Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del Smartphone Sony Xperia XZ

Florian Wimmer (traducido por Francisco García), 11/12/PM

El visionario. Sony quiere una revolución: el Xperia XZ quiere cambiar nuestra vida diaria. Sin embargo, con la salvedad de su cámara de 23 MP, la mayoría de sus especificaciones son bastante ordinarias. Descubramos de qué es capaz este modelo insignia de Sony.

Sony Xperia XZ (Xperia Serie)
Procesador
Adaptador gráfico
Memoría
3072 MB 
pantalla
5.2 pulgadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixels 424 PPI, capacitiva, IPS, TRILUMINOS display for mobile, Dynamic Contrast Enhancement, X-Reality, lustroso: si
Disco duro
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 32GB (Mono Sim) / 64GB (Dual Sim), 22.4 GB libre
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, Audio Conexiones: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: microSD hasta 256 GB , 1 Lector de Huellas Digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: lector de huellas, acelerómetro, posición, proximiad, barómetro, brújula, espectro de color
Equipamento de red
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1,800/​1,900), UMTS (800/​850/​900/​1,700/​1,900/​2,100), LTE (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B29/​B32/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41), LTE, GPS
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 8.1 x 146 x 72
Battería
11 Wh, 2900 mAh Litio-Ion, Qnovo Adaptive Charging, Tiempo de Conversación 2G (según el fabricante): 40 h, Tiempo de Conversación 3G (según el fabricante): 17 h, Standby 2G (según el fabricante): 610 h, Standby 3G (según el fabricante): 600 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 23 MPix Triple-Sensor-Technology, hasta ISO 12800, lente gran angular de 24mm, 1/2.3” Exmor RS para móviles
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix 1/3.06” Exmor RS para móviles, lente gran angular F2.0 de 22mm
Características adicionales
Altavoces: altavoces Estéreo, Teclado: virtual , cable de carga, cargador USB, Headset, breve manual, What's New, News, Weather, Movie Creator, Sketches, Lounge, Playstatation, AVG Protection, Support, Slide View, 24 Meses Garantía, Miracast, DLNA, USB-OTG, MHL; ancho de banda (bajada/subida): 450Mbps/​50Mbps (LTE); SAR-value: 0.85 W/kg (head), 1.20 W/kg (body), fanless
Peso
161 g, Suministro de Electricidad: 42 g
Precio
700 Euros

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (5.0 GHz)
451 MBit/s ∼100% +8%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
419 MBit/s ∼93%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
286 MBit/s ∼63% -32%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (5.0 GHz)
339 MBit/s ∼100% +151%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
256 MBit/s ∼76% +90%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
135 MBit/s ∼40%
GPS Garmin Edge 500: overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500: bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500: forest
GPS Garmin Edge 500: forest
GPS Sony Xperia XZ: overview
GPS Sony Xperia XZ: overview
GPS Sony Xperia XZ: bridge
GPS Sony Xperia XZ: bridge
GPS Sony Xperia XZ: forest
GPS Sony Xperia XZ: forest

Comparación de Imágenes

Elige una escena y navega dentro de la primera imagen. Un click cambia el nivel de zoom. Un click en la imagen aumentada abre la original en una ventana nueva. La primera imagen muestra la fotografía escalada del dispositivo de pruebas.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
510
cd/m²
529
cd/m²
517
cd/m²
513
cd/m²
544
cd/m²
512
cd/m²
516
cd/m²
541
cd/m²
507
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 544 cd/m² Médio: 521 cd/m² Minimum: 5.51 cd/m²
iluminación: 93 %
Brillo con batería: 544 cd/m²
Contraste: 1470:1 (Negro: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.8 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 7.2 | - Ø
100% sRGB (Calman)
Gamma: 2.18
Sony Xperia XZ
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
OnePlus 3
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Apple iPhone 7
IPS, 1334x750, 4.7
Samsung Galaxy S7
SAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.1
HTC 10
Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.2
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
IPS, 3840x2160, 5.5
Screen
14%
28%
29%
12%
-25%
Brightness
521
431
-17%
519
0%
351
-33%
434
-17%
541
4%
Brightness Distribution
93
84
-10%
90
-3%
98
5%
93
0%
85
-9%
Black Level *
0.37
0.34
8%
0.36
3%
0.45
-22%
Contrast
1470
1635
11%
1236
-16%
1244
-15%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.8
4.1
29%
1.3
78%
2.04
65%
2.8
52%
9.19
-58%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.2
3.3
54%
1.9
74%
1.63
77%
3.7
49%
10.58
-47%
Gamma
2.18 110%
2.1 114%
2.26 106%
2.07 116%
2.31 104%
2.7 89%
CCT
8619 75%
6550 99%
6818 95%
6391 102%
7164 91%
9760 67%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
89.38
63.15
86.86
73.19
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
99.71
99.35

