Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ (i5-7200U, 940MX)

El Inacabado. El nuevo ofimático-multimedia de Asus atrae con su diseño elegante y una carcasa particularmente ligera y compacta, pero apenas tiene qué hacer en el área gaming con su GeForce 940MX. A pesar de muchos buenos atributos, no podemos dar una recomendación de compra a este dispositivo, y no sólo por su modesto aguante de batería.
, , , , , ,
buscar relación
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T (Vivobook S15 S510 Serie)
Procesador
Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake
Adaptador gráfico
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX - 2048 MB, Núcleo: 1189 MHz, Memoría: 4000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 377.05, Nvidia Optimus
Memoría
8192 MB 
, DDR4, 2400 MHz, Single-Channel, 1 von 2 Bänken belegt
pantalla
15.60 pulgadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156W02 / AUO B156HAN02.1, IPS, lustroso: no
Placa base
Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Disco duro
Toshiba SG5 THNSNK128GVN8, 128 GB 
, + HDD 1 TB Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 (5400 rpm)
Tarjeta de sonido
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexiones
2 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, Audio Conexiones: Audio in/out kombiniert, 3,5 mm Klinke, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, 1 Lector de Huellas Digitales, Brightness Sensor
Equipamento de red
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 18 x 361 x 244
Battería
42 Wh Litio-Ion, 3 Zellen
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: VGA
Características adicionales
Altavoces: stereo, unten, Teclado: Chiclet, Luz de Teclado: si, 24 Meses Garantía
Peso
1.7 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 219 g
Precio
950 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ

Size Comparison

379 mm 261 mm 25.4 mm 2.3 kg378 mm 252.2 mm 24.1 mm 2.4 kg370.5 mm 255 mm 18.9 mm 2.1 kg361 mm 244 mm 18 mm 1.7 kg
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81.27 MB/s ∼100% +140%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
62.5 MB/s ∼77% +84%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
33.9 MB/s ∼42%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23.3 MB/s ∼29% -31%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86.39 MB/s ∼100% +131%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81.71 MB/s ∼95% +118%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
37.4 MB/s ∼43%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
24.9 MB/s ∼29% -33%
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
668 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
649 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
465 MBit/s ∼70% -30%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
434 MBit/s ∼65% -35%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
645 MBit/s ∼100% +26%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
529 MBit/s ∼82% +4%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
510 MBit/s ∼79%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
495 MBit/s ∼77% -3%
278
cd/m²
265
cd/m²
276
cd/m²
284
cd/m²
293
cd/m²
293
cd/m²
260
cd/m²
253
cd/m²
274
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
AU Optronics B156W02 / AUO B156HAN02.1
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 293 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 275.1 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
iluminación: 86 %
Brillo con batería: 293 cd/m²
Contraste: 1172:1 (Negro: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.81 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 2.66 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
58% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.23% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.47% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.94% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.54
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
AU Optronics B156W02 / AUO B156HAN02.1, , 1920x1080, 15.60
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
BOE0700 / BOE CQ NV156FHM-N48, , 1920x1080, 15.60
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
AUO B156HAN04.4, , 1920x1080, 15.60
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
ID: AU Optronics AUO41ED, , 1920x1080, 15.60
Display
-0%
-1%
-0%
Display P3 Coverage
38.94
39.02
0%
38.65
-1%
38.81
0%
sRGB Coverage
58.47
57.7
-1%
57.96
-1%
57.86
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
40.23
40.31
0%
39.94
-1%
40.03
0%
Response Times
-2%
7%
9%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
47 ?(21, 26)
42 ?(22, 20)
11%
44.8 ?(16.4, 28.4)
5%
38.8 ?(20, 18.8)
17%
Response Time Black / White *
28 ?(16, 12)
32 ?(18, 14)
-14%
25.6 ?(6.8, 18.8)
9%
28 ?(16.4, 11.6)
-0%
PWM Frequency
1087 ?(90)
Screen
-10%
-15%
-23%
Brightness middle
293
248
-15%
242
-17%
256.6
-12%
Brightness
275
239
-13%
243
-12%
243
-12%
Brightness Distribution
86
69
-20%
75
-13%
81
-6%
Black Level *
0.25
0.18
28%
0.24
4%
0.19
24%
Contrast
1172
1378
18%
1008
-14%
1351
15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.81
4.85
-27%
4.65
-22%
5
-31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.64
8.34
-26%
9.64
-45%
20.1
-203%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.66
3.84
-44%
3.39
-27%
2.7
-2%
Gamma
2.54 87%
2.29 96%
2.7 81%
2.32 95%
CCT
6541 99%
6790 96%
6246 104%
6599 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
37
37
0%
36.69
-1%
36.7
-1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
58
57
-2%
57.66
-1%
57.7
-1%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
-4% / -7%
-3% / -9%
-5% / -14%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
28 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 16 ms subida
↘ 12 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 61 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (23.7 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
47 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 21 ms subida
↘ 26 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 75 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (37.5 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 52 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 20897 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 3846000) Hz.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
151 Points ∼100% +16%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5
Intel Core i5-8250U
145 Points ∼96% +12%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
Intel Core i5-7200U
130 Points ∼86%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points ∼85% -1%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
Intel Core i5-7200U
128 Points ∼85% -2%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
740 Points ∼100% +124%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5
Intel Core i5-8250U
560 Points ∼76% +69%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
Intel Core i5-7200U
331 Points ∼45%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Intel Core i5-7200U
330 Points ∼45% 0%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
Intel Core i5-7200U
326 Points ∼44% -2%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
331 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
130 Points
ayuda
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
4042 Points ∼100% +17%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
GeForce MX150, i5-7200U, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH
3719 Points ∼92% +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK
3550 Points ∼88% +2%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U, Toshiba SG5 THNSNK128GVN8
3468 Points ∼86%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
4964 Points ∼100% +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK
4666 Points ∼94% +4%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
GeForce MX150, i5-7200U, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH
4577 Points ∼92% +2%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U, Toshiba SG5 THNSNK128GVN8
4483 Points ∼90%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3468 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4483 puntos
ayuda
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
Toshiba SG5 THNSNK128GVN8
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
46%
139%
4%
Read Seq
437.6
462.2
6%
1140
161%
491.6
12%
Write Seq
138.6
409.9
196%
468.1
238%
141.7
2%
Read 512
368.6
310.3
-16%
759
106%
345.6
-6%
Write 512
138.2
216.6
57%
414
200%
142.6
3%
Read 4k
16.05
31.89
99%
34.3
114%
18.83
17%
Write 4k
86.19
73.22
-15%
123.4
43%
76.3
-11%
Read 4k QD32
279.1
287.9
3%
529.5
90%
348.5
25%
Write 4k QD32
121.8
170.6
40%
319.2
162%
104.8
-14%
Toshiba SG5 THNSNK128GVN8
Sequential Read: 437.6 MB/s
Sequential Write: 138.6 MB/s
512K Read: 368.6 MB/s
512K Write: 138.2 MB/s
4K Read: 16.05 MB/s
4K Write: 86.19 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 279.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 121.8 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7537 Points ∼100% +180%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-7200U
4547 Points ∼60% +69%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
4243 Points ∼56% +58%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U
2689 Points ∼36%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ
38082 Points ∼100% +218%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
21835 Points ∼57% +82%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-7200U
21160 Points ∼56% +77%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U
11986 Points ∼31%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ
6002 Points ∼100% +178%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-7200U
3603 Points ∼60% +67%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
3545 Points ∼59% +64%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U
2158 Points ∼36%
3DMark 11 Performance
2843 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
7748 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1944 puntos
ayuda
bajo medio alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 41.4 25.4 fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 46.9 26.1 fps
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) 43.8 29.8 fps

