Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del Smartphone Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S

Marcus Herbrich (traducido por Francisco García), 12/14/2016

Alto contraset. El dispositivo "insignia" Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S de la línea Pop 4 está preparado para pasar nuestras pruebas. El asequible smartphone de gama media ofrece una configuración técnica interesante en conjunto con una pantalla IPS de altísimo contraste. Sin embargo, su rendimiento de sistema no puede competir con smartphones de gama media de precio similar.

Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S (One Touch Serie)
Procesador
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755
Adaptador gráfico
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Memoría
2048 MB 
pantalla
5.5 pulgadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixels 401 PPI, capacitiva, multitáctil, LCD, IPS, totalmente laminado, baño oleofóbico, lustroso: si
Disco duro
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.38 GB libre
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, Audio Conexiones: clavija headset 3.5mm, Card Reader: micro-SD (max 64 GB), 1 Lector de Huellas Digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Hall, giroscopio, Miracast, USB-OTG
Equipamento de red
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM cuadribanda 850/900/1800/1900 (900/1900 para 5095S) UMTS 850/900/1700/1900/2100 (B900/1900 para 5095S) FDD LTE B2/3/4/5/7/17/27/28 (B7/28 completo para 5095S), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 8 x 152 x 77
Battería
2960 mAh Litio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix autofoco con detección de fase 0.3s, sensor de 1/3.06, apertura f/2.0
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix amplio ángulo de visión (84.4°), flash frontal
Características adicionales
Altavoces: mono, Teclado: virtual, Luz de Teclado: si, cable USB, adaptador modular de corriente, Alcatel OS, 24 Meses Garantía, SAR rate: 1.1 (body), fanless
Peso
150 g, Suministro de Electricidad: 28 g
Precio
200 Euros

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
UMI Max
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
103 MBit/s ∼100% +11%
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
92.9 MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
UMI Max
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
98.8 MBit/s ∼100% +5%
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
94.1 MBit/s ∼95%
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Moto Z
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
491 MBit/s ∼100%
UMI Super Euro Edition
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
109 MBit/s ∼22%
Vernee Mars
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
81.1 MBit/s ∼17%
Honor 5C
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.8 MBit/s ∼10%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
47.6 MBit/s ∼10%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45.6 MBit/s ∼9%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Moto Z
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
360 MBit/s ∼100%
UMI Super Euro Edition
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
108 MBit/s ∼30%
Honor 5C
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
58.3 MBit/s ∼16%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
50 MBit/s ∼14%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.7 MBit/s ∼13%
Vernee Mars
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
38.9 MBit/s ∼11%
GPS test Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
GPS test Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
GPS test Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
GPS test Garmin Edge 500