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
60 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 21 ms subida
↘ 39 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 99 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (27.2 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
52 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 22 ms subida
↘ 30 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 83 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (44.2 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 60 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 1345 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 30860) Hz.

AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Sony Xperia XZ
129317 Points ∼70%
OnePlus 3 (Version 6.1.4)
142090 Points ∼77% +10%
Apple iPhone 7
142532 Points ∼77% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S7
127902 Points ∼69% -1%
HTC 10
131866 Points ∼72% +2%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
78324 Points ∼42% -39%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordenar por valor)
Sony Xperia XZ
1667 Points ∼64%
OnePlus 3
1789 Points ∼69% +7%
Apple iPhone 7
1525 Points ∼59% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2010 Points ∼78% +21%
HTC 10
1512 Points ∼58% -9%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1348 Points ∼52% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Sony Xperia XZ
4522 Points ∼58%
OnePlus 3
4633 Points ∼60% +2%
Apple iPhone 7
4057 Points ∼52% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S7
3018 Points ∼39% -33%
HTC 10
4581 Points ∼59% +1%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
2336 Points ∼30% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordenar por valor)
Sony Xperia XZ
3275 Points ∼67%
OnePlus 3
3424 Points ∼70% +5%
Apple iPhone 7
2964 Points ∼61% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2715 Points ∼56% -17%
HTC 10
3157 Points ∼65% -4%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
2009 Points ∼41% -39%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordenar por valor)
Sony Xperia XZ
20772 Points ∼30%
OnePlus 3
21771 Points ∼32% +5%
Apple iPhone 7
15450 Points ∼22% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S7
19944 Points ∼29% -4%
HTC 10
20344 Points ∼29% -2%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
12852 Points ∼19% -38%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordenar por valor)
Sony Xperia XZ
32056 Points ∼7%
OnePlus 3
34023 Points ∼7% +6%
Apple iPhone 7
63974 Points ∼14% +100%
Samsung Galaxy S7
33348 Points ∼7% +4%
HTC 10
30061 Points ∼7% -6%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
37725 Points ∼8% +18%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordenar por valor)
Sony Xperia XZ
28603 Points ∼15%
OnePlus 3
30241 Points ∼15% +6%
Apple iPhone 7
37676 Points ∼19% +32%
Samsung Galaxy S7
29015 Points ∼15% +1%
HTC 10
27176 Points ∼14% -5%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
26380 Points ∼13% -8%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Sony Xperia XZ
88 fps ∼7%
OnePlus 3
89 fps ∼7% +1%
Apple iPhone 7
110.3 fps ∼8% +25%
Samsung Galaxy S7
84 fps ∼6% -5%
HTC 10
73 fps ∼6% -17%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
56 fps ∼4% -36%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Sony Xperia XZ
88 fps ∼19%
OnePlus 3
60 fps ∼13% -32%
