Notebookcheck Logo

Breve análisis del HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV

Jugón ruidoso. La apariencia de un portátil multimedia y la GPU de una máquina de juego. Si bien es versátil, el sistema es mucho más ruidoso que el Ultrabook estándar, incluso con cargas bajas.
Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Skylake Windows
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV (Pavilion 17-ab Serie)
Procesador
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 4 x 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake
Adaptador gráfico
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M - 4 GB VRAM, Núcleo: 1097 MHz, Memoría: 5010 MHz, GDDR5, 359.37
Memoría
16 GB 
, 1300 MHz, DDR4, PC4-17000, Dual-Channel, 2x SODIMM
pantalla
17.30 pulgadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels 127 PPI, IPS, Name: AU Optronics B173HW01 V0, ID: AUO109D, lustroso: no
Placa base
Intel H170 (Skylake PCH-H)
Disco duro
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G, 128 GB 
, secundario: HGST HTS721010A9E630
Tarjeta de sonido
Intel Skylake PCH-H High Definition Audio Controller
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Conexiones: clavija headset 3.5mm, Card Reader: lector SD, Brightness Sensor
Equipamento de red
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0
Unidad óptica
HP DVDRW GUD1N
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 29.7 x 414 x 278.9
Battería
62 Wh Litio-Polimero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionales
Altavoces: altavoces Estéreo B&O, Teclado: Chiclet, Luz de Teclado: si, guía de inicio rápido, tarjeta de garantía y soporte, McAfee Security, , 12 Meses Garantía
Peso
2.953 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 526 g
Precio
1100 USD
Enlaces
HP Pagina de inicio
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

❌
423 mm 305 mm 28 mm 3.6 kg419 mm 280 mm 29 mm 2.4 kg415 mm 270 mm 32 mm 3 kg421 mm 290 mm 25 mm 3.2 kg418.8 mm 286.8 mm 27.1 mm 2.7 kg414 mm 278.9 mm 29.7 mm 3 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U)
 
135 MB/s +104%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2013-10
 
78 MB/s +18%
Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935)
 
78 MB/s +18%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
 
66.1 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U)
 
210 MB/s +183%
Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935)
 
87 MB/s +17%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
 
74.3 MB/s
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U)
Dell Wireless 1820A 802.11ac
579 MBit/s
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Broadcom 802.11ac
570 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U)
Dell Wireless 1820A 802.11ac
461 MBit/s
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Broadcom 802.11ac
397 MBit/s
289.7
cd/m²		298.3
cd/m²		289.4
cd/m²
282.6
cd/m²		327.2
cd/m²		286.3
cd/m²
300.6
cd/m²		306.3
cd/m²		288.9
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Máximo: 327.2 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 296.6 cd/m² Minimum: 13.5 cd/m²
iluminación: 86 %
Brillo con batería: 327.2 cd/m²
Contraste: 1128:1 (Negro: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.03 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
87.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
88.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080		Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0
IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080		HP Pavilion 17-g120ng
Samsung_SDC3854, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080		Gigabyte P57W
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF1 (LGD0469), IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080		Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T
IPS, 15.60, 3840x2160
Display
-1%
6%
-2%
1%
Display P3 Coverage
64.3
67.4
5%
65.7
2%
66.5
3%
64.3
0%
sRGB Coverage
88.1
84.8
-4%
97.6
11%
84.4
-4%
89.9
2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
64.4
62
-4%
67.7
5%
61.7
-4%
65.4
2%
Response Times
-42%
-91%
-1%
-16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
31.2 ?(15.2, 16)
51.6 ?(20, 31.6)
-65%
70 ?(32, 38)
-124%
37 ?(13, 24)
-19%
43.2 ?(18, 25.2)
-38%
Response Time Black / White *
29.2 ?(6, 23.2)
34.4 ?(5.2, 29.2)
-18%
46 ?(16, 30)
-58%
24 ?(5, 19)
18%
27.2 ?(7.6, 19.6)
7%
PWM Frequency
200 ?(50)
Screen
-13%
-27%
-28%
-53%
Brightness middle
327.2
349.7
7%
309
-6%
286
-13%
252.9
-23%
Brightness
297
332
12%
292
-2%
274
-8%
250
-16%
Brightness Distribution
86
90
5%
86
0%
87
1%
89
3%
Black Level *
0.29
0.304
-5%
0.27
7%
0.31
-7%
0.5
-72%
Contrast
1128
1150
2%
1144
1%
923
-18%
506
-55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.03
3.99
-32%
4.53
-50%
4.49
-48%
5.22
-72%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.87
8.74
-27%
7.83
-14%
8.33
-21%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.8
3.34
-86%
5.66
-214%
4.76
-164%
6.74
-274%
Gamma
2.17 101%
2.23 99%
2.62 84%
2.47 89%
2.45 90%
CCT
6633 98%
6111 106%
7893 82%
6843 95%
6026 108%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57.2
55.8
-2%
62
8%
55
-4%
58.4
2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
87.6
84.8
-3%
98
12%
84
-4%
89.7
2%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
-19% / -14%
-37% / -29%
-10% / -19%
-23% / -37%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

