Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del portátil HP Pavilion 17-x110ng

Sebastian Bade (traducido por Fernando Alvarez Ude), 01/30/2017

¡Portátil multimedia de 17 pulgadas! Los portátiles multimedia son sistemas muy versátiles. HP ofrece una base muy solida con un procesador Kaby Lake y una GPU dedicada. ¿Que tal funciona el conjunto?

HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Procesador
Intel Core i5-7200U
Adaptador gráfico
AMD Radeon R7 M440 - 2048 MB, Núcleo: 1021 MHz, Memoría: 1000 MHz, DDR3 (Samsung), AMD: Crimson 16.5; Intel: 21.20.16.4471, Intel HD Graphics 620
Memoría
8192 MB 
, DDR4, 2133 MHz, Single-Channel
pantalla
17.3 pulgadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixels 127 PPI, Chi Mei CMN1738, IPS, WLED, lustroso: no
Placa base
Intel Kaby Lake-Y Premium PCH
Disco duro
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G, 256 GB 
, M.2 2280, 180 GB libre
Tarjeta de sonido
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexiones
2 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Conexiones: Combo micrófono/auriculares, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Brightness Sensor
Equipamento de red
Realtek PCIe FE Family Controller 10/100 (10MBit), Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0
Unidad óptica
HP DVDRW GUD1N
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 24.9 x 417 x 279
Battería
41 Wh, 2550 mAh Litio-Ion, removeable, reemplazable
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionales
Altavoces: estereo, en la parte inferior, Teclado: chiclet, Luz de Teclado: no, Adaptador de corriente, Switch de audio de HP , HP JumpStart, HP Lounge, McAfee LiveSafe (versión de prueba de 30 dias), CyberLink PowerDirector, Netflix, 12 Meses Garantía
Peso
2.514 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 345 g
Precio
699 Euros

 

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
67.3 MB/s ∼100% +254%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
59 MB/s ∼88% +211%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
57.36 MB/s ∼85% +202%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
57.3 MB/s ∼85% +202%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
52.6 MB/s ∼78% +177%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
19 MB/s ∼28%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
85.3 MB/s ∼100% +316%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
81.04 MB/s ∼95% +295%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
80.9 MB/s ∼95% +295%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
24.9 MB/s ∼29% +21%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
20.5 MB/s ∼24%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
621 MBit/s ∼100% +1311%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC
44 MBit/s ∼7%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
413 MBit/s ∼100% +710%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC
51 MBit/s ∼12%
273
cd/m²
298
cd/m²
265
cd/m²
281
cd/m²
288
cd/m²
285
cd/m²
283
cd/m²
290
cd/m²
302
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 302 cd/m² Médio: 285 cd/m²
iluminación: 88 %
Brillo con batería: 288 cd/m²
Contraste: 472:1 (Negro: 0.61 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.56 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 4.95 | - Ø
93% sRGB (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.48
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Chi Mei CMN1738, , 1920x1080, 17.3
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Chi Mei CMN15C4, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
BOE HF NV156FHM-N42, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Innolux N156HGE-EAL, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
N140HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 14
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
Chi Mei, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
13%
-42%
139%
-1%
12%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
41 (16, 25)
39 (21, 18)
5%
51 (18, 33)
-24%
44 (24, 20, starke Schwankungen mit/ohne PSU)
-7%
40.8 (22, 18.8)
-0%
41 (19, 22)
-0%
Response Time Black / White *
30 (8, 22)
24 (19, 5)
20%
38 (8, 30)
-27%
23 (7, 16, Plateau)
23%
30.4 (8.4, 22)
-1%
23 (10, 13)
23%
PWM Frequency
200 (90)
50 (10)
-75%
1000 (80)
400%
Screen
-36%
31%
-47%
-5%
-43%
Brightness
285
169
-41%
265
-7%
219
-23%
231
-19%
228
-20%
Brightness Distribution
88
91
3%
86
-2%
80
-9%
89
1%
89
1%
Black Level *
0.61
0.47
23%
0.23
62%
0.48
21%
0.37
39%
0.49
20%
Contrast
472
374
-21%
1265
168%
488
3%
659
40%
490
4%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.56
8.83
-94%
4.78
-5%
11.8
-159%
6.41
-41%
10.96
-140%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.95
8.97
-81%
3.49
29%
13.3
-169%
5.94
-20%
11.34
-129%
Gamma
2.48 97%
2.43 99%
2.58 93%
2.47 97%
2.28 105%
2.27 106%
CCT
7669 85%
10234 64%
6013 108%
17098 38%
6101 107%
12292 53%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93
57.3
-38%
64
-31%
100
8%
61.1
-34%
60
-35%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
36.8
40
74
39.3
39
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
-12% / -25%
-6% / 9%
46% / 9%
-3% / -4%
-16% / -31%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Grayscale
Grayscale
ColorChecker
ColorChecker
Saturation Sweeps
Saturation Sweeps

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
30 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 8 ms subida
↘ 22 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 71 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (26.7 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
41 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 16 ms subida
↘ 25 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 48 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (42.8 ms).

