Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT (Celeron N3060, HD)

Allen Ngo (traducido por Francisco García), 11/03/2016

Barato y lento. La CPU Celeron de 6 W ofrece una experiencia Windows 10 insuficiente incluso cuando la equipas con un SSD primario. Funcionamiento silencioso y gran aguante de batería son los principales beneficios de una configuración de tan poca potencia.

HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT (250 Serie)
Procesador
Adaptador gráfico
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) - 1024 MB, Núcleo: 360 MHz, Memoría: 800 MHz, DDR3, 20.19.15.4474
Memoría
4096 MB 
, DDR3, PC3-12800, 11-11-11-28, Single-Channel
pantalla
15.6 pulgadas 16:9, 1366x768 pixels 100 PPI, LG Philips LGD0504, TN LED, lustroso: no
Disco duro
Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP, 128 GB 
Tarjeta de sonido
Realtek ALC235 @ Intel Cherry Trail / Braswell SoC - HD Audio Controller
Conexiones
2 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, Audio Conexiones: clavija headset 3.5mm, Card Reader: SD
Equipamento de red
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2 w/ WiDi
Unidad óptica
hp DVDRW DU8A6SH
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 24.3 x 384.3 x 254.5
Battería
41 Wh Litio-Ion, 4 celdas
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionales
Altavoces: Stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, Luz de Teclado: no, DTS Audio Control, 12 Meses Garantía
Peso
1.96 kg
Precio
300 USD

 

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: SD reader, USB 2.0, Optical drive, Kensington Lock
Right: SD reader, USB 2.0, Optical drive, Kensington Lock
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: AC adapter, VGA-out, Gigabit Ethernet, HDMI, USB 3.0, USB 2.0, 3.5 mm combo audio
Left: AC adapter, VGA-out, Gigabit Ethernet, HDMI, USB 3.0, USB 2.0, 3.5 mm combo audio
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15-9550 i7
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
121 MB/s ∼100% +433%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
22.7 MB/s ∼19% 0%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
22.7 MB/s ∼19%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15-9550 i7
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
211 MB/s ∼100% +693%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.5 MB/s ∼13% +3%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26.6 MB/s ∼13%
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m 512KB
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
530.963 MBit/s ∼100% +218%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
166.721 MBit/s ∼31%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 512KB
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
549.653 MBit/s ∼100% +121%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
248.416 MBit/s ∼45%
214.2
cd/m²
198.1
cd/m²
182.2
cd/m²
206.4
cd/m²
199.8
cd/m²
181.5
cd/m²
213.2
cd/m²
205.6
cd/m²
187.9
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Máximo: 214.2 cd/m² Médio: 198.8 cd/m² Minimum: 11.9 cd/m²
iluminación: 85 %
Brillo con batería: 199.8 cd/m²
Contraste: 281:1 (Negro: 0.712 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 13.24 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 13.33 | - Ø
53.4% sRGB (Argyll) 33.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 1.69
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
LG Philips LGD0504, TN LED, 15.6, 1366x768
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
ChiMei N156BGE-E32, TN LED, 15.6, 1366x768
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
Chi Mei N156BGE-EA2, TN LED, 15.6, 1366x768
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Chi Mei N156BGE-E42, TN LED, 15.6, 1366x768
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
ChiMei, TN LED, 15.6, 1366x768
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
AU Optronics AUO38ED, TN, 15.6, 1920x1080
Response Times
-16%
33%
42%
9%
15%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
42.4
52
-23%
28
34%
20
53%
42
1%
40
6%
Response Time Black / White *
28.8
31
-8%
20
31%
20
31%
24
17%
22
24%
PWM Frequency
1000
200
200
806
Screen
22%
28%
44%
23%
21%
Brightness
199
200
1%
230
16%
200
1%
203
2%
222
12%
Brightness Distribution
85
83
-2%
84
-1%
87
2%
83
-2%
85
0%
Black Level *
0.712
0.43
40%
0.46
35%
0.26
63%
0.49
31%
0.39
45%
Contrast
281
491
75%
533
90%
827
194%
449
60%
562
100%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
13.24
10.53
20%
8.34
37%
13.07
1%
8.95
32%
12.67
4%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
13.33
11.85
11%
9.48
29%
4.34
67%
10.59
21%
13.82
-4%
Gamma
1.69 142%
2.25 107%
2.38 101%
2.48 97%
2.51 96%
2.63 91%
CCT
15879 41%
13758 47%
10624 61%
7212 90%
12049 54%
15633 42%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
33.8
39
15%
38
12%
38
12%
41
21%
35
4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
53.4
61
14%
57
7%
60
12%
65
22%
55
3%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
3% / 14%
31% / 29%
43% / 44%
16% / 21%
18% / 19%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
28.8 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 10.8 ms subida
↘ 18 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 64 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (27.1 ms).
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
42.4 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 14.8 ms subida
↘ 27.6 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 54 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (43.7 ms).

