Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del HP Omen 15t-ce000 (7700HQ, GTX 1060 Max-Q, UHD)

Omen II. Nuestro segundo portátil gaming de pruebas de HP Omen 15" tiene casi el mismo hardware que el sistema anterior, pero trae un display 4K de 3840 x 2160 pixels. Cómo el display teóricamente menos frugal afecta al rendimiento y el aguante de la batería es el tema de nuestro análisis.
Bernhard Pechlaner (traducido por Francisco García), 🇺🇸 🇭🇺 ...
, , , , , ,
buscar relación
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
HP Omen 15t-ce000 (Omen 15t Serie)
Procesador
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 4 x 2.8 - 3.8 GHz, Kaby Lake
Adaptador gráfico
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q - 6144 MB, Núcleo: 1063 MHz, Memoría: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 387.92
Memoría
16384 MB 
, PC4-21300
pantalla
15.60 pulgadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixels 282 PPI, AU Optronics AUO23EB, IPS, 4K Anti-Glare Display with NVIDIA G-Sync Technology, lustroso: no
Placa base
Intel HM175 (Skylake PCH-H)
Disco duro
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR, 128 GB 
, NVMe-SSD + HGST HTS721010A9E630, 1 TB HDD @ 7200 rpm. Slots: 1x M.2 Typ 2280 PCIe 3.0 x4 & 1x 2.5-inch
Tarjeta de sonido
Intel Skylake PCH-H High Definition Audio Controller
Conexiones
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Conexiones: headphone jack, microphone jack, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC
Equipamento de red
Realtek RTL8169/8110 (10/100MBit/s), Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 25 x 389 x 276
Battería
70 Wh, 4550 mAh Litio-Ion, 4-cell
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Características adicionales
Altavoces: Bang & Olufsen, Teclado: chiclet, Luz de Teclado: si, 200 W power adapter, Quick Start Guide, System tools, McAfee LiveSafe Trial, MS Office 365 Trial , 12 Meses Garantía
Peso
2.628 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 920 g
Precio
1350 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

389 mm 276 mm 25 mm 2.6 kg389 mm 305 mm 25 mm 3.5 kg389 mm 274.7 mm 24.95 mm 2.7 kg391 mm 266 mm 22.5 mm 2.5 kg380 mm 265 mm 25.8 mm 2.4 kg356 mm 250 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
 
