Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del portátil Aorus X7 v7 (7820HK, GTX 1070, QHD)

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser, Stefanie Voigt (traducido por Francisco García), 08/20/2017

Central gaming escuálida. El Aorus X7 v7 tiene mucho que ofrecer. Además de un SSD NVMe increiblemente rápido, también cuenta con un rendimiento gaming mas que decente, un display QHD, es actualizable, y capacidad de overclocking las CPU/GPU.

Aorus X7 v7 (X7 Serie)
Adaptador gráfico
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Núcleo: 1443 MHz, Memoría: 8000 MHz, 256-bit GDDR5, ForceWare 384.94, no Optimus
Memoría
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2400, doble canal, cuatro ranuras (dos usadas)
pantalla
17.3 pulgadas 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixels 170 PPI, AU Optronics B173QTN01.4 (AUO1496), TN LED, G-Sync, 120 Hz, QHD, lustroso: no
Placa base
Intel HM175
Disco duro
Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL, 256 GB 
, + HGST HTS721010A9E630 (1 TB, 7200 rpm)
Tarjeta de sonido
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexiones
4 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Conexiones: micrófono, auriculares, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, Brightness Sensor, TPM 2.0
Equipamento de red
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 25 x 428 x 305
Battería
94 Wh Litio-Polimero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionales
Altavoces: dos altavoces + dos subwoofers, Teclado: chiclet, Luz de Teclado: si, cargador 230 W, Cyberlink PowerDVD 12, MS Office (demo), 24 Meses Garantía
Peso
3.4 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 774 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

