Notebookcheck Logo

Breve análisis del convertible Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T

¿Un serio competidor para la Surface? Los convertibles de alto rendimiento tienen muy buena aceptación. Asus encapsula un procesador Skylake i7 en una carcasa delgada y confía en acertar, pero hay algunos problemas. En nuestro análisis discutiremos si el Transformer Pro 3 tiene sitio en el competitivo mercado de convertibles.
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T (Transformer Pad Serie)
Procesador
Intel Core i7-6500U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Skylake
Adaptador gráfico
Intel HD Graphics 520 - shared Memory MB VRAM, Núcleo: 933 MHz, Memoría: 933 MHz, 21.20.16.4534
Memoría
16 GB 
, LPDDR3 1866MHz SDRAM en placa
pantalla
12.60 pulgadas 16:9, 2880 x 1920 pixels 275 PPI, Multitactil, native pen support, BOE BOE06AC (NV126A1M-N51), IPS, 60Hz, 85% NTSC, Soporte para tecnología ASUS Splendid, lustroso: si, detachable screen
Placa base
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Disco duro
SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND), 512 GB 
, 512GB SSD (SATA, M.2), 421 GB libre
Tarjeta de sonido
Realtek High Definition Audio
Conexiones
1 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, Audio Conexiones: combo 3.5 mm, Card Reader: Multi-formato, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerómetro, TPM
Equipamento de red
Intel Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1, GPS
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 8.35 x 298.8 x 210.1
Battería
39 Wh Litio-Polimero, Duración de la Batería (según el fabricante): 9 h
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix
Características adicionales
Altavoces: Altavoces estereo de 2W, Teclado: Chiclet, Luz de Teclado: si, Adaptador de corriente, teclado, Stylus Asus Pen Active, 24 Meses Garantía, Teclado: 340g,  Stylus ASUS Pen Active: 22g
Peso
1.13 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 200 g
Precio
1599 Euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

333 mm 229 mm 16 mm 1.3 kg300 mm 213.5 mm 8.05 mm 1.2 kg298.8 mm 210.1 mm 8.35 mm 1.1 kg291 mm 201 mm 11 mm 1.3 kg292.1 mm 201.4 mm 8.4 mm 1.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Networking
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Broadcom BCM15700A2 802.11ac
950 MBit/s +70%
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
676 MBit/s +21%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
654 MBit/s +17%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
Intel Wireless-AC 7265
560 MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Broadcom BCM15700A2 802.11ac
949 MBit/s +39%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
Intel Wireless-AC 7265
685 MBit/s
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
680 MBit/s -1%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
660 MBit/s -4%
301
cd/m²
317
cd/m²
316
cd/m²
314
cd/m²
316
cd/m²
317
cd/m²
293
cd/m²
300
cd/m²
289
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
BOE BOE06AC (NV126A1M-N51) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 317 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 307 cd/m² Minimum: 17.5 cd/m²
iluminación: 91 %
Brillo con batería: 316 cd/m²
Contraste: 1090:1 (Negro: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.91 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 5.37 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
72% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
82.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
81.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
BOE BOE06AC (NV126A1M-N51), , 2880x1920, 12.60
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Samsung SDC3853, , 2736x1824, 12.30
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00
Samsung ATNA40JU01-0, , 2560x1440, 14.00
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
LG Philips, , 1920x1280, 12.10
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Panasonic VVX12T041N00, , 2160x1440, 12.00
Display
-12%
-31%
-14%
Display P3 Coverage
81.8
67.5
-17%
53.8
-34%
65.5
-20%
sRGB Coverage
98.3
96.6
-2%
73.7
-25%
96.1
-2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
82.2
69
-16%
53.8
-35%
66.9
-19%
Response Times
-45%
71%
5%
139%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
30 ?(14, 16)
46 ?(17.2, 28.8)
-53%
1 ?(0.5, 0.5)
97%
33.2 ?(15.2, 18)
-11%
20 ?(5, 15, detail 5 schraffiert)
33%
Response Time Black / White *
29 ?(8, 21)
31 ?(6, 25.2)
-7%
1 ?(0.5, 0.5)
97%
22.8 ?(10.4, 12.4)
21%
34 ?(15, 19, PWM@100% mit/ohne PSU)
-17%
PWM Frequency
200 ?(90)
50 ?(50)
-75%
240 ?(100)
20%
1000 ?(100)
400%
Screen
13%
-3%
-22%
-21%
Brightness middle
316
389.2
23%
279
-12%
322
2%
345
9%
Brightness
307
392
28%
277
-10%
319
4%
328
7%
Brightness Distribution
91
92
1%
91
0%
97
7%
91
0%
Black Level *
0.29
0.27
7%
0.42
-45%
0.38
-31%
Contrast
1090
1441
32%
767
-30%
908
-17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.91
3.61
8%
5.15
-32%
6.02
-54%
8.4
-115%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.9
8.28
-5%
10.06
-27%
11.9
-51%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.37
3.8
29%
5.44
-1%
6.29
-17%
4.3
20%
Gamma
2.36 93%
2.16 102%
2.28 96%
2.4 92%
2.63 84%
CCT
7812 83%
5969 109%
5686 114%
7712 84%
7368 88%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
72
63
-12%
98
36%
47.8
-34%
62
-14%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
98
97
-1%
100
2%
73.2
-25%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
-15% / -4%
34% / 17%
-16% / -20%
35% / 12%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
29 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 8 ms subida
↘ 21 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 73 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21.6 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
30 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 14 ms subida
↘ 16 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 33 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (33.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado 200 Hz ≤ 90 % de brillo

