Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del Aorus X3 Plus v7 (i7-7820HK, GTX 1060) Xotic PC Edition

Sam Medley (traducido por Francisco García), 05/20/2017

Pequeño gritón. El Aorus X3 Plus v7 tiene mucha potencia en un paquete pequeño. Si bien las entrañas son impresionantes, las temperaturas y el ruido presentan problemas. Emisiones aparte, el X3 Plus v7 es un portátil gaming portable y capaz.

Aorus x3 Plus v7 (X3 Serie)
Procesador
Adaptador gráfico
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) - 6144 MB, Núcleo: 1582 MHz, Overclocked, Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 21.21.13.7654, Nvidia Optimus
Memoría
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2400, PC4-19200
pantalla
13.9 pulgadas 16:9, 3200 x 1800 pixels 264 PPI, No, Sharp SHP1401, IGZO TFT, lustroso: no
Placa base
Intel HM175
Disco duro
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, 512 GB 
, 512 GB, PCIe NVMe, 463 GB libre
Tarjeta de sonido
Intel Skylake PCH-H High Definition Audio Controller
Conexiones
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Conexiones: Mikrofon / Kopfhörer, getrennte Ein- und Ausgänge, Card Reader: SD/SDXC/SDHC, Brightness Sensor
Equipamento de red
Qualcomm Killer e2200 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n/ac)
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 22.9 x 327 x 263.5
Battería
74 Wh Litio-Polimero, Duración de la Batería (según el fabricante): 7.5 h
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Características adicionales
Altavoces: 2 2-Watt-Lautsprecher (stereo), Teclado: Chiclet, Luz de Teclado: si, Aorus Command&Control, XSplit Broadcaster, 24 Meses Garantía
Peso
1.8 kg
Precio
2000 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