428 mm 334 mm 53 mm 4.5 kg423 mm 322 mm 40 mm 4.3 kg423 mm 304 mm 33 mm 3.8 kg428 mm 305 mm 25 mm 3.4 kg418 mm 296 mm 31 mm 3.4 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus X7 v7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
196 MB/s ∼100%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79 MB/s ∼40% -60%
Gigabyte P57X v7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78.2 MB/s ∼40% -60%
Aorus X7 v6
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s ∼40% -60%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s ∼40% -60%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s ∼39% -61%
MSI GS73VR 7RF
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
25.9 MB/s ∼13% -87%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Aorus X7 v7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
247 MB/s ∼100%
Gigabyte P57X v7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
90.4 MB/s ∼37% -63%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89 MB/s ∼36% -64%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88 MB/s ∼36% -64%
Aorus X7 v6
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼35% -65%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼35% -65%
MSI GS73VR 7RF
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.1 MB/s ∼11% -89%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 17-an014ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
702 MBit/s ∼100% +45%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
694 MBit/s ∼99% +43%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
681 MBit/s ∼97% +40%
MSI GS73VR 7RF
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
640 MBit/s ∼91% +32%
Aorus X7 v6
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
496 MBit/s ∼71% +2%
Aorus X7 v7
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
485 MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
624 MBit/s ∼100% +25%
MSI GS73VR 7RF
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
563 MBit/s ∼90% +13%
Aorus X7 v6
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
554 MBit/s ∼89% +11%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
512 MBit/s ∼82% +3%
Aorus X7 v7
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
498 MBit/s ∼80%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
443 MBit/s ∼71% -11%
346
cd/m²
377
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
357
cd/m²
375
cd/m²
370
cd/m²
322
cd/m²
320
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 377 cd/m² Médio: 352.6 cd/m² Minimum: 18 cd/m²
iluminación: 85 %
Brillo con batería: 375 cd/m²
Contraste: 647:1 (Negro: 0.58 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.06 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 5.68 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
87% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
Aorus X7 v7
AU Optronics B173QTN01.4 (AUO1496), 2560x1440, 17.3
Aorus X7 v6
B173QTN01.0 (AUO1096), 2560x1440, 17.3
HP Omen 17-an014ng
AUO149D, 1920x1080, 17.3
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), 3840x2160, 17.3
Asus G752VS-BA338T
AU Optronics B173HAN01.1 (AUO119D), 1920x1080, 17.3
Gigabyte P57X v7
SHP145E, 3840x2160, 17.3
MSI GS73VR 7RF
AU Optronics AUO109B, 3840x2160, 17.3
Response Times
-48%
-248%
-218%
-192%
-406%
-196%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
24 (14, 10)
31 (11, 20)
-29%
45.2 (20.8, 24.4)
-88%
50 (24.4, 25.6)
-108%
36 (18, 18)
-50%
55.6 (18.4, 37.2)
-132%
38 (19.6, 18.4)
-58%
Response Time Black / White *
6 (4, 2)
10 (3, 7)
-67%
30.4 (16.4, 14)
-407%
25.6 (11.2, 14.4)
-327%
26 (14.4, 11.6)
-333%
46.8 (10.4, 36.4)
-680%
26 (16, 10)
-333%
PWM Frequency
1000 (29)
Screen
-7%
20%
28%
5%
23%
16%
Brightness middle
375
343
-9%
314
-16%
343
-9%
307
-18%
441.3
18%
371.1
-1%
Brightness
353
312
-12%
309
-12%
328
-7%
300
-15%
408
16%
343
-3%
Brightness Distribution
85
80
-6%
88
4%
84
-1%
88
4%
86
1%
86
1%
Black Level *
0.58
0.5
14%
0.34
41%
0.29
50%
0.32
45%
0.44
24%
0.42
28%
Contrast
647
686
6%
924
43%
1183
83%
959
48%
1003
55%
884
37%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.06
7.33
-21%
3.19
47%
4.01
34%
5.53
9%
5.1
16%
4.5
26%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.54
10.79
-2%
6.1
42%
6.03
43%
11.54
-9%
9.8
7%
9.7
8%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.68
7.6
-34%
3.49
39%
4.7
17%
7
-23%
4.3
24%
3.1
45%
Gamma
2.3 96%
2.19 100%
2.34 94%
2.4 92%
2.48 89%
2.08 106%
2.17 101%
CCT
7998 81%
9024 72%
7261 90%
6451 101%
8103 80%
7345 88%
7120 91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57
55
-4%
60
5%
88
54%
58
2%
87
53%
61
7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
87
84
-3%
93
7%
100
15%
90
3%
100
15%
97
11%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
-28% / -14%
-114% / -25%
-95% / -13%
-94% / -28%
-192% / -49%
-90% / -19%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 52 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 9705 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
6 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 4 ms subida
↘ 2 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta muy rápidos en nuestros tests y debería ser adecuada para juegos frenéticos.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 3 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (25.5 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
24 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 14 ms subida
↘ 10 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 11 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (40.7 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
LatencyMon
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
12814
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
23763
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6252
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
74.92 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.71 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.85 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
127.26 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
793 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
166 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
ayuda
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
171 Points ∼100% +3%
Aorus X7 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
170 Points ∼99% +2%
Aorus X7 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
166 Points ∼97%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points ∼94% -3%
MSI GS73VR 7RF
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points ∼94% -4%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
157 Points ∼92% -5%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
152 Points ∼89% -8%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
144 Points ∼84% -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
867 Points ∼100% +9%
Aorus X7 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
807 Points ∼93% +2%
Aorus X7 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
793 Points ∼91%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
742 Points ∼86% -6%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
736 Points ∼85% -7%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
735 Points ∼85% -7%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
732 Points ∼84% -8%
MSI GS73VR 7RF
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
732 Points ∼84% -8%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X7 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.93 Points ∼100% +4%
Aorus X7 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.85 Points ∼96%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.83 Points ∼95% -1%
MSI GS73VR 7RF
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points ∼94% -2%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.81 Points ∼94% -2%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.71 Points ∼89% -8%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.69 Points ∼88% -9%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
9.53 Points ∼100% +9%
Aorus X7 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
8.88 Points ∼93% +2%
Aorus X7 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
8.71 Points ∼91%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.19 Points ∼86% -6%
MSI GS73VR 7RF
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.18 Points ∼86% -6%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.09 Points ∼85% -7%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.04 Points ∼84% -8%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
6566 Points ∼100% +5%
Aorus X7 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
