Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del Smartphone Doogee Shoot 1

Marcus Herbrich (traducido por Francisco García), 03/20/2017

¿Siempre son dos mejor que uno? Los sistemas de cámara dual ya no se limitan a los smartphones de gama alta - no en un año tan tecnológicamente sofisticado como el 2017. Ahora hasta los modelos básicos pueden presumir de cámaras traseras con dos módulos: entra el modelo Shoot 1 de Doogee. Pero ¿es la segunda cámara en el dispositivo low-cost un auténtico beneficio? Nuestro análisis exhaustivo revela la respuesta.

Doogee Shoot 1 (Shoot Serie)
Adaptador gráfico
Memoría
2048 MB 
pantalla
5.5 pulgadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixels 401 PPI, Capacitiva, Multi-táctil, Sharp LCD, IPS, 2.5D Arc, lustroso: si
Disco duro
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.4 GB libre
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, Audio Conexiones: 3.5mm Klinkenanschluss, Card Reader: microSD hasta 256GB, 1 Lector de Huellas Digitales, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: iluminación, brújula, geomagnético, gravedad, proximidad, lector de huellas, microUSB 2.0
Equipamento de red
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0, 2G:850/900/1800/1900MHz 3G:900/2100MHz 4G:FDD-LTE Bandas 1/3/7/8/20, Dual SIM, GPS
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 8.7 x 156.6 x 77
Battería
3300 mAh Litio-Ion, 5V2A carga rápida
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix 13MP+8MP cámara dual, flash LED dual, lente de 5 piezas, apertura f/2.2+2.4
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix gran ángular 87.8, antisacudidas
Características adicionales
Altavoces: Mono, Teclado: Virtual, Luz de Teclado: si, carcasa TPU, protector de pantalla, cable USB, cargador, Doogee UI, 12 Meses Garantía, fanless
Peso
167 g, Suministro de Electricidad: 63 g
Precio
110 Euros

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
279 MBit/s ∼100% +161%
Doogee Shoot 1
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
107 MBit/s ∼38%
ZTE Blade A510
Mali-T720, MT6735P, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 MBit/s ∼17% -54%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
185 MBit/s ∼100% +83%
Doogee Shoot 1
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
101 MBit/s ∼55%
ZTE Blade A510
Mali-T720, MT6735P, 8 GB eMMC Flash
47.9 MBit/s ∼26% -53%
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
249 MBit/s ∼100%
Ulefone Metal
Mali-T720, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
88.3 MBit/s ∼35%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
Mali-T720, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 MBit/s ∼20%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45.6 MBit/s ∼18%
TP-Link Neffos C5
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
44.9 MBit/s ∼18%
Wiko Lenny 3
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
44.8 MBit/s ∼18%
LG X Cam
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
41.8 MBit/s ∼17%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
205 MBit/s ∼100%
Ulefone Metal
Mali-T720, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
73.1 MBit/s ∼36%
LG X Cam
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.8 MBit/s ∼24%
TP-Link Neffos C5
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.3 MBit/s ∼24%
Wiko Lenny 3
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.2 MBit/s ∼24%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
Mali-T720, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.5 MBit/s ∼24%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.7 MBit/s ∼23%
GPS Doogee Shoot 1
GPS Doogee Shoot 1
GPS Doogee Shoot 1
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500

