Notebookcheck Logo

Breve análisis del MSI GE72VR 6RF Apache Pro

¡Apache a la vista! La conocida marca de portátiles gaming MSI nos trae una combinación interesante. Un veloz procesador quad core de la familia Skylake y una GPU Pascal son el corazón de su último modelo. Descubre lo bien que encajan los componentes entre sí en nuestro análisis exhaustivo.
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 (GE72 Serie)
Procesador
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 4 x 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake
Adaptador gráfico
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Núcleo: 1405 MHz, Memoría: 4000 MHz, GDDR5 (Samsung), ForceWare 376.33, Nvidia Optimus
Memoría
16 GB 
, 2x 8 GB DDR4-2400 SO-DIMM, Dual-Channel, 2 ranuras (ocupadas), max. 32 GB
pantalla
17.30 pulgadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels 127 PPI, N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN LED, 120Hz, Full HD, lustroso: no
Placa base
Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)
Disco duro
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY, 256 GB 
, SSD + HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, 1TB HDD @ 7200 rpm. Bays: 1x m.2 (opcional PCIe/NVMe), 1x 2.5"
Tarjeta de sonido
Realtek ALC899 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Conexiones: 2 clavijas 3.5mm (auriculares & micrófono), Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC, Brightness Sensor
Equipamento de red
Killer E2400 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0
Unidad óptica
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUD0N
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 32 x 420 x 288
Battería
51 Wh, 4730 mAh Litio-Ion, 6 celdas
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD, 720p @ 30 fps
Características adicionales
Altavoces: 4x altavoces 2W , 1x woofer 3W , Teclado: Chiclet, 3 zonas (Full-Color), Luz de Teclado: si, adaptador de corriente 180 W, accesorios: guía de inicio rápido, Software: Dragon Center, MSI True Color, Nahimic 2, Steel Series Engine 3, 24 Meses Garantía
Peso
2.99 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 590 g
Precio
1750 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

423 mm 322 mm 40 mm 4.2 kg428 mm 305 mm 25 mm 3.2 kg418 mm 287 mm 34.2 mm 3.6 kg420 mm 288 mm 32 mm 3 kg416 mm 279 mm 33 mm 3.3 kg415 mm 280 mm 24 mm 2.7 kg411.8 mm 284.9 mm 19.6 mm 2.4 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
 
78 MB/s +290%
Aorus X7 v6
 
78 MB/s +290%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
 
76 MB/s +280%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
 
72.6 MB/s +263%
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
 
68.1 MB/s +241%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
 
23.8 MB/s +19%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
 
20 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
 
88 MB/s +340%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
 
87 MB/s +335%
Aorus X7 v6
 
87 MB/s +335%
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
 
86.2 MB/s +331%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
 
84.6 MB/s +323%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
 
27.6 MB/s +38%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
 
20 MB/s
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Aorus X7 v6
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
554 MBit/s +85%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
529 MBit/s +77%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
299 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
676 MBit/s +119%
Aorus X7 v6
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
496 MBit/s +61%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
308 MBit/s

MSI Dragon Center

MSI Dragon Center, APP-Portal
APP-Portal
MSI Dragon Center, System Monitor
System Monitor
MSI Dragon Center, LED-Assistent
LED-Assistent
MSI Dragon Center, System Tuner
System Tuner
MSI Dragon Center, Mobile Center
Mobile Center
MSI Dragon Center, Tools & Help
Tools & Help

