Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del Smartphone UMI Plus

Allen Ngo (traducido por Fernando Alvarez Ude), 11/29/2016

Tamaño Plus, precio reducido. Los smartphones chinos baratos tienen mejor aspecto y rinden mejor cada año. El UMI Plus no es una excepción, con un tamaño mayor pero una peor cámara.

UMI Plus (Plus Serie)
Procesador
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 2 GHz , 8x 2.00GHz Cortex-A53 (Mediatek MT6755 Helio P10, 64bit
Adaptador gráfico
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Memoría
4096 MB 
, LPDDR3
pantalla
5.5 pulgadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixels 401 PPI, LTPS, Pantalla táctil capacitiva, lustroso: si
Disco duro
,  GB 
, 32GB, ranura microSD (hasta 256GB)
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, Sensores: acelerómetro, giroscopio, sensor de proximidad, sensor de luz ambiental, brújula, lector de huellas
Equipamento de red
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, LTE, GPS
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 8.8 x 155 x 75
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix 13.0MP, f / 2.0, Enfoque por fase, flash Dual LED, video @ 1080p
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Características adicionales
24 Meses Garantía
Peso
185 g

 

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
UMI Plus
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755
31.2 MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
UMI Plus
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755
34.4 MBit/s ∼100%
405.4
cd/m²
419.2
cd/m²
457.4
cd/m²
405.2
cd/m²
432.8
cd/m²
457.1
cd/m²
407.1
cd/m²
416.7
cd/m²
472.2
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Máximo: 472.2 cd/m² Médio: 430.3 cd/m² Minimum: 12.8 cd/m²
iluminación: 86 %
Brillo con batería: 432.8 cd/m²
Contraste: 1866:1 (Negro: 0.232 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.93 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 5.18 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.4
UMI Plus
LTPS, 5.5, 1920x1080
UMI Max
Sharp, IPS, 5.5, 1920x1080
Sony Xperia XZ
IPS, 5.2, 1920x1080
ZTE Axon 7
AMOLED, 5.5, 2560x1440
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
IPS, 5.5, 1920x1080
Response Times
-25%
-88%
88%
-47%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
36
40
-11%
52
-44%
4.8
87%
56
-56%
Response Time Black / White *
26
36
-38%
60
-131%
3.2
88%
36
-38%
PWM Frequency
240.4
Screen
-13%
-18%
8%
-31%
Brightness
430
498
16%
521
21%
334
-22%
633
47%
Brightness Distribution
86
86
0%
93
8%
88
2%
93
8%
Black Level *
0.232
0.23
1%
0.37
-59%
0.66
-184%
Contrast
1866
2270
22%
1470
-21%
997
-47%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.93
6.9
-40%
5.8
-18%
4.6
7%
4.9
1%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.18
9.2
-78%
7.2
-39%
2.8
46%
5.8
-12%
Gamma
2.4 100%
2.38 101%
2.18 110%
2.29 105%
2.26 106%
CCT
7461 87%
8687 75%
8619 75%
6612 98%
7840 83%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
-19% / -16%
-53% / -35%
48% / 35%
-39% / -35%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