Apple iPhone 7
57.7 fps ∼13% -34%
Samsung Galaxy S7
53 fps ∼12% -40%
HTC 10
43 fps ∼9% -51%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
52 fps ∼11% -41%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Sony Xperia XZ
40 fps ∼7%
OnePlus 3
47 fps ∼9% +18%
Apple iPhone 7
60.7 fps ∼11% +52%
Samsung Galaxy S7
40 fps ∼7% 0%
HTC 10
39 fps ∼7% -2%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
25 fps ∼5% -37%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Sony Xperia XZ
39 fps ∼17%
OnePlus 3
46 fps ∼20% +18%
Apple iPhone 7
58.5 fps ∼26% +50%
Samsung Galaxy S7
27 fps ∼12% -31%
HTC 10
24 fps ∼11% -38%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
27 fps ∼12% -31%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
Sony Xperia XZ
31 fps ∼7%
OnePlus 3
31 fps ∼7% 0%
Apple iPhone 7
42.2 fps ∼10% +36%
Samsung Galaxy S7
28 fps ∼7% -10%
HTC 10
24 fps ∼6% -23%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
18 fps ∼4% -42%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
Sony Xperia XZ
31 fps ∼18%
OnePlus 3
30 fps ∼17% -3%
Apple iPhone 7
59.4 fps ∼34% +92%
Samsung Galaxy S7
15 fps ∼9% -52%
HTC 10
14 fps ∼8% -55%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
19 fps ∼11% -39%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor)
Sony Xperia XZ
5058 Points ∼62%
OnePlus 3 (OxygenOS 3.1.2)
7101 Points ∼87% +40%
Samsung Galaxy S7
4826 Points ∼59% -5%
HTC 10
5809 Points ∼71% +15%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
5094 Points ∼63% +1%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordenar por valor)
Sony Xperia XZ
1066 Points ∼69%
OnePlus 3
1112 Points ∼72% +4%
Apple iPhone 7
1531 Points ∼99% +44%
Samsung Galaxy S7
957 Points ∼62% -10%
HTC 10
928 Points ∼60% -13%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
986 Points ∼64% -8%
Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Sony Xperia XZ
4716 Points ∼55%
OnePlus 3
4813 Points ∼56% +2%
Apple iPhone 7
6896 Points ∼80% +46%
Samsung Galaxy S7
1723 Points ∼20% -63%
HTC 10
5009 Points ∼58% +6%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
3137 Points ∼36% -33%
Memory (ordenar por valor)
Sony Xperia XZ
1434 Points ∼37%
OnePlus 3
2052 Points ∼53% +43%
Apple iPhone 7
1257 Points ∼33% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2244 Points ∼58% +56%
HTC 10
1772 Points ∼46% +24%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
876 Points ∼23% -39%
System (ordenar por valor)
Sony Xperia XZ
3047 Points ∼46%
OnePlus 3
3537 Points ∼54% +16%
Apple iPhone 7
6097 Points ∼93% +100%
Samsung Galaxy S7
4217 Points ∼64% +38%
HTC 10
2806 Points ∼43% -8%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
2737 Points ∼42% -10%
Overall (ordenar por valor)
Sony Xperia XZ
2165 Points ∼66%
OnePlus 3
2496 Points ∼76% +15%
Apple iPhone 7
2999 Points ∼91% +39%
Samsung Galaxy S7
1987 Points ∼60% -8%
HTC 10
2193 Points ∼66% +1%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1649 Points ∼50% -24%
Geekbench 4.0
Compute RenderScript Score (ordenar por valor)
Sony Xperia XZ
7046 Points ∼86%
OnePlus 3
7085 Points ∼86% +1%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Sony Xperia XZ
3701 Points ∼14%
OnePlus 3
4097 Points ∼15% +11%
Apple iPhone 7
5585 Points ∼21% +51%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Sony Xperia XZ
1647 Points ∼30%
OnePlus 3
1754 Points ∼32% +6%
Apple iPhone 7
3490 Points ∼64% +112%