Comparación de Imágenes

Elige una escena y navega dentro de la primera imagen. Un click cambia el nivel de zoom. Un click en la imagen aumentada abre la original en una ventana nueva. La primera imagen muestra la fotografía escalada del dispositivo de pruebas.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click para cargar imágenes
387
cd/m²
433
cd/m²
423
cd/m²
394
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
395
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
460
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 460 cd/m² Médio: 423.9 cd/m² Minimum: 16.02 cd/m²
iluminación: 84 %
Brillo con batería: 445 cd/m²
Contraste: 4450:1 (Negro: 0.1 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.8 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 10 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.87
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Vernee Mars
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Honor 5C
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
ZTE Blade V7
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
UMI Max
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
UMI Super Euro Edition
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Lenovo Moto Z
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Screen
-7%
-63%
-60%
-20%
-27%
-45%
-52%
45%
Brightness
424
339
-20%
498
17%
411
-3%
498
17%
410
-3%
420
-1%
414
-2%
490
16%
Brightness Distribution
84
85
1%
93
11%
96
14%
86
2%
85
1%
94
12%
94
12%
92
10%
Black Level *
0.1
0.14
-40%
0.49
-390%
0.38
-280%
0.23
-130%
0.31
-210%
0.33
-230%
0.42
-320%
Contrast
4450
2464
-45%
1051
-76%
1076
-76%
2270
-49%
1348
-70%
1255
-72%
981
-78%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
9.8
7.1
28%
6.2
37%
9.4
4%
6.9
30%
4.4
55%
8.1
17%
5.6
43%
2.1
79%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
10
6.7
33%
7.4
26%
11.6
-16%
9.2
8%
3.6
64%
9.6
4%
6.9
31%
2.6
74%
Gamma
2.87 84%
2.47 97%
2.28 105%
2.25 107%
2.38 101%
2.36 102%
2 120%
2.4 100%
2.23 108%
CCT
7990 81%
7711 84%
8664 75%
9597 68%
8687 75%
6993 93%
7754 84%
8422 77%
6843 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
88.14
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 54 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8586 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
36 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 9 ms subida
↘ 27 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 90 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (26.6 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
88 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 40 ms subida
↘ 48 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 99 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (42.5 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
12.54 MB/s ∼14%
Vernee Mars
24 MB/s ∼28% +91%
Honor 5C
24.21 MB/s ∼28% +93%
ZTE Blade V7
20.89 MB/s ∼24% +67%
UMI Max
18.07 MB/s ∼21% +44%
UMI Super Euro Edition
17.88 MB/s ∼21% +43%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
16.17 MB/s ∼19% +29%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
51.1 MB/s ∼59% +307%
Lenovo Moto Z
45.64 MB/s ∼52% +264%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
16.32 MB/s ∼17%
Vernee Mars
44.5 MB/s ∼46% +173%
Honor 5C
51.93 MB/s ∼54% +218%
ZTE Blade V7
43.67 MB/s ∼45% +168%
UMI Max
36.64 MB/s ∼38% +125%
UMI Super Euro Edition
36.22 MB/s ∼38% +122%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
27.68 MB/s ∼29% +70%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
65.5 MB/s ∼68% +301%
Lenovo Moto Z
78.51 MB/s ∼81% +381%
Random Write 4KB (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
4.67 MB/s ∼3%
Vernee Mars
15.77 MB/s ∼10% +238%
Honor 5C
15.7 MB/s ∼10% +236%
ZTE Blade V7
7.58 MB/s ∼5% +62%
UMI Max
10.91 MB/s ∼7% +134%
UMI Super Euro Edition
11.88 MB/s ∼7% +154%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
7.95 MB/s ∼5% +70%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
28.31 MB/s ∼17% +506%
Lenovo Moto Z
74.93 MB/s ∼46% +1504%
Random Read 4KB (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
16.68 MB/s ∼10%
Vernee Mars
21.66 MB/s ∼13% +30%
Honor 5C
61.7 MB/s ∼36% +270%