Comparación de Imágenes

Elige una escena y navega dentro de la primera imagen. Un click cambia el nivel de zoom. Un click en la imagen aumentada abre la original en una ventana nueva. La primera imagen muestra la fotografía escalada del dispositivo de pruebas.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click para cargar imágenes
442
cd/m²
477
cd/m²
477
cd/m²
442
cd/m²
488
cd/m²
472
cd/m²
432
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
464
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 488 cd/m² Médio: 462.3 cd/m² Minimum: 18.51 cd/m²
iluminación: 89 %
Brillo con batería: 488 cd/m²
Contraste: 2122:1 (Negro: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.4
Doogee Shoot 1
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
ZTE Blade A510
IPS, 1280x720, 5
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Ulefone Metal
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Wiko Lenny 3
IPS, 1280x720, 5
TP-Link Neffos C5
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
IPS, 1280x720, 5
LG X Cam
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Huawei P9
IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.2
Screen
-39%
-28%
-53%
-56%
-43%
-45%
-33%
-29%
-10%
Brightness
462
524
13%
302
-35%
349
-24%
315
-32%
343
-26%
491
6%
414
-10%
348
-25%
563
22%
Brightness Distribution
89
94
6%
79
-11%
89
0%
87
-2%
85
-4%
89
0%
94
6%
94
6%
91
2%
Black Level *
0.23
0.62
-170%
0.15
35%
0.65
-183%
0.56
-143%
0.47
-104%
0.58
-152%
0.42
-83%
0.25
-9%
0.38
-65%
Contrast
2122
852
-60%
2080
-2%
529
-75%
557
-74%
796
-62%
876
-59%
981
-54%
1448
-32%
1532
-28%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5
5.2
-4%
8.2
-64%
5.8
-16%
6.8
-36%
6
-20%
7
-40%
5.6
-12%
6.8
-36%
4.4
12%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.8
5.7
-19%
9.2
-92%
5.7
-19%
7.1
-48%
6.7
-40%
6.1
-27%
6.9
-44%
8.4
-75%
4.8
-0%
Gamma
2.4 100%
1.99 121%
2.29 105%
2.1 114%
2.77 87%
2.19 110%
2.15 112%
2.4 100%
2.22 108%
2.2 109%
CCT
7427 88%
6631 98%
9017 72%
7792 83%
7402 88%
8073 81%
8068 81%
8422 77%
8242 79%
6175 105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
77.78
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.44