La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 200 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 90 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM.

La frecuencia de 200 Hz es relativamente baja, por lo que la gente sensible debería ver parpadeos y padecer fatiga visual por la pantalla (usado al brillo indicado a continuación).

Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 18110 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 3846000) Hz.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00
Intel Core i7-6600U
135 Points +15%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
Intel Core i7-6500U
117 Points
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel Core i5-6200U
114 Points -3%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel Core m5-6Y54
111 Points -5%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
88 Points -25%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00
Intel Core i7-6600U
305 Points +38%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel Core i5-6200U
289 Points +31%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel Core m5-6Y54
255 Points +15%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
Intel Core i7-6500U
221 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
206 Points -7%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00
Intel Core i7-6600U
1.51 Points +17%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
Intel Core i7-6500U
1.29 Points
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel Core m5-6Y54
1.26 Points -2%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
0.98 Points -24%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00
Intel Core i7-6600U
3.32 Points +36%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel Core m5-6Y54
2.7 Points +11%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
Intel Core i7-6500U
2.44 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
2.27 Points -7%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
Intel Core i7-6500U
7220 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
4297 Points -40%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
Intel Core i7-6500U
9374 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
8886 Points -5%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
Intel Core i7-6500U
196.2 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00
Intel Core i7-6600U
187.7 Points -4%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel Core m5-6Y54
184.4 Points -6%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel Core i5-6200U
133.3 Points -32%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00
Intel Core i7-6600U
30759 Points +11%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
Intel Core i7-6500U
27663 Points
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel Core m5-6Y54
26727 Points -3%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel Core i5-6200U
23339 Points -16%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
1556 ms * -23%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel Core i5-6200U
1445 ms * -15%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel Core m5-6Y54
1306 ms * -4%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
Intel Core i7-6500U
1260 ms *
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00
Intel Core i7-6600U
1202 ms * +5%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
4559
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
7308
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
7350
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
5842 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
9374 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
7220 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
2.44 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
26.53 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.29 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
221 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
117 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.7 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
37.41 fps
ayuda
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00
HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZSLW1T0)
3489 Points +17%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
3281 Points +10%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)
2985 Points
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
2983 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
2426 Points -19%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00
HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZSLW1T0)
4410 Points +15%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
3996 Points +4%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
3932 Points +3%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)
3830 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
3186 Points -17%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)
4043 Points
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
3423 Points -15%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
2968 Points -27%
PCMark 7
Score
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)
5152 Points
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
4808 Points -7%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
4274 Points -17%
Productivity
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
2361 Points +2%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)
2315 Points
PCMark Vantage Result
13886 puntos
PCMark 7 Score
5152 puntos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2985 puntos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4043 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3830 puntos