Leyenda

 
Sony Xperia XZ Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Apple iPhone 7 Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
HTC 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
Sony Xperia XZ (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
29.8 MB/s ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy S7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
53.6 MB/s ∼62% +80%
HTC 10 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
65.44 MB/s ∼75% +120%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
Sony Xperia XZ (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
33.5 MB/s ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy S7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
72.33 MB/s ∼75% +116%
HTC 10 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
83.3 MB/s ∼86% +149%
Random Write 4KB (ordenar por valor)
Sony Xperia XZ
10.5 MB/s ∼7%
OnePlus 3
18.23 MB/s ∼12% +74%
Samsung Galaxy S7
16.01 MB/s ∼11% +52%
HTC 10
15.89 MB/s ∼10% +51%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
14.53 MB/s ∼10% +38%
Random Read 4KB (ordenar por valor)
Sony Xperia XZ
71.5 MB/s ∼42%
OnePlus 3
137.62 MB/s ∼82% +92%
Samsung Galaxy S7
85.9 MB/s ∼51% +20%
HTC 10
29.92 MB/s ∼18% -58%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
19.11 MB/s ∼11% -73%
Sequential Write 256KB (ordenar por valor)
Sony Xperia XZ
138 MB/s ∼71%
OnePlus 3
153.3 MB/s ∼79% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S7
145.72 MB/s ∼75% +6%
HTC 10
115.56 MB/s ∼59% -16%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
99.4 MB/s ∼51% -28%
Sequential Read 256KB (ordenar por valor)
Sony Xperia XZ
281 MB/s ∼36%
OnePlus 3
408.71 MB/s ∼52% +45%
Samsung Galaxy S7
483.82 MB/s ∼61% +72%
HTC 10
275.09 MB/s ∼35% -2%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
256.75 MB/s ∼33% -9%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Sony Xperia XZ (Chrome 52)
2768 ms * ∼5%
OnePlus 3 (Chrome 51)
2920.7 ms * ∼5% -6%
Apple iPhone 7 (Safari Mobile 10.0)
1113.4 ms * ∼2% +60%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2561.5 ms * ∼4% +7%
HTC 10 (Chrome 49)
3146.3 ms * ∼5% -14%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium (Chrome 47)
4377.1 ms * ∼7% -58%
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Sony Xperia XZ (Chrome 52)
9069 Points ∼18%
OnePlus 3 (Chrome 51)
9155 Points ∼18% +1%
Apple iPhone 7 (Safari Mobile 10.0)
24875 Points ∼50% +174%
Samsung Galaxy S7
13161 Points ∼27% +45%
HTC 10 (Chrome 49)
8905 Points ∼18% -2%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium (Chrome 47)
8851 Points ∼18% -2%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (ordenar por valor)
Sony Xperia XZ (Chrome 52)
90 Points ∼16%
OnePlus 3 (Chrome 51)
122 Points ∼21% +36%
Apple iPhone 7 (Safari Mobile 10.0)
202 Points ∼35% +124%
Samsung Galaxy S7
166 Points ∼29% +84%
HTC 10 (Chrome 49)
108 Points ∼19% +20%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium (Chrome 47)
106 Points ∼18% +18%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Sony Xperia XZ (Chrome 52)
54.201 Points ∼0%
OnePlus 3 (chrome 51)
54.4 Points ∼0% 0%
Apple iPhone 7 (Safari Mobile 10.0)
165.86 Points ∼1% +206%
Samsung Galaxy S7
74 Points ∼0% +37%
HTC 10 (Chrome 49)
52.1 Points ∼0% -4%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium (Chrome 47)
48.2 Points ∼0% -11%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguracionesValor
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguracionesValor
 high30 fps
Carga Máx.
 37.6 °C36.3 °C35.4 °C 
 38.5 °C37.5 °C38.2 °C 
 37.1 °C37.6 °C37.6 °C 
Máximo: 38.5 °C
Médio: 37.3 °C
36.9 °C38.5 °C39.4 °C
37 °C39 °C39.7 °C
37.7 °C37.7 °C39.4 °C
Máximo: 39.7 °C
Médio: 38.4 °C