ℹ
Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
   ↔    Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
29.2 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 6 ms subida
↘ 23.2 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 75 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21.5 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
   ↔    Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
31.2 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 15.2 ms subida
↘ 16 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 36 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (33.7 ms).

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 17900 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 3846000) Hz.

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10 | Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
166 Points +11%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
149 Points 0%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
149 Points
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
144 Points -3%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
136 Points -9%
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
131 Points -12%
Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N
Intel Core i7-6500U
110 Points -26%
CPU Multi 64Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
865 Points +27%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
719 Points +6%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
707 Points +4%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
679 Points
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
566 Points -17%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
468 Points -31%
Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N
Intel Core i7-6500U
284 Points -58%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
1.91 Points +19%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.7 Points +6%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
1.68 Points +4%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.61 Points
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
1.49 Points -7%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
1.49 Points -7%
Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N
Intel Core i7-6500U
1.26 Points -22%
CPU Multi 64Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
9.56 Points +28%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
7.96 Points +6%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
7.76 Points +4%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.48 Points
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
6.02 Points -20%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
5.42 Points -28%
Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N
Intel Core i7-6500U
3.11 Points -58%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
26150 Points +28%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
21681 Points +6%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
21022 Points +3%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20419 Points
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
16609 Points -19%
Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N
Intel Core i7-6500U
9478 Points -54%
Rendering Single 32Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
6487 Points +19%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
5671 Points +4%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
5567 Points +2%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5474 Points
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
5026 Points -8%
Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N
Intel Core i7-6500U
4198 Points -23%
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
395 s *
Asus G701VO-CS74K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
224.6 s *
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
206.3 s *
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
178.5 s *
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
631 s * -12%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
574 s * -2%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
563 s *
Asus G701VO-CS74K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
559 s * +1%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
498.3 s * +11%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
9471
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
20419
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5474
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.48 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
45.67 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.61 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
149 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
90.8 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
679 Points
ayuda
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
3753 Points +20%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
3700 Points +18%
Asus G501VW-FY081T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
3495 Points +12%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
3133 Points
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
3101 Points -1%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
4716 Points +2%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
4696 Points +2%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
4604 Points
Asus G501VW-FY081T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
4599 Points 0%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
3717 Points -19%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
4659 Points +27%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
4648 Points +27%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
4588 Points +25%
Asus G501VW-FY081T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
4445 Points +22%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
3658 Points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3133 puntos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3658 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4604 puntos
ayuda
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G		Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0
Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2		HP Pavilion 17-g120ng
Toshiba MQ01ABD100		Gigabyte P57W
Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G		Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T
Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
32%
-87%
52%
322%
Read Seq
517
513
-1%
104.6
-80%
491.6
-5%
1633
216%
Write Seq
185.1
156.3
-16%
96.3
-48%
391.1
111%
1579
753%
Read 512
319.3
435.6
36%
30.33
-91%
352.8
10%
1068
234%
Write 512
179.5
156.5
-13%
36.95
-79%
371.7
107%
1570
775%
Read 4k
20.99
36.89
76%
0.358
-98%
29.89
42%
50.4
140%
Write 4k
68.3
96.9
42%
0.815
-99%
37.75
-45%
128.6
88%
Read 4k QD32
144.6
358.8
148%
0.679
-100%
338.7
134%
534
269%
Write 4k QD32
169.8
138.9
-18%
0.79
-100%
278
64%
344
103%
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
AS SSD
hddimg
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
Sequential Read: 517 MB/s
Sequential Write: 185.1 MB/s
512K Read: 319.3 MB/s
512K Write: 179.5 MB/s
4K Read: 20.99 MB/s
4K Write: 68.3 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 144.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 169.8 MB/s
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
12472 Points +136%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
9824 Points +86%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ
7903 Points +49%
Lenovo Y700-15 80NV004LPB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
5311 Points 0%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
5289 Points
MSI PX60 6QD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ
4384 Points -17%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
8343 Points +51%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
7952 Points +44%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ
7182 Points +30%
Lenovo Y700-15 80NV004LPB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
5515 Points 0%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
5515 Points
MSI PX60 6QD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ
4501 Points -18%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
9608 Points +120%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
7321 Points +68%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ
5863 Points +34%
Lenovo Y700-15 80NV004LPB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
4368 Points 0%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
4361 Points
MSI PX60 6QD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ
3638 Points -17%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
4623 Points +127%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
3517 Points +73%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
2038 Points
3DMark 11 Performance
5576 puntos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
80214 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
15746 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3994 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
2009 puntos
ayuda
BioShock Infinite | Sleeping Dogs | Metro: Last Light | Thief | Batman: Arkham Knight | Metal Gear Solid V | Fallout 4 | Rise of the Tomb Raider
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
86.4 fps +92%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
69.5 fps +54%
Gigabyte P55K v5
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
52.4 fps +16%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
45 fps
MSI PX60 6QD
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ
39 fps -13%
Sleeping Dogs - 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:Extreme
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
57.5 fps +137%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
44.9 fps +85%
Gigabyte P55K v5
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
32.9 fps +35%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
24.3 fps
Metro: Last Light - 1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
50.5 fps +62%
Gigabyte P55K v5
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
39.2 fps +26%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
31.2 fps
Thief - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
58.6 fps +106%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
47.5 fps +67%
Gigabyte P55K v5
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
34.8 fps +23%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
28.4 fps
Batman: Arkham Knight - 1920x1080 High / On AA:SM AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
36 fps +57%
Gigabyte P55K v5
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
24 fps +4%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
23 fps
Metal Gear Solid V - 1920x1080 Extra High / On
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
60 fps +58%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
60 fps +58%
Gigabyte P55K v5
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
47.1 fps +24%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
37.9 fps
Fallout 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
57.9 fps +136%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
43.5 fps +78%
Gigabyte P55K v5
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
30.7 fps +25%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
24.5 fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
55 fps +127%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
42.8 fps +77%
Gigabyte P55K v5
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
28.3 fps +17%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
24.2 fps
bajo medio alto ultra
Sleeping Dogs (2012) 91.3 24.3
BioShock Infinite (2013) 117.9 45
Metro: Last Light (2013) 59.3 31.2
Thief (2014) 55.5 28.4
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 34 23
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) 56.1 37.9
Fallout 4 (2015) 30.6 24.5
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 30.2 24.2
Overwatch (2016) 39.4