390 mm 266 mm 39.8 mm 3.1 kg390 mm 272 mm 23 mm 2.7 kg380 mm 249 mm 18 mm 1.9 kg356 mm 250 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg345 mm 236 mm 18 mm 1.8 kg335 mm 250 mm 20 mm 1.9 kg330 mm 269 mm 22 mm 2.5 kg327 mm 263.5 mm 22.9 mm 1.8 kg
Left: Kensington lock, Mini DisplayPort, HDMI 2.0, USB 3.0 Type-A, mic jack, headphone jack, USB 3.1 Type-C (not Thunderbolt)
Left: Kensington lock, Mini DisplayPort, HDMI 2.0, USB 3.0 Type-A, mic jack, headphone jack, USB 3.1 Type-C (not Thunderbolt)
Right: SD card reader, 2x USB 3.0 Type-A, power button
Right: SD card reader, 2x USB 3.0 Type-A, power button
Front: Status LEDs (on left side)
Front: Status LEDs (on left side)
Rear: power in, Gigabit Ethernet
Rear: power in, Gigabit Ethernet
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Gigabyte Aero 14
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
684 MBit/s ∼100% +9%
Gigabyte Aero 15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
678 MBit/s ∼99% +8%
Alienware 13 R3
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
667 MBit/s ∼98% +7%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
662 MBit/s ∼97% +6%
Aorus x3 Plus v7
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
626 MBit/s ∼92%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
558 MBit/s ∼82% -11%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
594 MBit/s ∼100% +18%
Alienware 13 R3
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
571 MBit/s ∼96% +14%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
569 MBit/s ∼96% +13%
Gigabyte Aero 14
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
503 MBit/s ∼85% 0%
Aorus x3 Plus v7
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
502 MBit/s ∼85%
Gigabyte Aero 15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
346 MBit/s ∼58% -31%
Every component is readily available.
Every component is readily available.
There is space for more RAM and another NVMe SSD.
There is space for more RAM and another NVMe SSD.
CPU and GPU fans and heat sink array.
CPU and GPU fans and heat sink array.
411.1
cd/m²
374.4
cd/m²
373.5
cd/m²
380.7
cd/m²
348
cd/m²
320
cd/m²
386.4
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
300
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 411.1 cd/m² Médio: 359.1 cd/m² Minimum: 10.79 cd/m²
iluminación: 73 %
Brillo con batería: 348 cd/m²
Contraste: 1200:1 (Negro: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
96% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
Aorus x3 Plus v7
Sharp SHP1401, IGZO TFT, 13.9, 3200x1800
Alienware 13 R3
JJT6C_133KL05 (SDCA029), OLED, 13.3, 2560x1440
Gigabyte Aero 14
LG Philips LP140QH1-SPF1 (LGD049A), IPS, 14, 2560x1440
Razer Blade (2017)
LP140WF3-SPD1, IPS, 14, 1920x1080
Gigabyte Aero 15
N156HCA-EA1 (CMN15D7), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Eurocom Tornado F5
IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
IPS, 15.6, 3840x2160
Aorus X5 v6 AO-S107W516-PL-002
Panasonic MEI96A2 / VVX16T028J00, , 15.6, 2880x1620
Response Times
54%
-5%
3511%
4251%
-8%
200%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
38 (19.6, 18.4)
41 (17, 24)
-8%
25.2 (18, 17.2)
34%
42.8 (23.6, 19.2)
-13%
33.6 (8.4, 25.2)
12%
28 (15.6, 12.4)
26%
Response Time Black / White *
24.4 (11.2, 13.2)
2.8 (1.2, 1.6)
89%
25 (4, 21)
-2%
24.8 (13.2, 11.6)
-2%
32 (18.8, 13.2)
-31%
31.2 (4.4, 26.8)
-28%
23.6 (15.2, 8.4)
3%
PWM Frequency
201.6 (50)
240 (100)
19%
21370
10500%
26000 (20)
12797%
1351 (39)
570%
Screen
10%
-32%
-30%
-40%
-35%
-89%
-15%
Brightness middle
348
313
-10%
290
-17%
272
-22%
320
-8%
315.8
-9%
274.2
-21%
350
1%
Brightness
359
310
-14%
257
-28%
277
-23%
316
-12%
310
-14%
263
-27%
296
-18%
Brightness Distribution
73
87
19%
79
8%
84
15%
90
23%
90
23%
92
26%
79
8%
Black Level *
0.29
0.3
-3%
0.26
10%
0.36
-24%
0.33
-14%
0.44
-52%
0.4
-38%
Contrast
1200
967
-19%
1046
-13%
889
-26%
957
-20%
623
-48%
875
-27%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.4
2.54
-6%
4.59
-91%
4.59
-91%
4.62
-93%
5
-108%
8
-233%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.1
3.94
23%
8.68
-70%
8.49
-66%
9.75
-91%
10.1
-98%
14.6
-186%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.3
1.43
38%
4.32
-88%
4.28
-86%
6
-161%
4.2
-83%
9.1
-296%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.3 96%
2.25 98%
2.23 99%
2.46 89%
2.12 104%
2.24 98%
CCT
6206 105%
6337 103%
7320 89%
6848 95%
6761 96%
6107 106%
5020 129%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
62
78
26%
59
-5%
55
-11%
60
-3%
54.5
-12%
45.7
-26%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
96
97
1%
92
-4%
83
-14%
92
-4%
83
-14%
72.1
-25%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
32% / 19%
-19% / -27%
1741% / 787%
2106% / 950%
-22% / -30%
56% / -22%
-15% / -15%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
24.4 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 11.2 ms subida
↘ 13.2 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 38 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (25.2 ms).
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
38 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 19.6 ms subida
↘ 18.4 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 36 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (40.2 ms).

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado 201.6 Hz ≤ 50 % de brillo

La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 201.6 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 50 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM.

La frecuencia de 201.6 Hz es relativamente baja, por lo que la gente sensible debería ver parpadeos y padecer fatiga visual por la pantalla (usado al brillo indicado a continuación).