ZTE Blade V7
28.07 MB/s ∼16% +68%
UMI Max
26.66 MB/s ∼15% +60%
UMI Super Euro Edition
28.17 MB/s ∼16% +69%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
20.25 MB/s ∼12% +21%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
17.9 MB/s ∼10% +7%
Lenovo Moto Z
117.15 MB/s ∼68% +602%
Sequential Write 256KB (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
12.19 MB/s ∼6%
Vernee Mars
71.58 MB/s ∼34% +487%
Honor 5C
75.5 MB/s ∼36% +519%
ZTE Blade V7
39.45 MB/s ∼19% +224%
UMI Max
69.5 MB/s ∼33% +470%
UMI Super Euro Edition
126.95 MB/s ∼61% +941%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
39.51 MB/s ∼19% +224%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
43.95 MB/s ∼21% +261%
Lenovo Moto Z
168.32 MB/s ∼81% +1281%
Sequential Read 256KB (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
143.74 MB/s ∼18%
Vernee Mars
255.87 MB/s ∼32% +78%
Honor 5C
263 MB/s ∼33% +83%
ZTE Blade V7
196.76 MB/s ∼25% +37%
UMI Max
257.9 MB/s ∼32% +79%
UMI Super Euro Edition
257.8 MB/s ∼32% +79%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
178.65 MB/s ∼22% +24%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
144.12 MB/s ∼18% 0%
Lenovo Moto Z
439.66 MB/s ∼55% +206%
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
44326 Points ∼19%
Vernee Mars
51008 Points ∼22% +15%
Honor 5C
53143 Points ∼23% +20%
ZTE Blade V7
37070 Points ∼16% -16%
UMI Max
49057 Points ∼22% +11%
UMI Super Euro Edition
50072 Points ∼22% +13%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
30676 Points ∼13% -31%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
28399 Points ∼12% -36%
Lenovo Moto Z
129197 Points ∼57% +191%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Honor 5C
3914 Points ∼10%
ZTE Blade V7
2669 Points ∼7%
Lenovo Moto Z
5450 Points ∼14%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Honor 5C
906 Points ∼18%
ZTE Blade V7
614 Points ∼12%
Lenovo Moto Z
2080 Points ∼42%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
2798 Points ∼10%
Vernee Mars
2903 Points ∼11% +4%
UMI Max
2701 Points ∼10% -3%
UMI Super Euro Edition
2818 Points ∼10% +1%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
1588 Points ∼6% -43%
Lenovo Moto Z
3946 Points ∼14% +41%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
733 Points ∼13%
Vernee Mars
729 Points ∼13% -1%
UMI Max
734 Points ∼13% 0%
UMI Super Euro Edition
727 Points ∼13% -1%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
572 Points ∼10% -22%
Lenovo Moto Z
1480 Points ∼26% +102%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
1273 Points ∼41%
Vernee Mars
1338 Points ∼43% +5%
Honor 5C
1418 Points ∼46% +11%
ZTE Blade V7
914 Points ∼30% -28%
UMI Max
1247 Points ∼41% -2%
UMI Super Euro Edition
1117 Points ∼36% -12%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
882 Points ∼29% -31%
Lenovo Moto Z
1797 Points ∼58% +41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
269 Points ∼5%
Vernee Mars
356 Points ∼7% +32%
Honor 5C
317 Points ∼6% +18%
ZTE Blade V7
159 Points ∼3% -41%
UMI Max
354 Points ∼7% +32%
UMI Super Euro Edition
350 Points ∼7% +30%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
102 Points ∼2% -62%
Lenovo Moto Z
2336 Points ∼43% +768%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
326 Points ∼8%
Vernee Mars
425 Points ∼11% +30%
Honor 5C
383 Points ∼10% +17%
ZTE Blade V7
195 Points ∼5% -40%
UMI Max
421 Points ∼11% +29%
UMI Super Euro Edition
413 Points ∼11% +27%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
127 Points ∼3% -61%
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points ∼56% +572%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
1293 Points ∼42%
Vernee Mars
1100 Points ∼36% -15%
Honor 5C
1418 Points ∼46% +10%
ZTE Blade V7
944 Points ∼31% -27%
UMI Max
1239 Points ∼40% -4%
UMI Super Euro Edition
1144 Points ∼37% -12%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
831 Points ∼27% -36%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
716 Points ∼23% -45%
Lenovo Moto Z
1828 Points ∼59% +41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
419 Points ∼5%
Vernee Mars
523 Points ∼7% +25%
Honor 5C
480 Points ∼6% +15%
ZTE Blade V7
245 Points ∼3% -42%
UMI Max
521 Points ∼7% +24%
UMI Super Euro Edition
