Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del Smartphone Coolpad Modena 2

Marcus Herbrich, Manuel Masiero (traducido por Fernando Alvarez Ude), 11/19/2016

Cool Pad. El sucesor del asequible Modena hace honor al nombre de su fabricante Coolpad - el Modena 2 es uno de los teléfonos más "frescos" (cool) que hemos analizado hasta ahora. ¿Tiene algo más que ofrecer aparte de mantener una buena temperatura? Averigüemoslo.

Coolpad Modena 2 (Modena Serie)
Procesador
Adaptador gráfico
Memoría
2048 MB 
pantalla
5.5 pulgadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels 267 PPI, capacitiva, multitáctil, LCD, IPS, lustroso: si
Disco duro
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.2 GB libre
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, Audio Conexiones: puerto de auriculares de 3.5 mm, Card Reader: MicroSD (hasta 32 GB), Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Proximidad, Acelerómetro, Magnetómetro
Equipamento de red
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.1, 2G GSM: 900/1800/1900 MHz ; 3G HSPA+: 900/2100 MHz; 4G LTE FDD: 1 (2100), 3 (1800), 8 (900), 7 (2600) 20 (800), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 7.85 x 154.5 x 76.5
Battería
2500 mAh Litio-Ion, Duración de la Batería (según el fabricante): 180 h, Tiempo de Conversación 3G (según el fabricante): 4 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix LED Flash, Sensor Sony IMX219, Autofocus, f/2.2, HDR
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.2, HDR
Características adicionales
Altavoces: Mono, Teclado: En pantalla, Luz de Teclado: si, adaptador de corriente modular, cable USB, CoolUI 8.0, 24 Meses Garantía, SAR desconocido, fanless
Peso
143 g, Suministro de Electricidad: 43 g
Precio
180 Euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

154.5 mm 76.5 mm 7.85 mm 143 g153 mm 77.5 mm 8.6 mm 158 g151 mm 77 mm 8.5 mm 202 g150.8 mm 75 mm 8.5 mm 199 g144.4 mm 72 mm 9.9 mm 137 g145 mm 72 mm 9 mm 148 g143.8 mm 70.2 mm 8.3 mm 135 g139 mm 67.8 mm 7.9 mm 119 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
UMI Max
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
103 MBit/s ∼100% +131%
Coolpad Modena 2
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
44.5 MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
UMI Max
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
98.8 MBit/s ∼100% +104%
Coolpad Modena 2
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
48.4 MBit/s ∼49%
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Moto Z
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
491 MBit/s ∼100%
UMI Super Euro Edition
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
109 MBit/s ∼22%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45.6 MBit/s ∼9%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Moto Z
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
360 MBit/s ∼100%
UMI Super Euro Edition
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
108 MBit/s ∼30%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.7 MBit/s ∼13%