120.5 MB/s ∼100% +64%
Gigabyte Aero 15
 
78 MB/s ∼65% +6%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
 
73.5 MB/s ∼61%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
 
26.95 MB/s ∼22% -63%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
 
22.7 MB/s ∼19% -69%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
 
252.6 MB/s ∼100% +189%
Gigabyte Aero 15
 
89 MB/s ∼35% +2%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
 
87.5 MB/s ∼35%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
 
29.44 MB/s ∼12% -66%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
 
27.2 MB/s ∼11% -69%
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 15t-ce000
Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
633 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
618 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Alienware 15 R3
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
560 MBit/s ∼88% -12%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
522 MBit/s ∼82% -18%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
426 MBit/s ∼67% -33%
Gigabyte Aero 15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
346 MBit/s ∼55% -45%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
Realtek 8821AE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
345 MBit/s ∼55% -45%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
701 MBit/s ∼100% +28%
Alienware 15 R3
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
681 MBit/s ∼97% +25%
Gigabyte Aero 15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
678 MBit/s ∼97% +24%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
654 MBit/s ∼93% +20%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
546 MBit/s ∼78%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
541 MBit/s ∼77% -1%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
Realtek 8821AE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
285 MBit/s ∼41% -48%
347
cd/m²
357.4
cd/m²
350.1
cd/m²
350.3
cd/m²
358.5
cd/m²
350.4
cd/m²
341.3
cd/m²
349.2
cd/m²
344.9
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
AU Optronics AUO23EB
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 358.5 cd/m² Médio: 349.9 cd/m² Minimum: 16.6 cd/m²
iluminación: 95 %
Brillo con batería: 358.5 cd/m²
Contraste: 919:1 (Negro: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.6 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
91.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.89% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.79% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.13% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
HP Omen 15t-ce000
AU Optronics AUO23EB, IPS, 15.60, 3840x2160
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK3, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
ID: LG Philips LGD053F, Name: 156WF6, Dell P/N: 4XK13, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Gigabyte Aero 15
N156HCA-EA1 (CMN15D7), IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
LG Display LP156WF6-SPP1, AH-IPS, Normally Black, Transmissive, 15.60, 1920x1080
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
AUO42ED, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Aorus X5 v7
AU Optronics B156ZAN02.3 (AUO23EB), IPS, 15.60, 3840x2160
Display
-39%
-42%
-0%
-5%
-1%
-1%
Display P3 Coverage
66.13
39.01
-41%
37.07
-44%
65.23
-1%
65.85
0%
65.84
0%
65.33
-1%
sRGB Coverage
91.79
58.37
-36%
55.62
-39%
92.51
1%
85.05
-7%
90.87
-1%
91.94
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
66.89
40.34
-40%
38.32
-43%
66.54
-1%
62.19
-7%
66.47
-1%
66.34
-1%
Response Times
-11%
-3%
-22%
-23%
-21%
-12%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
37.6 (19.6, 18)
39 (21, 18)
-4%
35.6 (20, 15.6)
5%
42.8 (23.6, 19.2)
-14%
41 (21, 20)
-9%
43.2 (21.2, 22)
-15%
44 (21.2, 22.8)
-17%
Response Time Black / White *
24.8 (12.4, 12.4)
29 (16, 13)
-17%
27.6 (15.6, 12)
-11%
32 (18.8, 13.2)
-29%
34 (21, 13)
-37%
31.2 (16.4, 14.8)
-26%
26.4 (14, 12.4)
-6%
PWM Frequency
21000 (90)
26000 (20)
Screen
-22%
-27%
-6%
-3%
9%
0%
Brightness middle
358.5
283
-21%
235.4
-34%
320
-11%
322
-10%
304
-15%
307
-14%
Brightness
350
281
-20%
223
-36%
316
-10%
297
-15%
289
-17%
297
-15%
Brightness Distribution
95
91
-4%
91
-4%
90
-5%
86
-9%
86
-9%
92
-3%
Black Level *
0.39
0.39
-0%
0.28
28%
0.36
8%
0.31
21%
0.26
33%
0.3
23%
Contrast
919
726
-21%
841
-8%
889
-3%
1039
13%
1169
27%
1023
11%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.6
6.1
-33%
5.6
-22%
4.62
-0%
4.73
-3%
3.46
25%
4.72
-3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.5
11.08
-30%
20.3
-139%
9.75
-15%
12.37
-46%
7.72
9%
8.07
5%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.2
5.69
-9%
3.6
31%
6
-15%
2.99
42%
2.46
53%
4.79
8%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.44 90%
2.23 99%
2.46 89%
2.32 95%
2.38 92%
2.42 91%
CCT
6410 101%
6702 97%
7214 90%
6761 96%
6905 94%
6915 94%
7690 85%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
66.9
37
-45%
35.2
-47%
60
-10%
56
-16%
59
-12%
60
-10%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91.8
58
-37%
55.4
-40%
92
0%
85
-7%
91
-1%
92
0%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
-24% / -24%
-24% / -27%
-9% / -7%
-10% / -6%
-4% / 3%
-4% / -2%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
24.8 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 12.4 ms subida
↘ 12.4 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 43 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (24 ms).
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
37.6 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 19.6 ms subida
↘ 18 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 38 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (38.1 ms).

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 52 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 11356 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 2336000) Hz.

