Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del Smartphone UMi Max

Marcus Herbrich (traducido por Francisco García), 11/19/2016

USB Type-C a un precio básico. Por un PVP de 150 Euros, los chinos de UMi ofrecen un paquete interesante: hardware potente, batería de 4,000 mAh, y un moderno puerto USB Type-C.

UMI Max
Procesador
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 2 GHz
Adaptador gráfico
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Memoría
3072 MB 
, LPDDR3
pantalla
5.5 pulgadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixels 401 PPI, capacitiva multitáctil, Sharp, IPS, 2.5D, Corning Gorilla Glas 3, lustroso: si
Disco duro
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, Samsung, 10.4 GB libre
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, Audio Conexiones: clavija headset 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD hasta 256 GB, 1 Lector de Huellas Digitales, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: G, Glonass, P, L, Acelerómetro, Brújula, Giroscopio, Hall, Smart-Key, OTG, Status-LED, Miracast
Equipamento de red
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM: 850(B5)/900(B8)/1800(B3)/1900(B2) || WCDMA: 850(B5)/900(B8)/1900(B2)/2100(B1) | LTE FDD: 2100(B1)/1800(B3)/2600(B7)/800(B20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 8.5 x 150.8 x 75
Battería
4000 mAh Litio-Ion, Duración de la Batería (según el fabricante): 360 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix Cámara Panasonic, flash dual
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix GalaxyCore GC5005
Características adicionales
Altavoces: Mono, Teclado: virtual, Luz de Teclado: si, adaptador modular de corriente, cable USB, UMi UI, 12 Meses Garantía, SAR n.b., fanless
Peso
199 g, Suministro de Electricidad: 27 g
Precio
150 Euros

 

Size comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
UMI Max
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
103 MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
UMI Max
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
98.8 MBit/s ∼100%
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Moto Z
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
491 MBit/s ∼100%
UMI Super Euro Edition
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
109 MBit/s ∼22%
Blackview R7
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
102 MBit/s ∼21%
Honor 5C
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.8 MBit/s ∼10%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Moto Z
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
360 MBit/s ∼100%
UMI Super Euro Edition
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
108 MBit/s ∼30%
Blackview R7
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
79.4 MBit/s ∼22%
Honor 5C
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
58.3 MBit/s ∼16%
GPS-Test UMi Max
GPS-Test UMi Max
GPS-Test UMi Max
GPS-Test Garmin Edge 500
GPS-Test Garmin Edge 500
GPS-Test Garmin Edge 500

Comparación de Imágenes

Elige una escena y navega dentro de la primera imagen. Un click cambia el nivel de zoom. Un click en la imagen aumentada abre la original en una ventana nueva. La primera imagen muestra la fotografía escalada del dispositivo de pruebas.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
484
cd/m²
503
cd/m²
537
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
522
cd/m²
532
cd/m²
463
cd/m²
463
cd/m²
500
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 537 cd/m² Médio: 498.3 cd/m² Minimum: 20.26 cd/m²
iluminación: 86 %
Brillo con batería: 522 cd/m²
Contraste: 2270:1 (Negro: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.9 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 9.2 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.38
UMI Max
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
UMI Touch
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Coolpad Torino S
IPS, 1280x720, 4.7
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Blackview R7
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Acer Liquid Z630S
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Leagoo Shark 1
IPS, 1920x1080, 6
UMI Super Euro Edition
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Honor 5C
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Screen
-31%
-26%
-7%
-57%
-4%
-61%
0%
-22%
Brightness
498
415
-17%
358
-28%
302
-39%
526
6%
345
-31%
465
-7%
410
-18%
498
0%
Brightness Distribution
86
91
6%
87
1%
79
-8%
91
6%
84
-2%
82
-5%
85
-1%
93
8%
Black Level *
0.23
0.54
-135%
0.45
-96%
0.15
35%
0.64
-178%
0.27
-17%
0.9
-291%
0.31
-35%
0.49
-113%
Contrast
2270
785
-65%
800
-65%
2080
-8%
863
-62%
1296
-43%
523
-77%
1348
-41%
1051
-54%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.9
6.9
-0%
6.8
1%
8.2
-19%
11
-59%
4.7
32%
7.1
-3%
4.4
36%
6.2
10%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
9.2
6.8
26%
6.2
33%
9.2
-0%
14.3
-55%
5.6
39%
7.5
18%
3.6
61%
7.4
20%
Gamma
2.38 101%
1.99 121%
2.14 112%
2.29 105%
2.21 109%
1.84 130%
2.23 108%
2.36 102%
2.28 105%
CCT
8687 75%
8131 80%
7975 82%
9017 72%
12996 50%
6795 96%
8261 79%
6993 93%
8664 75%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
36 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 15 ms subida
↘ 21 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 89 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (26.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
40 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 17 ms subida
↘ 23 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 41 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (43.4 ms).

