Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del portátil Acer Swift 3 SF315 (i5-7200U, GeForce MX150)

Sven Kloevekorn (traducido por Francisco García), 10/09/2017

Un poco de todo. El nuevo Acer consigue punto por su compacidad, versatilidad, y la nueva GeForce MX150. Los pequeños problemas con la pantalla y el sonido no encajan bien con sus ambiciones multimedia, pero gracias a los buenos dispositivos de entrada, características de seguridad y la excelente resistencia, ofrece una mayor movilidad para la oficina.

Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 (Swift 3 Serie)
Procesador
Intel Core i5-7200U
Adaptador gráfico
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (Laptop GT 1030) - 2048 MB, Núcleo: 1469 - 1532 MHz, Memoría: 6000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 381.99, Nvidia Optimus
Memoría
8192 MB 
, DDR4, 2133 MHz, doble canal
pantalla
15.6 pulgadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixels 141 PPI, BOE0700 / BOE CQ NV156FHM-N48, IPS, lustroso: si
Placa base
Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Disco duro
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH, 128 GB 
, +HDD Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 (1 TB, 5400 rpm), 1024 GB libre
Tarjeta de sonido
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, 1 Lector de Huellas Digitales, Brightness Sensor
Equipamento de red
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n/ac)
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 18.9 x 370.5 x 255
Battería
49 Wh, 3220 mAh Litio-Ion, 4 celdas
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionales
Altavoces: estéreo, Teclado: chiclet, Luz de Teclado: si, 24 Meses Garantía
Peso
2.1 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 204 g
Precio
999 EUR

 

Größenvergleich

Left side: power, HDMI, USB 3.1 Gen1 Type C, audio in/out
Left side: power, HDMI, USB 3.1 Gen1 Type C, audio in/out
Right side: SD card reader, USB 2.0, Kensington
Right side: SD card reader, USB 2.0, Kensington
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
83.8 MB/s ∼100% +260%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
62.5 MB/s ∼75% +168%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23.3 MB/s ∼28%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
23.2 MB/s ∼28% 0%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87.9 MB/s ∼100% +253%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81.71 MB/s ∼93% +228%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
27.6 MB/s ∼31% +11%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
24.9 MB/s ∼28%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
533 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
529 MBit/s ∼99%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
521 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
495 MBit/s ∼93% -6%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
666 MBit/s ∼100% +3%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
653 MBit/s ∼98% +1%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
649 MBit/s ∼97%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
434 MBit/s ∼65% -33%
258
cd/m²
262
cd/m²
274
cd/m²
234
cd/m²
248
cd/m²
247
cd/m²
190
cd/m²
215
cd/m²
227
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 274 cd/m² Médio: 239.4 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²
iluminación: 69 %
Brillo con batería: 252 cd/m²
Contraste: 1378:1 (Negro: 0.18 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.85 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.84 | - Ø
57% sRGB (Argyll) 37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.29
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
BOE0700 / BOE CQ NV156FHM-N48, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
BOE, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
LG Philips LGD0550 / LP156WF6-SPK4, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
AUO B156HAN04.4, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
32%
38%
7%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
42 (22, 20)
43 (24, 19, plateau)
-2%
22 (10, 12)
48%
44.8 (16.4, 28.4)
-7%
Response Time Black / White *
32 (18, 14)
11 (7, 4)
66%
23 (13, 10)
28%
25.6 (6.8, 18.8)
20%
PWM Frequency
1087 (90)
Screen
-19%
-13%
-4%
Brightness
239
215
-10%
257
8%
243
2%
Brightness Distribution
69
91
32%
85
23%
75
9%
Black Level *
0.18
0.46
-156%
0.32
-78%
0.24
-33%
Contrast
1378
489
-65%
878
-36%
1008
-27%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.85
3.94
19%
5.16
-6%
4.65
4%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.84
2.68
30%
4.57
-19%
3.39
12%
Gamma
2.29 105%
2.35 102%
2.59 93%
2.7 89%
CCT
6790 96%
6709 97%
6931 94%
6246 104%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
37
36
-3%
37
0%
36.69
-1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
57
57
0%
58
2%
57.66
1%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
7% / -9%
13% / -3%
2% / -2%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
32 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 18 ms subida
↘ 14 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 81 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (26.6 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
42 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 22 ms subida
↘ 20 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 52 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (42.7 ms).