 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X5 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
174 Points ∼64% +8%
Gigabyte Aero 15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points ∼59% 0%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points ∼59%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points ∼59% -1%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
154 Points ∼57% -4%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
152 Points ∼56% -6%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
143 Points ∼53% -11%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
131 Points ∼48% -19%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus X5 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
827 Points ∼18% +13%
Gigabyte Aero 15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
742 Points ∼17% +2%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
740 Points ∼16% +1%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
730 Points ∼16%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
673 (660min - 673max) Points ∼15% -8%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
519 Points ∼12% -29%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
517 Points ∼12% -29%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
514 Points ∼11% -30%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X5 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.98 Points ∼63% +8%
Gigabyte Aero 15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.84 Points ∼59% +1%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.83 Points ∼58% 0%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.83 Points ∼58%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
1.77 Points ∼56% -3%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
1.52 Points ∼48% -17%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
1.5 Points ∼48% -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus X5 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
9.18 Points ∼19% +14%
Gigabyte Aero 15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.23 Points ∼17% +2%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.18 Points ∼16% +1%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.08 Points ∼16%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
5.92 Points ∼12% -27%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
5.76 Points ∼12% -29%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
5.38 Points ∼11% -33%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22228 Points ∼34% +1%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22033 Points ∼34%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
18158 Points ∼28% -18%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
17971 Points ∼28% -18%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
16329 Points ∼25% -26%
Rendering Single 32Bit
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
6501 Points ∼58% +10%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5945 Points ∼53% 0%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5920 Points ∼53%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
5436 Points ∼49% -8%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
5433 Points ∼49% -8%
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
402.56 s * ∼5% -25%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
331.085 s * ∼4% -3%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
322.2 s * ∼4%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
11275
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
22033
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5920
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
71.68 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.08 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.83 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
112.03 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
730 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
161 Points
ayuda
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4858 Points ∼77% +12%
Aorus X5 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
4718 Points ∼75% +9%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
4325 Points ∼69%
Gigabyte Aero 15
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11
4248 Points ∼68% -2%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3759 Points ∼60% -13%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
3651 Points ∼58% -16%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5348 Points ∼75% +115%
Gigabyte Aero 15
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11
5290 Points ∼74% +113%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4856 Points ∼68% +95%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
4746 Points ∼67% +91%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
2484 Points ∼35%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 15t-ce000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
6901 Points ∼59%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4723 Points ∼41% -32%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
4608 Points ∼40% -33%
PCMark 10
Score
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4861 Points ∼55% +22%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4406 Points ∼50% +11%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
3995 Points ∼46% +1%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
3969 Points ∼45%
Essentials
HP Omen 15t-ce000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
8656 Points ∼75%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
8191 Points ∼71% -5%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
7364 Points ∼64% -15%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
6569 Points ∼57% -24%
Productivity
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
7095 Points ∼64% +30%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
6458 Points ∼58% +18%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
6094 Points ∼55% +12%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
5454 Points ∼49%
Digital Content Creation
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5367 Points ∼35% +49%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4883 Points ∼31% +36%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
4132 Points ∼27% +15%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
3595 Points ∼23%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4325 puntos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
6901 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
2484 puntos
PCMark 10 Score
3969 puntos
ayuda
HP Omen 15t-ce000
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Aorus X5 v7
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
AS SSD
-9%
32%
-436%
133%
Copy Game MB/s
735.83
197.25
-73%
382.5
-48%
988.03
34%
1134.11
54%
Copy Program MB/s
195.39
127.31
-35%
274.82
41%
424.4
117%
534.36
173%
Copy ISO MB/s
1086.72
497.62
-54%
813.67
-25%
1481.99
36%
1936.38
78%
Score Total
1515
1434
-5%
2405
59%
490
-68%
3781
150%
Score Write
361
368
2%
594
65%
24
-93%
1556
331%
Score Read
789
746
-5%
1241
57%
361
-54%
1493
89%
Access Time Write *
0.034
0.032
6%
0.037
-9%
1.987
-5744%
0.026
24%
Access Time Read *
0.071
0.07
1%
0.058
18%
0.067
6%
0.04
44%
4K-64 Write
175.85
158.62
-10%
375.82
114%
2.12
-99%
1262.39
618%
4K-64 Read
568.28
463.24
-18%
928.7
63%
112.54
-80%
1206.47
112%
4K Write
111.16
127.92
15%
100.19
-10%
2.03
-98%
141.05
27%
4K Read
43.09
46.98
9%
46.95
9%
38.45
-11%
51.93
21%
Seq Write
743.4
813.85
9%
1180.85
59%
200.29
-73%
1530.14
106%
Seq Read
1774.03
2362.43
33%
2651.5
49%
2103.02
19%
2342.26
32%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
Sequential Read: 1411 MB/s
Sequential Write: 748.8 MB/s
512K Read: 503.3 MB/s
512K Write: 174 MB/s
4K Read: 46.09 MB/s
4K Write: 130.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 517.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 173.9 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Aorus X5 v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK
22241 Points ∼36% +71%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
14942 Points ∼24% +15%
Gigabyte Aero 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