Conector de corriente  38.4 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 22.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2027.626.130.12526.226.725.93126.526.5244028.732.329.35029.728.827.46324.72825.88026.123.927.310029.8263012538.934.737.816024.520.221.720033.125.52425040.822.629.531548.62136.940053.521.441.65005620.444.16306117.548.180064.91851.6100066.818.153.1125064.416.950.7160064.815.250.4200068.615.751.7250068.71551.9315067.314.551400065.71449.150006113.645.7630057.313.542.7800051.613.438.2100005913.635.41250056.213.731.71600051.213.528.3SPL7728.961.5N36.41.214.3median 57.3Sony Xperia XZmedian 16.9median 42.7Delta10.83.59.429.635.529.628.529.528.526.328.226.329.631.529.627.927.427.925.125.725.124.729.424.733.831.333.843.732.143.742.620.442.64620.84647.920.247.950.419.750.451.922.351.960.820.160.866.318.966.367.517.767.567.116.767.166.91766.97014.87072.915.972.965.914.665.971.514.471.574.714.174.774.813.874.873.413.773.472.613.872.662.313.762.355.213.755.255.113.655.183.128.683.154.11.254.1median 65.9Apple iPhone 7median 16.7median 65.910.53.410.535.432.335.235.428.226.137.828.228.63028.428.630.629.833.830.637.53739.537.529.329.434.329.328.426.927.328.432.229.130.832.238.426.526.238.441.22323.841.246.227.322.946.252.23322.452.2573819.95759.641.220.459.666.748.418.766.768.25117.768.270.25317.970.272.957.21872.973.857.117.873.873.255.11773.276.758.216.976.777.558.217.477.579.359.217.879.377.757.117.577.775.254.217.375.27858.817.3787253.4187264.646.318.364.663.245.517.963.253.33617.953.387.568.330.187.569.722.11.469.7median 68.2Samsung Galaxy S7median 51median 17.9median 68.210.711.12.410.740.136.832.440.1382731.33834.330.631.734.334.529.72634.544.138.139.444.140.529.736.240.53331.428.63326.827.625.426.826.924.421.326.93724.823.33745.529.522.545.551.636.222.451.657.341.721.357.359.746.618.459.766.452.517.566.468.45217.568.469.952.517.269.971.853.816.871.872.554.817.372.575.256.917.475.278.459.716.678.477.659.717.377.678.260.817.678.281.363.817.681.378.561.817.778.575.958.817.475.976.259.417.776.274.357.517.974.370.354.818.170.354.437.618.154.488.671.129.888.67325.81.373median 70.3OnePlus 3median 53.8median 17.7median 70.311.910.41.611.939.632.44132.431.335.531.531.731.234.22630.446.839.441.833.936.234.629.328.630.233.825.430.629.421.334.434.523.340.541.922.544.845.622.450.153.321.355.85518.458.155.817.56056.817.56152.517.256.660.216.861.769.717.362.774.417.466.87416.672.175.317.371.973.717.665.469.717.663.266.317.756.170.617.459.27017.761.167.317.961.259.118.159.463.318.155.583.129.878.149.11.337.6median 60.2HTC 10median 17.7median 59.410.71.64.733.836.432.433.831.829.931.331.832.732.731.732.732.333.12632.345.446.139.445.429.630.736.229.629.525.228.629.525.923.125.425.925.623.421.325.637.124.723.337.150.127.122.550.156.234.622.456.261.840.421.361.864.74318.464.769.648.717.569.668.847.117.568.867.647.417.267.672.850.316.872.87552.217.37575.953.717.475.97652.116.67674.849.817.374.874.849.417.674.874.548.917.674.576.251.317.776.275.750.817.475.775.451.917.775.472.55117.972.571.150.518.171.164.247.518.164.286.462.729.886.46816.41.368median 71.1LG G5median 48.9median 17.7median 71.19.86.81.69.8hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Sony Xperia XZ audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.01 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.3% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (21.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Apple iPhone 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.06 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Samsung Galaxy S7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.45 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