MSI Dragon Dashboard

MSI Dragon Dashboard, System Monitor
System Monitor
MSI Dragon Dashboard, LED Wizard
LED Wizard
MSI Dragon Dashboard System, Tuner
System Tuner
237
cd/m²
275
cd/m²
255
cd/m²
244
cd/m²
270
cd/m²
259
cd/m²
243
cd/m²
238
cd/m²
262
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 275 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 253.7 cd/m² Minimum: 4 cd/m²
iluminación: 86 %
Brillo con batería: 270 cd/m²
Contraste: 1038:1 (Negro: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.33 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.46 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
75% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
83.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.13
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), 1920x1080
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3, 1920x1080
MSI GS73VR 6RF
1920x1080
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
LP173WF4-SPD1, 1920x1080
HP Omen 17-w110ng
LG Philips LGD046E, 1920x1080
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), 3840x2160
Aorus X7 v6
B173QTN01.0 (AUO1096), 2560x1440
Display
-24%
0%
-23%
5%
-25%
Display P3 Coverage
90.2
65.1
-28%
90
0%
66.6
-26%
86.9
-4%
60.9
-32%
sRGB Coverage
99.8
83.5
-16%
99.9
0%
84.1
-16%
100
0%
84.2
-16%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
83.9
61.1
-27%
83.6
0%
61.5
-27%
99.4
18%
61.2
-27%
Response Times
-112%
-10%
-96%
-116%
-116%
-18%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
28 ?(12, 16)
38 ?(12, 26)
-36%
28 ?(13.2, 14.8)
-0%
29 ?(12, 17)
-4%
37 ?(13, 24)
-32%
37 ?(13, 24)
-32%
31 ?(11, 20)
-11%
Response Time Black / White *
8 ?(5, 3)
23 ?(5, 18)
-188%
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
-20%
23 ?(7, 16)
-188%
24 ?(4, 20)
-200%
24 ?(5, 19)
-200%
10 ?(3, 7)
-25%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-42%
8%
-24%
-7%
6%
-44%
Brightness middle
270
326
21%
337.2
25%
390
44%
362
34%
336
24%
343
27%
Brightness
254
312
23%
315
24%
355
40%
342
35%
320
26%
312
23%
Brightness Distribution
86
91
6%
86
0%
79
-8%
87
1%
88
2%
80
-7%
Black Level *
0.26
0.5
-92%
0.308
-18%
0.39
-50%
0.31
-19%
0.25
4%
0.5
-92%
Contrast
1038
652
-37%
1095
5%
1000
-4%
1168
13%
1344
29%
686
-34%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.33
6.3
-89%
2.96
11%
5.9
-77%
4.5
-35%
3.61
-8%
7.33
-120%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.07
11.69
-93%
5.45
10%
9.89
-63%
9.31
-53%
6.02
1%
10.79
-78%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.46
7.37
-113%
2.57
26%
6.17
-78%
3.48
-1%
4.78
-38%
7.6
-120%
Gamma
2.13 103%
2.37 93%
2.25 98%
2.24 98%
2.23 99%
2.32 95%
2.19 100%
CCT
7419 88%
7116 91%
7114 91%
6955 93%
6144 106%
6185 105%
9024 72%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
75
55
-27%
74.3
-1%
55
-27%
55
-27%
88
17%
55
-27%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
83
-17%
100
0%
84
-16%
84
-16%
100
0%
84
-16%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
-59% / -48%
-1% / 4%
-60% / -36%
-49% / -25%
-35% / -11%
-29% / -37%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
8 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 5 ms subida
↘ 3 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta rápidos en nuestros tests y debería ser adecuada para juegos.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 16 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (21.6 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
28 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 12 ms subida
↘ 16 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 31 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (33.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 18110 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 3846000) Hz.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
DPC-Latenzen
Intel Extreme Tuning Utility
 