Comparación de Imágenes

Elige una escena y navega dentro de la primera imagen. Un click cambia el nivel de zoom. Un click en la imagen aumentada abre la original en una ventana nueva. La primera imagen muestra la fotografía escalada del dispositivo de pruebas.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click para cargar imágenes
479
cd/m²
484
cd/m²
499
cd/m²
463
cd/m²
482
cd/m²
478
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
465
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
LCD
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 499 cd/m² Médio: 468 cd/m² Minimum: 10.73 cd/m²
iluminación: 86 %
Brillo con batería: 482 cd/m²
Contraste: 765:1 (Negro: 0.63 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.5 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 7.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
Gamma: 1.91
Coolpad Modena 2
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Coolpad Modena
IPS, 960x540, 5.5
UMI Max
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
UMI Super Euro Edition
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Coolpad Torino S
IPS, 1280x720, 4.7
Archos 50 Power
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Lenovo Moto Z
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Screen
12%
30%
29%
11%
1%
5%
11%
34%
Brightness middle
482
345
-28%
522
8%
418
-13%
312
-35%
360
-25%
304
-37%
412
-15%
485
1%
Brightness
468
338
-28%
498
6%
410
-12%
302
-35%
358
-24%
311
-34%
414
-12%
490
5%
Brightness Distribution
86
93
8%
86
0%
85
-1%
79
-8%
87
1%
83
-3%
94
9%
92
7%
Black Level *
0.63
0.29
54%
0.23
63%
0.31
51%
0.15
76%
0.45
29%
0.31
51%
0.42
33%
Contrast
765
1190
56%
2270
197%
1348
76%
2080
172%
800
5%
981
28%
981
28%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.5
5.59
14%
6.9
-6%
4.4
32%
8.2
-26%
6.8
-5%
5.9
9%
5.6
14%
2.1
68%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
12.4
10.58
15%
12.3
1%
6.5
48%
16.5
-33%
11.3
9%
14.3
-15%
9.7
22%
5.5
56%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.3
6.75
8%
9.2
-26%
3.6
51%
9.2
-26%
6.2
15%
4.6
37%
6.9
5%
2.6
64%
Gamma
1.91 115%
2.38 92%
2.38 92%
2.36 93%
2.29 96%
2.14 103%
2.51 88%
2.4 92%
2.23 99%
CCT
7249 90%
8290 78%
8687 75%
6993 93%
9017 72%
7975 82%
7088 92%
8422 77%
6843 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
88.14
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
28 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 10 ms subida
↘ 18 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 59 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (25.1 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
58 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 36 ms subida
↘ 22 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 93 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (40 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 51 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 9457 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
Coolpad Modena 2
18.25 MB/s ∼21%
UMI Max
18.07 MB/s ∼21% -1%
UMI Super Euro Edition
17.88 MB/s ∼21% -2%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
12.62 MB/s ∼14% -31%
Coolpad Torino S
16.54 MB/s ∼19% -9%
Archos 50 Power
MB/s ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
51.1 MB/s ∼59% +180%
Lenovo Moto Z
45.64 MB/s ∼52% +150%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
Coolpad Modena 2
35.59 MB/s ∼37%
UMI Max
36.64 MB/s ∼38% +3%
UMI Super Euro Edition
36.22 MB/s ∼38% +2%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
22.77 MB/s ∼24% -36%
Coolpad Torino S
25.79 MB/s ∼27% -28%
Archos 50 Power
MB/s ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
65.5 MB/s ∼68% +84%
Lenovo Moto Z
78.51 MB/s ∼81% +121%
Random Write 4KB (ordenar por valor)
Coolpad Modena 2
6.79 MB/s ∼3%
Coolpad Modena
3.88 MB/s ∼2% -43%
UMI Max
10.91 MB/s ∼4% +61%
UMI Super Euro Edition
11.88 MB/s ∼5% +75%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
8.26 MB/s ∼3% +22%
Coolpad Torino S
6.94 MB/s ∼3% +2%
Archos 50 Power
8.78 MB/s ∼4% +29%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
28.31 MB/s ∼11% +317%
Lenovo Moto Z
74.93 MB/s ∼30% +1004%
Random Read 4KB (ordenar por valor)
Coolpad Modena 2
23.03 MB/s ∼13%
Coolpad Modena
11.97 MB/s ∼7% -48%
UMI Max
26.66 MB/s ∼15% +16%
UMI Super Euro Edition
28.17 MB/s ∼16% +22%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
18.24 MB/s ∼10% -21%
Coolpad Torino S
18.34 MB/s ∼10% -20%
Archos 50 Power
26.47 MB/s ∼15% +15%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
17.9 MB/s ∼10% -22%
Lenovo Moto Z
117.15 MB/s ∼67% +409%
Sequential Write 256KB (ordenar por valor)
Coolpad Modena 2
42.56 MB/s ∼8%
Coolpad Modena
7.73 MB/s ∼2% -82%
UMI Max
69.5 MB/s ∼14% +63%
UMI Super Euro Edition
126.95 MB/s ∼25% +198%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
70.33 MB/s ∼14% +65%
Coolpad Torino S
41.81 MB/s ∼8% -2%
Archos 50 Power
41.43 MB/s ∼8% -3%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
43.95 MB/s ∼9% +3%
Lenovo Moto Z
168.32 MB/s ∼33% +295%
Sequential Read 256KB (ordenar por valor)
Coolpad Modena 2
147.04 MB/s ∼10%
Coolpad Modena
121.99 MB/s ∼8% -17%
UMI Max