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 55 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8587 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
30 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 7 ms subida
↘ 23 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 71 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (26.6 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
67 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 28 ms subida
↘ 39 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 96 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (42.5 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
Doogee Shoot 1
20 MB/s ∼23%
ZTE Blade A510
16.5 MB/s ∼19% -17%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
12.62 MB/s ∼14% -37%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
15.58 MB/s ∼18% -22%
Ulefone Metal
27.6 MB/s ∼32% +38%
Wiko Lenny 3
19.59 MB/s ∼22% -2%
TP-Link Neffos C5
18.89 MB/s ∼22% -6%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
51.1 MB/s ∼59% +156%
LG X Cam
19.3 MB/s ∼22% -3%
Huawei P9
24.83 MB/s ∼28% +24%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
Doogee Shoot 1
29.18 MB/s ∼30%
ZTE Blade A510
25.55 MB/s ∼26% -12%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
22.77 MB/s ∼24% -22%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
31.85 MB/s ∼33% +9%
Ulefone Metal
49.6 MB/s ∼51% +70%
Wiko Lenny 3
40.59 MB/s ∼42% +39%
TP-Link Neffos C5
39.11 MB/s ∼41% +34%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
65.5 MB/s ∼68% +124%
LG X Cam
37.13 MB/s ∼38% +27%
Huawei P9
55.05 MB/s ∼57% +89%
Random Write 4KB (ordenar por valor)
Doogee Shoot 1
7.32 MB/s ∼4%
ZTE Blade A510
4.69 MB/s ∼3% -36%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
8.26 MB/s ∼5% +13%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
4.35 MB/s ∼3% -41%
Ulefone Metal
7.87 MB/s ∼5% +8%
Wiko Lenny 3
6.2 MB/s ∼4% -15%
TP-Link Neffos C5
6.85 MB/s ∼4% -6%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
28.31 MB/s ∼17% +287%
LG X Cam
5.52 MB/s ∼3% -25%
Huawei P9
47.45 MB/s ∼29% +548%
Random Read 4KB (ordenar por valor)
Doogee Shoot 1
18.99 MB/s ∼11%
ZTE Blade A510
14.03 MB/s ∼8% -26%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
18.24 MB/s ∼11% -4%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
14.31 MB/s ∼8% -25%
Ulefone Metal
22.18 MB/s ∼13% +17%
Wiko Lenny 3
15.1 MB/s ∼9% -20%
TP-Link Neffos C5
17.16 MB/s ∼10% -10%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
17.9 MB/s ∼10% -6%
LG X Cam
18.07 MB/s ∼10% -5%
Huawei P9
39 MB/s ∼23% +105%
Sequential Write 256KB (ordenar por valor)
Doogee Shoot 1
47.49 MB/s ∼23%
ZTE Blade A510
9.94 MB/s ∼5% -79%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
70.33 MB/s ∼34% +48%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
7.56 MB/s ∼4% -84%
Ulefone Metal
39.91 MB/s ∼19% -16%
Wiko Lenny 3
11.6 MB/s ∼6% -76%
TP-Link Neffos C5
52.43 MB/s ∼25% +10%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
43.95 MB/s ∼21% -7%
LG X Cam
65.84 MB/s ∼32% +39%
Huawei P9
72.19 MB/s ∼35% +52%
Sequential Read 256KB (ordenar por valor)
Doogee Shoot 1
207.66 MB/s ∼26%
ZTE Blade A510
111.91 MB/s ∼14% -46%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
187.34 MB/s ∼24% -10%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
125.37 MB/s ∼16% -40%
Ulefone Metal
228.84 MB/s ∼29% +10%
Wiko Lenny 3
132.5 MB/s ∼17% -36%
TP-Link Neffos C5
145.77 MB/s ∼18% -30%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
144.12 MB/s ∼18% -31%
LG X Cam
201.55 MB/s ∼25% -3%
Huawei P9
281.26 MB/s ∼35% +35%
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Doogee Shoot 1
39275 Points ∼17%
ZTE Blade A510
24338 Points ∼11% -38%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
23822 Points ∼10% -39%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
23657 Points ∼10% -40%
Ulefone Metal
37103 Points ∼16% -6%
Wiko Lenny 3
25237 Points ∼11% -36%
TP-Link Neffos C5
32681 Points ∼14% -17%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
28399 Points ∼12% -28%
LG X Cam
35471 Points ∼16% -10%
Huawei P9
95743 Points ∼42% +144%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Doogee Shoot 1
1684 Points ∼6%
ZTE Blade A510
1195 Points ∼4% -29%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
1206 Points ∼4% -28%
Ulefone Metal
2458 Points ∼9% +46%
Huawei P9
4904 Points ∼18% +191%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Doogee Shoot 1
620 Points ∼11%
ZTE Blade A510
429 Points ∼7% -31%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
428 Points ∼7% -31%
Ulefone Metal
609 Points ∼11% -2%
Huawei P9
1755 Points ∼30% +183%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordenar por valor)
Doogee Shoot 1
852 Points ∼28%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
609 Points ∼20% -29%
Ulefone Metal
1084 Points ∼35% +27%
Wiko Lenny 3
Points ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5
796 Points ∼26% -7%
LG X Cam
1001 Points ∼33% +17%
Huawei P9
2503 Points ∼81% +194%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Doogee Shoot 1
141 Points ∼3%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
65 Points ∼1% -54%
Ulefone Metal
158 Points ∼3% +12%
Wiko Lenny 3