26 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 5.2 ms subida
↘ 20.8 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 41 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (27.1 ms).
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
36 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 14 ms subida
↘ 22 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 25 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (43.7 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 59 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 4352 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
ZTE Axon 7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
51.34 MB/s ∼59% +138%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
50.07 MB/s ∼57% +132%
Sony Xperia XZ (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
29.8 MB/s ∼34% +38%
Honor 5C (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
24.21 MB/s ∼28% +12%
UMI Plus (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
21.55 MB/s ∼25%
Coolpad Modena 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
18.25 MB/s ∼21% -15%
UMI Max (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
18.07 MB/s ∼21% -16%
UMI Super Euro Edition (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
17.88 MB/s ∼21% -17%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
79.22 MB/s ∼82% +120%
ZTE Axon 7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
78.39 MB/s ∼81% +118%
Honor 5C (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
51.93 MB/s ∼54% +44%
UMI Max (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
36.64 MB/s ∼38% +2%
UMI Super Euro Edition (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
36.22 MB/s ∼38% +1%
UMI Plus (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
35.95 MB/s ∼37%
Coolpad Modena 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
35.59 MB/s ∼37% -1%
Sony Xperia XZ (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
33.5 MB/s ∼35% -7%
Random Write 4KB
ZTE Axon 7
16.22 MB/s ∼11% +41%
Honor 5C
15.7 MB/s ∼10% +36%
Google Pixel XL 2016
14.56 MB/s ∼10% +26%
UMI Super Euro Edition
11.88 MB/s ∼8% +3%
UMI Plus
11.54 MB/s ∼8%
UMI Max
10.91 MB/s ∼7% -5%
Sony Xperia XZ
10.5 MB/s ∼7% -9%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
7.4 MB/s ∼5% -36%
Coolpad Modena 2
6.79 MB/s ∼4% -41%
Leagoo Shark 1
6.4 MB/s ∼4% -45%
Acer Liquid Z630S
5.82 MB/s ∼4% -50%
Random Read 4KB
ZTE Axon 7
121.07 MB/s ∼70% +370%
Google Pixel XL 2016
87.67 MB/s ∼51% +240%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
74 MB/s ∼43% +187%
Sony Xperia XZ
71.5 MB/s ∼41% +178%
Honor 5C
61.7 MB/s ∼36% +140%
Leagoo Shark 1
29.6 MB/s ∼17% +15%
Acer Liquid Z630S
28.43 MB/s ∼16% +10%
UMI Super Euro Edition
28.17 MB/s ∼16% +9%
UMI Max
26.66 MB/s ∼15% +4%
UMI Plus
25.75 MB/s ∼15%
Coolpad Modena 2
23.03 MB/s ∼13% -11%
Sequential Write 256KB
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
188 MB/s ∼91% +46%
ZTE Axon 7
150.92 MB/s ∼73% +17%
Sony Xperia XZ
138 MB/s ∼67% +7%
UMI Plus
128.53 MB/s ∼62%
UMI Super Euro Edition
126.95 MB/s ∼62% -1%
Google Pixel XL 2016
83.38 MB/s ∼40% -35%
Honor 5C
75.5 MB/s ∼37% -41%
UMI Max
69.5 MB/s ∼34% -46%