Ruido

Ocioso
31.2 / 31.2 / 31.2 dB(A)
HDD
31.6 dB(A)
Carga
43.3 / 43.3 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 30.6 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.935.63435.532.9253434.335.438.6343138.238.839.348.238.24031.933.734.535.631.95038.640.138.83438.66333.33130.332.233.38028.231.726.428.228.210028.728.626.42728.712526.627.524.724.326.616025.7272423.225.720025.625.822.722.825.625026.626.72222.326.631528.729.321.221.528.740026.126.520.320.226.150027.627.819.619.227.663026.627.519.418.926.68002929.720.318.429100030.8311917.930.8125030.530.618.31830.5160032.633.518.617.632.6200034.534.519.717.534.5250034.234.518.217.934.2315032.132.518.41832.1400030.630.918.518.230.6500029.329.818.718.529.363002828.318.618.628800025.52618.818.825.51000021.321.418.918.721.31250020.320.518.918.920.31600019.519.419.119.119.5SPL4343.331.230.743N4.14.31.51.54.1median 28median 28.3median 19.1median 18.8median 28Delta2.521.31.82.531.934.93335.531.933.636.735.838.633.642.745.349.748.242.733.834.439.235.633.829.934.933.93429.928.729.830.732.228.727.329.130.628.227.326.430.527.12726.424.826.526.524.324.824.724.124.723.224.724.324.123.222.824.322.922.722.722.322.92323.620.821.52322.622.720.420.222.622.322.119.819.222.322.8231918.922.827.628.31918.427.625.426.61817.925.426.327.4181826.324.325.217.917.624.324.625.51817.524.624.125.21817.924.125.92718.21825.921.422.418.418.221.421.822.918.518.521.820.22118.518.620.219.319.718.818.819.31919.318.918.71919.119.51918.919.119.52019.319.119.53636.930.930.7362.42.61.51.52.4median 23median 23.6median 19median 18.8median 231.71.91.61.81.7hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189TAcer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
Carga Máx.
 30.5 °C38.2 °C37.4 °C 
 23.7 °C29.4 °C36.6 °C 
 23 °C23.8 °C26 °C 
Máximo: 38.2 °C
Médio: 29.8 °C
36.4 °C49 °C33.3 °C
35.6 °C35 °C26.1 °C
26 °C24.2 °C23.6 °C
Máximo: 49 °C
Médio: 32.1 °C
Conector de corriente  47.5 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21.3 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 31 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 39 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.9 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26 °C / 78.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+2.9 °C / 5.2 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.635.532.6253538.6353136.848.236.8403435.6345038.83438.86328.832.228.88030.728.230.710034.72734.712540.924.340.916041.923.241.920046.122.846.125057.422.357.43156121.56140063.420.263.45006619.26663066.618.966.680065.418.465.4100063.617.963.6125067.21867.2160069.417.669.4200071.217.571.2250073.417.973.4315069.41869.4400069.318.269.3500068.318.568.3630069.818.669.8800069.518.869.5100006818.7681250061.918.961.91600054.719.154.7SPL81.230.781.2N50.91.550.9median 66median 18.8median 66Delta7.31.87.336.535.536.533.738.633.737.648.237.633.735.633.732.13432.129.432.229.427.528.227.526.12726.128.424.328.440.523.240.544.722.844.756.922.356.959.121.559.162.320.262.364.519.264.572.518.972.57618.47674.317.974.373.31873.373.217.673.274.517.574.575.717.975.776.41876.477.518.277.574.318.574.370.318.670.358.618.858.662.818.762.873.518.973.570.419.170.486.130.786.165.61.565.6median 70.4median 18.8median 70.49.51.89.530.331.130.331.73133.229.23029.131.328.429.534.133.538.236.831.333.625.539.726.354.825.266.926.670.824.368.222.764.319.461.119.656.518.657.518.764.518.570.918.27618.37118.566.920.96520.364.819.563.619.764.219.756.820.554.219.652.332.480.71.945.7median 19.7median 64.23.25.838.94036.33736.736.334.835.334.936.336.43333.532.631.831.430.130.230.533.729.643.828.850.828.154.127.355.82857.228.359.725.861.925.763.925.366.425.668.524.459.824.867.124.261.324.259.524.262.724.161.223.958.323.854.123.853.123.949.437.475.5334.6median 25.6median 58.326.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189TAcer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68.52 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.4 / 0.5 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3.6 / 6.8 / 9.5 Watt
Carga midlight 51.6 / 56 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, Toshiba SG5 THNSNK128GVN8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE
i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, SK Hynix HFS256G3BTND, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.60
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
i5-7200U, GeForce MX150, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.60
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Power Consumption
21%
1%
6%
-84%
Idle Minimum *
3.6
2.9
19%
3.7
-3%
2.8
22%
9.4
-161%
Idle Average *
6.8
5.9
13%
6.2
9%
6.3
7%
9.7
-43%
Idle Maximum *
9.5
7.3
23%
8.4
12%
6.9
27%
16.8
-77%
Load Average *
51.6
39.5
23%
50
3%
51.6
-0%
76.5
-48%
Load Maximum *
56
42
25%
65.2
-16%
69.7
-24%
105.6
-89%
Witcher 3 ultra *
86.5