Points ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5
101 Points ∼2% -28%
LG X Cam
158 Points ∼3% +12%
Huawei P9
829 Points ∼15% +488%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordenar por valor)
Doogee Shoot 1
173 Points ∼4%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
81 Points ∼2% -53%
Ulefone Metal
195 Points ∼5% +13%
Wiko Lenny 3
Points ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5
125 Points ∼3% -28%
LG X Cam
194 Points ∼5% +12%
Huawei P9
974 Points ∼25% +463%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordenar por valor)
Doogee Shoot 1
874 Points ∼28%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
618 Points ∼20% -29%
Ulefone Metal
1057 Points ∼34% +21%
Wiko Lenny 3
Points ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5
810 Points ∼26% -7%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
716 Points ∼23% -18%
LG X Cam
1002 Points ∼33% +15%
Huawei P9
2510 Points ∼81% +187%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Doogee Shoot 1
218 Points ∼3%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
101 Points ∼1% -54%
Ulefone Metal
243 Points ∼3% +11%
Wiko Lenny 3
Points ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5
167 Points ∼2% -23%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
42 Points ∼1% -81%
LG X Cam
245 Points ∼3% +12%
Huawei P9
1080 Points ∼14% +395%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordenar por valor)
Doogee Shoot 1
282 Points ∼6%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
124 Points ∼2% -56%
Ulefone Metal
293 Points ∼6% +4%
Wiko Lenny 3
Points ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5
203 Points ∼4% -28%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
53 Points ∼1% -81%
LG X Cam
294 Points ∼6% +4%
Huawei P9
1237 Points ∼25% +339%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordenar por valor)
Doogee Shoot 1
9525 Points ∼13%
ZTE Blade A510
7025 Points ∼10% -26%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
7026 Points ∼10% -26%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
6902 Points ∼10% -28%
Ulefone Metal
10371 Points ∼14% +9%
Wiko Lenny 3
7849 Points ∼11% -18%
TP-Link Neffos C5
9291 Points ∼13% -2%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
9256 Points ∼13% -3%
LG X Cam
10234 Points ∼14% +7%
Huawei P9
15517 Points ∼22% +63%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordenar por valor)
Doogee Shoot 1
6115 Points ∼1%
ZTE Blade A510
2682 Points ∼1% -56%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2645 Points ∼1% -57%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2681 Points ∼1% -56%
Ulefone Metal
6469 Points ∼1% +6%
Wiko Lenny 3
2476 Points ∼1% -60%
TP-Link Neffos C5
4223 Points ∼1% -31%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
3858 Points ∼1% -37%
LG X Cam
6044 Points ∼1% -1%
Huawei P9
21577 Points ∼5% +253%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordenar por valor)
Doogee Shoot 1
6645 Points ∼3%
ZTE Blade A510
3109 Points ∼2% -53%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
3070 Points ∼2% -54%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
3103 Points ∼2% -53%
Ulefone Metal
7059 Points ∼4% +6%
Wiko Lenny 3
2920 Points ∼1% -56%
TP-Link Neffos C5
4906 Points ∼2% -26%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4432 Points ∼2% -33%
LG X Cam
6649 Points ∼3% 0%
Huawei P9
19854 Points ∼10% +199%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Doogee Shoot 1
11 fps ∼1%
ZTE Blade A510
4.9 fps ∼0% -55%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
4.9 fps ∼0% -55%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
8.7 fps ∼1% -21%
Ulefone Metal
19 fps ∼1% +73%
Wiko Lenny 3
4.4 fps ∼0% -60%
TP-Link Neffos C5
14 fps ∼1% +27%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
5.2 fps ∼0% -53%
LG X Cam
13 fps ∼1% +18%
Huawei P9
40 fps ∼3% +264%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Doogee Shoot 1
11 fps ∼2%
ZTE Blade A510
8.5 fps ∼2% -23%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
8.2 fps ∼2% -25%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
4.9 fps ∼1% -55%
Ulefone Metal
12 fps ∼3% +9%
Wiko Lenny 3
8 fps ∼2% -27%
TP-Link Neffos C5
8.3 fps ∼2% -25%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
9.6 fps ∼2% -13%
LG X Cam
12 fps ∼3% +9%
Huawei P9
43 fps ∼9% +291%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Doogee Shoot 1
4 fps ∼1%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
3.4 fps ∼1% -15%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
3.6 fps ∼1% -10%
Ulefone Metal
2.9 fps ∼1% -27%
Wiko Lenny 3
fps ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5
6.1 fps ∼1% +53%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
1.8 fps ∼0% -55%
LG X Cam
4.8 fps ∼1% +20%
Huawei P9
18 fps ∼3% +350%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Doogee Shoot 1
4 fps ∼1%
ZTE Blade A510
3.5 fps ∼1% -12%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1.8 fps ∼0% -55%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
1.2 fps ∼0% -70%
Ulefone Metal
6.4 fps ∼2% +60%
Wiko Lenny 3
fps ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5
2.8 fps ∼1% -30%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4.1 fps ∼1% +3%
LG X Cam
4.5 fps ∼1% +13%
Huawei P9