Acer Liquid Z630S
67.7 MB/s ∼33% -47%
Coolpad Modena 2
42.56 MB/s ∼21% -67%
Leagoo Shark 1
39.6 MB/s ∼19% -69%
Sequential Read 256KB
ZTE Axon 7
406.49 MB/s ∼51% +67%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
282 MB/s ∼36% +16%
Sony Xperia XZ
281 MB/s ∼35% +15%
Leagoo Shark 1
264.1 MB/s ∼33% +8%
Honor 5C
263 MB/s ∼33% +8%
Google Pixel XL 2016
258.23 MB/s ∼33% +6%
UMI Max
257.9 MB/s ∼33% +6%
UMI Super Euro Edition
257.8 MB/s ∼33% +6%
Acer Liquid Z630S
249.01 MB/s ∼31% +2%
UMI Plus
244.1 MB/s ∼31%
Coolpad Modena 2
147.04 MB/s ∼19% -40%
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score
Google Pixel XL 2016 (Version 6.2.1)
138641 Points ∼61% +186%
Sony Xperia XZ
129317 Points ∼57% +166%
ZTE Axon 7
122524 Points ∼54% +152%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (6.2.1)
62484 Points ∼27% +29%
Honor 5C
53143 Points ∼23% +9%
UMI Super Euro Edition
50072 Points ∼22% +3%
UMI Max
49057 Points ∼22% +1%
UMI Plus
48558 Points ∼21%
Acer Liquid Z630S
35585 Points ∼16% -27%
Leagoo Shark 1
34261 Points ∼15% -29%
Coolpad Modena 2
24875 Points ∼11% -49%
Geekbench 4.0
Compute RenderScript Score
Google Pixel XL 2016
7047 Points ∼86% +390%
Sony Xperia XZ
7046 Points ∼86% +390%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2515 Points ∼31% +75%
UMI Super Euro Edition
1561 Points ∼19% +9%
UMI Plus
1437 Points ∼17%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Google Pixel XL 2016
4167 Points ∼16% +55%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
4042 Points ∼15% +50%
ZTE Axon 7
3867 Points ∼14% +43%
Sony Xperia XZ
3701 Points ∼14% +37%
UMI Super Euro Edition
2818 Points ∼11% +5%
UMI Max
2701 Points ∼10% 0%
UMI Plus
2695 Points ∼10%
Coolpad Modena 2
1274 Points ∼5% -53%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Sony Xperia XZ
1647 Points ∼30% +138%
Google Pixel XL 2016
1513 Points ∼28% +118%
ZTE Axon 7
1280 Points ∼23% +85%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
820 Points ∼15% +18%
UMI Max
734 Points ∼13% +6%
UMI Super Euro Edition
727 Points ∼13% +5%
UMI Plus
693 Points ∼13%
Coolpad Modena 2
459 Points ∼8% -34%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2119 Points ∼68% +71%
Google Pixel XL 2016
2044 Points ∼66% +65%
Sony Xperia XZ
1613 Points ∼52% +30%
Honor 5C
1440 Points ∼46% +16%
UMI Plus
1242 Points ∼40%
ZTE Axon 7
1232 Points ∼40% -1%
UMI Super Euro Edition
1131 Points ∼36% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
ZTE Axon 7
3244 Points ∼46% +809%
Sony Xperia XZ
3144 Points ∼45% +781%
Google Pixel XL 2016
2863 Points ∼41% +702%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
426 Points ∼6% +19%
UMI Super Euro Edition
357 Points ∼5% 0%
UMI Plus
357 Points ∼5%
Honor 5C
303 Points ∼4% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Google Pixel XL 2016
2629 Points ∼52% +520%
Sony Xperia XZ
2596 Points ∼51% +512%
ZTE Axon 7
2380 Points ∼47% +461%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
518 Points ∼10% +22%
UMI Plus
424 Points ∼8%
UMI Super Euro Edition
421 Points ∼8% -1%
Honor 5C
367 Points ∼7% -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2091 Points ∼68%
Google Pixel XL 2016
