Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del tablet Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite 8

Sam Medley (traducido por Francisco García), 10/02/2017

Mini Me(diaPad). La variante de 8" de la MediaPad M3 Lite ha pulido y lustrado el ecosistema de Android. A pesar de sus especificaciones de gama media, el M3 Lite demuestra ser una máquina de medios capaz. ¿Es este el tablet compacto y asequible a conseguir?

Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 (MediaPad Serie)
Procesador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
Adaptador gráfico
Qualcomm Adreno 505
Memoría
3072 MB 
pantalla
8 pulgadas 16:10, 1920x1200 pixels 283 PPI, 10-point Multitouch, IPS, IPS, lustroso: si
Disco duro
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, Audio Conexiones: Combination , 1 Lector de Huellas Digitales, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acceleration, gyroscope, compass, USB-OTG
Equipamento de red
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.0, GPS
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 7.5 x 213.3 x 123.3
Battería
18.6 Wh, 4800 mAh Litio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix
Características adicionales
Altavoces: Dual stereo speakers, Teclado: Virtual, Charger, USB-A to micro USB cable, SIM tool, EMUI 5.1, 12 Meses Garantía, fanless
Peso
310 g
Precio
200 USD

 

Bottom: speaker, micro USB, microphone
Bottom: speaker, micro USB, microphone
Right side: microSD card tray, power button, volume buttons
Right side: microSD card tray, power button, volume buttons
Top: combo audio jack, speaker
Top: combo audio jack, speaker
Left side: nothing
Left side: nothing
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
615 MBit/s ∼100% +1340%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
326 MBit/s ∼53% +663%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
209 MBit/s ∼34% +389%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
802.11a/b/g/n
99.3 MBit/s ∼16% +133%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
42.7 MBit/s ∼7%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
569 MBit/s ∼100% +1159%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
264 MBit/s ∼46% +484%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
209 MBit/s ∼37% +362%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
802.11a/b/g/n
86 MBit/s ∼15% +90%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
45.2 MBit/s ∼8%