ayuda
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00
Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZSLW1T0)
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Liteon L8H-256V2G
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-7%
121%
12%
0%
Read Seq
398.9
663
66%
1510
279%
501
26%
518
30%
Write Seq
402
158.2
-61%
1193
197%
297.2
-26%
199.9
-50%
Read 512
303.1
313.1
3%
351.7
16%
374.9
24%
Write 512
320.3
158.2
-51%
295.7
-8%
201
-37%
Read 4k
26.11
30.14
15%
37
42%
28.31
8%
29.3
12%
Write 4k
57.7
68
18%
126
118%
90.3
56%
76.8
33%
Read 4k QD32
245.8
243.7
-1%
404
64%
285
16%
272
11%
Write 4k QD32
253.8
149.2
-41%
319
26%
268.4
6%
197.1
-22%
SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)
Sequential Read: 398.9 MB/s
Sequential Write: 402 MB/s
512K Read: 303.1 MB/s
512K Write: 320.3 MB/s
4K Read: 26.11 MB/s
4K Write: 57.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 245.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 253.8 MB/s
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6600U
7572 Points +23%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
7307 Points +19%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
6597 Points +7%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
6308 Points +3%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
6137 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6600U
931 Points +24%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
810 Points +8%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
797 Points +6%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
753 Points
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
47242 Points +34%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
42046 Points +19%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
35293 Points
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6600U
1458 Points +15%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1428 Points +12%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
1271 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
1206 Points -5%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
1200 Points -6%
1280x720 Performance
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6600U
1614 Points +17%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1585 Points +15%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
1381 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
1344 Points -3%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
1334 Points -3%
3DMark 06 - 1280x1024 Standard Score AA:0x AF:0x
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
7912 Points +6%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
7733 Points +4%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
7464 Points
3DMark 03 Standard
20325 puntos
3DMark 05 Standard
9082 puntos
3DMark 06 Standard Score
7464 puntos
3DMark Vantage P Result
4650 puntos
3DMark 11 Performance
1381 puntos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
35293 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
4401 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
676 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
309 puntos
3DMark Time Spy Score
297 puntos
ayuda
bajo medio alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 45.2 26.9 22.5 6.6
Battlefield 4 (2013) 31.3 23.2 15.9
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 20 11 9
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203838.438.839.3382536.238.740.636.736.23132.433.431.234.132.44032.532.532.831.632.55031.332.933.332.831.36334.632.932.233.834.68030.130.230.930.230.110029.129.729.129.329.11252727.827.425.92716026.327.426.826.426.320026.326.625.926.526.325024.625.224.724.324.631524.825.125.323.724.840022.92525.322.422.950022.225.625.222.322.263021.627.827.521.521.680020.525.825.520.920.5100020.124.724.819.620.1125019.625.525.619.519.6160019.227.627.71919.220001926.226.118.619250018.726.927.318.418.7315018.725.325.318.418.7400018.723.223.318.318.7500018.521.821.618.518.5630018.62020.218.518.6800018.619.519.718.518.61000018.318.918.918.418.31250018.118.318.518.118.11600018.218.318.318.118.2SPL31.937.137.131.831.9N1.72.72.71.71.7median 19.6median 25.3median 25.3median 19.5median 19.6Delta2.42.92.82.62.439.941.141.840.733.534.934.234.231.434.43433.336.335.235.635.533.331.532.733.734.63431.131.329.729.229.828.927.627.427.126.927.526.426.426.724.524.326.225.22423.42524.72422.925.523.323.922.325.823.123.521.52823.722.120.628.320.820.919.523.919.920.819.224.918.919.919.225.118.520.918.226.618.121.31828.31820.617.729.817.619.617.729.917.421.217.627.317.518.417.625.717.617.717.62117.517.817.819.517.517.717.618.217.617.917.817.917.617.917.717.917.517.817.717.817.732.330.738.530.71.81.52.91.5median 20.9median 18.2median 25.7median 18.132.33.32.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050TDell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7
Iris Graphics 540, 6650U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00
HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZSLW1T0)
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Iris Graphics 550, 6267U, Apple SSD AP0256
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
Noise
-0%
4%
4%
1%
off / environment *
30.7
28.9
6%
30.2
2%
30.3
1%
Idle Minimum *
30.7
28.4
7%
28.9
6%
30.2
2%
30.6
-0%
Idle Average *
30.7
28.6
7%
28.9
6%
30.2
2%
30.6
-0%
Idle Maximum *
30.7
28.7
7%
28.9
6%
30.2
2%
32.2
-5%
Load Average *
37
40.8
-10%
35.3
5%
33
11%
32.2
13%
Load Maximum *
37.1
41.4
-12%
38.9
-5%
36.2
2%
38.5
-4%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Ruido