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X7 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
170 Points +21%
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
Intel Core i7-6820HK
154 Points +10%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points +6%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
141 Points +1%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
140 Points
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
134 Points -4%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
134 Points -4%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus X7 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
807 Points +19%
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
Intel Core i7-6820HK
704 Points +4%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
679 Points 0%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
678 Points 0%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
676 Points
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
671 Points -1%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
656 Points -3%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X7 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.93 Points +25%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.69 Points +9%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.55 Points
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.5 Points -3%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.5 Points -3%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus X7 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
8.88 Points +20%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.47 Points +1%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.47 Points +1%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.41 Points 0%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.39 Points
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7206 Points +17%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
6145 Points
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
26510 Points +2%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
25885 Points
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
269.2 Points +26%
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
Intel Core i7-6820HK
236 Points +10%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
232.4 Points +9%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
230.8 Points +8%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
213.9 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
Intel Core i7-6820HK
37616 Points +22%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
37205 Points +21%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
34352 Points +12%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
33508 Points +9%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
30722 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1179 ms *
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1082 ms * +8%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1067 ms * +9%
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1010 ms * +14%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
3866
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
19720
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4720
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
4138 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
25885 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
6145 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.39 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
58.3 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.55 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
676 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
140 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
92.2 fps
ayuda
PCMark 7 - Score
Aorus X7 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK, 2700 MHz, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5946 Points +2%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
5809 Points
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
5556 Points -4%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4114 Points -29%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
4833 Points +21%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4670 Points +17%
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
Intel Core i7-6820HK, 2700 MHz, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH
4214 Points +6%
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
Intel Core i7-6820HK, 2700 MHz, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH
4214 Points +6%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
4060 Points +2%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4012 Points +1%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
3985 Points
Creative Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
7128 Points +44%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
6361 Points +29%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
5062 Points +3%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
4933 Points
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
2303 Points -53%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
5394 Points +12%
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
Intel Core i7-6820HK, 2700 MHz, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH
5104 Points +6%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
4831 Points
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4809 Points 0%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4774 Points -1%
Storage Score v2
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
5018 Points +2%
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
Intel Core i7-6820HK, 2700 MHz, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH
4962 Points 0%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
4942 Points
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4230 Points -14%
PCMark Vantage Result
20205 puntos
PCMark 7 Score
5809 puntos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3985 puntos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4933 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4831 puntos
ayuda
The SSD from Toshiba uses ...
The SSD from Toshiba uses ...
... the M.2-2280 slot.
... the M.2-2280 slot.
The 1 TB HDD stems from HGST ...
The 1 TB HDD stems from HGST ...
... and rotates at 7200 rpm.
... and rotates at 7200 rpm.
CrystalDiskMark SSD
CrystalDiskMark SSD
ATTO SSD
ATTO SSD
CrystalDiskMark HDD
CrystalDiskMark HDD
HD Tune HDD
HD Tune HDD
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
MSI GS73VR 6RF
SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
Aorus X7 v6
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-86%
-18%
35%
65%
197%
Read Seq
510
134.6
-74%
334.3
-34%
513
1%
1156
127%
1499
194%
Write Seq
274.6
130.6
-52%
319
16%
483.7
76%
294.9
7%
1411
414%
Read 512
427.2
44.85
-90%
242.3
-43%
452.4
6%
616
44%
966
126%
Write 512
247.2
63.3
-74%
254.4
3%
404.2
64%
294.7
19%
1103
346%
Read 4k
21.23
0.602
-97%
20.3
-4%
37.48
77%
42.7
101%
44.33
109%
Write 4k
86.8
1.146
-99%
42.51
-51%
91.4
5%
153.3
77%
155.5
79%
Read 4k QD32
335.4
1.106
-100%
251.6
-25%
364.4
9%
600
79%
696
108%
Write 4k QD32
178.1
1.186
-99%
167.1
-6%
250.9
41%
295.3
66%
531
198%
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
Sequential Read: 510 MB/s
Sequential Write: 274.6 MB/s
512K Read: 427.2 MB/s
512K Write: 247.2 MB/s
4K Read: 21.23 MB/s
4K Write: 86.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 335.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 178.1 MB/s
3DMark Ice Storm
3DMark Ice Storm
3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited
3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited
3DMark Ice Storm Extreme
3DMark Ice Storm Extreme
3DMark Cloud Gate
3DMark Cloud Gate
3DMark Sky Diver
3DMark Sky Diver
3DMark Time Spy
3DMark Time Spy
3DMark Fire Strike
3DMark Fire Strike
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra
3DMark 11
3DMark 11
3DMark Vantage
3DMark Vantage
3DMark 06
3DMark 06
3DMark 05
3DMark 05
3DMark 03
3DMark 03
 
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Aorus X7 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
23591 Points +57%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
21228 Points +41%
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
21172 Points +41%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
20656 Points +38%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
15019 Points
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
14904 Points -1%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
14317 Points -5%
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Aorus X7 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
17068 Points +47%
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
16046 Points +38%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
15806 Points +36%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
15718 Points +35%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11617 Points
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11506 Points -1%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11311 Points -3%
3DMark 03 Standard
87152 puntos
3DMark 05 Standard
23823 puntos
3DMark 06 Standard Score
25697 puntos
3DMark Vantage P Result
33893 puntos
3DMark 11 Performance
12474 puntos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
81901 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22892 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9704 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
5118 puntos
3DMark Time Spy Score
3648 puntos
ayuda
Rise of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Aorus X7 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
111 fps +56%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
107.6 fps +51%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
105.6 (96min - 115max) fps +48%
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
97.1 fps +36%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
72.4 fps +2%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
71.3 (65min - 82max) fps
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Aorus X7 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
97 fps +65%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
89.7 (80min - 102max) fps +53%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
85.5 fps +45%
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
84.2 fps +43%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
61.4 fps +4%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
58.8 (53min - 68max) fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided
1920x1080 High Preset AF:4x
Aorus X7 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
74.1 fps +30%
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
66.7 fps +17%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
57.1 (46.3min - 70.4max) fps
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
48.7 fps -15%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:2xMS AF:8x
Aorus X7 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
41.1 fps +37%
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
37.5 fps +25%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
30.1 (23.4min - 38.6max) fps
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
27.3 fps -9%
BioShock Infinite
1366x768 High Preset
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
166.4 fps +4%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
161 (35.8min - 354.6max) fps +1%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
159.5 (15min - 320.2max) fps
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
156.9 fps -2%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
103.8 (19.8min - 180.2max) fps +6%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
100 fps +2%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
98.9 fps +1%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
98 (11.6min - 188.3max) fps
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
103.8 fps +57%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
94.8 (69min - 112max) fps +43%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
66.2 (39min - 74max) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
58 fps +56%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
50.8 (41min - 58max) fps +37%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
37.2 (25min - 45max) fps
bajo medio alto ultra4K
BioShock Infinite (2013) 181.3 175.9 159.5 98
The Witcher 3 (2015) 177 135.9 66.2 37.2 24.7
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 180 132.4 71.3 58.8 23.7
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 113.9 100.3 57.1 30.1
Two small fans ...
Two small fans ...
... and a total of 6 heatpipes ...
... and a total of 6 heatpipes ...
... constitute the cooling system.
... constitute the cooling system.