19 fps ∼5% +375%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
Doogee Shoot 1
2.6 fps ∼1%
ZTE Blade A510
1.1 fps ∼0% -58%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2.5 fps ∼1% -4%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2.7 fps ∼1% +4%
Ulefone Metal
8.9 fps ∼2% +242%
Wiko Lenny 3
fps ∼0% -100%
LG X Cam
3.1 fps ∼1% +19%
Huawei P9
10 fps ∼2% +285%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
Doogee Shoot 1
2.6 fps ∼1%
ZTE Blade A510
2.5 fps ∼1% -4%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1.2 fps ∼1% -54%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
1.2 fps ∼1% -54%
Ulefone Metal
4.5 fps ∼3% +73%
Wiko Lenny 3
fps ∼0% -100%
LG X Cam
2.9 fps ∼2% +12%
Huawei P9
11 fps ∼6% +323%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor)
Doogee Shoot 1
3653 Points ∼43%
ZTE Blade A510
2675 Points ∼31% -27%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2807 Points ∼33% -23%
Ulefone Metal
4079 Points ∼48% +12%
Wiko Lenny 3
2832 Points ∼33% -22%
TP-Link Neffos C5
3443 Points ∼40% -6%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4283 Points ∼50% +17%
LG X Cam
3882 Points ∼45% +6%
Huawei P9
7058 Points ∼83% +93%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordenar por valor)
Doogee Shoot 1
10 Points ∼1%
ZTE Blade A510
10 Points ∼1% 0%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
592 Points ∼35% +5820%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
9 Points ∼1% -10%
Ulefone Metal
10 Points ∼1% 0%
Wiko Lenny 3
632 Points ∼37% +6220%
TP-Link Neffos C5
638 Points ∼38% +6280%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
551 Points ∼32% +5410%
LG X Cam
10 Points ∼1% 0%
Huawei P9
1029 Points ∼61% +10190%
Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Doogee Shoot 1
383 Points ∼4%
ZTE Blade A510
174 Points ∼2% -55%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
174 Points ∼2% -55%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
175 Points ∼2% -54%
Ulefone Metal
433 Points ∼5% +13%
Wiko Lenny 3
138 Points ∼1% -64%
TP-Link Neffos C5
281 Points ∼3% -27%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
313 Points ∼3% -18%
LG X Cam
424 Points ∼5% +11%
Huawei P9
1583 Points ∼17% +313%
Memory (ordenar por valor)
Doogee Shoot 1
558 Points ∼13%
ZTE Blade A510
285 Points ∼6% -49%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
487 Points ∼11% -13%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
354 Points ∼8% -37%
Ulefone Metal
802 Points ∼18% +44%
Wiko Lenny 3
293 Points ∼7% -47%
TP-Link Neffos C5
991 Points ∼22% +78%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
741 Points ∼17% +33%
LG X Cam
600 Points ∼14% +8%
Huawei P9
2627 Points ∼59% +371%
System (ordenar por valor)
Doogee Shoot 1
1164 Points ∼11%
ZTE Blade A510
829 Points ∼8% -29%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
801 Points ∼8% -31%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
838 Points ∼8% -28%
Ulefone Metal
1691 Points ∼16% +45%
Wiko Lenny 3
988 Points ∼10% -15%
TP-Link Neffos C5
1199 Points ∼12% +3%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
1035 Points ∼10% -11%
LG X Cam
1178 Points ∼11% +1%
Huawei P9
3930 Points ∼38% +238%
Overall (ordenar por valor)
Doogee Shoot 1
221 Points ∼6%
ZTE Blade A510
141 Points ∼4% -36%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
448 Points ∼12% +103%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
148 Points ∼4% -33%
Ulefone Metal
273 Points ∼7% +24%
Wiko Lenny 3
399 Points ∼11% +81%
TP-Link Neffos C5
683 Points ∼18% +209%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
603 Points ∼16% +173%
LG X Cam
232 Points ∼6% +5%
Huawei P9
2025 Points ∼53% +816%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Doogee Shoot 1
20.784 Points ∼0%
ZTE Blade A510
12.784 Points ∼0% -38%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
12.729 Points ∼0% -39%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
12.755 Points ∼0% -39%
Ulefone Metal
17.831 Points ∼0% -14%
Wiko Lenny 3
14.068 Points ∼0% -32%
TP-Link Neffos C5
18.209 Points ∼0% -12%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
17.094 Points ∼0% -18%
LG X Cam
18.343 Points ∼0% -12%
Huawei P9
68.4 Points ∼0% +229%
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Doogee Shoot 1
3389 Points ∼7%
ZTE Blade A510
2102 Points ∼4% -38%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1910 Points ∼4% -44%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2122 Points ∼4% -37%
Ulefone Metal
2738 Points ∼6% -19%
Wiko Lenny 3
2133 Points ∼4% -37%
TP-Link Neffos C5
2738 Points ∼6% -19%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2773 Points ∼6% -18%
LG X Cam
2752 Points ∼6% -19%
Huawei P9
11783 Points ∼24% +248%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Doogee Shoot 1
11057.6 ms * ∼19%
ZTE Blade A510
17364.1 ms * ∼29% -57%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
19234.4 ms * ∼32% -74%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
19092.2 ms * ∼32% -73%
Ulefone Metal
13397.3 ms * ∼23% -21%
Wiko Lenny 3
14862.9 ms * ∼25% -34%
TP-Link Neffos C5
12783.4 ms * ∼21% -16%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
12952.9 ms * ∼22% -17%
LG X Cam
12958.3 ms * ∼22% -17%
Huawei P9
2922.6 ms * ∼5% +74%