523 Points ∼7% +25%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
172 Points ∼2% -59%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
42 Points ∼1% -90%
Lenovo Moto Z
3718 Points ∼48% +787%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
490 Points ∼10%
Vernee Mars
602 Points ∼12% +23%
Honor 5C
563 Points ∼11% +15%
ZTE Blade V7
293 Points ∼6% -40%
UMI Max
598 Points ∼12% +22%
UMI Super Euro Edition
595 Points ∼12% +21%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
209 Points ∼4% -57%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
53 Points ∼1% -89%
Lenovo Moto Z
3023 Points ∼61% +517%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
11973 Points ∼17%
Vernee Mars
10762 Points ∼15% -10%
Honor 5C
13588 Points ∼19% +13%
ZTE Blade V7
10430 Points ∼14% -13%
UMI Max
12239 Points ∼17% +2%
UMI Super Euro Edition
11654 Points ∼16% -3%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
9768 Points ∼14% -18%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
9256 Points ∼13% -23%
Lenovo Moto Z
20948 Points ∼29% +75%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
8718 Points ∼2%
Vernee Mars
10685 Points ∼2% +23%
Honor 5C
11319 Points ∼2% +30%
ZTE Blade V7
6170 Points ∼1% -29%
UMI Max
10612 Points ∼2% +22%
UMI Super Euro Edition
10567 Points ∼2% +21%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
4333 Points ∼1% -50%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
3858 Points ∼1% -56%
Lenovo Moto Z
26659 Points ∼6% +206%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
9279 Points ∼5%
Vernee Mars
10702 Points ∼5% +15%
Honor 5C
11755 Points ∼6% +27%
ZTE Blade V7
6786 Points ∼3% -27%
UMI Max
10942 Points ∼6% +18%
UMI Super Euro Edition
10791 Points ∼5% +16%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
4944 Points ∼3% -47%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4432 Points ∼2% -52%
Lenovo Moto Z
25135 Points ∼13% +171%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
14 fps ∼1%
Vernee Mars
17 fps ∼1% +21%
Honor 5C
19 fps ∼1% +36%
ZTE Blade V7
12 fps ∼1% -14%
UMI Max
17 fps ∼1% +21%
UMI Super Euro Edition
17 fps ∼1% +21%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
14 fps ∼1% 0%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
5.2 fps ∼0% -63%
Lenovo Moto Z
77 fps ∼6% +450%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
14 fps ∼3%
Vernee Mars
18 fps ∼4% +29%
Honor 5C
20 fps ∼4% +43%
ZTE Blade V7
12 fps ∼3% -14%
UMI Max
17 fps ∼4% +21%
UMI Super Euro Edition
18 fps ∼4% +29%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
8.4 fps ∼2% -40%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
9.6 fps ∼2% -31%
Lenovo Moto Z
53 fps ∼12% +279%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
5.5 fps ∼1%
Vernee Mars
7.1 fps ∼1% +29%
Honor 5C
7.9 fps ∼1% +44%
ZTE Blade V7
4.5 fps ∼1% -18%
UMI Max
7.1 fps ∼1% +29%
UMI Super Euro Edition
7.1 fps ∼1% +29%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
6 fps ∼1% +9%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
1.8 fps ∼0% -67%
Lenovo Moto Z
41 fps ∼8% +645%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
5.5 fps ∼2%
Vernee Mars
7.6 fps ∼2% +38%
Honor 5C
8.4 fps ∼2% +53%
ZTE Blade V7
4.5 fps ∼1% -18%
UMI Max
7.1 fps ∼2% +29%
UMI Super Euro Edition
7.5 fps ∼2% +36%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
3 fps ∼1% -45%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4.1 fps ∼1% -25%
Lenovo Moto Z
26 fps ∼7% +373%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
3.6 fps ∼1%
Vernee Mars
4.8 fps ∼1% +33%
Honor 5C
4.5 fps ∼1% +25%
ZTE Blade V7
2.9 fps ∼1% -19%
UMI Max
4.7 fps ∼1% +31%
UMI Super Euro Edition
4.7 fps ∼1% +31%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
4.4 fps ∼1% +22%
Lenovo Moto Z
27 fps ∼6% +650%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
3.6 fps ∼2%
Vernee Mars
5.1 fps ∼3% +42%
Honor 5C
4.9 fps ∼3% +36%
ZTE Blade V7
2.9 fps ∼2% -19%
UMI Max
4.7 fps ∼3% +31%
UMI Super Euro Edition
5.1 fps ∼3% +42%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
1.9 fps ∼1% -47%
Lenovo Moto Z
15 fps ∼9% +317%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
1.9 fps ∼1%
Vernee Mars
2.5 fps ∼1% +32%
Honor 5C
2.9 fps ∼1% +53%