6252 Points ∼95%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5923 Points ∼90% -5%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
26081 Points ∼100% +10%
Aorus X7 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
23763 Points ∼91%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22434 Points ∼86% -6%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Aorus X7 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
16465 Points ∼100%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
13984 Points ∼85% -15%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Aorus X7 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
4361 Points ∼100%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
3804 Points ∼87% -13%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Aorus X7 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
15575 Points ∼100%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
14053 Points ∼90% -10%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Aorus X7 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
4942 Points ∼100%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
4603 Points ∼93% -7%
Geekbench 4.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Aorus X7 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
16165 Points ∼100%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
14767 Points ∼91% -9%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Aorus X7 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
4841 Points ∼100%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
4777 Points ∼99% -1%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Aorus X7 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
283.15 Points ∼100%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
269.97 Points ∼95% -5%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
221.52 Points ∼78% -22%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
51.583 Points ∼18% -82%
PCMark 7 Score
6874 puntos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5101 puntos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
8196 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5287 puntos
ayuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5410 Points ∼100% +2%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5289 Points ∼98% 0%
Aorus X7 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
5287 Points ∼98%
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
5088 Points ∼94% -4%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
4541 Points ∼84% -14%
MSI GS73VR 7RF
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
4259 Points ∼79% -19%
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
4218 Points ∼78% -20%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5103 Points ∼100% 0%
Aorus X7 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
5101 Points ∼100%
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
5064 Points ∼99% -1%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4989 Points ∼98% -2%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
4395 Points ∼86% -14%
MSI GS73VR 7RF
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
3581 Points ∼70% -30%
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
3569 Points ∼70% -30%
Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
Sequential Read: 2263 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1504 MB/s
512K Read: 446.9 MB/s
512K Write: 1312 MB/s
4K Read: 54.02 MB/s
4K Write: 148.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 636.3 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 538.8 MB/s
Aorus X7 v7
Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
HP Omen 17-an014ng
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
Gigabyte P57X v7
Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
Aorus X7 v6
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Alienware 17 R4
SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
7%
6%
-58%
7%
-11%
Write 4k QD32
538.8
523.4
-3%
527.2
-2%
296
-45%
530.8
-1%
531.3
-1%
Read 4k QD32
636.3
582.1
-9%
606.9
-5%
281.3
-56%
695.7
9%
628.3
-1%
Write 4k
148.2
144.9
-2%
163.8
11%
82.25
-45%
155.5
5%
128.5
-13%
Read 4k
54.02
59.06
9%
55.08
2%
26.04
-52%
44.33
-18%
38.11
-29%
Write 512
1312
853.5
-35%
1606
22%
306.1
-77%
1103
-16%
659.3
-50%
Read 512
446.9
1044
134%
400.8
-10%
315
-30%
966.3
116%
894
100%
Write Seq
1504
1212
-19%
1596
6%
305.7
-80%
1411
-6%
785.5
-48%
Read Seq
2263
1736
-23%
2791
23%
516.8
-77%
1499
-34%
1277
-44%
3DMark 06 Standard
32277 puntos
3DMark 11 Performance
17201 puntos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
160287 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
29794 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
14272 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
7679 puntos
3DMark Time Spy Score
5529 puntos
ayuda
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Alienware 17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
26438 Points ∼100% +19%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
24349 Points ∼92% +10%
Aorus X7 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
23591 Points ∼89% +6%
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
23243 Points ∼88% +5%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
22510 Points ∼85% +1%
Aorus X7 v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
22190 Points ∼84%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
21918 Points ∼83% -1%
MSI GS73VR 7RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14666 Points ∼55% -34%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Alienware 17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
21846 Points ∼100% +25%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
18346 Points ∼84% +5%
Aorus X7 v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
17433 Points ∼80%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
17289 Points ∼79% -1%
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
17170 Points ∼79% -2%
Aorus X7 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
17068 Points ∼78% -2%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
16847 Points ∼77% -3%
MSI GS73VR 7RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11384 Points ∼52% -35%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Alienware 17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
132575 Points ∼100% +13%
Aorus X7 v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
116901 Points ∼88%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
108657 Points ∼82% -7%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
101587 Points ∼77% -13%
Aorus X7 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
101012 Points ∼76% -14%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
94246 Points ∼71% -19%
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
75190 Points ∼57% -36%
MSI GS73VR 7RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
46269 Points ∼35% -60%
012345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
CPU and GPU stay comparatively cool.
CPU and GPU stay comparatively cool.
The GPU's performance drops ever so slightly over time.
The GPU's performance drops ever so slightly over time.
bajo medio alto ultra
Tomb Raider (2013) 505.8433.6358.2189.9fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 288.3255.8243.8145.8fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 249.719111961.3fps
Resident Evil 7 (2017) 517.3305.4162.7133.8fps
Prey (2017) 143.4142.9140.5139fps
Rocket League (2017) 249.8249.8219.5fps
Dirt 4 (2017) 323.1230152.882.2fps
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) 130130.5106.778.6fps
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
78.1 fps ∼100% +27%
Aorus X7 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
61.3 fps ∼78%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
59.6 fps ∼76% -3%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
59.4 fps ∼76% -3%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
58 fps ∼74% -5%
MSI GS73VR 7RF
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
41 fps ∼52% -33%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
162.9 fps ∼100% +12%
Aorus X7 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
145.8 fps ∼90%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
139.4 fps ∼86% -4%
MSI GS73VR 7RF
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
134 fps ∼82% -8%
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
130 fps ∼80% -11%
Prey - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:2TX SM AF:16x
Aorus X7 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
139 fps ∼100%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
132.5 fps ∼95% -5%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
129 fps ∼93% -7%