Ruido

Ocioso
34.6 / 34.8 / 35.5 dB(A)
DVD
39.4 / dB(A)
Carga
45.4 / 52.3 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G		Lenovo Ideapad Y700-17 80QK7709PB
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB		HP Pavilion 17-g120ng
GeForce 940M, 6500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100		Gigabyte P57W
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G		Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
Noise
9%
5%
6%
14%
off / environment *
29
30
-3%
Idle Minimum *
34.6
31.4
9%
33.5
3%
32
8%
28.9
16%
Idle Average *
34.8
31.4
10%
33.5
4%
33
5%
28.9
17%
Idle Maximum *
35.5
34.3
3%
33.5
6%
37
-4%
30.2
15%
Load Average *
45.4
41.3
9%
45
1%
37
19%
41.8
8%
Load Maximum *
52.3
44
16%
47
10%
47
10%
43.9
16%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.
 27 °C43.6 °C50 °C 
 27.2 °C48.8 °C33 °C 
 26 °C31.6 °C29.4 °C 
Máximo: 50 °C
Médio: 35.2 °C
44 °C32 °C26.2 °C
33.6 °C31.4 °C27.2 °C
28.8 °C32.8 °C27.4 °C
Máximo: 44 °C
Médio: 31.5 °C
Conector de corriente  49 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.3 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.6 °C / 88.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.7 °C / -4.9 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.338.32538.338.33134.234.24033.833.85033.633.66333.833.880343410031.931.912532.532.516039.739.720046.346.325053.953.931556.956.940056.856.850060.260.263061.861.880061.261.2100063.463.4125064.964.9160064.564.5200063.863.8250060.760.7315062.262.2400064.664.650006767630065.865.8800056.356.31000056.456.41250049.749.7160003636SPL75.475.4N36.536.5median 60.2median 60.2Delta7.87.835.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.445.635.736.945.643.135.635.343.143.441.140.543.442.141.139.142.138.236.435.638.232.93230.432.92827.328.42827.827.927.427.828.428.330.828.427.63135.227.629.134.43829.140.946.150.340.944.550.554.644.547.453.557.647.448.454.558.648.454.260.864.554.26267.871.76258.563.968.258.550.256.160.250.252.858.562.552.855.761.565.555.752.258.16252.255.761.565.255.755.961.865.555.947.453.25747.452.258.462.952.254.760.66554.755.962.166.255.955.661.665.155.652.558.36152.567.373.177.167.321.831.440.121.8median 52.2median 58.3median 62median 52.27.68.58.17.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AVApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzSCHENKER F516 Flex
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (66 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER F516 Flex audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.24 / 0.74 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 5.3 / 10.6 / 11.8 Watt
Carga midlight 70.9 / 119.8 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30		Lenovo Ideapad Y700-17 80QK7709PB
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30		HP Pavilion 17-g120ng
6500U, GeForce 940M, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30		Gigabyte P57W
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30		Asus Zenbook Pro UX501JW-FI218H
4720HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, SanDisk SD7SN3Q128G1002, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60