14265 Points ∼23% +10%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
13279 Points ∼22% +2%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-7300HQ
13075 Points ∼21% +1%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
12970 Points ∼21%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-7300HQ
9904 Points ∼16% -24%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Aorus X5 v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK
10574 Points ∼44% +17%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
9007 Points ∼37%
Gigabyte Aero 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
8966 Points ∼37% 0%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
8762 Points ∼36% -3%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
7957 Points ∼33% -12%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-7300HQ
6406 Points ∼26% -29%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-7300HQ
6264 Points ∼26% -30%
3DMark
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-7300HQ
2252 Points ∼17% +2%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
2210 Points ∼17%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-7300HQ
1807 Points ∼14% -18%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-7300HQ
4851 Points ∼18% +4%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
4672 Points ∼18%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-7300HQ
3670 Points ∼14% -21%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Aorus X5 v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK
16349 Points ∼32% +64%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
11494 Points ∼23% +15%
Gigabyte Aero 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
11173 Points ∼22% +12%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
10349 Points ∼20% +4%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-7300HQ
10263 Points ∼20% +3%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
9992 Points ∼20%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-7300HQ
7795 Points ∼15% -22%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Aorus X5 v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK
97489 Points ∼48% +128%
Gigabyte Aero 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
77755 Points ∼38% +82%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-7300HQ
73603 Points ∼36% +72%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
73391 Points ∼36% +72%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
66973 Points ∼33% +57%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-7300HQ
51473 Points ∼25% +20%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
42781 Points ∼21%
3DMark 11 Performance
11761 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
21508 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
8725 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
4487 puntos
ayuda
Rise of the Tomb Raider
3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x (ordenar por valor)
HP Omen 15t-ce000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
24 fps ∼19%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
23.5 fps ∼18% -2%
Aorus X5 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
36.52 fps ∼29% +52%
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x (ordenar por valor)
HP Omen 15t-ce000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
54.6 fps ∼22%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
55.4 fps ∼22% +1%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
60.7 fps ∼24% +11%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
51.1 fps ∼20% -6%
Aorus X5 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
96.93 fps ∼38% +78%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
17.6 fps ∼7% -68%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x (ordenar por valor)
HP Omen 15t-ce000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
67.6 fps ∼25%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
67.5 fps ∼25% 0%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
74.5 fps ∼27% +10%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
65.6 fps ∼24% -3%
Aorus X5 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
117.74 fps ∼43% +74%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
23.1 fps ∼8% -66%
The Witcher 3
3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) (ordenar por valor)
HP Omen 15t-ce000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
23.7 fps ∼16%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
22.9 fps ∼15% -3%
Aorus X5 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
39.19 fps ∼26% +65%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) (ordenar por valor)
HP Omen 15t-ce000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
35 fps ∼20%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
25.6 fps ∼15% -27%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
35.2 fps ∼20% +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11
37.7 fps ∼22% +8%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
38.3 fps ∼22% +9%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
34.6 fps ∼20% -1%
Aorus X5 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
61.1 fps ∼35% +75%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
12.8 fps ∼7% -63%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) (ordenar por valor)
HP Omen 15t-ce000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
68.5 fps ∼20%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
47.8 fps ∼14% -30%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
73.4 fps ∼22% +7%
Gigabyte Aero 15
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11
68.2 fps ∼20% 0%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
68 fps ∼20% -1%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
63.2 fps ∼19% -8%
Aorus X5 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
86.81 fps ∼26% +27%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
22.8 fps ∼7% -67%
BioShock Infinite
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (ordenar por valor)
HP Omen 15t-ce000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
102.4 fps ∼39%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
70 fps ∼26% -32%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
95.3 fps ∼36% -7%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
88 fps ∼33% -14%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
34.8 fps ∼13% -66%
1366x768 High Preset (ordenar por valor)
HP Omen 15t-ce000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
180.1 fps ∼44%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
165.2 fps ∼40% -8%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
128 fps ∼31% -29%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
94.3 fps ∼23% -48%
1366x768 Medium Preset (ordenar por valor)
HP Omen 15t-ce000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
193.3 fps ∼44%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
188.5 fps ∼43% -2%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
142 fps ∼32% -27%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
112.9 (94.3min - 34.8max) fps ∼25% -42%
bajo medio alto ultra4K
Dirt 3 (2011) 140.1 126.3 112.2 64.5 fps
Sleeping Dogs (2012) 218.4 192.7 164.7 69.5 fps
Hitman: Absolution (2012) 105.8 101 88.7 70 fps
Tomb Raider (2013) 308.4 277.7 170.5 115.6 fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 209 193.3 180.1 102.4 fps
GRID 2 (2013) 210.8 152.8 143.3 116.7 fps
Company of Heroes 2 (2013) 68.9 65.7 63.4 40 fps
Thief (2014) 117.2 112 107.6 69 fps
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014) 170.2 139.9 96.7 76.9 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 172.3 133.8 68.5 35 23.7 fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 148.1 117.8 67.6 54.6 24 fps
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 75.8 62.2 53.2 20.8 fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 110.3 93 52 27.6 16.3 fps
Prey (2017) 116 92.9 80.2 30.7 fps
Ark Survival Evolved (2017) 109 48 35.5 25.6 8.5 fps
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) 128 81 62 46 27 fps
ELEX (2017) 108.1 83.5 69.6 57.2 17 fps
0123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra

Ruido

Ocioso
30.4 / 30.4 / 30.5 dB(A)
Carga
38.5 / 49 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1 (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 28.2 dB(A)
HP Omen 15t-ce000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Gigabyte Aero 15
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Aorus X5 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
Noise
-1%
7%
-7%
-5%
-8%
-18%
off / environment *
28.2
30.6
-9%
28
1%
31
-10%
30.4
-8%
30
-6%
30
-6%
Idle Minimum *
30.4
31.9
-5%
28
8%
32
-5%
30.9
-2%
30
1%
35
-15%
Idle Average *
30.4
31.9
-5%
28
8%
33
-9%
30.9
-2%
33
-9%
36
-18%
Idle Maximum *
30.5
31.9
-5%
28
8%
34
-11%
31.5
-3%
37
-21%
40
-31%
Load Average *
38.5
34.6
10%
30.3
21%
39
-1%
40.7
-6%
41
-6%
43
-12%
Witcher 3 ultra *
37.6
39.3
-5%
39.5
-5%
43
-14%
45.5
-21%
42
-12%
49
-30%
Load Maximum *
49
41.7
15%
46.5
5%
50
-2%
43.9
10%
50
-2%
55
-12%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

 40.2 °C46 °C40 °C 
 36.6 °C45.6 °C35.6 °C 
 30 °C28.8 °C31 °C 
Máximo: 46 °C
Médio: 37.1 °C
42.5 °C49.2 °C40.2 °C
30 °C46 °C32 °C
29.8 °C27 °C27.2 °C
Máximo: 49.2 °C
Médio: 36 °C
Conector de corriente  42.4 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 22.8 °C | Raytek Raynger ST
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.6 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 42.9 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.6 °C / 92 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 33.6 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.839.12536.636.53133.434.84032.933.65031.832.26330.831.18029.731.710029.630.112528.529.216027.438.820027.153.225026.458.33152657.44002558.950024.353.563024.360.780024.365.5100024.262.9125023.960.7160023.561.5200023.257.2250023.158315022.754.4400023.155.5500022.963.2630022.764.7800022.463.31000022.5621250022.465.11600022.554.3SPL35.673.4N2.533.1median 23.9median 58.3Delta1.34.735.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Omen 15t-ce000Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HP Omen 15t-ce000 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (65.45 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.33 / 0.64 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 15.4 / 22.4 / 22.4 Watt
Carga midlight 78.1 / 133.52 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
HP Omen 15t-ce000
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Gigabyte Aero 15
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035, AH-IPS, Normally Black, Transmissive, 1920x1080, 15.60
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Aorus X5 v7
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60
Power Consumption
39%
39%
4%
15%
-13%
-58%
Idle Minimum *
15.4
5.2
66%
7.1
54%
12
22%
7.2
53%
18
-17%
26
-69%
Idle Average *
22.4
8.3
63%
7.6
66%
15
33%
10.5
53%
23
-3%
31
-38%
Idle Maximum *
22.4
10.1
55%
8.6
62%
20
11%
16
29%
30
-34%
36
-61%
Load Average *
78.1
62.7
20%
59.5
24%
82
-5%
82
-5%
85
-9%
93
-19%
Witcher 3 ultra *
97.5
94
4%
89
9%
111
-14%
124
-27%
96
2%
176
-81%
Load Maximum *
133.52
100
25%
112.8
16%
161
-21%
155
-16%
158
-18%
240
-80%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
4h 58min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
3h 28min
Carga (máximo brillo)
1h 23min
HP Omen 15t-ce000
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 70 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 45 Wh
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 56 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 94.24 Wh
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 69 Wh
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 70 Wh
Aorus X5 v7
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 94 Wh
Duración de Batería
53%
79%
84%
71%
-8%
-19%
Reader / Idle
298
634
113%
659
121%
638
114%
501
68%
256
-14%
208
-30%
WiFi v1.3
208
310
49%
416
100%
422
103%
357
72%
198
-5%
151
-27%
Load
83
81
-2%
96
16%
112
35%
144
73%
80
-4%
84
1%