257.9 MB/s ∼18% +75%
UMI Super Euro Edition
257.8 MB/s ∼18% +75%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
187.34 MB/s ∼13% +27%
Coolpad Torino S
140.34 MB/s ∼10% -5%
Archos 50 Power
199.7 MB/s ∼14% +36%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
144.12 MB/s ∼10% -2%
Lenovo Moto Z
439.66 MB/s ∼30% +199%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Coolpad Modena 2
24875 Points ∼9%
Coolpad Modena
18230 Points ∼6% -27%
UMI Max
49057 Points ∼17% +97%
UMI Super Euro Edition
50072 Points ∼18% +101%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
23822 Points ∼8% -4%
Coolpad Torino S
22766 Points ∼8% -8%
Archos 50 Power
23996 Points ∼8% -4%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
28399 Points ∼10% +14%
Lenovo Moto Z
129197 Points ∼46% +419%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Coolpad Modena
1372 Points ∼4%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1147 Points ∼3%
Coolpad Torino S
1511 Points ∼4%
Archos 50 Power
1331 Points ∼4%
Lenovo Moto Z
5450 Points ∼14%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Coolpad Modena
471 Points ∼10%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
404 Points ∼8%
Coolpad Torino S
494 Points ∼10%
Archos 50 Power
471 Points ∼10%
Lenovo Moto Z
2080 Points ∼42%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Coolpad Modena 2
1274 Points ∼5%
UMI Max
2701 Points ∼10% +112%
UMI Super Euro Edition
2818 Points ∼10% +121%
Lenovo Moto Z
3946 Points ∼14% +210%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Coolpad Modena 2
459 Points ∼8%
UMI Max
734 Points ∼13% +60%
UMI Super Euro Edition
727 Points ∼13% +58%
Lenovo Moto Z
1480 Points ∼26% +222%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordenar por valor)
Coolpad Modena 2
621 Points ∼14%
UMI Max
1239 Points ∼28% +100%
UMI Super Euro Edition
1144 Points ∼26% +84%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
618 Points ∼14% 0%
Coolpad Torino S
735 Points ∼17% +18%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
716 Points ∼16% +15%
Lenovo Moto Z
1828 Points ∼41% +194%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Coolpad Modena 2
106 Points ∼1%
UMI Max
521 Points ∼5% +392%
UMI Super Euro Edition
523 Points ∼5% +393%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
101 Points ∼1% -5%
Coolpad Torino S
41 Points ∼0% -61%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
42 Points ∼0% -60%
Lenovo Moto Z
3718 Points ∼35% +3408%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordenar por valor)
Coolpad Modena 2
130 Points ∼2%
Coolpad Modena
0 Points ∼0% -100%
UMI Max
598 Points ∼8% +360%
UMI Super Euro Edition
595 Points ∼8% +358%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
124 Points ∼2% -5%
Coolpad Torino S
52 Points ∼1% -60%
Archos 50 Power
122 Points ∼2% -6%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
53 Points ∼1% -59%
Lenovo Moto Z
3023 Points ∼39% +2225%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordenar por valor)
Coolpad Modena 2
7061 Points ∼8%
UMI Max
12239 Points ∼14% +73%
UMI Super Euro Edition
11654 Points ∼13% +65%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
7026 Points ∼8% 0%
Coolpad Torino S
9205 Points ∼11% +30%
Archos 50 Power
6981 Points ∼8% -1%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
9256 Points ∼11% +31%
Lenovo Moto Z
20948 Points ∼24% +197%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordenar por valor)
Coolpad Modena 2
2789 Points ∼1%
UMI Max
10612 Points ∼2% +280%
UMI Super Euro Edition
10567 Points ∼2% +279%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2645 Points ∼0% -5%
Coolpad Torino S
3858 Points ∼1% +38%
Archos 50 Power
2581 Points ∼0% -7%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
3858 Points ∼1% +38%
Lenovo Moto Z
26659 Points ∼5% +856%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordenar por valor)
Coolpad Modena 2
3222 Points ∼1%
UMI Max
10942 Points ∼5% +240%
UMI Super Euro Edition
10791 Points ∼5% +235%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
3070 Points ∼1% -5%
Coolpad Torino S
4430 Points ∼2% +37%
Archos 50 Power
3001 Points ∼1% -7%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4432 Points ∼2% +38%
Lenovo Moto Z
25135 Points ∼11% +680%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Coolpad Modena 2
5 fps ∼0%
UMI Max
17 fps ∼0% +240%
UMI Super Euro Edition
17 fps ∼0% +240%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
4.9 fps ∼0% -2%
Coolpad Torino S
9.8 fps ∼0% +96%
Archos 50 Power
4.9 fps ∼0% -2%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
5.2 fps ∼0% +4%
Lenovo Moto Z
77 fps ∼1% +1440%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Coolpad Modena 2
8.9 fps ∼0%
UMI Max
17 fps ∼1% +91%
UMI Super Euro Edition
18 fps ∼1% +102%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
8.2 fps ∼0% -8%
Coolpad Torino S
5.3 fps ∼0% -40%
Archos 50 Power
8.6 fps ∼0% -3%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
9.6 fps ∼0% +8%
Lenovo Moto Z
53 fps ∼2% +496%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Coolpad Modena 2
1.8 fps ∼0%
UMI Max
7.1 fps ∼1% +294%
UMI Super Euro Edition