Ocioso
30.7 / 30.7 / 30.7 dB(A)
Carga
37 / 37.1 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 30.7 dB(A)
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00
HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZSLW1T0)
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
Heat
-8%
-12%
1%
-11%
Maximum Upper Side *
34.9
43.6
-25%
45.5
-30%
39
-12%
46.7
-34%
Maximum Bottom *
36.7
45.2
-23%
47.1
-28%
41.2
-12%
51
-39%
Idle Upper Side *
35.8
32.4
9%
31.1
13%
29.5
18%
29.5
18%
Idle Bottom *
32.4
29.6
9%
33.1
-2%
29.8
8%
28.6
12%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.
 32 °C34.9 °C31.4 °C 
 26 °C28.9 °C27.5 °C 
 25 °C28.8 °C26.3 °C 
Máximo: 34.9 °C
Médio: 29 °C
31.4 °C36.7 °C33.9 °C
28.7 °C32.4 °C29.8 °C
26.5 °C26.9 °C25.9 °C
Máximo: 36.7 °C
Médio: 30.2 °C
Conector de corriente  44.1 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.8 °C / 96.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-7.7 °C / -13.8 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.639.339.6253936.7393137.734.137.74036.931.636.95039.132.839.16341.233.841.28040.630.240.610042.929.342.912543.425.943.416046.526.446.520050.426.550.425049.224.349.231558.123.758.140059.522.459.550062.222.362.263058.221.558.280056.120.956.1100060.719.660.7125059.519.559.5160059.71959.7200064.718.664.725006718.467315069.118.469.1400069.718.369.7500072.718.572.7630070.418.570.4800065.618.565.61000066.518.466.51250062.418.162.41600053.518.153.5SPL79.231.879.2N42.51.742.5median 59.7median 19.5median 59.7Delta6.52.66.535.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050TApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.14 / 0.85 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 6.7 / 10.3 / 13.5 Watt
Carga midlight 26 / 28.8 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
6500U, HD Graphics 520, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND), IPS, 2880x1920, 12.60
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00
6600U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZSLW1T0), OLED, 2560x1440, 14.00
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
6Y54, HD Graphics 515, Liteon L8H-256V2G, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.10
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
6200U, HD Graphics 520, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2, IPS, 2160x1440, 12.00
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
6267U, Iris Graphics 550, Apple SSD AP0256, , 2560x1600, 13.30
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, , 3200x1800, 13.30
Power Consumption
-6%
23%
4%
-18%
22%
Idle Minimum *
6.7
4.7
30%
3.7
45%
7.3
-9%
2.1
69%
3.7
45%
Idle Average *
10.3
8.6
17%
6.8
34%
10
3%
7.6
26%
6.1
41%
Idle Maximum *
13.5
12.2
10%
7.6
44%
10.15
25%
8.2
39%
6.5
52%
Load Average *
26
29.7
-14%
22.5
13%
25.2
3%
56.4
-117%
29.5
-13%
Load Maximum *
28.8
50.5
-75%
34.5
-20%
29.3
-2%
59.8
-108%
33
-15%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
7h 06min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge: 38.14393.0.0)
3h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
3h 26min
Carga (máximo brillo)
1h 42min
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
6500U, HD Graphics 520, 39 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 38 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00
6600U, HD Graphics 520, 56 Wh
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 37 Wh
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 37 Wh
Duración de Batería
80%
79%
77%
58%
Reader / Idle
426
791
86%
824
93%
732
72%
640
50%
H.264
206
520
152%
432
110%
468
127%
WiFi v1.3
223
488
119%
315
41%
443
99%
321
44%
Load
102
138
35%
132
29%
130
27%
112
10%