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado 1087 Hz90 % de brillo

La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 1087 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 90 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM.

La frecuencia de 1087 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual.

Comparación: 56 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 7499 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
151 Points ∼100% +18%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
146 Points ∼97% +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points ∼85% +1%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
Intel Core i5-7200U
128 Points ∼85%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
733 Points ∼100% +125%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
719 Points ∼98% +121%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Intel Core i5-7200U
330 Points ∼45% +1%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
Intel Core i5-7200U
326 Points ∼44%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
326 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
128 Points
ayuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
5040 Points ∼100% +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK
4666 Points ∼93% +2%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
GeForce MX150, 7200U, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH
4577 Points ∼91%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
4442 Points ∼88% -3%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
3832 Points ∼100% +3%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
GeForce MX150, 7200U, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH
3719 Points ∼97%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
3565 Points ∼93% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK
3550 Points ∼93% -5%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3719 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4577 puntos
ayuda
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
Hynix HFS128G39TND
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-11%
-91%
81%
Write 4k QD32
170.6
136.4
-20%
0.893
-99%
319.2
87%
Read 4k QD32
287.9
348.2
21%
0.718
-100%
529.5
84%
Write 4k
73.22
76.76
5%
0.846
-99%
123.4
69%
Read 4k
31.89
29.74
-7%
0.327
-99%
34.3
8%
Write 512
216.6
136.9
-37%
28.31
-87%
414
91%
Read 512
310.3
340.9
10%
28.33
-91%
759
145%
Write Seq
409.9
136.2
-67%
100.6
-75%
468.1
14%
Read Seq
462.2
503.7
9%
101.5
-78%
1140
147%
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH
Sequential Read: 462.2 MB/s
Sequential Write: 409.9 MB/s
512K Read: 310.3 MB/s
512K Write: 216.6 MB/s
4K Read: 31.89 MB/s
4K Write: 73.22 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 287.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 170.6 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
9768 Points ∼100% +115%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7664 Points ∼78% +69%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (Laptop GT 1030), Intel Core i5-7200U
4547 Points ∼47%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
4243 Points ∼43% -7%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7791 Points ∼100% +116%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
6094 Points ∼78% +69%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (Laptop GT 1030), Intel Core i5-7200U
3603 Points ∼46%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
3545 Points ∼46% -2%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
46362 Points ∼100% +119%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
37469 Points ∼81% +77%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
21835 Points ∼47% +3%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (Laptop GT 1030), Intel Core i5-7200U
21160 Points ∼46%
3DMark 11 Performance
4507 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
9757 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3104 puntos
ayuda
bajo medio alto ultra
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 42.321.8fps
Rocket League (2017) 68.843.2fps
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) 71.427.2fps