Comparación de Imágenes

Elige una escena y navega dentro de la primera imagen. Un click cambia el nivel de zoom. Un click en la imagen aumentada abre la original en una ventana nueva. La primera imagen muestra la fotografía escalada del dispositivo de pruebas.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3Scene 4
click para cargar imágenes
402.5
cd/m²
414.9
cd/m²
416.5
cd/m²
401.7
cd/m²
409.1
cd/m²
399.3
cd/m²
381.7
cd/m²
397.6
cd/m²
393.8
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 416.5 cd/m² Médio: 401.9 cd/m² Minimum: 4.02 cd/m²
iluminación: 92 %
Brillo con batería: 409.1 cd/m²
Contraste: 731:1 (Negro: 0.56 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.1 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 5.3 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.2
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
IPS, IPS, 8, 1920x1200
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
10-point Multitouch, IPS, 8, 1280x800
Apple iPad Mini 4
Retina Display, IPS, 7.9, 2048x1536
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
IPS, 8.4, 2560x1600
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Super AMOLED, 9.7, 2048x1526
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
IPS, 7, 1280x800
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
IPS, 7.9, 2048x1536
Response Times
-16%
-89%
86%
-112%
-29%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
27.2 (14, 13.2)
35.2 (16.4, 18.8)
-29%
59 (16, 43)
-117%
4 (2, 2)
85%
69 (45, 24)
-154%
31 (14, 17)
-14%
Response Time Black / White *
22.4 (12.4, 10)
22.8 (11.6, 11.2)
-2%
36 (13, 23)
-61%
3.2 (2, 1.2)
86%
38 (22, 16)
-70%
32 (15, 17)
-43%
PWM Frequency
221.2 (100)
Screen
-21%
16%
-1%
35%
6%
11%
Brightness
402
412
2%
421
5%
445
11%
468
16%
344
-14%
364
-9%
Brightness Distribution
92
91
-1%
91
-1%
90
-2%
82
-11%
92
0%
88
-4%
Black Level *
0.56
0.39
30%
0.58
-4%
0.45
20%
0.37
34%
0.57
-2%
Contrast
731
1074
47%
709
-3%
1022
40%
968
32%
677
-7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.1
8.5
-107%
2.15
48%
6.2
-51%
1.8
56%
5.3
-29%
3.3
20%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.3
10.3
-94%
2.72
49%
6.5
-23%
1.2
77%
4.7
11%
1.7
68%
Gamma
2.2 109%
2.6 92%
2.29 105%
2.33 103%
2.11 114%
2.44 98%
2.42 99%
CCT
7603 85%
6216 105%
7012 93%
8056 81%
6500 100%
7222 90%
6397 102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
82.32
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.06
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
-19% / -19%
16% / 16%
-45% / -23%
61% / 52%
-53% / -24%
-9% / 1%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
22.4 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 12.4 ms subida
↘ 10 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 21 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (26.6 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
27.2 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 14 ms subida
↘ 13.2 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 10 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (42.4 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 54 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8499 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
144426 Points ∼63% +213%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
86735 Points ∼38% +88%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
71734 Points ∼31% +56%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
46126 Points ∼20%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
34714 Points ∼15% -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
22854 Points ∼10% -50%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
2331 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
1754 Points ∼57%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
867 Points ∼28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
3196 Points ∼46%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
656 Points ∼9%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
115 Points ∼2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
2702 Points ∼53%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
781 Points ∼15%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
143 Points ∼3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
2100 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
1724 Points ∼55%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
1398 Points ∼45%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
880 Points ∼28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
4772 Points ∼39%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
1423 Points ∼12%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
1021 Points ∼8%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
192 Points ∼2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
3426 Points ∼51%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
1418 Points ∼21%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
1153 Points ∼17%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
232 Points ∼3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
2322 Points ∼75% +75%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
1798 Points ∼58% +36%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
1450 Points ∼47% +10%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
1324 Points ∼43%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
878 Points ∼29% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
2943 Points ∼55% +1019%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
832 Points ∼15% +216%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
781 Points ∼15% +197%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
263 Points ∼5%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
121 Points ∼2% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
2578 Points ∼66% +706%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
970 Points ∼25% +203%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
870 Points ∼22% +172%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
320 Points ∼8%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
150 Points ∼4% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
2261 Points ∼73% +70%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
1811 Points ∼59% +36%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
1385 Points ∼45% +4%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
1332 Points ∼43%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
881 Points ∼29% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
4626 Points ∼60% +760%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
1310 Points ∼17% +143%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
997 Points ∼13% +85%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
538 Points ∼7%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
193 Points ∼2% -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
3438 Points ∼69% +455%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
1326 Points ∼27% +114%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
1139 Points ∼23% +84%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
620 Points ∼12%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
234 Points ∼5% -62%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
21886 Points ∼30% +136%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
15538 Points ∼22% +68%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
11568 Points ∼16% +25%
Apple iPad Mini 4
Apple A8
9844 Points ∼14% +6%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
9274 Points ∼13% 0%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