Pro

+ Muy buena fabricación
+ Carcasa robusta con soporte
+ Bonito diseño
+ Pantalla 3K con buenos ángulos de visualización
+ Buena reproducción de color
+ Se incluye teclado y stylus
+ Reconocimiento facial
+ Teclado retroiluminado
+ La pantalla táctil es cómoda de usar

Contra

- La CPU no puede rendir al máximo
- Escasa duración de batería
- No se puede ampliar
- El touchpad es mediocre
- Solo tiene un puerto USB-C 3.1
Análisis: Asus Transformer 3 Pro. Modelo de prueba cedido por Asus Alemania
Análisis: Asus Transformer 3 Pro. Modelo de prueba cedido por Asus Alemania

Asus ha decidido competir cara a cara con el Microsoft Surface. El Asus Transformer 3 Pro es un paso adelante: un procesador más rápido, mucha memoria RAM y un amplio SSD. El teclado transforma la tablet e un portátil. En el momento de hacer la prueba, el precio del convertible era de 1599 Euros. El comprador recibe a cambio un dispositivo fiable con rendimiento suficiente para las tareas cotidianas. Desafortunadamente el modelo de prueba nunca pudo mostrar todo su rendimiento. Ésta es la razón por la que no podemos considerarlo un competidor real del Microsoft Surface Pro 4.  

La diferencia entre el rendimiento potencial y el real puede asustar a muchos compradores. Sin embargo, el Asus Transformer 3 Pro es un convertible bonito con muy buena fabricación. La buena pantalla ofrece una estupenda reproducción de color y es adecuada para su uso profesional.

Un procesador más rápido siempre se agradece. Pero ¿es realmente necesario si el fabricante reduce su rendimiento? Un Intel Core i5-7Y54 puede funcionar con refrigeración pasiva y conseguir el mismo rendimiento que el Intel Core i7-6500U de nuestro modelo de prueba. La conectividad del Asus es típica, pero nos habría gustado que se incluyera un puerto USB 3.1 adicional (y que ambos soportaran Thunderbolt 3) en el futuro para que el usuario pudiera usar uno para cargar y el otro para ampliar la conectividad.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T - 12/21/2016 v6(old)
Sebastian Bade

Acabado
91 / 98 → 93%
Teclado
82%
Ratón
81%
Conectividad
55 / 80 → 69%
Peso
78 / 35-78 → 100%
Battería
72%
Pantalla
87%
Rendimiento de juegos
55 / 68 → 81%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
77 / 87 → 89%
Temperatura
92%
Ruido
91%
Audio
73 / 91 → 80%
Cámara
62 / 85 → 72%
Médio
77%
86%
Convertible - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del convertible Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
Sebastian Bade, 2017-01- 6 (Update: 2017-01- 6)