2009 Points ∼65%
Sony Xperia XZ
1516 Points ∼49%
UMI Super Euro Edition
1177 Points ∼38%
ZTE Axon 7
1151 Points ∼37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
ZTE Axon 7
4901 Points ∼40%
Google Pixel XL 2016
4406 Points ∼36%
Sony Xperia XZ
4333 Points ∼36%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
739 Points ∼6%
UMI Super Euro Edition
511 Points ∼4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Google Pixel XL 2016
3483 Points ∼52%
Sony Xperia XZ
3152 Points ∼47%
ZTE Axon 7
2843 Points ∼43%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
863 Points ∼13%
UMI Super Euro Edition
587 Points ∼9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2109 Points ∼70% +66%
Google Pixel XL 2016
1935 Points ∼64% +52%
ZTE Axon 7
1783 Points ∼59% +40%
Sony Xperia XZ
1667 Points ∼55% +31%
Honor 5C
1418 Points ∼47% +11%
UMI Plus
1272 Points ∼42%
UMI Max
1247 Points ∼41% -2%
Acer Liquid Z630S
1126 Points ∼37% -11%
UMI Super Euro Edition
1117 Points ∼37% -12%
Leagoo Shark 1
828 Points ∼28% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Sony Xperia XZ
2853 Points ∼53% +711%
Google Pixel XL 2016
2820 Points ∼52% +701%
ZTE Axon 7
2528 Points ∼47% +618%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
380 Points ∼7% +8%
UMI Max
354 Points ∼7% +1%
UMI Plus
352 Points ∼7%
UMI Super Euro Edition
350 Points ∼7% -1%
Honor 5C
317 Points ∼6% -10%
Acer Liquid Z630S
148 Points ∼3% -58%
Leagoo Shark 1
140 Points ∼3% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Google Pixel XL 2016
2560 Points ∼66% +511%
Sony Xperia XZ
2548 Points ∼66% +508%
ZTE Axon 7
2500 Points ∼64% +497%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
465 Points ∼12% +11%
UMI Max
421 Points ∼11% 0%
UMI Plus
419 Points ∼11%
UMI Super Euro Edition
413 Points ∼11% -1%
Honor 5C
383 Points ∼10% -9%
Acer Liquid Z630S
183 Points ∼5% -56%
Leagoo Shark 1
172 Points ∼4% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2112 Points ∼72%
Google Pixel XL 2016
1902 Points ∼65%
Sony Xperia XZ
1667 Points ∼57%
Honor 5C
1418 Points ∼49%
UMI Max
1239 Points ∼42%
UMI Super Euro Edition
1144 Points ∼39%
Acer Liquid Z630S
1113 Points ∼38%
ZTE Axon 7
1099 Points ∼38%
Leagoo Shark 1
890 Points ∼30%
Coolpad Modena 2
621 Points ∼21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
ZTE Axon 7
4619 Points ∼60%
Sony Xperia XZ
4522 Points ∼58%
Google Pixel XL 2016
3935 Points ∼51%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
719 Points ∼9%
UMI Super Euro Edition
523 Points ∼7%
UMI Max
521 Points ∼7%
Honor 5C
480 Points ∼6%
Leagoo Shark 1
232 Points ∼3%
Acer Liquid Z630S
229 Points ∼3%
Coolpad Modena 2
106 Points ∼1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Sony Xperia XZ
3275 Points ∼66%
Google Pixel XL 2016
3180 Points ∼64%
ZTE Axon 7
2698 Points ∼54%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
842 Points ∼17%
UMI Max
598 Points ∼12%
UMI Super Euro Edition
595 Points ∼12%
Honor 5C
563 Points ∼11%
Acer Liquid Z630S
278 Points ∼6%
Leagoo Shark 1
278 Points ∼6%
Coolpad Modena 2
130 Points ∼3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Sony Xperia XZ
20772 Points ∼30% +72%
ZTE Axon 7