Ruido

Ocioso
30.6 / 30.6 / 30.6 dB(A)
Carga
36.9 / 36 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 30.6 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.934.93335.531.92533.636.735.838.633.63142.745.349.748.242.74033.834.439.235.633.85029.934.933.93429.96328.729.830.732.228.78027.329.130.628.227.310026.430.527.12726.412524.826.526.524.324.816024.724.124.723.224.720024.324.123.222.824.325022.922.722.722.322.93152323.620.821.52340022.622.720.420.222.650022.322.119.819.222.363022.8231918.922.880027.628.31918.427.6100025.426.61817.925.4125026.327.4181826.3160024.325.217.917.624.3200024.625.51817.524.6250024.125.21817.924.1315025.92718.21825.9400021.422.418.418.221.4500021.822.918.518.521.8630020.22118.518.620.2800019.319.718.818.819.3100001919.318.918.7191250019.119.51918.919.11600019.52019.319.119.5SPL3636.930.930.736N2.42.61.51.52.4median 23Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9median 23.6median 19median 18.8median 23Delta1.71.91.61.81.748.34242.435.148.341.340.53933.841.336.539.233.830.636.533.832.933.728.633.833.432.131.428.633.433.634.93130.633.632.631.932.327.232.632.93428.726.532.929.929.426.42629.930.730.427.225.130.728.527.926.323.928.528.928.425.122.228.9302825.622.33029.9282621.429.930.928.223.120.430.931.428.822.419.631.434.931.92318.734.93632.722.418.23633.531.120.71833.537.735.220.117.937.740.33719.617.540.337.933.719.117.237.93531.719.217.23530.726.1191730.728.42419.117.228.42621.91917.12623.220.618.917.123.2212018.917.12120.119.618.816.920.120.119.61916.920.146.943.732.930.346.95.24.11.91.45.2median 30.7Asus FX553VD-DM249Tmedian 28.4median 20.7median 18median 30.73.53.932.83.53532.932.231.43529.930.632.632.529.933.730.13836.333.728.529.529.128.928.53230.929.3313227.438.127.829.427.431.931.632.425.531.932.832.233.524.932.824.825.824.525.124.824.125.223.823.224.124.52422.722.924.523.624.92221.423.624.426.621.421.124.425.428.420.32025.422.124.919.919.222.122.624.819.518.622.627.328.82218.327.326.428.720.918.126.426.329.618.317.626.327.932.519.417.627.9273318.217.82725.63218.617.925.624.330.318.217.824.322.327.518.318.122.321.727.218.318.321.719.523.818.518.419.518.820.518.518.518.81919.518.518.61918.718.718.418.418.719.718.618.418.419.736.841.331.430.436.82.53.61.61.42.5median 24.3Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15median 26.6median 19.4median 18.4median 24.32.32.72.51.82.3hearing rangehide median Fan Noise
Carga Máx.
 36 °C42.6 °C39.6 °C 
 33.1 °C39.2 °C30.1 °C 
 25.5 °C34.9 °C25.6 °C 
Máximo: 42.6 °C
Médio: 34.1 °C
29.6 °C37.2 °C33.3 °C
27.7 °C32.8 °C29.4 °C
25.5 °C26.6 °C26.8 °C
Máximo: 37.2 °C
Médio: 29.9 °C
Conector de corriente  40.6 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 20.5 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.535.536.52533.738.633.73137.648.237.64033.735.633.75032.13432.16329.432.229.48027.528.227.510026.12726.112528.424.328.416040.523.240.520044.722.844.725056.922.356.931559.121.559.140062.320.262.350064.519.264.563072.518.972.58007618.476100074.317.974.3125073.31873.3160073.217.673.2200074.517.574.5250075.717.975.7315076.41876.4400077.518.277.5500074.318.574.3630070.318.670.3800058.618.858.61000062.818.762.81250073.518.973.51600070.419.170.4SPL86.130.786.1N65.61.565.6median 70.4Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9median 18.8median 70.4Delta9.51.89.53531.43534.332.534.335.936.335.930.628.930.631.53131.528.529.428.533.325.533.336.224.936.243.525.143.551.723.251.752.922.952.958.321.458.36421.16466.12066.163.919.263.965.918.665.971.318.371.365.218.165.264.817.664.868.417.668.469.217.869.268.617.968.667.717.867.770.718.170.772.618.372.672.218.472.272.418.572.472.718.672.767.818.467.858.518.458.581.730.481.754.41.454.4median 66.1Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15median 18.4median 66.15.51.85.530.331.130.331.73133.229.23029.131.328.429.534.133.538.236.831.333.625.539.726.354.825.266.926.670.824.368.222.764.319.461.119.656.518.657.518.764.518.570.918.27618.37118.566.920.96520.364.819.563.619.764.219.756.820.554.219.652.332.480.71.945.7median 19.7Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000median 64.23.25.8hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 17%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 17%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 17%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.37 / 0.5 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3.7 / 6.2 / 8.4 Watt
Carga midlight 50 / 65.2 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
7200U, GeForce MX150, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Hynix HFS128G39TND, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Toshiba MQ01ABD100, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
-31%
-74%
6%
Idle Minimum *
3.7
4
-8%
7
-89%
2.8
24%
Idle Average *
6.2
6.7
-8%
10.2
-65%
6.3
-2%
Idle Maximum *
8.4
9.6
-14%
14
-67%
6.9
18%
Load Average *
50
81
-62%
78
-56%
51.6
-3%
Load Maximum *
65.2
107
-64%
127
-95%
69.7
-7%
Witcher 3 ultra *
90