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 58 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 5054 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max
18.07 MB/s ∼21%
UMI Touch
21.02 MB/s ∼24% +16%
Coolpad Torino S
16.54 MB/s ∼19% -8%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
12.62 MB/s ∼14% -30%
Blackview R7
11.87 MB/s ∼14% -34%
UMI Super Euro Edition
17.88 MB/s ∼21% -1%
Honor 5C
24.21 MB/s ∼28% +34%
Lenovo Moto Z
45.64 MB/s ∼52% +153%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max
36.64 MB/s ∼38%
UMI Touch
42.92 MB/s ∼44% +17%
Coolpad Torino S
25.79 MB/s ∼27% -30%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
22.77 MB/s ∼24% -38%
Blackview R7
15.56 MB/s ∼16% -58%
UMI Super Euro Edition
36.22 MB/s ∼38% -1%
Honor 5C
51.93 MB/s ∼54% +42%
Lenovo Moto Z
78.51 MB/s ∼81% +114%
Random Write 4KB (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max
10.91 MB/s ∼7%
UMI Touch
14.63 MB/s ∼10% +34%
Coolpad Torino S
6.94 MB/s ∼5% -36%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
8.26 MB/s ∼5% -24%
Blackview R7
11.4 MB/s ∼7% +4%
Acer Liquid Z630S
5.82 MB/s ∼4% -47%
Leagoo Shark 1
6.4 MB/s ∼4% -41%
UMI Super Euro Edition
11.88 MB/s ∼8% +9%
Honor 5C
15.7 MB/s ∼10% +44%
Lenovo Moto Z
74.93 MB/s ∼49% +587%
Random Read 4KB (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max
26.66 MB/s ∼15%
UMI Touch
19.88 MB/s ∼11% -25%
Coolpad Torino S
18.34 MB/s ∼11% -31%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
18.24 MB/s ∼11% -32%
Blackview R7
28.02 MB/s ∼16% +5%
Acer Liquid Z630S
28.43 MB/s ∼16% +7%
Leagoo Shark 1
29.6 MB/s ∼17% +11%
UMI Super Euro Edition
28.17 MB/s ∼16% +6%
Honor 5C
61.7 MB/s ∼36% +131%
Lenovo Moto Z
117.15 MB/s ∼68% +339%
Sequential Write 256KB (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max
69.5 MB/s ∼34%
UMI Touch
72.47 MB/s ∼35% +4%
Coolpad Torino S
41.81 MB/s ∼20% -40%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
70.33 MB/s ∼34% +1%
Blackview R7
122.67 MB/s ∼59% +77%
Acer Liquid Z630S
67.7 MB/s ∼33% -3%
Leagoo Shark 1
39.6 MB/s ∼19% -43%
UMI Super Euro Edition
126.95 MB/s ∼62% +83%
Honor 5C
75.5 MB/s ∼37% +9%
Lenovo Moto Z
168.32 MB/s ∼82% +142%
Sequential Read 256KB (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max
257.9 MB/s ∼33%
UMI Touch
219.3 MB/s ∼28% -15%
Coolpad Torino S
140.34 MB/s ∼18% -46%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
187.34 MB/s ∼24% -27%
Blackview R7
247.58 MB/s ∼31% -4%
Acer Liquid Z630S
249.01 MB/s ∼31% -3%
Leagoo Shark 1
264.1 MB/s ∼33% +2%
UMI Super Euro Edition
257.8 MB/s ∼33% 0%
Honor 5C
263 MB/s ∼33% +2%
Lenovo Moto Z
439.66 MB/s ∼55% +70%
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max
49057 Points ∼22%
UMI Touch
38617 Points ∼17% -21%
Coolpad Torino S
22766 Points ∼10% -54%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
23822 Points ∼10% -51%
Blackview R7
50572 Points ∼22% +3%
Acer Liquid Z630S
35585 Points ∼16% -27%
Leagoo Shark 1
34261 Points ∼15% -30%
UMI Super Euro Edition
50072 Points ∼22% +2%
Honor 5C
53143 Points ∼23% +8%
Lenovo Moto Z
129197 Points ∼57% +163%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
UMI Touch
2798 Points ∼7%