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 59 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 4396 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

 
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel Core i5-6200U
116 Points ∼52% +214%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
108 Points ∼48% +192%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M
Intel Core i5-4200U
96 Points ∼43% +159%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
88 Points ∼39% +138%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Intel Core i5-6200U
87 Points ∼39% +135%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
Intel Pentium N3540
40 Points ∼18% +8%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
37 Points ∼17%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel Celeron N3050
33 Points ∼15% -11%
VOYO VBook V3
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
28 Points ∼13% -24%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel Core i5-6200U
288 Points ∼15% +324%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Intel Core i5-6200U
261 Points ∼14% +284%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
257 Points ∼14% +278%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M
Intel Core i5-4200U
228 Points ∼12% +235%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
206 Points ∼11% +203%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
Intel Pentium N3540
151 Points ∼8% +122%
VOYO VBook V3
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
94 Points ∼5% +38%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
68 Points ∼4%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel Celeron N3050
61 Points ∼3% -10%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
1.28 Points ∼58% +212%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M
Intel Core i5-4200U
1.13 Points ∼51% +176%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
0.98 Points ∼45% +139%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
0.41 Points ∼19%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
2.81 Points ∼14% +227%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M
Intel Core i5-4200U
2.48 Points ∼12% +188%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
2.27 Points ∼11% +164%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
0.86 Points ∼4%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
4134 Points ∼47% +240%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M
Intel Core i5-4200U
3712 Points ∼42% +205%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Intel Core i5-6200U
3505 Points ∼40% +188%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
3286 Points ∼37% +170%
Acer One 10 S1002-17HU
Intel Atom Z3735F
1829 Points ∼21% +50%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
Intel Pentium N3540
1340 Points ∼15% +10%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
1216 Points ∼14%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel Celeron N3050
1019 Points ∼11% -16%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Intel Core i5-6200U
9080 Points ∼22% +302%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
8672 Points ∼21% +284%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M
Intel Core i5-4200U
7614 Points ∼19% +238%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
6994 Points ∼17% +210%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
Intel Pentium N3540
4454 Points ∼11% +97%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
2256 Points ∼6%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel Celeron N3050
1978 Points ∼5% -12%
Acer One 10 S1002-17HU
Intel Atom Z3735F
822 Points ∼2% -64%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
1361.23 s * ∼16%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
787.585 s * ∼9% +42%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
1566.11 Seconds * ∼7%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
898 Seconds * ∼4% +43%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
2510
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
2256
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
1216
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
0.86 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
10.12 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
0.41 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
37 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
13.08 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
68 Points
ayuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
4343 Points ∼67% +197%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
4249 Points ∼65% +190%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M
GeForce 840M, 4200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
3468 Points ∼53% +137%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
1464 Points ∼22%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142
1426 Points ∼22% -3%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142
1269 Points ∼19% -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1224 Points ∼19% -16%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
3735 Points ∼40% +110%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
3605 Points ∼39% +103%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M
GeForce 840M, 4200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
2804 Points ∼30% +58%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
1779 Points ∼19%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142
1624 Points ∼17% -9%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142
1265 Points ∼14% -29%
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
3317 Points ∼56% +100%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
3237 Points ∼54% +95%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABF050
2834 Points ∼47% +71%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M
GeForce 840M, 4200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
2674 Points ∼45% +61%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
1661 Points ∼28%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142
1598 Points ∼27% -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1419 Points ∼24% -15%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142
1413 Points ∼24% -15%
Medion Akoya S2218
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1027 Points ∼17% -38%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
1661 puntos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