20408 Points ∼30% +69%
Google Pixel XL 2016
18222 Points ∼26% +51%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
15984 Points ∼23% +32%
Honor 5C
13588 Points ∼20% +13%
UMI Max
12239 Points ∼18% +1%
UMI Plus
12078 Points ∼17%
UMI Super Euro Edition
11654 Points ∼17% -4%
Acer Liquid Z630S
10508 Points ∼15% -13%
Leagoo Shark 1
10325 Points ∼15% -15%
Coolpad Modena 2
7061 Points ∼10% -42%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Google Pixel XL 2016
32652 Points ∼7% +210%
Sony Xperia XZ
32056 Points ∼7% +204%
ZTE Axon 7
24310 Points ∼5% +131%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13466 Points ∼3% +28%
Honor 5C
11319 Points ∼2% +7%
UMI Max
10612 Points ∼2% +1%
UMI Super Euro Edition
10567 Points ∼2% 0%
UMI Plus
10532 Points ∼2%
Acer Liquid Z630S
6250 Points ∼1% -41%
Leagoo Shark 1
4920 Points ∼1% -53%
Coolpad Modena 2
2789 Points ∼1% -74%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Sony Xperia XZ
28603 Points ∼15% +164%
Google Pixel XL 2016
27766 Points ∼14% +156%
ZTE Axon 7
23319 Points ∼12% +115%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13955 Points ∼7% +29%
Honor 5C
11755 Points ∼6% +8%
UMI Max
10942 Points ∼6% +1%
UMI Plus
10840 Points ∼6%
UMI Super Euro Edition
10791 Points ∼5% 0%
Acer Liquid Z630S
6868 Points ∼3% -37%
Leagoo Shark 1
5568 Points ∼3% -49%
Coolpad Modena 2
3222 Points ∼2% -70%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 battery life
Sony Xperia XZ
482 min ∼71%
Work 2.0 performance score
Sony Xperia XZ
5616 Points ∼82%
Work performance score
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6785 Points ∼82% +121%
Honor 5C
5120 Points ∼62% +67%
Sony Xperia XZ
5058 Points ∼61% +65%
ZTE Axon 7
4970 Points ∼60% +62%
Google Pixel XL 2016
4739 Points ∼57% +54%
UMI Super Euro Edition
4596 Points ∼55% +50%
UMI Max
4485 Points ∼54% +46%
Acer Liquid Z630S
3814 Points ∼46% +24%
Leagoo Shark 1
3398 Points ∼41% +11%
Coolpad Modena 2
3119 Points ∼38% +2%
UMI Plus
3069 Points ∼37%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Sony Xperia XZ
1066 Points ∼69% +10560%
Google Pixel XL 2016
977 Points ∼63% +9670%
ZTE Axon 7
963 Points ∼62% +9530%
UMI Super Euro Edition
771 Points ∼50% +7610%
Honor 5C
707 Points ∼46% +6970%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
702 Points ∼46% +6920%
Acer Liquid Z630S
627 Points ∼41% +6170%
Leagoo Shark 1
611 Points ∼40% +6010%
Coolpad Modena 2
565 Points ∼37% +5550%
UMI Max
10 Points ∼1% 0%
UMI Plus
10 Points ∼1%
Graphics
Google Pixel XL 2016
5017 Points ∼58% +653%
Sony Xperia XZ
4716 Points ∼55% +608%
ZTE Axon 7
4631 Points ∼54% +595%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1019 Points ∼12% +53%
Honor 5C
814 Points ∼9% +22%
UMI Super Euro Edition
666 Points ∼8% 0%
UMI Max
666 Points ∼8% 0%
UMI Plus
666 Points ∼8%
Leagoo Shark 1
418 Points ∼5% -37%
Acer Liquid Z630S
416 Points ∼5% -38%
Coolpad Modena 2
178 Points ∼2% -73%
Memory
Google Pixel XL 2016
1677 Points ∼39% +69%
Honor 5C
1504 Points ∼35% +52%
ZTE Axon 7
1489 Points ∼35% +50%
Sony Xperia XZ
1434 Points ∼34% +45%
UMI Super Euro Edition
1052 Points ∼25% +6%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1042 Points ∼24% +5%