Comparación: 51 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 9439 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
190 Points ∼87% +5%
Aorus x3 Plus v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
181 Points ∼83%
Aorus X5 v6 AO-S107W516-PL-002
Intel Core i7-6820HK
170 Points ∼78% -6%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
162 Points ∼74% -10%
Gigabyte Aero 15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points ∼74% -11%
Alienware 13 R3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
159 Points ∼73% -12%
Gigabyte Aero 14
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
159 Points ∼73% -12%
Razer Blade (2017)
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
154 Points ∼71% -15%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
897 Points ∼20% +10%
Aorus x3 Plus v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
819 Points ∼19%
Aorus X5 v6 AO-S107W516-PL-002
Intel Core i7-6820HK
769 Points ∼18% -6%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
742 Points ∼17% -9%
Gigabyte Aero 15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
742 Points ∼17% -9%
Alienware 13 R3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
737 Points ∼17% -10%
Gigabyte Aero 14
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
730 Points ∼17% -11%
Razer Blade (2017)
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
729 Points ∼17% -11%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
2.19 Points ∼90% +5%
Aorus x3 Plus v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
2.08 Points ∼85%
Gigabyte Aero 15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.84 Points ∼75% -12%
Alienware 13 R3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.81 Points ∼74% -13%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.77 Points ∼73% -15%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
9.78 Points ∼36% +10%
Aorus x3 Plus v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
8.86 Points ∼33%
Gigabyte Aero 15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.23 Points ∼30% -7%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.18 Points ∼30% -8%
Alienware 13 R3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.1 Points ∼30% -9%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Aorus x3 Plus v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
8872 Points ∼82%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
7222 Points ∼67% -19%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5747 Points ∼53% -35%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Aorus x3 Plus v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
32510 Points ∼65%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
28189 Points ∼57% -13%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22217 Points ∼45% -32%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Aorus x3 Plus v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
327.1 s * ∼4%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
236 s * ∼3% +28%
Aorus X5 v6 AO-S107W516-PL-002
Intel Core i7-6820HK
229.953 s * ∼3% +30%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
176.329 s * ∼2% +46%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
579.909 Seconds * ∼3% -11%
Aorus x3 Plus v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
521.8 Seconds * ∼2%
Aorus X5 v6 AO-S107W516-PL-002
Intel Core i7-6820HK
487.544 Seconds * ∼2% +7%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
440.036 Seconds * ∼2% +16%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
8872
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
32510
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6830
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.08 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.86 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
181 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
819 Points
ayuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Tornado F5
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
6515 Points ∼100% +41%
Gigabyte Aero 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
5290 Points ∼81% +15%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5268 Points ∼81% +14%
Razer Blade (2017)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
5008 Points ∼77% +9%
Alienware 13 R3
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
4799 Points ∼74% +4%
Gigabyte Aero 14
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, LiteOn CX2-8B256
4702 Points ∼72% +2%
Aorus x3 Plus v7
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
4605 Points ∼71%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Tornado F5
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
8593 Points ∼90% +101%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5318 Points ∼56% +24%
Alienware 13 R3
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
5200 Points ∼55% +22%
Aorus x3 Plus v7
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
4278 Points ∼45%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Tornado F5
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
5476 Points ∼90% +68%
Gigabyte Aero 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
4248 Points ∼70% +30%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
4141 Points ∼68% +27%
Razer Blade (2017)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
3958 Points ∼65% +21%
Alienware 13 R3
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
3894 Points ∼64% +19%
Gigabyte Aero 14
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, LiteOn CX2-8B256
3717 Points ∼61% +14%
Aorus x3 Plus v7
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
3266 Points ∼54%
PCMark 7 Score
5966 puntos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3266 puntos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4278 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4605 puntos
ayuda
Aorus x3 Plus v7
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Alienware 13 R3
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
Gigabyte Aero 14
LiteOn CX2-8B256
Razer Blade (2017)
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
Gigabyte Aero 15
Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
Eurocom Tornado F5
Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