1779 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
1464 puntos
ayuda
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Toshiba MQ01ABF050
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-83%
-84%
-85%
-82%
141%
Write 4k QD32
31.08
0.769
-98%
0.648
-98%
0.641
-98%
1.287
-96%
228.5
635%
Read 4k QD32
94.55
0.675
-99%
0.818
-99%
0.789
-99%
1.116
-99%
141.3
49%
Write 4k
31.52
0.782
-98%
0.649
-98%
0.619
-98%
1.29
-96%
88.01
179%
Read 4k
17.21
0.375
-98%
0.374
-98%
0.335
-98%
0.522
-97%
20.99
22%
Write 512
134.7
38.3
-72%
38.77
-71%
34.84
-74%
42.22
-69%
289.4
115%
Read 512
338.1
33
-90%
33.74
-90%
20.79
-94%
38.12
-89%
321.2
-5%
Write Seq
139.2
95.72
-31%
91.07
-35%
89.77
-36%
99.56
-28%
322.1
131%
Read Seq
484.4
104.7
-78%
103.5
-79%
98.34
-80%
101
-79%
508.9
5%
Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
Sequential Read: 484.4 MB/s
Sequential Write: 139.2 MB/s
512K Read: 338.1 MB/s
512K Write: 134.7 MB/s
4K Read: 17.21 MB/s
4K Write: 31.52 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 94.55 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 31.08 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M
NVIDIA GeForce 840M, 4200U
1774 Points ∼11% +329%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U
1525 Points ∼10% +268%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
1196 Points ∼7% +189%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
915 Points ∼6% +121%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050
424 Points ∼3% +2%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060
414 Points ∼3%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540
239 Points ∼1% -42%
Acer One 10 S1002-17HU
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F
207 Points ∼1% -50%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M
NVIDIA GeForce 840M, 4200U
2335 Points ∼5% +511%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U
1834 Points ∼4% +380%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
1257 Points ∼2% +229%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
1162 Points ∼2% +204%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050
384 Points ∼1% +1%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060
382 Points ∼1%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540
200 Points ∼0% -48%
Acer One 10 S1002-17HU
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F
181 Points ∼0% -53%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Physics
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
3086 Points ∼8% +362%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U
2913 Points ∼7% +336%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M
NVIDIA GeForce 840M, 4200U
2401 Points ∼6% +259%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540
1815 Points ∼5% +172%
Acer One 10 S1002-17HU
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F
994 Points ∼3% +49%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050
740 Points ∼2% +11%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060
668 Points ∼2%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M
NVIDIA GeForce 840M, 4200U
8813 Points ∼5% +362%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
6314 Points ∼4% +231%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U
5592 Points ∼3% +193%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050
2117 Points ∼1% +11%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060
1907 Points ∼1%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540
1290 Points ∼1% -32%
Acer One 10 S1002-17HU
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F
1190 Points ∼1% -38%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M
NVIDIA GeForce 840M, 4200U
5530 Points ∼11% +310%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
5123 Points ∼10% +279%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U
4643 Points ∼9% +244%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050
1497 Points ∼3% +11%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540
1378 Points ∼3% +2%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060
1350 Points ∼3%
Acer One 10 S1002-17HU
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F
1140 Points ∼2% -16%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Physics
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060
8087 Points ∼12%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060
14334 Points ∼4%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Score
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060
12233 Points ∼7%
3DMark 11 Performance
422 puntos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
18104 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
1350 puntos
ayuda
BioShock Infinite
1366x768 Medium Preset
Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH
18.8 fps ∼100% +96%
Samsung ATIV Book 9 900X3G-K01
HD Graphics 4400, 4200U, Samsung PM851 Series MZMTE256HMHP
17.6 fps ∼94% +83%
HP Split x2 13-m210eg
HD Graphics 4200, 4210Y, Micron RealSSD C400 MTFDDAT064MAM-1J2 64 GB
12.9 fps ∼69% +34%
Lenovo ThinkPad Helix
HD Graphics 4000, 3317U, Intel SSD 525 Series SSDMCEAC180A3L
12.7 fps ∼68% +32%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, Liteonit CV3-8D256
11.4 fps ∼61% +19%
Acer Aspire Switch 10V SW5-014-1742
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142
10.01 fps ∼53% +4%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
9.6 fps ∼51%
Dell Latitude 11 3150
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540, Samsung SSD PM851 128 GB MZ7TE128HMGR
7.08 fps ∼38% -26%
1280x720 Very Low Preset
Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH
35.6 fps ∼100% +97%
Samsung ATIV Book 9 900X3G-K01
HD Graphics 4400, 4200U, Samsung PM851 Series MZMTE256HMHP
33.1 fps ∼93% +83%
Lenovo ThinkPad Helix
HD Graphics 4000, 3317U, Intel SSD 525 Series SSDMCEAC180A3L
27.7 fps ∼78% +53%
HP Split x2 13-m210eg
HD Graphics 4200, 4210Y, Micron RealSSD C400 MTFDDAT064MAM-1J2 64 GB
24 fps ∼67% +33%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, Liteonit CV3-8D256
22.2 fps ∼62% +23%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
18.1 fps ∼51%
Acer Aspire Switch 10V SW5-014-1742
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142
16 fps ∼45% -12%
Dell Latitude 11 3150
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540, Samsung SSD PM851 128 GB MZ7TE128HMGR
14.24 fps ∼40% -21%
bajo medio alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 18.19.6fps
Overwatch (2016) 15.19.7fps