Ruido

Ocioso
33 / 36 / 41 dB(A)
HDD
34 dB(A)
Carga
41 / 52 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Aorus X7 v7
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Aorus X7 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
HP Omen 17-an014ng
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Asus G752VS-BA338T
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Gigabyte P57X v7
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Alienware 17 R4
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Noise
-1%
-1%
2%
5%
6%
-3%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30
-0%
31
-3%
30
-0%
29
3%
28.2
6%
Idle Minimum *
33
33
-0%
30
9%
32
3%
30
9%
30.4
8%
35.6
-8%
Idle Average *
36
35
3%
37
-3%
35
3%
32
11%
32.1
11%
35.6
1%
Idle Maximum *
41
40
2%
39
5%
38
7%
36
12%
32.1
22%
35.7
13%
Load Average *
41
43
-5%
44
-7%
42
-2%
43
-5%
45.6
-11%
50.2
-22%
Witcher 3 ultra *
45
47
-4%
44
2%
43
4%
50.2
-12%
Load Maximum *
52
54
-4%
55
-6%
50
4%
49
6%
51.5
1%
50.2
3%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

 50 °C51 °C50 °C 
 47 °C49 °C48 °C 
 41 °C43 °C42 °C 
Máximo: 51 °C
Médio: 46.8 °C
61 °C60 °C54 °C
64 °C64 °C53 °C
44 °C44 °C43 °C
Máximo: 64 °C
Médio: 54.1 °C
Conector de corriente  55 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 24 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 64 °C / 147 F, compared to the average of 41.8 °C / 107 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 43 °C / 109.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-14.3 °C / -25.7 F).
Aorus X7 v7
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Aorus X7 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
HP Omen 17-an014ng
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Asus G752VS-BA338T
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Gigabyte P57X v7
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Alienware 17 R4
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Heat
12%
1%
23%
22%
9%
9%
Maximum Upper Side *
51
47.5
7%
48
6%
39.1
23%
41
20%
51.2
-0%
49.6
3%
Maximum Bottom *
64
54.5
15%
54
16%
42.1
34%
39.3
39%
56.8
11%
56
12%
Idle Upper Side *
33
28.6
13%
35
-6%
27.9
15%
28.8
13%
29.2
12%
29.6
10%
Idle Bottom *
33
28.8
13%
37
-12%
26.1
21%
27.3
17%
29.2
12%
29.2
12%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.337.92533.7323129.2294028.8285026.426.66327.931.58026.842.610025.754.912524.654.216023.850.120023.657.525022.759.331522.162.740021.266.950020.866.863019.7668001966.6100018.571.8125017.974.2160017.773.4200017.770.2250017.771.2315017.670.3400017.562.5500017.564.2630017.466.4800017.461.41000017.5541250017.557.61600017.354.5SPL30.481.5N1.450.8median 17.9median 64.2Delta2.55.539.338.635.637.135.434.334.334.13232.131.931.531.231.330.531.129.529.62938.228.449.62856.927.756.926.356.625.856.52561.625.859.225.161.824.972.324.670.124.371.323.968.223.666.823.775.423.771.723.569.923.470.123.36623.464.823.560.636.6822.849.5median 24.9median 61.82.38.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAorus X7 v7MSI GS73VR 7RF
Aorus X7 v7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