UMI Max
998 Points ∼23% +1%
UMI Plus
992 Points ∼23%
Coolpad Modena 2
598 Points ∼14% -40%
Acer Liquid Z630S
540 Points ∼13% -46%
Leagoo Shark 1
515 Points ∼12% -48%
System
Google Pixel XL 2016
3889 Points ∼59% +83%
ZTE Axon 7
3307 Points ∼50% +56%
Sony Xperia XZ
3047 Points ∼46% +44%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2923 Points ∼44% +38%
Honor 5C
2600 Points ∼40% +23%
UMI Super Euro Edition
2187 Points ∼33% +3%
UMI Max
2123 Points ∼32% 0%
UMI Plus
2120 Points ∼32%
Acer Liquid Z630S
1614 Points ∼25% -24%
Leagoo Shark 1
1195 Points ∼18% -44%
Coolpad Modena 2
909 Points ∼14% -57%
Overall
Google Pixel XL 2016
2378 Points ∼64% +597%
ZTE Axon 7
2165 Points ∼59% +535%
Sony Xperia XZ
2165 Points ∼59% +535%
Honor 5C
1225 Points ∼33% +259%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1215 Points ∼33% +256%
UMI Super Euro Edition
1043 Points ∼28% +206%
Acer Liquid Z630S
691 Points ∼19% +103%
Leagoo Shark 1
597 Points ∼16% +75%
Coolpad Modena 2
483 Points ∼13% +42%
UMI Max
341 Points ∼9% 0%
UMI Plus
341 Points ∼9%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Google Pixel XL 2016 (Chrome 53)
55.4 Points ∼0% +113%
Sony Xperia XZ (Chrome 52)
54.201 Points ∼0% +108%
ZTE Axon 7 (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
44.754 Points ∼0% +72%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
31.118 Points ∼0% +19%
Honor 5C (Chrome 51)
27.934 Points ∼0% +7%
UMI Super Euro Edition (Chrome 53)
26.211 Points ∼0% +1%
UMI Plus (Chrome 54.0.2840.68)
26.054 Points ∼0%
UMI Max (Chrome Version 54)
25.502 Points ∼0% -2%
Acer Liquid Z630S (Chrome Version 49)
19.028 Points ∼0% -27%
Leagoo Shark 1 (Chrome Version 50)
17.242 Points ∼0% -34%
Coolpad Modena 2 (Chrome Version 54)
13.15 Points ∼0% -50%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Coolpad Modena 2 (Chrome Version 54)
19647.2 ms * ∼33% -90%
Leagoo Shark 1 (Chrome Version 50)
14787.9 ms * ∼25% -43%
Acer Liquid Z630S (Chrome Version 49)
12876 ms * ∼22% -24%
UMI Plus (Chrome 54.0.2840.68)
10342.7 ms * ∼17%
UMI Max (Chrome Version 54)
9795.6 ms * ∼16% +5%
UMI Super Euro Edition (Chrome 53)
9410.2 ms * ∼16% +9%
Honor 5C (Chrome 51)
9111.2 ms * ∼15% +12%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
8041.4 ms * ∼14% +22%
ZTE Axon 7 (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
3096.5 ms * ∼5% +70%
Sony Xperia XZ (Chrome 52)
2768 ms * ∼5% +73%
Google Pixel XL 2016 (Chrome 53)
2653.6 ms * ∼4% +74%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Sony Xperia XZ (Chrome 52)
9069 Points ∼18% +133%
Google Pixel XL 2016 (Chrome 53)
8690 Points ∼18% +124%
ZTE Axon 7 (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
8062 Points ∼16% +107%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
4905 Points ∼10% +26%
UMI Max (Chrome Version 54)
4231 Points ∼9% +9%
Honor 5C (Chrome 51)
4188 Points ∼8% +8%
UMI Super Euro Edition (Chrome 53)
4117 Points ∼8% +6%
UMI Plus (Chrome 54.0.2840.68)
3887 Points ∼8%
Leagoo Shark 1 (Chrome Version 50)
2992 Points ∼6% -23%
Acer Liquid Z630S (Chrome Version 49)
2855 Points ∼6% -27%
Coolpad Modena 2 (Chrome Version 54)
1975 Points ∼4% -49%