Ruido

Ocioso
/ / dB(A)
Carga
/ dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia)
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABF050
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142
Asus F540SA-XX087T
HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
Noise
off / environment *
31.2
31.2
31.2
31.2
31.6
Idle Minimum *
31.5
33.5
31.7
33.2
34.5
Idle Average *
31.9
33.5
31.7
33.2
34.5
Idle Maximum *
31.9
33.5
31.7
34.6
34.5
Load Average *
34.2
33.5
37.2
45
39
Load Maximum *
36.8
33.5
35.3
45.2
38.3

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.
 34.6 °C35 °C25.2 °C 
 32.8 °C38 °C25.2 °C 
 33.4 °C31.4 °C26.2 °C 
Máximo: 38 °C
Médio: 31.3 °C
25.4 °C31.4 °C37.2 °C
25.4 °C42.8 °C38.7 °C
25.8 °C29.8 °C32.6 °C
Máximo: 42.8 °C
Médio: 32.1 °C
Conector de corriente  30.4 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.938.82536.835.13134.134.44033.836.65033.533.56334.133.98038.837.510035.835.312531.733.11603335.720030.143.225030.355.131530.162.340028.963.250027.462.363025.868.88002569100024.161.312502459.8160024.163.3200023.663.3250023.259.331502359.6400022.969.150002368.5630022.970.6800022.968.41000022.968.1125002368.21600023.965.5SPL36.678.4N2.943.9median 24.1HP 250 G5 Y1V08UTmedian 63.2Delta38.135.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.42 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 21%, worst was 48%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.25 / 0.51 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3.9 / 6.4 / 6.5 Watt
Carga midlight 11.1 / 13.8 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
N3060, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
6200U, HD Graphics 520, Toshiba MQ01ABF050, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
N3540, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6
Asus F540SA-XX087T
N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
5200U, Radeon R5 M330, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
6200U, HD Graphics 520, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
-102%
-28%
-29%
-91%
-44%
Idle Minimum *
3.9
5.8
-49%
4.8
-23%
3.8
3%
4
-3%
3.6
8%
Idle Average *
6.4
12.6
-97%
7.5
-17%
6.9
-8%
6.5
-2%
6
6%
Idle Maximum *
6.5
12.8
-97%
9.2
-42%
7.14
-10%
7
-8%
6.4
2%
Load Average *
11.1
27.6
-149%
16
-44%
20
-80%
36
-224%
26
-134%
Load Maximum *
13.8
30
-117%
15.4
-12%
20.7
-50%
43.6
-216%
28.1
-104%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
11h 56min
Navegando con WLAN v1.3
6h 16min
Carga (máximo brillo)
3h 45min
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
N3060, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), 41 Wh
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 37 Wh
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
N3540, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 24 Wh
Asus F540SA-XX087T
N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), 33 Wh
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
5200U, Radeon R5 M330, 41 Wh
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 41 Wh
Duración de Batería
-16%
-45%
-12%
-22%
-24%
Reader / Idle
716
667
-7%
634
-11%
Load
225
115
-49%
109
-52%
WiFi v1.3
376
315
-16%
207
-45%
329
-12%
342
-9%
347
-8%

Pro

+ sin ralentización CPU; bajas temperaturas
+ gran aguante; bajo consumo
+ batería de Ión-Litio extraíble
+ HDD y RAM mejorables
+ HDMI y VGA
+ económico
+ silencioso

Contra

- las teclas repiquetean; no están iluminadas
- poco espacio de color y poco ángulo de visión
- rendimiento de sistema lento
- tapa susceptible a la flexión
- textura plástica barata
- retroiluminación ténue de display
- mantenibilidad complicada
- sin USB Type-C
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT

Los portátiles mainstream más antiguos suelen emparejar procesadores capaces con HDDs lentos que suelen ser el cuello de botella del rendimiento de sistema. Nuestra configuración del Celeron N3060 HP es lo mismo pero al revés ya que empareja un procesador muy débil con un veloz SSD. El resultado final es el mismo: Rendimiento lento sólo apto para procesado de textos, navegación, reproducción de vídeos, y otras actividades de poca potencia.

Las ventajas incluyen funcionamiento silencioso, precio inicial bajo, y gran aguante. El chasis mismo es del montón y sugerimos enfáticamente invertir en una configuración más potente con un procesador Core ix y una pantalla FHD para los que se planteen el 250 G5. Un rápido calibrado también es recomendable para sacarle todo el jugo al display y, si el precio es una preocupación, el viejo 250 G4 no es muy diferente y hasta rinde más rápido si se le configura bien.

Evita la configuración más baja con el Celeron N3060 y el HP 250 G5 resulta más fácil de recomendar para las tareas básicas.

 

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT - 10/30/2016 v5.1
Allen Ngo

Acabado
73 / 98 → 75%
Teclado
71%
Ratón
75%
Conectividad
46 / 80 → 57%
Peso
63 / 67 → 91%
Battería
88%
Pantalla
70%
Rendimiento de juegos
33 / 68 → 49%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
47 / 92 → 51%
Temperatura
93%
Ruido
100%
Audio
53%
Cámara
50 / 85 → 59%
Impresión
-1%
Médio
62%
76%
Office - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT (Celeron N3060, HD)
Allen Ngo, 2016-11- 3 (Update: 2016-11- 3)