MSI GS73VR 7RF audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.6 / 1.1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 27 / 33 / 40 Watt
Carga midlight 107 / 259 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Aorus X7 v7
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Aorus X7 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
HP Omen 17-an014ng
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Asus G752VS-BA338T
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Gigabyte P57X v7
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Alienware 17 R4
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Power Consumption
0%
16%
8%
19%
10%
-11%
Idle Minimum *
27
29
-7%
22
19%
23
15%
21
22%
15.7
42%
37.5
-39%
Idle Average *
33
31
6%
28
15%
33
-0%
27
18%
23.4
29%
37.6
-14%
Idle Maximum *
40
38
5%
35
12%
40
-0%
32
20%
23.5
41%
37.6
6%
Load Average *
107
111
-4%
93
13%
94
12%
86
20%
184.6
-73%
122.4
-14%
Load Maximum *
259
253
2%
208
20%
228
12%
206
20%
233.1
10%
277.4
-7%
Witcher 3 ultra *
190
157
17%
177
7%
165
13%
180.3
5%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
3h 41min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 40)
3h 00min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
2h 45min
Carga (máximo brillo)
1h 21min
Aorus X7 v7
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 94 Wh
HP Omen 17-an014ng
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 86 Wh
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 88 Wh
Asus G752VS-BA338T
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 90 Wh
Gigabyte P57X v7
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 75.81 Wh
MSI GS73VR 7RF
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 65 Wh
Aorus X7 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 94 Wh
Alienware 17 R4
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 99 Wh
Duración de Batería
41%
26%
60%
8%
-2%
1%
4%
Reader / Idle
221
349
58%
323
46%
445
101%
256
16%
301
36%
276
25%
H.264
165
255
55%
257
56%
WiFi v1.3
180
267
48%
218
21%
293
63%
155
-14%
163
-9%
182
1%
181
1%
Load
81
84
4%
91
12%
96
19%
98
21%
55
-32%
69
-15%

Pro

+ Panel mate de 120 Hz
+ SSD NVMe
+ Dos ranuras M.2-2280
+ Un montón de rendimiento gaming
+ Cuatro ranuras de RAM
+ G-Sync
+ Capacidades de overclocking de CPU/GPU
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ Lector de tarjetas rápido

Contra

- Ángulos de visión pobres
- Baja relación de contraste
- Alto ruido del sistema en aplicaciones 3D
- Superficies sensibles
- Baja duración de la batería
- precio alto
Aorus X7 v7. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Gigabyte.
Aorus X7 v7. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Gigabyte.

En el exterior, el Aorus A7  X7 v7 parece muy similar a su predecesor. Las actualizaciones y mejoras se han realizado principalmente en el interior. Por ejemplo, el lector de tarjetas SD actualizado y ahora mucho más rápido, la disposición de puertos, el nuevo puerto Thunderbolt 3.0 o el puerto USB Tipo A adicional. Además, el nuevo modelo también cuenta con una ranura M.2-2280 más y ahora puede tomar hasta dos SSD NVMe al mismo tiempo.

El  Aorus X7 v7 es un portatil gaming bien hecho que viene con su propio set de inconvenientes únicos a pesar de su alto precio.

La 7 ª versión del Aorus cuenta con un Core i7-7820HK quad-core de 7 ª generación, lo que resulta en un menor rendimiento en comparación con su predecesor. Sin embargo, la combinación de quad-core  Kaby Lake y GeForce GTX 1070 es lo suficientemente potente como para ejecutar todos los juegos actuales sin problemas, en muchos casos incluso en la resolución QHD nativa del display. Gracias a Nvidia G-Sync, las velocidades de fotogramas se sincronizan con el panel de 120 Hz del portátil.

El SSD NVMe garantiza un sistema fluido como la seda, y el disco duro de 1TB de 2,5" ofrece mucho espacio de almacenamiento. Ambas unidades pueden cambiarse y actualizarse fácilmente, sin embargo, debe quitarse la cubierta inferior completa debido a la falta de escotillas de mantenimiento.

En particular,nos gustó el alto brillo del display mate QHD, pero fue decepcionante en otros aspectos, como su bajo contraste, ángulos de visión pobres, y una cobertura de espacio de color relativamente baja. En este rango de precios, esperamos más. Por lo menos el deseo de grandes ángulos de visión se puede cumplir con la configuración 4Kdel X7 v7.


Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Aorus X7 v7 - 08/14/2017 v6
Sascha Mölck

Acabado
82 / 98 → 83%
Teclado
87%
Ratón
81%
Conectividad
67 / 81 → 83%
Peso
54 / 10-66 → 78%
Battería
68%
Pantalla
84%
Rendimiento de juegos
97%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
98%
Temperatura
73 / 95 → 77%
Ruido
64 / 90 → 71%
Audio
70%
Médio
77%
85%
Gaming - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del portátil Aorus X7 v7 (7820HK, GTX 1070, QHD)
Sascha Mölck, 2017-08-20 (Update: 2017-08-20)