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado 200 Hz90 % de brillo

La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 200 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 90 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM.

La frecuencia de 200 Hz es relativamente baja, por lo que la gente sensible debería ver parpadeos y padecer fatiga visual por la pantalla (usado al brillo indicado a continuación).

Comparación: 57 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 6577 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
Cinebench R10
Cinebench R10
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15
Jetstream 1.1
Jetstream 1.1
Octane V2
Octane V2
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
Intel Core i7-7500U
148 Points ∼76% +14%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
130 Points ∼67%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points ∼66% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points ∼66% -1%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U
119 Points ∼61% -8%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P
75 Points ∼38% -42%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
Intel Core i7-7500U
338 Points ∼16% +2%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
331 Points ∼15% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Intel Core i5-7200U
331 Points ∼15% 0%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
331 Points ∼15%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U
295 Points ∼14% -11%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P
215 Points ∼10% -35%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.48 Points ∼67% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.48 Points ∼67% 0%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.48 Points ∼67%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U
1.35 Points ∼61% -9%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P
0.87 Points ∼39% -41%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.7 Points ∼15% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.7 Points ∼15% 0%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.69 Points ∼15%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U
3.24 Points ∼14% -12%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P
2.59 Points ∼11% -30%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
6496 Points ∼53%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U
5829 Points ∼47% -10%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
14471 Points ∼35%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U
13058 Points ∼32% -10%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
Intel Core i7-7500U
244.58 Points ∼73% +15%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
220.75 Points ∼66% +4%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
213.08 Points ∼64%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Intel Core i5-7200U
207.21 Points ∼62% -3%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U
201.52 Points ∼60% -5%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P
127.57 Points ∼38% -40%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Intel Core i5-7200U
32356 Points ∼65% 0%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
32288 Points ∼65%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
32242 Points ∼65% 0%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U
30546 Points ∼62% -5%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P
18921 Points ∼38% -41%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P
2098.3 ms * ∼4% -77%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U
1216.2 ms * ∼2% -2%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
1186.7 ms * ∼2%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Intel Core i5-7200U
1163.8 ms * ∼2% +2%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
1139.5 ms * ∼2% +4%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
8207
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
11318
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5001
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
8347 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
14471 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
6496 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.69 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
26.42 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.48 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
331 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
130 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
34.47 fps
ayuda
PCMark 8 Home
PCMark 8 Creative
PCMark 7
PCMark 8
Storage Score v2
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
4841 Points ∼95%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
2112 Points ∼41% -56%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
1874 Points ∼37% -61%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
4429 Points ∼48%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)
4389 Points ∼47% -1%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
3872 Points ∼42% -13%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
3696 Points ∼40% -17%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P, 2400,
3569 Points ∼38% -19%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
Intel Core i7-7500U, 2700, Liteonit CV3-DE256
3778 Points ∼63% +22%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)
3546 Points ∼59% +14%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
3390 Points ∼57% +9%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
3162 Points ∼53% +2%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
3102 Points ∼52%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P, 2400,
2904 Points ∼49% -6%
PCMark 7
Productivity
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
3953 Points ∼36%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P, 2400,
3062 Points ∼28% -23%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
1591 Points ∼15% -60%
Score
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
5035 Points ∼63%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P, 2400,
4340 Points ∼54% -14%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
3021 Points ∼38% -40%
PCMark 7 Score
5035 puntos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3102 puntos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4429 puntos
ayuda
CrystalDiskMark
CrystalDiskMark
AS SSD
AS SSD
ATTO
ATTO
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
Liteonit CV3-DE256
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-92%
40%
-89%
39%
-10%
Write 4k QD32
272.7
0.722
-100%
245.9
-10%
0.884
-100%
178.3
-35%
131.4
-52%
Read 4k QD32
145.4
0.647
-100%
364.7
151%
0.895
-99%
276
90%
125
-14%
Write 4k
86.03
0.726
-99%
66.8
-22%
0.9
-99%
78.82
-8%
46.55
-46%
Read 4k
11.24
0.366
-97%
28.68
155%
0.413
-96%
35.15
213%
17.04
52%
Write 512
300.3
25.93
-91%
297.9
-1%
46.13
-85%
291.1
-3%
281.2
-6%
Read 512
290.2
29.32
-90%
338.3
17%
35.32
-88%
346.4
19%
261.9
-10%
Write Seq
325.1
85.61
-74%
431.5
33%
105.6
-68%
458.7
41%
316.6
-3%
Read Seq
500.1
95.33
-81%
469.2
-6%
108.1
-78%
476.5
-5%
502.8
1%
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
Sequential Read: 500.1 MB/s
Sequential Write: 325.1 MB/s
512K Read: 290.2 MB/s
512K Write: 300.3 MB/s
4K Read: 11.24 MB/s
4K Write: 86.03 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 145.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 272.7 MB/s
3DMark Ice Storm
3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited
3DMark Ice Storm Extreme
3DMark Cloud Gate
3DMark Sky Diver
3DMark Sky Diver Stresstest
3DMark Fire Strike
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra
3DMark Time Spy
3DMark 11
3DMark Vantage
3DMark 06
3DMark 05
3DMark 03
 