9264 Points ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
7790 Points ∼11% -16%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
34002 Points ∼7% +235%
Apple iPad Mini 4
Apple A8
25254 Points ∼6% +148%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
22306 Points ∼5% +119%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
22141 Points ∼5% +118%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
10163 Points ∼2%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
5435 Points ∼1% -47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
3146 Points ∼1% -69%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
30277 Points ∼15% +204%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
20230 Points ∼10% +103%
Apple iPad Mini 4
Apple A8
18737 Points ∼10% +88%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
18491 Points ∼9% +86%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
9948 Points ∼5%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
5986 Points ∼3% -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
3626 Points ∼2% -64%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
6998 Points ∼10%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
1914 Points ∼0%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
2282 Points ∼1%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
6992 Points ∼4%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
3352 Points ∼0%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
3790 Points ∼0%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
92 fps ∼7% +441%
Apple iPad Mini 4
Apple A8
47.8 fps ∼4% +181%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
34 fps ∼2% +100%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
29 fps ∼2% +71%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
17 fps ∼1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
9.9 fps ∼1% -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
4.2 fps ∼0% -75%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
59 fps ∼6% +269%
Apple iPad Mini 4
Apple A8
37 fps ∼4% +131%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
27 fps ∼3% +69%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
23 fps ∼2% +44%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
17 fps ∼2% +6%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
16 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
6.5 fps ∼1% -59%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
48 fps ∼9% +596%
Apple iPad Mini 4
Apple A8
21.5 fps ∼4% +212%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
15 fps ∼3% +117%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
13 fps ∼2% +88%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
6.9 fps ∼1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
3.6 fps ∼1% -48%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
34 fps ∼6% +347%
Apple iPad Mini 4
Apple A8
15.3 fps ∼3% +101%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
11 fps ∼2% +45%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
9 fps ∼2% +18%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
7.6 fps ∼1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
7.1 fps ∼1% -7%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
32 fps ∼8% +553%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
9.5 fps ∼2% +94%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
7.7 fps ∼2% +57%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
4.9 fps ∼1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
2.3 fps ∼1% -53%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
19 fps ∼5% +313%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
6.1 fps ∼1% +33%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
5 fps ∼1% +9%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
4.6 fps ∼1%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
4.2 fps ∼1% -9%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
19 fps ∼5% +604%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
5.4 fps ∼2% +100%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
4.8 fps ∼1% +78%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
2.7 fps ∼1%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
13 fps ∼0% +420%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
4 fps ∼0% +60%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
3.1 fps ∼0% +24%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
2.5 fps ∼0%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 battery life
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
393 min ∼51%
Computer Vision score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
3105 Points ∼51% +48%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
2105 Points ∼35%
Storage score
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
9462 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
2884 Points ∼19% -70%
Work 2.0 performance score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
5432 Points ∼53% +45%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
3744 Points ∼36%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
2907 Points ∼28% -22%
Work performance score
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
6018 Points ∼70% +24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
5608 Points ∼66% +16%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
5204 Points ∼61% +7%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
4843 Points ∼57%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
4125 Points ∼48% -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
3095 Points ∼36% -36%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Apple iPad Mini 4
Apple A8
1059 Points ∼62% +51%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
1022 Points ∼60% +46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
1007 Points ∼59% +43%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
873 Points ∼51% +24%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
702 Points ∼41%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
593 Points ∼35% -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
521 Points ∼31% -26%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
4941 Points ∼53% +536%
Apple iPad Mini 4
Apple A8
2668 Points ∼29% +243%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
1651 Points ∼18% +112%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
1302 Points ∼14% +68%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
777 Points ∼8%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
334 Points ∼4% -57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
150 Points ∼2% -81%
Memory
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
2212 Points ∼50% +81%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
1931 Points ∼44% +58%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
1590 Points ∼36% +30%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
1224 Points ∼28%
Apple iPad Mini 4
Apple A8
902 Points ∼20% -26%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
736 Points ∼17% -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
431 Points ∼10% -65%
System
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
3581 Points ∼35% +81%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
3505 Points ∼34% +77%
Apple iPad Mini 4
Apple A8
3132 Points ∼30% +58%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
2076 Points ∼20% +5%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
1980 Points ∼19%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
1152 Points ∼11% -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
923 Points ∼9% -53%
Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
2409 Points ∼64% +125%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
1800 Points ∼47% +68%
Apple iPad Mini 4
Apple A8
1681 Points ∼44% +57%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
1475 Points ∼39% +38%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
1072 Points ∼28%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
640 Points ∼17% -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
345 Points ∼9% -68%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
7063 Points ∼82%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
4187 Points ∼17% +48%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
2821 Points ∼11%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
1683 Points ∼7% -40%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
1745 Points ∼29% +160%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
670 Points ∼11%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
628 Points ∼11% -6%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Mali-400 MP2, SC7731, 8 GB eMMC Flash
15533.8 ms * ∼26% -23%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Adreno 505, 435, 16 GB eMMC Flash
12635 ms * ∼21%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
Mali-T720, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash
11817.6 ms * ∼20% +6%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3803.2 ms * ∼6% +70%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2822.9 ms * ∼5% +78%
Apple iPad Mini 4
PowerVR GX6450, A8, 64 GB SSD
2557 ms * ∼4% +80%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2244.4 ms * ∼4% +82%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11404 Points ∼23% +274%
Apple iPad Mini 4
PowerVR GX6450, A8, 64 GB SSD
9962 Points ∼20% +227%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9531 Points ∼19% +213%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8349 Points ∼17% +174%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Adreno 505, 435, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3049 Points ∼6%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
Mali-T720, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash
2826 Points ∼6% -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Mali-400 MP2, SC7731, 8 GB eMMC Flash
2300 Points ∼5% -25%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53.7 Points ∼0% +204%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
45.9 Points ∼0% +160%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
42.73 Points ∼0% +142%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
Mali-T720, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash
19.519 Points ∼0% +10%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Adreno 505, 435, 16 GB eMMC Flash
17.68 Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Mali-400 MP2, SC7731, 8 GB eMMC Flash
14.5 Points ∼0% -18%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPad Mini 4
PowerVR GX6450, A8, 64 GB SSD
144 Points ∼19% +109%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
136 Points ∼18% +97%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
132 Points ∼18% +91%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
103 Points ∼14% +49%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Adreno 505, 435, 16 GB eMMC Flash
69 Points ∼9%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
Mali-T720, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash
57 Points ∼8% -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Mali-400 MP2, SC7731, 8 GB eMMC Flash
40 Points ∼5% -42%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
16 GB eMMC Flash
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
16 GB eMMC Flash
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
8 GB eMMC Flash
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
32 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5
25%
104%
106%
-23%
53%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
14.6
34.15
134%
23.52
61%
58.56
301%
18.4
26%
20.61
41%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
87.7
51.06
-42%
61.65
-30%
76.39
-13%
21.41
-76%
39.62
-55%
Random Write 4KB
7.64
11.51
51%
31.35
310%
13.13
72%
9.55
25%
6.91
-10%
Random Read 4KB
35
21.55
-38%
32.04
-8%
45.82
31%
21.95
-37%
52.02
49%
Sequential Write 256KB
38.01
47.23
24%
117.15
208%
87.6
130%
28.95
-24%
116.62
207%
Sequential Read 256KB
135.09
159.08
18%
249.68
85%
288.58
114%
65.94
-51%
252.3
87%
Carga Máx.
 33 °C36.2 °C37 °C 
 32.2 °C33.6 °C34.8 °C 
 31.8 °C32.6 °C35 °C 
Máximo: 37 °C
Médio: 34 °C
37 °C42.2 °C36.2 °C
35.2 °C35.2 °C34.2 °C
34.6 °C35 °C34.2 °C
Máximo: 42.2 °C
Médio: 36 °C
Conector de corriente  34 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.2372538.3393136.838.8403737.45033.936.16333.934.98032.635.910032.23612530.336.216028.937.520028.639.325028.341.53152845.340026.74750026506302551.280024.753.6100024.159.5125023.563.7160023.263.920002361.8250022.764.6315022.367.3400022.566.2500022.365.5630022.161.4800022.165.5100002264.6125002257.71600021.949.1SPL35.675.8N2.634median 23.5Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8median 57.7Delta2.79.931.73832.431.73430.331.33427.824.131.727.828.627.22628.63838.639.43827.430.336.227.427.525.828.627.524.723.625.424.72622.521.32626.822.523.326.834.52422.534.54628.122.44656.136.121.356.160.241.518.460.26548.117.56568.452.117.568.469.853.317.269.873.556.516.873.574.658.317.374.676.959.417.476.975.558.916.675.572.154.417.372.172.754.917.672.774.255.917.674.27455.917.77480.662.617.480.682.464.617.782.472.254.317.972.262.544.218.162.55435.718.15487.870.229.887.871.624.61.371.6median 69.8Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016median 53.3median 17.7median 69.81210.31.612hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 2.3 / 2.92 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 4.02 / 6 / 6.64 Watt
Carga midlight 7.34 / 9.6 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
435, Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1200, 8
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1280x800, 8
Apple iPad Mini 4
A8, PowerVR GX6450, 64 GB SSD, IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
SC7731, Mali-400 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1280x800, 7
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
435, Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Power Consumption
53%
39%
31%
46%
37%
34%
Idle Minimum *
4.02
0.99
75%
0.8
80%
1.51
62%
1.91
52%
1.01
75%
1.45
64%
Idle Average *
6
2.74
54%
3.6
40%
3.64
39%
3.59
40%
2.71
55%
4.44
26%
Idle Maximum *
6.64
2.83
57%
3.9
41%
3.68
45%
4.06
39%
2.75
59%
4.61
31%
Load Average *
7.34
4.51
39%
6.1
17%
6.95
5%
4.29
42%
7.28
1%
6.21
15%
Load Maximum *
9.6
5.69
41%
8
17%
9.11
5%
4.31
55%
10.02
-4%
6.33
34%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
23h 02min
Navegando con WLAN v1.3
14h 37min
Carga (máximo brillo)
8h 00min
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
435, Adreno 505, 18.6 Wh
Apple iPad Mini 4
A8, PowerVR GX6450, 19 Wh
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, Mali-T720,  Wh
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4, 19.5 Wh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530,  Wh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
SC7731, Mali-400 MP2, 14.8 Wh
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510, 18 Wh
Duración de Batería
-27%
6%
-34%
1%
-17%
-36%
Reader / Idle
1382
1488
8%
2032
47%
1110
-20%
1903
38%
1353
-2%
1147
-17%
WiFi v1.3
877
539
-39%
770
-12%
546
-38%
760
-13%
619
-29%
470
-46%
Load
480
242
-50%
393
-18%
268
-44%
375
-22%
379
-21%
263
-45%