Leyenda

 
Doogee Shoot 1 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade A510 Mediatek MT6735P, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V7 Lite Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Archos 50 Platinum 4G Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Ulefone Metal Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Wiko Lenny 3 Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
TP-Link Neffos C5 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto G4 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG X Cam Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P9 HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.
 41.2 °C38.5 °C33.7 °C 
 42 °C38.6 °C34.3 °C 
 43 °C41 °C34.8 °C 
Máximo: 43 °C
Médio: 38.6 °C
32.1 °C33.5 °C36.3 °C
32.2 °C32.9 °C38.9 °C
32.1 °C33.4 °C40.1 °C
Máximo: 40.1 °C
Médio: 34.6 °C
Conector de corriente  29.2 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.645.32525.443.33125.337.84032.937.85033.638.86331.636.68028.436.31002734.912520.828.91602226.420021.332.125020.84131521.252.640019.460.750019.566.163017.768.680017.974.4100017.878.5125017.374.3160017.471.5200016.770.8250017.268.7315018.267.5400017.961.8500017.651.7630017.748800017.852.41000017.950.61250018.134.71600018.224.3SPL3082.6N1.345.4median 17.9Doogee Shoot 1median 52.6Delta1.314.731.636.725.435.425.33932.935.233.633.731.635.428.434.9272720.823.8222421.322.820.824.621.222.219.425.419.533.417.746.617.960.617.868.217.369.317.47216.773.717.268.418.268.317.969.417.667.517.756.217.852.917.95818.156.718.2403080.31.338.2median 17.9ZTE Blade A510median 56.21.319.432.441.331.337.831.735.42634.939.440.336.232.928.632.525.424.321.323.723.322.422.525.822.426.221.336.518.444.417.55617.560.817.269.516.870.117.372.817.472.316.672.217.368.717.665.417.667.117.76717.467.817.769.217.968.618.162.718.151.329.881.21.346.6median 17.7Archos 50 Platinum 4Gmedian 65.41.614.2hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Doogee Shoot 1 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.6% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (17.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | very high mids - on average 18% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (42.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 97% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