Aorus X5 v6 AO-S107W516-PL-002
LiteOn CX2-8B256
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-23%
-14%
-38%
-6%
12%
7%
-12%
Write 4k QD32
516.7
311.2
-40%
441
-15%
308
-40%
490.5
-5%
634
23%
526.9
2%
486.2
-6%
Read 4k QD32
699.8
593.1
-15%
601.6
-14%
565
-19%
644.8
-8%
744.4
6%
631.7
-10%
644.3
-8%
Write 4k
156
140.2
-10%
131.2
-16%
134.3
-14%
123.3
-21%
180.6
16%
158.2
1%
143.2
-8%
Read 4k
44.8
37.65
-16%
44.93
0%
34.8
-22%
44.7
0%
55.94
25%
54.2
21%
46.13
3%
Write 512
1221
405.6
-67%
814.2
-33%
310
-75%
1069
-12%
966.7
-21%
1531
25%
723.7
-41%
Read 512
966.3
1070
11%
984.7
2%
682
-29%
890.7
-8%
715.3
-26%
499.7
-48%
952.1
-1%
Write Seq
1324
789.4
-40%
794.6
-40%
311
-77%
1133
-14%
1724
30%
1621
22%
767.4
-42%
Read Seq
1498
1373
-8%
1584
6%
1122
-25%
1769
18%
2145
43%
2141
43%
1605
7%
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Tasa de Transferencia Mínima: 292.3 MB/s
Tasa de Transferencia Máxima: 1311.4 MB/s
Tasa de Transferencia Promedio: 630.7 MB/s
Tiempo de Acceso: 0.07 ms
Velocidad de Ráfagas: 602.9 MB/s
Uso de CPU: 2.2 %
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Aorus X5 v6 AO-S107W516-PL-002
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
17393 Points ∼43% +41%
Eurocom Tornado F5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700K
17321 Points ∼43% +41%
Aorus x3 Plus v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7820HK
12298 Points ∼30%
Gigabyte Aero 14
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
11625 Points ∼29% -5%
Alienware 13 R3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
11323 Points ∼28% -8%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
11261 Points ∼28% -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
11173 Points ∼27% -9%
Razer Blade (2017)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
10853 Points ∼27% -12%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Eurocom Tornado F5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700K
114095 Points ∼62% +163%
Aorus X5 v6 AO-S107W516-PL-002
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
102589 Points ∼56% +136%
Gigabyte Aero 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
77755 Points ∼42% +79%
Alienware 13 R3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
54974 Points ∼30% +27%
Aorus x3 Plus v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7820HK
43388 Points ∼24%
Gigabyte Aero 14
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
41631 Points ∼23% -4%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
32344 Points ∼18% -25%
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
33625 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
20785 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
10361 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
5532 puntos
ayuda
0123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (ordenar por valor)
Aorus x3 Plus v7
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
109 fps ∼41%
Eurocom Tornado F5
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
149.6 fps ∼56% +37%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
100.6 fps ∼38% -8%
Aorus X5 v6 AO-S107W516-PL-002
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, LiteOn CX2-8B256
135.5 fps ∼51% +24%
Metro: Last Light - 1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x (ordenar por valor)
Aorus x3 Plus v7
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
82 fps ∼48%
Eurocom Tornado F5
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
117.6 fps ∼68% +43%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
78.1 fps ∼45% -5%
Thief - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x (ordenar por valor)
Aorus x3 Plus v7
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
42 fps ∼30%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
74.9 fps ∼53% +78%
Aorus X5 v6 AO-S107W516-PL-002
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, LiteOn CX2-8B256
108.2 fps ∼76% +158%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) (ordenar por valor)
Aorus x3 Plus v7
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
40 fps ∼31%
Gigabyte Aero 14
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, LiteOn CX2-8B256
38.3 fps ∼30% -4%
Razer Blade (2017)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
37 fps ∼29% -7%
Gigabyte Aero 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
37.7 fps ∼29% -6%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
39.4 fps ∼31% -1%
Aorus X5 v6 AO-S107W516-PL-002
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, LiteOn CX2-8B256
60.6 fps ∼47% +52%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x (ordenar por valor)
Aorus x3 Plus v7
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
65 fps ∼35%
Razer Blade (2017)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
57 fps ∼30% -12%
Eurocom Tornado F5
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
98 fps ∼52% +51%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
64.1 fps ∼34% -1%
Ashes of the Singularity - 1920x1080 high (ordenar por valor)
Aorus x3 Plus v7
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
50 fps ∼50%
Eurocom Tornado F5
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
78.2 fps ∼78% +56%
Doom - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM (ordenar por valor)
Aorus x3 Plus v7
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
97 fps ∼49%
Eurocom Tornado F5
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
136.5 fps ∼68% +41%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
92.3 fps ∼46% -5%
Fallout 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x (ordenar por valor)
Aorus x3 Plus v7
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
77 fps ∼46%
Eurocom Tornado F5
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
107.6 fps ∼64% +40%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
64 fps ∼38% -17%
bajo medio alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 109fps
Metro: Last Light (2013) 82fps
Thief (2014) 42fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 40fps
Fallout 4 (2015) 77fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 65fps
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 50fps
Doom (2016) 97fps
Mafia 3 (2016) 45fps