UMI Max
2.5 fps ∼1% +32%
UMI Super Euro Edition
2.5 fps ∼1% +32%
Lenovo Moto Z
16 fps ∼5% +742%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
1.9 fps ∼0%
Vernee Mars
2.7 fps ∼0% +42%
Honor 5C
2.8 fps ∼0% +47%
UMI Max
2.5 fps ∼0% +32%
UMI Super Euro Edition
2.6 fps ∼0% +37%
Lenovo Moto Z
9.8 fps ∼0% +416%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
4036 Points ∼47%
Vernee Mars
4554 Points ∼53% +13%
Honor 5C
5120 Points ∼60% +27%
ZTE Blade V7
3947 Points ∼46% -2%
UMI Max
4485 Points ∼52% +11%
UMI Super Euro Edition
4596 Points ∼54% +14%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
3813 Points ∼45% -6%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4283 Points ∼50% +6%
Lenovo Moto Z
7637 Points ∼89% +89%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
10 Points ∼1%
Vernee Mars
10 Points ∼1% 0%
Honor 5C
707 Points ∼42% +6970%
ZTE Blade V7
10 Points ∼1% 0%
UMI Max
10 Points ∼1% 0%
UMI Super Euro Edition
771 Points ∼45% +7610%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
10 Points ∼1% 0%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
551 Points ∼32% +5410%
Lenovo Moto Z
959 Points ∼57% +9490%
Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
507 Points ∼5%
Vernee Mars
665 Points ∼7% +31%
Honor 5C
814 Points ∼9% +61%
ZTE Blade V7
430 Points ∼5% -15%
UMI Max
666 Points ∼7% +31%
UMI Super Euro Edition
666 Points ∼7% +31%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
286 Points ∼3% -44%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
313 Points ∼3% -38%
Lenovo Moto Z
4321 Points ∼47% +752%
Memory (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
976 Points ∼22%
Vernee Mars
1005 Points ∼23% +3%
Honor 5C
1504 Points ∼34% +54%
ZTE Blade V7
790 Points ∼18% -19%
UMI Max
998 Points ∼23% +2%
UMI Super Euro Edition
1052 Points ∼24% +8%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
450 Points ∼10% -54%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
741 Points ∼17% -24%
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points ∼50% +124%
System (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
2141 Points ∼21%
Vernee Mars
2291 Points ∼22% +7%
Honor 5C
2600 Points ∼25% +21%
ZTE Blade V7
1188 Points ∼12% -45%
UMI Max
2123 Points ∼21% -1%
UMI Super Euro Edition
2187 Points ∼21% +2%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
1090 Points ∼11% -49%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
1035 Points ∼10% -52%
Lenovo Moto Z
3398 Points ∼33% +59%
Overall (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
318 Points ∼8%
Vernee Mars
348 Points ∼9% +9%
Honor 5C
1225 Points ∼32% +285%
ZTE Blade V7
249 Points ∼7% -22%
UMI Max
341 Points ∼9% +7%
UMI Super Euro Edition
1043 Points ∼28% +228%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
192 Points ∼5% -40%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
603 Points ∼16% +90%
Lenovo Moto Z
2356 Points ∼62% +641%
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
3845 Points ∼8%
Vernee Mars
4073 Points ∼8% +6%
Honor 5C
4188 Points ∼8% +9%
ZTE Blade V7
2689 Points ∼5% -30%
UMI Max
4231 Points ∼9% +10%
UMI Super Euro Edition
4117 Points ∼8% +7%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
2697 Points ∼5% -30%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2773 Points ∼6% -28%
Lenovo Moto Z
7771 Points ∼16% +102%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
24.997 Points ∼0%
Vernee Mars
27.099 Points ∼0% +8%
Honor 5C
27.934 Points ∼0% +12%
ZTE Blade V7
18.19 Points ∼0% -27%
UMI Max
25.502 Points ∼0% +2%
UMI Super Euro Edition
26.211 Points ∼0% +5%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
18.028 Points ∼0% -28%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
17.094 Points ∼0% -32%
Lenovo Moto Z
47.5 Points ∼0% +90%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
9703.5 ms * ∼16%
Vernee Mars
9376.1 ms * ∼16% +3%
Honor 5C
9111.2 ms * ∼15% +6%
ZTE Blade V7
13761.1 ms * ∼23% -42%
UMI Max
9795.6 ms * ∼16% -1%
UMI Super Euro Edition
9410.2 ms * ∼16% +3%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
12910 ms * ∼22% -33%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
12952.9 ms * ∼22% -33%
Lenovo Moto Z
3154.7 ms * ∼5% +67%