7.1 fps ∼1% +294%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
3.4 fps ∼1% +89%
Coolpad Torino S
4.3 fps ∼1% +139%
Archos 50 Power
1.6 fps ∼0% -11%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
1.8 fps ∼0% 0%
Lenovo Moto Z
41 fps ∼7% +2178%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Coolpad Modena 2
4 fps ∼1%
UMI Max
7.1 fps ∼2% +78%
UMI Super Euro Edition
7.5 fps ∼2% +88%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1.8 fps ∼0% -55%
Coolpad Torino S
1.8 fps ∼0% -55%
Archos 50 Power
3.6 fps ∼1% -10%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4.1 fps ∼1% +3%
Lenovo Moto Z
26 fps ∼7% +550%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
Coolpad Modena 2
2.9 fps ∼0%
UMI Max
4.7 fps ∼0% +62%
UMI Super Euro Edition
4.7 fps ∼0% +62%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2.5 fps ∼0% -14%
Archos 50 Power
0.87 fps ∼0% -70%
Lenovo Moto Z
27 fps ∼1% +831%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
Coolpad Modena 2
1.2 fps ∼0%
UMI Max
4.7 fps ∼0% +292%
UMI Super Euro Edition
5.1 fps ∼0% +325%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1.2 fps ∼0% 0%
Archos 50 Power
2.5 fps ∼0% +108%
Lenovo Moto Z
15 fps ∼0% +1150%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor)
Coolpad Modena 2
3119 Points ∼16%
Coolpad Modena
2966 Points ∼15% -5%
UMI Max
4485 Points ∼23% +44%
UMI Super Euro Edition
4596 Points ∼23% +47%
Coolpad Torino S
3932 Points ∼20% +26%
Archos 50 Power
2824 Points ∼14% -9%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4283 Points ∼22% +37%
Lenovo Moto Z
7637 Points ∼39% +145%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordenar por valor)
Coolpad Modena 2
565 Points ∼28%
Coolpad Modena
614 Points ∼30% +9%
UMI Max
10 Points ∼0% -98%
UMI Super Euro Edition
771 Points ∼38% +36%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
592 Points ∼29% +5%
Coolpad Torino S
599 Points ∼29% +6%
Archos 50 Power
9 Points ∼0% -98%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
551 Points ∼27% -2%
Lenovo Moto Z
959 Points ∼47% +70%
Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Coolpad Modena 2
178 Points ∼1%
Coolpad Modena
314 Points ∼1% +76%
UMI Max
666 Points ∼2% +274%
UMI Super Euro Edition
666 Points ∼2% +274%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
174 Points ∼1% -2%
Coolpad Torino S
321 Points ∼1% +80%
Archos 50 Power
173 Points ∼1% -3%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
313 Points ∼1% +76%
Lenovo Moto Z
4321 Points ∼15% +2328%
Memory (ordenar por valor)
Coolpad Modena 2
598 Points ∼8%
Coolpad Modena
262 Points ∼3% -56%
UMI Max
998 Points ∼13% +67%
UMI Super Euro Edition
1052 Points ∼14% +76%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
487 Points ∼6% -19%
Coolpad Torino S
607 Points ∼8% +2%
Archos 50 Power
643 Points ∼9% +8%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
741 Points ∼10% +24%
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points ∼29% +266%
System (ordenar por valor)
Coolpad Modena 2
909 Points ∼6%
Coolpad Modena
972 Points ∼6% +7%
UMI Max
2123 Points ∼13% +134%
UMI Super Euro Edition
2187 Points ∼13% +141%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
801 Points ∼5% -12%
Coolpad Torino S
1102 Points ∼7% +21%
Archos 50 Power
911 Points ∼6% 0%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
1035 Points ∼6% +14%
Lenovo Moto Z
3398 Points ∼21% +274%
Overall (ordenar por valor)
Coolpad Modena 2
483 Points ∼6%
Coolpad Modena
477 Points ∼6% -1%
UMI Max
341 Points ∼4% -29%
UMI Super Euro Edition
1043 Points ∼12% +116%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
448 Points ∼5% -7%
Coolpad Torino S
602 Points ∼7% +25%
Archos 50 Power
176 Points ∼2% -64%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
603 Points ∼7% +25%
Lenovo Moto Z
2356 Points ∼28% +388%
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Coolpad Modena 2
1975 Points ∼4%
Coolpad Modena
2721 Points ∼5% +38%
UMI Max
4231 Points ∼8% +114%
UMI Super Euro Edition
4117 Points ∼8% +108%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1910 Points ∼4% -3%
Coolpad Torino S
2364 Points ∼5% +20%
Archos 50 Power
2116 Points ∼4% +7%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2773 Points ∼5% +40%
Lenovo Moto Z
7771 Points ∼15% +293%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Coolpad Modena 2
13.15 Points ∼4%
Coolpad Modena
17.904 Points ∼5% +36%
UMI Max
25.502 Points ∼7% +94%
UMI Super Euro Edition
26.211 Points ∼7% +99%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
12.729 Points ∼4% -3%
Coolpad Torino S
14.453 Points ∼4% +10%
Archos 50 Power
13.16 Points ∼4% 0%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
17.094 Points ∼5% +30%
Lenovo Moto Z
47.5 Points ∼14% +261%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Coolpad Modena 2
19647.2 ms * ∼33%
Coolpad Modena
13569 ms * ∼23% +31%
UMI Max
9795.6 ms * ∼16% +50%
UMI Super Euro Edition
9410.2 ms * ∼16% +52%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
19234.4 ms * ∼32% +2%
Coolpad Torino S
15784.4 ms * ∼27% +20%
Archos 50 Power
18480.5 ms * ∼31% +6%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
12952.9 ms * ∼22% +34%
Lenovo Moto Z
3154.7 ms * ∼5% +84%