Pro

+ beautiful and well-built case
+ decent camera with good detail
+ rich IPS display with great viewing angles
+ runs very cool under load
+ excellent battery life
+ loud, clear speakers...

Contra

- ...that unfortunately lack body and bass
- very poor WiFi speeds
- exhaustive amount of bloatware
- middling performance
- poor gaming performance
En análisis: Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite 8. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Huawei.
En análisis: Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite 8. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Huawei.

El MediaPad M3 Lite 8 fue diseñado para ser un pequeño dispositivo de medios portátil. Con su pantalla colorida y brillante y largo aguante, cae en este nicho perfectamente. El tablet es genial para los usuarios ocasionales que buscan un tablet maravillosamente diseñada para satisfacer sus necesidades de navegación por internet y del consumo de los medios. Las grandes cámaras son una buena adición. Pero el dispositivo no tiene buen rendimiento gaming, ni almacenamiento decente, cuenta con bloatware innecesario y velocidades inalámbricas por debajo del promedio. Los usuarios avanzados y los jugadores estarán muy decepcionados con el tablet, pero la mayoría encontrará que el tablet es perfectamente aceptable para disfrutar de la reproducción de vídeo y juegos más ligeros.

El factor decisivo inevitablemente será el precio. Fuera de su calidad de construcción, la versión de sólo WiFi no ofrece mucho más que su competencia más barata. Por $199, puede estar fuera del alcance de aquellos que desean un tablet exclusivamente para YouTube y similares. Hay mejores opciones, como el Samsung Galaxy Tab A 7, que está por $50 menos. El Asus Zenpad 3 8.0 ofrece más potencia, una pantalla de mayor densidad y normalmente se vende por $50 más. Sin embargo, la línea Huawei MediaPad tiene rebajas frecuentemente; en el momento de escribir este artículo, Amazon tiene el dispositivo listado por $170. Esto hace que el dispositivo sea mucho más tentador.

  

Los consumidores en busca de un tablet para navegar por la web de y el consumo de contenido que no parece un juguete de plástico barato puede considerar el Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite 8. Sin embargo, tendrán que hacer concesiones sobre el rendimiento de los juegos y la CPU. Dicho esto, el MediaPad M3 Lite 8 es un tablet de bajo presupuesto precioso, aunque caro, que deslumbra con su aspecto en lugar de su potencia.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 - 09/27/2017 v6
Sam Medley

Acabado
86%
Teclado
74 / 80 → 92%
Ratón
96%
Conectividad
36 / 65 → 55%
Peso
86 / 88 → 96%
Battería
98%
Pantalla
84%
Rendimiento de juegos
20 / 68 → 30%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
40 / 76 → 53%
Temperatura
91%
Ruido
100%
Audio
73 / 91 → 80%
Cámara
69 / 85 → 81%
Médio
73%
86%
Tablet - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del tablet Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite 8
Sam Medley, 2017-10- 2 (Update: 2017-10- 2)