Coolpad Torino S
1511 Points ∼4%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1147 Points ∼3%
Honor 5C
3914 Points ∼10%
Lenovo Moto Z
5450 Points ∼14%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
UMI Touch
626 Points ∼13%
Coolpad Torino S
494 Points ∼10%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
404 Points ∼8%
Honor 5C
906 Points ∼19%
Lenovo Moto Z
2080 Points ∼44%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max
2701 Points ∼10%
Blackview R7
2851 Points ∼10% +6%
UMI Super Euro Edition
2818 Points ∼10% +4%
Lenovo Moto Z
3946 Points ∼14% +46%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max
734 Points ∼13%
Blackview R7
728 Points ∼13% -1%
UMI Super Euro Edition
727 Points ∼13% -1%
Lenovo Moto Z
1480 Points ∼26% +102%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max
1239 Points ∼42%
UMI Touch
1045 Points ∼36% -16%
Coolpad Torino S
735 Points ∼25% -41%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
618 Points ∼21% -50%
Blackview R7
1155 Points ∼40% -7%
Acer Liquid Z630S
1113 Points ∼38% -10%
Leagoo Shark 1
890 Points ∼30% -28%
UMI Super Euro Edition
1144 Points ∼39% -8%
Honor 5C
1418 Points ∼49% +14%
Lenovo Moto Z
1828 Points ∼63% +48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max
521 Points ∼7%
UMI Touch
241 Points ∼3% -54%
Coolpad Torino S
41 Points ∼1% -92%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
101 Points ∼1% -81%
Blackview R7
518 Points ∼7% -1%
Acer Liquid Z630S
229 Points ∼3% -56%
Leagoo Shark 1
232 Points ∼3% -55%
UMI Super Euro Edition
523 Points ∼7% 0%
Honor 5C
480 Points ∼6% -8%
Lenovo Moto Z
3718 Points ∼48% +614%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max
598 Points ∼12%
UMI Touch
291 Points ∼6% -51%
Coolpad Torino S
52 Points ∼1% -91%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
124 Points ∼2% -79%
Blackview R7
590 Points ∼12% -1%
Acer Liquid Z630S
278 Points ∼6% -54%
Leagoo Shark 1
278 Points ∼6% -54%
UMI Super Euro Edition
595 Points ∼12% -1%
Honor 5C
563 Points ∼11% -6%
Lenovo Moto Z
3023 Points ∼61% +406%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max
12239 Points ∼18%
UMI Touch
10368 Points ∼15% -15%
Coolpad Torino S
9205 Points ∼13% -25%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
7026 Points ∼10% -43%
Blackview R7
12585 Points ∼18% +3%
Acer Liquid Z630S
10508 Points ∼15% -14%
Leagoo Shark 1
10325 Points ∼15% -16%
UMI Super Euro Edition
11654 Points ∼17% -5%
Honor 5C
13588 Points ∼20% +11%
Lenovo Moto Z
20948 Points ∼30% +71%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max
10612 Points ∼2%
UMI Touch
6186 Points ∼1% -42%
Coolpad Torino S
3858 Points ∼1% -64%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2645 Points ∼1% -75%
Blackview R7
10334 Points ∼2% -3%
Acer Liquid Z630S
6250 Points ∼1% -41%
Leagoo Shark 1
4920 Points ∼1% -54%
UMI Super Euro Edition
10567 Points ∼2% 0%
Honor 5C
11319 Points ∼2% +7%
Lenovo Moto Z
26659 Points ∼6% +151%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max
10942 Points ∼6%
UMI Touch
6795 Points ∼3% -38%
Coolpad Torino S
4430 Points ∼2% -60%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
3070 Points ∼2% -72%
Blackview R7