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
3574 Points ∼9% +200%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U
3555 Points ∼9% +199%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, AMD A10-9600P
2209 Points ∼5% +86%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U
1752 Points ∼4% +47%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
AMD Radeon R7 M440, Intel Core i5-7200U
1190 Points ∼3%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
22439 Points ∼14% +277%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U
21635 Points ∼13% +263%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, AMD A10-9600P
12483 Points ∼8% +110%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U
9501 Points ∼6% +60%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
AMD Radeon R7 M440, Intel Core i5-7200U
5953 Points ∼4%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
4251 Points ∼8% +86%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U
4239 Points ∼8% +86%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, AMD A10-9600P
3775 Points ∼7% +66%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U
2556 Points ∼5% +12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U
2436 Points ∼5% +7%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
AMD Radeon R7 M440, Intel Core i5-7200U
2280 Points ∼4%
3DMark 03 Standard
18884 puntos
3DMark 05 Standard
16534 puntos
3DMark 06 Standard
8950 puntos
3DMark Vantage P Result
5698 puntos
3DMark 11 Performance
2398 puntos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
45093 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
5168 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1083 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
547 puntos
3DMark Time Spy Score
433 puntos
ayuda
BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 Medium Preset
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
96.8 fps ∼100% +130%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
93.3 (min: 18.33) fps ∼96% +122%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
53.1 fps ∼55% +26%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
48.6 fps ∼50% +16%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX
42.9 fps ∼44% +2%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
AMD Radeon R7 M440
42 fps ∼43%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
35.8 fps ∼100% +201%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
31.6 fps ∼88% +166%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX
13.9 fps ∼39% +17%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
AMD Radeon R7 M440
11.9 fps ∼33%
Battlefield 4 - 1366x768 Medium Preset
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
81.4 fps ∼100% +121%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
78.6 fps ∼97% +113%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
46.7 fps ∼57% +27%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX
37.2 fps ∼46% +1%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
AMD Radeon R7 M440
36.9 fps ∼45%
bajo medio alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 73.64232.69.6fps
Battlefield 4 (2013) 51.236.923.37.6fps
GTA V (2015) 50.743.712.2fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 21.113.46.9fps
Anno 2205 (2015) 35.317.17fps
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) 5442.926.920.3fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 2211.963.5fps
XCOM 2 (2016) 22.87.95.24.9fps
Far Cry Primal (2016) 20.69.98.9fps
The Division (2016) 23.115.66.2fps
Doom (2016) 22138.1fps
Overwatch (2016) 60.542.622.312.4fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 13.910.15.2fps
FIFA 17 (2016) 61.859.734.629.7fps
Mafia 3 (2016) 148.9fps
Battlefield 1 (2016) 31.822.79.69.6fps
Civilization VI (2016) 36.426.19.5fps
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) 69.759.321.1fps
Titanfall 2 (2016) 41.129.811.2fps
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016) 26.422.612.1fps
Dishonored 2 (2016) 10.99.2fps
Watch Dogs 2 (2016) 18.713.6fps
Resident Evil 7 (2017) 40.515.9fps