ZTE Blade A510 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.26 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | very high mids - on average 15.8% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (16.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (44.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Archos 50 Platinum 4G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.17 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 8.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.05 / 0.25 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.73 / 1.48 / 1.58 Watt
Carga midlight 3.11 / 4.37 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Doogee Shoot 1
3300 mAh
ZTE Blade A510
2200 mAh
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2500 mAh
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2200 mAh
Ulefone Metal
3050 mAh
Wiko Lenny 3
2000 mAh
TP-Link Neffos C5
2200 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2800 mAh
LG X Cam
2500 mAh
Power Consumption
-16%
9%
-8%
-73%
-34%
-39%
0%
-1%
Idle Minimum *
0.73
0.61
16%
0.63
14%
0.59
19%
1.41
-93%
0.76
-4%
0.72
1%
0.68
7%
0.64
12%
Idle Average *
1.48
1.75
-18%
1.37
7%
1.68
-14%
2.46
-66%
2.16
-46%
1.87
-26%
1.58
-7%
1.38
7%
Idle Maximum *
1.58
1.83
-16%
1.71
-8%
1.79
-13%
2.83
-79%
2.35
-49%
2
-27%
1.61
-2%
1.43
9%
Load Average *
3.11
4.49
-44%
2.82
9%
4.22
-36%
5.15
-66%
4.65
-50%
5.99
-93%
3.36
-8%
3.99
-28%
Load Maximum *
4.37
5.14
-18%
3.36
23%
4.26
3%
7.05
-61%
5.35
-22%
6.45
-48%
3.91
11%
4.49
-3%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Navegando con WLAN v1.3
8h 21min
Doogee Shoot 1
3300 mAh
ZTE Blade A510
2200 mAh
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2500 mAh
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2200 mAh
Ulefone Metal
3050 mAh
Wiko Lenny 3
2000 mAh
TP-Link Neffos C5
2200 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2800 mAh
LG X Cam
2500 mAh
Duración de Batería
WiFi v1.3
501
416
-17%
517
3%
384
-23%
403
-20%
549
10%
453
-10%
630
26%
457
-9%

Pro

+ brillante panel IPS
+ 1080p
+ contraste y representación de color
+ buenas velocidades de acceso WLAN
+ precio
+ hardware potente (smartphone básico)

Contra

- señal GPS
- sistema de cámara dual con debilidades
- temperaturas
- altavoz de mala calidad
Doogee Shoot 1. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Doogee.
Doogee Shoot 1. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Doogee.

En nuestros tests, el Doogee Shoot 1 demostró ser un buen smartphone básico del segmento de precios más bajo. Con 16 GB de ROM y 2 GB de RAM, la cantidad de almacenamiento interno es razonable para us precio. Junto con el SoC MediaTek, el paquete hardware ofrece rendimiento de sobras para que el sistema vaya fluido. Además, el Doogee Shoot 1 ofrece un panel IPS de gran contraste y resolución - y un buen aguante de batería.

La característica especial del smartphone básico, el sistema de cámara dual de la trasera del dispositivo, por desgracia es algo decepcionante. El software no usa muy bien la información extra de profundidad - el efecto bokeh que produce es impreciso y tiende a emborronar partes del objeto de las fotos. Con todo, empero, la calidad de las fotos "normales" ciertamente puede igualar el de la competencia en este nivel de precios.

No nos gustó tanto la mala calidad del altavoz, el deficiente módulo GPS, y las temperaturas algo altas bajo carga. La carcasa también debería ser más elegante a nuestro parecer.

El Doogee Shoot 1 es una alternativa interesante en el mercado de gama baja - pero el segundo módulo de la cámara trasera no está bien implementado.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Doogee Shoot 1 - 03/13/2017 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Acabado
82%
Teclado
68 / 75 → 90%
Ratón
88%
Conectividad
38 / 60 → 63%
Peso
91%
Battería
91%
Pantalla
85%
Rendimiento de juegos
11 / 63 → 17%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
31 / 70 → 44%
Temperatura
87%
Ruido
100%
Audio
51 / 91 → 56%
Cámara
62%
Médio
68%
79%
Smartphone - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Smartphone Doogee Shoot 1
Marcus Herbrich, 2017-03-20 (Update: 2017-03-20)