Ruido

Ocioso
31.4 / 37 / 40.8 dB(A)
Carga
50 / 53.6 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 29.1 dB(A)
Aorus x3 Plus v7
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Alienware 13 R3
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
Gigabyte Aero 14
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, LiteOn CX2-8B256
Razer Blade (2017)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
Gigabyte Aero 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
Eurocom Tornado F5
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
Aorus X5 v6 AO-S107W516-PL-002
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, LiteOn CX2-8B256
Noise
15%
9%
10%
10%
6%
11%
1%
off / environment *
29.1
29
-0%
31
-7%
31
-7%
29.4
-1%
28.8
1%
Idle Minimum *
31.4
29
8%
31
1%
30
4%
32
-2%
33.3
-6%
33.1
-5%
33.4
-6%
Idle Average *
37
30
19%
32
14%
30
19%
33
11%
33.5
9%
33.1
11%
34.2
8%
Idle Maximum *
40.8
31
24%
33
19%
30
26%
34
17%
33.5
18%
34
17%
35
14%
Load Average *
50
36
28%
42
16%
51
-2%
39
22%
44.2
12%
37.2
26%
53.3
-7%
Witcher 3 ultra *
53.6
45
16%
43
20%
46.1
14%
Load Maximum *
53.6
49
9%
53
1%
51
5%
50
7%
52.5
2%
47.1
12%
57
-6%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

 33 °C42 °C40.2 °C 
 29.6 °C46.8 °C35 °C 
 25.4 °C25 °C27 °C 
Máximo: 46.8 °C
Médio: 33.8 °C
42.6 °C55.2 °C38.6 °C
37.2 °C43.4 °C31.6 °C
29 °C29.8 °C27.2 °C
Máximo: 55.2 °C
Médio: 37.2 °C
Conector de corriente  53 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Therometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 39.5 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.2 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 42 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27 °C / 80.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+1.8 °C / 3.2 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203938.22535.135.63134.634.1403334.65034.435.36333.735.68031.831.210031.131.312530.231.516028.931.820028.1362502847.931527.255.740027.15750026.458.363026.154.680025.160.910002562125025.458.3160024.357.4200023.957.3250023.462315023.259.3400023.357.4500023.160.5630023.161.8800023.2631000023.366.11250023.463.61600023.250SPL36.572.5N2.731median 25median 57.4Delta1.86.539.337.838.636.22827.73332.529.230.127.727.631.232.627.736.423.739.222.144.521.85321.358.520.260.320.163.619.866.21868.517.272.417.368.817.16617.264.717.367.817.368.417.467.417.566.417.459.617.555.117.662.117.663.517.652.117.542.829.978.71.344.5median 17.6median 63.51.67.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAorus x3 Plus v7Alienware 13 R3
Aorus x3 Plus v7 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.49 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Alienware 13 R3 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.4 / 12.7 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 15.1 / 15.8 / 16.7 Watt
Carga midlight 110.9 / 170.4 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Aorus x3 Plus v7
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IGZO TFT, 3200x1800, 13.9
Alienware 13 R3
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, OLED, 2560x1440, 13.3
Gigabyte Aero 14
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), LiteOn CX2-8B256, IPS, 2560x1440, 14
Razer Blade (2017)
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Gigabyte Aero 15
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Eurocom Tornado F5
7700K, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Aorus X5 v6 AO-S107W516-PL-002
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), LiteOn CX2-8B256, , 2880x1620, 15.6
Power Consumption
21%
18%
29%
9%
-46%
2%
-70%
Idle Minimum *
15.1
7
54%
8
47%
7.5
50%
12
21%
21.2
-40%
14.5
4%
23.3
-54%
Idle Average *
15.8
12
24%
13
18%
12.1
23%
15
5%
25.1
-59%
17.3
-9%
30.1
-91%
Idle Maximum *
16.7
18
-8%
20
-20%
14.3
14%
20
-20%
26.3
-57%
17.4
-4%
31
-86%
Load Average *
110.9
76
31%
78
30%
73.5
34%
82
26%
169.4
-53%
93
16%
195.8
-77%
Load Maximum *
170.4
161
6%
146
14%
110.2
35%
161
6%
202.4
-19%
242
-42%
Witcher 3 ultra *
135
110
19%
108
20%
111
18%
128.8
5%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
7h 57min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
4h 53min
Carga (máximo brillo)
1h 40min
Aorus x3 Plus v7
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 74 Wh
Alienware 13 R3
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 76 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 14
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 94 Wh
Razer Blade (2017)
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 70 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 94.24 Wh
Eurocom Tornado F5
7700K, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 75.24 Wh
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 65 Wh
Aorus X5 v6 AO-S107W516-PL-002
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 94.2 Wh
Duración de Batería
3%
66%
86%
30%
-33%
-22%
-49%
Reader / Idle
477
524
10%
909
91%
638
34%
291
-39%
386
-19%
242
-49%
WiFi v1.3
293
320
9%
524
79%
545
86%
422
44%
216
-26%
232
-21%
Load
100
90
-10%
129
29%
112
12%
67
-33%
75
-25%
WiFi
182