Leyenda

 
Coolpad Modena 2 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Coolpad Modena Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
UMI Max Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
UMI Super Euro Edition Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V7 Lite Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Coolpad Torino S Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Archos 50 Power Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto G4 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.
 30.7 °C30.3 °C28.8 °C 
 30.7 °C30.8 °C28.5 °C 
 30.8 °C30.6 °C28.6 °C 
Máximo: 30.8 °C
Médio: 30 °C
27.2 °C29 °C30.4 °C
27.6 °C28.6 °C31 °C
27.1 °C29.1 °C31.2 °C
Máximo: 31.2 °C
Médio: 29 °C
Conector de corriente  29.4 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.633.72525.428.63125.332.74032.930.25033.643.26331.633.68028.425.61002722.912520.822.51602226.320021.325.525020.831.931521.241.140019.448.550019.559.363017.76580017.969100017.875.5125017.375.6160017.474.2200016.775.8250017.273.9315018.272.5400017.972.3500017.675.9630017.775.8800017.876.21000017.976.61250018.1661600018.249.2SPL3086.1N1.363.5median 17.9median 69Delta1.316.631.644.525.435.225.336.532.932.133.641.231.631.628.435.32727.520.8242226.121.325.220.829.421.239.119.444.119.552.817.759.917.965.517.869.417.370.317.470.116.769.117.268.418.272.617.976.917.668.917.765.617.869.217.964.418.152.718.249.23082.41.348.5median 17.9median 64.41.314.236.331.432.436.334.429.331.334.431.632.231.731.635.134.12635.138.134.939.438.13132.536.23126.427.228.626.427.527.725.427.527.531.121.327.526.827.523.326.830.627.122.530.638.429.922.438.446.432.921.346.45240.318.45260.847.817.560.865.85517.565.870.661.817.270.67463.816.87473.96317.373.968.957.917.468.968.857.416.668.868.857.717.368.868.65717.668.668.255.217.668.268.453.817.768.469.85517.469.874.359.417.774.375.160.417.975.169.954.818.169.966.35118.166.382.670.729.882.653.425.61.353.4median 68.4median 55median 17.7median 68.410.98.91.610.917.919.719.617.919.618.619.519.617.617.521.317.62019.223.22017.715.620.717.715.516.621.915.517.218.214.417.218.120.315.918.128.930.425.328.91424.611.81414.929.511.914.916.432.413.516.418.934.214.718.922.238.813.422.225.843.914.425.83046.910.63036.853.1836.84056.98.94039.856.39.839.83956.183936.952.68.136.936.553.66.536.535.453.86.435.437.756.46.237.74058.15.74044595.74443.658.65.743.638.6545.838.63246.15.8322437.25.62451.167.620.851.17.121.20.37.1median 35.4median 52.6median 8.1median 35.4810.33.68hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseCoolpad Modena 2UMI MaxZTE Blade V7 LiteLenovo Moto G4 Play
Coolpad Modena 2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.12 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 40.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