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
15h 16min
Navegando con WLAN v1.3
8h 29min
Carga (máximo brillo)
2h 26min
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
7200U, GeForce MX150, 49 Wh
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 48 Wh
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 52.5 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 41 Wh
Duración de Batería
-42%
-50%
-8%
Reader / Idle
916
587
-36%
322
-65%
883
-4%
WiFi v1.3
509
360
-29%
302
-41%
462
-9%
Load
146
56
-62%
81
-45%
129
-12%

Pro

+ varias opciones de equipo disponibles
+ delgado, ligero y compacto
+ ejecución impecable
+ buen posicionamiento de los puertos
+ TPM 2.0, lector de huellas
+ Clickpad muy agradable
+ muy buena relación de contraste
+ silencioso, fresco y económico

Contra

- muy sensible a las huellas dactilares
- difícil de limpiar
- sin Thunderbolt 3
- lector de tarjetas muy lento
- el mantenimiento puede ser difícil
- el teclado numérico es demasiado pequeño
- pantalla demasiado oscura
- medimos muy mala distribución del brillo
- insuficiente cobertura del espacio de color
- tiempo de reacción de visualización lenta
- sonido insatisfactorio
El Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 - Modelo de pruebas cortesía de notebooksbilliger.de
El Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 - Modelo de pruebas cortesía de notebooksbilliger.de

Si consideras el alto precio actual alrededor de 950 euros del nuevo Acer Aspire Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9, sólo la pantalla sub-óptima - que no es terrible - y en particular el sonido bastante malo del recién llegado están por debajo del precio. Visualmente, todo sería genial, si no fuera por esas huellas dactilares molestas y difíciles de limpiar. Pero tal vez el dispositivo se ve bien de nuevo después de haberlo tocado por todas partes.

Si ignoramos las superficies, la carcasa consigue puntos con las dimensiones relativamente pequeñas y un peso limitado, diferenciándose así de una buena parte de la competencia. No hay nada quejarse de la mano de obra. Gracias a los buenos dispositivos de entrada, TPM, lector de huellas, y una resistencia decente, el ligero, compacto, silencioso y fresco Swift 3 es muy adecuado para el uso de un portátil de oficina. Y no menos importante con la nueva Nvidia GeForce MX150, finalmente hay un sucesor utilizable de la vieja tarjeta de 940MX sobrante a bordo, por lo que el juego casual es posible con imágenes buenas o al menos aceptables.

 

Con el nuevo Swift 3, Acer trae un conjunto multiuso exitoso con ambiciones de juego al mercado, que seguramente encontrará algunos compradores con la combinación de una carcasa compacta y ligera y características de seguridad, aunque no se libra de las debilidades.

 Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí

Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 - 10/04/2017 v6
Sven Kloevekorn

Acabado
74 / 98 → 76%
Teclado
80%
Ratón
94%
Conectividad
48 / 81 → 59%
Peso
62 / 67 → 90%
Battería
91%
Pantalla
80%
Rendimiento de juegos
76 / 85 → 89%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
87 / 92 → 95%
Temperatura
93%
Ruido
95 / 95 → 100%
Audio
50%
Cámara
43 / 85 → 51%
Médio
75%
84%
Multimedia - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del portátil Acer Swift 3 SF315 (i5-7200U, GeForce MX150)
Sven Kloevekorn, 2017-10- 9 (Update: 2017-10- 9)