Leyenda

 
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Vernee Mars Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 5C HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V7 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
UMI Max Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
UMI Super Euro Edition Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Acer Liquid Zest Plus Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto G4 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.
 38.5 °C38.2 °C36.6 °C 
 39.4 °C35.6 °C35.7 °C 
 38.7 °C35.2 °C34.2 °C 
Máximo: 39.4 °C
Médio: 36.9 °C
33.5 °C39.7 °C39.1 °C
33.1 °C35.4 °C36.2 °C
32 °C33.8 °C34.9 °C
Máximo: 39.7 °C
Médio: 35.3 °C
Conector de corriente  33 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.637.12525.432.83125.337.64032.937.95033.641.36331.633.78028.427.91002724.312520.825.91602233.620021.341.725020.85131521.259.640019.463.850019.566.463017.771.380017.972.8100017.876.8125017.377.4160017.478200016.776.1250017.270.3315018.271.3400017.969.4500017.670.2630017.769.8800017.869.71000017.972.41250018.167.91600018.254.1SPL3085.6N1.363.1median 17.9Alcatel One Touch Pop 4Smedian 69.7Delta1.39.333.63732.433.638.339.631.338.33038.431.73031.338.82631.335.840.839.435.831.632.636.231.626.12728.626.127.825.325.427.825.124.221.325.124.225.423.324.222.921.622.522.922.219.222.422.224.619.821.324.631.620.518.431.645.628.917.545.658.441.817.558.467.752.117.267.771.956.316.871.973.457.117.373.472.156.217.472.173.856.416.673.873.957.317.373.97659.217.67676.859.717.676.874.156.717.774.172.153.717.472.17152.517.77174.455.617.974.473.754.718.173.761.542.118.161.585.368.329.885.357.320.51.357.3median 71ZTE Blade V7median 52.5median 17.7median 7117.914.11.617.932.537.232.432.532.733.631.332.723.531.231.723.530.833.52630.841.139.139.441.132.933.436.232.928.930.728.628.926.425.825.426.427.324.821.327.328.325.823.328.332.62422.532.638.624.722.438.646.432.421.346.454.537.518.454.55942.917.55959.549.517.559.562.750.117.262.766.952.516.866.971.155.517.371.175.358.217.475.379.162.916.679.180.463.817.380.479.162.217.679.177.660.117.677.675.357.417.775.374.657.417.474.674.356.517.774.372.354.517.972.364.145.818.164.146.227.918.146.287.971.229.887.964.123.81.364.1median 64.1Honor 5Cmedian 50.1median 17.7median 64.114.612.21.614.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.63 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 0.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