Leyenda

 
UMI Plus Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2,
 
UMI Max Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Axon 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Coolpad Modena 2 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Acer Liquid Z630S Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Leagoo Shark 1 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
UMI Super Euro Edition Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 5C HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Google Pixel XL 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.
 44.8 °C36.6 °C34.8 °C 
 46.4 °C36.6 °C34.6 °C 
 42.8 °C36.8 °C34.6 °C 
Máximo: 46.4 °C
Médio: 38.7 °C
33.2 °C34.4 °C36.8 °C
33.6 °C34.8 °C35.4 °C
33.2 °C34.2 °C35.4 °C
Máximo: 36.8 °C
Médio: 34.6 °C
Temperatura del cuarto 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.634.32534.834.83133.731.24033.931.95033.3326331.333.28032.234.410029.729.712530.629.716027.431.520026.829.92502629.631524.833.240023.940.550023.446.763022.752.880022.459.4100022.664.212502267.9160021.766.5200021.567.1250021.272.9315021.173.9400020.977.3500020.978.863002172.680002162.61000021.2581250021521600021.243.3SPL3484.4N2.249.2median 22UMI Plusmedian 58Delta1.813.935.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
UMI Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.35 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (41.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 97% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.36 / 0.64 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 2.6 / 3.2 / 3.3 Watt
Carga midlight 7.7 / 4.8 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
UMI Plus
Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, , LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
UMI Max
Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Sony Xperia XZ
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
ZTE Axon 7
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash, AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
625, Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Power Consumption
53%
-19%
25%
36%
Idle Minimum *
2.6
1.02
61%
1.76
32%
0.64
75%
0.83
68%
Idle Average *
3.2
1.53
52%
3.6
-13%
0.84
74%
2.11
34%
Idle Maximum *
3.3
1.62
51%
4.06
-23%
0.87
74%
2.12
36%
Load Average *
7.7
2.91
62%
7
9%
6.02
22%
3.41
56%
Load Maximum *
4.8
2.93
39%
9.52
-98%
10.45
-118%
5.46
-14%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
21h 59min
Navegando con WLAN v1.3
9h 21min
Carga (máximo brillo)
4h 52min
UMI Plus
Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2,  Wh
UMI Max
Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2,  Wh
Sony Xperia XZ
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 11 Wh
ZTE Axon 7
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530,  Wh
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
625, Adreno 506,  Wh
Duración de Batería
5%
-24%
-4%
26%
Reader / Idle
1319
1125
-15%
1735
32%
1502
14%
Load
292
187
-36%
245
-16%
352
21%
WiFi v1.3
561
588
5%
438
-22%
411
-27%
797
42%

Pro

+ Soporte para doble SIM 4G LTE con lector de MicroSD
+ Chasis de aluminio con Gorlla Glass
+ Rendimiento decente
+ Colores precisos
+ Altavoz con buen volumen
+ USB-C
+ Barato

Contra

- El botón de inicio es mediocre y no se ilumina
- El GPS podría ser más preciso
- Un poco grueso para su tamaño de pantalla
- Brillo de pantalla medio
- Camara de calidad media
- Altavoces mediocres
- No dispone de WiFi 802.11ac
- No dispone de velocidad de transmisión USB 3.0
- Carece de NFC
Análisis: UMI Plus. Modelo de prueba cedido por Coolicool.com
Análisis: UMI Plus. Modelo de prueba cedido por Coolicool.com

UMI ha creado un buen smartphone con especificaciones muy potentes por menos de 200$. Rinde tan bien como uno esperaría de un smartphone de gama media sin escatimar características populares como el lector de huellas, lector de tarjetas MicroSD o incluso un puerto USB Type-C. Encapsula todo dentro de un diseño robusto. y tendrás un teléfono difícil de mejorar por este precio.

Al igual que la mayoría de dispositivos baratos, sin embargo, el diablo se esconde en los detalles. Sus dimensiones son poco contenitas para un smartphone de 5.5 pulgadas y la calidad de la cámara posterior es el correspondiente a un dispositivo barato. La calidad del altavoz es escasa y sus botones podrían tener un mejor retorno al ser pulsados. La calidad de la recepción de llamadas no fue demasiado buen en nuestra zona y puede carecer de cobertura 4G en determinadas zonas. La vibración es escasa y el GPS es de precisión media.

Si la lista de inconvenientes no es un problema para su uso diario, los potenciales compradores deberían estar satisfechos con su rendimiento y la calidad global del UMI Plus.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

UMI Plus - 11/27/2016 v5.1
Allen Ngo

Acabado
82%
Teclado
66 / 75 → 88%
Ratón
91%
Conectividad
44 / 60 → 74%
Peso
88%
Battería
92%
Pantalla
82%
Rendimiento de juegos
28 / 63 → 44%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
38 / 70 → 55%
Temperatura
89%
Ruido
100%
Audio
54 / 91 → 59%
Cámara
58%
Médio
70%
81%
Smartphone - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Smartphone UMI Plus
Allen Ngo, 2016-11-29 (Update: 2016-11-29)