Ruido

Ocioso
34 / 35 / 36 dB(A)
DVD
41 / dB(A)
Carga
40 / 51 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 31 dB(A)
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Aorus X7 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Noise
7%
2%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
off / environment *
31
30.5
2%
28.4
8%
31.2
-1%
30
3%
31
-0%
30
3%
Idle Minimum *
34
31.4
8%
31.9
6%
31.2
8%
33
3%
33
3%
33
3%
Idle Average *
35
31.4
10%
32
9%
32.6
7%
34
3%
34
3%
35
-0%
Idle Maximum *
36
31.5
12%
34
6%
34.75
3%
35
3%
40
-11%
40
-11%
Load Average *
40
40.9
-2%
47
-18%
47.8
-20%
45
-13%
44
-10%
43
-8%
Load Maximum *
51
46.2
9%
49.4
3%
49.7
3%
52
-2%
50
2%
54
-6%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Stress test: Furmark + Prime95
Stress test: Furmark + Prime95
Full load (top side; Optris PI 640)
Full load (top side; Optris PI 640)
Full load (underside; Optris PI 640)
Full load (underside; Optris PI 640)
Carga Máx.
 47.4 °C48.5 °C44.3 °C 
 47.6 °C48.8 °C42.4 °C 
 41.6 °C40.7 °C27.8 °C 
Máximo: 48.8 °C
Médio: 43.2 °C
39.4 °C41.4 °C48.2 °C
31.7 °C37.8 °C43.4 °C
22.9 °C31.7 °C36.7 °C
Máximo: 48.2 °C
Médio: 37 °C
Conector de corriente  44.8 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.8 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.5 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41.6 °C / 106.9 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-12.7 °C / -22.9 F).
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Aorus X7 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Heat
-5%
-4%
-2%
1%
4%
0%
Maximum Upper Side *
48.8
53.1
-9%
50.8
-4%
53.3
-9%
45
8%
42.6
13%
47.5
3%
Maximum Bottom *
48.2
44.9
7%
60
-24%
50
-4%
54.3
-13%
44.9
7%
54.5
-13%
Idle Upper Side *
30.1
32.9
-9%
27.4
9%
30.3
-1%
29.6
2%
33.1
-10%
28.6
5%
Idle Bottom *
30.4
33.4
-10%
28.8
5%
28
8%
28.6
6%
28.9
5%
28.8
5%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

The speakers are located...
The speakers are located...
... in front part of the base unit.
... in front part of the base unit.
The subwoofer sits further back.
The subwoofer sits further back.
Software allows to adjust the sound...
Software allows to adjust the sound...
... according to your requirements.
... according to your requirements.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.437.62540.741.33138.442.94032.238.15029.139632839.88025.445.210023.9511252359.916023.959.120022.366.225022.568.731520.976.440019.478.350020.282.163019.483.180019.781.3100019.579.2125019.477.9160019.681.3200019.381250019.583.7315019.479.4400019.481.4500019.277.7630019.274.380001970.9100001977.91250018.872.91600018.670.3SPL31.692.2N1.6101median 19.4median 77.9Delta0.85.337.942.234.836.927.730.132.740.628.630.426.427.629.530.826.131.424.627.922.336.523.755.322.662.320.563.219.562.519.262.91967.818.668.91868.418.363.91970.518.171.118.268.818.470.618.374.718.474.518.577.818.67518.678.818.57618.665.730.8851.562.2median 18.6median 68.41.65.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI GE72VR-6RF16H21HP Omen 17-w110ng
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HP Omen 17-w110ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.4 / 1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 13 / 20 / 26 Watt
Carga midlight 83 / 169 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Voltcraft VC 940
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Aorus X7 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Power Consumption
0%
-40%
-10%
-22%
-60%
-62%
Idle Minimum *
13
15.6
-20%
22.6
-74%
14
-8%
19
-46%
25
-92%
29
-123%
Idle Average *
20
20.2
-1%
32.7
-64%
20
-0%
25
-25%
35
-75%
31
-55%
Idle Maximum *
26
21.4
18%
32.8
-26%
23.8
8%
31
-19%
46
-77%
38
-46%
Load Average *
83
90
-8%
114.7
-38%
103
-24%
90
-8%
103
-24%
111
-34%
Load Maximum *
169
147
13%
167.9
1%
212
-25%
193
-14%
223
-32%
253
-50%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

