
Intel HD Graphics 510, Intel Core i5-6198DU
847 Points ∼85% +85%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel HD Graphics 505, Intel Pentium N4200
583 Points ∼58% +27%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710
496 Points ∼50% +8%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710
463 Points ∼46% +1%
Jumper EZbook 3
Intel HD Graphics 500, Intel Celeron N3350
458 Points ∼46%
Acer Switch One 10 SW1-011-14UQ
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8300
298 Points ∼30% -35%
3DMark 06 Standard
3393 puntos
3DMark 11 Performance
505 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
2074 puntos
ayuda
World of Warships - 1366x768 Low Preset AF:Trilinear
MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD
Intel HD Graphics (Haswell), Intel Celeron 2970M
41.4 (21min - 51max) fps ∼100% +117%
Acer Aspire ES1-521-87DN
AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD A8-6410
28.6 fps ∼69% +50%
Jumper EZbook 3
Intel HD Graphics 500, Intel Celeron N3350
19.1 (7min - 28max) fps ∼46%
Acer Extensa 2519-C7DC
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), Intel Celeron N3050
16.8 fps ∼41% -12%
Chuwi Hi12
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8300
13.9 (7min - 19max) fps ∼34% -27%
bajo medio alto ultra
World of Warcraft (2005) 46 fps
Diablo III (2012) 12.7 fps
Counter-Strike: GO (2012) 14 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 15.9 fps
World of Warships (2015) 19.1 fps
Team Fortress 2 (2017) 21.2 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 5.3 fps
World of Tanks enCore (2018) 34 (error at the end) 4 (error at the end) fps
Strange Brigade (2018) 0 game wont start fps
League of Legends (2019) 28.2 20.2 13.9 12.6 fps
Hearthstone (2020) 23.9 24 11.2 fps
Valorant (2020) 9.09 fps
Carga Máx.
 41 °C37 °C29 °C 
 39 °C34 °C29 °C 
 32 °C32 °C26 °C 
Máximo: 41 °C
Médio: 33.2 °C
29 °C38 °C42 °C
30 °C34 °C38 °C
29 °C30 °C30 °C
Máximo: 42 °C
Médio: 33.3 °C
Conector de corriente  38 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22 to 57 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.5 °C / 83.3 F (-3.5 °C / -6.3 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.342.72534.235.53135.134.2403433.45033.433.26332.430.48030.928.510034.533.712536.325.816030.125.720038.923.92503823.331543.822.640050.721.350054.320.363058.219.980068.719.310007318.812507018.6160066.118.1200066.717.8250069.717.7315070.917.8400070.817.9500068.11863006418800063.618.5100006222.51250056.519.61600055.118.3SPL80.431.2N44.61.6median 62median 19.3Delta11.72.735.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseJumper EZbook 3Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Jumper EZbook 3 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.13 / 0.17 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3.18 / 6.14 / 6.4 Watt
Carga midlight 13.3 / 13.6 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Jumper EZbook 3
Celeron N3350, HD Graphics 500, Toshiba 064G93 64 GB eMMC, TN LED, 1920x1080, 14.1
Chuwi Hi10 Pro
Z8300, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
N3060, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz
6Y75, HD Graphics 515, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2304x1440, 12
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
N3710, HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), 128 GB eMMC Flash, TN LED, 1366x768, 14
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Pentium N4200, HD Graphics 505, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0, TN LED, 1366x768, 13.3
HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360
N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E680, IPS, 1366x768, 11.6
Power Consumption
23%
-3%
-11%
-21%
-32%
-33%
Idle Minimum *
3.18
1.4
56%
3.9
-23%
2
37%
4.1
-29%
4.5
-42%
5.3
-67%
Idle Average *
6.14
4.82
21%
6.4
-4%
2.06
66%
8.3
-35%
7.6
-24%
7.1
-16%
Idle Maximum *
6.4
5.43
15%
6.5
-2%
6.94
-8%
8.6
-34%
8.5
-33%
8.2
-28%
Load Average *
13.3
11.61
13%
11.1
17%
22.52
-69%
13.5
-2%
17.4
-31%
15.5
-17%
Load Maximum *
13.6
12.48
8%
13.8
-1%
24.87
-83%
14.5
-7%
17.6
-29%
18.9
-39%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
7h 00min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 54min
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
N3710, HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), 55 Wh
661 min ∼100% +57%
Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03
5650U, HD Graphics 6000, 54 Wh
620 min ∼94% +48%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz
6Y75, HD Graphics 515, 41.4 Wh
554 min ∼84% +32%
Jumper EZbook 3
Celeron N3350, HD Graphics 500, 38 Wh
420 min ∼64%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
6200U, GeForce 940MX, 40 Wh
389 min ∼59% -7%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-51-731X
6500U, HD Graphics 520, 48.9 Wh
354 min ∼54% -16%
VOYO VBook V3
Z8300, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail),  Wh
208 min ∼31% -50%

Pro

+ Bajo precio
+ Brillante panel FullHD y pantalla mate
+ Refrigeración sin ruido
+ SoC eficiente

Contra

- Pantalla con malos ángulos de visualización
- Plastico muy fácil de rayar
- Procesador lento que afecta al rendimiento global
- PWM a 200 Hz hasta un brillo del 99 %
- La batería tarda mucho en recargarse
- Webcam mal situada y de escasa calidad
Jumper EZBook 3
Jumper EZBook 3

El EZBook es un portátil asequible y ligero con una pantalla brillante y mate, no hace ruido (gracias a la ventilación pasiva) y tiene una bonita apariencia. Como suele ser habitual, ha habido que prescindir de algunas características para reducir el precio. Una construcción y calidad mediocres, escasos ángulos de visualización, PWM a 200 Hz, rendimiento escaso y una corta duración de batería son los inconvenientes que encontrarás. A pesar de que el teclado y el touchpad están muy lejos de los del parecido MacBook Air, funcionan para trabajos ocasionales. Al igual que muchos productos chinos, el EZBook 3 no posee certidicación CE, y el usuario depende casi totalmente de la tienda en la que haya comprado el dispositivo para hacer efectiva la garantía. No hay soporte para drivers. Sin embargo, al menos, es posible usar los drivers de Intel.

El EZBook 3 se encuentra disponible en plateado en Gearbest por 194.25 Euros o desde el almacén europeo por 343 euros. Este precio resultará muy atractivo para los usuarios a los que no les importen los problemas ya mencionados.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Jumper EZbook 3 - 03/24/2017 v6(old)
Klaus Hinum

Acabado
62 /  98 → 63%
Teclado
72%
Ratón
78%
Conectividad
36 / 80 → 45%
Peso
72 / 35-78 → 87%
Battería
90%
Pantalla
74%
Rendimiento de juegos
42 / 68 → 62%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
49 / 87 → 56%
Temperatura
92 / 91 → 100%
Ruido
100%
Audio
56 / 91 → 62%
Cámara
40 / 85 → 47%
Médio
66%
77%
Subnotebook - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del portátil Jumper EZBook 3 (N3350, FHD)
Klaus Hinum, 2017-03-29 (Update: 2017-05-23)