Pro

+ display 4K de primera, muy brillante
+ buen espectro de color
+ estilo único
+ buenos dispositivos de entrada
+ rendimiento muy aceptable
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ almacenamiento dual (PCIe SSD + HDD)

Contra

- muy poco aguante de batería
- bastante cálido y ruidoso a pesar del diseño Max-Q
- ruido de ventilador molesto
- adaptador de corriente ridículamente pesado
- tapa de display frágil
- notable sangrado de pantalla / clouding
HP Omen 15t-ce000. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de  Computer Upgrade King
HP Omen 15t-ce000. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Computer Upgrade King

No es muy difícil encontrarle fallos a los portátiles gaming más baratos, ya que el fabricante tiene que hacer equilibrios entre materiales relativamente baratos, buen aspecto, y hardware bastante potente para poder atraer al mayor número de usuarios posibles. Estamos tentados de criticar al Omen 15 por su concha metálica superior de bordes afilados, el notable sangrado de pantalla, o el molesto ventilador. Pero ninguno de los defectos es para echarse atrás en lo que a un sistema gaming se refiere: con todo, el HP Omen 15 es un sistema Max-Q asequible con bastantes redaños para manejar muchos títulos actuales al menos a Full HD. 

El diseño más reciente con su estilo más descarado puede que no sea del gusto de todos, pero no cabe duda que la calidad de la construcción en sí es decente con buena rigidez torsional de la base y un lecho de teclado que no cede apenas. Los dispositivos de entrada funcionan bien, el hardware tiene potencia, y el brillante display UHD IPS - especialmente después del calibrado - es bastante increíble para el precio. El Omen 15 se calienta bastante, pero no tanto como otros sistemas. Los ventiladores, empero, son bastante molestos, ya que giran frecuentemente, y suelen producir un sonido oscilante que pone los nervios de punta.

Los usuarios que busquen un portátil gaming asequible de gama baja-media con display 4K deberían tener en su lista de candidatos al Omen 15. 

El Dell Inspiron 15 tiene un display inferior, pero un rendimiento muy decente y aguanta el doble con una carga de batería. 

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

HP Omen 15t-ce000 - 12/01/2017 v6(old)
Bernhard Pechlaner

Acabado
78 / 98 → 79%
Teclado
79%
Ratón
75%
Conectividad
65 / 81 → 80%
Peso
59 / 10-66 → 87%
Battería
72%
Pantalla
88%
Rendimiento de juegos
92%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
89%
Temperatura
86 / 95 → 90%
Ruido
84 / 90 → 93%
Audio
75%
Médio
78%
85%
Gaming - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Bernhard Pechlaner
Editor of the original article: Bernhard Pechlaner - Senior Tech Writer - 274 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2012
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del HP Omen 15t-ce000 (7700HQ, GTX 1060 Max-Q, UHD)
Bernhard Pechlaner, 2017-12- 4 (Update: 2017-12- 4)