10762 Points ∼5% -2%
Acer Liquid Z630S
6868 Points ∼3% -37%
Leagoo Shark 1
5568 Points ∼3% -49%
UMI Super Euro Edition
10791 Points ∼5% -1%
Honor 5C
11755 Points ∼6% +7%
Lenovo Moto Z
25135 Points ∼13% +130%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max
17 fps ∼1%
UMI Touch
12 fps ∼1% -29%
Coolpad Torino S
9.8 fps ∼1% -42%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
4.9 fps ∼0% -71%
Blackview R7
17 fps ∼1% 0%
Acer Liquid Z630S
12 fps ∼1% -29%
Leagoo Shark 1
8.9 fps ∼1% -48%
UMI Super Euro Edition
17 fps ∼1% 0%
Honor 5C
19 fps ∼1% +12%
Lenovo Moto Z
77 fps ∼6% +353%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max
17 fps ∼4%
UMI Touch
12 fps ∼3% -29%
Coolpad Torino S
5.3 fps ∼1% -69%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
8.2 fps ∼2% -52%
Blackview R7
17 fps ∼4% 0%
Acer Liquid Z630S
21 fps ∼5% +24%
Leagoo Shark 1
8.7 fps ∼2% -49%
UMI Super Euro Edition
18 fps ∼4% +6%
Honor 5C
20 fps ∼4% +18%
Lenovo Moto Z
53 fps ∼12% +212%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max
7.1 fps ∼1%
UMI Touch
4.5 fps ∼1% -37%
Coolpad Torino S
4.3 fps ∼1% -39%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
3.4 fps ∼1% -52%
Blackview R7
4.7 fps ∼1% -34%
Acer Liquid Z630S
4.2 fps ∼1% -41%
Leagoo Shark 1
4.2 fps ∼1% -41%
UMI Super Euro Edition
7.1 fps ∼1% 0%
Honor 5C
7.9 fps ∼1% +11%
Lenovo Moto Z
41 fps ∼8% +477%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max
7.1 fps ∼3%
UMI Touch
4.5 fps ∼2% -37%
Coolpad Torino S
1.8 fps ∼1% -75%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1.8 fps ∼1% -75%
Blackview R7
4.7 fps ∼2% -34%
Acer Liquid Z630S
9 fps ∼4% +27%
Leagoo Shark 1
3.9 fps ∼2% -45%
UMI Super Euro Edition
7.5 fps ∼3% +6%
Honor 5C
8.4 fps ∼4% +18%
Lenovo Moto Z
26 fps ∼11% +266%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max
4.7 fps ∼1%
UMI Touch
2.9 fps ∼1% -38%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2.5 fps ∼1% -47%
Blackview R7
2.5 fps ∼1% -47%
Leagoo Shark 1
2.5 fps ∼1% -47%
UMI Super Euro Edition
4.7 fps ∼1% 0%
Honor 5C
4.5 fps ∼1% -4%
Lenovo Moto Z
27 fps ∼6% +474%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max
4.7 fps ∼3%
UMI Touch
2.9 fps ∼2% -38%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1.2 fps ∼1% -74%
Blackview R7
2.5 fps ∼1% -47%
Leagoo Shark 1
2.2 fps ∼1% -53%
UMI Super Euro Edition
5.1 fps ∼3% +9%
Honor 5C
4.9 fps ∼3% +4%
Lenovo Moto Z
15 fps ∼9% +219%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max
4485 Points ∼54%
UMI Touch
3787 Points ∼46% -16%
Coolpad Torino S
3932 Points ∼47% -12%
Blackview R7
4364 Points ∼53% -3%
Acer Liquid Z630S
3814 Points ∼46% -15%
Leagoo Shark 1
3398 Points ∼41% -24%
UMI Super Euro Edition
4596 Points ∼55% +2%
Honor 5C
5120 Points ∼62% +14%
Lenovo Moto Z
7637 Points ∼92% +70%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max
10 Points ∼1%
UMI Touch
576 Points ∼37% +5660%
Coolpad Torino S
599 Points ∼39% +5890%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
592 Points ∼38% +5820%
Blackview R7
10 Points ∼1% 0%
Acer Liquid Z630S
627 Points ∼41% +6170%
Leagoo Shark 1
611 Points ∼40% +6010%
UMI Super Euro Edition
771 Points ∼50% +7610%
Honor 5C
707 Points ∼46% +6970%