Ruido

Ocioso
31 / 31 / 31 dB(A)
DVD
35.8 / dB(A)
Carga
33.8 / 44.8 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
7200U, Radeon R7 M440
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
7200U, GeForce GTX 950M
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
7500U, GeForce 940MX
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
6200U, GeForce GTX 950M
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
7200U, GeForce 940MX
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
A10-9600P, Radeon R8 M445DX
Noise
2%
-2%
-3%
5%
-5%
off / environment *
29
28.9
-0%
31.6
-9%
31.2
-8%
29
-0%
31.2
-8%
Idle Minimum *
31
30.8
1%
32.6
-5%
32.4
-5%
29
6%
31.7
-2%
Idle Average *
31
30.8
1%
32.6
-5%
33.5
-8%
29
6%
31.9
-3%
Idle Maximum *
31
30.8
1%
32.6
-5%
33.5
-8%
29
6%
31.9
-3%
Load Average *
33.8
33.4
1%
35.3
-4%
35.2
-4%
35.6
-5%
41
-21%
Load Maximum *
44.8
40.1
10%
37.1
17%
38.7
14%
38.5
14%
42.7
5%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.937.135.740.137.92538.736.638.635.538.73132.632.332.631.132.64029.432.33029.829.45029.530.330.129.529.56330.330.132.133.330.38028.228.626.927.828.210027.328.628.32727.312525.726.125.625.325.71602727.126.924.32720024.325.324.524.624.32502424.92422.42431523.224.823.321.823.240022.725.322.620.322.750022.526.221.72022.563022.628.421.218.922.680023.731.320.318.123.7100024.733.819.617.724.7125023.633.718.516.823.6160024.137.818.316.324.1200023.538.518.116.123.5250020.834.417.815.620.8315018.930.217.515.518.9400018.227.117.315.418.2500017.923.717.11517.9630017.821.417.215.317.8800017.619.717.215.217.61000017.318.11714.917.31250017.117.716.914.917.11600017.217.7171517.2SPL33.844.93129.133.8N24.11.61.22median 22.7HP Pavilion 17-x110ngmedian 26.2median 18.5median 16.8median 22.7Delta2.73.32.83.52.7hearing rangehide median Fan Noise
Stress test Prime95 + FurMark
Stress test Prime95 + FurMark
Stress test FurMark
Stress test FurMark
Stress test Prime95
Stress test Prime95
Carga Máx.
 37.5 °C40.2 °C24.9 °C 
 40.3 °C37.9 °C25.2 °C 
 29.3 °C31.3 °C24.6 °C 
Máximo: 40.3 °C
Médio: 32.4 °C
24 °C42.5 °C46.1 °C
24.3 °C33 °C42 °C
22.8 °C27.3 °C26.6 °C
Máximo: 46.1 °C
Médio: 32.1 °C
Conector de corriente  43.1 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 22 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
7200U, Radeon R7 M440
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
7200U, GeForce GTX 950M
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
7500U, GeForce 940MX
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
6200U, GeForce GTX 950M
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
7200U, GeForce 940MX
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
A10-9600P, Radeon R8 M445DX
Heat
-29%
3%
-27%
-12%
1%
Maximum Upper Side *
40.3
48.1
-19%
38.3
5%
46.6
-16%
43.8
-9%
33.4
17%
Maximum Bottom *
46.1
60.8
-32%
36
22%
65.4
-42%
53
-15%
32.9
29%
Idle Upper Side *
23.8
30.8
-29%
24.9
-5%
28.9
-21%
25.9
-9%
27.7
-16%
Idle Bottom *
23.4
31.9
-36%
25.6
-9%
29.8
-27%
27.1
-16%
29.4
-26%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

dts Studio Sound
dts Studio Sound
With equalizer
With equalizer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.340.140.3253735.5373135.631.135.64037.429.837.45039.429.539.4634033.340804127.84110040.42740.41254225.34216044.324.344.320048.524.648.525052.722.452.731557.621.857.640057.420.357.450061.62061.663067.618.967.680064.118.164.1100060.317.760.3125059.116.859.1160059.416.359.4200060.816.160.8250064.315.664.3315069.415.569.4400069.215.469.2500066.71566.7630062.915.362.9800060.815.260.81000063.714.963.71250067.514.967.51600069.41569.4SPL77.229.177.2N39.51.239.5median 60.8HP Pavilion 17-x110ngmedian 16.8median 60.8Delta4.33.54.335.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.5 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 7.7 / 14 / 15.1 Watt
Carga midlight 33 / 54.6 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
7200U, Radeon R7 M440
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
7200U, GeForce GTX 950M
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
7500U, GeForce 940MX
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
6200U, GeForce GTX 950M
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
7200U, GeForce 940MX
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
A10-9600P, Radeon R8 M445DX
Power Consumption
-2%
24%
-19%
26%
13%
Idle Minimum *
7.7
6
22%
3.9
49%
8.3
-8%
2.7
65%
5.5
29%
Idle Average *
14
8.1
42%
7.4
47%
12.1
14%
5.5
61%
8.2
41%
Idle Maximum *
15.1
9.8
35%
9.5
37%
15.4
-2%
6.5
57%
9.5
37%
Load Average *
33
52.5
-59%
41
-24%
56
-70%
44.2
-34%
44.5
-35%
Load Maximum *
54.6
81.6
-49%
48
12%
70
-28%
65.2
-19%
58
-6%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