ZTE Blade V7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.33 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 46.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 11% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Honor 5C audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.18 / 0.32 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.93 / 1.41 / 2.36 Watt
Carga midlight 3.79 / 5.39 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
2960 mAh
Vernee Mars
3000 mAh
Honor 5C
3000 mAh
ZTE Blade V7
2540 mAh
UMI Max
4000 mAh
UMI Super Euro Edition
4000 mAh
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
5000 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2800 mAh
Power Consumption
-10%
-4%
18%
16%
-23%
0%
17%
Idle Minimum *
0.93
1.02
-10%
0.89
4%
0.73
22%
1.02
-10%
0.84
10%
0.83
11%
0.68
27%
Idle Average *
1.41
1.69
-20%
2.07
-47%
0.92
35%
1.53
-9%
1.94
-38%
2.06
-46%
1.58
-12%
Idle Maximum *
2.36
1.82
23%
2.15
9%
0.93
61%
1.62
31%
2.07
12%
2.08
12%
1.61
32%
Load Average *
3.79
4.39
-16%
3.46
9%
4.47
-18%
2.91
23%
5.88
-55%
3.53
7%
3.36
11%
Load Maximum *
5.39
6.79
-26%
5.18
4%
5.96
-11%
2.93
46%
7.67
-42%
4.49
17%
3.91
27%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Navegando con WLAN v1.3
8h 51min
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
2960 mAh
Vernee Mars
3000 mAh
Honor 5C
3000 mAh
ZTE Blade V7
2540 mAh
UMI Max
4000 mAh
UMI Super Euro Edition
4000 mAh
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
5000 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2800 mAh
Duración de Batería
WiFi v1.3
531
427
-20%
584
10%
519
-2%
588
11%
638
20%
815
53%
630
19%

Pro

+ decente aguante de bateria
+ panel IPS de alto contraste
+ 1080p
+ dual-SIM + ranura de tarjeta SD
+ altavoz

Contra

- calidad de la carcasa
- brillo de pantalla
- GPS
- rendimiento mejorable
- almacenamiento eMMC lento
- sólo 2 GB de RAM
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Alcatel Alemania.
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Alcatel Alemania.

El Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S es un dispositivo bien construido de gama media con una configuración decente. Nos gustó particularmente el altavoz, que es uno de los mejores de este segmento de precios. En general, el Alcatel no convence por completo debido a problemas en el uso diario.

La mayoría de controles físicos están bien hechos, pero su posición  (botón de encendido) es incómoda de usar con una mano. El panel IPS es de alta resolución, muy brillante, y tiene un alto contraste - pero en un fondo de blanco puro solamente. El brillo de la pantalla es claramente inferior en la práctica, lo que hace necesiario en ocasiones usar el brillo máximo del LCD en interiores - su alto contraste, empero, se mantiene. Aunque el rendimiento del SoC MediaTek es mayormente atractivo en las pruebas, su rendimiento de sistema subjetivo no está a la par con los rivales. Desbloquear el dispositivo por huella digital también podria ser una buena característica, pero la mala tasa de indetificación del lector de huellas en el Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S no ofrece un auténtico valor añadido en el uso diario.

El Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S es un smartphone gama media sólido que no está bien pensado en algunos aspectos.

 

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S - 12/05/2016 v5.1
Marcus Herbrich

Acabado
77%
Teclado
61 / 75 → 82%
Ratón
87%
Conectividad
40 / 60 → 66%
Peso
92%
Battería
91%
Pantalla
81%
Rendimiento de juegos
20 / 63 → 31%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
35 / 70 → 49%
Temperatura
90%
Ruido
100%
Audio
65 / 91 → 71%
Cámara
65%
Médio
70%
81%
Smartphone - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Smartphone Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
Marcus Herbrich, 2016-12-14 (Update: 2016-12-14)