Lenovo Moto Z
959 Points ∼62% +9490%
Graphics (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max
666 Points ∼8%
UMI Touch
429 Points ∼5% -36%
Coolpad Torino S
321 Points ∼4% -52%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
174 Points ∼2% -74%
Blackview R7
655 Points ∼8% -2%
Acer Liquid Z630S
416 Points ∼5% -38%
Leagoo Shark 1
418 Points ∼5% -37%
UMI Super Euro Edition
666 Points ∼8% 0%
Honor 5C
814 Points ∼9% +22%
Lenovo Moto Z
4321 Points ∼50% +549%
Memory (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max
998 Points ∼23%
UMI Touch
787 Points ∼18% -21%
Coolpad Torino S
607 Points ∼14% -39%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
487 Points ∼11% -51%
Blackview R7
1030 Points ∼24% +3%
Acer Liquid Z630S
540 Points ∼13% -46%
Leagoo Shark 1
515 Points ∼12% -48%
UMI Super Euro Edition
1052 Points ∼25% +5%
Honor 5C
1504 Points ∼35% +51%
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points ∼51% +119%
System (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max
2123 Points ∼32%
UMI Touch
1343 Points ∼20% -37%
Coolpad Torino S
1102 Points ∼17% -48%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
801 Points ∼12% -62%
Blackview R7
1971 Points ∼30% -7%
Acer Liquid Z630S
1614 Points ∼25% -24%
Leagoo Shark 1
1195 Points ∼18% -44%
UMI Super Euro Edition
2187 Points ∼33% +3%
Honor 5C
2600 Points ∼40% +22%
Lenovo Moto Z
3398 Points ∼52% +60%
Overall (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max
341 Points ∼9%
UMI Touch
717 Points ∼19% +110%
Coolpad Torino S
602 Points ∼16% +77%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
448 Points ∼12% +31%
Blackview R7
338 Points ∼9% -1%
Acer Liquid Z630S
691 Points ∼19% +103%
Leagoo Shark 1
597 Points ∼16% +75%
UMI Super Euro Edition
1043 Points ∼28% +206%
Honor 5C
1225 Points ∼33% +259%
Lenovo Moto Z
2356 Points ∼64% +591%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max
25.502 Points ∼8%
UMI Touch
17.614 Points ∼5% -31%
Coolpad Torino S
14.453 Points ∼4% -43%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
12.729 Points ∼4% -50%
Blackview R7
25.349 Points ∼8% -1%
Acer Liquid Z630S
19.028 Points ∼6% -25%
Leagoo Shark 1
17.242 Points ∼5% -32%
UMI Super Euro Edition
26.211 Points ∼8% +3%
Honor 5C
27.934 Points ∼8% +10%
Lenovo Moto Z
47.5 Points ∼14% +86%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max
9795.6 ms * ∼16%
UMI Touch
13953 ms * ∼23% -42%
Coolpad Torino S
15784.4 ms * ∼27% -61%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
19234.4 ms * ∼32% -96%
Blackview R7
9748.3 ms * ∼16% -0%
Acer Liquid Z630S
12876 ms * ∼22% -31%
Leagoo Shark 1
14787.9 ms * ∼25% -51%
UMI Super Euro Edition
9410.2 ms * ∼16% +4%
Honor 5C
9111.2 ms * ∼15% +7%
Lenovo Moto Z
3154.7 ms * ∼5% +68%
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max
4231 Points ∼9%
UMI Touch
2562 Points ∼5% -39%
Coolpad Torino S
2364 Points ∼5% -44%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1910 Points ∼4% -55%
Blackview R7
3885 Points ∼8% -8%
Acer Liquid Z630S
2855 Points ∼6% -33%
Leagoo Shark 1
2992 Points ∼6% -29%
UMI Super Euro Edition
4117 Points ∼8% -3%
Honor 5C
4188 Points ∼8% -1%
Lenovo Moto Z
7771 Points ∼16% +84%