The battery is replaceable and has a capacity of 41 Wh.
The battery is replaceable and ...
The battery is replaceable and has a capacity of 41 Wh.
... has a capacity of 41 Wh.
Maximum battery runtime
Maximum battery runtime
Minimum battery runtime
Minimum battery runtime
WLAN runtime
WLAN runtime
H.264 runtime
H.264 runtime
Charging
Charging
Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
8h 47min
Navegando con WLAN v1.3 (EDGE: 38.14393.0.0)
5h 46min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
4h 47min
Carga (máximo brillo)
1h 30min
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
41 Wh
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
62 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
30 Wh
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
62 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
45 Wh
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
41 Wh
Duración de Batería
30%
-21%
31%
51%
-11%
Reader / Idle
527
767
46%
667
27%
1043
98%
560
6%
H.264
287
460
60%
335
17%
503
75%
194
-32%
WiFi v1.3
346
451
30%
275
-21%
386
12%
326
-6%
260
-25%
Load
90
75
-17%
152
69%
124
38%
95
6%

Pro

+ Buen rendimiento del sistema gracias a un rápido procesador
+ Apenas se calienta
+ El procesador no baja su rendimiento debido a la temperatura
+ Pantalla con buenos ángulos de visualización
+ Pantalla mat
+ Escaso ruido del sistema
+ Bajo peso a pesar de las 17 pulgadas
+ Unidad óptica disponible
+ SSD

Contra

- Teclado sin iluminación
- No puede con todos los juegos, a pesar de la GPU dedicada
- Sin ranura de mantenimiento
- Bajo rendimiento de la tarjeta WLAN
- Solo 256 GB de almacenamiento
- No tiene HDD
- Lector de tarjetas muy lento
Análisis: HP Pavilion 17-x110ng. Modelo de prueba cedido por Notebooksbilliger.
Análisis: HP Pavilion 17-x110ng. Modelo de prueba cedido por Notebooksbilliger.

El portátil multimedia de 17 pulgadas Pavilion 17-x110ng se vende por 699 euros. Está equipado con una combinación de un procesador Intel y una tarjeta gráfica dentro de un discreto chasis negro de plástico. La CPU Intel Core i5-7200U es un moderno chip Kaby Lake, y el eficiente SoC de doble núcleo proporciona rendimiento suficiente para la mayoría de las aplicaciones multimedia. También se agradecen los 8 GB de RAM DDR4 y no debería haber ningún problema con aplicaciones exigentes. La pantalla IPS proporciona buenos ángulos de visualización y la iluminación es buena y uniforme.

El HP Pavilion 17-x110ng nos ha convencido gracias al buen rendimiento del sistema, pero las posibilidades de usarlo para juegos son limitadas debido a la lenta tarjeta gráfica.

Una tarjeta gráfica dedicada es un buen añadido, pero deberías pensar en que uso le vas a dar ya que su rendimiento solo permite jugar con fluidez a bajas resoluciones. La solución de almacenamiento es buena y mala a la vez. Tiene sentido usar un rápido SSD como unidad del sistema, pero 256 GB pueden no ser suficiente para un dispositivo multimedia, en el que cuanto más espacio mejor.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

HP Pavilion 17-x110ng - 01/24/2017 v6
Sebastian Bade

Acabado
78 / 98 → 80%
Teclado
78%
Ratón
77%
Conectividad
40 / 81 → 49%
Peso
60 / 67 → 84%
Battería
82%
Pantalla
85%
Rendimiento de juegos
58 / 85 → 69%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
83 / 92 → 90%
Temperatura
93%
Ruido
87 / 95 → 92%
Audio
59%
Cámara
42 / 85 → 50%
Médio
71%
79%
Multimedia - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del portátil HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Sebastian Bade, 2017-01-30 (Update: 2017-01-30)