maximum battery life
maximum battery life
minimum battery life
minimum battery life
Wi-Fi battery life
Wi-Fi battery life
H.264 battery life
H.264 battery life
Charging time
Charging time
Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
3h 16min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38.14393.0.0)
2h 22min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
2h 20min
Carga (máximo brillo)
0h 40min
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
51 Wh
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
76 Wh
MSI GS73VR 6RF
65 Wh
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
60 Wh
HP Omen 17-w110ng
95 Wh
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
88 Wh
Aorus X7 v6
94 Wh
Duración de Batería
90%
65%
-3%
112%
69%
28%
Reader / Idle
196
353
80%
353
80%
163
-17%
432
120%
278
42%
H.264
140
262
87%
233
66%
WiFi v1.3
142
250
76%
213
50%
91
-36%
247
74%
200
41%
182
28%
Load
40
87
118%
66
65%
57
43%
115
188%
89
123%

Pro

+ diseño atracitvo
+ buena calidad de construcción
+ teclado cómodo con luz inteligente
+ display mate 120 Hz
+ sólo pesa 3.0 kg
+ GeForce GTX 1060 con 6 GB de VRAM
+ buen rendimiento gaming
+ MSI Dragon Center + Dragon Dashboard para el smartphone

Contra

- lector SD lentísimo
- touchpad algo pequeño
- poco aguante de batería
- sin SSD NVMe
MSI GE72VR. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de MSI Alemania
MSI GE72VR. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de MSI Alemania

MSI ofrece muchos buenos dispositivos de gama alta. Sin embargo, no todos están dispuestos a gastarse 2,000 Euros en un portátil. Con el GE72VR, el fabricante abastece a la clase media-alta y cobra 1,750 Euros por la configuración de pruebas. Sin embargo, nuestro modelo de pruebas no gana en términos de precio-rendimiento, ya que el HP Omen (Pascal) tiene una GPU bastante más rápida con la GeForce GTX 1070 y está en la misma categoría de precios que el GE72VR. El portátil de 17" puede puntuar particularmente con su elegante y esbelto diseño y su buena calidad de construcción. Tampoco deberías desdeñar el display 120-Hz, ya que es una característica única y rinde muy bien a pesar de la tecnología TN. Trucos como el teclado iluminado y el Dragon Center de MSI son buenos y deberían mantenerse.

Los que compren el GE72VR se llevarán un portátil gaming sólido con rendimiento suficiente para los juegos actuales. Detalles y buenas características completan el paquete. Además, los jugones encontrarán atractivo el display 120 Hz.

Aparte de las impresiones positivas, también hay algunas quejas. Por ejemplo, la superficie de entrada ligeramente pequeña del  touchpad dificulta más el control multitáctil (ej. zoom). Además, tenemos que criticar el pobre aguante de batería. Quizá el fabricante se replantee la capacidad de la batería en futuros dispositivos y, así, creará un uso más verástil.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 - 12/29/2016 v6(old)
Sebastian Bade

Acabado
78 / 98 → 79%
Teclado
81%
Ratón
78%
Conectividad
60 / 81 → 74%
Peso
57 / 10-66 → 83%
Battería
65%
Pantalla
87%
Rendimiento de juegos
92%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
89%
Temperatura
85 / 95 → 89%
Ruido
69 / 90 → 77%
Audio
78%
Cámara
65 / 85 → 76%
Médio
76%
83%
Gaming - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del MSI GE72VR 6RF Apache Pro
Sebastian Bade, 2017-01-10 (Update: 2017-01-10)