Leyenda

 
UMI Max Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
UMI Touch Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Coolpad Torino S Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V7 Lite Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Blackview R7 Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Acer Liquid Z630S Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Leagoo Shark 1 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
UMI Super Euro Edition Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 5C HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.
 40.2 °C38.8 °C38.2 °C 
 38.1 °C38.1 °C38.3 °C 
 37.6 °C37.8 °C38.2 °C 
Máximo: 40.2 °C
Médio: 38.4 °C
33.8 °C35.6 °C36.3 °C
33.9 °C35.3 °C35.6 °C
33.8 °C35.4 °C35.7 °C
Máximo: 36.3 °C
Médio: 35 °C
Conector de corriente  38.7 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.644.52525.435.23125.336.54032.932.15033.641.26331.631.68028.435.31002727.512520.8241602226.120021.325.225020.829.431521.239.140019.444.150019.552.863017.759.980017.965.5100017.869.4125017.370.3160017.470.1200016.769.1250017.268.4315018.272.6400017.976.9500017.668.9630017.765.6800017.869.21000017.964.41250018.152.71600018.249.2SPL3082.4N1.348.5median 17.9UMI Maxmedian 64.4Delta1.314.224.323.124.324.322.32122.722.322.720.322.622.723.723.229.623.721.221.922.221.219.119.32019.117.617.118.517.620.120.12120.130.630.931.930.616.71616.516.718.218.317.318.217.817.618.317.81719.517.31719.529.216.419.527.13917.827.130.643.414.830.63850.915.73842.35616.442.345.66015.845.647.861.713.647.850.963.114.850.950.26312.650.252.264.711.252.252.86510.952.853.4669.753.452.4659.652.448.6619.748.64153.69.44134.147.69.434.129.743.79.429.761.774.426.161.712.828.50.812.8median 38Blackview R7median 50.9median 14.8median 3814.216.82.814.236.331.432.436.334.429.331.334.431.632.231.731.635.134.12635.138.134.939.438.13132.536.23126.427.228.626.427.527.725.427.527.531.121.327.526.827.523.326.830.627.122.530.638.429.922.438.446.432.921.346.45240.318.45260.847.817.560.865.85517.565.870.661.817.270.67463.816.87473.96317.373.968.957.917.468.968.857.416.668.868.857.717.368.868.65717.668.668.255.217.668.268.453.817.768.469.85517.469.874.359.417.774.375.160.417.975.169.954.818.169.966.35118.166.382.670.729.882.653.425.61.353.4median 68.4ZTE Blade V7 Litemedian 55median 17.7median 68.410.98.91.610.9hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
UMI Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.43 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 88% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Blackview R7 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.8% lower than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (42.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 97% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