Power Consumption
-29%
22%
-65%
-67%
Idle Minimum *
5.3
4.3
19%
4.8
9%
11
-108%
15.6
-194%
Idle Average *
10.6
13.8
-30%
10.1
5%
17
-60%
20.5
-93%
Idle Maximum *
11.8
19.8
-68%
10.4
12%
22
-86%
21.2
-80%
Load Average *
70.9
115.9
-63%
45.4
36%
85
-20%
75.8
-7%
Load Maximum *
119.8
123.5
-3%
63
47%
178
-49%
72.9
39%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
12h 31min
WiFi Websurfing
5h 56min
Carga (máximo brillo)
1h 39min
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, 62 Wh		Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, 60 Wh		HP Pavilion 17-g120ng
6500U, GeForce 940M, 41 Wh		Gigabyte P57W
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, 75.81 Wh		Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, 96 Wh
Duración de Batería
-7%
-28%
-15%
5%
Reader / Idle
751
688
-8%
460
-39%
689
-8%
WiFi v1.3
356
334
-6%
256
-28%
334
-6%
379
6%
Load
99
91
-8%
99
0%
117
18%

Pro

+ display brillante; buenos colores sin calibrado
+ opciones de almacenamiento SATA III M.2 y 2.5"
+ buen aguante de batería; soporte Optimus
+ veloz rendimiento CPU y GPU
+ batería extraíble
+ unidad óptica

Contra

- sin G-Sync, teclas Macro, USB Type-C, DisplayPort, NVMe, o Thunderbolt 3
- la tapa del display podría ser más rígida
- mal touchpad; teclas de cursor pequeñas
- mantenibilidad complicada
- ventilador ruidoso
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de CUKUSA.com
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de CUKUSA.com

El último Pavilion 17 está a medio camino entre un portátil multimedia y uno de juego. Es más potente de lo que su modesto diseño de plástico sugeriría, y es relativamente portable visto el tamaño de su pantalla. Esto hace que el portátil sea una solución polivalente para los que quieran la GPU Nvidia GTX y la pantalla más grande sin sacrificar demasiado en el peso.

Deja a un lado la graica y tienes básicamente un portátil barebones. Al sistema le falta un amplio abanico de opciones de conectividad y caracerísticas de primera que aparecen en otros portátiles de juego como G-Sync y un subwoofer e incluso le falta algo que aparece en los Ultrabooks como USB Type-C y NVMe. El ventilador es ruidoso incluso para un portátil de juego en parte debido a sus potentes entrañas, su diseño relativamente delgado, y su solución de único ventilador. Sólo podemos recomendar el Pavilion 17 y su GPU GTX 960M si el tamaño de su pantalla, su portabilidad, precio y potencia gráfica son más prioritarias que las características extra, la mantenibilidad, el mantenimiento, y un ventilador silencioso.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV - 08/16/2016 v5.1(old)
Allen Ngo

Acabado
72 / 98 → 74%
Teclado
73%
Ratón
64%
Conectividad
52 / 81 → 64%
Peso
57 / 10-66 → 84%
Battería
88%
Pantalla
89%
Rendimiento de juegos
82%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
86%
Temperatura
90 / 95 → 95%
Ruido
65 / 90 → 72%
Audio
50%
Cámara
42 / 85 → 50%
Médio
70%
76%
Gaming - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
Allen Ngo, 2016-08-24 (Update: 2020-06- 8)