Pro

+ diseño genial
+ materiales de primera
+ gran rendimiento
+ pequeño y ligero
+ pantalla excelente
+ CPU y GPU desbloqueados

Contra

- ventiladores ruidosos y molestos
- se calienta
- ralentización CPU bajo carga
- bajo carga consume mucha energía para su adaptador de corriente
- touchpad frustrante
Aorus X3 Plus v7. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Xotic PC.
Aorus X3 Plus v7. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Xotic PC.

El X3 Plus v7 es un dispositivo ambicioso. Sigue el empuje de Aorus de encajar hardware potente en una carcasa compacta. Por desgracia, el X3 intenta abarcar mucho, y el resultado final es un portátil con sacrificios. Si bien hay algunos puntos fuertes claros, se tuvieron que hacer recortes para lograr este nivel de rendimiento, y el Aorus puede haberlos hecho en los sitios equivocados.

El diseño del X3 es excelente. El atractivo acabado junto con los sutiles acentos dan un chasis muy bonito, y el uso de metal alrededor del cuerpo hacen que el dispositivo parezca caro. La pantalla QHD+ también es impresionante. Las imágenes y el texto son bastante nítidas para verle el pelo al huevo, los colores son vibrantes y precisos, y la pantalla sigue brillante y legible incluso bajo luz solar directa. También nos impresionó el rendimiento  gaming. Es sorprendente que los usuarios tengan ahora rendimiento de nivel sobremesa (¡o superior!) en un portátil así de compacto. Además, la opción de acelerar tanto CPU como GPU son buenos añadidos; más flexibilidad suma valor.

Por desgracia, este rendimiento tiene un precio. El chasis es demasiado pequeño para manejar adecuadamente el calor generado por las potentes entrañas, lo que fuerza que los ventiladores redoblen esfuerzos con frecuencia y agresividad intentando sacar bastante calor para que todo siga funcionando. El resultado final es un portátil ruidoso que se calienta y puede ralentizarse térmicamente bajo fuerte carga. Además, el enorme consumo de energía es superior a lo que ofrece el adaptador de corriente, lo que es motivo de preocupación. De nuevo, los usuarios deberían tener cuidado al poner al portátil contra las cuerdas.

En general, nos gusta el Aorus X3 Plus v7. Rinde genial, pero comparado con la rígida competencia de Gigabyte Aero 14 y Alienware 13, el X3 se queda corto en otras áreas. El teclado mediocre, el frustrante touchpad, y los problemas de calor y ruido impiden que el X3 alcance el último escalón de los portátiles gaming delgados y ligeros.

Si bien el Aorus X3 Plus v7 ofrece un rendimiento impresionante en un paquete pequeño, hay demasiados sacrificios para que recomendemos el dispositivo. Hay opciones más equilibradas para los gamers que busquen un dispositivo portable. 

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Aorus x3 Plus v7 - 05/16/2017 v6
Sam Medley

Acabado
84 / 98 → 85%
Teclado
74%
Ratón
69%
Conectividad
57 / 81 → 71%
Peso
65 / 10-66 → 99%
Battería
82%
Pantalla
89%
Rendimiento de juegos
93%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
91%
Temperatura
86 / 95 → 91%
Ruido
58 / 90 → 64%
Audio
50%
Médio
75%
82%
Gaming - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Aorus X3 Plus v7 (i7-7820HK, GTX 1060) Xotic PC Edition
Sam Medley, 2017-05-20 (Update: 2017-05-20)