ZTE Blade V7 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.62 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.12 / 0.4 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.02 / 1.53 / 1.62 Watt
Carga midlight 2.91 / 2.93 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
UMI Max
4000 mAh
UMI Touch
4000 mAh
Coolpad Torino S
1800 mAh
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2500 mAh
Blackview R7
3000 mAh
Acer Liquid Z630S
4000 mAh
Leagoo Shark 1
6300 mAh
UMI Super Euro Edition
4000 mAh
Honor 5C
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
-36%
-19%
6%
-122%
-65%
-96%
-60%
-30%
Idle Minimum *
1.02
0.89
13%
0.68
33%
0.63
38%
1.83
-79%
1.82
-78%
0.59
42%
0.84
18%
0.89
13%
Idle Average *
1.53
2
-31%
2.2
-44%
1.37
10%
3.21
-110%
2.35
-54%
3.22
-110%
1.94
-27%
2.07
-35%
Idle Maximum *
1.62
2.1
-30%
2.26
-40%
1.71
-6%
3.45
-113%
2.6
-60%
3.45
-113%
2.07
-28%
2.15
-33%
Load Average *
2.91
3.87
-33%
3.47
-19%
2.82
3%
5.67
-95%
3.69
-27%
6.93
-138%
5.88
-102%
3.46
-19%
Load Maximum *
2.93
5.79
-98%
3.71
-27%
3.36
-15%
9.16
-213%
5.98
-104%
7.59
-159%
7.67
-162%
5.18
-77%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Navegando con WLAN v1.3
9h 48min
UMI Max
4000 mAh
UMI Touch
4000 mAh
Coolpad Torino S
1800 mAh
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2500 mAh
Blackview R7
3000 mAh
Acer Liquid Z630S
4000 mAh
Leagoo Shark 1
6300 mAh
UMI Super Euro Edition
4000 mAh
Honor 5C
3000 mAh
Duración de Batería
WiFi v1.3
588
553
-6%
397
-32%
517
-12%
412
-30%
681
16%
542
-8%
638
9%
584
-1%

Pro

+ panel IPS brillante de alto contraste
+ 1080p
+ Unibody de aluminio
+ Smart Key
+ bajo consumo de energía / calor emitido
+ muchísimo aguante de batería
+ LTE Band 20
+ 3 GB de RAM
+ WLAN Dual-Band
+ lector de huellas
+ buen rendimiento y memoria eMMC más rápida (para la categoría de precios)

Contra

- pesado
- defectos de manufactura
- GPS ligeramente impreciso
- fotos borrosas
- tiempo de carga
UMi Max. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Gearbest.com
UMi Max. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Gearbest.com

Nuestros tests muestran que el UMi Max es un buen dispositivo básico con algunos fallos de manufactura. Para su precio podemos aceptar algunas debilidades, tales como un GPS impreciso, un peso relativamente alto, y largos tiempos de carga de la cámara. Los valores de acceso de la memoria eMMC interna y el lector de tarjetas SD son bastante bajos, lo que es típico para un móvil básico.

Por otro lado, el UMi Max puntúa con su brillante panel IPS de alta resolución que ofrece muy buen contraste. Es raro encontrar un display tan bueno a este precio. Además, el rendimiento y la conectividad son buenísimas. El consumo de energía es bajo y el teléfono se puede cargar rápidamente.

Si un display de 5.5" y un peso de 199 gramos no suponen un problema, podemos recomendar el UMi Max como dispositivo básico. 

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

UMI Max - 11/07/2016 v5.1
Marcus Herbrich

Acabado
82%
Teclado
66 / 75 → 88%
Ratón
91%
Conectividad
44 / 60 → 74%
Peso
88%
Battería
92%
Pantalla
82%
Rendimiento de juegos
25 / 63 → 39%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
41 / 70 → 58%
Temperatura
89%
Ruido
100%
Audio
54 / 91 → 59%
Cámara
58%
Médio
70%
81%
Smartphone - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Smartphone UMi Max
Marcus Herbrich, 2016-11-19 (Update: 2016-11-19)