OnePlus 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.61 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

HTC 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.13 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

LG G5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.41 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.09 / 0.18 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.76 / 3.6 / 4.06 Watt
Carga midlight 7 / 9.52 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Sony Xperia XZ
2900 mAh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh
Apple iPhone 7
1960 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7
3000 mAh
HTC 10
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
3430 mAh
Power Consumption
41%
56%
52%
33%
25%
Idle Minimum *
1.76
0.57
68%
0.54
69%
0.68
61%
0.68
61%
0.83
53%
Idle Average *
3.6
1.24
66%
1.51
58%
1.02
72%
1.49
59%
2.36
34%
Idle Maximum *
4.06
1.36
67%
1.54
62%
1.14
72%
1.91
53%
2.42
40%
Load Average *
7
5.92
15%
3.75
46%
4.73
32%
7.4
-6%
7.27
-4%
Load Maximum *
9.52
10.53
-11%
5.01
47%
7.16
25%
9.71
-2%
9.18
4%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
18h 45min
Navegando con WLAN v1.3
7h 18min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 22min
Carga (máximo brillo)
3h 07min
Sony Xperia XZ
2900 mAh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh
Apple iPhone 7
1960 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7
3000 mAh
HTC 10
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
3430 mAh
Duración de Batería
56%
22%
43%
11%
-2%
Reader / Idle
1125
1338
19%
1770
57%
1810
61%
1273
13%
1277
14%
Load
187
268
43%
126
-33%
242
29%
203
9%
210
12%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
438
840
92%
517
18%
456
4%
413
-6%
372
-15%
H.264
502
847
69%
722
44%
892
78%
648
29%
411
-18%

Pro

+ diseño estiloso
+ buen software
+ varias configuraciones de sonido y vídeo
+ veloz sensor de huellas
+ cámara fiable
+ cámara frontal de alta resolución
+ buenas fotos
+ clara calidad de voz
+ MHL, NFC, USB-OTG
+ controles precisos
+ iluminación homogéneaeven illumination
+ display brillante
+ bajas emisiones de calor
+ buenos altavoces

Contra

- apps de publicidad
- altísimo consumo de energía
- transferencia de memoria lenta
- GPS tarda mucho en encontrar satélite
- altas desviaciones de color en el display
In review: Sony Xperia XZ. Test model provided by Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Sony Xperia XZ. Test model provided by Notebooksbilliger.de

El visionario, el Xperia XZ, por desgracia no es bastante potente para iniciar una revolución. En muchos sentidos, este modelo de pruebas es demasiado conservador y no se arriesga. Es más fiable que "revolucionario".

La cámara es un punto especial de la campaña publiciaria: ofrece muchas características buenas, pero decididamente está en la media respecto a la competeición. Lo que es más, al dispositivo le falta un estabilizador de imagen, que mejoraría la calidad de imagen con poca iluminación. El Xperia XZ puede hacer fotos como el resto de la competencia.

Respecto al aguante de la batería, la precisión del color, las velocidades del módulo WLAN, y el consumo de energía, el el Xperia XZ es insuficiente. Habríamos esperado más de un smartphone de 700 Euros. La lenta velocidad de la memoria es particularmente ofensiva, ya que alargan notablemente los tiempos de carga de los juegos.

Sony ha hecho muchas cosas bien: el software tiene muchas opciones útiles para los usuarios nuevos y las herramientas ofrecidas pueden incluso mejorar el sonido y los colores mostrados. El estiloso diseño del teléfono es definitivamente un punto a favor. Los altavoces y las temperaturas de la superficie también son bastante buenas. Nos gusta particularmente las ofertas de la app de fidelización del cliente, la Xperia Lounge.

Al final, el Xperia XZ queda definitivamente en la media en muchos aspectos. Como tal, no puede sobresalir como smartphone de gama alta. A Sony le falta la innovación real, pero ha creado un buen smartphone.

Sabemos que Sony es capaz de revolucionar el mercado smartphone: el Xperia Z5 Premium y otros modelos compactos de gama alta son prueba de su creatividad. Sin embargo, el Xperia XZ no reta los estándares establecidos para los smartphones. A pesar de ser un dispositivo fiable de gama alta, sus características pueden no merecer 700 Euros, ya que hay muchos competidores, com OnePlus 3, Galaxy S7 o iPhone 7, que rinden mucho mejor.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Sony Xperia XZ - 11/02/PM v5.1
Florian Wimmer

Acabado
90%
Teclado
66 / 75 → 88%
Ratón
87%
Conectividad
54 / 60 → 90%
Peso
91%
Battería
90%
Pantalla
85%
Rendimiento de juegos
57 / 63 → 90%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
57 / 70 → 82%
Temperatura
88%
Ruido
100%
Audio
67 / 91 → 74%
Cámara
84%
Médio
78%
87%
Smartphone - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Smartphone Sony Xperia XZ
Florian Wimmer, 2016-11-12 (Update: 2016-11-12)