UMI Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.43 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

ZTE Blade V7 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.62 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 14% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo Moto G4 Play audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.06 / 0.15 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.64 / 1.96 / 1.98 Watt
Carga midlight 4.99 / 5.48 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Coolpad Modena 2
2500 mAh
Coolpad Modena
2500 mAh
UMI Max
4000 mAh
UMI Super Euro Edition
4000 mAh
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2500 mAh
Coolpad Torino S
1800 mAh
Archos 50 Power
4000 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2800 mAh
Power Consumption
13%
14%
-19%
26%
6%
-48%
19%
Idle Minimum *
0.64
0.79
-23%
1.02
-59%
0.84
-31%
0.63
2%
0.68
-6%
1.66
-159%
0.68
-6%
Idle Average *
1.96
1.51
23%
1.53
22%
1.94
1%
1.37
30%
2.2
-12%
2.88
-47%
1.58
19%
Idle Maximum *
1.98
1.63
18%
1.62
18%
2.07
-5%
1.71
14%
2.26
-14%
3.46
-75%
1.61
19%
Load Average *
4.99
3.37
32%
2.91
42%
5.88
-18%
2.82
43%
3.47
30%
3.96
21%
3.36
33%
Load Maximum *
5.48
4.67
15%
2.93
47%
7.67
-40%
3.36
39%
3.71
32%
4.34
21%
3.91
29%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8h 38min
Coolpad Modena 2
2500 mAh
Coolpad Modena
2500 mAh
UMI Max
4000 mAh
UMI Super Euro Edition
4000 mAh
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2500 mAh
Coolpad Torino S
1800 mAh
Archos 50 Power
4000 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2800 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z
2600 mAh
Duración de Batería
WiFi v1.3
518
616
19%
588
14%
638
23%
517
0%
397
-23%
592
14%
630
22%
407
-21%

Pro

+ Bajas temperaturas
+ Brillante pantalla IPS
+ Buena duración de batería

Contra

- Chipset lento
- GPS poco preciso
- Almacenamiento eMMC lento
- Resolución baja (HD) para el tamaño de pantalla (5.5 pulgadas)
- Chasis de plástico
- Características limitadas
Análisis: Coolpad Modena 2. Modelo de prueba cedido por Coolpad Germany.

El Coolpad Modena 2 no está mal, pero los rivales ofrecen más por el mismo valor - este es nuestro veredicto breve y conciso. Comparado con su predecessor, el fabricante chino no ha mejorado ningún aspecto de forma correcta, porque algunos puntos como la duración de batería, el rendimiento de la GPU, el contraste y la precisión de color del panel IPS del Modena 2 son peores que antes. Creemos que la combinación de un SoC MediaTek de gama baja, 2 GB de RAM y almacenamiento eMMC lento no es suficientemente bueno para los 180 euros que cuesta.

Sigue ocurriendo lo mismo: La segunda generación de Modena no nos convence - la actualización no ofrece mejoras suficientes. 

El Coolpad Modena 2 no es una mala elección si buscas un smartphone LTE con una pantalla grande y brillante. Aún así tanto el UMi Max  como el Honor 5C ofrecen mejores características por un precio similar.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Coolpad Modena 2 - 11/08/2016 v5.1(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Acabado
79%
Teclado
63 / 75 → 84%
Ratón
82%
Conectividad
36 / 60 → 60%
Peso
93%
Battería
91%
Pantalla
80%
Rendimiento de juegos
7 / 63 → 11%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
29 / 70 → 41%
Temperatura
94%
Ruido
100%
Audio
53 / 91 → 58%
Cámara
59%
Médio
67%
79%
Smartphone - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Smartphone Coolpad Modena 2
Marcus Herbrich, 2016-11-19 (Update: 2016-11-19)