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
7h 03min
WiFi Websurfing
4h 15min
Carga (máximo brillo)
1h 11min
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, 42 Wh
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
i5-7200U, GeForce MX150, 49 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 41 Wh
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 70 Wh
Duración de Batería
108%
91%
91%
Reader / Idle
423
916
117%
883
109%
971
130%
WiFi v1.3
255
509
100%
462
81%
481
89%
Load
71
146
106%
129
82%
110
55%

Pro

+ muchas versiones para elegir
+ ligero, compacto, delgado
+ diseño premium
+ manufactura impecable
+ con características de seguridad
+ buen touchpad
+ contarste buenísimo
+ SSD subpar
+ quedo
+ sistema de sonido decente
+ con software de ahorro de batería

Contra

- estabilidad de carcasa mejorable
- 2x USB 2.0
- puertos en posición poco ideal
- lector SD lento
- teclas esponjosas
- brillo de display mejorable
- insuficiente cobertura de espacio de color
- mala webcam
- aguante de batería demasiado escaso
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T - cortesía de notebooksbilliger.de
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T - cortesía de notebooksbilliger.de

Lo sentimos Asus, pero tu estiloso VivoBook S15 S510UQ es un fallo hasta cierto punto. El modelo de pruebas se vende por casi 1000 Euros en el mercado, y eso no pega ni con la mediocre carcasa de la estabilidad ni con un teclado que es meramente aceptable. ¿Y de qué valen TPM, un lector de huellas, un tamaño compacto y peso reducido, si la batería se agota tras apenas cuatro horas?¿Cómo puede beneficiarse el procesado de imagen del buen contraste y los colores adecuados si ni siquiera se cubre rudimentariamente el espacio de color sRGB. ¿Por qué usa Asus una gráfica que no mejora mucho las cosas en vez de decidirse por la mucho más rápida GeForce MX150? ¿Dónde encontraron los taiwaneses el SSD de tempo tan anticuado?¿Cómo encajan con el precio 2 puertos USB 2.0, el lector de tarjetas lentísimo, y la malísima  webcam?

A nuestro parecer, Asus se ha convertido en víctima de su propia estrategia de modelos. Las variantes de la serie empiezan en precios en los que podríamos tolerar tales medidas de ahorro, pero por unos 1000 Euros esperamos más. Quién esté buscando un portátil multimedia compacto de 15" para el camino quedará mucho mejor servido con el Acer Swift 3 SF315 en una de sus muchas variantes que testamos recientemente. 

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T - 10/17/2017 v6(old)
Sven Kloevekorn

Acabado
77 / 98 → 79%
Teclado
72%
Ratón
84%
Conectividad
49 / 81 → 61%
Peso
67 / 20-67 → 99%
Battería
80%
Pantalla
88%
Rendimiento de juegos
68 / 85 → 80%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
83 / 92 → 90%
Temperatura
93%
Ruido
84 / 95 → 88%
Audio
73%
Cámara
29 / 85 → 34%
Médio
73%
81%
Multimedia - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ (i5-7200U, 940MX)
Sven Kloevekorn, 2017-10-20 (Update: 2017-10-20)